Lars MĂźller Publishers
Edited by Jochen Becker, Katrin Klingan, Stephan Lanz, Kathrin Wildner
GLOBAL PRAYERS Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City
Urban studies as well as artistic productions have long viewed religion and urbanity as mutually exclusive. Global Prayers, in contrast, puts the case for just such UHFLSURFDOLQĂ€XHQFHV7KHSXEOLFDWLRQLVEDVHGRQWKHZRUN of an international network of researchers as well as artists, focusing on diverse urban assemblages and religious FRPPXQLWLHV7KHFRQWULEXWLRQVUHFRUGWKHLUPRYHPHQWV and critically engage with them. 7KHUHVHDUFKDQGFXOWXUDOSURMHFWGlobal Prayers examines questions of redemption and liberation in the cities of the world. New religious practices permeate public spaces and the cultural scenes of these metropolises. Religious communities inscribe themselves into urban life acoustically, W\SRJUDSKLFDOO\ DQG DUFKLWHFWXUDOO\ 7KH\ JHQHUDWH WKHLU own aesthetics and forms of consumption. metroZones 13
Becker | Klingan | Lanz | Wildner (Eds.)
Lars MĂźller Publishers
GLOBAL PRAYERS Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City
metroZones 13 Edited by Jochen Becker, Katrin Klingan, Stephan Lanz, Kathrin Wildner A book by metroZones, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, and Europa-Universit채t Viadrina Lars M체ller Publishers
Forms of Knowledge Production An Introduction BERND M. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF THE HAUS DER KULTUREN DER WELT
Anyone entering the foyer of the Haus der Kulturen der Welt (HKW) at the end of February
larization of religious thought, an idea which can also be found in the realization of the intelOHFWXDOFRQFHSWRIWKH8QLWHG1DWLRQV,WZDVFRQFHLYHGDVDORFDWLRQZKHUHWKHCommunio of the global community could be addressed. During the course of the Forum the tent structure inscribed itself into the building. In the
FKDUDFWHUQDPHO\WKHZRUOGFRPPXQLW\DVDZKROH,QVWHDGWKHIUDJLOLW\DQGHSKHPHUDOLW\ RIWKHWHQWVWUXFWXUHDOOXGHGWRWKHWHPSRUDU\XVHRIVSDFHE\UHOLJLRXVJURXSVLQ%HUOLQDW WKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKHWZHQW\Â¿UVWFHQWXU\
$VWKHJURXSPHWUR=RQHVSURSRVHGGlobal PrayersWRWKH+.:LQDVDMRLQWSURMHFW WKHFRQQHFWLRQWRRXURZQZRUNZDVLPPHGLDWHO\DSSDUHQW2QWKHEDVLVRIFRRSHUDWLRQ
7KHSUREOHPRI:HVWHUQFRQFHSWIRUPDWLRQFDQEHWUDFHGEDFNWRDQHSLVWHPRORJLFDO FULVLVZLWKZKLFKFODVVLFDOVFLHQFHKDVEHHQFRQIURQWHGIRUVRPHFRQVLGHUDEOHWLPH7KLV has a number of causes.
D 7KHQRWLRQRIIUHHGRPIROORZLQJWKH(QOLJKWHQPHQWWKHVFLHQFHVVXFFHVVIXOO\IRXJKW WKHDWWDFNVRIUHOLJLRXVDQGVHFXODUSRZHUVHVWDEOLVKLQJWKHIUHHGRPWRUHVHDUFK6FLHQFH 5
WRRN WKH OLEHUW\ RI GHYHORSLQJ LWV RZQ DVVHVVPHQW DQG HYDOXDWLRQ FULWHULD +RZHYHU WKLV
DSSOLFDWLRQRULHQWHG QDWXUDO VFLHQFHV ZHUH DEOH WR SDUWLDOO\ FRPSHQVDWH IRU WKLV ORVV RI
7KLV UHVHDUFK DSSURDFK LV WUDQVODWHG LQWR WKH SUHVHQWDWLRQ RI Global Prayers, as set in
DQGOHFWXUHVWKURXJKWKHLUSHUFHSWXDODQGFRJQLWLYHDFWLRQV7KXVWKHGlobal Prayers re-
F 7KH FODLP WR XQLYHUVDOLW\ LQ WKH ZDNH RI SRVWFRORQLDO GLVFRXUVHV WKH FODLPV WR KHJH-
PRQ\RI:HVWHUQWKRXJKWDQGNQRZOHGJHV\VWHPVDQGWKXVWKHLUFODLPWRXQLYHUVDOLW\DUH ignored knowledge systems. At the same time, this has led to a re-examination of oneâ€™s own NQRZOHGJHSURGXFWLRQ
7KH DIRUHPHQWLRQHG SRLQWV FRQWULEXWH WR WKH IDFW WKDW WKH LQFUHDVLQJ VRFLDO FRPSOH[LW\ VKDSHGE\WKHG\QDPLFVRIFXOWXUDOHFRQRPLFDQGVRFLDOJOREDOL]DWLRQSURFHVVHVFDQQR
How does the Global PrayersSURMHFWGHDOZLWKWKLVVLWXDWLRQ")LUVWO\E\EULQJLQJWRJHWK-
ERG\ RI NQRZOHGJH FROOHFWHG KHUHÂ²ZLWKRXW WKH WUDQVSDUHQF\ RI WKH NQRZOHGJHÂ¶V RULJLQV
LQWHUWZLQHGRQDQHTXDOIRRWLQJ$VHSDUDWHFDWHJRU\RIFRPPHQWDULHVVHOIFULWLFDOO\ UHÃ€HFW VWURQJHUMRXUQDOLVWLFDSSURDFKDQÂ³$WODVÂ´LOOXPLQDWHVWKHPHWURSROLVHVH[DPLQHGLQWKH
being obscured in any way.
GHUVRIVFLHQFHZDVVXFFHVVIXOO\Â¿QDQFHG)LQDOO\,ZRXOGOLNHWRWKDQN.DWULQ.OLQJDQ behalf of the HKW.
TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN BY COLIN SHEPHERD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Negotiation as a Research Methodology 5
BERND M. SCHERER
Forms of Knowledge Production. An Introduction 12
Editorial Notes 226
Assembling Global Prayers in the City: An Attempt to Repopulate Urban Theory with Religion 48
Global Prayers, Migration, Post-migration 64
KATRIN KLINGAN AND JOHANNES ISMAIEL-WENDT
5 XLQVDQG&RQVWUXFWLRQ&UXFLÂż[HVDQG)ODJV7KH3ROLWLFDO6HFWDULDQ6SDWLDOLW\ of a Frontier in Beirut DAVID GARBIN
Worshiping at the Golden Age Hotel: Transnational Networks, Economy, Religion, and Migration of the Congolese in Istanbul
Dramaturgies of Spatial and Temporal Interferenceâ€”or, How to Curate a Forum for the Global Prayers Research Project 92
HIBA BOU AKAR
Global Prayers in â€œGlobal Citiesâ€?: Notes on Afro-Christian Spatiality in Atlanta and London
On Research with Global Prayers
Multi-Religious Societies and the Right to the City: The Case of the Mosque of al-Khandaq al-Ghamiq in Beirut
EDITORIAL ESSAYS 16
HIDAYET TUKSAL IN CONVERSATION WITH CANDAN YILDIZ
Religious Women in Istanbul
VISUAL ESSAYS 1
Stripped Religion Industries: Nigerian Perspectives on Las Vegas, and Back Again
PAOLA YACOUB, SURABHI SHARMA, SEVGI ORTAĂ‡, KATJA REICHARD, CHRISTIAN HANUSSEK, MAGDALENA KALLENBERGER / DOROTHEA NOLD
Global Prayersâ€”Posters 122
SABINE BITTER AND HELMUT WEBER
â€œThere is no answer to any of these thingsâ€?: Religious Street Politics in Tehran 1978ff. 314
DECONSTRUCTING THE FUNDAMENTALIST CITY? 144
HENGAMEH GOLESTAN AND SANDRA SCHĂ„FER
FILIP DE BOECK
Cemetery State 322
How to Fabricate Heroes?
The Arab â€œSpringâ€? and the Rise of the Fundamentalist City 328
5 HOLJLRXVO\8UEDQDQG)DLWKLQWKH&LW\5HĂ€HFWLRQVRQWKH0RYHPHQWV of the Youth in Central Africa and Southeast Asia
STAGING STREET POLITICS
Secular Resistance and First Post-Secular Steps: How Berlin Deals with Global Prayers
Performing Crowds: The Circulative Urban Forms of the Tariqa Alawiya Youth Movement in Contemporary Indonesia
Redeeming Urban Spaces: The Ambivalence of Building a Pentecostal City in Lagos, Nigeria
Techniques of Inattention: The Mediality of Loudspeakers in Nigeria
ADĂ‰ BANTU IN CONVERSATION WITH SABRINA DITTUS
â€œWhen you are in an environment like Lagos, you need a connection to something higher, to make meaning out of all the madness around you.â€? 376
Observing Religion, Performing Politics: The Chhath Puja and the Ganpati Mahotsav in Mumbai
Unfold = Negotiate, Localize, and Assemble. How Urban Studies &DQ([DPLQH5HOLJLRQ
VISUAL ESSAYS 2 CAMILO JOSĂ‰ VERGARA
Cities Between Heaven and Hell 590
Mass-Produced Faith 438
Lessons From â€œGlobal Prayersâ€?: How Religion Takes Place in the City
Churches: A Photographic Record of Secular Buildings Converted into Places of Worship in the Greater London Area 430
The Pious City: Comments on the Unusual Urban
The Vision God Gave the Pastor 420
FILIP DE BOECK
Global Prayers: How the Academy and the Arts Circumambulate the City
GEORGE JOSE TALKS TO STEPHAN LANZ, KATHRIN WILDNER, AND JOCHEN BECKER
From Padre Mugica to Santa Muerte? Liberation Spirits and Religious Mutations in Urban Space in Latin America
RONALD DĂœKER AND STEFANIE PETER
Atlanta, Beirut, Berlin, Cairo, Istanbul, Jakarta, Kinshasa, Lagos, 0H[LFR&LW\0XPEDL5LRGH-DQHLUR7HKUDQ
INCLUDING A VISUAL ESSAY:
Speaking in Tongues: Crowds, Assistants, and Miracles
POPULAR CULTURES OF CONVERSION 448
Religion, Popular Culture, and the City: Pentecostalism, Carnival and Carioca Funk in Rio de Janeiro
AERNOUT MIK AND MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN IN CONVERSATION WITH JOCHEN BECKER
AMANDA S. A. DIAS
Ă–ZGE AKTAĹž AND EDA ĂœNLĂœ-YĂœCESĂ–Y
The Renegotiation of Boundaries between Islam and the â€œModernâ€?: Perceptions of Religious Women in Istanbul 528
Christian Hymns and Noises in Beirut 542
Gheee-Zuss: The Sonic Materialities of Belief
Editorial Notes JOCHEN BECKER, KATRIN KLINGAN, STEPHAN LANZ, KATHRIN WILDNER
This book explores Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City from a trans-
Global Prayers, create cross-references between individual studies, and clarify the epistemic
disciplinary urban studies perspective, focusing on the interactions and interrelations
between the urban sphere and those religious movements that have grown to become
These clusters and formats are supplemented by an essayistic atlas that presents all the cities
researched, highlighting characteristic patterns in the way the urban and the religious are
approaches of research and representation that inform the project Global Prayers: Redemp-
tion and Liberation in the City.,WLVQRWRQO\WKHFRQYHQWLRQDOERXQGDULHVEHWZHHQVFLHQWLÂżF
The multi-perspective introductions, visual essays, commentaries following the thematic
disciplines (social and cultural sciences, ethnography, geography, religious studies, archi-
chapters, and the essayistic atlas, all aim to create connections between the narrations of
tecture, and sound studies) that are transgressed here, but also those between the sciences
The book, structured to form several layers, contains theoretical, empirical, and essayistic texts, several interviews, and visual essays of different lengths and in various â€œlanguagesâ€?:
Introductory theoretical and conceptual texts by the editorial and supervisory team of
positioned within urban theory? What concepts guide its methodological transdisciplinari-
cussing the complexity of ways in which the city and religion, urbanity and religiosity, are
Global Prayers RXWOLQH WKH ÂżHOG RI UHVHDUFK IURP YDULRXV SHUVSHFWLYHV KRZ LV WKH ERRN
seeks to create a conceptual, methodological, and empirical basis for recording and dis-
ty? What artistic and curatorial strategies are applied? What institutional settings charac-
terize the Global Prayers laboratory?
The complex structure of the book and the diverse formats of the contributions to it, thus,
chapters: â€œDeconstructing the Fundamentalist City?,â€? â€œStaging Street Politics,â€? and â€œPopXODU&XOWXUHVRI&RQYHUVLRQÂ´'XO\WDNLQJLQWRDFFRXQWWKHGLIIHULQJVFDOHVRISURGXFWLRQRI
shows how, at a global level, any distinct boundaries between the secular and the sacred
the urban in Lagos, Kinshasa, Istanbul, Beirut, Mumbai, Jakarta, Rio de Janeiro, Mexico
that were once established in the modern city are now becoming increasingly unstable,
City, Buenos Aires, Atlanta, Amsterdam, and Berlin, and on the routes between these cities,
UHĂ€HFWQRWVROHO\WKHPXOWLSHUVSHFWLYHUHVHDUFKDSSURDFKRIGlobal Prayers, but also the
the case studies consistently examine the question both of an urban religion in the making
research projects of Global Prayers.
6HWWLQJ RXW IURP YDULRXV ÂżHOGV RI NQRZOHGJHÂ˛XUEDQ WKHRU\ UHOLJLRXV VWXGLHV DQG SRVW
JULY 2013 TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN BY TIM JONES
Assembling Global Prayers in the City: An Attempt to Repopulate Urban Theory with Religion STEPHAN LANZ
For decades, urban theoryâ€™s prevailing point of reference was the patterns of development in â€œa few wealthy citiesâ€? (Robinson 2006: 167) in North America and Western Europe. As a way of distancing itself from this approach, Space//Troubles (Becker and Lanz 2003), the
research design of Global Prayers: Redemption and Liberation in the City. 2XUÂżQGLQJV DUHQRZSUHVHQWHGLQWKLVERRNWKHWKLUWHHQWKYROXPHRIWKHPHWUR=RQHVVHULHVDQGKHUH
I would like to offer an overview and discuss the basic assumptions, theoretical positions, research strategies, and results so far. PROGRAMMATIC BASIS OF THE METROZONES SERIES
$VZHQRWHGLQWKHPHWUR=RQHVVHULHVIRXQGLQJZRUNVKRSDQGWKHÂżUVWYROXPHÂśVLQWURGXFtion (see Lanz 2003), urban developments in the cities in the Global South cannot be analyzed separately from those in the Global North, and vice versa. This has been the case, at the latest, since the age of colonization when European city planning was forcibly globalL]HGDVUDFLVWXUEDQVWUXFWXUHVDQGWKHJURZLQJĂ€RZVRISHRSOHFDSLWDOJRRGVDQGFXOWXUDO practices were linked in the cities of the colonizers and the colonized around the world. For example, informal urban economies and the production of space or division of urban social spaces in â€œfeudal-like islands of governanceâ€? (ibid.: 23), where each is subject to
WKHLURZQUXOHVRUDIÂżOLDWLRQVDUHQRWDVSHFLDOSKHQRPHQRQLQWKHDOOHJHGO\FKDRWLFFLWLHV of the South. Instead, these can be found as characteristic features in the present forms of 16
urbanization on a global level. For this reason, cities in the Global North and South are not incommensurable, but need to be regarded as â€œâ€˜neighborsâ€™ in a single metropolitan spaceâ€?
this process? Which rationalities, imaginations, and aspirations form the basis of this process? And what is the framework of power relations around it? Finally, what urban con-
ON RELIGIONâ€™S ALLEGED DISAPPEARANCE IN WESTERN INDUSTRIAL CITIES
to the Global North. Rather, they follow independent paths to modernization, which do
not culminate in some catch-up sense with the model of a Western or even European city.
these analytical assumptions and strategic maneuvers, we found â€œreligionâ€? emerging as a
Traditionally, urban studies analysis, based on modernization theories, focuses on issues
RI JRYHUQDQFH DQG LQIUDVWUXFWXUH GHÂżFLWV SRYHUW\ DQG YLROHQW FRQĂ€LFW WKH G\QDPLFV RI rapid urbanization and environmental problems. Such a focus, though, constructs cities
priority topic in the focus of our urban analyses. â€œReligionâ€? was increasingly evident in a
Hindu nationalists (Eckert 2003), the boom in revivalist churches in the favelas of Rio de Ja-
tion, is deemed to be a worthy goal. In particular, the normative transfer of Western con-
neiro (Martins 2004), multi-faceted urban Islamism in Istanbul (cf. Tugal 2005), and â€œstreet
ceptsâ€”development, modernity, state, civil societyâ€”to African cities results in an image of
politicsâ€? in the wake of the Iranian Revolution in Tehran (Bayat 2006). With critical urban
an irrational urban Africa falling back from colonial modernity into pre-colonial barbarism
studies largely concentrating on the political and economic logics of urbanization in cities
(Mbembe and Nutall 2004). However, as overlapping â€œpalimpsests of colonization, de- re-
in the North, such processes had hardly been considered at that time. Where critical urban
and neo-colonizationâ€? (De Boeck 2002: 244), these cities are pursuing their own paths of
studies did deal with religion, it was usually discussed as the practice of supposedly back-
modernization where seemingly contrary rationalities between â€œmodernityâ€? and â€œtraditionâ€?
ward migrants or the urban poor and located within a conceptually contained urban space,
are interlinked in many diverse ways. Hence, in principle, we fully subscribe to Ananya
Royâ€™s (2009: 828) later apodictic statement that â€œ[t]he study of the 21st century metropolis
of â€œsacredâ€? or â€œfundamentalistâ€? cities.
is inevitably a study of modernity.â€?
At that time, though, to a certain extent in the wake of Western critical urban studies and
7KH PHWUR=RQHV VHULHV DGRSWHG WKLUG WKH VWUDWHJLF PDQHXYHU RI VKLIWLQJ WKH PDLQstream perspective to enable us to adequately record present global forms of modernization, describe them, and learn to understand them. The objective was to avoid taking the
hardly noticed by it, various scholars interested in the agency of the â€œurban subaltern in the global Southâ€? (Bayat 2000) had already highlighted the growing importance of religion in the context of everyday urban practices in Middle Eastern cities such as Tehran or Cairo (Bayat 1997), in diverse African cities (Simone 1994, 2001) or in (Latin) American metropolises such
ity. Rather, our urban analyses looked back to the â€œNorthâ€? from the incomparably more
as New York or Rio de Janeiro (Orsi 1999a; Birman 2003). Nonetheless, it was a paper by
dynamic urban realities discursively bound to the Global South and which determine
Mike Davis tellingly entitled â€œPlanet of Slumsâ€? (2004) which brought the growing importance
the conditions of the majority of the global population. As a â€œtactical maneuverâ€? (Sim-
of new religious movements in the cities of the Global South to the attention of urban studies,
one 2010: 279), this shift in perspective does not, of course, equate with assuming that
though his focus was less on them as religious, than as political and social actors. Given the
the urbanism of the global South exists in some ontological sense. The valid comparison
traditional assumptions in urban theory, Davisâ€™s dramatic hypothesis of God dying in the cit-
here is far closer to AbdouMaliq Simoneâ€™s notion of â€œblack urbanismâ€? understood as
ies of the industrial revolution and only then resurrecting in the post-industrial cities of devel-
an â€œinventive methodologyâ€? aimed at bringing â€œcertain dimensions of urban life from
oping countries (ibid.: 30) seemed quite cogent, as did his notion of religious groups replacing
the periphery into a clearer view.â€? Here, too, rather than arguing that blackness consti-
left-wing movements in the global slums. However, Davisâ€™s apocalyptic approach posited a
tutes â€œa particular kind of urbanism,â€? the central dimension in this conceptual approach
problematic causal link between the observed urban manifestations of the religious and the
amongst different cities and urban experiences that otherwise would have no readily available means of conceptualization,â€? (ibid.). Not only are South and North just as little
politico-economic transformations of the cities of the South in the wake of global neoliberalism, thus associating such manifestations with the urban poorâ€™s ideological seduction. Hence,
essentialist categories as â€œblackness,â€? but neither should be principally understood as
nition of religion as opium for the people.
geographical. Instead, following Stuart Hallâ€™s (1992) notion of â€œthe West and the rest,â€?
