Page 1

volume 09 number 2

2009 Summer Edition

federation news


FE DE R ATI O N NE WS GF TU /I E R

The Institute of Employment Rights The People’s Centre 50-54 Mount Pleasant Liverpool L3 5SD tel: 0151 702 6925 fax: 0151 702 6935 email office@ier.org.uk www.ier.org.uk

General Federation of Trade Unions 4th Floor Headland House 308/312 Grays Inn Road London WC1X 8DP 020 7520 8340 (24hrs) fax 020 7520 8350 email gftuhq@gftu.org.uk www.gftu.org.uk

The Institute of Employment Rights was launched in 1989. As a labour law ‘think tank’, supported by the trade union movement, its purpose is to provide research, ideas and detailed argument. In 1994 the Institute was granted charitable status.

The General Federation of Trade Unions was founded in 1899. It provides services and benefits, mainly in the fields of education and research, to affiliated unions. The education work of the Federation is administered through an Educational Trust, which was established in 1971. Federation News is a series of short articles in the subject areas of labour law, labour economics and industrial relations, which are of interest to industrial relations practitioners and students.

The results of the work of the Institute are published in papers and booklets and developed at conferences and seminars. Our aim is to provide the tools of analysis and debate for the trade union movement in the area of labour law.

We welcome the submission of articles for consideration for publication in future editions. Please send articles to the Institute of Employment Rights at the above address or electronically to cad@ier.org.uk. The views expressed in Federation News do not represent the collective views of the Institute of Employment Rights or of the GFTU, but only the views of the authors. The responsibility of the Institute and the GFTU is limited to approving this publication as worthy of consideration within the labour movement.

Editor Michael Bradley Executive Editors for this edition Steve Gibbons and Carolyn Jones Advisory Editorial Board John Bell Richard Beresford Stephen Cavalier Bill Dewhurst Rosie Eagleson Keith Ewing John Fray Dan Gallin John Hendy Judith Jackson Carolyn Jones Aileen McColgan Doug Nicholls Roger Seifert Dave Spooner Roger Welch Frank Wilkinson ISSN 0014 9411


VO LU ME 09 NU M BE R 2 SU MM E R 2009

Contents Editorial: Issues of Enforcement

Steve Gibbons

2

The Government must act to protect our collective agreements

KD Ewing

4

Trade Unions as Litigators: Devising Trade Union Legal Services for the Future

Georgina Hirsch

6

Equal Pay: Managing Individual Rights and Collective Aspirations

Bronwyn McKenna

9

Effective enforcement of employment rights for vulnerable workers

Alison Balchin

IER events catalogue

12 Centre Page Pullout

Enforcing the unenforceable: working with migrants and other disenfranchised communities

Sonia McKay

15

Construction: A licence to kill?

Alan Ritchie

17

Regulating the rogues: we've only just begun

Jack Dromey

19

Enforcement Issues: Lessons from health and safety?

Phil James

21

Enforcing the National Minimum Wage – lessons for other employment rights

Bob Simpson

23

Resolving individual employment disputes at work – the new regime

Keith Mizon

25

Time for a labour inspectorate?

Steve Gibbons

27

1


FE DE R ATI O N NE WS GF TU /I E R

Editorial: Issues of Enforcement All the labour rights in the world are nothing unless they are enforced properly. Without some kind of device or actor to support workers achieving their rights, they just become paper tigers. This is not to say that there is one simple means of enforcing rights, rather there is a mix ranging from collective enforcement through trade union action and collective bargaining, which in an ideal world is both the simplest and most effective, through to employment tribunals and emerging methods to promote the rights of otherwise marginalised and ‘hard to reach’ workers.

Unions do not always find it easy to marry their role as a collective political organisation with that of supporting individual enforcement of employment rights. This places the role of trade union legal services in focus. Georgina Hirsch suggests that litigation should not be the only role for trade union legal services. Looking to lessons from the USA, she suggests that a strategic approach to litigation, and a litigation minded approach to industrial legal advice, can together help defend and enhance the power of trade unions to fight for their members.

The aim of this edition of Federation News is to provide some insight into both the challenges to enforcement of both individual and trade union rights, but also to look at some potential ways forward. Key questions when looking at the enforcement of labour rights include the freeing of trade unions to protect the rights of not just their members, but those working for subcontractors working at unionised worksites or on a sectoral basis; the need for a strategic balance between litigation and collective pursuit of the best deal for workers; the importance of considering new enforcement mechanisms in relation to the most vulnerable ;and the possibilities of creating unified and proactive institutional enforcement bodies.

During litigation tensions can arise when balancing the aspirations of individuals for an immediate solution and compensation and the collective pursuit of rights. This is put in stark light by Bronwyn McKenna’s explanation of the issues that have arisen in relation to UNISON’s campaign for equal pay on behalf of its members and the Courts’ views on the appropriateness of a collective rather than litigation approach to unpicking the complexities of gender equality in public sector pay.

Collective action to defend rights One of the most crucial challenges faced by trade unions in enforcing the rights of workers over and above statutory minima is that posed by the decisions of the ECJ in Viking and Laval, and subsequent decisions, which restrict the rights of both trade unions and public authorities to take action to support decent wage levels. This came to a head recently in relation to the Lindsey Oil dispute. Professor Keith Ewing puts forward some clear practical solutions, notable fast and clear domestic legislation to implement the Posted Workers Directive and avoid the problems created by Viking and Laval. A clear legislative call which needs to be implemented before the forthcoming election.

2

Protecting the most vulnerable, new enforcement challenges The TUC’s Commission on Vulnerable Employment (COVE) has come up with some very clear recommendations on enforcement, as a means of trying to ensure that vulnerable workers are better treated. These include the extension of licencing along the lines of the Gangmasters Licencing Authority to not only construction, but the whole agency sector; equal rights for agency workers; changes to the enforcement of tribunal awards; more resources for enforcement agencies; review of immigration rules which can lead to conditions for exploitation and an urgent review of employment status. Such steps are urgently required, as Alison Balchin notes “The extent of exploitative treatment uncovered by CoVE was shocking, taking place in a legal framework that fails to prevent exploitation. This analysis is reinforced by Sonia McKay, who points out the plight of


VO LU ME 09 NU M BE R 2 SU MM E R 2009

undocumented migrant workers, their vulnerability to exploitation, and difficulty in enforcing their rights.

Institutional and innovative solutions There have been some recent changes to the tribunal system, including a greater emphasis on ACAS guidance, with a new ACAS Code of Practice on discipline and grievance as outlined by Keith Mizon. Nonetheless, there is still a feeling that the tribunal system does not reach some parts of the economy. In this context, there is currently some focus on the lessons to be learned from the experiences of the Gangmasters Licencing Authority and the possibility of extending the scheme, or equivalents, to other areas. There has been a strong recommendation to the Government to extend the Authority to construction in the recently published Donaghy Report and, as Alan Ritchie points out, such an initiative is long overdue on account of the levels of exploitation in the industry and the difficulties in enforcing rights. He also suggests that the construction industry will fight long and hard to resist the proposals. Support for extension of licensing to the construction, and other sectors, comes from Jack Dromey, who suggests that the GLA’s approach is showing dividends, but that there are real problems in terms of the GLA having sufficient resources to deliver what is expected of it. Phil James and Steve Gibbons both consider whether there is scope to push for the idea of the creation of a generalised labour inspectorate to promote the enforcement of labour rights. Professor James looks at the issues drawing on the experience of the enforcement of health and safety rights at work. While far from painting a pretty picture, he suggests that what is required is a ‘belts and braces’, or duel track, approach whereby workers retain the right to also pursue the enforcement of their legal rights themselves, and to have access to the financial and other support they need to do so. He also suggests that some of the instruments used in health and safety law could be adapted for broader employment rights. The creation of a labour inspectorate would be a bold, but by no means impossible task. As the recently created National Employment Rights Authority in Ireland shows, the creation of unified agencies aimed at providing a consistent

and comprehensive form of enforcing labour rights is the way of the future, rather than of the past. Key to this is the incorporation of tripartite governance and recognition of the important and efficient use of trade unions as enforcement agents in the workplace. This need for joined-up government action also comes out from Bob Simpson’s analysis of lessons from the enforcement of the national minimum wage for other employment rights. He points out that there has been uncertainty on prosecution policy and also that there is a need for enforcement of rights for vulnerable workers to extend beyond identifying and sanctioning non-compliant employers; they need to include processes for securing actual compliance, past and present, with workers’ rights without the workers having to take initiatives which may expose them to victimisation or dismissal, whether or not that would be unlawful.

