DOMAIN
CITY HALL PARK SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
February 2014, DOMAIN was asked to submit a Vision Document for the Development of the Campo Area in the São Paulo Municipality, São Bernardo do Campo..
The interests of the global capital and the local population are seen as mutually exclusive, however with its global attention and massive investment for the two upcoming mega events coupled with a roaring economy, São Paolo is at a strategic moment to seize the situation and envision a millennium upgrade of its urban infrastructure.
2009
The Economist issue on Brazil (November 2009). A 14-page special report on Latin America’s big success story.
2010
The president of Russia Dmitry Medvedev, President Lula, President of China Hu Jintao and Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh pose for the official photo during the 2nd BRIC Summit in 2010 in Brasilia.
2014
Sepp Blatter, president of FIFA, officially announcing Brazil as the host nation of FIFA World Cup 2014.
2016
International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Jacques Rogge announces Rio de Janeiro as the winning city bid for the 2016 Olympic Games during the 121st IOC session in Copenhagen October 2, 2009.
Despite Brazil’s Rise as Global Economic & Political power, it is struggling with issues more common of non-developed countries: mobility; lack of public amenities, and liveability...in order for Brazil to achieve is stated ambition and potential, it must address the primary needs of its people...
LIVEABILITY
MOBILITY
ACCESSIBILITY
The ambition of City Hall Park is to provide a strategy for local development, which will simultaneously address both public and private interests, not as opposites but as mutually beneficial. Via a regional & metropolitan framework to decentralize the São Paulo, vise via multiple centralities, São Bernardo Do Campo, will transform itself into the recreation and leisure heart of the São Paulo metropolitan region.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
05
APPROACH
27
STRATEGY
55
TECHNICAL
139
APPENDIX
XXI
CREDITS
183
APPROACH
CITY HALL PARK
28
SÃO PAULO
29
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
30
SÃO PAULO TAKES OVER
BRAZIL
SÃO PAULO STATE
-
SÃO PAULO METROPOLITAN REGION
-
56% of SPMR population 44% of SPMR GDP MUNICIPALITY OF SÃO PAULO
31
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SÃO PAULO METROPOLITAN REGION
SÃO PAULO
GUARULHOS
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
OSASCO
SANTO ANDRÉ
56.09%
6.50%
4.08%
3.62%
3.42%
Population 2010
11.038.000
1.279.000
803.000
713.000
672.000
GDP per capita
39.450
30.383
46.495
54.599
25.609
(+/-) %
+0.30
0.00
+0.54
+0.81
-0.15
35.56%
2.98%
2.85%
2.92%
1.38%
443.600.102
37.139.404
35.578.586
36.389.080
17.258.468
%
% GDP
CITY HALL PARK
32
MAUÁ
DIADEMA
CARAPICUÍBA
MOGI DAS CRUZES
ITAQUAQUECETUBA
2.10%
2.00%
1.98%
1.89%
1.78%
413.000
394.000
389.000
371.000
351.000
17.619 -0.42%
29.153
9.270
22.751
10.118
-0.04%
-0.69%
-0.25%
-0.67%
0.90%
0.27%
0.71%
0.26%
11.254.523
3.429.411
8.810.329
3.256.578
0.59% 7.352.093
33
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
field e be
rno,
ute,
ansouth seceinonal e, fistra-
(MASP) is a politically recognized planning and administrative unit. It is the largest of 25 official Metropolitan Regions in Brazil. The MASP comprises 39 municipalities, with a total area of 8,051 km². The build-up area covers 2,139 km², stretching approximately 70-80 km in the East-West Axis and 50 km in the North-South axis.
Roberto ROCCO
Towards a polycentric metropolis Global strategies and unequal development in São Paulo
ang-173-216.qxd ang-173-216.qxd 17/12/2007 17/12/2007 08:17 08:17 Page 195 195 throughout the The population density is not Page homogenous
1. Introduction This paper aims at describing current trends in urban transformation in São Paulo, the largest metropolis in South America. It presents evidence on the role of the public sector in promoting infrastructural adjustments in order to reinforce the role of the agglomeration as articulator of national and global flows of production, information, knowledge, finance and services. It introduces evidence that such strategies reinforce polycentricity, but also socio-spatial fragmentation, through selective investment in infrastructure in specific areas of the metropolis. Our hypothesis is that, from a purely neo-classic economic point of view, global cities do not need to have homogenous development and equal access to urban networks and public services in order to promote economic growth. Economic growth is understood here as firms’ increasing returns, therefore economic growth and social development are not necessarily synonyms. Economies of agglomeration can thrive in highly fragmented spaces. Moreover, differences in the provision and accessibility to services do not necessarily interfere in the role of cities as articulators of production vol. 17, No. 1–2/06 and consumption. An »archipelago« of highly developed centralities highly connected between themselves and between other »global places« may trigger economic growth, but might not bring comprehensive development. Moreover, differences in the provision of services and infrastructure may work as propellers of real estate appreciation, as comparative advantages are excessively concentrated in specific sites, creating areas highly prized by certain economic agents and maximizing returns in real estate development, reinforcing existing polycentric structures.
metropolis, but the average is 2,631 inhabitants/ km2. The core municipality (São Paulo) has a density of approximately 7,171 inhabitants/ km2. The MASP is indisputably the financial and economic core of Brazil. The region’s GDP is approximately 45% that of the federal state and 15% of that of the country (IBGE, 2005). The The forgotten forgotten of cities cities The region is homemodernism tomodernism one of the of most diversified industrial complexes in Latin America. The high level of articulation between various industrial sectors and the highly advanced services sector is evident, especially in the automobile inresidential residential structure structure at at aindustrial more a more local local level, level, resulting in in a a dustry. The most important sectors areresulting chemicals, complex complex pattern pattern of overlapping of overlapping residential, residential, service service and and inautomobiles, food and drink industry, heavy machinery, industrial dustrial zones. zones. and plastics. publishing, electrics The service sector employs 51% of the working force, that What makes makes São Paulo Paulo a distinctive a distinctive case case is the is the logic logic ocof ocis,What more than 2São million workers. The main branches in of the cupation cupation of land, of land, dominated dominated by by three three processes: processes: 1. punctual 1. punctual service sector are telecommunications, technical producer planned planned intervention, intervention, 2. unplanned 2.services unplanned occupation occupation and 3. land 3. land services, informatics, postal and general and producer speculation. speculation. Public Public investment investment in roads in roads and and freeways, freeways, lar-larservices. São Paulo is also an international hub for advertigely gely based based on on thethe model model adopted adopted by by Robert Robert Moses Moses in New in New sing and marketing. Commercial activities employ more York York and and »transplanted« »transplanted« to to São São Paulo Paulo (Caro, (Caro, 1975), 1975), hashas than 1 million workers and generate 8.8% of aggregate vabeen been much much concentrated concentrated in the in the South-western South-western sector sector of the of the lue in the state. Large shopping centres are a common feacity. city. This This is a is result a result of the of the concentration concentration of public of public and and privature in many municipalities of the MASP. The city of Sãoprivate investments tealone investments in that area, area, following following a historic a historic trend trend for for thethe Paulo has in 41that large shopping malls that employ more dislocation dislocation of thethe wealthy wealthy sectors sectors of of society society towards towards thethe than 100.000 of persons (ABRASCE, 2006). west, west, whereas whereas industrial industrial activities activities occupied occupied the the eastern eastern The MASP has one of the most comprehensive transportasector sector of the ofinthe city, along along thethe train train lines. lines. This This trend created created tion systems allcity, Latin America. The region istrend connected an an »island »island of richness« of richness« in the in the south-western south-western part part of the of the city,city, to the seaside and to the vast South-American hinterland amidst amidst a »sea a »sea of poverty«, of poverty«, mostly mostly concentrated concentrated in the in the ea-eaby numerous highways and train lines (for commodities onstern and and southern southern sectors sectors (Meyer (Meyer et al., et al., 2004). 2004). ly)stern and is served by three large airports.
São Paulo is also an international hub for advertising and marketing.
In the In the beginning beginning of the of the 21st 21st century, century, continuous continuous urban urban de-development velopment occupies occupies thethe best best part part of of thethe municipality municipality and 193 and overspills overspills to the to the contiguous contiguous municipalities, municipalities, forming forming a dense a dense andand extensive extensive urban urban mass. mass. Radial Radial or or multiple-nuclei multiple-nuclei devedevelopment lopment models models areare no no longer longer enough enough to explain to explain thethe comcomplex plex urban urban structure structure resulting resulting from from thatthat process. process. In the In the case case of São of São Paulo, Paulo, thethe sheer sheer size size of the of the metropolis metropolis made made thethe development development of multiple of multiple service service andand employment employment centres centres clearly clearly indispensable. indispensable. This This resulted resulted firstfirst in the in the de-decentralisation centralisation outout of the of the Central Central Business Business District District andand later later in the in the development development of multiple of multiple centres centres of service, of service, consumpconsumptiontion andand work, work, while while thethe oldold urban urban core core was was drained drained from from much much of its of its former former economic economic vitality. vitality. This This process process was was coucoupled pled with with thethe absorption absorption of smaller of smaller municipalities municipalities andand thethe incorporation incorporation of their of their centres centres as as services services andand commercial commercial subsub centres centres in São in São Paulo. Paulo.
