Small Towns, Big Fight for Continued Access to Care, continued from page 2 Calmus continued, “Rural Americans tend to be older, sicker, poorer than their urban counterparts.” She continued, “We know from MedPAC that at least since 2016, Medicare margins have been, on average, negative. By definition, rural hospitals are providing that frontline care, and that’s where negative margins are even worse.” Calmus said the bad debt cuts have been particuDiane R. Calmus larly hard for rural hospitals for a couple of key reasons. Prior to the Affordable Care Act, hospitals could write off a significant portion of their bad debt. However, since ACA was supposed to expand health insurance to everyone, the theory was bad debt would drop dramatically. Therefore, a bad debt cut was put in place. When Medicaid expansion was overruled by the Supreme Court, it left a coverage gap for a lot of Americans, which has been disproportionately felt by rural hospitals with a smaller patient census to offset uninsured care. Even when serving patients with insurance, rural hospitals often have been left with bad debt since paying a $5,000 deductible is nearly impossible for many people. The very nature of frontline care
means that rural hospitals often stabilize a patient before sending that individual to an urban counterpart for more specialized treatment. Rural hospitals have found their services fall into the ‘deductible’ part of patient care, whereas insurance has kicked in by the time the patient is transferred to the larger urban center for continued services. “We’ve seen a 50 percent increase in bad debt at rural hospitals that we haven’t seen at urban hospitals,” noted Calmus. Sequestration is another area where federal cuts have made it increasingly difficult for some rural hospitals to keep their doors open. “Critical Access Hospitals were paid 101 percent the cost of providing care. That was cut by 2 percent by the sequester. If you do the not-so-difficult math, they are not being paid the cost of care,” Calmus said of the cost deficit faced by CAH-designated facilities. The ‘death by a thousand cuts’ reality has taken a steep toll on rural hospitals across the country. “From 2018, 46 percent of rural hospitals were operating at a loss. That’s up from 44 percent in 2017 and 40 percent the year before that,” outlined Calmus. Yet another threat to access is a lack of providers. “Recruitment and retention of physicians is always an issue for rural hospitals,” said Calmus. This is particularly true for a number of specialties. “Between 2004 and 2014, we’ve seen more than 200 rural communities lose their
hospital-based obstetrics. Now, the majority of rural counties don’t actually have a place to deliver a baby,” she continued. Coinciding with the decrease in obstetric services has been an increase in precipitous deliveries with more rural babies delivered at home, in ERs, or in the back of an ambulance or in a car en route to a larger facility. On a more positive note, Calmus said, “340B is one of the bright spots in rural healthcare.” In addition to keeping the doors open, she said a number of hospitals are using the 340B money in innovative ways to improve care delivery … and, she stressed, the 340B money isn’t paid for by taxpayers. “The threats to 340B are frequent. We ‘re working constantly to educate legislators and the administration on how well hospitals are using this money,” she admitted. Happily, there are plenty of success stories to share. “Rural hospitals are uniquely positioned to know their patients in a way doctors in urban communities can’t,” she pointed out. Calmus noted one hospital in Kansas kept seeing a family in the emergency room because they had an infestation of bed bugs. Using just a few 340B dollars took care of the problem at a fraction of the cost of an ER visit. Similarly, another patient was having a hard time controlling his diabetes. Tapping into resources to pay his electric bill meant his insulin could be properly refrigerated and therefore more effective.
Calmus said rural hospitals have become incubators for innovative practice. “In so many ways, it’s the rural hospitals who are figuring out how to do more with less,” she pointed out, adding that work mirrors the national call to deliver highvalue care in the most cost-effective manner possible. Despite the many ongoing threats to the nation’s rural healthcare facilities, Calmus said there is much to be excited about, as well. “Rural America is a great place to practice medicine in the cradleto-grave model so many providers say they want to practice.”
Keep your finger on the pulse of Arkansas’ healthcare industry. SUBSCRIBE TODAY to begin receiving Arkansas Medical News in print or on your tablet or smartphone ArkansasMedicalNews.com
Stephanie Stank Cell: 870.974.3777 6
Arkansas Medical News March-April 2019