6 minute read

ANNUAL CHECK MATRIX

APPENDIX 9: ADVICE TO STAFF WHEN DELIVERING ONLINE LEARNING

1. Staff should use either Zoom or Google Meet for the video/voice elements of their online lessons. The links to these meetings should not be shared publicly. 2. If delivering online lessons from home, staff should position themselves in a non-private space against a background that is neutral (or use a virtual background to the same effect). 3. Staff should always register attendance at their lessons and enter an Engage Daybook entry for non-attendees where this is appropriate. 4. All communication with students should be through the official school channels: school email, Engage, Google Classroom etc. Staff should never communicate with students using private messaging services. 5. Staff should ensure that communication with students takes place during normal working hours (0740 - 1800). 6. Recording of online lessons is set to ‘always on’ under the school’s Zoom and Google accounts to ensure that staff and students are protected. The footage is stored in the school’s cloud. 7. Where one-to-one or one-to-two online sessions are necessary, the following safeguards should be put in place: ○ Staff should look at alternatives, such as an open Google Doc for a discussion or a small group meeting ○ Staff should inform their line manager about the session and its purpose ○ Students should be told to inform their parents of the meeting by the staff member ○ Staff must make it clear at the start of the meeting that either party can stop the meeting whenever they like, without the need to provide a reason for doing so 8. The reporting mechanisms for safeguarding remain exactly the same online as offline. Staff with any concerns should report them to a SO or to the DSL and enter the incident on

Advertisement

CPOMS.

All of the above measures are in place for the protection of staff and children whilst learning and teaching online. For our community’s protection, members of the safeguarding team reserve the right to view the records of online learning at any time.

APPENDIX 10: WHOLE SCHOOL CASE CONFERENCE (WSCC) PROTOCOL

The Whole School Case Conference (WSCC):

A meeting to review students posing the highest level of safeguarding and wellbeing concerns relating to risk or needs, and decide on appropriate safeguarding actions.

WSCC Committee Members:

The Designated Safeguarding Focal Point (DSFP), Deputy Designated Safeguarding Focal Point (DDSFP), Upper and Lower School Designated Safeguarding Leads (DSLs), Safeguarding Officers (SO) and School Counsellors make up the core committee and attend the weekly Wednesday meetings as shown below:

❏ Whole School representatives will attend the entirety of the meeting ❏ Upper School (US) representatives attend 0800 - 0900 ❏ Boarding (US) 0910-0925 ❏ Boarding (LS) 0925-0930 ❏ Lower School (LS) representatives attend at 0925 - 0945

School sector Representation

Whole School

Boarding Michael Reddish - DSFP Kelly Adjei - DDSFP Nurse A - Senior Nurse Jon Stuart - Counsellor Sapphira Beaudin - Counsellor

Rich Walter - SO for Boarding Ruth Cowap - DSO for Boarding

Lower School

Upper School Mike Godwin - DSL for Lower School Paul Beach - SO for Lower School Matthew Parker - SO for Pre-Prep Kate Umpleby - SO for EYC

Lealand Pearce - DSL for US Adam Pape - SO for Prep Kathry Gavin - SO for Sixth Form Sapphira Beaudin - SO for SR5

N.B. SO Khanitha Prawichen attends the WSCC on an as needed basis when liaison with Thai external agencies is required.

Which students are discussed?

Students that present with the highest level of wellbeing and safeguarding need or risk are discussed at WSCC. These students are RAG-rated as RED, AMBER or GREEN on CPOMS and are discussed as outlined in the following table at the following frequencies:

Rating Concern

RED Student appears to be at risk of immediate/imminent serious harm.

Frequency of WSCC review

Weekly with likely significant intervention/monitoring between WSCC meetings.

AMBER Student appears to be at risk of harm, but not imminent and possibly less serious. Fortnightly with appropriate intervention/monitoring between.

GREEN Concerns about the wellbeing/safety of a student, which if not addressed, may develop. Half-termly with appropriate intervention/monitoring between.