However, the history of early industrial cities shows that even the radical phase of modern-
they should be regarded as mutually conditioning relational elements in one single discourse formation. Hence, starting from everyday urban life beyond the model of the
ization fueled by industrialization where, according to Davis, God had â€œdied,â€? was charac-
WHUL]HGE\DUHOLJLRXVG\QDPLFZKRVHHIIHFWVVWLOOKDYHDQLQĂ€XHQFHWRGD\7KHHDUO\LQGXVtrial cities in the United States and Britain, particularly, served as laboratories for religious
individual concrete urban settings: how is the city (re-)produced â€œon the groundâ€? in a
innovations of all possible political, cultural, and social nuances certainly comparable to
continuous process? What are the forces, practices, materials, and actors interacting in
those nowadays. For example, middle-class fears in the rapidly growing migrant United
States cities in the nineteenth century generated the reactionary â€œcharity movement,â€?
has necessitated, encouraged, or simply made possible a tremendous explosion of religious
which set out to discipline the supposedly dangerous proletarian masses through the power
innovation and experimentationâ€? (Orsi 1999b: 45). In a certain sense, this development
of religion. On the other hand, religious idealists became involved in the progressive â€œsocial
seems to be repeated in the major change from the industrial to post-industrial city starting
gospelâ€? movement, active in calling for structural improvements in the catastrophic condi-
from the last third of the twentieth century (see Beaumont and Baker 2011a).
tions in the overcrowded working-class districts. The â€œblack churches,â€? in turn, developed into a location for religiously motivated political activism in the struggle against the racist
BLIND SPOTS IN URBAN THEORY
exclusion of Afro-American communities from public spaces (Brooks-Higginbotham 1993).
Urban theory, then, considers that modern urbanity, as the end product of the cityâ€™s long
Two Christian organizations which still exist today were also founded in mid-nineteenth
spiritual decline, can be equated with secularity. However, this general assumption is less
century London, and quickly spread in the United States. The Young Menâ€™s Christian As-
the result of empirical analyses, and more the product of the two formative â€œtheoretical
sociation (YMCA) was established to create a moral bastion protecting young men from
the temptations of the cities, and even today remains a model for connecting religion and
since the urban theories of Georg Simmel or Louis Wirth, a selective association between
business, since it set up and derived an income from a variety of businesses (such as hotels) (Goh 2011: 56). In contrast, the Salvation Armyâ€™s theology sought to sacralize all as-
the city and modernity; the second maneuver, dubbed â€œdevelopmentalismâ€? by Jennifer
pects of everyday life. In order to conduct missionary work among the non-churchgoing
masses on the city streets and in public spaces, the Salvation Army, with its spectacular
trial countries were considered to be privileged locations of innovation and the â€œcultural
parades and popular music, explicitly competed with the attractions of urban consumer
experiences of modernityâ€? (Robinson 2010: 3). Second, urbanity was, in some way, equa-
culture (Winston 1999).
ted with modernization so that cities â€œelsewhereâ€? in the world, where traditions and the
Nowadays, this practice of sacralizing urban consumer culture has been adopted especial-
allegedly â€œprimitiveâ€? continued to exist, were regarded as â€œun-modern placesâ€? (ibid.), and
ly by Pentecostalism, which is presently growing faster globally than any other religious
thus ultimately non-urban.
movement. Originating in the early twentieth century in Los Angeles, Pentecostalism goes back to a three-year-long prayer marathon known as the Azusa Street Revival, which start-
THE SECULARIST GAZE OF WESTERN URBAN RESEARCH Similarly to urban theory, sociology is also
2008: 38) notes: â€œwe forgot about [religion]. We thoughtâ€”and sociology told usâ€”that sec-
generally founded on the theory of secularization. For example, Stuart Hall (in MacCabe ularization is an unstoppable process. All our notions of modernity and of progress are har-
tecostal churches were already engaging in missionary work in Latin American and African
nessed to secularization, the secular. â€Ś With the defeat of secular alternatives, it became
cities, where Pentecostalism experienced a dramatic growth in the 1980s. Today, to a cer-
the focal point of resistance in some of the less developed parts of the world.â€?
The secularization theory, following Max Weber, assumed that religion in the rational mod-
back into the Global North. From the outset, the Pentecostal faithful and preachers were
ern world epitomized by the large city could only survive in reclusive communities, and
drawn from all ethnicities. In Los Angeles especially, Pentecostalism became a spiritual
that â€œsecularization as the rationalization of the worldâ€? (Gabriel 2008: 10) would spread
home for the black and poorer urban migrants marginalized by the racism of traditional
from Europe across the entire globe. But ever since the establishment of industrial cities
â€œwhiteâ€? churches (Cox 1995: 45ff.).
in the nineteenth century, the prevailing social discourse also regarded the large city as
Karl Marxâ€™s and Friedrich Engelsâ€™ assumption that urbanization would secularize the work-
the antipode of the religious. For conservative and religiously motivated urban critics es-
ing class (see Davis op. cit.) could best be applied to Berlin, which grew dramatically to be-
pecially, industrial cities were amoral sinks of iniquity. Even in Berlin during the Weimar
come the third largest industrial city and, as early as the 1880s, was regarded as the worldâ€™s
Republic, one radical criticism of the large city frequently had recourse to the biblical topos
most a-religious city. In Berlin, even liberal middle-class milieus rejected the Lutheran
of the Whore of Babylon. In the United States, too, the dominant idea was that religion had
Church due to its close ties with the monarchic elites. In working-class quarters, domin-
disappeared from the city, or even that religion as such was alien to the nature of the city.
ated by social democratic and communist beliefs, enmity to the churches was part of every-
For Roberto Orsi (1999b: 42â€“3), this was not only why urban religion has hardly been re-
day political culture (see McLeod 1996). Berlin, then, proves to be a special case of urban
searched, but also why it is regarded as a contradiction in terms.
irreligiosity in the early Western industrial city.
As concerns the (Islamic) city of the caliphs or the sultan as well as the medieval (Chris-
As the above shows, in the course of urban industrialization, rather than religion disappear-
tian) cities in Europe, scholars are agreed that religious rulers â€œwielded policing and ad-
ing from Western industrial cities, it has undergone a transformation process which has
ministrative powers,â€? and the entire â€œidea of citizenship, of civitas, was synonymous with
reacted creatively to new forms of urban life and, in times of radical deep-rooted change,
religious ruleâ€? (AlSayyad and Roy 2006: 4). In contrast, a nexus between the modern
produced innovative religious movements and practices: â€œThe world of the modern city
city and religion has only been granted for special cases such as Jerusalem, already de-
scribed as the urban utopia of â€œheavenly Jerusalemâ€? in the Book of Revelation of St. John
a tribal society propounded by Western orientalists and Turkish modernists, and proving
the Divine and still regarded today as a â€œcity of longingâ€? (Goldhill 2008) by the faithful
of three religions. Beyond this, urban religion was seen as a social reminiscence, a sign
that since the 1980s, partially as the result of a massive rural exodus, the social basis and
of urban backwardness, linked to (poverty) zones in â€œThird World citiesâ€? captive to their
the production of meaning of Islamism had shifted from the rural areas to the informal mi-
traditions, or to migrant milieus not yet fully urbanized. Even here, urban theory over-
grant settlements within large cities (see Schiffauer in this volume). Since then, opposing
looked, for example, the major importance of liberation theology on the intellectual level,
notions of the Islamic city have been competing with one another. In the municipal ad-
as well as for their grassroots congregations, as religious, social, and political actors in
ministrations newly created from the informal gecekondu settlements on the periphery
Latin Americaâ€™s poor urban districts. As a â€œtheology of revolutionary social changeâ€? (Cox
1990: 95), liberation theory, which condemned the â€œmisuse of religion by ruling elites to
initially informed by religiously motivated ideas of a modest urban structure and society
litical post-colonialism. At the same time, under the military regimes, their grassroots
vailing notion of the city as an Islamic â€œexpression of imperial power and splendor,â€? with
congregations offered a safe space for militant resistance movements in cities such as Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, or Santiago de Chile, fostering the poorâ€™s self-organization and â€œliberationâ€? in their struggle for better living conditions and the right to the city.
elements borrowed from the Western-modernist â€œideals of a planned, functional and ef-
ÂżFLHQWFLW\Â´7XJDOLELGVHHFRQWULEXWLRQVE\$\ĂşHdDYGDUDQGg]JH$NWDĂşDQG(GD ĂœnlĂź-YĂźcesoy in this volume).
THE ORIENTALIST IDEA OF THE ISLAMIC CITY If urban theory conceptualized the modern Western
even nowadays, as the â€œdominant frameworkâ€? for studies on contemporary cities in the
city as secular, it regarded the metropolises of the Middle East as precisely the opposite.
Middle East. Finally, in the context of the â€œwar on terror,â€? â€œthe Islamic city model is again
ligion. The Islamic city as a discourse was the invention of French orientalists investigating
and destructionâ€? (ibid.: 271). Hence, for instance, the â€œersatz cities in the American heart-
colonial cities such as Algiers and Damascus in the 1920s. Janet Abu-Lughod (1987) and
landâ€? constructed for exercises in military urban warfare are based on a model of the Islam-
AndrĂŠ Raymond (1994, 2008) show that, in comparison to the European city, the supposed
ic city as â€œchaotic, lawless and underdevelopedâ€? (ibid.: 272).
gious systemâ€™s dominance over the urban as responsible for the continuing decay in these
BLIND SPOTS IN POST-MARXIST URBAN ANALYSES If
cities, their chaotic spatial structure, and their lack of effective institutions. Such sweeping
of the urban, Aihwa Ongâ€™s (2011: 2) argument that both the prevailing social science ap-
one focuses on the religious as an element
descriptions ignore the fact that the cities under Islamic rule have very different forms,
proaches to urban analysis â€œbear a Marxist pedigree and are thus overdetermined in their
span a historical period of over 1,300 years, are found in the geographical space of three
privileging of capitalism as the only mechanism and class struggle as the only resolution to
continents, have a basic urban spatial design that precedes Islam, or that cities such as Cai-
urban problemsâ€? has a particular validity. â€œThe political economy of globalization,â€? one of
ro or Damascus have always been home to considerable religious diversity.
the dominating approaches, postulates global capitalism as the â€œsingular causalityâ€? in the
This clearly indicates how the idea of an Islamic-city model is based on an orientalism
production of the city as a â€œsite of capital accumulation.â€? In turn, urban analyses informed by â€œthe postcolonial focus on the subaltern,â€? the other prevailing approach, limit them-
is one plank in the discourse of the â€œWest and the restâ€? (Hall 1992), which inscribes the
selves to â€œ- agentsâ€? as a â€œspecial category of actors.â€?
qualities of urban, modern, civilized and secular into the concept of the West, and regards
The emphasis on capitalist mechanisms of urbanization and the narrowed focus on
the (Islamic) rest as underdeveloped, traditional and religious: â€œThe disorderly Islamic city was a trope that made possible the norm of the ordered European city. Such a distinction â€Ś
Euro-North American cities, especially evident in critical â€œWestern-centric urban theoryâ€?
resonates with the distinction drawn today between ungovernable Third World cities and
a â€œminimal set of explanatory conditionsâ€? (Ong op. cit.: 6). In doing so, the non-tangible
governed First World citiesâ€? (AlSayyad and Roy 2006: 3). Here, too, Western urban stud-
elements in the production of the urban were ignoredâ€”and this applies especially to
ies reveal, aside from their orientalist perspective, how they exclusively connect religion to
religion. In relation to religion, the bias among (post-)Marxist urban theorists also sup-
backwardness and label it as the antithesis of modern urbanity.
ported a normative secularism (cf. Beaumont and Baker 2011b) through their tendency,
The revitalization of the orientalist notion of the Islamic city from the early 1980s not only
as a rule, to discuss issues in urban diversity and justice without even mentioning as-
illustrates the persistence of colonial concepts, but also their complex patterns of reciprocal
pects of the religious. In general, the politico-economic reductionism in critical urban
appropriation and adaption. During an Islamic renewal, for example, Arab urban planners
studies evident in the analytical subordination of urbanization processes to the logics
and Turkish Islamists sought to re-establish the model of the Islamic city (Abu Lughod
op. cit.)â€”not least with the aim of countering the defamatory image of Islam as a relic of
urban represents in such analyses (cf. McFarlane 2011a: 205; FarĂas 2011: 367). In such
an approach, â€œthe attempt to grapple with notions of urban life itselfâ€? (Simone 2011: 355) falls through the cracks.
as, understood as forms of â€œimmediate communication between atomized individuals,â€? it facilitates â€œpassive networksâ€? (2012: 76). Asef Bayat has coined the term â€œstreet politicsâ€?
On the other hand, â€œsubaltern urbanismâ€? (Roy 2011a) has made important attempts to postcolonize Western-centric urban theory by elaborating independent paths and modernities in post-colonial urban developments as well as subaltern agency. However, in terms of
WRGHVFULEHWKHFRQĂ€LFWVDQGFRQQHFWHGG\QDPLFRISRZHUUHODWLRQVEHWZHHQWKHHQFURDFKing â€œordinary peopleâ€? and the authorities. In this book, we have dedicated a chapter to this
apprehending urban complexities, this approach similarly proves to have its limits due to a perspective that is too narrow. Ananya Roy (ibid.: 235), for example, critically examined
THE GLOBAL PRAYERS RESEARCH PROJECT: THEORETICAL MANEUVERS
â€œontological and topological readings of subalternityâ€? in urban analyses that essentialize the
There are presently extensive ongoing debates over the â€œreturn of the religiousâ€? in a num-
supposedly subaltern identities in the â€œslumâ€? of the â€œmegacityâ€? or celebrate the habitus of
ber of disciplines in the social sciences and humanities. Over the past decade, though with a
the urban poorâ€™s entrepreneurial drive and self-organization (see also Lanz 2008). Aihwa
notable delay, there have also been numerous research studies investigating, on the global
Ong (2011: 9), in turn, points out how these two orientations in post-colonial urban stud-
level, religious practices in cities. However, although the majority of these studies consider
ies, with one underlining the continuities of the colonial past in the urban present and the
religion in the city, they do not consider the city itselfâ€”and this was a key motivation in ini-
other focusing on the political agency of subaltern groups, seem â€œto privilege postcolonial
tiating the Global Prayers project. In general, they focus neither on the question of how the
subjectivity and agency as the primary driving force in vastly different global sites that
urban impacts the formation and character of new forms of religion, nor on how the new
have been greatly transformed, through heterogeneous processes, colonial encounters and
religious communities and practices affect the urban. The studies that exist are also widely
postcolonial histories, in infrastructure, politics, and culture.â€?
dispersed, distributed across a range of area studies, or limited to individual disciplines, in
In contrast to a politico-economic approach, â€œsubaltern urbanismâ€? has paid close attention
particular religious studies and anthropology and their journals. Most previous research has also been directed to individual cities, global regions or religionsâ€”dedicated solely, for
ical Global South. Admittedly, here too, connections between, for example, urban poverty
example, to urban developments in Islam (Desplat and Schulz 2012), the United States
and religious community-formation were privileged over the religious practices of the ur-
(Orsi 1999a) or Asia and Africa (Hancock and Srinivas 2008). As a result, it was hardly in a
ban middle class or transnational connective processes between the city, religion, politics,
position to notice remarkable parallel developments across religions, patterns of urbaniza-
the economy, and culture. Here, Asef Bayat (2007) has provided key theoretical concepts
tion, and world religions. Other research has only focused on particular issues relating to
for investigating religious urbanity. His approach, based on many years of empirical stud-
the presence of the religious in the city (e.g., â€œfaith based organizations,â€? Beaumont 2008,
ies, stands out from reductionist theses Ă la Mike Davis (2004). In particular, he not only
or â€œthe sacredâ€? (GĂłmez and Van Herck 2012).
rejects the standard urban-studies assumption of a causal link between the boom in fun-
In contrast, the theoretical approaches to urban analyses with the largest reach, which over-
damentalist variants of religion and the â€œslumâ€? or urban poverty, but equally disputes the
come some of the blind spots ingrained in urban theory and examine the heterogeneous
supposedly altered ideologies of poverty. Taking Cairo and Tehran as examples, he shows
interconnections between the religious and the urban, subordinate these to homogenizing
that the key Islamic actors come from the educated middle classes, and their missionary
concepts such as the â€œpost-secular cityâ€? (Beaumont and Baker 2011a) or â€œfundamentalist
ambitions lead them to utilize the ignorance of corrupt state apparatuses for the needs
cityâ€? (AlSayyad and Massoumi 2010). The former is particularly problematic in its nor-
of the poor. As Bayat notes, the poor cannot afford to be ideologically choosy, but attach
mative content, â€œlinear temporalityâ€? (Leezenberg 2010), and ethnocentric basis. The lat-
themselves to groups which offer effective support for their everyday needsâ€”spiritual, so-
ter focuses exclusively on the aspects of religious urbanisms which political and academic
cial, and material. Over the past decades, Bayat points out such groups have often been
discourse has most problematized and taken exception to, yet does not address the diverse
radical religious movements.
ordinary forms of urban religiosity. It thus runs the risk of reifying the selective urban the-
Bayatâ€™s notions of the â€œquiet encroachment of the ordinaryâ€? (2000) and â€œstreet politicsâ€?