Paulo Paulo stillstill passes passes through through São São P riesries andand thethe port port of Santos, of Santos, butb gerger thethe most most dynamic dynamic sector sector of to Although Although networks networks areare geograph geogra cially cially produced produced andand historically historica notnot static, static, they they areare constantly constantly chac figurations figurations based based on on these these netw n ging. ging. At At thethe intra-urban intra-urban level, level, thet ration ration made made thethe existence existence of eve of e andand spatial spatial networks networks necessary. necessa rolerole of of São São Paulo Paulo at at thethe head heao system system hashas remained remained unaltered unalter thethe beginning beginning of the of the XXXX century, centu a first a first wave wave of industrialisation, of industrialisatiot of capitals of capitals issued issued from from coffee coffee pla At At thethe inter-urban inter-urban level, level, wewe canc tiontion of a ofhierarchical a hierarchical urban urban syst sy vast vast Brazilian Brazilian territory. territory. At At thethe intra-urban intra-urban level, level, extended exten nised, nised, promoting promoting thethe appearance appeara thethe emergence emergence of »main of »main nodes« node render render thethe networks networks reasonably reasonab over over an an extended extended territory. territory. One O cess cess is the is the existence existence of various of varioub of the of the municipality. municipality. Apart Apart from from th minals, minals, thethe citycity hashas 24 24 large large loca l connected connected to to train train stations stations anda These These busbus terminals terminals attempt attempt to tensive tensive network network of 990 of 990 local local busb lionlion passengers passengers perper year year (SPTra (SPT
The MASP is indisputably the financial and economic core The distinction between growth and development is impor- of Brazil. The region’s GDP isAnother Another sign sign of of thethe necessary necessa tant in order to analyse public policies that allegedly promoandand polycentric polycentric spatial spatial organiza organ te both, while in reality stressing only the former. forms of governance of governance andand politic pol approximately 45% that of theforms urbanised urbanised territory. territory. federal state and 15% of that In the In the core core municipality, municipality, »sub-m »sub 2. The economic core of Brazil »regional administrations« administrations« in the in The development development of São of São Paulo Paulo as as a polycentric a polycentric metropolis metropolis »regional ofThe the country (IBGE, 2005). in face in face of the of the necessity necessity to d t corresponds corresponds to the to the »centrifugal »centrifugal mode« mode« described described by by ChamCham- nedned São Paulo is a metropolis of superlatives. It is the largest Networks ar king. Sub-municipalities Sub-municipalities were were in pion pion (2001) (2001) andand used used by by Lambregts Lambregts (2006). (2006). It later It later includes includes king. urban agglomeration in South America, with roughly 18 mildent administrative administrative units; units; they they en features features from from thethe »incorporation »incorporation model«, model«, with with thethe absorpabsorp- dent lion inhabitants (IBGE, Brazilian Institute of Geography and pendence pendence in deciding in deciding where where to p t tiontion of middle of middle andand small small sized sized cities cities intointo thethe urban urban mass. mass. are constan Statistics, 2005). According to Habitat-UN, it is one of the frastructure frastructure andand services. services. They Thea largest urban agglomerations in the world, after Tokyo, Melating »local »local master master plans«, plans«, whic w In fact, In fact, thethe Greater Greater São São Paulo Paulo Metropolitan Metropolitan Area Area is characis charac- lating new spatial xico City and New York (UN, 2006) development development strategies, strategies, com c terised terised by by thethe exacerbated exacerbated growth growth of one of one single single municipamunicipa- calcal plan plan of the of the core core municipality municipa litylity (São (São Paulo) Paulo) between between thethe second second halfhalf of the of the XIXXIX century century sterster The »Grande São Paulo« (Greater São Paulo Area) is a based th by by thethe mayor mayor ofon of São São Paulo Pau andand thethe lastlast decades decades of the of the XXXX century, century, followed followed by by thethe de-de- tedted large metropolitan region located in the Brazilian federal going debate debate about about whether whether the centralisation centralisation of industrial of industrial activity activity in the in the second second halfhalf of the of the going state of São Paulo. The Metropolitan Area of São Paulo constantly e sub-municipality master master plans plans we XXXX century century andand a dramatic a dramatic decrease decrease of population of population growth growth sub-municipality The MASP, far from being a (MASP) is a politically recognized planning and administrain the in the core core municipality. municipality. The The latter latter managed managed meanwhile meanwhile to to tive unit. It is the largest of 25 official Metropolitan Regions However, sub-municipalities sub-municipalities arearv keep keep control control over over productive productive processes processes throughout throughout thethe BraBra- However, agglomeration, inhomogeneous Brazil. The MASP comprises 39 municipalities, with a tovisions, visions, comprising comprising from from 250,00 250 zilian zilian territory. territory. tal area of 8,051 km². The build-up area covers 2,139 km², which makes makes it necessary it necessary to su to This This process process is related is related to the to the role role of the of the citycity as as thethe place place which is a approximately collection very different stretching 70-80 kmof in the East-West Axis 96 96 districts, districts, sometimes sometimes w where where various various kinds kinds of of networks networks have have been been articulated articulated intointo and 50 km in the North-South axis. 200.000 inhabitants. inhabitants. Urban Urban plann pl through through 450450 years years of history. of history. NotNot merely merely transportation transportation andand 200.000 municipalities, concerning their tootoo large large andand a legal a legal definiti defi communication communication networks networks areare important important here here (the (the city’s city’s firstfirst stillstill The population density is not homogenous throughout the ve ve units units has has been been sought. sought. function), function), butbut also also business business andand service service networks. networks. ParticuParticumetropolis, but the average is 2,631 inhabitants/ km2. The lar lar geographical, geographical, social social andand political political factors factors allowed allowed agents agents extension, population, level of core municipality (São Paulo) has a density of approximaoperating operating in São in São Paulo Paulo to keep to keep a quasi a quasi monopoly monopoly of certain of certain tely 7,171 inhabitants/ km . networks at different at different times times in history in history (e.g. (e.g. coffee coffee exports exports or or development and economic networks The Consolidation Consolidatio automobile automobile production). production). Through Through time, time, agents agents controlling controlling 4. 4.The The MASP is indisputably the financial and economic core certain certain networks networks slowly slowly abandoned abandoned their their monopoly monopoly in order in order ofof aa New New Corporate Corpora ofactivities. Brazil. The region’s GDP is approximately 45% that of to assume to assume new new roles roles or or added added more more dynamic dynamic activities activities to to 2
the federal state and 15% of that of the country (IBGE, 2005). The region is home to one of the most diversified industrial complexes in Latin America. The high level of articulation between various industrial sectors and the highly advanced services sector is evident, especially in the automobile industry. The most important industrial sectors are chemicals, automobiles, food and drink industry, heavy machinery, publishing, electrics and plastics. The service sector employs 51% of the working force, that
thethe existing existing ones, ones, changing changing thethe configuration configuration of networks of networks operating operating in the in the citycity (e.g. (e.g. coffee coffee exports exports areare stillstill largely largely mamanaged naged from from thethe São São Paulo Paulo Commodities Commodities Stock Stock Exchange Exchange andand a large a large part part of the of the coffee coffee production production of the of the State State of São of São
The The existence existence of of a polycentric a polycentr complex complex scenario scenario for for thethe develop deve According According to the to the Bolsa Bolsa de de Imóve Imó lo Real lo Real Estate Estate Stock Stock Exchange Exchan
CITY HALL PARK
34
ang-173-216.qxd
vol. 17, No. 1–2/06
o Paulo before reaching factobut coffee exports are no lonof the economy). aphically defined, they are soally determined. Networks are changing and new spatial connetworks are constantly emerthe sheer size of the agglomeever more extended functional ary. At the inter-urban level, the ad of the Brazilian productive ed since it was established at ury, when the city experienced on, thanks to the accumulation plantations in its hinterland. can also observe the constituystem with main nodes in the
nded networks had to be orgaance of a nodal hierarchy, with es«. This happened in order to bly manageable and functional One good example of this prous bus terminals in many parts m three large intercity bus terlocal bus terminals, very often and the underground system. to articulate an incredibly exbus lines that transport 2.5 bilTrans, 2006).
ary development of hierarchic nization is to be found in new litical organisation of the vast
b-municipalities« replaced city the early 2000’s. This happeto de-centralise decision mae introduced as semi-indepeny enjoy a high degree of indeto place investment in local iney are also in charge of formuwhich are meant at guiding loomplementing the overall maality. »Sub-mayors« are indicaulo (although there is an onthey should be elected). The s were approved in 2004.
