Canterbury development requirements study sustainability appraisal (amec 2012 06)

Page 40

Final 31

technologies employed. Such measures could help maximise positives that an increasing population can bring whilst minimising negative effects associated to increases in resource demand and land take. A level of compromise needs to be reached across the sustainability objectives, as scenarios which score highly on economy have significant negative effects on environmental objectives (i.e. - scenarios F, I and J) whereas scenarios that score more favourably on environment and resource use have a negative effect on the economy (i.e. – scenarios A and H). It is recommended that at this stage scenario E offers the greatest potential to achieve the appropriate balance (to optimise growth and minimise detrimental environmental effects). However, careful consideration would be required of the proposed location of development envisaged in the scenario to avoid sensitive sites, to optimise positive community effects and to take the opportunity to maximise the benefits of innovative sustainable design (by ensuring efficient use of land and resources) to mitigate any potentially significant negative impacts.

Š AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited June 2012 Doc Reg No. 16903rr19i2


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.