5
| October 16, 2013
LEGAL
Christie Bid to Delay Gay Marriages Rejected as High Court Takes Appeal New Jersey Supreme Court to hear arguments in January but no word on october 21 wedding start date BY ARTHUR S. LEONARD
M
ercer County Superior Court Judge Mary C. Jacobson has denied a motion by the State of New Jersey to stay her decision ordering the state to begin granting marriage licenses to same-sex couples on October 21. In an October 10 ruling, Jacobson found that none of the factors considered by New Jersey courts in deciding a motion for a stay were met and that the public interest w ould b e se r v e d by a l l o wi n g h e r decision to go into effect. In the wake of Jacobson’s ruling, Republican Governor Chris Christie asked the New Jersey Appellate Division to issue an emergency stay to allow his appeal of her original mar riage equality order to go forward before weddings begin. The day after Jacobson refused to stay her ruling, the State Supreme Court agreed to hear Christie’s appeal of the gay marriage ruling on an expedited basis, with oral arguments in January. That court also said it would consider the governor’s emergency stay request, though it did not immediately rule on that question. A September 27 ruling from Jacobson granted summary judgment on the claim that the state’s civil union law no longer afforded equal treatment to same-sex couples, if it ever had, since the federal government started to recognize same-sex marriages in the wake of Edie Windsor’s victory over the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) at the Supreme Court on June 26. After Jacobson’s ruling last month, Christie vowed to seek review directly in the New Jersey Supreme Court, and he asked the judge to stay her decision pending that appeal. In response, Jacobson explained that under New Jersey law a a stay of a trial court ruling is granted only if necessary to prevent irreparable harm, the party applying for the stay is asserting a settled legal claim and shows a reasonable probability of success in their appeal, and a balancing of the relative hardships imposed on the opposing parties concludes that greater harm would occur if a stay is not granted than if it is. Jacobson also noted that in a case where public policy is at issue, the court should consider whether granting a stay is in the public interest. Jacobson found that the state fell
short on all of these tests. New Jersey, she found, would not suffer irreparable harm if same-sex couples were allowed to marry while an appeal is pending. If the New Jersey Supreme Court were later to declare such marriages invalid, the state would have suffered no tangible harm at all. The state offered no New Jersey precedents to support its irreparable harm argument, instead citing cases from other jurisdictions, but Jacobson found them all unper suasive or distinguishable from the question she was considering. She also found that the state “has not shown that the underlying legal right it seeks to vindicate through its appeal is ‘settled.’” Indeed, in light of the DOMA ruling, Jacobson last month concluded that denying marriage to same-sex couples violates the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2006 ruling that same-sex couples are entitled to the same rights and benefits as differentsex couples enjoy through marriage. That ruling led to the enactment of the current civil union law. In terms of balancing relative hardships, Jacobson found that delaying the date when same-sex couples can marry imposes a hardship on them, but not delaying it imposes no tangible hardship on the state. Jacobson ran through a list of federal rights and benefits that would be unavailable to New Jersey civil union partners unless they could marry, concluding that “these inequalities violate the clear directive” of the 2006 ruling. “While the State argues that its sovereignty is somehow threatened,” by her order, Jacobson wrote, “because it is the federal government’s actions [in not recognizing civil unions like marriages] that harm Plaintiffs, it persists in denying its responsibility for the current predicament of New Jersey civil union couples.” She pointed out that the state has done nothing to persuade the federal government to recognize New Jersey civil unions, leaving the burden entirely on civil union partners to bring their own lawsuits against federal agencies. In her ruling last month, Jacobson noted that many federal agencies have already made clear that they will not recognize civil unions. “Plaintiffs would face an enormous litigation burden if they were required to challenge, on their own, every federal
c
NEW JERSEY, continued on p.14
HAUNTED LIVE PERFORMANCES BY
Friday November 1 • 9pm Performances by Taylor Dayne & Expose. Costume contests, prizes and lots more. (Note: Masks & costumes are prohibited on the gaming floor.)
$20 in advance • $25 at the door:
Order Tickets Today! rwnewyork.com
MINUTES AWAY! 110-00 Rockaway Blvd. Jamaica, NY 11420 rwnewyork.com • 1-888-888-8801 In Queens, near JFK Airport. Take Free shuttle at Jamaica/Sutphin Blvd
or Q37. LIRR
Must be 18 years of age or older to play New York Lottery Games. Please play responsibly.