Page 1

Bad Apples in the Barrel Personality Disorders at Work Dr Michael Reddy HPA Special Report

ABOUT HPA Human Potential Accounting (HPA) is a multi-disciplinary human capital management consultancy , led by its founder, business and occupational psychologist Dr Michael Reddy. HPA offers diagnostic audit tools, Human Capital Management (HCM) business intelligence, and organisational risk management. HPA works with organisations to improve and reinforce the effectiveness of their HCM processes and practice.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Best known as founder and former Chairman of ICAS, the psychological services, Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) and ‘return to work’ company, which he ran for 20 years and brought to international status with 17 offices overseas. Michael is a Chartered Clinical and Occupational Psychologist, Associate Fellow of the British Psychological Society and Fellow of the RSA.

EDITORIAL TEAM Author Dr Michael Reddy Editor Lucy Caton Designer James Lucas

Published by The Watchman

Copyright © 2014 Human Potential Accounting Ltd

1 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Contents 3

Executive Summary


How To Get the Most Out Of This Paper


Case Study 1 - The Hero CEO


The Two Most Relevant Personality Disorders


Anti-Social Personality Disorder


Case Study 2 - ~Breivik


Case Study 3 - Unacceptable Behaviour


Narcissistic Personality Disorder


Case Study 4 - Impression Management





2 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Bad Apples in the Barrel Executive Summary S

ome of the best known and most damaging scandals in the financial services and investment industries of the past decade, as likewise in examples of high level political exploitation, morally reprehensible corporate activity and illegal media excess, have been carried out by

individuals within such organisations and institutions recognised in the psychological literature as personality disorders. Although well recognised in psychiatry, psychotherapy and counselling settings, Personality Disorders have attracted little attention in management circles where they are in fact most prevalent and dangerous; neglected possibly because they are understood as manifestations of mental illness. This is a fundamental misconception. Mental and physical health is a legitimate concern of Boards and top management where diagnosis and treatment are best left in the care of professionals. Personality Disorders however are in no way a matter of mental health but only of behaviour, and therefore within the legitimate territory of management oversight and intervention. In terms of percentages it has been suggested that 1% of the United States population have a personality disorder. It has likewise been suggested that in the business context 3% are likely to be such, and that in financial services and investing industries proportions are sometimes given as 4%, to rise in some cases well beyond that. There is no reason to suppose that UK figures would vary much from US statistics. In either case they would add up to a lot of individuals. Robert Hare (p.4, ‘Snakes and Suits’) argues strongly that the fast pace of life today means that personality disorders are naturally attracted to business and financial organisations for the excitement they offer, while recruitment processes can be accelerated against the background of a search for charismatic leaders. Such individuals damage the business sometimes fatally, and wherever they are found, they remain extremely difficult to spot thanks to their exceptional skills in ‘impression management’ - bad apples with shiny skins.


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

How to get the most out of this Paper T

he left-hand column of text explains the way in which Personality Disorders (and particularly Anti-Social and Narcissistic Personality Disorders) are understood and exemplified in the formal language of the ‘bibles’ of psychiatry and psychology: the Diagnostic and

Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM4 and the most recent, May 2013, DSM4, published by the American Psychiatric Association); and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD10), published by the International Labour Office in Geneva, the younger but now recognised as the official coding system used also in the United States. These diagnostic criteria are said to ‘reflect a consensus of current formulations of evolving knowledge’ (DSM4), and are acknowledged and exemplified in the West by virtually every practitioner and academic. A selection of Case Studies and additional expert commentary, set alongside the main text, exemplify and illustrate the paper, making it come alive for the reader.

Note to The Reader: Channel 4’s 90-minute programme on December 13 2013 under the title of ‘Psychopath Night’’ has kickstarted a wave of media interest that shows no sign of abating, and has already robbed the word psychopath of any agreed meaning among so many commentators. For the sake of clarity in this text we have limited the use of the term to displays of viciousness and violence in its most popular and sensational interpretation. Many texts however make little distinction between ‘psychopath’ and ‘sociopath’, taking them to be virtually coterminous. We have therefore limited the use of ‘psychopath’ to its violent connotations (as in the Anti-Social Personality Disorder) and used ‘sociopath’ to exemplify nonviolent manifestations (as in the Narcissistic Personality Disorder).