(1997, 2006) are important in analyzing the religious in urban everyday life. The former
offers a reading of the activism of marginalized groups in cities in post-colonial society as
For this reason, Global Prayers, simultaneously building on and distancing itself from
a non-collective and often illegal agency (e.g., occupying land), which is initially directed
such research, initially adopted a very open heuristic concept to focus on the question of
toward improving the individual personâ€™s own life rather than having any political aim.
the religion of the city. As a result, we are investigating urban religion in its diverse forms
However, Bayat also shows how, in the long term, such a â€œquiet encroachmentâ€? can have
measures threaten what has been achieved (for example, an irregular settlement), en-
and materialities, cultures, politics and economies, forms of living and working, commu-
croachment frequently transforms into a collective political struggle to defend the gains
nity formation, festivals and celebrations, and so onâ€”and together with these, incessantly
made. The location of such struggles is in the physical and social space of the street insofar
generates and (re-)produces the city. Hence, we understand the production of urban reli-
gion and religious urbanity as two sides of a continual process in which the urban and the
each other. In other words, Global Prayers critically explores the theory that religion rep-
cept of fundamentalism reduced to a repressive form of government, AbdouMaliq Simone offers a reading interpreting â€œurban fundamentalism as opening up a space and a time of the miraculous.â€? Fundamentalism understood in this way, which, as it were, resonates with
resents an integral element of material, social, and symbolic production of the urban on
all levels, and thus needs to be integrated in urban theories (see Kong 2001). The Global
which he describes elsewhere, following Ranciere, as â€œthe possibility of those who have â€˜no
Prayers project is designed as transdisciplinary and transinstitutional on the global level,
part in anythingâ€™ to become â€˜anyone at allâ€™â€”that is, to come to the stage, to be visible as
and generates its knowledge by leveraging a diversity of case studies in many different cit-
an ordinary life in the cityâ€? (Simone 2011: 356). The Global Prayers case studiesâ€”which,
ies across the world where these studies have initially been designed as â€œdeep explorative
commonly regarded as fundamentalismâ€”approach these issues from an actor-centered
The conceptual framework we constructed to research into the diverse manifestations of
perspective, thus avoiding a homogenizing explanatory approach within a conceptual re-
religion and religious urbanity in the contemporary city was created on the basis of the the-
Beyond these methodological aspects, worlding is also understood, on the other hand, as
construction of problematic urban-theory traditions as well as the most recent innovations.
heterogeneous spatializing practices, not only collecting the elements and practices com-
Yet in constructing that framework, what theoretical and methodological â€œmaneuversâ€? did
ing from the world into the city, but also releasing them, in an altered form, back into the
world again. In this way, they invoke potential worlds transcending the current conditions
â€œTHE ART OF BEING GLOBALâ€? (AIHWA ONG) Global
of urban living: â€œa non-ideological formulation of worlding as situated everyday practices
the same analytical framework without recourse to reductionist explanatory patterns. In
gence, to the claims that global situations are always in formationâ€? (Ong 2011: 12). World-
her search for â€œanother route through postcolonial urbanismâ€? (Roy 2011b: 307), with the
ing in such a reading is generally viewed as unstable and incomplete. â€œWorlding practices
aim of overcoming the limitations of a subaltern urbanism as described above, Ananja Roy
of centering, of harnessing global regimes of valueâ€? (Roy 2011b: 313) can be regarded as
puts forward a â€œnew way of doing global metropolitan studiesâ€? founded on a shift â€œfrom the
including global modeling and inter-referencing practices (related, for example, to such
postcolonial as an urban condition to the postcolonial as a critical deconstructive method-
spatial variations as gated communities as well as megaprojects, world-class aesthetic dis-
ologyâ€? (ibid.: 308). To avoid the standard approach of linking modernity with the West-
courses, and forms and processes of religious urbanism) just as much as those â€œanticipa-
ern city and facilitate research into metropolitan modernities on the global level, Aihwa
tory politics of residents and transients, citizens and migrantsâ€? (ibid.) which AbdouMaliq
Ong (2011: 9) argues for an analytical framework capable of elaborating â€œhow an urban
Simone (2001), drawing on the example of African cities, has termed â€œworlding from be-
situation can be at once heterogeneously particular and yet irreducibly global,â€? but one
that does not attempt to do so on the basis of a unique explanatory concept. In their book
Worlding Cities, 5R\ DQG 2QJ GHYHORS D VSHFLÂżF LGHD RI ÂłZRUOGLQJÂ´ IRU WKLV SXU-
tution of the zawiya, which has branches in many towns and cities serving both as a lodge and a place of prayer for travelling â€œbrothers,â€? to discuss the translocal networks, economic
pose, which builds on Gayatri Spivakâ€™s original concept. In contrast to Marxist versions of
options, and forms of solidarity which facilitate the extension of urban Africa outside the
worlding, which are subordinated to capitalist logics and, for instance, dominate global city
continent. Frequently a survival strategy, over the last decades this form of worlding has
research, the analytical framework proposed by Roy and Ong breaks with the mainstream
not least been a â€œby-product of the implosion of urban Africaâ€? (Simone 2001: 17).
â€œcore-periphery model of globalizationâ€? (Roy 2009: 824). Worlding alludes, on the one hand, to urban knowledge production itself, and requires
In this sense, Global Prayers explores the manifestations of urban religion and religious urbanity as practices of worlding, whereby here it is especially true that â€œthe art of be-
the deconstruction of global â€œregimes of truthâ€? (Roy 2011b: 314), in particular (though not
ing global ignores conventional borders of class, race, city and country. There are promis-
only) with regard to the production of traditional Western-centric urban theory. One chap-
cuous borrowings, shameless juxtapositions, and strategic enrollments of disparate ideas,
ter of this book takes up precisely this task, offering a â€œdeconstruction of the fundamenWDOLVWFLW\Â´DQGLQWKLVDSSURDFKLQĂ€XHQFHGE\1H]DU$O6D\\DGSRLQWLQJWRRWKHUSRVVLEOH
actors and practices from many sources circulating in the developing world, and beyondâ€? (Ong 2011: 23). In this context, worlding refers, on the one hand, to those aspirations and
readings of the encounter between the city and religious fundamentalism. AlSayyad him-
imaginations informing religiously motivated attempts to create alternative urban worlds
self not only deconstructed the traditional links between fundamentalism and Islamism,
transcending the city as it exists in reality and which, in essence, are common to all ur-
but also the Western-centric theory that can only locate the advance of urban-religious
ban religious practices and communities. On the other hand, worlding also comprises the
fundamentalism, together with its associated â€œmedieval modernity,â€? in the supposedly
(imaginary or real) extension of the particular practices to the translocal and global lev-
un-modern cities outside the West. In this context, in contrast to a religious-urban con-
elsâ€”whether as urban-religious forms of circulation and community building, modeling
practices (for instance, of â€œcities of Godâ€?), borrowing and appropriating (for example, in
be researched as a â€œsensational formâ€? (Meyer 2009, 2012), whose sensory, material, social,
the course of sacralizing urban cultural practices), identities (e.g., as in the form of be-
and symbolic practices not only manifest themselves in the urban, but are also generated
longing to global Ummah or Pentecostalism), or as the expansion of religious-political and
ing visions and voices, practices and orientations, which arise out of the complex desires,
As a rule, the phenomena at the heart of Global Prayersâ€™ research are revealed as glob-
needs and fears of many different people who have come to the cities by choice or com-
al phenomena in the sense that their validity is not conventional, â€œonly intelligible in re-
lation to a common set of meanings, understandings or societal structuresâ€? (Collier and
Ong 2005: 11). According to Stephen Collier and Aihwa Ong, global phenomena are char-
44f). Hence, rather than the cityâ€™s characteristic features only providing the context for re-
ligious experiences and its forms of expression, they belong to the basic constituents from
between the urban and religion investigated hereâ€”by their â€œdistinctive capacity for decon-
which such experiences and forms of expression are generated.
textualisation and recontextualisation, abstractability and movement, across diverse social
The concrete forms of religionâ€™s contextualization and territorialization in the urban en-
and cultural situations and spheres of life. Global forms are able to assimilate themselves
vironment do not occur as a unidirectional incorporation or assimilation, solely either as
to new environments, to code heterogeneous contexts and objectsâ€? (ibid.).
the religious form adapting to the environment or vice versa, but as manifold interactions, references, and intersections, as dynamic processes of appropriation and borrowing. Here,
Prayersâ€™ second theoretical maneuver
counters and interactions between the religious and the urban without subordinating them
Assemblage urbanism enables us to research the cityâ€™s constitution as a multiple, dynam-
ASSEMBLING URBAN-RELIGIOUS CONFIGURATIONS Global
tween religion and urbanity crystalizing from such processes.
to one-dimensional explanatory models.
On the one hand, this maneuver develops from the realization that the secularist and Marx-
of situated and transnational ideas, institutions, actors and practicesâ€? (Ong 2011: 4); in
ist genealogy of urban studies has marginalized â€œattempts to grapple the notions of urban
other words, as a nexus of spaces, objects, bodies, subjectivities, and symbols with diverse
life itselfâ€? (Simone 2011: 355). In particular, in view of the way that approaches in tradi-
and various reciprocal connections and which â€œassemble the city in multiple waysâ€? (FarĂas
tional urban theory fail to grasp the everyday production of the city through the agency of
2010: 14). If one reads assemblage as the constantly emerging â€œproduct of multiple deter-
its residents, including their religious agency, a different method is neededâ€”one that is
minations that are not reducible to a single logicâ€? (Collier and Ong 2005: 12), we can grasp
able to apprehend the â€œdiversity of urbanismsâ€? (McFarlane 2011c: 652), and hence address
the city as a permanently regenerating assemblage of assemblages. Hence, rather than
the urbanâ€™s complexity and multi-dimensionality, its generic and process character, and
analysis focusing on spatial categories or formations, it concentrates on a dense descrip-
the way it is generated from the most diverse connections between extremely heteroge-
tion of the agency apparent in urban everyday life and on the mutually interlacing practices,
neous actors and materials, discourses, aspirations, and imaginations.
processes, and materialities which generate urbanism. In this way, the question (of power)
arises of â€œwho and what has the capacity to assemble the cityâ€? (McFarlane 2011c: 668). In
critiquing very similar limitations in the traditional approaches to religion to those cur-
contrast to the urban political economy, assemblage does not posit power as power over
rently challenged by urban studies. In this respect, they call for comparable changes, em-
but, following Deleuze and Foucault, as power to (Dovey 2011: 349). Rather than resorting
need to postcolonialize religious studies. In this process, the aspects of materiality in reli-
to structural or contextual explanations to read domination, injustices, or exclusions in urban assemblages, they are investigated by concretely considering how asymmetries and
gious practices are considered in a contrasting way to the traditional â€œmentalistic approachâ€?
unequal relations of power develop in their origination processes, and the ruling effects
(Meyer 2012: 14) which, based on a modern dualism between external form and internal
they produce. Hence, analyzing the urban from an assemblage perspective does not mean
disregarding capitalist logics and effects on urban life. Here, too, the principle applies that
terialized the understanding of religion and neglected the â€œreality effectsâ€? (Meyer 2009: 7)
today on the global level â€œurban life cannot be understood external to variegated capital-
of cultural forms. Taking a â€œmaterial approach to religionâ€? (Meyer 2012; cf. VĂĄsquez 2011;
ismsâ€? (McFarlane 2011b: 733). However, these are viewed from a different perspective: â€œBy
Garbin 2012) not only allows religion to be understood as a â€œpractice of mediationâ€? (Meyer
looking at cities, we can learn more about capitalism as a form of life;â€? in other words, cap-
2009: 11) between the idea and experience of supernatural powers and everyday life, but
italism is not understood as an abstract global logic which, as it were, subjugates cities, but
also places the material forms and their affective powers in the focus of research.
investigated â€œas a concrete process assuming multiple formsâ€? (FarĂas 2011: 368).
In relation to the city, religious practice may then be, on the one hand, analyzed as a â€œpre-
The assemblage approach is particularly suited to analyzing the forms of the encounter
scriptive regimeâ€? (Marshall 2009: 11), where technologies of power and technologies of the
between the urban and the religious, understood as a â€œpractice of mediation.â€? On the basis
self intermesh in its practice of governmentality, in Foucaultâ€™s sense. On the other, it can
of Deleuze and Guattariâ€™s concept of agencement, AbdouMaliq Simone (2011: 357) regards
assemblage as pointing to the relation ÂłEHWZHHQWKHSRVVLEOHÂ˛WKHXQVWDEOHĂ€RZVRIPDWH-
rials and substancesâ€”and the prescribedâ€”the imposition of functional stable structures â€Ś
framework of post-colonial inequality of power, the prevailing â€œgeopolitics of knowledgeâ€?
â€”between code and singularity, expression and content.â€? It is especially this underscoring
(Mignolo 2002) mirrored in the â€œdynamics of academic and research policiesâ€? (Kaltmeier
of potentialities, ever-present in the urban, beyond the existent as well as a focus on doing,
2012: 28) in which the research process is embedded.
performing, and events that enables the worlding practices of urban religious communities,
The initial objective was to avoid an analytical Western-centric reductionism informed by
understood just as much as prescriptive regimes as sensational forms, to be grasped as cre-
a ruling discourse where urban modernity per se is fuelled by secularity, and â€œopen up an
ating alternative urban worlds transcending real cities. Such an approach facilitates a con-
ceptual framework capable of doing justice to the diversities and ambiguities in the connec-
tween religious practices and lifestyles and the urban. To achieve this, we adopted, in the
tions between city and religionâ€”its temporalities and instabilitiesâ€”without reducing it to a
broadest sense, an actor-centered and practice-theoretical research approach focusing less
etc.). Hence, interactions between the urban and the religious can be understood as inter-
ing the concrete world of their actors and investigating their â€œway of doing things.â€? Hence,
actions between the components forming the assemblage; as Colin McFarlane (2011c: 653)
this is about reconstructing â€œthe interior perspectives of the actors and the experiences un-
notes in quoting Gilles Deleuze, their sole unity is that of â€œco-functioning: it is a symbiosis,
a â€˜sympathy.â€™â€? In this way, it becomes possible to focus on the multiple interlacing of the
To this end, we carried out the following operations: expanding the concept of research to
religious even with all those aspects of urban spaceâ€”the sensory, imaginary, material, etc.â€”
which would remain beyond the reach of standard urban theory. Thus, in the words of Ash
primarily engaging local Fellows to conduct on-site research; and a collaborative progres-
Amin and Nigel Thrift (2002), this approach can then â€œrepopulate the cityâ€? (ibid.:4), which
sive knowledge production, partially developed in cooperation in intensive workshops and
on research trips, and partially in discussions with university and civil society communica-
(ibid.: 84), with those urbanâ€”here religiousâ€”actors and aspects having previously fallen
tion partners in the cities in the research project.
through the cracks in models of urban theory.
In this spirit, Global Prayers analyses the diverse and various encounters and links be-
historically colonized by academia, and included artistic forms of research. We decided that neither the scholar nor the artist should have the sole authority over knowledge-formation
tions,â€? which we understand as assemblages of material, social, symbolic, and sensuous
or the diverse forms of presentation for Global Prayers â€“ from the various text formats to
spaces, processes, practices, and experiences where the religious and the urban are inter-
exhibitions, performative events, and installations (see Kathrin Wildner in this volume).
The projectâ€™s transdisciplinary approach transcending the borders of academia and art was
EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON AS A RESEARCH STRATEGY Global Prayersâ€™ third theoretical maneu-
stead, the artistic approaches were to be regarded as an independent â€œepistemic practiceâ€?
ver relates to the projectâ€™s concrete research strategies. This also addresses the issue of
(Bippus 2009), hence expanding the concept of research. As noted by Anne Huffschmid
ed â€œas a procedure of validation of a hypothesis,â€? but as a â€œprocedure of exploration and
search project initially started from more contingent observations, which later became
discoveries, a constant and delicate movement between knowing and not-knowing.â€? This
in the Global Prayers publication Faith is the Place (2012: 165â€“6), research is not regard-
increasingly systematic and collaborative, on the multiple transformation processes and
the growing presence of urban manifestations of the religious which evidently crossed the
of the â€œaesthetical interrogation of reality.â€? In the context of the researchersâ€™ subjectivity,
classic borders between, for example, South and North, or overstepped traditional reli-
the former questions how they construct their analytical perspective; the latter contains a
gious territorialization and cultural embeddedness. This contradicted basic urban theo-
ry assumptions which we also subscribed to, or was either simply overlooked by urban
formativity of religious urbanities, or political stagings, including a critical consciousness
studies or discussed with a one-dimensional explanatory logic. Given this major gap between everyday urban life and urban knowledge production, there was an obvious need
of visual discoursesâ€? (ibid.: 166).
to critically review accepted urban studies methods and theoretical approaches from the
tualizationâ€”since this could only have followed accepted theoriesâ€”and design a research
JURXQG XS +HUH LW ZDV LPSRUWDQW WR LQLWLDOO\ PDQDJH ZLWKRXW DQ\ GHÂżQLWLRQDO FRQFHS-
approach as open and experimental as possible, informed by decentering, defamilializing
prone crisis management and, in the process, generated a new diversity of perspectives
and â€œun-truthingâ€? (Jane Jacobs 2012). Such research is based on an interrogative, induc-
on research topics, issues, and methods. The project Global Prayers was developed by
PHWUR=RQHVDQDVVRFLDWLRQRIVFKRODUVDUWLVWVMRXUQDOLVWVDQGFXUDWRUVZKRKDYHEHHQ investigating urbanization processes on the global level for some years. The project is im-
ging demands and studies calling for a renewal of comparative urban research, and applying such methods. This is particularly relevant since the projects suggested, including those
by Jennifer Robinson (2006, 2010), belong to the efforts to postcolonialize urban studies
ies faculty as well as the Haus der Kulturen der Welt, a forum not only for contemporary
by analyzing â€œordinary citiesâ€? on the global level within shared conceptual frameworks. At
art but also for theoretical and socially relevant discussions on the global circulation of
present, a number of highly different concepts are collected under the umbrella of compar-
cultures. Research cooperations were also realized with the Berlin arts association Neue
ative research approaches, though there is no space here to systematically discuss the spec-
Gesellschaft fĂźr Bildende KĂźnste (New Society for Visual Arts), which is located in a po-
trum they cover (see for example: Robinson 2010, Ward 2010, McFarlane 2010 or Urban
Geography issues 28, no. 1 (2007), 29, no. 5 (2008) and 33, no. 6 (2012)).
eral left-leaning Heinrich BĂśll-Stiftung (in Beirut, Istanbul, Mexico, Buenos Aires, Rio de
Janeiro, and Lagos) which, in its local-level civil society cooperation, has often been con-
â€œthe systematic study of similarity and difference among cities or urban processes,â€? Glob-
fronted with the set of problems relating to urban religion and is interested in developing
al Prayers does not follow a classical comparative approach. Working with the idea of a
approaches to it.
â€œcomparative consciousnessâ€? (Nader 1994), the project focuses less on similarities and differences between mutually exclusive units (in particular since, in our view, cities cannot
process also sought to avoid reproducing the prevailing geopolitics of knowledge by un-
be understood as such units) than on transformations and connections, or the melding of
national journals, connections to elite universities, etc.). Instead, we welcomed local ap-
terest. Here, â€œtransnational examinationsâ€? are a key strategy since these â€œcan use one site
plicantsâ€™ well-founded and specialized knowledge acquired on the ground in the research
to pose questions on anotherâ€? (Roy 2003: 466). The individual case studies do not follow
cities or deriving from sources beyond academic logics. In the course of the project, the
resulting composition of actors not only facilitated a multi-faceted readiness to experiment
tions as practices of worlding, they always point to global forms and processes, and mate-
with methods and forms of collaboration, but also generated numerous problems and con-
Ă€LFWV5DWKHUWKDQWKHVHGHULYLQJVROHO\IURPWKHÂżHOGRIWHQVLRQEHWZHHQWKHSURMHFWÂśVH[perimental constellation and the particular logic of and demands in the German research
rial as well as imaginary transnational networks and connections. In a certain sense, the researchers often only needed to follow the urban-religious actors they were investigating
and funding landscape in which the project is embedded, they were also due to the struc-
tural inequalities between the various project actors in terms of access to resources, links to
ishâ€? and â€œdevoutâ€? urban locations and cultural practices, between cities that really exist and
academia, or the implementation of standardized demands on international research and
imaginary â€œcities of God,â€? etc.
