Page 1

ARCH 492 S3 Course Surveys Degree Project by Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill and Southern, John and Dietz, Andrea School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

19

Surveys:

8

Response Rate:

42%

2010 SPRING Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.7

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.4

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

4.9

4.4

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

4.5

4.3

(8) Organization Avg:

4.8

4.2

( 11) Professor Overall:

4.9

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

4.8

4.2

(10) Course Overall:

4.8

4.2

Disagree = 1

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

Agree = 5

Avg

0

0

0

1

7

4.87

0

0

0

3

5

4.62

0

0

1

7

4.87

YES! But a definite positive.

2. I learned and now understand the course materials ready for the next level

I think I know more about the USPS than they know about themselves!

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

They step out of their way to tend to use as a studio All around, every teacher had a genuine interest...something I greatly appreciate in a studio setting.

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

2

6

4.75

Both professors were extremely helpful at all hours of the day, availability that was quite helpful and needed due to the demands of a thesis. Always available :)

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

1

7

4.87

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

2

6

4.75

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

1

0

4

3

4.12

0

0

0

2

6

4.75

YES!!!!

your grade reflex your efforts

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

Our professors were always ready to provide us with suggestions and case studies that would help us move forward with our work.

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

1

2

5

4.50

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

0

1

6

4.85

needed Heavy workload, but necessary to develop a thesis project.


11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

1

7

4.87

0

0

2

3

3

4.12

their skills and knowledge out way all other studio instructor They were AMAZING!!!!!!

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

This was one of the most rewarding studios of my 5 years at the University I thank you for the best semester @ Woodbury University. Igallil and Andrea are great assets to the University. Do WHATEVER it takes to keep them, because they are the present and future of the Architectural Department. I feel like this class was one of the most beneficial courses I have ever taken. It really pushed me to think and create on a level not seen in any other class. The teachers each provided assistance from varying perspectives which I feel greatly helped this section of studio develop projects at a much higher caliber than other DP sections. I believe future DP sections should be taught by instructors of various expertises, as this term worked out fairly well with Ingalill, Andrea, and Eric each being experts in their own respective specialties. Thank you all for a wonderful semester, it was a lot of fun! :) this is first studio that I am able to relate everything I learned over the years. Workload isn't extremely heavy but provides an opportunity to reflect my ideas(voice) in the work. i love it. thank you!!


ARCH 4752 A1 Course Surveys Foreign Study Studio: Tahiti by Stauffer and Wahlroos-Ritter and Wahlroos-Ritter School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

22

Surveys:

5

Response Rate:

23%

2010 SUMMER Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.4

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.1

3.9

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

4.6

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

4.0

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

4.2

4.1

( 11) Professor Overall:

4.4

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

4.5

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

3.8

4.1

Disagree = 1

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

Agree = 5

Avg

0

0

3

2

4.40

0

0

3

2

4.40

This coarse is part of the reason why I want and will become a Architect!

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

There is nothing better then being among the people and adopting their methods of their community, and urban ways.

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

1

1

3

4.40

Both Ingalill and Randy were amazing. I'm also appreciative for Roland's input.

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

2

3

4.60

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

2

3

4.60

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

1

1

3

4.40

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

2

0

0

3

3.80

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

1

2

2

4.20

Felt left in the dark most of the time with information regarding the final intent of this studio.

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

1

0

2

2

4.00

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

1

0

3

1

3.80

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

3

2

4.40

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

3

1

1

3.60

The topic is great, however the end product has been stumbled upon in a disorganized fashion, possibly due to it being the first attempt.


I am grateful for this experience, however a little disheartened about the fact that this studio was going to really influence the community in Huahine where as now we've hit a dead end because there is no budget, program, or client. This coarse description was misleading. Next year will hopefully be a little more organized as far as final goals for the studio and the reality of what we’re working with. I strongly recommend spending more time at the craft school in Papeete, this is where I learned the most about my material and really developed AMAZING friendships and contacts. This is also where I was able to observe and take in the culture and learned the most French. The field template guides were like pulling teeth and didn't find them beneficial, especially when you could find the same sketches and information in our sketch books. The encyclopedic entry is brilliant and is a great source to pour all the information one has collected into! Over all, THANK YOU! I absolutely loved this studio. Not only because we got the chance to spend a month in Tahiti, but the instructors were great. I feel so honored to be taught by the two chairs of architecture and interior architecture. I recommend this class to everyone. It was an absolute exhilarating experience!


PPDV 200 F5 Course Surveys Transition to Woodbury by Wahlroos-Ritter School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Transdisciplinary Personal Development

Adds:

11

Surveys:

11

Response Rate:

100%

2010 FALL Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.2

3.8

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.5

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

4.9

4.4

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

4.7

4.4

(8) Organization Avg:

4.6

4.3

( 11) Professor Overall:

4.5

4.3

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

4.5

4.2

(10) Course Overall:

4.3

4.0

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

0

2

8

1

3.90

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

0

0

6

5

4.45

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

0

3

8

4.72

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

7

4

4.36

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

1

10

4.90

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

5

6

4.54

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

0

0

6

4

4.40

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

0

4

7

4.63

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

0

3

8

4.72

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

1

6

4

4.27

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

5

6

4.54

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

8

2

1

3.36


ARCH 492 S2 Course Surveys Degree Project by Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill and Southern, John and Branda, Ewan and Ericson, Mark and Greiman, April School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

11

Surveys:

5

Response Rate:

45%

2011 SPRING Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

5.0

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.9

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

5.0

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

5.0

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

5.0

4.2

( 11) Professor Overall:

5.0

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

5.0

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

5.0

4.2

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

Instructors were helpful all the time including weekends and their days off

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

It would be better if there were less assignments but rather letting students figure out what to do

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

0

2

3

4.60


Ingalill, Mark, and Ewan makes best team. It was a best studio course, they should remain as a team Thank you for all of your help you guys have greatly helped me in my drawings and model making skills. This final semester was a rigorous one, but it was the most stimulating. The collaboration of all three instructors was brilliant in which each one had a different skill. Ewan, knowledgeable about almost anything, who provided examples after examples for one to enhance and broaden ones creativity. Mark, the analog king who made me start a design process outside my norm. Ingalill, who was always there to enhance my design through detail and its perks. I did in fact start designing in a way that I had not in my past semesters of designing and I appreciate that as well as take that as a new and powerful tool for my career in this liberating field. I thank all of you for an invigorating semester and will miss you all as well as Woodbury Itself. I hope all future degree project semesters have the same collaboration of unique instructors such as yourselves. best always, Jenny A.


ARCH 2703 BU Course Surveys The Matter of Polynesia by Stauffer, Randall and Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill and Dalla Valle, Sabrina School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

11

Surveys:

1

Response Rate:

9%

2011 SPRING 7 Week - Session 2 This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.0

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

5.0

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

5.0

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

5.0

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

5.0

4.2

( 11) Professor Overall:

5.0

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

5.0

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

5.0

4.2

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

0

1

0

0

3.00

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

0

1

5.00

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

1

0

0

3.00


ARCH 2705 BU Course Surveys The Matter of Polynesia by Stauffer, Randall and Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill and Dalla Valle, Sabrina School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

4

Surveys:

1

Response Rate:

25%

2011 SPRING 7 Week - Session 2 This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

1.0

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

1.0

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

1.0

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

1.0

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

1.0

4.2

( 11) Professor Overall:

1.0

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

1.0

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

1.0

4.2

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

10. Overall, this course is very good

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

1

0

0

0

0

1.00

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

1

0

0

3.00


ARCH 4752 A1 Course Surveys Foreign Study Studio: Tahiti by Stauffer, Randall and Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

10

Surveys:

3

Response Rate:

30%

2011 SUMMER Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.3

4.2

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.3

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

4.7

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

4.7

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

4.7

4.2

( 11) Professor Overall:

4.7

4.2

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

4.7

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

4.3

4.2

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

0

0

2

1

4.33

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

0

0

2

1

4.33

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

2

1

4.33

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

0

0

2

1

4.33

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

0

2

1

4.33

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

1

2

0

3.66


ARCH 692 S1 Course Surveys Graduate Thesis Studio by Wahlroos-Ritter, Ingalill and Fontenot, Anthony and Rabin, Daniel and Greiman, April and Ahrens, Chandler and Richmond, Deborah School/Dept: Year/Term: Session:

Architecture Architecture

Adds:

10

Surveys:

5

Response Rate:

50%

2012 SPRING Trad Day/Evening This Course || Dept Avg.

This Course || Dept Avg.

(Q.1&2) Learning Avg:

4.8

4.0

(6,7) Examinations Avg:

4.8

4.0

(5) Enthusiasm Avg:

4.8

4.3

(9) Group Interaction Avg:

5.0

4.2

(8) Organization Avg:

5.0

4.0

( 11) Professor Overall:

5.0

4.1

(3&4) Individual Rapport:

4.9

4.1

(10) Course Overall:

4.7

4.1

Disagree = 1

Agree = 5

Avg

1. I find the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

2. I learned and now understand the course materials

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

3. Instructor has a genuine interest in individual students

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

4. Instructor is adequately accessible to students after class or during office hours

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

5. Instructor is enthusiastic about teaching the course

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

6. Feedback on coursework, including examinations and graded materials, is valuable

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

7. Methods of evaluating student work are fair and appropriate

0

0

0

1

4

4.80

8. The instructor is well prepared and explains material carefully

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

9. Students are encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0

0

0

0

5

5.00

10. Overall, this course is very good

0

0

0

1

2

4.66

11. Overall, this instructor is very good

0

0

0

0

4

5.00

12 . The course workload is (1 = too easy, 3 = just right, 5 = too hard)

0

0

2

2

1

3.80

Daniel Rabin and Ingalill W-Ritter are great instructor and it was a pleasure working with them. Too many instructors voicing their opinions makes these extremely difficult at times.

F12 course evaluations  

F12 course evaluations

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you