Page 1

SEC 435 Week 1 Discussion Session Hijacking

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com You will need to create your own original thread. The create thread button is in the upper left corner once you click on the link above. "Session Hijacking" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Consider the “What if” case in Chapter 1 from the Book: Web Applications and Data Servers and respond to one or more of the questions asked. • Research the web, and discuss any recent story concerning session hijacking. Provide summary and discussion on what might have been done to prevent such hijacking, or how such hijacking can be recognized. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight.

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 1 Lab


FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Click the link above to submit your assignment.

Students, please view the "Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment" in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. If you have not logged into the iLabs environment yet, use your access code emailed to you by the bookstore when you purchased the books to register. Lab Assignments Submit each lab based on the following: 1.

Log into the EC-Council iLab environment.

2. Complete the weekly lab assignment described below using ECCouncil iLab. 3. Submit the screenshots for the steps specified in each lab assignment. 4. Write a short answer in Word format and include with the assignment submission link the following: a. Summarize the technical experiences in completing the lab assignment. b.

Identify the commands that were of greatest benefit to you.


c. Provide general comments on the overall lab assignment experience. Note: This is an academic writing assignment. Correct punctuation, grammar, and spelling are necessary. Points may be deducted for poor writing. Lab Assignment 1 Due Week 1 and worth 30 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 1 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures: Web Applications and Data Servers (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 2 Discussion Web Application Threats

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "Web Application Threats" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Review the attacks listed on the OWASP website, located at https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Attack. Focus on


selecting three attacks that you believe to be the greatest security threat, rank what you believe to be the top three greatest security threats (e.g., cookie/session poisoning, platform exploits, etc.), and provide a rationale for your rankings. Explain the key inherent dangers of the chosen threats, and indicate the key reasons why you believe such threats pose more of a risk than other current ones in existence. Justify your answer. • Review the attacks listed on the OWASP website, located at https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Attack. Focus on selecting three attacks that you believe to be the greatest security threat, rank what you believe to be the top three greatest security threats (e.g., cookie/session poisoning, platform exploits, etc.), discuss the appropriate countermeasures that security personnel could utilize in order to minimize the damage of such threats. Determine whether or not the countermeasures that you have ranked are reactive or proactive in nature, and suggest the primary ways in which each countermeasure could assist in preventing further damage from the threats in question. Explain whether or not honeypots would assist in protecting and evaluating the three threats selected. Provide a rationale for your response. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight. ==============================================

SEC 435 Week 2 Lab Hacking Webservers

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com


Lab Assignment 2 Due Week 2 and worth 40 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 2 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures: Web Applications and Data Servers (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. Lab 1 (Exercise II): “Footprinting Webserver Using the httprecon Tool” Lab 2 (Exercise III): “Footprinting a Webserver Using ID Server” ==============================================

SEC 435 Week 3 Discussion Cracking

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "Cracking" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Based on the “What if” case in Chapter 4 from the Book: Web Applications and Data Servers discuss the ethical aspects of what Regi did, and the possible ramifications of his actions. • Based on the “What if” case in Chapter 5 from the Book: Web Applications and Data Servers discuss the ethics of whether the


company had an obligation to report or not, and why? What would you have done and why? • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight.

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 3 Lab Hacking Web Applications

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Lab Assignment 3 Due Week 3 and worth 40 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 3 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures: Web Applications and Data Servers (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. Lab 3 (Exercise I): “Exploiting Parameter Tampering and XSS Vulnerabilities in Web Applications” Lab 4 (Exercise VII): “Website Vulnerability Scanning Using Acunetix WVS”


==============================================

SEC 435 Week 4 Discussion SQL Injection Attacks and Preventions

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "SQL Injection Attacks and Preventions" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Read Sammut, T., & Schiffman, M. (2013, April 5). Understanding SQL Injection. Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/sql_injection.ht ml. Read Wichers, D., Manico, J., & Seil, M. (2014, April 12). SQL Injection Prevention Cheat Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.owasp.org/index.php/SQL_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_ Sheet. Describe the major concerns that information security professionals and SQL database administrators should have with SQL injection attacks. Additionally, provide the key reasons why you believe such attacks are popular among hackers, both malicious and ethical. Justify your response. • Suggest what you believe to be the two most critical best practices for protecting against SQL injection attacks, and establish whether or not you believe that there are significant efforts for security


professionals who implement these best practices. Provide a rationale for your response. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight.

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 4 Lab SQL Injection

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Lab Assignment 4 Due Week 4 and worth 30 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 4 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Ethical Hacking and Countermeasures: Web Applications and Data Servers (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. Lab 1 (Exercise I): “SQL Injection Attacks on MS SQL Database”

==============================================


SEC 435 Week 5 Discussion Case Study

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Case Study" Have an original post of no less than three or four paragraphs, and offer advice of a paragraph or two to at least one other student. This is the proposal for your term paper due in week 9. Papers should not be written in a one week or weekend, but should take some time to research, consider, and then draft. Once drafted, ideally, one sleeps on the paper, so one can proof and revise one last time before submitting the final draft. I expect a 400 level paper, so give some thought to your case study and provide me a short synopsis of what you hope to look at, why, and what you hope to learn or accomplish. • Research the web and find an appropriate incident related to either a successful or failed penetration testing effort, or a successful or unsuccessful hacking attempt against an organization, business or government facility. For the discussion lay out the basic details of the case, why you chose this case, and speculate on what specific lessons you learned from the case, as well as possible recommendations for future situations. This proposal should be no less than three or four paragraphs.