17/12/2007
08:17
Page 197
The forgotten modernism of cities
vol. 17, No. 1–2/06
velop their »comparative advantages« and create conditions for agglomeration and the constitution of »clusters« of innovation and productivity. The »comparative advantage« concept was first pointed out and largely publicised by Porter (Porter, 2000) at the Harvard Business School, among others. It was first understood as a corporate management tool, but was quickly incorporated by city planners and urban managers as an important tool for the adjustment of cities to an emerging economic scenario of simultaneously dispersed production and concentrated command. One of the most powerful notions in regional economics and economic geography is the notion of »agglomeration economies« (Moulaert and Gallouj, 1993: 91). Agglomeration economies are basically economies that are dependent on the spatial proximity of economic activity (Parr, 2002:153). Pol~se (2005:1432), defines agglomeration economies as »the productivity gains derived from the geographical clustering of firms and people«.
Faria Lima Avenue (area 4). This kind of large infrastructural intervention is made in order to provide places where business can agglomerate, but the preponderant factor seems to be concentrated and controlled real estate appreciation. This exaggerated concentration of resources increases returns for landowners, investors, developers and clients, while other sectors of the metropolis are not optimally occupied or developed, emphasizing spatial and social fragmentation.
faster accomplishment of agreements between sellers and buyers, according to the theory that face-to-face interactions (Storper and Venables, 2003). In his definition of »innovation clusters«, Porter also includes universities, quality control agencies, »think tanks«, professional training associations and commercial associations. Those institutions ought to produce specialised training, education, information, research and technical support, allowing for greater speed and efficiency in synergies between economic agents.
compete for relatively few spots, inflating the price of real estate in a very uneven form.
the global level must be able to compete between themselves. From this point of view, São Paulo can be understood as the place where networks operating in a large area of the South American continent are articulated and managed, in competition with large metropolises that offer similar comparative advantages AND which operate over a similar geographical base: Buenos Aires and Santiago of Chile. The greatest advantage of São Paulo, which cannot be overcome by the other two South American global cities, is the articulation of networks and links in the huge Brazilian market, over which São Paulo reigns.
Roberto Rocco, architect, TU Delft, Bouwkunde, Department of Urbanism, Chair of Urban Renewal and Strategy E-mail: rocco@bk.tudelft.nl
6. Conclusion
Heavy public investment has been allocated to certain arThe greatest advantage of São eas of the metropolis, leaving other parts of the metropolis without poor or any investment. This created marked imbaPaulo, which cannot be overcome lance in the provision of services and urban technical networks, which did not affect the role of São Paulo as the head of the Brazilian productive system and the main South byIn short, theit isother American believed thattwo clusters South of competitiveness and American »global city«. From the standpoint of productivity innovation can generate the necessary impulse for the inand competitiveness, the metropolis does not »need« to be global cities, is the articulation crease of economical dynamics, thus producing a benefisocially or spatially homogeneous, as »agglomeration ecocial impact for the society »as a whole«. nomies« can take place in an archipelago-like configuration. ofFornetworks and links in the huge The metropolis becomes in effect increasingly heterogeneLevy (1999), in order for this to happen, there must be ous and discontinuous, both spatially and socially. Heterosynergies between a large number of activities, which Brazilian market, over which São geneity in the form of deep unevenness in the distribution should be physically close to each other, allowing the perof urban services, infrastructure and accessibility is a tool manent exchange of knowledge and information and allofor land and real estate appreciation, because comparative Paulo reigns. wing for the emergence of innovation. Proximity also allows advantages are made scarce and economic agents have to
This is consistent with Robert Kurtz’s theories on the »archipelago« of developed areas within a territory, not necessarily interconnected, and not necessarily spreading wealth through the whole.
processes described are questionable in thethe light of SãoThePaulo as the head of the analyses of social patterns in the metropolitan territory. re not static, theyThis combination of factors, according to Levy (1999), Brazilian exEconomic andproductive social sustainability become central themes system plains the »renaissance« of many global metropolises. Glofor further and equitable growth. Third World Metropolises cities presumably accommodate networks that help gently changing andbal change to remain competitive in the global arena, but andmust the main South American nerate creativity and innovation. Such networks would allow they have to do so combining the »adaptation« of their sparecombination and change, following the essential structures and the solution of their own internal probconfigurations permanent tial need for flexibility in today’s economical order. “global city”contradictions. As the case of São Paulems and inherited lo suggests, these contradictions are paradoxically intensihese networks areSuch line of thought has been appropriated by urban plan- fied by the effort of adaptation to the new global scenario. ners and local governments, in the form of strategic plans, emerging. nourishing the idea that cities whose networks operate at
re very large administrative di0,000 to 500,000 inhabitants, o subdivide them even further s with more than 100.000 to lanners claim that districts are inition for smaller administrati-
on ate Axis
ric structure has produced a elopment of business clusters. óveis de São Paulo (São Paunge), São Paulo currently has
Urban transformation following the appearance of flexible capitalism and globalisation is irrevocably attached, in the Brazilian case, to the penetration of transnational corporations and the response given by local administrations to their structural requirements. This response has often translated itself in the form of Large Urban Projects, such as
195 35
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Figures Figure 1: São Paulo in relation to other South American metropolises. Map by R. Rocco. Data sources: NASA 2002, UN Habitat 2006, IBGE 2006. Figure 2: The Metropolitan Area of São Paulo and its political components (2004). The municipality of São Paulo (highlighted) is the largest one and where urbanisation is more intense. Large urbanised areas are also to be found in the northeast of the main municipality (Guarulhos) and the southeast (the ABC cities, where the automobile and chemical industry have agglomerated. Map: Roberto Rocco. Satellite photo source: NASA (2004)
197
OSASCO
SÃO PAULO
DIADEMA
CITY HALL PARK
36
GRU GUARULHOS
NETWORKS ARE NOT STATIC, THEY ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING AND NEW SPATIAL CONFIGURATIONS BASED ON THESE NETWORKS ARE CONSTANTLY EMERGING.
SANTO ANDRÉ MAUÁ
HOSPITAL
SÃO BERNARDO
MARKET HOTEL SCHOOL LIBRARY THEATRE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM
37
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY CLUSTERS
FRANCISCO MORATO SANTA ISABEL FRANCO DA ROCHA
MAIRIPORÃ
CAJAMAR CAIEIRAS
PIRAPORA DO BOM JESUS
ARUJÁ GUARULHOS
SANTANA DE PARNAÍBA
GUARAREMA
ITAQUAQUECETUBA
BARUERI OSASCO ITAPEVI
POÁ
JANDIRA CARAPICUÍBA
VARGEM GRANDE PAULISTA
TABOÃO DA SERRA
FERRAZ DE VASCONCELOS
SÃO PAULO
SUZANO BIRITIBA-MIRIM
SÃO CAETANO DO SUL
EMBU
MAUÁ DIADEMA
COTIA
SALESÓPOLIS
MOGI DAS CRUZES
RIBEIRÃO PIRES RIO GRANDE DA SERRA
ITAPECERICA DA SERRA SANTO ANDRÉ SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SÃO LOURENÇO DA SERRA
EMBU-GUAÇU
JUQUITIBA
SITE OF INTERVENTION
CITY HALL PARK
38
OSASCO
Osasco
Population:
666,740
Density: GDP:
10,264 ppl/km 58,822 R$ per capita 39,283,027 thousand R$ total 0.002% 7.8% 70.7%
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
Main service:
158,089,068 R$ 18,700 companies active Banks
GUARULHOS
Guarulhos
Population:
1,299,249
Density: GDP:
3,834 ppl/km 35,248 R$/capita 43,476,753 thousand R$ total 0.01% 24.6% 56.3%
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
Main service:
339,117,825 R$ 31,826 companies active Airport
SÃO PAULO
Sao Paulo
Population:
11,253,503
Density: GDP:
7,398 ppl/km 42,152R$ per capita 477,005,597 thousand R$ total 0.004% 16.1% 64.9%
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
Main service:
1,984,858,284 R$ 554,344 companies active Metropolitan center
SANTO ANDRÉ Population:
676,407
Density: GDP:
3,848 ppl/km 26,035 R$/capita 17,644,718 thousand R$ total 0.007% 26.3% 59.9%
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
ABC Region
Main service:
Population:
406,718
Density: GDP:
12,536 ppl/km 30,332 R$/capita 11,786,624 thousand R$ total 0.001% 38.6% 45.5%
Agriculture: Industries: Services:
108,657,946 R$ 26,000 companies active
Public investments:
Church administration
Main service:
MAUÁ
35,107,598 R$ 9,945 companies active Industries
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Population:
444,136
Population:
805,895
Density: GDP:
6,741 ppl/km 18,124 R$/capita 7,633,782 thousand R$ total 0.001% 33.3% 52.2%
Density: GDP:
1.869 ppl/km 47,175 R$/capita 36,337,338 thousand R$ total 0.001% 33% 45.1%
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
Main service:
39
DIADEMA
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
40,006,680 R$ 7,110 companies active Industries
Agriculture: Industries: Services: Public investments:
Main service:
160,122,386 R$ 27,619 companies active Industries
OSASCO University City
STRATEGIC PLAN
SÃ T
ABC Region
São Bernardo do Campo
new regional center
Universities and libraries Automotive companies (industries and headquarters) Libraries Airports Existing motorways Proposed connections - public transport
DYNAMIC CLUSTERS
METROPOLITAN REGION CAMPINAS SÃO JOSÉ DOS CAMPOS
PORT SANTOS
CONNECTIONS CITY HALL PARK
40
OSASCO University City GUARULHOS Airport City
SÃO PAULO The City
ABC Region
São Bernardo do Campo
new regional center
EXISTING METRO NETWORK
OSASCO University City GUARULHOS Airport City
SÃO PAULO The City
ABC Region
São Bernardo do Campo
new regional center
PROPOSED METRO NETWORK 41
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
A POLYCENTRIC METROPOLITAN AREA
SÃO PAULO The City
OSASCO University City
Adm center I
Extension of the São Paulo University Investments in temporary housing Real estate New scientific center heath and culture Promote mobility international students
business
Commercial a Touristic Dest circulation of
Financial
Service-orie
Adminis
DENSIFYING THE EXISTING CITY HUBS, ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DENSITY & PROVIDE EACH CENTRALITY, WITH A UNIQUE BRAND CITY HALL PARK
42
New Terminals Train service development linking Rio de Janeiro-Galeão A and Campinas-Viracopos airports Air
cargo logistics
GUARULHOS Airport City
Free trade zone Multi-modal
transport hub Cargo
Technological park/innovative
businesses
ministrative
International s Headquarters
and Residential Core tination Innovation/ knowledge
l institutions
ented economy
strative center
Automotive Industries Technological
esearch headquarters
New airport of SPRM Inter-modal terminal
Logistics Center
International business hub Automotive Industries Technological research headquarters New airport of Sao
ABC REGION
Paolo Metropolitan Region
São Bernardo new regional center
terminal
Intermodal
Logistics Center
International business hub
43
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
FERRAZOPOLIS
AVENIDA B.FARIA LIMA
RUA M.DEODORO
CITY HALL PARK
44
ANCHIETA MOTORWAY
RUA JURUBATUBA
45
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
STADIO 1o DE MAIO SÃO BERNARDO
RUA JURUBATUBA
CITY HALL PARK
46
SÃO PAULO
AVENIDA B.FARIA LIMA
47
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY MUSEUM
PARQUE CITTA DI MAROSTICA
CITY HALL PARK
48
FERRAZOPOLIS
RUA JURUBATUBA
49
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Historically perceived as the first Brazilian settlement built away from the sea and situated in Mountain Range of the Sea, of the Atlantic Plateau, City Park Hall occupies a position of strategic significance in the Metropolitan region of São Paulo. The planned intensification of transport through the site renders inevitable its emergence as a new center. The question is not whether City Hall Park will develop, but how? If successful, a new city center in São Bernardo could fulfill its ambitions and establish a node for interaction between potential centralities in the São Paulo metro region.
CITY HALL PARK
50
51
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
STRATEGY
SITE The existing use of the site consists primarily of infrastructure, transportation, and logistics. The operations of the neighborhoods and its related functions define the quality of much of the site. What if, rather than attempting to suppress or insulate these uses from new development, they are considered as latencies capable of forming the identity of a new site, perhaps even a new center? Can the introduction of new urban conditions benefit from and reinforce the existing conditions of the site?
CITY HALL PARK
56
57
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE RESTRICTIONS
MOBILITY NETWORK
CITY HALL PARK
58
GEOLOGICAL FORMATION
59
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE RESTRICTIONS
DISCONNECTED EDGES
CITY HALL PARK
60
grid inefficiency (enhances fragmentation) ARCHIPELAGO
61
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE RESTRICTIONS
GREEN SPACES
CITY HALL PARK
62
INFRASTRUCTURAL SPINE
63
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
GRID STUDIES
NEW YORK
BARCELONA
LONDON
TOKYO
CITY HALL PARK
64
PARIS
MOSCOW
SAN FRANCISCO
COPENHAGEN
Due to the sites unfortunate geological transformation, it is void of consistent spatial continuity, thus eliminating a singular or consistent framework to organize the area a as whole…
65
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE STRATEGY The design organizes the site into a series performative archipelagos, each dedicated to particular forms of leisure and performance. The irregular placement of the islands, are reinforced with Icons which seem to exist in a state of radical impermanence. The icons form a continuity of irregularity, each with different types of spaces and functions, each varying in terms of architectural typology, density, and landscape.
STEP 01: UNIFY
CITY HALL PARK
66
IN
4M
STEP 02: HUMANIZE
67
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE STRATEGY Adjacent to the Performative Landscape is the existing neighborhood. Whereas Islands & supporting Icons provide difference and diversity, the existing neighborhood provides cohesion and unity. The neighborhoods desire to cross over, mix, and occupy the performative landscape serves as proverbial glue for the site. By reorganizing the adjacent streets vehicular traffic to one-way flow, and consolidating infrastructure, transportation, and logistics to the center of the site, and beneath the proposed Metra line, the existing roads adjacent to the site are transformed into commercial boulevards. The site is no longer a residual geological junk space, but the the physical and programmatic center of the neighborhood.
W
E
STEP 03: POROSITY
CITY HALL PARK
68
STEP 04:
ENGAGEMENT 69
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE STRATEGY
CULTURE
RETAIL RETAIL LEISURE
LEISURE
RETAIL
CULTURE RETAIL
TRANSPORT RETAIL
LEISURE
RETAIL
CULTURE RETAIL
LEISURE
RETAIL
OFFICE RETAIL
OFFICE
HOTEL RETAIL
STEP 05: BRANDING
CITY HALL PARK
70
STEP 06: LANDSCAPE
71
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
POROSITY
WORKERS
CITY HALL PARK
74
RESIDENTS
75
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
POROSITY
VISITORS
CITY HALL PARK
76
ALL USERS
77
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
78
79
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
PROGRAM
LEISURE
1.2%
7,851 m2
TRANSPORT
6.1%
39,410 m2
HEALTHCARE
3.1%
19,858 m2
3,600 2,401 1,850
39,410
F
5,256 3,600 3,602 7,400
34,322
CULTURE
16.1%
103,441 m2
28,760 9,853 12,006 18,500 2,628
25,925
29,558
RETAIL
17.5%
112,739 m
2
E
36,018 9,250 9,360 19,705 18,009 18,500
HOTEL
18.9%
D
121,734 m2 65,520
10,512 28,800
C
48,024
OFFICE
36.8%
236,656 m2
37,000
B 112,320
A
PARKING
368,461 m2
The masterplan envisioned consists of six programmatic anchors: all dedicated to specific themes unique to San Bernardo: Creative Industries, Automotive Industry, Film, Technology, and Performance.
TOTAL:
1,010,149 m2
CITY HALL PARK
82
83
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
PROGRAM
DISTRIBUTION
OFFICE
HOTEL
CULTURE
LEISURE
CITY HALL PARK
84
85
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
RETAIL
HEALTHCARE
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
CITY HALL PARK
86
6.570 m2 Retail 2.628 Office 3.942
6.570 m2 Healthcare 5.256 Office 1.314
6.570 m2 Office 5.256 Culture 1.314
3.425 m2
33,008 m2
Culture 3.425
Culture 33.008
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
900 m2
900 m2
Retail 900
Culture 3.425
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
3.425 m2 Retail 3.425
3.425 m
2
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
Culture 3.425
900 m2
72.000 m2
Retail 900
Leisure 3.600 Healthcare 3.600 Culture 14.400 Retail 21.600 Office 28.800
98.525 m2 Transport 39.410 Culture 9.852 Retail 29.557 Hotel 19.705
120.060 m2 Leisure 2.401 Healthcare 3.601 Culture12.006 Retail 36.018 Hotel 18.009
92.500 m2
Office 48.024
Leisure 1.850 Healthcare 7.400 Culture 18.500 Retail 9.250 Hotel 18.500
187.200 m
2
Retail 9.436
Hotel 65.520
Office 112.320
87
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Office 37.00
CITY HALL PARK
88
The anchors are closely related through innovation and research, and provide the basis for strategic and economic cooperation for the metro region. In addition, four other primary types form the majority of the program: office, healthcare, retail, and hotel. The 10 program types are distributed in formations that overlap and weave tightly with each other to generate a rich and diverse mix. In this way, every programmatic typology finds it’s most appropriate location and retains an efficient coherence within the whole.