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Case Study 1

The Hero CEO This may be considered as a composite case study. Partly because it could stand for any number of organisations in the financial services, investing, media, corporate and political worlds, and partly because any particular case might be too easily recognised. Contagion is emblematic of what happens round a ‘charismatic’ leader, a hero CEO to the point that even after he/she has gone the aura sometimes remains. Some of those who reported directly to such a leader often perpetuate his/ her style of thinking and judgement. These are not born ‘personality disorders’ but remain infected with the same personality disorder dynamic, making it all the more difficult for a new and different kind of leader to escape the legacy of the past and rewrite the future.


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Two Personality Disorders Relevant to Business he following descriptions of “Personality Disorders” are designed for the use of clinicians but are graphic and explicit enough to be equally useful to Boards and senior management. The same format is used for all ten Personality Disorders. In each case a number of indicators are given among which a smaller selection is said to be sufficient to establish a probable diagnosis. Hence the term Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. It is noteworthy that descriptions of all ten Personality Disorders occupy only 10 of DSM4’s 358 pages, an inadvertent indication perhaps that they are barely considered as genuine examples of mental ill health compared with the neurotic and psychotic conditions which form the bulk of the manual. Generically they are described as:


“An enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture in two of the following four ways: cognition, affectivity, interpersonal functioning and impulse control. The enduring pattern is inflexible and pervasive across a broad range of personal and social situations.


The enduring pattern leads to clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.” The ten Personality Disorders recognised by DSM4 are: •

Paranoid Personality Disorder

Schizoid Personality Disorder

Schizotypal Personality Disorder

Anti-Social Personality Disorder

Borderline Personality Disorder

Histrionic Personality Disorder

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Avoidant Personality Disorder

Dependent Personality Disorder

Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder

For purposes of reducing a mass of material to useful proportions this paper focuses on the two most damaging personality disorders relevant to every Board of Directors, and the ones they are most likely to have been harbouring and fostering unawares: Anti-Social Personality Disorder and Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Commentary The outstanding contributor to the literature on psychopaths in business is Robert D. Hare, Author of ‘Without Conscience’ and creator of the ‘Psychopathy Checklist – Revised’ PCR, a tool for diagnosing psychopathy. He has for example commented that “The still relatively new fast-moving global business world is attractive to such people where corners can be cut in recruitment processes, and where their skills in impression management can dress them in the clothes of the decisive and charismatic leader everyone wants to bring into the business.” See Babiak and Hare, “Snakes in Suits” (Harper, 2006). Three further examples from the same text will illustrate their flavour and weight.

One of the core drivers in the life of a psychopath is the need for excitement, the excitement of conning and manipulating others, the skill above all others in which they excel. A corollary is that such individuals live for the moment, consequently without long term career goals they fail utterly to plan for the future. And when one target wises up there will always be the option to move on smoothly to the next set of willing victims Robert D. Hare, Ph.D


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Whether we are dealing with an agreed baseline of 1% in the population as a whole, or the likely 3% and up among top management, and especially in the lure of the financial services industry, it is impossible to exaggerate the damage such individuals, however few in numbers, do to the companies they nest in. Robert D. Hare, Ph.D

The presence of a psychopath in a team will often divide opinion to the point where it seems impossible that the same individual is being considered. The successful psychopath will have “recruited� a coterie of admirers while others who have been excluded from the campaign will often feel uncomfortable without knowing exactly why, or they will see clearly what is happening but feel unable or disinclined to intervene. Robert D. Hare, Ph.D


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Anti-Social Personality Disorder he term is not ideal because of connotations of violence in the UK context; the ICD-10 term ‘asocial’ is preferable. However, the characteristics of each system are more or less interchangeable and the DSM4 list of constituents is used in this paper:


3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead; 4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults; 5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;

“There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behaviour or honour financial obligations;

1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviours as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest;

7. Lack of remorse, by being indifferent of such behaviours can be diagnosed as such with a high degree of probability.”

2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;

As noted above the probability model used by DSM4 says that of these seven indicators only three are needed to establish a likely diagnosis.


Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Case Study 2


It should be noted that the issue of sanity does not arise with Personality Disorders. In the case of Breivik, the Norwegian killer of more than a hundred young people on a holiday island (in conjunction with planned explosions on the mainland), the Court correctly ruled against a plea of insanity, on the grounds that, from his own statements, Breivik could not be diagnosed as insane (i.e. psychotic, as meaning out of touch with reality). Breivik himself made it perfectly clear that he was coldly aware of what he was doing and why, and also that his behaviour was outside the boundaries of expected social behaviour. No. 3 of the list above also has special importance in dealing with any Personality Disorder, namely the typical failure to plan ahead, which is naturally coherent with

a conviction that he or she will be able to talk their way out of any impasse. Such individuals are therefore periodically caught, once those they are dealing with have found them out. In the simplest terms therefore we are talking about individuals who have a fixed way of interacting with colleagues and clients, although the fact that this is the only way they know how to behave will not be obvious given that their speech and style is likely to be fluent and even captivating. Personality Disorders have only one way of thinking and acting. They know no other but their skill and varied experience in deploying this fixed style is the first reason why they are so difficult to detect. They may well be aware they are lying but because they have talked themselves out of trouble so many times they remain unconcerned, even if it means another lie to cover up the first – which, more often than not, works perfectly.

10 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

People with psychopathy are very good at reading the minds of their victims. So you can see the cognitive part of empathy as functioning very well, but the fact that they don’t have the appropriate emotional response to someone else’s state of mind [suggests that] the affective part of empathy is not functioning normally. Prof. Simon Baron-Cohenc

Individuals predisposed to fraud, deceit, manipulation, and insider trading may be far more numerous than the 10% estimate that has attracted so much attention. Ronald Schouten, MD, JD

11 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

While full-blown psychopaths are not deterred by fear and do not learn from punishment, ‘almost’ psychopaths can be given the message that adverse consequences will follow misconduct. Ronald Schouten, MD, JD

The only way to deal with a true psychopath is to get him or her out of the organisation is fast as possible. Ronald Schouten, MD, JD

This may not be as difficult as imagined for the simple reason that, on whatever basis the individual’s behaviour is first challenged, there will almost always be more below the surface which he or she will want to remain hidden - such as clandestine connivance with another employee, false accounting, financial dishonesty elsewhere, tax evasion, etc., etc. It will often be simpler for the individual to bow out, maybe protesting loudly, but relieved to make an exit before more unwanted background emerges.

12 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Case Study 3

Unacceptable Behaviour Alan was employed as a ‘consultant’ in a contact centre, dealing with customer enquiries which, due to the delicate nature of the work, required a degree of sensitivity. Alan was a seemingly amiable, if not ingratiating, individual who had been taken on readily because he had a qualification in counselling. One day he was called in by the HR manager who had been alerted to some questionable behaviour with a customer on Alan’s part. They met in the early afternoon and the HR manager explained the nature of the complaint. Alan leaned forward and sniffed. “Have you been drinking?” he asked. The HR manager was disconcerted and replied truthfully “only orange juice.” By then the initiative had passed to Alan which was all he needed and the interview ended abruptly without any resolution of the issue. Personality disorder behaviour is powered by a seemingly uncanny ability to reach a weak spot in the other’s armoury. A personality disorder is free from the scruples of normal social interaction and has time to exploit exceptional insight into the other person’s psychological make-up. In Alan’s case there is no information about his family background. The only known detail is that he joined after seven years with the local police force. This was the only CV content a gullible recruiter felt they needed to know. He was not even asked in what circumstances or why he had left the Force. Alan quietly moved on, as it were, before inevitable action was taken against him. Footnote It should be noted that Alan’s amiability was simply his standard modus operandi. Another psychopath of the authors acquaintance used neediness as his SMO. When challenged to return a significant sum of money that he had borrowed under contract to return within 6 months he was still pleading his own needs as an excuse three years later. Once it was his eyes requiring him to pay regular visits to Moorfields hospital, the next time it was his knee that was giving him recurring problems, a third time he was dealing with an (imaginary) intractable hernia, and so on. On the main street of the town where he lived however he was noted for his dapper appearance while each excuse allowed him to postpone repaying the debt for another few weeks or months until he was finally called to book. Such examples may serve to counterbalance an image of psychopaths as typically aggressive. The role can be played from any number of emotional postures.

13 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Narcissistic Personality Disorder “A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

with his or her expectations;

1. Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g. exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognised as superior without commensurate achievements);

7. Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognise or identify with the feelings and needs of others;

2. Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty or ideal love; 3. Believes that he or she is ‘special’ and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or highstatus people (or institutions); 4. Requires excessive admiration; 5. Has a sense of entitlement, i.e. unreasonable expectations of especially favourable treatment or automatic compliance

6. Is interpersonally exploitive, i.e. takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends;

8. Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her; 9. Shows arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes.” Again only five out of nine indicators are needed to be confident of the diagnosis. Some will be immediately evident. The “owner” of a Narcissistic Personality Disorder is quite frequently spoken of as ‘charismatic’ (a warning signal if ever there was one) and can be brilliantly and charmingly fluent when they first appear on the scene at intake interview.

14 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Following their appointment – possibly to a key position – they quickly win the admiration of colleagues. The fact that such individuals lie consistently is a great asset to them, a failing which will soon be overlooked, forgiven and even excused by fellow workers who by then have been seduced. Where they are in positions of power and influence such individuals will typically collect an inner circle of devotees around them. On a Board of Directors, members who are uncomfortable with the style of the resident Personality Disorder will begin to notice that they have been moved dangerously close to the fringes of the action, and will be increasingly hesitant to speak their mind for fear of making matters worse.

Case Study 4

Impression Management Joyce was a consultant in an IT training business. She fooled one of her business employers for many months while charging exorbitant fees. Bright and bubbly (all fake) she could play the mother hen role, dressed in grunge, with the employer’s staff, who adored her; and the seductive role, attractively dressed, with the trainees - who drooled accordingly. The master of impression management Joyce quietly plotted to bring down her employer’s business and take the most lucrative part for herself. The stuff of fiction? Not so. Cold hard fact and if the employer had not wised up late in the day he would have gone under. Personality disorders are superficially plausible, while being skilful at mimicking the empathy they don’t or can’t feel. Could one feel any sympathy with Joyce? It was the employer’s view later that, “If I had been brought up as she was, with the father she had and still has, I too would have been as keen to prove that I was as good as any boy, and I would have developed the same skills of deception and manipulation; and nourished the same contempt for those who were so easily conned.”

15 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Other Approaches W

hile the bulk of this White Paper focuses naturally on the impact of personality disorders in the workplace as witnessed in the conclusion to Case Study 4 some complimentary and more sympathetic approaches have emerged elsewhere. Four approaches of this

kind are illustrated below:

Michael Walton “All executives have the potential to become dysfunctional.” Dr Michael Walton is a chartered counselling and occupational psychologist. His focus is on executive (managerial) coaches, with the aim of helping them understand what they may be dealing with when a client has a Personality Disorder. The novelty in Walton’s approach is the division of the 10 Personality Disorders into three clusters, one of which is cluster B – egoistic and dramatic – characterised by leaders who often appear dramatic, emotional or erratic, likely to come over as aggressive, assured, competent, exploitative, and highly socially skilled. They will tend to adopt a high profile, image and impression management will be important to them and they are likely to want and look for attention, recognition and praise, while being interpersonally demanding and emotionally draining. “The appointment of cluster B types, who, from my experience, feature most prominently and strongly within the managerial ranks, should come with a health warning!” “They are also likely to be high achievers and, initially at least, very appealing as work colleagues.”

16 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Mind M

ind is a Mental Health Charity devoted to diagnosis and treatment for various forms of mental illness, and has published a booklet devoted to Personality Disorders from which the following has been excerpted.

“The word ‘personality’ refers to the pattern of thoughts, feelings and behaviour that makes each of us the individuals that we are. Generally speaking, personality doesn’t change very much, but it does develop as we go through different experiences in life, and as our circumstances change. “We mature with time, and our thinking, feelings and behaviour all change depending on circumstances. We are usually flexible enough to learn from past experiences and to change our behaviour to cope with life more effectively. If you have a Personality Disorder, you are likely to find this more difficult. However, with the right help you can learn to understand other people better, and cope better with social situations and relationships with other people.” “Your personality is the core of yourself, and to be told it is ‘disordered’ is very upsetting and undermining.” “Because your self-esteem is rather fragile”. “You will tend to act impulsively and recklessly, often without considering the consequences for yourself or for other people.”

17 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

The Mayo Clinic T

he Mayo Clinic is a not-for-profit medical practice and medical research group based in Rochester, Minnesota.

Celebrated the world over the Mayo Clinic draws attention to Personality Disorders as part of their Health Information services. They follow the DSM4 breakdown into three clusters where, similarly to Michael Walton, Cluster B lists the AntiSocial and Narcissistic Personality Disorders, as below. Cluster B personality disorders: •

Antisocial Personality Disorder

Disregard for others

Persistent lying or stealing

Recurring difficulties with the law

Repeatedly violating the rights of others

Aggressive, often violent behaviour

Disregard for the safety of self or others

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Fantasising about power, success and attractiveness

