Neutrosophic Optimization and its Application on Structural Designs

Page 120

SRi  h  

3 1   Pi   3   h 2

  Eh3  4v 1  v 1.18 1  2  a   1.84    ln   4  3 2 l   100ka   for i  1, 2 Sf

(2.53)

Where   and  E  denote Poisson‟s ratio and modulus of elasticity of cement concrete respectively. l , a, h and S f denote radius of relative stiffness, radius of load contact areas thickness of the slab and flexural strength of concrete respectively. The relation between

 Ni  and  SRi 

for single axle load  i  1 and tandem axle  i  2  is expressed as per IRC

58- 2002 below-

Ni   if SRi  h   0.45   4.2577 Ni     SRi  h   0.4325   0.9718 SRi  h     0.0828  

Ni  10

(2.54)

3.268

if 0.45  SRi  h   0.55

if SRi  h   0.55

(2.55)

(2.56)

Therefore three cases will come up for consideration to demonstrate the stress ratio in terms of fatigue life and axel load. Case I : When Eq.(2.54) is influenced over the Eq.(2.52), the DR remain unchanged as Eq.(2.54) as the relation is trivially true Case II: When Eq.(2.55) is influenced over the Eq.(2.52) the DR is transforms into

3.268 n 2 6.536 2 F1  l , h, k , A1 , A2   365  1  r   1   SR1  h   0.4325  SR2  h   0.4325 A1 A2   0.5  4.2577  r   2

(2.57) Case 3: When Eq.(2.56) is influenced over the equation Eq.(2.52), the DR is expressed as

 365  1  r 2  1  0.25     SR1  h   SR2  h    23.47  Log  A A  F2  l , h, k , A1 , A2   2 Log   1 2    r  0.25 0.0828   

(2.58) In the above expression A is initial number of axle per day in year which is not greater than the sum of initial number of axle per day due to single axle A1 and initial number of axle per day due to tandem axle A2 . Deflection Analysis for Subgrade

Page 106


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.