In a certain sense, Global PrayersLVDÂŤSURMHFWDVGHÂżQHGE\-DQH-DFREV
A modus operandi was then established through four long workshops in Berlin, Lagos, Bei-
(2012), drawing on Gilles Deleuze as a â€œphilosopher of this kind of (+).â€? Hence, this is not
about establishing essential differences between â€œAâ€? and â€œBâ€? or explaining everything by
public events. After the initial explorative phase, the way of working became increasingly
a single logic, a â€œhomogenizing geography of a single causeâ€?: â€œRather, the Deleuzian (+)
consolidated, with growing reciprocal understanding between researchers and collabora-
points to multiplicity, and in the direction of emergence and becomingâ€? (ibid.: 905). This
tion in a variety of local as well as translocal constellations, which gradually led to the de-
follows the simple insight that â€œthe project of decentering assumes multiples,â€? as is evident
velopment of more robust conceptual frameworks and terms. This step-by-step process
in â€œthe notion of the center against which one worksâ€? (ibid.: 904). In this sense, Global
did not only generate a conceptual framework for the entire project, but also produced
close cooperation between, for example scholars and artists in Beirut, Istanbul, and Mum-
SchĂ¤fer et al. 2006; Lanz et al. 2008) whereby, to quote Jane Jacobs, â€œthe multiple (1 + 1)
bai. Moreover, the reciprocal approach to critiquing methods and content also increasingly
generates an ever-present ground â€˜un-truthingâ€™ in which I am forced to admit that what is
happening in City A does not, might not, cannot stand for City B, and certainly not for City
Godâ€? in Lagos and Istanbul; between the politico-religious urban constellations in Jakarta,
E(verywhere)â€? (op. cit. 907).
Mumbai, and Beirut; between the urban-religious forms of de- and re-territorialization in
The individual Global Prayers productions created from such an approach are mutually re-
Kinshasa, London, Rio de Janeiro, and Berlin; between the historical foundations of the
religious movements in Tehran, Mexico, and Buenos Aires; and between forms of sacraliza-
a multi-faceted picture of present urban transformations in the context of urban religions
tion of urban cultural practices in Rio de Janeiro, Istanbul, and Amsterdam.
and religious urbanities. Rather than, as in a narrower sense, comparatively tracing the de-
This leads me back to the initial question in this section on the comparative nature of Glob-
al Prayers. This question has to be discussed, not least, in the context of the recent emer-
ed, within the framework of productions, connections, fractures, similarities, or differences
between the elements regarded as dynamic and temporary, to stand for itself. Knowledge of
cities, religious actors, and transregional connections was not arbitrary, it was naturally selective. Thus, though Global Prayers are not generally limited to religious movements within
here, and discussed in the present book or, in some cases, in the preceding volume Faith is the PlacePHWUR=RQHV 7KHDLPLVWRVNHWFKDSLFWXUHQRPDWWHUKRZIUDJPHQWDU\DO-
Christianity and Islam, the studies in this book, with the exception of one study on Hinduism, all focus on such religious movements. In essence, their shared novelty lies in the fact that,
URBAN CULTURES OF CONVERSION
as global forms, they have grown to become mass movements in the most diverse metrop-
culture, and space, Global PrayersUHVHDUFKLQGLFDWHVKRZWRDVLJQLÂżFDQWGHJUHHQHZUH-
To begin initially with the relationship between religion,
olises around the world, or are totally new movements, and interact intensely with urban
ligious communities distancing themselves from traditional orthodoxies interact with the
structures and lifeworlds (in contrast see the previous publication Faith is the Place, which
urban in the process of their particular religion breaking away from its traditional embed-
conducted both in â€œparticular cities,â€? for example, cities regarded as capitals of Pentecostal-
ry of religionâ€™s global individualization, â€œde-territorialization and de-culturation.â€? In this
0XPEDL EXWDOVRLQÂłRUGLQDU\FLWLHVÂ´ZLWKRXWDQ\DSSDUHQWVSHFLÂżFFKDUDFWHULVWLFVLQWHUPV of urban-religious dynamics (such as Berlin, Jakarta, Mexico, Amsterdam, or Atlanta). This
YROXPHIRUH[DPSOH$PDQGD'LDVÂśVUHVHDUFKLQWRWKH6DODÂżVWFRPPXQLW\VKRZVKRZD religious movement without traditional cultural and territorial connections created itself in the Christian city of Rio de Janeiro. Its growth was derived from individual conversions, which can be read just as much as an aspect of a dynamic religious market as the result of
5LRGH-DQHLURÂśVVSHFLÂżFVRFLDODQGUHOLJLRXVODQGVFDSH7KHWUDQVIRUPDWLRQRI6KLLWH,VODP in Beirut with its invention of religious ritual, discussed by Joseph Rustom, also follows
a deterritorialization due to Shiite migration from rural Southern Lebanon into a Sunni
In the context of the operations mentioned above, the 1 + 1 + 1 + project concept does not
Muslim Beirut. The Chhath festival in Mumbai can be similarly located, transforming from
only relate to questions of content, but also to the methodological and strategic positioning
a traditional religious ritual into a mega-event in the course of urban migration by the rural
of Global Prayers. In this sense, the project follows Colin McFarlaneâ€™s (2010: 727) notion
population in northern Indian and their subsequent stigmatization (cf. George Jose).
of comparison as a strategy: â€œIn the expansive reading of comparison â€Ś I argue for atten-
â€œThe return of religion into public space,â€? according to Roy, â€œno longer occurs as something
tion not just to different scholarly knowledges on cities from social science across the world,
culturally taken for granted, but as a display of â€˜pureâ€™ religiosity or reconstructed tradi-
but different activist and public knowledges that are important for the production of a
tionsâ€? (ibid.: 24).To avoid isolation in religious â€œghettos,â€? religious communities look for
more global, more democratic urban studies characterized by diverse urban epistemes and
new â€œcultural markersâ€? (ibid.: 255). In this process, it is no coincidence that new religious
imaginaries.â€? Understood in this way, comparison becomes a â€œmode of thoughtâ€? beyond
communities turn to urban youth and pop culture, since this cultureâ€™s (young) protagonists
WKHPHWKRGRORJLFDOLVVXHVRIDFRPSDUDWLYHZRUNDQGDVWUDWHJLFWRROLQWKHRYHUDOOFRQÂżJuration of a project seeking to cross transdisciplinary, transinstitutional and transregional boundaries; in other words, it becomes a tool â€œfor creating new conversations and collab-
are a popular target for their missionary strategies. As the Global Prayers case studies
LQGLFDWHWKHFLWLHVHVSHFLDOO\DUHWKHORFDWLRQVZKHUHUHOLJLRXVDFWRUVÂżQGDQHZFXOWXUDO political, and economic embeddedness. To begin with, in a kind of anti-cyclical movement,
critique and inquiryâ€? (ibid.: 730). Last but not least, following AbdouMaliq Simone (2010 :
progressive hybridization, de-bordering, individualization, and secularization of urban re-
263), the aim is to go beyond a purely analytic approach â€œto imagine a situation whereâ€? At-
ligions. This dialectic entanglement of the religious with the urban generates a diversity of
lanta, Beirut, Berlin, Istanbul, Jakarta, Cairo, Kinshasa, Lagos, Mexico, Mumbai, Rio de Ja-
urban cultures of conversion. For example, (post-)Islamist middle-class milieus in Istanbul
neiro, and Tehran â€œare â€˜neighborsâ€™ in a single metropolitan space and what that experience
infuse urban consumer cultures linked to the fashion and beauty industry with a religious
might be like for people who would live within it.â€? Such a comparison is not only endowed
VLJQLÂżFDQFHg]JH$NWDĂşDQG(GDhQOÂ <Â FHVR\+LGD\HW7XNVDO %XLOGLQJVFRPSOH[HVLQ
with meaning as reciprocal Learning from*WKHWLWOHRIDQHDUOLHUPHWUR=RQHVH[KLELWLRQ
the wastelands of urban modernityâ€”whether those generated by industrial production and
see Becker et. al. 2003) but is equally â€œa key site for the urban imaginationâ€”a potential site
its bureaucracies or by the cultural industriesâ€”are similarly transformed into serial rooms
of politicsâ€? (McFarlane 2010: 732).
for Pentecostal prayer, appearing in the photo series by Sabine Bitter and Helmut Weber as a global form going beyond regional patterns. Or religious actors adopt previously demonized practices and genres from both worldly and global urban pop- and subcultures, â€œpurifyâ€? them
INTERCONNECTIONS: COMBINING ANALYTICAL â€œDEEP EXPLORATIVE DRILLINGâ€? TO FORM A COHERENT PICTURE
to conform with their religious values, and market them in a highly lucrative global religious
In this last section, I would like to suggest, on the basis of the higher-level issues, a variety of
media and culture industry (Martijn Oosterbaan; AdĂŠ Bantu; and Johannes Ismaiel-Wendt).
interconnections between case studies and Global Prayers productions, taken as exemplary
originally urban processes of mutual borrowings, appropriation, transformation, and ne-
Istanbul, and Berlin, and ultimately to Paris. As Heck illustrates with the example of Istanbul,
tion. In a continual process of dialectic entanglements, they shift existing urban borders
paradigmatically in a â€œworlding from belowâ€? (Simone 2001), to enable urban Africa to expand
JRWLDWLRQ DV ZHOO DV WKRVH RI VHJUHJDWLRQ GHPDUFDWLRQ SXULÂżFDWLRQ DQG KRPRJHQL]D-
between sacral and secular cultural practices, even though these rigid divisions were, in
around the globe. The churches function as places of retreat, offer migrants economic and po-
general, initially constructed by the religious communities themselves to keep the faith-
litical options, serve as the location, in their role as a spiritual home, of a religious community
ful from the temptations of the sinful world.
and experience, and provide a â€œdistinction marker to assert their believers as having a moral concept and lived identityâ€? (Gerda Heck).
RELIGIOUS METROPOLITAN MAINSTREAM
Where urban religions interact with current cultur-
al and political practices and scenes in urban space, they create new kinds of cultural self-evidences facilitating their compatibility with the most modern forms of urbanity. Even in Berlin, the dynamic of religion is no longer limited to disputes between migrant religions
These examples show that, contrary to the traditional urban theory assumptions, in the conWH[WRIVXFKXUEDQUHOLJLRXVFRQÂżJXUDWLRQVDVSUDFWLFHVRIZRUOGLQJUHOLJLRQGRHVQRWUHSUHsent some exotic reminiscence, but its agency unfolds at the heart of metropolitan moderniza-
in the diaspora, as still shimmers through in Werner Schiffauerâ€™s essay. The artistic research
of a global â€œnew metropolitan mainstream,â€? which the research network INURA (2011) un-
for Global Prayers by Magdalena Kallenberger and Dorothea Nold (2012), in contrast, in-
derstands as structurally comparable urban development strategies and lifestyles applicable
vestigated the spatial practices of new Christian congregations in Berlin who rent such sub-
â€œunder the conditions of planetary urbanizationâ€? in economically competing cities. Instead, in
culture venues for their church services as a trendy nightclub, an arthouse movie theater, or
a co-working space. Here, it becomes clear how the urban dynamic of religion has already reached the â€œcreative classes,â€? the educated, individualist, and entrepreneurial milieu which
URBAN-RELIGIOUS BODILY PRACTICES AS THE (SELF-)GOVERNANCE OF BELIEVERS
represents that metropolitanism in Berlin currently celebrated around the world. The pro-
section discusses interconnections between Global Prayersâ€™ research into the relationship
fane locations these congregations appropriate are less sacralized by staged interventions
between religious communities and their believers and non-believing urban residents, as evi-
than atmospherically by a mediating â€œspiritâ€? of religious â€œcommunitasâ€? spread through the
dent in their interactions with the city. This is closely linked to the question of the religious
actorsâ€™ â€œembodied acts and the bodily practicesâ€? (Holloway and Valins 2002: 8) in urban
this way, such new religious communities forge links to other metropolitan community for-
space. Since this in essence addresses the question of governmentality in Foucaultâ€™s sense,
mations that are presently highly dynamic and which, as in the case of co-working and club
drawing on this concept allows various studies to be read together. As a â€œtotality of proce-
communities, have emerged from urban subcultures.
dures, techniques, methods that constitute the way people rule one anotherâ€? (Foucault 2005:
116), governance does not only suppress subjectivity, but also promotes technologies of the
on urban planning projects, lifestyles, infrastructures and power structures in the religious
self, which can be docked onto the aims of governmentality. Hence, governmentality is, in
general, not characterized â€œby the power to rule,â€? but â€œby the power to affect, like the relation-
a global scale, these complexes also belong to the most modern representations of late
ship between priest and congregation, producing a certain set of behaviors within members
capitalist urbanityâ€”though here, as megaprojects developed through centralist planning
Religious communities, then, can be understood as programs of conversion and redemp-
technocratic, and modernist. Although the Istanbul development was designed by a
tion and as technologies of governance to collectively implement the rules and anchor them
state apparatus dominated by the Islamic faith and the Lagos complex is the product of
in the individuals (cf. Marshall 2009). In doing so they offer religious rituals through which
an economic-religious (global) company, both constellations ultimately appear as urban-
At the same time they provide a precise code of conduct, with which the believers are to
also locations where processes of secularization (of Christian as well as Islamic milieus
govern their own life on an everyday basis, and give clear instructions concerning fami-
and their values) and sacralization (of urban social space) are active, creating paradoxical
ly life, gender roles, sexual orientation, consumer behavior, and cultural activities (Lanz
effects. In these two religious worlding processes, it is precisely the gated community, the
2012). In this interconnected governing of the self and the other, the believers go through
global paradigm of space in the Western secular city under neoliberal capitalism, which
a process of subjectivization creating them as new people, and intending to lift them out
becomes an exemplary model for the development of a real â€œcity of Godâ€? which follows the
of an urban environment perceived as not-pleasing to God or, literally as devilish, into a divinely ordered spaceâ€”a â€œcity of God,â€? as it were. In this process, space is also to be under-
In her multi-sited ethnography, Gerda Heck describes quite different types of urban worlding
stood in Lefebvreâ€™s sense as geographical.
practices which, however, are equally avant-garde. Her research traces the global migration
Each individual conversion in the context of the individualized and deculturized forms of
routes of Congolese revivalist Christians from Kinshasa to the transfer cities of Rio de Janeiro,
urban religion turns into, first and foremost, a question of the governance of the self,
as is evident, for instance, in the studies, both conducted in Rio de Janeiro, by Amanda
H[DPSOHPHWUR=RQHV VXFKVWXGLHVDOVRFRQÂżUP$VHI%D\DWÂśV VWDWHPHQWWKDW marginalized urban residents cannot afford to be ideological. Instead, they are more likely
event of conversion represents a break with a previous lifestyle and an extreme endeavor
to side with those groups able to effectively support them in their everyday needs and, over
on womenâ€™s religious lifestyles in Istanbul shows, this generally leads to a permanent strug-
elaborated historically in an interaction with the technologies of power they were exposed
WRFUHDWHDQHZSHUVRQDOLGHQWLW\$VWKHFRQWULEXWLRQE\g]JH$NWDĂşDQG(GDhQOÂ <Â FHVR\
the last decades, these were often religious organizations. Their technologies of the self,
gle in self-disciplining which interacts with its urban environment. The strategic program
to, enable the urban poor to act as subjects, and certainly make them capable of, depending
of each particular religious community is inscribed in the new believers during the pro-
on theirâ€”material, political, or spiritualâ€”objectives and needs, interlinking the religious,
cess of subjectivization, which is largely realized through bodily practices enacted in urban space as a break with the spatial practices exercised before the conversionâ€”as, for instance,
â€œThe corporeal enactment and performances â€Ś [which] are central to the maintenance and
in Amanda Diasâ€™s example of the use of the beach in Rio de Janeiro. This is also realized
development of religious spaces and landscapesâ€? (Holloway and Valins 2002: 8) are natu-
through religious clothing, especially in terms of womenâ€™s bodies (though, as Dias indicates,
rally not only expressed in individual body practices, but also appear in performances, such
not exclusively so). Taking the example of academic religious women in Istanbul, Hidayet
as collective prayers, missionary â€œcrusades,â€? processions, or purely symbolic occupations
Tuksal describes how since, in contrast to men, their clothing makes them visibly religious
of space, which religious communities orchestrate in the form of a technology of power in
combining their faith and everyday life. Asonzeh Ukahâ€™s description of the virtually totali-
invisibility play an important role here as when, for instance, Hezbollah, in Beirut, osten-
urban space. As the artistic contribution by Paola Yacoub shows, questions of visibility and
tarian code of conduct for all the residents of Redemption City in Lagos highlights in par-
sively enacted the power of God and his representatives on earth during an overpoweringly
ticular just how strongly the religious regulation of bodily practices extends into all areas of
and passionately staged funeral procession. This, in turn, is complemented by a process of
everyday culture (alcohol, smoking, bars, dancing, music, sex, etc.).
making those elements invisible which contradict its claims to religious-political purity and
The collective self-organization of created or transformed assemblages of religious perfor-
perfection. In Yacoubâ€™s words â€œBoth ostentation and occultation contribute simultaneously
mance in urban space, however, reveals how unstable, dynamic, and contingent the development of religious body practices are in the city. This includes such hybrids as the Pentecostal â€œcrusade,â€? carnival, or the drug-gang funk party in Rio de Janeiro (Martijn Oosterbaan), ritual prayers in the Santa Muerte cult in Mexico (Anne Huffschmid), the
to how religious leaders have a major responsibility for dead bodies.â€?
%ULDQ/DUNLQÂśVDUWLFOHLQWXUQWDNHVWKHGLIIHUHQWH[DPSOHRIDQXUEDQUHOLJLRXVFRQÂżJXration in the northern Nigerian city of Jos, which has repeatedly suffered from religious
FRQĂ€LFWV WR H[SORUH WKH LQWHUZRYHQQHVV RI WHFKQRORJLHV RI VHOI DQG SRZHU /DUNLQ LOOXV-
burial rituals in Kinshasa taken over by adolescents (Filip De Boeck), or young people in
Mumbai transforming the Ganesh Chuturthi festival into techno-style rave parties (George
churches and mosques, are capable, as non-human actors in Latourâ€™s sense, of drawing
Jose). Potentialities appear in such urban-religious configurations for quite different
attention to religious messages and creating emotions capable of fomenting religious con-
(social, cultural, spiritual) urban worlds than those envisaged in religious governance
programs. They show particularly clearly how, in their mutual interactions with the believersâ€™
with a deliberate strategy of disattention. Through this opposing technology of the self,
WHFKQRORJLHV RI WKH VHOI DQG WKH VSHFLÂżF HIIHFWLYH SRZHUV RI WKH XUEDQ JRYHUQDQFH SURgrams inevitably fail as an entirety (as do all such programs), and the relationship between
they seek to distract themselves from an urban space which, through sound, has been exSORVLYHO\FKDUJHGZLWKUHOLJLRXVFRQĂ€LFWDQGZKLFKWKH\FDQQRWSK\VLFDOO\HVFDSH
governing the self and the other has to be constantly realigned. At the same time, in their
(STREET) POLITICS RECLAIMING THE (RELIGIOUS) RIGHT TO THE CITY
society. For example, Pentecostalismâ€™s de facto patterns of government in Rio de Janeiroâ€™s
Prayers contributions just mentioned, I would like to now take the case studies as a start-
ing point to consider connections to the relations between the political and the religious
torically developed character as a particular urban space. The favelaâ€™s self-made urbanism
Following the two Global
LQ WKH FLW\ 7KLV DSSOLHV ÂżUVW RI DOO WR WKHRULHV VXFK DV WKDW SXW IRUZDUG E\ 0LNH 'DYLV
mality in the sense of self-organized regulations and precarity, as well as an individual and
collective creativity as the â€œquiet encroachment of the ordinaryâ€? (Bayat 2004; Lanz 2012).
by the latter. Similarly, Nezar AlSayyad (2010) primarily associates radical-religious urban
This also highlights how the connection between poverty and the rise of urban religions,
groups with reactionary positions, connecting their rise to the possible establishment of
dubbed by Asef Bayat (2007) in the context of Islam as the â€œmyth of the Islamic poor,â€? is
a â€œfundamentalist city,â€? â€œwhere certain categories of people or the religious other are ren-
far from being as causal and one-dimensional as urban theory has so often assumed (cf.
