Well, it IS Bangkok... Friday, May 27, 2011
â€˜Hangover IIâ€™ still hilarious, even with predictable plot
he gossip circulating the movie review blogosphere basically screams â€œThe Hangover Part IIâ€? is a carbon copy of its smashhit predecessor, â€œThe Hangover.â€? In all honesty, thatâ€™s a bit of an overstatement, but DOMINIC not by BAEZ much. At the Movies While the infamous Wolfpack is traversing both the stunningly lush scenery and the gritty underground of Thailand
instead of the glittering and glamourous Vegas, and the boys lose the brideâ€™s brother rather than the groom, it wouldnâ€™t be uncalled for to decry director Todd Phillips and his writers for rehashing (and therefore diminishing) the 2009 plot line, strippers and drugs included. The Phillips-directed sequel (he also directed the first movie) takes place several years after the Vegas â€œincident,â€? this time with Stu (Ed Helms, â€œCeder Rapidsâ€?) being the groom on deck. Thereâ€™s a difference, though: His fiancĂŠeâ€™s (Jamie Chung, â€œDragon Ball: Evolutionâ€?) parents want the wedding in Thailand. Her father, Fohn (Nirut Sirichanya) thinks Stu is a pansy and harasses him mercilessly. But his prodigy son, Teddy (Mason Lee) is apparently a Godsend. And of course, as the laws of sequels dictate, Teddy has to join the Wolfpack. That doesnâ€™t sit
Box Office Top 5
Pirates: On No. 1 Stranger Tides
No. 2 Bridesmaids
No. 3 Thor
No. 4 Fast Five
No. 5 Priest
## # ## ## # ## ## # ## ## # ## ## # ## EO score:
Rotten Tomatoes is a registered trademarks of Flixster, Inc.
â€œThe Hangover Part IIâ€?*
*See note at end of story for explanation.
AP photo by Warner Bros. Pictures, Melinda Sue Gordon
From left, Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis and Ed Helms are shown in a scene from â€œThe Hangover Part II.â€? well with Alan (Zack Galifianakis, the first â€œHangoverâ€?), who feels threatened and overprotective of his best friends. So, while at a bonfire with Phil (Bradley Cooper, â€œLimitlessâ€?), Doug (Justin Bartha, â€œNational Treasureâ€?), Stu and Teddy, he introduces some druglaced marshmallows to the situation. Cue the time-lapsed cutaway, and we find Phil, Stu and Alan bloodied and bruised in the depths of Bangkok squaller, without any memory of the preceding night. And as in the original, someone (in this case, Teddy) has gone missing. And so weâ€™ve come full-circle, with the boys frantically navigating the dangerous streets of Bangkok in search of the 16-year-old. As they search, all hell breaks loose, including running into an angry
crime boss (Paul Giamatti, â€œSidewaysâ€?), a gun-toting Russian mob, a Mike Tyson-inspired facial tattoo, a tranny hooker, a finger without a person attached to it and a drug-dealing monkey who has a penchant for masturbation. Oh, and Mr. Chow ... Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong, the first â€œHangoverâ€?) ... shows up as Alanâ€™s plus-one, blow and criminal record in tow. With so much going on, itâ€™s not surprising that the performances of Cooper, Helms and Galifianakis come across as underwhelming. Cooper, after nailing the party boy role in the first movie, does nothing more than stand around and look pretty this time. Helmsâ€™ character, however, goes through
some cringe-inducing misery in this version (not that pulling out his own tooth and marrying a table dancer arenâ€™t misery incarnate), and it seems the torment falls unfairly on him. Galifianakis, though, is still gut-wrenchingly funny. He provides the center in â€œPart II,â€? being both idiotic and touching in equal measures and again stealing the show. Still, itâ€™s not enough to add anything fresh, and isnâ€™t that the point of a sequel? Thatâ€™s not to say the sequel isnâ€™t incredibly hilarious and just as debauched as the original (even more so in certain situations), but the beauty of the â€œThe Hangoverâ€? was how original it was. It took the premise of a Ve-
gas bachelor party and applied Murphyâ€™s Law to it. It was unabashedly raunchy and debased, vulgar without once being apologetic, giving the middle finger to political correctness. It was, in short, amazing. However, the sequel merely took that concept and applied it to international waters. If viewed alone and in its entirety, â€œPart IIâ€? would be a comedy gold mine. But thatâ€™s neither realistic nor fair. â€œThe Hangoverâ€? came first, and it will be the reason why â€œPart IIâ€? will do so well at the box office. So, while smoking cigarettes with a drug-dealing monkey would leave you with an interesting story to tell at the reception, â€œThe Hangover Part II,â€? with all of its insanity and high-octane action, leaves you feeling as if youâ€™d seen this movie before, and just a bit disappointed. But no worries: The credits more than make up for it. Two stars out of five. [Note: While "Part II" itself would warrant a higher score, it's only fair to compare it to the original, up to which it doesn't quite stand. This isn't to say you shouldn't see it, but be prepared for a strong sense of dĂŠjĂ vu.] Dominic Baez is the copy editor/paginator for the East Oregonian. Follow his movie blog, Silver Screening, for the latest trailers, clips and extras at silverscreening.wordpress.com. 46564CM
Flag Exchange for Veterans and their Families McKay Creek Estates will be offering a free flag exchange for veterans or their families on
Tuesday, June 14, 2011 McKay Creek Estates will exchange old or worn flags for a new one*, and old flags will be processed properly * Supplies are limited. First 25 flages will be exchanged.
McKay Creek Estates 1601 Southgate Place â€˘ Pendleton â€˘ 541-276-1987
( " ," +)**
# %( &' (
$# $ " " ! ( &
Contact the board at: http://www.bluecc.edu/board_email
JUST JUST 4 45 5 MINUTES MINUTES T TO O T THE HE B BEST EST D DEAL! EAL! 45089CM
LEGACY FORD OF LAGRANDE
Home of $700 Less!
541-963-2161 â€˘ www.LegacyDirect.com â€˘ 1-800-966-1707