89
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
PERFORMANCE PLAZA
The form of the building is pragmatic response to the site conditions: the indoor theatre carves itself beneath the contours of the site, thus, the extruded parcel, forms into an amphitheater creating a signifier of performance. The retaining wall which support the amphitheater, as well as the functional spine for the indoor theatre, is simultaneously a digital theatre dedicated to performance: sports, theatre, music, etc. Thus the building and the entire plaza is a performance in and of itself.
6.570 m2 Retail 2.628 Office 3.942
6.570 m2 Healthcare 5.256 Office 1.314
6.570 m2 Office 5.256 Culture 1.314
33,008 m2 Culture 33.008
Peugeot Hospital São Bernardo
Shopping Metrópole
City Hall
Expo Center and Event Plaza
Parque Cittá Di Marostica New city museum M-12 Paco Municipal
91
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
92
93
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
MUSEUM PARK
We have achieved a balanced dichotomy by creating a connection of buildings to satisfy the institutional demands of the Film center; namely to produce, market, and celebrate the industry. In contrast but also in support of this structure, the landscape stands clear of regulation. It is here that we envision the natural, human, and organic moments, which truly create culture through conversation and interaction. The proximity of these spaces will bring each’s attention to the other, creating a tension but also perhaps a synergy. This tenuous relationship between the two spaces is necessary for a creative space. It is only through this stark contrast that something new may emerge, making the center a living space rather like a lab or a studio: a space whose purpose is flexible and can adapt to the needs of upcoming generations of young people, retaining its relevance and vitality to an audience who by nature reject the old and are quick to recognize the passé.
Film Studios
Association of Muslim Youth
New city museum M-12 Paco Municipal Stadio 1o de Maio SB
Exhibitions and Sports Centre
Recreation and Shopping
M-13 Djalma Dutra
95
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
96
97
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CREATIVE LABS
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
900 m2
Not solely a container for a lab, but a lab itself. Separating the functions into three slabs allows for maximum flexibility and change. However, the slabs are linked via shared program; thus the building can perform as one machine, without sacrificing the unique demands of each user. The laboratory fosters m2 extends itself to the practical a spirit of innovation900 that 3.425 functions of the programCulture it supports.
Retail 900
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
3.425 m2 Retail 3.425
3.425 m
2
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
Culture 3.425
900 m2 Retail 900
72.000 m2 Leisure 3.600 Healthcare 3.600 Culture 14.400 Retail 21.600 Office 28.800
Film Studios
Association of Muslim Youth
New city museum M-12 Paco Municipal Stadio 1o de Maio SB
Exhibitions and Sports Centre
Recreation and Shopping
M-13 Djalma Dutra
99
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
100
101
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY CENTER
98.525 m2 Transport 39.410 Culture 9.852 Retail 29.557
The City Centre serves as both the physical and programmatic centre of the immediate site and the City of SĂŁo Bernardo. The arrival plaza plaza for students, tourist, residence, workers, and officials and from the entire metropolitan region.
Hotel 19.705
Stadio 1o de Maio SB
Transportation Hub and Retail Park Antonio Anjoletto
Commercial zone-Furnitures
103
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
M-13 Djalma Dutra
Hospital do IMASF
CITY HALL PARK
104
105
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
INCUBATOR CITY
120.060 m2 Leisure 2.401 Healthcare 3.601 Culture12.006 Retail 36.018 Hotel 18.009 Office 48.024
Commercial zone-Furnitures Natinal Institute of Social Security
The intent of this project is to create an institutional building for a culture that thrives outside of the institution. Startup and Entrepreneurs, and in particular digital culture, has defined itself in contrast to the mainstream, to the staid expectations of each preceding generation. The Start-up has drawn the lines of battle with the trite, the expected and the known. Thus a paradox for us: how to create an infrastructure of support to satisfy the conflicting needs of the organization while serving a radical and emerging culture without stifling it or creating a box that inadequately represents the fluid needs of a culture which is by nature always in flux.
M-13 Djalma Dutra Catholic Church Santa Vitoria Eye clinic ABC
Retail, Leisure and Culture
107
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CONVENTION CENTER
92.500 m2 Leisure 1.850 Healthcare 7.400 Culture 18.500 Retail 9.250 Hotel 18.500 Office 37.00
The convention center is the ultimate autonomous object within the urban development: the building floats atop a pool of water, adjacent to the obvious Gateway Tower. The activities of the Convention Center, circulation, function, services, events, and density are hidden within a form which at once appears to be known, but is not. The entrance itself, is uncomfortably torn from the natural urban plane, to create an intimate threshold between the known and unknown; a gateway into an autonomous architectural heterotopia in constant levitation.
M-13 Djalma Dutra
Offices and Convention Center
Car related commerce
Twin Towers Shopping Catholic Church
Residential towers
M-14 Pça. Lauro Gomes
111
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
GATEWAY TOWER
187.200 m2 Retail 9.436
Hotel 65.520
Office 112.320
The position of the Gateway Tower is essentially a paradox: it is simultaneously a potential gateway as well the terminus to the urbanized areas of the São Paolo metropolitan area – due to this critical placement, the tower must signify both arrival & departure, thus clearly demarcating the urban from the rural…
M-13 Djalma Dutra
Twin Towers Shopping Mall
Headquarters, Hotels and Entertainment Residential towers
M-14 Pça. Lauro Gomes Public Market Lauro Gomes
115
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
116
117
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CITY HALL PARK
118
Taking the effects of dense planning into consideration it is critical to acknowledge. The World Health Organization’s suggestion of 16m2 of open space area per person. Sao Bernardo currently has an average of 12 m2 per person. The design creates a green oasis for the city to generate an unprecedented quality of life for future inhabitants and neighbours.