Time for action There are clear and important themes arising from this issue of Federation News and the need for immediate consideration of a number of matters by the Government before the election, not least the following: • There is urgent need for the introduction of legislation to reduce or remove the impact of Laval and Viking in the UK. • The law needs to be clarified to give trade unions rights to pursue collective bargaining solutions to equal pay that cannot be undermined by individual litigants • The Government should extend the GLA to construction and consider whether it is appropriate to other sectors • Agency workers’ rights should be introduced and consolidated • The recommendations of CoVE should be implemented In the longer term there should be a thorough review and consolidation of the various bodies charged with labour standards enforcement and the creation of a unified model which places trade unions and collective bargaining at the core. Steve Gibbons

3


federation news

Alison Balchin is an Employment Rights Officer at the TUC.

Her areas of expertise include precarious work, employment status, agency work, extension of licensing, whistle blowing, data protection and monitoring at work. Prior to joining the TUC in 2003, Alison advised ATL, the BMA and the West Midlands Low Pay Unit.

Jack Dromey is Deputy General Secretary of Unite. He chaired the campaign that brought the Gangmasters Licensing Authority into being. Jack served as a member of both the TUC Commission on Vulnerable Employees and the Government's Vulnerable Workers Forum. He now leads for the TUC on the newlyestablished Fair Employment Enforcement Board.

Keith Ewing is Professor of Public Law at Kings College

London and President of the Institute of Employment Rights.

Steve Gibbons is Director of Labour Rights at Ergon

Associates. He specialises in collective and individual labour rights, particularly in an international context. He has acted as a consultant to the ILO, World Bank, European Commission and others. Prior to joining Ergon, Steve was Head of Employment Law at Incomes Data Services and Editor of IDS Brief

Georgina Hirsch is Director of Legal Services for Unite the

Union. Georginaʼs work includes input on policy and lobbying on employment rights and related issues, as well as responsibility for memberʼs cases and ensuring that the unionʼs officers and reps have appropriate and up to date training on all significant developments.

Phil James is Professor of Employment Relations at Oxford

Published by the GFTU Educational Trust 4th Floor Headland House 308/312 Grays Inn Road London WC1X 8DP in association with The Institute of Employment Rights The Peopleʼs Centre 50-54 Mount Pleasant Liverpool L3 5SD

Brookes University. He has researched and published widely in the fields of occupational health and safety including the co-authored IER book Regulating Health and Safety at Work: An Agenda for Change. Phil is currently deputy editor of the journal Policy and Practice in Health and Safety.

Carolyn Jones is Director of the Institute of Employment Rights Sonia McKay is Professor of European Socio-Legal Studies at

the Working Lives Research Institute where she heads a number of research projects mainly focusing on migration. Sonia previously worked for LRD, the independent trade union-based research organisation, where she held the post of employment law researcher from 1983.

Bronwyn McKenna is UNISONʼs Director of Organising and

Membership. She specialises in trade union and employment law, particularly discrimination, equal pay, TUPE and collective consultation. She is a member of the CAC and of the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council and chairs the Councilʼs Employment Task Group. She represents the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council on the Tribunal Procedure Committee.

Keith Mizon is ACASʼ Director of Individual Dispute Resolution,

Produced by IER Printed by Upstream Cover pic of Construction site, Belfast © ILO/M Crozet Price £8 to IER subscribers and members (£30 others)

responsible for statutory individual conciliation and individual mediation services. He has worked as both an ACAS accredited collective and individual conciliator/mediator. Recently, he was part of a team delivering seminars and mediation training to Australian Federal and State Industrial Relations Commissioners.

Alan Ritchie has recently been re-elected as General Secretary of the building workers union, UCATT..

Bob Simpson is a Reader in Law at the London School of

Economics. He specialises in Labour Law with particular interests in collective labour law and the law relating to pay. His Building on the National Minimum Wage was published by the IER in 2001. Bob is an EC member of IER and sits on IERʼs Publications Sub Committee.

Preview: Federation News: Enforcement Issues  

Buy full version online here: http://www.ier.org.uk/node/420 This edition brings together an excellent range of issues highlighting the pro...