6 | FLO RIDA S TATE U N IV ERS IT Y COLLEGE O F L AW
Courtney Cahill Donald Hinkle Professor J. D. , YALE U NIV E RS IT Y, 20 0 1 PH . D., CO MPARATIV E LITE RATU RE , P RINCETON UN IVER SIT Y, 1 999 B . A ., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS IT Y, 1993
Universalizing Anonymity Anxiety, _ J.L. & Biosciences _ (forthcoming 2016) Reproduction Reconceived, 101 Minn. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2016) Obergefell and the “New” Reproduction, 100 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 1 (2016) The Oedipus Hex: Regulating Family After Marriage Equality, 49 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 183 (2015) Does the Public Care How the Supreme Court Reasons? Empirical Evidence and Normative Concerns in the Case of Same-Sex Marriage (with Geoffrey Rapp), 93 N.C. L. Rev. 303 (2015) Abortion and Disgust, 48 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 401 (2013)
Professor Courtney Cahill’s article, Reproduction Reconceived, 101 Minnesota Law Review _ (forthcoming 2016), argues that reproductive binarism – the belief that sexual and alternative reproduction merit different treatment in law because they are essentially different in fact – is factually incoherent and constitutionally deficient, and proposes a unitary system of reproductive regulation based on procreative intent rather than procreative mechanics.