119
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
HARDSCAPE
Urban plaza Pavement Pavers CITY HALL PARK
122
INVENTORY
Rubber playground tiles
Concrete planks
Natural stone
Timber boarding
Rock
Seashell gravel
Rough soil
123
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Hard court sportfields
SOFTSCAPE
Water Green spine Grass
Paths Lush green Tropical forest Trees CITY HALL PARK
124
INVENTORY
Açaí palm
Anadenanthera colubrina
Calliandra tweediei
Schizolobium parahyba
Miltonia cuneata 125
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Erythrina falcata
Butia yatay
Vriesea carinata
Tibouchina semidecandra
Thelypteris
PERFORMATIVE LANDSCAPE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CITY HALL PARK
126
127
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
1. Amphitheatre
2. Urban Cinema
3. Tropical Forest
4. Lush Green Hills
5. Station Plaza
6. Sports
7. Conference Park
8. Green Spine
PERFORMATIVE LANDSCAPE
CITY HALL PARK
128
129
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
TECHNICAL
PROGRAM
OFFICE PARCEL
AREA
BUILDING
GFA
FOOTPRINT
COVERAGE
GFA 279,700
FOOTPRINT
COVERAGE
66%
4.60
187,200 279,700 92,500 187,200
29,860
66%
4.60
120,060 92,500 120,060 120,060
10,000 14,360
A
60,823
AREA
BUILDING
A
60,823
A1
PARCEL
B
30,556
B C
30,556 28,868
C D
28,868 56,374
D
56,374
E
77,379
E
77,379
A2 A1 A2 B1 B1 C1 C1 D1 D2 D1 D3 D2
98,525 120,060 98,525 98,525
91,585 98,525 72,000 91,585
10,000 29,860
14,360 9,000
3,425 72,000 3,425 3,425
685 9,000 685 685
D4 D3 D5 D4
3,305 3,425 3,425 3,305
685 685 685 685
D6 D5 D7 D6
3,305 3,425 900 3,305
685 685 225 685
D8 D7 D9 D8
900 900 900 900
225 225 225 225
D9 E1
52,718 900 33,008 52,718
225 10,601
E2 E1 E3 E2
6,570 33,008 6,570 6,570
438 10,601 438 438
E4 E3 PAÇO E4
6,570 6,570 N/A 6,570
438 438 9,865 438
PAÇO
N/A
9,865
FAR
% OFFICEm2
FAR
%
m2
0.53 149,32
60% 0.53 112,32 149,32
40% 112,32 37,00 60%
47%
3.93
40% 40%
48,02 37,00
47% -
3.93 3.41
40% 40%
48,02 48,02
0% 40%
48,02
23.2%
3.41 1.62
0% 31%
28,80
23.2%
1.62
40% 31%
28,80 28,80
40%
28,80
-
28.1%
0.68
20%
10,51
28.1%
0.68
20%
10,51
80%
5,25 -
20% 80%
1,31 5,25
60% 20%
3,94 1,31
60%
3,94
36.8%
% NET_TOTAL %
642,588
236,65 36.8%
PARKING NET_TOTAL
368,461 642,588
PARKING
368,461
TOTAL
1,010,149
354,984
TOTAL
1,010,149
354,984
118,32 236,65
118,32
CITY HALL PARK
ii
PROGRAM OFFICE
HOTEL
RETAIL
CULTURE PROGRAM
HEALTHCARE
TRANSPORT
LEISURE
% OFFICEm2
% HOTELm2
% RETAILm2
%CULTURE m2
HEALTHCARE % m2
TRANSPORT % m2
%LEISUREm2
%
%
%
%
%
%
m2
0.53 149,320
iii
m2
30%
84,020
60% 0.53 112,320 149,320
35% 30%
40% 112,320 37,000 60% 40% 40%
m2
7%
18,610
65,520 84,020
5% 7%
20% 35%
18,500 65,520
48,024 37,000
15% 20%
40% 40%
48,024 48,024
0% 40%
m2
%
m2
7%
18,500
9,360 18,610
0% 7%
18,500
3%
7,400
10% 5%
9,250 9,360
20% 0%
18,500
8%
7,400
18,009 18,500
30% 10%
36,018 9,250
10% 20%
12,006 18,500
3% 8%
3,602 7,400
15% 15%
18,009 18,009
30% 30%
36,018 36,018
10% 10%
12,006 12,006
3% 3%
48,024
20% 15%
19,705 18,009
30% 30%
29,558 36,018
10% 10%
9,853 12,006
0% 3%
0%
-
20% 20%
19,705 19,705
30% 30%
29,558 29,558
10% 10%
9,853 9,853
0%
31%
28,800
0% 20%
19,705
28% 30%
25,925 29,558
31% 10%
28,760 9,853
4%
40% 31%
28,800 28,800
0%
-
30% 28%
21,600 25,925
20% 31%
14,400 28,760
40%
28,800
30%
21,600
100% 20%
3,425 14,400
100%
3,425
100%
3,425
100%
3,425
100%
3,305
100% 100%
3,425 3,305
100% 100%
3,305 3,425
100% 100%
3,305
100%
900
100%
100%
900
100%
900
3%
7,400
0.00
m2 -
1%
m2
1,850
--
1%
1,850
-
2%
1,850
0.00
-
2% 2%
2,401 1,850
3,602 3,602
0.00
-
2% 2%
2,401 2,401
3,602
0.40
39,410
0% 2%
2,401
40% 0.40
39,410 39,410
0%
-
3,600
0.00 40%
39,410
4%
3,600
5% 4%
3,600 3,600
0.00
-
5% 4%
3,600 3,600
5%
3,600
5%
3,600
0.00
20%
10,512
0.00
-
5%
2,628
0.65 100%
34,322 900
0.10
5,256
-
0.00
-
20%
10,512
0.00
-
5%
2,628
100% 0.65
33,008 34,322
0.10
5,256
-
0.00
-
80%
5,256 -
--
20% 100%
1,314 33,008
20% 80%
1,314 5,256
--
0% 20%
1,314
80%
5,256
60% 20%
3,942 1,314
40%
2,628 -
0% 0%
--
80%
5,256
60%
3,942
40%
2,628
0%
-
36.8%
18.9%
17.5%
16.1%
3.1%
6.1%
1.2%
236,656 36.8%
121,734 18.9%
112,739 17.5%
103,441 16.1%
19,858 3.1%
39,410 6.1%
7,851 1.2%
118,328 236,656
60,867 121,734
56,369 112,739
86,200 103,441
9,929 19,858
32,842 39,410
3,926 7,851
118,328
60,867
56,369
86,200
9,929
32,842
3,926
354,984
182,601
169,108
189,641
29,787
72,252
11,777
354,984
182,601
169,108
189,641
29,787
72,252
11,777
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
PARCEL DATA
E
D1
E
E
E
77,379
D1 44,896
D D2 C2 C1
C 11,729
C1 B2
B
11,478
11,478
17,139
17,139
11,729
12,676
B 17,880
B1
A2
A1
C
44,896
D
D2 C2
B2
B1
77,379
A2
A
A
19,035
12,676
17,880
41,788 19,035
41,788
A1
PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL AREA
CITY HALL PARK
iv
EE 0.68 0.68
EE 28.1% 28.1%
SITE: SITE: 77.379 77.379 m2m2
FOOTPRINT: FOOTPRINT: 21,780 21,780 m2m2
DD 1.62 1.62
DD 23.2% 23.2%
SITE: SITE: 56.374 56.374m2m2
FOOTPRINT: FOOTPRINT: 13.100 13.100m2m2
CC 3.41 3.41
CC 0% 0%
SITE: SITE: 28.868 28.868 m2m2
FOOTPRINT: FOOTPRINT: n/an/a
BB 3.93 3.93
BB 47% 47%
SITE: SITE: 30,556 30,556 m2m2
FOOTPRINT: FOOTPRINT: 14,360 14,360 m2m2
AA 4.60 4.60
AA 66% 66%
SITE: SITE: 60,823 60,823 m2m2
PARCEL FAR
v
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
FOOTPRINT: FOOTPRINT: 39,860 39,860 m2m2
PARCEL COVERAGE
BUILDING DATA
E_1
33,008 m2
E_2
6.570 m2
3.425 m
D_3
2
3.425 m
Culture 3.425
D_7 900 m
2
Culture 3.425
Retail 3.425
D_8
900 m
3.425 m
Culture 3.425
Retail 900
900 m
Office 5.256 Culture 1.314
D_5 2
D_9 2
6.570 m2
Healthcare 5.256 Office 1.314
D_4
2
E_4
6.570 m2
Retail 2.628 Office 3.942
Culture 33.008
D_2
E_3
2
Retail 900
3.425 m
D_6 2
Culture 3.425
900 m2
Culture 3.425
D_10
3.425 m2
Culture 3.425
D_1 72.000 m2 Leisure 3.600 Healthcare 3.600 Culture 14.400 Retail 21.600 Office 28.800
CITY HALL PARK
vi
C_1 98.525 m2
Transport 39.410 Culture 9.852 Retail 29.557 Hotel 19.705
B_1
Leisure 2.401 Healthcare 3.601 Culture12.006
120.060 m2
Retail 36.018 Hotel 18.009 Office 48.024
A_2 92.500 m2
Leisure 1.850 Healthcare 7.400 Culture 18.500 Retail 9.250 Hotel 18.500 Office 37.00
A_1 187.200 m2
Retail 9.436
Hotel 65.520
Office 112.320
vii
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
MOBILITY
ieta SP-150 Rodovia Anch
To SAO PAULO
To SANTOS
MOTORWAY
New
Me
tro
line
pro
pos
ed
We st
-Ea
st
NEW METRO LINE PROPOSED CITY HALL PARK
viii
gu
eir
ro
ei
t on
ez
e
Av .F
ran
co
Pre
ste
sM
aia
eiro Av. Brigad doro echal Deo Rua Mar
Rua Juru
cis
a Faria Lim
M N.
batuba
. Av
An
arc
ad
dr
de
aG
ira Ba
No
Av. P ere
as
gueiro
uc
Av. Senador Ver
Av .L
To DIADEMA
rreto
To SANTO ANDRE
Av. Rotary
PRIMARY ROADS
m
400
DISTANCES FROM METRO STATIONS ix
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
MOBILITY
Av. P
ery
Ro
nch
Av. Wa lla
Av. Im
ce
per
ado
ett
Sim
i
r Pe
ons
dro
en
II
SECONDARY ROADS
Bus Terminal Metropolitano de S.B.C.