Davis 2004). Although Global Prayersâ€™ studies indicate that the urban poor often regard
ical religious groups could constitute as powerful actors, AlSayyad and Massoumi (2010)
religion as a means of enhancing their control over their own circumstances (see, for
point to a multiplicity of mutually interwoven processes, as do a number of the authors of
research projects conducted for Global Prayers (for example, Danusiri, Jose, Bou Akar,
munity (on this notion see, for example, Marcuse 2009, Harvey 2008). Their success was
Rustom, Yacoub, SchĂ¤fer, and Huffschmid). These processes include power and exploit-
based on a political activism addressing those social issues that were existentially import-
ative structures from colonialism, ethno-nationalist projects, institutionalized forms of
ant for the Shiites migrating from rural southern Lebanon to Beirut. This urban-religious
marginalization, the arrogance of secular or traditional religious elites, and modernizing
processes that break up social structures. AlSayyad and Massoumi rightly note that radical
community formation with an associated political practice and, interacting with this, the
political-religious groups can successfully establish themselves in cities by reacting to such
material, social, and symbolic production of urban space, and it resulted not least in the
societal constellations with transcendentally based practices capable of endowing meaning,
creation of completely new types of religious spaces and rituals.
Justin Beaumont and Christopher Bakerâ€™s (2011a, 2011b) concept of the postsecular city
offers a quite different interwovenness in contemporary cities in contrast to the repressive
gion and politics intersect on the urban level. Danusiriâ€™s research clearly shows how urban
religious-political forms of interactions described above. However, the one-sided empha-
sis on the positive effects of the religious urban presence makes this ultimately normative
ment processes detrimental to their interests, and in this process invent new saints and
concept, which interprets the city transformed by postsecularism as a laboratory of educational and ethical change, appear to be almost naively optimistic. Certainly, the asser-
rituals (such as the aspired sacralizing of space, veneration of saints, or hope of a miracle)
tion that integrating religious groups in urban governance does not automatically lead to
conservative political change, but also facilitates the formation of overarching coalitions of
tives of secular actors in a spatial practice, forcing urban development processes to become
the subject of a public negotiation.
Prayers project (e.g., Schiffauer in this volume; Teschner 2011). Nonetheless, the Global
George Joseâ€™s research in Mumbai also considered the new way in which political and reli-
Prayers research into the urban-religious way of doing things through actor-centered ap-
gious claims and practices in urban space are interwoven, in this case in the transforma-
tion of the Hindu Chhath festival from a ritual celebrated privately into a mega-event on
than these two opposing concepts of, on the one hand, a fundamentalist city viewed as re-
the glamorous Juhu Beach, resembling a scene from a Bollywood movie. Through this
pressive and marginalizing and, on the other, a postsecular city interpreted as a laboratory
religious-political event, representatives of the marginalized Bhojpuri migrants confront
of ethical change.
ideological opponents such as the Hindu nationalist Shiv Sena. This transformation of
Such ambivalent interlacings are already evident in the two religious-political movements
a religious ritual into an event reinvents religious tradition and fuses it with a political mobilization which asserts and defends the right to the city for the individual ethnic
modern urban interlinking between the religious and the political in the 1970s. These two
movements were political Islam which, as Hengameh Golestan and Sandra SchĂ¤fer note,
Paradigmatically, these Global Players studies show the lack of evidence to support ei-
emerged as the ruling form in the wake of the Iranian Revolution, and a Catholic liberation
ther the view that religious (fundamentalist) movements are simply replacing secular
(emancipatory) ones, or that the formerâ€™s political involvement can be reduced to reac-
a multiplicity of grassroots communities in poor districts across Latin America (cf. Anne
tionary (religious) positions or to a positive ethical change in the cities. Instead, one can
Huffschmid in this volume). Though these movements have fundamental differences as,
identify, often in the sense of Asef Bayatâ€™s â€œstreet politics,â€? multi-faceted intersecting
for instance, in their political and ideological proximity to the poor which was more instru-
forms of politics and religion in all nuances of ideology and agency. At times, religious
mental in political Islam and, rather, an end in itself in liberation theology (Bayat 2007),
and political mobilization fuse, while in other cases religion is instrumentalized as a ve-
they also share important features, for example, in terms of their anti-colonial stance or
hicle for political protest, and vice versa. Such an instrumentalization may also occur to
push through the classical demands of emancipatory movements, such as social rights.
If one examines interwovenness between the political forms of religion in urban daily life
When discriminated migrant workers self-organize (in this case, the Bhojpuri in Mumbai
less on the basis of strategic programs and technologies of power and more through the everyday forms and the concrete spatial and cultural practices by which they become man-
or Shiites in Beirut), there is a successive sacralization of areas of political struggle or so-
ifest in the city, the result is a picture of ambivalences and contradictionsâ€”as is evident
from the three following examples. For instance, Joseph Rustomâ€™s research looked at three
sacral are renegotiated, creating novel hybrid structures. As Roberto Orsi (1999b: 53) right-
Sheikh generations to explore the rise of the Shiites in Beirut from a marginalized minority to a powerful religious-political group utilizing Beirutâ€™s particular political and social char-
ly notes: â€œThere is nothing necessarily liberating about the alternative worlds constituted
RUGLVFORVHGE\WKHVHXUEDQUHOLJLRXVPDSVÂŤ$OOUHOLJLRXVUHFRQÂżJXUDWLRQVRIXUEDQVSDFH make some experiences possible, encourage and satisfy some desires and aspirations, while 41
disallowing others.â€? Hence, interactions between the political sphere and the new urban
gious.â€? Werner Schiffauerâ€™s research into multi-religious encounters and forms of involve-
religions always contain at least the potential of opening the city, as AbdouMaliq Simone
ment in local politics, shows, not least, that such a selectively understood secularity is also
expressed it, for the miraculous which can enable new urban worlds to appear beyond the
no longer viable. Such traditional borders are destabilized in the rearguard actions of â€œmil-
real urban landscape.
As the Global Prayers research shows, there presently appears to be in the cities, on the NEW ZONES OF SECULAR-SACRAL OVERLAPPING IN URBAN SPACE
It remains to note, in conclu-
most diverse levels, a complete and continuous renegotiation of traditional bordersâ€”even
sion, that the Global Prayers research generally indicates the impossibility of limiting the
if â€œonlyâ€? discursively establishedâ€”between the secular and sacral, religion, politics, the
urban religious dynamic anywhere in the world to just the poor populations, or to migrant
economy, and culture, and all their manifestations and forms of materialization in urban
religions in the diaspora with their niches and battles over diverging assertions. Instead,
space. As a result of ongoing social practices and negotiation processes, these borders are
this religious dynamic can be found on all levels of the permanent production of the urban,
shifting, producing novel hybrid structures, new fragmented and fractal borders, and inno-
and thus needs to be correspondingly integrated into urban theory. All the urban-religious
ping and interwovenness between religious forms of producing urban spaces, forms of the
least this should be the aim of urban theory, as closely as possible in all their complexity.
WKHLU SUDFWLFHV RI ZRUOGLQJ DQG VKRXOG EH UHĂ€HFWHG LQ XUEDQ NQRZOHGJH SURGXFWLRQÂ˛DW
religious transformation of everyday urban life, the location of transregional religious connections and the governmentality of urban religious communities, which all emerge from
TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN BY ANDREW BOREHAM
urban-religious practices of worlding. As has become clear, the religious expands into all other (supposedly secular) areas in the permanent production of the urban in such a way
21). Such a view is also supported by Adrian Ivakhiv (2006: 173), who regards religion as
ographies. At the same time, though, the urban practices of religious actors cannot be reduced to political claims or economic or social activities, even if they intimately connect â€œreligionâ€? to such claims or activities (on this point, see Schiffauer). Despite saints being invented during the political struggle over an urban development project (in Jakarta, see Danusiri), or church communities representing centers of economic enterprises (in Istanbul, see Heck), or Redemption City representing a capitalist form of urban planning (in Lagos, see Ukah), these
life and spiritual experience. In many cases, such practices temporarily or permanently transform spatial structures into sacred places: miracles are attributed to new â€œSaintsâ€? and new pilgrimage sites established; religious services and forms of community in the diaspora are experienced as religious communitas; and Redemption City facilitates a unique religious mass experience, and a lifestyle informed by religious norms. By focusing on the â€œway of doing thingsâ€? from an actor and everyday perspective and the
al Prayers elaborate how new types of overlapping structures are formed between the secular and sacral in relation to the urban. Both the secular and sacral were always interwoven in a multiplicity of ways in urban life, especially in non-Western societies, and can hardly be divided conceptually. Although Western modernity has ascribed strictly and abstractly drawn borders to the religious (see Asad 2003), the Christian churches have always played an important role in urban social organization (through, for example, their religious charity associations) even in a city such as Berlin as the supposed â€œworld capital of atheismâ€? (Berger 2001), a point that often remains unheeded in debates over the â€œreturn of the reli42
GARBIN, DAVID, â€œIntroduction: Believing in the City,â€? Culture and Religion 13, no. 4 (2012), pp. 401â€“4. ABU-LUGHOD, JANET, â€œThe Islamic Cityâ€”Historic Myth, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance,â€? International
GARMANY, JEFF, â€œReligion and Governmentality: Understanding Governance in Urban Brazil,â€? Geoforum 41, no. 6
Journal of Middle East Studies 19, no. 2 (1987), pp. 155â€“76. ALSAYYAD, NEZAR, AND ANANYA ROY, â€œMedieval Modernity: On Citizenship and Urbanism in a Global Era,â€? Space and Polity 10, no. 1 (2006), pp. 1â€“20. ALSAYYAD, NEZAR, â€œThe Fundamentalist City?,â€? in The Fundamentalist City? Religiosity and the Remaking of Urban Space. ed. Nezar AlSayyad and Mejgan Massoumi. London and New York, 2010, pp. 3â€“26. ALSAYYAD, NEZAR, AND MEJGAN MASSOUMI (EDS.), The Fundamentalist City? Religiosity and the Remaking of Urban Space. London and New York, 2010. AMIN, ASH, AND NIGEL THRIFT, Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Malden, 2002. ASAD, TALAL, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Palo Alto, CA, 2003. BAYAT, ASEF, Street Politics. New York, 1997. BAYAT, ASEF, â€œFrom â€˜Dangerous Classesâ€™ to â€˜Quiet Rebelsâ€™: Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South,â€? International Sociology 15, no. 3 (2000), pp. 533â€“57. BAYAT, ASEF, â€œGlobalization and the Politics of the Informals in the Global South,â€? Urban Informality. Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia, ed. Ananya Roy and Nezar AlSayyad. Lanham, MD, 2004, pp. 79â€“102. BAYAT, ASEF, â€œPolitik der Strasse. ArmutsbevĂślkerung and stĂ¤dtisches Handeln,â€? in .DEXO7HKHUDQĚ†)LOPODQGschaften, StĂ¤dte unter Stress und MigrationHG6DQGUD6FKlIHU-RFKHQ%HFNHUDQG0DGHOHLQH%HUQVWRUIIPHWUR=RQHV 6, Berlin, 2006. BAYAT, ASEF, â€œRadical Religion and the Habitus of the Dispossessed: Does Islamic Militancy Have an Urban Ecology?,â€? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31, no. 3 (2007), pp. 579â€“90. BAYAT, ASEF, Leben als Politik. Wie ganz normale Leute den Nahen Ostern verĂ¤ndern. Berlin, 2012. BEAUMONT, JUSTIN, â€œIntroduction: Faith-based Organisations and Urban Social Issues,â€? Urban Studies 45, no. 10 (2008), pp. 2011â€“17. BEAUMONT, JUSTIN, AND CHRISTOPHER BAKER (EDS.), Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory and Practice. London and New York, 2011a. BEAUMONT, JUSTIN, AND CHRISTOPHER BAKER (EDS.), â€œIntroduction: The Rise of the Postsecular City,â€? in Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory and Practice. London and New York, 2011b, pp. 1â€“11. BECKER, JOCHEN, AND STEPHAN LANZ (EDS.), Space//Troubles. Jenseits des Guten Regierens: Schattenglobalisierung, GeZDOWNRQĂ€LNWHXQGVWlGWLVFKHV/HEHQPHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ BECKER, JOCHEN, ET AL. (EDS.), Learning from* StĂ¤dte von Welt, Phantasmen der Zivilgesellschaft, informelle Organisation,PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ BERGER, PETER, â€œPostscript,â€? in Peter Berger and the Study of Religion, ed. Linda Woodhead, Paul Heelas, Peter Martin. London and New York, 2001, pp. 189â€“98. BIPPUS, ELKE (ED.), Kunst des Forschens. Praxis eines Ă¤sthetischen Denkens.%HUOLQDQG=Â ULFK BIRMAN, PATRICIA (ED.), ReligiĂŁo e espaĂ§o pĂşblico. SĂŁo Paulo, 2003. BROOKS-HIGGINBOTHAM, EVELYN, Righteous Discontent: The Womenâ€™s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880â€“ 1920. Cambridge, MA, 1993. COLLIER, STEPHEN J., AND AIHWA ONG, â€œGlobal Assemblages, Anthropological Problems,â€? in Global Assemblages, Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed. Aihwa Ong and Stephen Collier. Malden and Oxford, 2005, pp. 3â€“21. COX, HARVEY, The Secular City. New York et al., 1990. COX, HARVEY, )LUHIURP+HDYHQ7KH5LVHRI3HQWHFRVWDO6SLULWXDOLW\DQGWKH5HVKDSLQJRI5HOLJLRQLQWKH7ZHQW\ÂżUVW Century. Cambridge, MA, 1995. DAVIS, MIKE, â€œPlanet of Slums,â€? New Left Review 26 (2004), pp. 5â€“34. DE BOECK, FILIP, â€œKinshasa: Tales of the â€˜Invisible Cityâ€™ and the Second World,â€? in Under Siege: Four African Cities Freetown, Johannesburg, Kinshasa, Lagos, HG2NZXL(QZH]RUHWDO2VWÂżOGHUQSSÂą DESPLAT, PATRICK A., AND DOROTHEA E. SCHULZ (EDS.), Prayer in the City: The Making of Muslim Sacred Places and Urban Life. Bielefeld, 2012. DOVEY, KIM, â€œUprooting Critical Urbanism,â€? City 15, nos. 3â€“4 (2011), pp. 347â€“54. ECKERT, JULIA, â€œSundar Mumbai. Die stĂ¤dtische Gewaltordnung der selektiven Staatlichkeit,â€? in Space//Troubles. JenVHLWV GHV *XWHQ 5HJLHUHQV 6FKDWWHQJOREDOLVLHUXQJ *HZDOWNRQĂ€LNWH XQG VWlGWLVFKHV /HEHQ, ed. Jochen Becker and Stephan Lanz, PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą EDENSOR, TIM, AND MARK JAYNE (EDS.), Urban Theory beyond the West: A World of Cities. London and New York, 2012. FARĂ?AS, IGNACIO, â€œIntroduction: Decentering the Object of Urban Studies,â€? in Urban Assemblages. How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, ed. Ignacio FarĂas and Thomas Bender. London and New York, 2010, pp. 1â€“24. FARĂ?AS, IGNACIO, â€œThe Politics of Urban Assemblage,â€? City 15, nos. 3â€“4 (2011), pp. 365â€“74. FOUCAULT, MICHEL, â€œGesprĂ¤ch mit Ducio Trombadori,â€? Schriften in vier BĂ¤nden: Dits et Ecrits, Vol. IV, 1980â€“1988. Frankfurt am Main, 2005. GABRIEL, KARL, â€œJenseits von SĂ¤kularisierung und Wiederkehr der GĂśtter,â€? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 52 (2008), pp. 9â€“15.