Exaggerating your achievements or talents

Expecting constant praise and admiration

Failing to recognise other people’s emotions and feelings

18 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

American Psychiatric Association I

n a recent (March 15 2013) issue the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published an article in Psychiatric News, Volume 48 Number 6 pp 21f, suggesting that:

Disregard for others’ pain in early childhood may predict antisocial behavior up to age 17. However, whether it predicts antisocial behavior beyond that age is un¬known. In its concluding discussion the article suggests that such behaviour may possibly lie rather on the autism spectrum than the anti-social, exactly as does Simon Baron Cohen in his book “The Science of Evil: on Empathy and Origins of Cruelty”. “Might it be possible to identify children who are likely to engage in antisocial behaviour as early as age 2? It may at first seem unlikely.” “Researchers who followed approximately 1,000 toddlers up to age 17 found a strong link between disregard for others’ pain early in life and later development of antisocial behavior.”

19 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Appendix 1

Channel 4’s “Psychopath Night” ith Channel 4’s 90-minute programme on December 13 2013 ‘psychopath’ could be said to have slipped into public awareness and common parlance in a new way. The Sunday Times Magazine was quick to follow suit two days later in Camilla Long’s weekly piece. The www. site weighed in early in 2014 along with Forbes magazine (2013) and the Harvard Business Review (January 9). This rapid process in the use of the term ‘psychopath’ has stripped it of any agreed meaning, in the same way that other lazy words like ‘iconic’ or ‘engagement’ have now lost their usefulness.


The Channel 4 program itself presents excerpts from ten well-known films with an analytic assessment by two FBI profilers of the accuracy of the portrayals. Pride of place among these movies goes to Heath Ledger’s portrayal of The Joker in The Dark Knight, followed by Anthony Hopkins’ Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs. Also ‘highly rated’ are Gordon Gecko in Wall Street, Matt Damon in The Charming Mr Ripley, a surgeon in Malice, and the main character in most of the Bond movies. In addition to the two FBI profilers the two strongest contributors to the program are Robert Hare, Professor James Fallon from University of California, Irvine and Oxford University Professor David Dunkley. Professors Fallon’s theory is that it takes three components (like a three-legged stool) to make a psychopath, (1) at the level of genetic traits; (2) a particular favoured area of brain activity; and (3) childhood trauma. A list in order of professions attractive to psychopaths is suggested as (1) bankers, (2) lawyers, (3) media personnel, (4) salespeople and (5) surgeons. A list of top psychopathic characteristics is given as lacking empathy and being charming, manipulative, callous, fearless, and grandiose.

20 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Appendix 2

DSM Categories uestions have been raised about potential institutional bias in DSM processes and other diagnostic and treatment initiatives. It has been said for example that the inclusion of PTSD in DSM4 in the mid-80s was partly motivated by the need to include the new diagnostic category of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) in order to enable returning Vietnam veterans to claim insurance support for their treatment. Such allegations, valid or groundless, have not been laid to rest.


What is incontrovertible is the storm of protest that has already arisen at the publication of the new DSM5 5. Health professionals need people to be “ill�. The question of potential self-interest on the part of clinicians in adding several new categories of mental illness can hardly be discounted. Commentators have argued strongly that many categories, old and new, of so-called mental illness pay too little regard to the contextual nature of much suffering; and that it helps no one to pathologise the lives of individuals who are by circumstances beyond their control disadvantaged, underprivileged, vulnerable and powerless in most of what pertains to their lives. To stigmatise their condition further with mental health labels may swell the clinician’s caseload, and may bring temporary palliative relief to the sufferer, but do not come close to the source of the problem. Somewhat in parallel is the growth of the IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) initiative in the UK driven initially by Lord Layard, himself a psychiatrist, that has attracted similar comments. A relevant fictional example could be the case of a 17 year old man, unable to find employment despite his best efforts, slipping into depression. The IAPT solution to deal with such cases has been to propose that we need another 10,000 counsellors trained in CBT. Apart from concern that CBT has grown as the treatment of choice in virtually every form of anxiety and depressive condition, against evidence that other approaches are equally effective (though less well marketed), and that a number of nurses for example and other qualified counsellors who are as proficient and experienced as anyone else in dealing with troubled patients are being disenfranchised. And of course, apart from all this, is the issue of cost. The money needed to fund IAPT aims could just as easily be put into job search and job revision for the 17year old which would at least come closer to dealing with his situation at source.

21 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Appendix 3

Bigthink igthink describes itself as a digital knowledge forum, and publishes blogs, articles and videos from the world’s top thinkers. Most recently (January 2014) it published an article under the title “Are You a Psychopath?” by M.E Thomas known to be Jamie Lund, a lawyer and self confessed sociopath. She makes two pertinent comments:


“Capitalism is set up to reward those who have no qualms about profiting off the labors of others.” “The acquisition, retention, and exploitation of power are what most motivate sociopaths. This much I know.” She also tries to make the point that it is always useful to have a psychopath, a hard man, on your team to see you through those difficult passages where emotion can be left aside in favour of force. The naive assumption behind this is that such a psychopath, your teammate, will be acting out of the same values of team spirit and brotherly love as you, whereas he or she will always and in every case be thinking first and foremost of themselves..

22 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Appendix 4

Forbes orbes, one of the world’s leading business magazines was even earlier on the scene (“The Disturbing Link Between Psychopathy and Capitalism”, April 2013) offering its pages to Victor Lipman, recently retired from the corporate world after 25 years with one of America’s largest life insurance companies. He comments that:


“Unfortunately, certain of these psychopathic qualities – in particular charm, charisma, grandiosity (which can be mistaken for vision or confidence) and the ability to ‘perform’ convincingly in one-on-one settings – are also qualities that can help one get ahead in the business world.” He goes on to report findings from the 2010 Babiak, Hare, Neumann study, concluding that “the study’s findings were disturbing, bearing out the large amount of anecdotal evidence the researchers had long been gathering.” The research showed that approximately 3% of those assessed in this management development program study scored in the psychopath range. Lipman’s own recommendations to avoid recruiting psychopaths in the first place are: “Internal succession planning; focus on verified, tangible results; and glean whatever you can about the moral and ethical character of a candidate” (as first published in Psychology Today.)

23 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Appendix 5

Harvard Business Review T

he Harvard Business Review in its recent HBR Blog Network (January 2014) states of psychopaths that:

‘their (psychopaths’) chameleon-like qualities mean they often reach top executive positions, especially in organizations that appreciate impression management, corporate gamesmanship, risk taking, domination, competitiveness, and assertiveness.” If this brief collection from a handful of business, media and print journalists over three short weeks following Channel 4’s December 13 2013 “Psychopath Night” is anything to go by we can expect a tide of such commentary over the coming months.

23 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

References “Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work� 2007, Paul Babiak, Ph.D. & Robert D. Hare Ph.D. Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-IV; 1994, American Psychiatric Association. Maia Szlavitz, Are Wall Street Traders Psychopathic?, 15 March 2012. Walton M. Derailment themes and personality variables. Counselling at Work 2011; (Winter) Cleckley H. The mask of sanity. Augusta: The CV Mosby Co; 1998. Horney K. The neurotic personality of our time. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1937 and Neurosis and Human growth. Hogan R, Hogan J. Assessing leadership: a view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment; 2001. Sperry L. Handbook of diagnosis and treatment. DSM-IV-TR personality disorders. New York: Brunner- Routledge; 2003.

24 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Babiak P, Hare, R. Snakes in suits. New York: HarperCollins; 2006. Furnham A. The elephant in the boardroom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. Hogan R. Personality and the fate of organizations. London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Publishers; 2007. Kets de Vries M. The leadership mystique. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 2006. Lowman, R Counselling and psychotherapy of work dysfunctions. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1993. Lubit R. Coping with toxic managers. Subordinates... and other difficult people. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2004. Dotlich D, Cairo P. Why CEOs fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;2003 Lenconi P. The five temptations of a CEO. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;1998

References Hamilton S, Micklethwait A. Greed and corporate failure. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. Mitchell L. Corporate irresponsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2001. Grey KL, Frieder L, Clark G. Corporate scandals. St Paul: Paragon House; 2005. Victor Lipman, The Disturbing Link Between Psycopathy and Leadership, 25th April 2013, published by Forbes Magazine. Camilla Long, Sunday Times Magazine, 15th December 2013. Kas Thomas, Bigthink, Are Sociopath? 5 January 2014



HBR Blog Network, Is Your Boss A Psycopath?, January 7, 2014.

25 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Bad Apples in the Barrel Personality Disorders at Work [eBook pub]

KEEP IN TOUCH @hpagroup

26 Bad Apples in the Barrel HPA Special Report

Bad apples in the barrel  

Some of the best known and most damaging scandals in the financial services and investment industries of the past decade, as likewise in exa...

Bad apples in the barrel  

Some of the best known and most damaging scandals in the financial services and investment industries of the past decade, as likewise in exa...