Bus Terminal Joao Setti
Bus Terminal Ferrazopolis
BUS STOPS CITY HALL PARK
x
Metro line 18
- BRONZE
M-11 Baeta Neves
M-12 Paco Municipal
M-13 Djalma Dutra
M-14 Pรงa. Lauro Gomes
M-15 Ferrazopolis
METRO LINE 18
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES xi
Sร O BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE ACCESS RETAIL
CITY HALL PARK
xii
PARKING
P P
P P
P
xiii
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
P
SITE ACCESS EMERGENCIES
CITY HALL PARK
xiv
DROPOFF
xv
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE ACCESS BIKES
CITY HALL PARK
xvi
CARS
xvii
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SITE ACCESS DELIVERIES
CITY HALL PARK
xviii
PEDESTRIANS
xix
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
APPENDIX
WORLD ECONOMY
1,850 1,736
3,577
10th CANADA
4th Germany
3,577
9th Russia
7th UK 1,493
2,776
12th Spain 15,094
5th France
5,870
2,198
8th Italy
1st USA
11th India 2,492
6th Brazil
3rd Japan
7,298
1,676
2nd China
GDP - US $billions
National Nominal GDP Source: Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program /Sérgio Costa | Investe São Paulo | Global Cities Initiative
1st China 15,523,658
8th Russia
(%)
1,968,789
3.3
2nd Japan
2.9
10th France 2.5
2.1
1.7
4,105,853
n
latio opu
p
1,682,814
5th USA
201,032,714 (2013)
8,554,219
3rd Germany 5,388,456
9th Mexico 1,810,007
Po
pu
1.2
4th South Korea
lat
ion
7th Brazil 2,623,704
0.8
gro
wt
6th India hr
ate
4,167,089
3,285,496
0.4
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2011
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2012
Car Industries in the world
CITY HALL PARK
xxii
9th Russia 143,657,134
1st China 1,360,720,000
3rd USA
6th Pakistan
317,518,000
10th Japan
185,613,000
127,220,000
8th Bangladesh
2nd India
7th Nigeria
1,240,210,000
173,615,000
5th Brazil
152,518,015
4th Indonesia 249,866,000
201,032,714
Most populated countries
(%) 3.3
9th Russia 143,657,134
2.9
2.5
1st 201,032,714 China
n
ulatio
3rd USA
pop
1,360,720,000
(2013)
6th Pakistan
317,518,000
10th Japan
185,613,000
127,220,000
2.1
8th Bangladesh 1.7
2nd India
Po
pu
7th Nigeria lat io
1,240,210,000
173,615,000n gro
1.2
wt
5th Brazil
hr
ate
0.4
1960
1970
1980
1990
Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2012
Most populated countries
xxiii
SĂƒO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
2000
4th Indonesia 249,866,000
201,032,714
0.8
152,518,015
2011
BRAZIL
Roraima
Amapá
Amazonas
Maranhão
Pará
Ceará Rio Grande do Norte Paraíba Piauí
Pernambuco
Acre
Alagoas
Tocantins
Sergipe
Rondônia Bahia
Mato Grosso
Distrito Federal Goiás Minas Gerais Espírito Santo Mato Grosso do Sul
São Paulo
Rio de Janeiro
Paraná
Santa Catarina
Rio Grande do Sul
ADMINISTRATION
26 States
BRAZIL
625 Municipalities
SAO PAULO STATE
39 Municipalities
SAO PAULO METROPOLITAN REGION
SAO PAULO
CITY HALL PARK
xxiv
FERNANDÓPOLIS
JALES
ITUVERAVA
VOTUPORANGA
BARRETOS AURIFLAMA
FRANCA SÃO JOAQUIM DA BARRA
SÃO JOSÉ DO RIO PRETO NHANDEARA
ANDRADINA
CATANDUVA
ARAÇATUBA
ADAMANTINA
RIBEIRÃO PRETO
NOVO HORIZONTE
BIRIGUI
DRACENA
BATATAIS JABOTICABAL
LINS
SÃO JOÃO DA BOA VISTA
ARARAQUARA TUPÃ
PRESIDENTE PRUDENTE
PIRAÇUNUNGA
SÃO CARLOS
MARÍLIA
BAURU
JAÚ
RIO CLARO
LIMEIRA
MOJI-MIRIM
ASSIS AMPARO
GUARATINGUETÁ
PIRACICABA
BANANAL
CAMPOS DO JORDÃO CAMPINAS
BOTUCATU OURINHOS
BRAGANÇA PAULISTA AVARÉ
SÃO JOSÉ DOS CAMPOS
JUNDIAÍ
TATUÍ
PARAIBUNA/PARAITINGA FRANCO DA ROCHA SOROCABA
GUARULHOS
OSASCO
ITAPETININGA
CARAGUATATUBA
MOJI DAS CRUZES SÃO PAULO
ITAPEVA
ITAPECERICA DA SERRA PIEDADE
SANTOS
CARAGUATATUBA
ITANHAÉM
CAPÃO BONITO REGISTRO
São Paulo is the largest Brazilian metro area. It is also home to the largest employment base (9.5 million workers), the largest GDP ($473 billion makes up 20 percent of the Brazilian GDP and ranks 11th globally), and the second highest GDP per capita ($23,704 ranks only behind Brasília). 0
xxv
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
80
160
320 Kilometers
! H ! H
! H ! H
BRAZIL
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
INFRASTRUCTURE
! H
! H H ! H ! ! H
Airborn connections - Passenger ! H
! H! H
Source: ANAC-Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil, 2005.
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H H ! H ! ! H
Airborne connections - Cargo Source: ANAC-Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil, 2005.
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H ! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H ! H ! H
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H ! H! H H ! H!
! H ! H
! H
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H
! H ! H ! H
! H
! H ! H ! H
! H
! H !H
H ! H !
H ! H! ! H ! H ! H! H H ! H!
! H
! H ! H ! H
! H
! H
H ! H !
! H ! H ! H ! H
! H ! H
! H H ! H ! ! H
! H ! H ! H ! H
Passengers (x1000)
50-150
! H ! H
! H ! H
! H ! H
! H !H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H!H
! H ! H ! H
! H ! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
H ! H !
H ! H! ! H ! H ! H! H H ! H!
! H ! H ! H ! H
! H
! H ! H
! H
H ! H! ! H ! H ! H! H H ! H!
! H ! H ! H
! H H ! H ! ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H ! H ! H
! H
! H ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
H ! H! ! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
H ! H ! ! H
! H
H ! H !
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H
! H ! H
! H ! H
! H
! H ! H ! H ! H
! H ! H ! H ! H ! H
! H ! H
Cargo (x1000Kg)
500-1000
300-500
1000-2500 2500-5000
500-1000
5000-10000
1000-3000
10000-20000
150-300
Primary Road Network Primary Road Network
Rail Network Rail Network
Source: ANAC-Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil, 2005.
Source: ANAC-Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil, 2005.
CITY HALL PARK
xxvi
!
Água Boa
! !
Uruaçu
Nova Xavantina
!
"
Ceres
!
Barra do Garças
!
Brasília
Goiás
" !
Januária
%
Jaraguá
São Luís de Montes Belos
!
"
Anápolis
!
Unaí
Goiânia
%
" !
!
!
!
Acreúna
!
Pires do Rio
!
!
"
Jataí
Rio Verde
!
! Santa Helena de Goiás
!
!
!
Bocaiúva
Pirapora
! Caldas Novas
Montes Claros
Paracatu
Mineiros Morrinhos
Ipameri
!
Várzea da Palma
João Pinheiro
Goiatuba
!
Catalão
! !
Quirinópolis
"
"
Araguari
!
Chapadão do Sul
" !
"
Ituiutaba
Patos de Minas
Monte Carmelo
!
Uberlândia !
Paranaíba
!
Iturama
" !
Santa Fé do Sul
! !
!
!
Jales
!
!
Uberaba
"
Araxá
!
!
!
!
!
"!
Guararapes
!
!
!
"
!
"
"
"
Maringá
Cianorte
! !
"
Bandeirantes Cornélio ! Procópio
"
"
"
Arapongas
!
Araraquara
São Manuel
"
Botucatu
!
!
Telêmaco Borba
Laranjeiras do Sul
"
Itapeva !
o Beltrão
" !
"
"
"
Chapecó
" "
Concórdia
"
Erechim
xxvii "
Canoinhas
"
!
Antonina
"
Paranaguá
Mafra Rio Negrinho São Bento do Sul ! !
!
Timbó
Jundiaí
!
"
" !
São Lourenço
Paraíba do Sul ! !
!
Itajubá
!
Cruzeiro
"
Resende
"
Três Rios
Valença
Teresópolis
! Volta Redonda
"
Rio de Janeiro
Lorena
Aparecida !"
! Bragança Paulista
"
São José dos Campos
Angra dos Reis
%
" São Paulo
%
!
"
Joinville !
São Francisco do Sul
!
Gaspar
"! Navegantes !
Curitibanos
"
Caraguatatuba São Sebastião
Santos
Registro
Lages
%
“Grand”National Metropolis
%
National Metropolis
%
Metropolis
"
Regional Capital
Tijucas
"
Subregional Center
!
Local Center
!
Campos Novos
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
National Linkages
Camboriú
Rio do Sul
"
Florianópolis
!
Juiz de Fora
Caxambu
Santa Rita do Sapucaí
! ! Guaratinguetá
Ubá
São João Nepomuceno
"
Cambuí
Extrema
"
"
Blumenau Itajaí
"
Videira
Joaçaba
!