(2010), pp. 908â€“18. GOH, ROBBIE B. H., â€œMarket Theory, Market Theology: The Business of the Church in the City,â€? in Postsecular Cities. Space, Theory and Practice, ed. Justin Beaumont and Christopher Baker. London, 2011, pp. 50â€“68. GOLDHILL, SIMON, Jerusalem. City of Longing. Cambridge and London, 2008. GĂ“MEZ, LILIANA, AND WALTER VAN HERCK (EDS.), The Sacred in the City. London and New York, 2012. HALL, STUART, â€œThe West and the Rest: Discourse and Power,â€? in Formations of Modernity, ed. Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben. Cambridge, 1992, pp. 275â€“320. HANCOCK, MARY, AND SMRITI SRINIVAS, â€œSpaces of Modernity: Religion and the Urban in Asia and Africa,â€? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32, no. 3 (2008), pp. 617â€“30. HARVEY, DAVID, â€œThe Right to the City,â€? New Left Review 53 (2008), pp. 23â€“40. HOLLOWAY, JULIAN, AND OLIVER VALINS, â€œEditorial: Placing Religion and Spirituality in Geography,â€? Social & Cultural Geography 3, no. 1 (2002), pp. 5â€“9. HUFFSCHMID, ANNE, â€œAnother Way of Knowing. Notes on Visual Research on Ghosts and Spirits,â€? in Faith is the Place: the Urban Cultures of Global Prayers, ed. PHWUR=RQHVPHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ INURA, THE METROPOLITAN MAINSTREAM INURA PROJECT (2011). $YDLODEOH DW KWWSZZZLQXUDRUJQPPBSRVWHUVKWPO [last accessed January 27, 2013]. IVAKHIV, ADRIAN,ÂłÂľ7RZDUGDÂľ*HRJUDSK\RI5HOLJLRQÂś0DSSLQJWKH'LVWULEXWLRQRIDQ8QVWDEOH6LJQLÂżHUÂ´Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96, no. 1 (2006), pp. 169â€“75. JACOBS, JANE M., â€œCommentary â€“ Comparing Comparative Urbanisms,â€? Urban Geography 33, no. 6 (2012), pp. 904â€“14. KALLENBERGER, MAGDALENA, AND DOROTHEA NOLD, â€œRaumtausch,â€? in Faith is the Place: the Urban Cultures of Global Prayers, ed. PHWUR=RQHVPHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą KALTMEIER, OLAF, â€œMethoden dekolonisieren. ReziprokitĂ¤t und Dialog in der herrschenden Geopolitik des Wissens,â€? Methoden kolonisieren. Eine Werkzeugkiste zur Demokratisierung der Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften, ed. Olaf Kaltmeier and Sarah Corona Berkin. Munich, 2012, pp. 18â€“44. KONG, LILY, â€œMapping â€˜Newâ€™ Geographies of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity,â€? Progress in Human Geography 25, no. 2 (2001), pp. 211â€“33. LANZ, STEPHAN, â€œâ€˜Wo Bosnien mitten in Brasilien beginnt ...â€™ Urbane Ordnungen jenseits des Guten Regierens,â€? in 6SDFH7URXEOHV-HQVHLWVGHV*XWHQ5HJLHUHQV6FKDWWHQJOREDOLVLHUXQJ*HZDOWNRQĂ€LNWHXQGVWlGWLVFKHV/HEHQ, ed. -RFKHQ%HFNHUDQG6WHSKDQ/DQ]PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą LANZ, STEPHAN (ED.), City of Coop. ErsatzĂśkonomien und stĂ¤dtische Bewegungen in Rio de Janeiro und Buenos Aires, PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ LANZ, STEPHAN, â€œâ€˜In Europa mehr Initiative und Kraft entwickelnâ€™ HerrschaftsverhĂ¤ltnisse im globalen StĂ¤dtesystem des Postkolonialismus,â€? in Multiple City: citykonzepte 1908/2008, ed. Sophie Wolfrum and Susanne Schaubeck. Berlin, 2008, pp. 294â€“8. LANZ, STEPHAN, ET AL. (EDS.), Funk the City. Sounds und stĂ¤dtisches Handeln aus den Peripherien von Rio de Janeiro und Berlin,PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ LANZ, STEPHAN, â€œPentecostal Lifestyle and the Urban Everyday Culture,â€? in Faith is the Place: the Urban Cultures of Global Prayers,HGPHWUR=RQHVPHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą LEEZENBERG, MICHEL, â€œHow Ethnocentric is the Concept of the Postsecular?,â€? Exploring the Postsecular: The Religions, the Political and the Urban, ed. Arie L. Molendijk et al. Brill et al., 2010, pp. 91â€“112. MACCABE, COLIN, â€œAn Interview with Stuart Hall,â€? Critical Quarterly 50, nos. 1â€“2 (2008), pp. 12â€“42. MARCUSE, PETER, â€œFrom Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City,â€? City 13, nos. 2â€“3 (2009), pp. 185â€“96. MARSHALL, RUTH, Political Spiritualities: The Pentecostal Revolution in Nigeria. Chicago and London, 2009. MARTINS, ISABEL, â€œUm 20 Uhr leidet in den Telenovelas keiner Hunger. Das Netzwerk CCAP in Manguinhos,â€? in City of Coop. ErsatzĂśkonomien und stĂ¤dtische Bewegungen in Rio de Janeiro und Buenos Aires, HGPHWUR=RQHVHG6WHSKDQ /DQ]PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą MBEMBE, ACHILLE, AND SARAH NUTALL, â€œWriting the World from an African Metropolis,â€? Public Culture Vol. 16, no. 3 (2004), pp. 347â€“72. MCFARLANE, COLIN, â€œThe Comparative City: Knowledge, Learning, Urbanism,â€? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34, no. 4 (2010), pp. 725â€“42. MCFARLANE, COLIN, â€œAssemblage and Critical Urbanism,â€? City 15, no. 2 (2011a), pp. 204â€“24. MCFARLANE, COLIN, â€œEncountering, describing and transforming urbanism,â€? City 15, no. 6 (2011b), pp. 731â€“9. MCFARLANE, COLIN, â€œThe city as assemblage: dwelling and urban space,â€? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (2011c), pp. 649â€“71. MCLEOD, HUGH, Piety and Poverty. Working-Class Religion in Berlin. London and New York, 1996. METROZONES (ED.), Urban Prayers. Neue religiĂśse Bewegungen in der globalen Stadt.PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQDQG+DPburg, 2011. METROZONES (ED.), Faith is the Place: the Urban Cultures of Global Prayers.PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ
MEYER, BIRGIT (ED.), â€œFrom Imagined Communities to Aesthetic Formations: Religious Mediations, Sensational Forms, and Styles of Binding,â€? in Aesthetic Formations. Media, Religion, and the Senses. New York, 2009, pp. 1â€“30. MEYER, BIRGIT, Mediation and the Genesis of Presence: Towards a Material Approach to Religion. Utrecht, 2012. MIGNOLO, WALTER, â€œThe Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference,â€? The South Atlantic Quarterly 10, no. 1 (2002), pp. 57â€“96. NADER, LAURA, â€œComparative Consciousness,â€? in Assessing Cultural Anthropology, ed. Robert Borofsky. Hawaii, 1994, pp. 84â€“96. NIJMAN, JAN, â€œIntroductionâ€”Comparative Urbanism,â€? Urban Geography 28, no. 1 (2007), pp. 1â€“6. ONG, AIHWA, â€œWorlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global,â€? in Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, ed. Ananya Roy and Aihwa Ong. Malden and Oxford, 2011, pp. 1â€“26. ORSI, ROBERTO (ED.), Gods of the City: Religion and the American Urban Landscape. Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1999a. ORSI, ROBERTO (ED.), â€œIntroduction: Crossing the City Line,â€? in Gods of the City: Religion and the American Urban Landscape. Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1999b, pp. 1â€“78. RAYMOND, ANDRĂ‰, â€œIslamic City, Arab City: Orientalist Myths and Recent Views,â€? British Society for Middle Eastern Studies 21, no. 1 (1994), pp. 3â€“18. RAYMOND, ANDRĂ‰, â€œUrban Life and Middle Eastern Cities. The Traditional Arab City,â€? in A Companion to the History of the Middle East, ed. Youssef M. Choueiri. Malden and Oxford, 2008, pp. 207â€“28. ROBINSON, JENNIFER, Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London and New York, 2006. ROBINSON, JENNIFER, â€œCities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture,â€? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35, no. 1 (2010), pp. 1â€“23. ROY, ANANYA, â€œParadigms of Propertied Citizenship: Transnational Techniques of Analysis,â€?8UEDQ$Ě†DLUV5HYLHZ38 (2003), pp. 463â€“91. ROY, ANANYA, â€œThe 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory,â€? Regional Studies 43, no. 6 (2009), pp. 819â€“30. ROY, ANANYA, â€œSlumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism,â€? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35, no. 2 (2011a), pp. 223â€“38. ROY, ANANYA, â€œPostcolonial Urbanism: Speed, Hysteria, Mass Dreams,â€? in Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, ed. Ananya Roy and Aihwa Ong, 2011b, pp. 307â€“35. ROY, ANANYA, AND AIHWA ONG (EDS.), Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden and Oxford, 2011. ROY, OLIVIER, Heilige Einfalt. Ăœber die politischen Gefahren entwurzelter Religion. Munich, 2010. SCHĂ„FER, SANDRA, JOCHEN BECKER, AND MADELEINE BERNSTORFF (EDS.), .DEXO7HKHUDQĚ†)LOPODQGVFKDIWHQ6WlGWH unter Stress und MigrationPHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQ SCHIFFAUER, WERNER, 1DFKGHP,VODPLVPXV(LQH(WKQRJUDSKLHGHU,VODPLVFKHQ*HPHLQVFKDIW0LOOL*|UÂ Ăş. Frankfurt am Main, 2010. SHWAYRI, SOFIA, â€œModern Warfare and the Theorization of the Middle Eastern City,â€? in Urban Theory beyond the West: A World of Cities, ed. Tim Edensor and Mark Jayne. London and New York, 2012, pp. 261â€“72. SIMONE, ABDOUMALIQ, In Whose Image: Political Islam and Urban Practices in Sudan. Chicago and London, 1994. SIMONE, ABDOUMALIQ, â€œOn the Worlding of African Cities,â€? African Studies Review 44, no. 2 (2001), pp. 15â€“41. SIMONE, ABDOUMALIQ, City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. New York and Oxon, 2010. SIMONE, ABDOUMALIQ, â€œThe Surfacing of Urban Life,â€? City 15, nos. 3â€“4 (2011), pp. 355â€“64. TESCHNER, KLAUS, â€œStruggle as a Sacrament. Religion und stĂ¤dtische Bewegungen in Afrika,â€? in Urban Prayers. Neue religiĂśse Bewegungen in der globalen city, HG0HWUR=RQHV0HWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą TUGAL, CIHAN, â€œDie Anderen der herrschenden Stadt. Die NeugrĂźndung der Stadt durch InformalitĂ¤t und Islamismus,â€? in Self Service City: IstanbulHG2UKDQ(VHQDQG6WHSKDQ/DQ]PHWUR=RQHV%HUOLQSSÂą VĂ SQUEZ, MANUEL A., More than Belief. A Materialist Theory of Religion. Oxford and New York, 2011. WARD, KEVIN, â€œTowards a Relational Comparative Approach to the Study of Cities,â€? Progress in Human Geography 34, no. 4 (2010), pp. 471â€“87. WINSTON, DIANE, â€œâ€˜The Cathedral of the Open Airâ€™: The Salvation Armyâ€™s Sacralization of Secular Space, New York City, 1880â€“1910,â€? in Gods of the City: Religion and the American Urban Landscape, ed. Roberto Orsi. Bloomington and Indianapolis, 1999, pp. 367â€“92.
Lagos Strip SABINE BITTER AND HELMUT WEBER
“Architecture in this landscape becomes a symbol in space rather than a form in space” (Venturi et al. 1972).
As part of the infrastructural modernization
the series of camps and congress halls, with
of Nigeria, the Lagos–Ibadan Expressway
capacity for masses of people, along the
was constructed between 1976 and 1979. It
highway entail multiple meanings. In leav-
starts at the municipal border of Lagos and,
ing behind the city these sites offer a symbol
by crossing the federal state of Ogun, it has
of hope and prosperity to the middle classes,
strategically connected the political capital
but mainly, they provide respite to the low-
(until 1991) and commercial center of the
er class population who suffer from living
country with Ibadan, Nigeria’s second most
under informal and precarious conditions
important city. The expressway has been
in Lagos. In addition, these camps serve a
the key for the transportation of agricultur-
social and political imagination, which ac-
al and industrial products and resources.
cuses the city of being dark, godless, and
Since its independence in 1960, and its for-
dystopian, and see Lagos as an outcome of
mation as a nation-state in 1963, Nigeria’s
the failures of modernization and decoloni-
wealth has been based largely on oil re-
sources. The nation’s oil revenues increased
These emergent “Cities of God” along the
during the oil crises in 1973 and 1979, but
Lagos–Ibadan Expressway became the
Nigeria faced a severe economic crisis in the
main focus in our research on the represen-
mid-1980s, which has affected the country
tation of architectures, buildings, and spac-
and the city of Lagos until the present.
es produced by new religious movements
Since the mid-1980s, the presence of Pen-
in Lagos. In our series of works, “All Will
tecostal churches on the interstate highway
Be Well: Religion Industries” (2012) we
has also increased, through property acqui-
looked at a complex mix of Fordistic and
sition. Today, the road is home to mainly
post-Fordistic modalities in the production,
Pentecostal prayer camps, a few Evangelical
distribution, and consumption of religious
Christian Churches and one Islamic camp.
goods and spaces, and how their growing
The compounds of housing developments,
social-political, cultural, and economic im-
banking institutions, and private universi-
portance affects the city and its inhabitants.
ties, and prayer camps—most prominent-
In “Lagos Strip” we approach visibility,
ly the Redeemed Christian Church of God
image-ability, and the symbolic and formal
(RCCG) forty-two kilometers outside La-
aspects of prayer camps.
gos 1 —are representative of the growth of
Driving along the expressway and passing by
the economic and social importance of the
these strangely familiar popular religious-
new Evangelical churches. Even though the
based architectures with their symbolic or-
location of “sacred spaces” in rural areas is
der of signs, billboards, and gates, we were
common to Nigerian indigenous religions,
reminded of an earlier debate on the rela-
1 See Asonzeh Ukah’s contribution in this volume.
carried out in the 1960s and ’70s.
tionship between image and architecture
In his recently published book, The Art-
at distance from the car, and the drawings
Architecture Complex (2011), Hal Foster
of the architectural elements of entrances
shift from modernism to postmodernism,
HUQLVW UHĂ€HFWLRQV RI WKLV SDUWLFXODU XUEDQ
and gates of â€œLagos Strip,â€? articulate the debate of failed modernization and postmod-
through the oppositional approaches of Venturi et al. (op. cit.) and Reyner Banham.
In Theory and Design in the First Machine
a religion-based industry.
Age (1960), Banham advocates a radical up-
The studies of entrances and gates in â€œLagos
dating of modernist design and form-giving
Stripâ€? express both the multiple choices and
WKURXJK DQ H[SUHVVLYH 3RSLQĂ€XHQFHG
the offers of religious organizations, and
â€œimage-abilityâ€? of the Second Machine Age.
obviously indicate the way the churches or-
In contrast, Foster quotes Learning from
ganize the sequences of buildings and sites
Las Vegas, in which Venturi et al. criticize
alongside the Stripâ€”where these camps
modernist architecture for its disconnec-
compete for recognition. As a montage,
tion both from society and history through
â€œLagos Stripâ€? 2 proposes further engagement
its commitment to an abstract modernity.
with the questions of what is â€œbehindâ€? these
Therefore, they could argue, the modern
symbols and architectural forms, and what â€œfutureâ€? they promise.
paradigm of the â€œduck,â€? in which the form expresses function sculpturally, must cede to the postmodern model of the â€œdecorated shed.â€? In their understanding, this meant a building that has a rhetorical facade and a conventional body, and where space and structure are directly at the service of the program, and ornament is applied independently of them. Foster is ultimately skeptical about the postmodern shift in architecture, which he perceives as always contextual, alluding to
BANHAM, REYNER, Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. London, 1960. BITTER, SABINE, AND HELMUT WEBER, â€œAll Will be Well: Religion Industries,â€? in Faith is the Place: the Urban Cultures of Global Prayers, ed. metroZones, metroZones 11. Berlin, 2012, pp. 94â€“105. FOSTER, HAL, The Art-Architecture Complex. London, 2011. UKAH, ASONZEH, â€œRedeeming Urban Spaces: The Ambivalence of Building a Pentecostal City in Lagos, Nigeria,â€? in Global Prayers Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City, ed. Jochen Becker et al. Berlin, 2013. VENTURI, ROBERT, DENISE SCOTT BROWN, AND STEVEN IZENOUR,
Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA, 1972, p. 13.
the civic and the commercial into a socially inclusive symbolism of the â€œeveryday.â€? He doubts that these social inscriptions in architecture have ever been a form of the democratization of built space, but instead have just remained a mere projection of the desire for this democratization. These queries are useful to consider the â€œLagos Stripâ€? and its mix of symbols, signs, architectures, and images that evolve out of competing religious, commercial, and social
2 7KHPRQWDJHRISKRWRJUDSKVDQGVNHWFKHVZDVÂżUVWSUHVHQWHG as a video-loop at Global Prayers: Redemption and Liberation in the City, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, in 2012.
interests, driven by the popularization of religion. The montage of photographs taken 138
Deconstructing the Fundamentalist City?
Religiously Urban and Faith in the City: 5HÃ€HFWLRQVRQWKH Movements of the <RXWKLQ&HQWUDO$IULFD and Southeast Asia
,QWKHUXQXSWRWKHFRQWHQWLRXV6HQHJDOHVHHOHFWLRQVRQ)HEUXDU\WKRXVDQGVRI PRVWO\\RXQJSHRSOHKDYHWDNHQWRWKHVWUHHWVXQGHUWKHXPEUHOODRI0 1,QWKHSURFHVV
U HOLJLRXVJDWKHULQJSODFH/RRNLQJDWVRPHRIWKH'DNDUEORJVLQWKHDIWHUPDWKRIWKHDWWDFN LQWHUHVWLQJUHIHUHQFHLVPDGHWRWKH\RXWKÂ¶VFKDQWVLQYRNLQJÂ³WKHWKHIWRIRXUWLPHÂ´,WLVDV
HYHQWKHPRVWFRPSXWHUYLUXVLQIHVWHGVOXPVÂ²WKH barriosbidonvilles and kampungsâ€” FRQWLQXHWRSDFNLQWKH\RXWKZKRLVNHHQWRDFFHVVVRFLDOPHGLDVLWHVZLWKDOEHLWVORZEXW
PRYHÂ¿UVWPDNH\RXUPRYHPDNHLWELJDQGWKHQZDLWDQGVHHZKDWKDSSHQV$WWKHVDPH 1 7KH6HQHJDOHVH-XQH0RYHPHQW0 ZDVIRUPHGLQLQRSSRVLWLRQWR3UHVLGHQW$EGRXOD\H:DGHÂ¶VYLFWRU\
ABDOUMALIQ SIMONE 156
RXWÂ´ 1RZ RI FRXUVH DOO RI WKLV LV D ORW RI ZRUN DQG D VWUDLQ IRU UHVLGHQWV DOUHDG\ RYHU-
PDQGV PDGH RQ WKH ODERU PDUNHW KDYH UHTXLUHG WKH DELOLW\ WR JHQHUDWH LQFRPH IURP
ligations and turn themselves into enterprising individuals in order to have a shot at the
ULJKWO\ DUH FRQFHUQHG ZLWK FRVW HIÂ¿FLHQFLHV 6WLOO WKH JHQHUDOL]DWLRQ RI HOLJLELOLW\ DV WKH
PDLQ DSSURDFK WR FULVHV PDQDJHPHQW IDLOV WR WDNH KHDGRQ WKH FKDOOHQJHV RI GHFHSWLRQ
LPSOLHG WKH VXVSHQVLRQ RI HYHU\GD\ RUGHU DQG VHOIGLVFLSOLQH VR WKDW SHRSOH FRXOG SXW
WKHSHRSOHGRQRWTXHXH2IFRXUVHWKLVLVDQLQYHUVLRQRIWKHFRQYHQWLRQDOORJLFRIWKLQJV WKHPVHOYHVIURPWKHUHVROXWLRQRIWKHFULVLVEXWDUHDOVRUHVSRQVLEOHIRULWVSHUSHWXDWLRQ WDLQDELOLW\ RU D EHWWHU OLYHOLKRRG WKXV ZRQÂ¶W DUULYH EHFDXVH WKH SRWHQWLDO UHFLSLHQWV RI WK\RIWKHP)XUWKHUPRUHXQZRUWKLQHVVLVWKHYHU\WKLQJWKDWNHHSVWKHVHWKLQJVIURP
FODVVHWKQLFLGHQWLW\RUSROLWLFDODVSLUDWLRQ$VVXFKWKHSHRSOHWKHSRSXORXVRIWKHFLW\ KDYHWREHLQYHQWHG$V9LFHQWH5DIDHO SXWVLWÂ³PLVVLQJÂ´LVDGLIIHUHQWNLQGRIVWDWH
2Q WKH RQH KDQG WKHUH LV HQRXJK HYLGHQFH WR EH FRQYLQFHG WKDW FLW\ OLIH HYHU\ZKHUH LV
RZQ LQLWLDWLYHVÂ²LQ YDULRXV FRPELQDWLRQV ZKHWKHU ZLWK WKH LQLWLDWLYHV RI LQVWLWXWLRQV RU ZLOODVVXPHDOONLQGVRIVKDSHVDQGVL]HVHFRQRPLFDFWLYLWLHVZLOOWDNHSODFHRQPDQ\OHYHOV
7KLV LV WKH IXQGDPHQWDOLVP RI WKH XUEDQ DQG IDLWK LQ WKH FLW\Â²LW LV KRZ UHVLGHQWV KDYH
ABBAS, ACKBAR, Â³:UHFNLQJ7KHRU\RU3ROLWLFV"Â´$SDSHUSUHVHQWHGDWWKH-RKDQQHVEXUJ:RUNVKRSLQ7KHRU\DQG&ULW-
LFLVP-XO\ DELEUZE, GILLES, Cinema II: The Time Image. 0LQQHDSROLV HAGE, GHASSAN, Â³:DLWLQJRXWWKH&ULVLV2Q6WXFNHGQHVVDQG*RYHUQPHQWDOLW\Â´LQ*+DJHHG Waiting. 0HOERXUQH SSÂ± RAFAEL, VINCENTE, Â³:HOFRPLQJ:KDW&RPHV6RYHUHLJQW\DQG5HYROXWLRQLQ&RORQLDO3KLOLSSLQHVÂ´Comparative Studies in Society and History SSÂ±
Visual Essays 2
Speaking in Tongues: Crowds, Assistants, and Miracles AERNOUT MIK
Popular Cultures of Conversion
On â€œSpeaking in Tonguesâ€?: Experiences of Researching Religious Practices
In the context of Global Prayers, Dutch artist Aernout Mik is developing a multi-screen video installation exploring manifestations of current transnational religious movements (with focus on Pentecostalism) that promise liberation and prosperity to the individual, while at the same time operating as corporate companies that structure social and urban life. In preparation for this project, entitled â€œSpeaking in Tonguesâ€? (cf. the visual essay in this volume), Aernout Mik and the cultural anthropologist and Global Prayers-Fellow Martijn Oosterbaan (cf. his contribution to this volume) met up with Jochen Becker in Amsterdam. On their agenda were research strategies and the search for apt ways to UH SUHVHQWUHOLJLRXVSUDFWLVHVLQWKH*OREDO6RXWK$WWKHVDPHWLPH$HUQRXW0LNRĚ†HUV insight into his production process.
