Page 1

Staat voor Registratie, Transparantie en Kwaliteit National Cardiovascular Data Registry WTC-gebouw Amsterdam Toren B - Level 2 Strawinskylaan 229 1077 XX Amsterdam Website: www.ncdr.nl

De NCDR is gecertificeerd voor het toetsbaar voorschrift NEN 7511-2; 2005 behorend bij NEN 7510;2004.

Rapportage pacemaker/icd implantaties 2011 (DIPR) juli/augustus 2012 Centrum 106: Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden

Alleen gegevens van ziekenhuizen die het hele jaar hebben aangeleverd en zijn geaudit (N=92).

1|Page


Basic pacemaker + ICD data Pacemakers (excluding IPGs with CRT functionality):

Total pacemaker units

2011-Center

2011-NL

174

10389

2011-Center

2011-NL

249 9 240

2394 519 1873

CRT devices (CRT-P + CRT-D):

Total CRT units Thereof, CRT-P CRT-D

ICD (excluding ICDs with CRT function)

Total ICD units

2011-Center

2011-NL

209

2931

Re-procedures within 90 days (IGZ quality indicator 6.4.2): Numbers represent information as made available to the NCDR 2011: Center:

Total number of procedures in 2011

Re-procedures within 90 days

Percentage

17878 635

598 29

3,3% 4,6%

Center = Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden

2|Page


Number of PM implants: center vs NL 350

Number of implanted pacemakers per center (2011)

Number of PM implantations

300

Center

250

200

150

100

50

0

Center Figure 1: Number of pacemaker implantations per center for 2011. In red, this center

3|Page


Age and gender DIPR: mean age at PM implant, male/female, 2011 Center

NL

76,5

74,2

80 75 70

64,1

64,0

male

female

65 60 55

Figure 2a shows the mean age of patients at pacemaker implants in male patients and female patients.

DIPR: pacemaker implantations 2011; gender distribution male

female

55,4% 60%

49,5%

50,5% 44,6%

50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Center

NL

Figure 2b shows the percentual distribution of pacemaker implantations in men versus women.

4|Page


DIPR 2011: PM implantations per age group; male/female; NL (%) 45% Male%

40%

Female%

35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Figure 3a (NL)

DIPR 2011: number of PM implantations per age group; male/female; center (%) 45% 40%

Male%

35%

Female%

30% 25% 20% 15% 10%

5% 0%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Figure 3b (Center) Figures show the percentual age distribution for PM implants, both for male and female patients.

5|Page


CRT versus non-CRT: pacemaker implantations Pacemaker implantations 2011: CRT-P versus non CRT-P device CRT-P; 4,8%

non CRT-P; 95,2%

Figure 5a (NL)

Pacemaker implantations 2011: CRT-P versus non CRT-P device; center CRT-P; 4,9%

non CRT-P; 95,1%

Figure 5b (Center) Figures show that only 5% (NL and Center) of all PM implants involve resynchronization therapy.

6|Page


CRT versus non-CRT: ICD implantations ICD implantations 2011: CRT-D versus non CRT-D device (NL)

CRT-D; 39,3% non CRT-D; 60,7%

Figure 6a (NL)

ICD implantations 2011: CRT-D versus non CRT-D device (center)

CRT-D; 53,5%

non CRT-D; 46,5%

Figure 6b (Center) Figures show that 39,3% (NL) versus 53,5% (Center) of all ICD implants involve resynchronization therapy.

7|Page

ncdr_dipr_rapportage_2011_106x  

http://www.hartcentrum.nl/images/ncdr_dipr_rapportage_2011_106x.pdf

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you