Certain procedures are implemented to protect farm produce from pests and plant diseases. Unfortunately, some methods endanger our atmosphere and do not guarantee a good harvest leading to the introduction of crop protection products. In a recent study, the Berlin-based agency Agripol presented the negative effects of pesticides on carbon footprint with cotton as their material. The results of the study entitled “Climate Change and Plant Health” were announced to the general public during the 31st International Cotton Conference in Bremen, Germany. The objectives of their study were: To examine the consumption of energy and other carbon dioxide discharge engaged in the manufacture and utilisation of crop protection agents To evaluate the elevated biomass manufacture and the ensuing extra carbon dioxide emitted in the atmosphere Fourteen cotton products from 16 countries were analysed. In the three countries that have abundant cotton growth, it was found that more carbon dioxide was taken in by the plants compared to what is emitted when crop protection agents were utilised. Carbon dioxide emission was taken over by the extra absorption by a factor of 25 – 50.
This result is clearly manifested in India for irrigated farming. A large consumption of carbon dioxide (about 49.4 kgs.) per hectare resulted to the frequent use of pesticides as against to untreated lands, where about 1,900 kg gas were converted for every hectare. Other motivating elements like irrigation can give a better trail. In summary, the study only proved that crop protection products give farmers more returns and at the same time protect our environment. Article Source - http://herbicidesbrisbane.weebly.com/
Published on Mar 11, 2013
Prevention of some wild pest plants,Agricultural and crop protection,Protect farm produce from pests and plant diseases