JOCHEN BECKER: Maybe we could start with Aernoutâ€™s reaction to the Global Prayers pro-
posal. We showed you piles of photos as well as books and videos. And we talked quite extensively about what we had observed. I think we share interests in those kinds of observations, contradictions, or the blurriness of things. AERNOUT MIK: Can you remember why you guys asked me? Iâ€™m not the obvious artistic re-
searcher. JOCHEN BECKER: We liked the skipping between the one and the other within your works.
,QFRQWUDVWWRDQHVVD\ÂżOP\RXJHWDNLQGRIPRUHVHQVXDODSSURDFKDQG\RXDUHPRUH within a situation. What actually caught my interest was your installation at the Venice Biennale 2007. Where, on the one side, you re-enacted asylum conditions, and where there were related videos, artistic productions, but also found-footage videos. Plus a clever catalogue Citizens and Subjects, where the National Pavilion of The Netherlands positioned
what social-political sphere, but on the other side, having a lot of reference, artistically, to
GRFXPHQWDU\ÂżOPV7KHUHZDVDYHU\FOHDUGLYLGHEHWZHHQWKHQRWLRQRIDGRFXPHQWDU\ found-footage approach and those kinds of quite ordinary situations, which are obviously staged: people donâ€™t behave naturally, so to speak. AERNOUT MIK: My interest in joining the Global Prayers project was indeed the sense of
blurriness I felt about the whole subject, I mean the range of itâ€”the global rangeâ€”all the footage that I saw from the start. I approached the project not so much from the angle: Iâ€™m going on a location to do in-depth social-anthropological research there, but took a more distanced approach; where do these places, happenings, and spaces open up to? What kind of things do they share with completely different spaces, geographically, but also as a whole conceptual structure? That was really the starting point to investigate in all the visual material you showed me, but, of course, I also collected a lot of extra material, where these connections became visible. The connections appear to be visible between different places; for instance, the links between Nigeria and Rio. But also that the spaces were connecting with completely different spaces as well, that they were all, in a way, blurry situations: that they are on the crossroads of different worlds, that there is a strange way of adaptation to
AERNOUT MIK AND MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN IN CONVERSATION WITH JOCHEN BECKER 464
a very wide range of references, which are used either in a traditional religious sense, in a business sense, or in a media sense, or in the sense of a spectacle. Thatâ€™s why itâ€™s also hard 465
to talk about it from one perspective only, because thatâ€™sâ€”enormous crossroads of different things that happen at the same time. JOCHEN BECKER: And this is what broadened our perspective of the global approach. Weâ€™d
tried to point out the global of Global Prayers. AERNOUT MIK: I was cutting it back a little bit, because it was too much to handle actuallyâ€”it
went beyond my range and size very quickly. So thatâ€™s why I also limited it to Pentecostalism in the end; why I focussed it more and more on Rio, because actually Rio in itself is so ... global. It sits on a crossroads of different things that spread out in a global way, already, by itself. JOCHEN BECKER: So the one thing is the global aspect which we could talk about, but the
other thing is the corporate, the business, or the media and event perspective, which we also observed, and which might be the prayer/player thing in the title of our project. In a way, you interpreted both sides of our given title, and maybe you could speak about this kind of entrepreneurial or event/business/media situation that you observed. And which is obviously different to the traditional church service. MEDIA
way that the Catholic churches are located in the cityâ€”itâ€™s a gigantic difference. In every area you see maybe one large Catholic church and then you have hundreds of these different kinds of entrepreneurial Pentecostal churches in all different versions and sizes. So
Shooting â€œSpeaking in Tonguesâ€? at the Haus der Kulturen der Welt, July 2013 (pp. 467â€“75)
itâ€™s completely intertwined with the urban structure at its most foundational level. It starts really smallâ€”you can see this corporate change in the little shopsâ€”and then in other places,
towards the spiritual and religious happening. This is completely speculative but working
bigger versions of the little shops, until you get the very large shop. Thatâ€™s completely, ur-
from two sides towards each other and maybe, partly, in parallel to each other. They probably
banistically speaking, a totally different way and very much like an entrepreneurial struc-
canâ€™t meet really, but I wanted to see what happens; if they operate in relation to each other.
ture. So everyone is kind of inventing himself or herself there. Iâ€™ve also seen these very simple churches, such as one where this young girl was healing
people and the father-pastor was extremely happy that I was there. He offered me this
trip to Rio, and in 2002 I began to live in this favela on the south side of the city, which
[crown of thorns] in the service. Of course, I was scared he would put it on my head. I felt
is surrounded by the wealth of Ipanema and Copacabana. Entering with camera in hand
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: We should talk about in what kind of environment that expectation
that the church was in a state of decline, I was coming from outside, and from an entrepre-
made my movement in the churches much easier. The idea that I was taking pictures and
neurial point of view I was the savior. When he knew we were coming and understood it
documenting visually what was happening in the churches was very helpful. There was this
he made a photomontage of his daughter in front of the Berlin Film festival. For him, the
the representation by these churches, my initial question was how can these Pentecostal
church is like a small business that he must grow and sustain.
churches position themselves in the media age? How do they use media and, of course,
The whole event, even the service itself, of course, is a mixture between something that has
how do they get the funding? Where do they get the resources to be able to use that whole
enormous motivation of the people themselves: â€œCome, take pictures.â€? Being interested in
to do more with entertainment and with television up to a kind of a corporate motivational
trainingâ€”there is this crossover between a mediatized event and a corporate organization,
It seems that in a way these churches, and also the smallest entrepreneurs, are already
a management-like structure and a corporate motivational event. It is an event where there
thinking about the audience/consumers of their productsâ€”in a very late modern, one
is a sense or suggestion of collectivity but, in the end, itâ€™s actually mostly based on individ-
might even say post-modern wayâ€”so they also see all these kinds of possibilities. You only
ual futures, individual prospects, and individual prosperity. And there you have this very
need a crazy guy from Amsterdam whom you perceive is going to be the key to the start of
one-to-one fusion of the material and the spiritual worlds, which in my opinion, you can
your world campaign. And there are these founding myths of the big pastors who also allow
also see in the corporate world itself as the leading thread.
these dreams: letâ€™s say, Edir Macedo of the Universal Church.
I start in my staged part of the project from the other side, approaching the situation from the
AERNOUT MIK: I am in contact with him now actually. It took me half a year to do that, but
viewpoint of a strictly corporate kind of event, and then try to transform this situation more
now we have direct e-mail contact (which turns out to be a dead end actually right now).
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: ,VDOXWH\RXQRZDQG\RXGHÂżQLWHO\GHVHUYHWKLVFURZQRIWKRUQV
back to the entrepreneurial grassroots. But on the other hand, a service with 5,000 people
JOCHEN BECKER: Maybe Aernout needs someone to handle the microphone?
really demonstrates that the Holy Spirit is present and that God has blessed your church.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: That really would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
AERNOUT MIK: The power of God.
AERNOUT MIK: It has nothing to do with the church only as an institutionâ€”itâ€™s all around
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: It is the repetition of bodies, in a way: the more bodies, the more
Macedoâ€™s personality all the time. You see posters of pastors that have a clear celebrity
potent the sign that the Holy Spirit is really present. There is a kind of scale.
structure. The church is very professionally organized, but you see it also in other church-
AERNOUT MIK: But that is a growth model and so, in a sense, it is also a corporate model.
es that are half the way to becoming bigger, that have media coverage already included. I
You start as the small entrepreneur and end up as the big global company.
JOCHEN BECKER: To whom does the size speakâ€”to the inside and/or outside?
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: There has been some good statistical work on who the audiences of
are wearing identical long dresses; their bodies are kind of wiped out; they look like nuns.
the Pentecostal churches actually are. The AssemblĂŠia de Deus, the Assemblies of God, and
Although the space is not very big, it has live, sweeping cameras which make the space look
the Universal Church draw the same public, so to speak. In Rio, one speaks of classes A to
much bigger than it actually is. Screens around the place broadcast what is taking place.
E, class E is the lowest. The two churches draw people from this class but the Universal
Itâ€™s very well edited on the spot. So people are in this service but they have a media aware-
ness of their own presence simultaneously, which is extremely fascinating. Especially in
AERNOUT MIK: Because wealth is related to that church very strongly.
these transitions between the smaller church and the mega-church, you can see the emer-
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Going back to your earlier question, most of these Assemblies of
God churches are located in favelas, they are smaller, and they have more of this idea of
JOCHEN BECKER: Is it an extension of the given space? It might be that you always feel different
solidarity among the members. If you want to look for the kind of leftovers of liberation
AERNOUT MIK: The most powerful thing about the church is that it embraces contemporary
secret of their success, because it is actually not one churchâ€”you could say it is a franchise?
society, it embraces the desire for money and the desire to be present in and through the
media and to the whole world of celebrity. The whole structure of our new liberal society is
convention, but you have a lot of liberty if you get an audience and you are successful.
world that is created.
AERNOUT MIK: Iâ€™m sure the Universal Church is differently organized. MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Indeed. Itâ€™s fascinating that they draw on the same people but do it
in different ways. According to all the people who have written about Universal, you can
JOCHEN BECKER: Is it a self-empowerment of those who otherwise are not seen?
idea that you develop a strong community feeling with the people present, because you can
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: I would be hesitant to go straight to a kind of empowerment. The
go on your way from work, you stop at a certain location and you enter, and itâ€™s the same
kind of service that you can follow when you are close to your own neighborhood church.
AERNOUT MIK: ,WÂśVDNLQGRIVKRSSLQJLQDZD\,WÂśVOLNHDUHWDLOUHOLJLRQ,WÂżWVLQWRDFRQWHP-
in their newspapers. You would see the same kinds of pictures all around the world. But
porary way of living in the city.
JOCHEN BECKER: And the corporate culture too, because it obviously tests that brand or
as personal, or at least thatâ€™s not the only element to it. The idea of you, one, as one of the
identity, which is very eclectic, but somehow keeps it together. Would you say that the
millions of followers is extremely important as an image also.
churches have identities like corporate identities?
AERNOUT MIK: To me, this whole relation between what is the collective and what is the indi-
AERNOUT MIK: The Universal Church is very strong, of course, also with its symbol and the
vidual experience, and what is the individual or the collective message, is unclear. In a way
way the buildings are so clean-looking.
itâ€™s not community oriented; although it is very collectively organized, thereâ€™s some kind of strange paradox there, because it doesnâ€™t speakâ€”the event itself has a community feeling
and the community experience, but outside of that, itâ€™s more akin to something that helps
JOCHEN BECKER: Is it an urban phenomenon? Or have you observed it in a more rural sit-
you in leading your life and striving for the success of your family and career. But, at the
same time, in the service itself and the media coverage of it, there is an extremely strong
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: I think your question is very pertinent, but the fascinating thing is
that, originally, the Assemblies of God came from the north of Brazil. It was structured
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: I often heard the saying â€œWhenever there are two or three people
around a rural model, both in its organizational structure and its political organization. So
praying the Holy Spirit will be present.â€? Even the three of us, we are enough, and this goes
other, saying, â€œThis church really is beyond Christianity.â€? Universal has always been criticized by many people. AERNOUT MIK: But also because theyâ€™re so strong, of course. MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: And it hasnâ€™t stopped them from inventing, at least, the whole range
of fascinating rituals that are completely new, which incorporate all these Afro-Brazilian symbols. AERNOUT MIK: These bigger churches, especially, are very experienced; they are hesitant
about any kind of media interference from outside. So they are open in a way to what they adopt within their own system, but outside, theyâ€™re very much closed. Iâ€™ve been kicked out of churches and stopped although we had permission; I have been asked to stop while the money is being collected. So there are a lot of tensions going on with the rest of society, there, obviously. There are a lot of accusations, not just from other churches, but also from journalists all kinds of signals. There is this idea of a marginalized urban population, which grew, even
about the role of money in the Church. So thatâ€™s the contradiction with the openness of the
under the military dictatorship there, and masses of people came to the city. But itâ€™s still
system and, in a way, Universal is the strongest in that rigidity towards the outside.
AERNOUT MIK: Is it not that the nature of the church has changed simultaneously with
is a secular state and there are clear forces that want to maintain boundaries between what
changes in society? If you think about the speed of growth of the new churches and the
is religious and what is commerce.
way the Catholic Church has been declining in parallel. That does have to do with the way
AERNOUT MIK: A lot of these pastors are gaining political power now; they are running for
society is developing economically, the current precariousness of the labor market, and the
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: There are different political agendas, but still, the idea is that Brazil
HOHFWLRQVDQGDUHJRLQJLQWRORFDOJRYHUQPHQW6RWKHUHÂśVDIRUFHWRLQÂżOWUDWHWKHVHFXODU world. There is this very controversial Pastor Marco Feliciano who has just been elected as president of the human rights commission in Rio. He is extremely homophobic and also
current society than any other church. MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: So perhaps even our old dichotomies of thinking about the city and
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: At a certain point we are confronted with the fact that there are nor-
AERNOUT MIK: â€”that might also explain the kind of limitations of this case study in Rio,
mative borders where we think religion begins and politics ends, or the other way around.
because it could also be a smaller city or bigger village somewhere else, I donâ€™t think itâ€™s fundamentally different.
outside, because we are not outside of it. I want to get towards this intrinsic combination
JOCHEN BECKER: Whatâ€™s at the core of it compared to the traditional Catholic Church?
between the two.
But what we actually see is that religion, politics, and commerce are strongly connected.
to make a study of religion as something outside of us; as something we observe from
These kinds of enterprises are very fast, can be very eclectic and pragmatic, so how do they control their inner rules, what is the constitution of it? Is it the Bible? AERNOUT MIK: In all those things Iâ€™ve seen, the Bible doesnâ€™t play such a big role. If they use
JOCHEN BECKER: ,ZLOOIROORZXSRQWKDWSRLQWEXWÂżUVW,ZRXOGOLNHWRSLFNXSRQWKHTXHV-
it, itâ€™s often in the form of a small quotation and a lot of the talk goes on about other things,
tion of politics: obviously religion can be a moral system, which more or less is powerless
beyond its own space. Or it is extended, as we see especially in the more militant Islamic
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: For the Universal Church the Bible is more a book to quote from.
situations or other very dominant religious systems, where it rules the whole city or even
Whatâ€™s fascinating is, going back to these different churches in historical moments, that
the whole state. In Nigeria, the Pentecostal Church takes over society as a political-moral
AERNOUT MIK: You mean within the church or between the churches?
quite out of control. You described the nun-like bodiless look.
power. And on the other side, for example in Rio where body-culture is exposed, it seems
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Between the churches. Iâ€™m not a historian, but it seems that it
AERNOUT MIK: That church was quite an exception, because, generally, the churches are
would be incredibly interesting to compare the European schisms and the many bran-
not so strict on women in terms of clothing. Thereâ€™s this whole thing of paying tribute/
ches of Protestantism in Europe with contemporary Brazil. In Holland, all these events
respect to God: men often wear suits, but there are also people in very casual dress and
were always about ruptures and then balancing the equilibrium between different voices.
with naked arms. Itâ€™s mostly worldly and connects to a contemporary condition of society,
That could help when thinking about how churches in Brazil are constantly accusing each
so itâ€™s not an outside system that is imposed on the existing system.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: The classical Pentecostals were very rigid about bodily behavior, but
I would hesitate to suggest that I would know where the staging begins or ends.
also about dress. And even when looking at Pastor Marcos Pereira for instanceâ€”
AERNOUT MIK: I didnâ€™t ask if you knew where the staging began and stopped because I donâ€™t
AERNOUT MIK: They walk like royalty, theyâ€™re very proud.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: (YHQZKHQDWWKHÂżUVWJODQFH\RXPLJKWVD\Âł2KWKLVLVDNLQGRI
think you can locate it like that, but I do think that the intrinsic element of it is one of
rigid body culture,â€? actually, I see performance more than I see discipline.
For instance, at some Assemblies of God, they were dancing in trance excessively. Itâ€™s com-
staged-ness, the sense of performance in there. It varies a bit between the various churches.
AERNOUT MIK: There very much is a performative side to all of it.
ing strongly from the physical movements and not so much from a staged group-spectacle.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: One should observe how they are affecting legislation for instance.
Like I imagine it is in Universal, where it seems to be more like a set, a public event to wit-
There are signs that they are siding with more conservative groups, but there are also Pen-
ness. But, in both, I think some of the staged-ness allows it to happen, maybe thatâ€™s more
tecostal movements that are siding with more liberal social movements.
AERNOUT MIK: The Catholic Church is probably stricter on homosexuality then many
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: I approached it from the idea that maybe we can look at Brazilian so-
ciety to think about what staging means. There is also a history of political staging. For in-
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Actually there are Pentecostal pastors who are much more pro-
stance, when I spoke to my former tutor of Brazilian studies here in Amsterdam, constantly
abortion than some other religious leaders.
he would tell me that the staging of power, the visual staging, really reminds him of Brazil
least he gave me an indication that there is a tradition of staging. Certain things are the way
AERNOUT MIK: How do you see the relation between Pentecostalism and neoliberalism?
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: 3HQWHFRVWDOLVPÂżWVYHU\ZHOOZLWKWKH$PHULFDQGUHDP
AERNOUT MIK: You see two kinds of histories there, one is of course the history of political
AERNOUT MIK: If you believe, you will be prosperous.
staging, but then the other is the relation to television shows. I think thatâ€™s partly local,
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: There is a kind of old Weberian Protestant ethic: that one must work
partly not at all local, because thatâ€™s taking place globally. For instance, the emergence of
hard, quit drinking, avoid drugs, resist committing adultery etc., which provides a self-
reality shows where ordinary people on the stage are being put in extraordinary emotional
my television ...,â€? and so on. There are all these material proofs of the fruits of the conver-
situationsâ€”there is a very strong crossover, in my view, with the staged testimonies and â€œwondersâ€? of the Pentecostal churches.
sion. This idea that one can make it, of course, is the only thing that is reproduced in all the
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: It doesnâ€™t really matter if you watch television shows of the Uni-
videos. The Universal Church has made a whole economy out of it.
versal Church, Oprah Winfrey, or Dr. Phil. In all the shows you see people sitting, saying
AERNOUT MIK: Connected with the miracle as such? We didnâ€™t really touch on the supernat-
things such as, â€œNow this is what happened in my life and it was really, like, misery ...,â€? and
ural, the â€œwonder,â€? which is actually part of the entertainment also. I think itâ€™s also con-
also in terms of the visual imagery; in all the shows they use, like, black-and-white and
nected with the promise of prosperity.
greyish tones when they narrate the â€œbefore.â€?
JOCHEN BECKER: Is it entertainment in the sense that people know it is a fake and they con-
AERNOUT MIK: Yeah, the color is off.
sume the fake?
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: So there are all these kinds of visual techniques.
AERNOUT MIK: I donâ€™t think the feeling is a fake; itâ€™s staged but not a fake.
AERNOUT MIK: But I also think of the structure where they stage games with people who are
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: That remains the great enigma of this phenomenon. Even for peo-
brought into extreme and emotional situations, and in going through that, they experience
ple participating in it. One must understand that there is a very strong tradition of spirit-
some kind of transformational moment, but done in a more physical way.
possession, which the Pentecostals did not invent, and which is about allowing other forces,
JOCHEN BECKER: Is this a post-modern â€œwe know, but we go with it anywayâ€? situation? So is
extra-subjective forces, to take over. Perhaps we are not so well equipped to understand
it a ritual which structures my life, which structures the show, which structures something
what this process is. By mimesis or by performance you learn that there are other forces
which I go with to a certain point? Letâ€™s compare it with a traditional Catholic Church ser-
that can take over and you are but one individual.
vice where you drink and eat the body of Jesus Christ. As a kid I had no big doubts about it.
AERNOUT MIK: But if I say itâ€™s also staged, how would you reply to that?
But after a long while of not attending the church I went to a service and thought itâ€™s canni-
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: I read this really nice article about people who asked this par-
balistic, itâ€™s hedonic. It is very â€œindigenous.â€?
ticular question too, but in an Afro-Brazilian religious context. The central notion in
AERNOUT MIK: You started with the word â€œblurry.â€? And that is the blurry area.
context is that one should dance until the spirits take possession of you. And the partic-
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Even when Iâ€™d known people for a long time they still would see me
ipants would say things like, â€œYeah, I really canâ€™t remember what happened,â€? but when
as the non-believer, so there would always be a sense of keeping the secret.
asked a little bit more they would say things such as, â€œYeah, of course, I do remem-
AERNOUT MIK: At least being in the middle of it, physically, I did not feel an outsider. The
ber,â€? and so there is a kind of remembering and forgetting going on at the same time.
whole physicality of it, the feeling of crossing a border and going back and forwards in
a kind of acceptance was very easy, even stronger in Africa: in Nigeria, religion was completely a thing you pick up and let go. In Rio I experienced a strong difference between the believers, the pastors, and the helpers, letâ€™s say the assistants. The emotions of the attendees were extremely intense and the crossing of the border was taking place, but the people
ZKRVWDJHGLWDQGDOVRWKHPLGGOHÂżJXUHVÂ˛WKH\VHHPHGOLNHWKHSHRSOHMXVWVWUXFWXULQJ it, and I didnâ€™t feel the same kind of intensities from them at all. They were from a totally
different league. They are the in-between people. Theyâ€™re put in a suit, do the money thing, and they help if people fall over. MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: If you study Afro-Brazilian religion in Brazil then it is generally ac-
cepted when you belong to that, somehow, when you believe in it. Speaking of believing is already not really the issue. But if you were an anthropologist in Brazil who â€œconvertsâ€? to a Pentecostal church, people would approach you differently. It took a long time until I started to think about how we construct these boundaries. Somehow there is a sense that if you
AERNOUT MIK: There is a lot of waiting and listening before and afterâ€”and then, suddenly,
really cross that border â€œtheyâ€? have caught you, or that you are one of the dupes who could
itâ€™s there and then itâ€™s over also.
not tell the difference anymore. I like it very much that you say you could feel part of it.
JOCHEN BECKER: It is so controlled in a way. And on the other hand, you have the feeling
AERNOUT MIK: It depends on the place, some of them are completely offensive, actually, and
that people are, in a way, ecstatic.
others the opposite. Most of what Iâ€™m doing is trying to attach to these mimetic impulses
AERNOUT MIK: Basically itâ€™s the same in Rio: if you look back from a distance you see itâ€™s very
that go through a space. Thatâ€™s the entry point of how I look at it or how I try to be in it.
clearly structured. There is always a mixture of clear organization, a very rational structure
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: In the beginning, I played drums during church services. I started
almost, and this intoxication, excess, and ecstasy going on which suddenly leaves again.
my research in this very small Assemblies of God church, and by incidence or coincidence I could be part of the music. I was part of the atmosphere, of the collective production of the
presence of the Holy Spirit, and there it was very hard to say, yeah, what did I feel or how
JOCHEN BECKER: Itâ€™s a kind of frame where it is allowed to happen â€Ś now is the time, so to
did I feel. Iâ€™m not saying that I had, like, a religious experience, butâ€”
speak, and itâ€™s not so triggered, but you live with that, you know it, and then you go with
AERNOUT MIK: Not at all, but letâ€™s say more a kind of acceptance about what happened
that. What I found interesting besides those very performative acts, when people lay down
around me? So if this strange border-crossing happens, okay Iâ€”for this moment, I donâ€™t
and the assistants take off their shoes to help them recover, which is also quite interest-
knowâ€”I kind of understand it, you know? Maybe later not, but at this moment, yes I take it.
ingâ€”not giving them water but taking off their shoes! What seems much more collective in
I donâ€™t see it as an exotic thing anymore. To me this feeling was the strongest in Lagos: you
the one sense, and non-collective in the other, is the speaking in tongues, standing in one
had the notion that the people crossed the borders with enormous ease and naturalness in
place and talking to yourself: suddenly it is not a collective church service anymore, but you
whatever direction and back and forth.
-HQV:HQNHOPDGHWKHÂżOPIRUWKHthe Urban Cultures of Global Prayers exhibition, his
have the feeling that itâ€™s parallel. In the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) when
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Could you say a little bit about how, because I wasnâ€™t in Lagos?
AERNOUT MIK: (VSHFLDOO\WKHVHĂ€RRGVRIVSHDNLQJLQWRQJXHVWKDWVXGGHQO\ULVHXSWKH\
cameraman walked through the rows, you see people all by themselves and itâ€™s not at all a
pick it up and theyâ€™ll drop it down, just like that. I sense itâ€™s a different consciousness, not
collective church service where it re-gathers afterwards. You step out of the collectiveness
a fully different consciousness either, but you see that there is a border crossedâ€”you have
of the church service, even if you are all together speaking in tongues. They form a group,
been in it also. Itâ€™s so collectively done, a very physical experience; they cross it, but a
but on the other side they are so individualized, they have their own performative ways.
moment later everything is just normal and ordinary and they just write things or chat. If
AERNOUT MIK: But itâ€™s neither the one nor the other, and we are still a collective body, but
there was a line in the room somewhere where you can just easily be on top of the line, and
not in a communicative sense.
itâ€™s not, like, now Iâ€™m crossing this gigantic border; itâ€™s only very thin and diffuse, itâ€™s thin-
JOCHEN BECKER: Itâ€™s not synchronized anymore. I saw a presentation of the ethnographer
ner thanâ€”in Rio it was more dramatic with the falling down.
Heike Behrend, who worked in Uganda on exorcism. Armin Linke who is a photographer
JOCHEN BECKER: At The Lordâ€™s Chosen in Lagos, you have a pre-stage arena with sand. And
and video artist, followed her, and he said, â€œFor me, I knew these situations very well be-
there are stands where the camera people are, so they can get it all from a higher viewpoint,
cause it was like earlier when I was a theatre photographer, I didnâ€™t direct it, I just followed
as well as mobile cameras which follow the performance. And that means spinning or cry-
what was being directed.â€? And then he observed that, even when they speak in tongues,
ing and then there are people who try to control the mass of people so that they donâ€™t get KXUW,WLVDWDVSHFLÂżFSRLQWLQWLPHZKHQLWVWDUWVDQGZKHQLWVORZO\VWRSV 474
Iâ€™m also not only just performing it for you, I do it within myself.â€? It was a kind of agreement, 475
and that might also be Aernoutâ€™s position to it. So I would like to talk about your methods
AERNOUT MIK: No, excess is not something which wipes out borders completely and is going
and the ways of observing, describing, and presenting it or analyzing it.
AERNOUT MIK: It was the same when we shot in Lagos. One had a feeling that these people
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Of course we can recognize there are certain kinds of routines, ritu-
are completely out of it and somewhere else with their consciousness. I didnâ€™t experience
al forms, and structures. But then, how people relate to those themselves is very much an
it when I was there, but if I look at the footage closely I often see a sudden blink of an eye
noticing the camera. MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Michael Taussig wrote about this as the way we become part of the per-
formance, not that we are also in it. In general, the speaking in tongues has all the elements of
JOCHEN BECKER: Aernout, you have different methods and ways, which on the one hand
what weâ€™ve been talking about now. I think it differs from one church to another as to how the
have descriptive moments, or what you call the â€œmimetic approach,â€? and on the other
spontaneity and framing are negotiated or how they are balanced. For instance, in most of the
hand, it is a certain kind of analytic gesture. The story of rubber gloves for the police makes
churches where I did research, they would not openly practice speaking in tongues.
it clearer: they use them to keep their distance from the asylum seeker, whom they only
AERNOUT MIK: In Rio itâ€™s not that common.
touch through gloves. So when you have to re-enact things and not just document it, you
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: That actually would be part of the narrative, in that it is sponta-
have to think of every detail. And through looking for every detail you think about why they
QHRXVDQGVRPLPHVLVZRXOGEHOHIWXQUHĂ€HFWHG7KH\ZRXOGVD\Âł,ZDVLQFKXUFKDQGDW a certain point I suddenly â€Ś,â€? you know, â€œand I witnessed people who came to church for
wear gloves, what do rubber gloves mean? That is an analytic approach within your work, EXWLWKDVQRWWKHOLPLWDWLRQVRIDVFLHQWLÂżFZRUN
AERNOUT MIK: The method is always very clearly a double gesture. So itâ€™s an immersing,
point, suddenly, they would allow the spirit to speak.â€? But, on the other hand, there are
where this mimetic moment is taking place, combined with a distancing simultaneously,
many churches where they just openly practice it, but then they would say it is a kind of
but itâ€™s neither one nor the other. And I think part of the distancing comes from the fact
training, to make it easier for the real thingâ€”
that I very often donâ€™t use sound. Your eyes start to follow a completely different kind of
AERNOUT MIK: Itâ€™s a technique.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: ([DFWO\7KH\ZRXOGRSHQO\UHĂ€HFWRQWKHWHFKQLTXHEXWWKHUHLVVWLOO
a lot of space for one to claim that the spirit makes use of that technique, so there is an in-
technique in order to read what you see. So although at one end you are addressed physically by the image, on the other hand, your eyes are reading an image very differently. So this is a double movement of your senses.
What is important is that I try to also de-localize things, especially if Iâ€™m working in a doc-
AERNOUT MIK: The delay.
umentary vein. Even if I stage something, thereâ€™s a moment of de-localization going on.
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: ([DFWO\,ÂżQGLWVXSHUIDVFLQDWLQJEHFDXVHLWWRXFKHVRQWKHVDPH
When I started working on this project I was interested in how these churches look from
questions: what kind of agency is there for people to control them when they want? And
the outside, how they are embedded in the environment, but when I kept on working I
there is really a contradiction, I guess, in saying, â€œNow I have decided to be taken over.â€? Of
course, we do that all the time in life, I guess. But I had different experiencesâ€”some people
ries to come to the fore. So thatâ€™s the non-sociological approach that I have, and also, when
talked of it in terms of being â€œin the game.â€?
I stage there are often situations that are close to something, but they are not really that
AERNOUT MIK: There was this place where a lot of people were healed, they were lying on the
I think, is also where this analytical moment is appearing. You have to have a very active
ent state of consciousness.
something. And that is a means of distancing I use to evoke that approach from the viewer/
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: Trance, hypnosisâ€”undeniable that there are techniques. I donâ€™t
participant with the work. And thatâ€™s also why I try to create environments where you are
approach to, letâ€™s say, the activity of reading a situation instead of simply representing
know how they do it; now, that would be very interesting. I was less interested in that ques-
in relation with the images that are there, thereâ€™s an overly sensorial moment where too
tion at the time because I thought more about how these things work in the public domain.
many sensations are going on, where you continuously have to choose. So again, itâ€™s a mix-
AERNOUT MIK: What interests me, of course, is the relation of real experience and staged-
ture of being immersed and being outside of it.
ness: how this is intertwined and how one meets the other. What happens within these
JOCHEN BECKER: There are two ways: the re-enactment or restagingâ€”
moments of crossing the border, where you still have some kind of doubt; not in the sense
AERNOUT MIK: Speculative staging, I would say, instead of re-enacting.
that I have to solve it, decide if itâ€™s true or not, because that is not the case, but there is a
JOCHEN BECKER: And on the other hand, there might be a factual approach. Up to now you
doubt about how much the whole thing is in itself a performative gesture, and how much
only use found footage extensively, where the media represents itself. So what does that
that triggers a desire and sensation, and creates experience.
mean in terms of a combination of all these different approaches for your planned Global
MARTIJN OOSTERBAAN: We should not be fooled by the idea of spontaneity.
AERNOUT MIK: It doesnâ€™t feel as if thereâ€™s a fundamental difference, actually, at all. When I
and theyâ€™re very structural actually. And of course the relation to media, the recording of
used found footage it was mostly that I used raw, unedited footage and, in a way, I used
it, the feeding it back in the same space, the whole distancing inside the space itself. Then
the same technique on it that I use in the staged work, where I would try to create a sense
thereâ€™s the role of the pastor as a performer, as an executive trainer. I probably wonâ€™t use
of immersion as well as enlarging the categories or structures of it, by means of association
and combining. In a way, now itâ€™s happening with documentary material in the same way, especially because I focus only on the inside of the church and the service, which has no beginning or end: I just use the matter of the service itself, cut-off from the people entering
of course, are things that I push forward. Itâ€™s in the editing always, a result also of a certain
and leaving, and closing off, more as a vacuum; just as a sensation. So it has very much the
it, because thereâ€™s a certain emerging in it and a moving between different energy levels.
same structure as that which Iâ€™m investigating in any kind of staging. Staging, in the end, is
This has to happen in the edit itself.
JOCHEN BECKER: And youâ€™re casting, within the German context, the quite well-known actors
pened in the performance; of course itâ€™s also a real thing, itâ€™s not a joke, itâ€™s not acted, but
Lars Eidinger and Burkhart KlauĂ&#x;ner. It would be quite interesting to think about that kind
partly it is acted. And in that sense, I donâ€™t see the structure of this service as any different.
of leadership, which also goes into the corporate idea of the master of ceremonies, or entre-
JOCHEN BECKER: At an earlier stage of the Global Prayers project you decided to take a
preneurial exploitation as in Lagos. It needs a chief pastor who has the charismatic style, a
documentary path, because you were not sure at that time that you could work with your
person that is also very suggestive. This brings up the question of leadership in general as a
methods of staging for a church service; you were concerned it might be inappropriate or
kind of corporate leadership; a corporate system also needs a kind of spiritual leader.
just not possible.
AERNOUT MIK: This is exactly the point I want to go to. Iâ€™m not re-enacting a church to
AERNOUT MIK: It changed. Initially, I wondered if the intensities could really communicate
produce a corporate thing, I want to create a business event which itself moves towards
on a direct level; Iâ€™m still hesitant about that. But thatâ€™s why I developed them side-by-
a church, itâ€™s a motion towards becoming another space. But I just havenâ€™t managed to
side. So I think they need a certain distance but not that much distance. And actually, my
make that. I canâ€™t say what I want, or what I intend, or whether this is something that really
experience with the performers is that itâ€™s not an impossible thingâ€”you can do analogous
comes together. It depends, largely, on the space and the people, what is possible, what we
activities that, at the same time, are not images of the other thing, not representations of
can do, what we articulate there. So it can become something other than what I intended
the other thingâ€”but they still have to do with whatâ€™s happening in the churches. I think the
it to be.
whole structural element came more to the front, and made it easier for me to relate to the
But maybe, also, I mean, ideally, to create another space there, which actually I donâ€™t know
what it is, but it is not just a critique of corporatism or whatever, but creates a sort of com-
JOCHEN BECKER: So will you separate it? How will the relationship work between, letâ€™s say,
munal event. I would put a question mark, actually, at this point, about what exactly it is.
the documentary and the staged?
But maybe thatâ€™s it also, if you say so; hence to the question that you asked earlier, okay,
AERNOUT MIK: Of course this is an ongoing question, which I can only solve with the ma-
where do these churches go? You see a movement, a pressure in a certain direction. And
terial itself, and itâ€™s also a very tricky one. I have the feeling to go more in the direction of
I think that it is a more speculative thing about where society is heading. This could also
accumulation than in solving it to an articulated point. I also donâ€™t see the point in that,
be approached, maybe even from this corporate world, in a similar direction. Maybe itâ€™s a
because I think there are so many things raised, so many things put in motion. How can
deeper ambition of the work.
I build an analogy where every place, every method, keeps its own kind of integrity. Of
JOCHEN BECKER: How much of that corporate structure governs your life? And isnâ€™t it a kind
course, it could also become a failure. What I initially wanted to useâ€”a kind of montage of
of belief system?
the whole thing completely togetherâ€”I have withdrawn from completely now. Even mixing
AERNOUT MIK: If you name the word corporate you have a certain association of some clear
the churches, Iâ€™m not doing that at this point, theyâ€™re now parallel tracks Iâ€™m working on.
economic structure. But the word corporate itself, of course, has become such a very different thing, which hosts many types of vectors in it all pointing in different directions. And
RE-VIEWING/EDITING JOCHEN BECKER: Earlier, you described that looking through the footage you noticed a kind
it doesnâ€™t have to do with a particular job, or being inside or outside a job, itâ€™s more a kind
of direct eye-contact. What else happens while re-viewing and editing the material?
of a basic condition. If everything is a product, if every experience is a product, itâ€™s not just
AERNOUT MIK: First of all, itâ€™s the nature of the places, the relation they have with secular
matter anymore; it comes into contact with spirituality somehow.
places; how they change, in a way. If you distance yourself, they are able to change more into secular places; itâ€™s the relation, of course, between organization and excess, and what
ZHGLVFXVVHGHDUOLHU%XWWKLVLVZKDW,GRLQHGLWLQJWKLVNLQGRIĂ€RZDQGWKHVWUXFWXUH,WÂśV the function of the helpers, the clothing, the suit, all these kinds of things are sort of guidelinesâ€” 478
GLOBAL PRAYERS Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City EDITED BY Jochen Becker, Katrin Klingan, Stephan Lanz, and Kathrin Wildner MANAGING EDITOR: Martin Hager COORDINATION: Evi Chantzi COPYEDITING // EDITING: Mandi Gomez PROOFREADING: Carolyn Jones DESIGN: Sandy Kaltenborn / image-shift.net & Pierre Maite PRINTING AND BINDING: KĂśsel, Altusried-Krugzell
This book is no. 13 of the metroZones publication series and has been published in cooperation with the Haus der Kulturen der Welt and the Europa-UniversitĂ¤t Viadrina, with the support of the Forum Transregionale Studien, funded by the Senatsverwaltung fĂźr Wirtschaft, Technologie und Forschung Berlin. The publication has been realized within the framework of the research and cultural project Global Prayers: Redemption and Liberation in the City. ,QLWLDWHGLQE\DFDGHPLFVFXUDWRUVDQGDUWLVWVDIÂżOLDWHGZLWKWKHSURMHFWDJHQF\PHWUR=RQHVÂ˛&HQWHU for Urban Affairs, Global Prayers is a joint endeavor of the Haus der Kulturen der Welt and the EuropaUniversitĂ¤t Viadrina. As a research project at the Forum Transregionale Studien, Global Prayers has been granted funds for international, long-time research between 2010 and 2014. With the resources of the humanities and social sciences as well as from artistic production, Global Prayers is generating knowledge of our global present. The work of the research project has been presented to the public during various events in Berlin, Lagos, Beirut, and Mumbai. ÂŠ 2014 Haus der Kulturen der Welt, metroZones, Europa-UniversitĂ¤t Viadrina, and Lars MĂźller Publishers, ZĂźrich Texts by kind permission of the authors. Images by kind permission of the photographers, artists / copyright holders. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any form or manner whatsoever without prior written permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Should, despite our intensive research, any person entitled to rights have been overlooked, legitimate claims should be compensated within the usual provisions. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org. Lars MĂźller Publishers ZĂźrich, Switzerland WWW.LARS-MUELLER-PUBLISHERS.COM
Printed in Germany WWW.GLOBALPRAYERS.INFO WWW.METROZONES.INFO WWW.HKW.DE
Published on Oct 15, 2013
Edited by Jochen Becker, Katrin Klingan, Stephan Lanz and Kathrin Wildner. Published by Lars Mueller Publishers, Zurich | October 2013 ISB...