==============================================


SEC 435 Week 6 Discussion Macs and Viruses

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "Macs and Viruses" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • A common misconception with Mac OS X systems is that they are not as susceptible to viruses and malware as PCs and therefore do not require users to apply additional security measures. Discuss whether or not you believe this is true. Provide a rationale for your response. • Review current Mac security features from Apple’s website located at http://www.apple.com/macos/security, and read the article 10 Best Antivirus for the Mac at http://techtop100.com/9-best-antivirus-formac-do-macs-need-antivirus-best-free-mac-antivirus. Select two tools, and research their features, functionality, provided protections, mitigated risks, costs, and any other pertinent information. Evaluate the quality of at least two of the selected Mac security tools, based on their available features, functionality, provided protections, mitigated risks, costs, and any other pertinent information discovered in your research. Decide whether or not you would recommend either of the tools for a Mac user. Justify your response. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight. ==============================================


SEC 435 Week 6 Lab Assignment 5 Hacking Wireless Networks

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Lab Assignment 5 Due Week 6 and worth 30 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 5 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Secure Network Operating Systems and Infrastructures. (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.

Lab 1 (Exercise I): “Cracking a WEP Network with Aircrack-ng for Windows.”

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 7 Discussion Mobile Malware

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT


www.sec435rank.com "Mobile Malware" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Determine whether or not you believe both that mobile malware is the new frontier for virus makers and hackers and whether or not mobile device security concerns will surpass those of standard computing devices over the next five years (e.g., desktops, servers, etc.). Justify your response. • Analyze the mobile device OS that you believe is the easiest to hack. Additionally, explain the ineffective security features that are utilized by this specific mobile device OS, and indicate the key reasons why you believe the security feature is failing to provide better protection. Provide a rationale for your response. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight.

==============================================

SEC 435 Week 7 Lab Assignment 6 Hacking Mobile Platforms

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com


Lab Assignment 6 Due Week 7 and worth 30 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 6 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Secure Network Operating Systems and Infrastructures. (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.

Lab 1 (Exercise I): “Creating Binary Payloads using Kali Linux to Hack Android.” Lab 2 (Exercise I): “Harvesting Users’ Credentials Using Social Engineering Toolkit.” ==============================================

SEC 435 Week 8 Discussion What If

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "What If?" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph:


• Read the “What if” case in Chapter 3 from the Book: Secure Network Operating Systems and Infrastructures provide a brief summary and respond to the two questions that are asked. • Discuss any aspect of “honeypots” and share your views on the value of such honeypots for ethical hackers, or how as a security professional you can protect yourself against providing such honeypots for exploitation. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight ==============================================

SEC 435 Week 8 Lab Assignment 7 Evading IDS, Firewalls and Honeypots

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Lab Assignment 7 Due Week 8 and worth 30 points Complete the following EC-Council Labs. Note: Lab 7 contains deliverables that are partially derived from the following course required textbook: EC-Council Press. (2017). Secure Network Operating Systems and Infrastructures. (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.


Lab 1 (Exercise I): “Detecting Intrusions using Snort” ==============================================

SEC 435 Week 9 Discussion GET and POST

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Imagine that a systems administrator for a midsized company has recently noticed numerous odd characters in the log servers. Specifically, http “GET” and “POST” log entries within their externally facing IIS version 5 web server. Discuss the use of the “GET” and “POST” commands and decide whether or not there are concerns with their presence on the externally facing web server. Next, provide your analysis of the most damaging attack (i.e. XSS, SQL Injection, CSS, and Race conditions) against Internet Information Services (IIS). Support your rationale. • Describe the most prominent signs that a database attack has occurred. Suggest the main steps that one would take to recover from such an attack. Next, propose one strategy you would use to prevent such attacks. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight


==============================================

SEC 435 Week 10 Discussion Encryption in Organizations

FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.sec435rank.com "Encryption in Organizations" Select one of the following and discuss in no less than three paragraphs, and have at least one response to another student of at least one paragraph: • Suppose an executive-level manager asked you to explain the importance of encryption. Detail the key points that you would use to justify the importance of using encryption during the overall security posture analysis of the executive-level manager’s organization. • Research the web for examples of the manner in which security professionals could use encryption in organizations today (e.g., database encryption), describe at least two uses of encryption within organizations today that you found in your research. From the uses identified, indicate the information resource the encryption is designed to protect. Assess the importance of protecting such an information resource from a security perspective. • Any current topic or article related to penetration techniques. • The instructor insight.

==============================================


SEC 435 RANK Education for Service--sec435rank.com  
SEC 435 RANK Education for Service--sec435rank.com  
Advertisement