Seriousness according to levels of wellbeing +/-safeguarding concern/need/risk is determined based upon the information provided. This can and will change and move across the spectrum at any time and without notice.

Additionally, all students who have had safeguarding or health and wellbeing incidents entered onto CPOMS in the 7 days preceding the WSCC, regardless of whether they are RAG-rated, are categorised as BLUE for the purpose of the WSCC. These will be screened by all attendees prior to the meeting and those posing most concern will be discussed. This ensures we ‘catch all’. If RAG-rating of these students is considered necessary, this is implemented during the WSCC.

Staff Children

There are multiple staff children within the school; if they require discussion at the WSCC, they will be treated as fairly and confidentially as non-staff children are. It must also be recognised that many staff attending the WSCC also have children within the school. In the instance that their child requires discussion within the WSCC forum, the following steps will be taken: ❏ A separate discussion will be held just prior to or after the WSCC, involving only those absolutely necessary to the discussion, and in the absence of the staff parent. ❏ Minutes of this meeting will be captured directly onto the staff child’s CPOMS record with the ‘WSCC’ tag attached.

Meeting Protocol

On the day prior to the WSCC, the DDSFP will distribute a CPOMS-generated report listing all students RAG-rated RED and AMBER in the preceding week (to ensure AMBER students are reviewed at the WSCC at the specified fortnightly frequency, the DDSFP will always cross-reference the previous week’s report). BLUE students will also be included in this report to enable screening by attendees and discussion at the WSCC if necessary.

Review of GREEN students will be conducted by the DSLs on a half termly basis (minimum) with the pastoral and/or safeguarding teams; minutes of these reviews will be captured on CPOMS.

Recording Meeting Minutes

Minutes typed during the meeting are entered directly into each student’s CPOMS record with a ‘WSCC’ tag attached - these are automatically distributed to the attendees of the WSCC plus the relevant pastoral leaders for each student.

Ensuring Follow Up

The Upper School DSL will meet bi-weekly with each of the Heads of Phase who will scrutinise recent CPOMS actions and incidents to ensure all active cases have been actioned appropriately as well as review the pastoral and safeguarding concerns of their phase.

The Lower School DSL will meet every 3 weeks with Heads of Phase to explore incidents and follow up on actions. In addition, the DSL will attend YGL meetings once per half term or every 5 weeks to ensure each case has been actioned and (if necessary) learnings can be taken from and forward.

APPENDIX 11: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPREHENSION

Please print out this page and return it, signed, to the Human Resources Department.

I have read, understand and agree to abide by the Harrow Bangkok Safeguarding Policy and the Staff Safeguarding Code of Conduct. I acknowledge that their scope covers both my private and professional life.

I understand that if I do not follow the guidance laid out therein, I will be subject to disciplinary action which may result in dismissal and/or my actions being reported to the police.

Full name (capitals, please) :

Signed: _________________________ Date: _______________

Return this signed page to HR – please keep the rest of the document for your own records.

Note that the latest version of the Safeguarding Policy is posted on the external website and is also available through the Staff Portal.

ANNUAL CHECK MATRIX

Policy: Safeguarding policy Original held here: https://goo.gl/ReJUHg

Applies to:

Author(s):

All staff, visitors, volunteers, contractors, governors, guests, residents etc.

Wellbeing Lead; DIrector of Hr; Principal Deputy Head

Governor approval: Yes – board-level approval

Annual review: I certify that I have reviewed this policy, and verify that, to the best of my knowledge, it reflects current legislation and is in accordance with the wishes of the governing body and Head Master.

Reviewer to enter initials and appropriate date:

TJJ 20/11/2017; TJJ 4/7/2018; TJJ 14/3/2019; TJJ 10/5/2019; TJJ 1/10/2019; TJJ 1/6/2020; TJJ 20/11/2020, JL 25/1/2021; JK 10/02/2021: JK,MRE,KAD August 2021; MRE & KAD 07/01/2022;

This article is from: