Page 1


Family Affairs Howard Bilton explains how setting up a Family Investment Company (FIC) can help keep you in control of your estate while liming stringent inheritance tax charges


obody likes to think about their own mortality. It is a surprising statistic that in the UK two thirds of the population die without leaving a will. I would presume that the figure in similar in other countries. In the majority of cases this is not the biggest problem in the world because there is not much of an estate to bequeath and what there is automatically goes to the next of kin – which is probably exactly in line with their wishes. For wealthier people, this is likely to be a major problem, but such persons normally take a little more care over their wealth and how it is passed on. The alternative to a will is a trust. Trusts can have huge advantages. They allow the distribution of the wealth to be controlled so that children get looked after but do not necessarily get a huge lump sum of cash which might cause them to go party mad and disincentivise them from having a career. Frequently, wealthy bread winners want their spouse to be well looked after but they do not want to run the risk of the spouse re-marrying and the new partner running off with all the money. They want the bulk of their capital to be preserved for the children or even grandchildren. All this can be achieved through trusts. Setting up a trust also forces the settlor to put his affairs in order early by transferring the assets to the trustees, so that on death there is little or nothing to be done, thereby saving those left behind the heartache, worry, expense and delays which are necessarily involved in administering an estate. Even a simple estate can cost up to six per cent of its value in fees to administer and take a minimum of two years to get sorted. This is not attractive for anybody – apart from the lawyers. Trusts provide a means of avoiding all that. The disadvantage of a trust is that it involves … well, a level of trust. Assets have to be passed over to trustees and the settlor loses control. In a previous article I wrote about the joys of private trust companies. These provide a method of setting up a trust and retaining a good degree of control. They remain attractive and are being used increasingly by the sophisticated client. There is another option. This is being increasingly used by UK domiciled persons who are restricted in their ability to transfer assets into trust by the 20 per cent lifetime inheritance tax charge which applies to substantial transfers. These entities will be attractive to a whole range of people because they are simple and easy to understand and relatively simple to set up and administer. They are known as Family Investment Companies (FICs) in the UK. We also refer to them as common law foundations as they are similar to the civil law foundations found in Lichtenstein and elsewhere but are much easier to understand by those brought up by in a common law system. FICs are companies. The usual form of a company is limited by shares. A share has three important characteristics being: a) The right to vote and therefore control the company; b) The right to receive income in the form of dividends; c) The right to the capital and the underlying assets owned by the company. 30

HK Golfer・SEP 2011

Usually a share will carry all three rights but it is quite possible for it to carry only one or two of these three. By splitting the rights and obligations we can create interesting results. For example, let us assume that Mr A is a UK national living in Hong Kong. He does not intend to spend the rest of this life in Hong Kong so is almost certainly UK domiciled and subject to UK IHT (inheritance tax) on his worldwide estate. His first preference would be to pass the assets into trust to avoid UK IHT but he cannot do so as the transfer to the trust would attract the 20 per cent charge. If he gives assets away to another individual seven years before his death then he avoids UK IHT and the 20 per cent charge entirely, but that would leave him without assets to look after himself and he would therefore be reliant on his beneficiaries. He would also lose control of those assets. Neither is attractive. Instead we set up an FIC. Mr A is issued with all the voting shares and therefore keeps total control. He also jointly retains, along with his wife, the income producing shares because, although he does not envisage spending the capital, he does want to ensure his lifestyle and spend the income. The capital shares can be given away to his wife and children while he is in good health. This structure means that all his assets are conveniently bundled together in one package so his executors do not have to try and find them, take control and administer them according to the will. UK IHT is massively reduced as he has given away the capital seven years before death. Clearly, the income producing shares do have some value but it is minor compared to the capital shares. Sweet and simple. This type of structure would be effective for most persons who are in danger of being subject to inheritance tax or estate duty in their home country or anywhere else in the world. There is HKGOLFER.COM

no estate duty in Hong Kong but just because you are resident in Hong Kong does not mean you are exempt from estate duty everywhere else in the world. Assets are frequently charged to estate duty in their country of location, irrespective of who owns them. If they are owned by a company then, because a company never dies, local estate duty is eradicated. Hong Kong residents will often have estate duty considerations in their own county of birth and anywhere they have invested, but this type of structure can remove those liabilities. The structure above will also be of relevance to those who have parents back in their home county with wealth to pass on. The plan can further be refined by using a company limited by guarantee or a company limited by both guarantee and shares. Most people will be familiar with companies limited by guarantee even if they do not know it, as this is the basis of most clubs and societies. When you join a club you become a member, rather than a shareholder, of a company limited by guarantee. That membership is retained only for as long as you are alive or for as long as the club (company) committee decides you are worthy. This type of company can be used as an FIC. Using an FIC avoids the need for a will and

This structure means that all his assets are conveniently bundled together in one package so his executors do not have to try and find them, take control and administer them according to the will.

probate on the underlying assets as they are all owned by the company. This type of structure is the latest big news in UK estate planning but can be used by anyone anywhere else in the world to good effect. It doesn’t remove the need for a will, as there will always be personal assets outside the structure, but it does provide a convenient and relatively cheap and simple method of dealing with the majority of a person’s estate. Howard Bilton is a UK Barrister, Professor or Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego and Chairman of the Sovereign Trust (Hong Kong) Ltd, which specialises in international and offshore tax planning.


Hong Kong’s Premier Golf Magazine delivered to your door at up to 60% off!

visit or call

3590 4153 today!


HK Golfer・SEP 2011



Howard Bilton explains how setting up a Family Investment Company (FIC) can help keep you in control of your estate while liming stringent i...