Campinas
"
Rio Pomba
Lapa
Caçador
!
!
"
Capão Bonito
Palmas
Xanxerê
Sorocaba
Piedade !
!
São João del Rei Barbacena
Três Corações
Pouso Alegre
"
Socorro Serra Negra ! ! Amparo
!
"
"
Conselheiro Lafaiete
Itararé
% !
"
"
Tatuí
Itapetininga
!
!
!
Curitiba
!
Capivari
"
"
Lavras
!
!
"
Ponta Grossa
Irati
União da Vitória
! Mogi Guaçu Moji!Mirim Itapira ! !
Ponte Nova
Congonhas ! Ouro Branco
"
Perdões
Andradas
Jacutinga Ouro Fino
Ouro Preto
Varginha
Poços de Caldas
Espírito Santo do Pinhal
!
Castro
s
Pato Branco
!
Rio das Pedras
!
Três Pontas
"
Oliveira
Itabirito
Jaguariaíva
Guarapuava
!
João Monlevade
Campo Belo
São João da Boa Vista
!
Araras
!
!
!
"
"
Leme
Alfenas
São José do Rio Pardo
Wenceslau Braz
Ivaiporã
!
!
Limeira
!
"
"
" Piracicaba
Tietê
"
!
Boa Esperança
Guaxupé
Santa Cruz das Palmeiras
!Cerquilho
Apucarana
Formiga
!
Mococa
Pirassununga
"
"
"
!
!
Rio Claro
Jandaia do Sul
!
!
Santa Rita do Passa Quatro
!
Avaré
"
!
!
!
!
Cajuru
! ! Descalvado
São Carlos
!
!
%
Pará de Minas
"
Arcos
São Sebastião do Paraíso
!
! Santo Antônio da Platina
Ibaiti
!
Cravinhos
Barra Bonita
" "
Piraju
!
Jaú
Santa Cruz do Rio Pardo
Campo Mourão
"
!
Lençóis Paulista
!
Jacarezinho
!
Passos
Ribeirão Preto
Pederneiras
Palmital
!
"
!
!
! Ourinhos
Londrina !
"
Batatais
Matão
Ibitinga
Bauru
Assis !
Nova Esperança
"
!
"
"
"
!
!
"
Itaú de Minas !
!
Paraguaçu Paulista
Porecatu
" Franca
Orlândia
Taquaritinga
Tupã
Marília Garça
!
!
!
Lins
Belo Horizonte
Nova Serrana
São Joaquim da Barra
Bebedouro
Itápolis
Teodoro Sampaio
Paranavaí !
!
Novo Horizonte
!
Rancharia
!
!
! !
Santa Adélia Monte Alto ! ! Jaboticabal !
Itajobi
Ituverava
!
Catanduva
Osvaldo Cruz
Presidente Prudente !
!
Promissão
!
!
"
!
Penápolis
Adamantina
!
José Bonifácio
!
Olímpia
!
"
!
Presidente Venceslau
Tanabi
Birigui
Dracena
Bataguassu
"
Guaíra
Barretos
"
Andradina
Araçatuba
!
!
São José do Rio Preto!
Itabira
Itaúna Divinópolis !
Votuporanga
Sud Mennucci
!
Pitangui
! Bom Despacho
Frutal
Fernandópolis
Ilha Solteira
Três Lagoas
"
"
!
São Gotardo
!
!
Guanhães
Cassilândia
!
!
Curvelo
Patrocínio
!
!
Diamantina
Itumbiara
! !
Janaúba
!
!
BRAZIL
METROPOLITAN NOMINAL GDP
Roraima Amapá
Manaus
$ 31,031
Amazonas
Fortaleza
Maranhão
Pará
Ceará
$ 31,031
Rio Grande do Norte
Paraíba Piauí
Recife
Pernambuco
$ 36,494
Acre Alagoas
Tocantins
Sergipe
Rondônia
Bahia Mato Grosso
Salvador
$ 54,624
Brasília $ 139,209
Goiás
Distrito Federal
Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte $ 94,895
Espírito Santo Mato Grosso do Sul
Grande Vitória
$ 31,104 São Paulo Rio de Janeiro
Campinas $ 61,487
Rio de Janeiro $ 194,875
Paraná
Curitiba
Nominal GDP (x1000$)
São Paulo
$ 65,148
$ 472,984
500 Santa Catarina
Baixada Santista $ 28,423
250
100
Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre $ 74,834
CITY HALL PARK
xxviii
Top 3 Metropolitan Areas Profile
Source: Brookings Institution, Global Monitor 2012
São Paulo
Rio de Janeiro
Brasília
Population in millions 2012
20.0
12.0
3.8
Employment in millions 2010
9.5
5.3
1.8
GDP per capita 2012
$23,704
$16,282
$36,175
Exports in billions 2007-2012
$99.9
$46.2
$2.4
Share of metro area output by industry (2012) Share of metro area output by industry (2012) Source: Brookings Institution, Global Monitor 2012
1.80% 6.10%
0.70% 2.40% 8.00%
2.40%
1.80%
1.80%
5.90%
6.10%
6.10%
14.50%
14.50%
0.70% 2.40%
0.70% 2.40%
8.00%
8.00%
2.40%
2
5.90%
5
17.60%
17.60%
1
19.90%
19.90%
1
17.70%
1
32.30% 4.00% 0.30%
3 4 0
14.50%
30.40%
30.40%
30.40%
5.90%
5.90%
5.90%
17.70% 62.10% 1.80%
28.40% 3.50%
9.30%
Rio de Janeiro
xxix
Commodities Construction 20.60% Business/Finance 3.90% Manufacturing 0.50% Local Market Trade and Tourism Brazilia Transportation Utilities
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
32.30% 4.00% 0.30%
Sao Paulo
28.40%
28.40%
3.50%
3.50%
9.30%
9.30%
Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroBrazilia
62.10% 1.80%
62.10% 1.80%
20.60% 3.90% 0.50%
20.60% 3.90% 0.50%
Brazilia Sao Paulo
Sao Paulo
SÃO PAULO
METROPOLITAN ANALYSIS
PRIMARY ROAD NETWORK
SECONDARY ROAD NETWORK
7
7
13
19
16 1
1
6
23 2 11 21 11
12
11
12 8
8
12
3
3
4
4
5 17
2
2
15
4
5
5 20
9
9
18
10
10
9
0
5
10
20 Kilometers
EXISTING METRO NETWORK
PROPOSED METRO NETWORK
FRANCISCO MORATO SANTA ISABEL FRANCO DA ROCHA
MAIRIPORÃ
CAJAMAR CAIEIRAS
PIRAPORA DO BOM JESUS
ARUJÁ GUARULHOS
SANTANA DE PARNAÍBA
GUARAREMA
ITAQUAQUECETUBA SÃO PAULO
BARUERI
ITAPEVI
OSASCO
JANDIRA
POÁ FERRAZ DE VASCONCELOS
CARAPICUÍBA
TABOÃO DA SERRA
VARGEM GRANDE PAULISTA
SUZANO SÃO CAETANO DO SUL
EMBU
BIRITIBA-MIRIM
MAUÁ DIADEMA
COTIA
SALESÓPOLIS
MOGI DAS CRUZES
RIBEIRÃO PIRES RIO GRANDE DA SERRA
ITAPECERICA DA SERRA SANTO ANDRÉ
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO SÃO LOURENÇO DA SERRA EMBU-GUAÇU
JUQUITIBA
RAIL NETWORK
GREEN SPACES
CITY HALL PARK
xxx
FRANCISCO MORATO SANTA ISABEL FRANCO DA ROCHA
MAIRIPORÃ
CAJAMAR CAIEIRAS
PIRAPORA DO BOM JESUS
ARUJÁ GUARULHOS
SANTANA DE PARNAÍBA
GUARAREMA
ITAQUAQUECETUBA SÃO PAULO
BARUERI
ITAPEVI
OSASCO
JANDIRA
POÁ FERRAZ DE VASCONCELOS
CARAPICUÍBA
TABOÃO DA SERRA
VARGEM GRANDE PAULISTA
SUZANO SÃO CAETANO DO SUL
EMBU
MAUÁ DIADEMA
COTIA
RIBEIRÃO PIRES RIO GRANDE DA SERRA
ITAPECERICA DA SERRA SANTO ANDRÉ
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO SÃO LOURENÇO DA SERRA EMBU-GUAÇU
0
JUQUITIBA
xxxi
5
10
20
CIVIC FUNCTIONS
MUNICIPALITIES
LIBRARIES
MUSEUMS
UNIVERSITIES
HOSPITALS
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Kilometers
SALESÓPOLIS
MOGI DAS CRUZES
BIRITIBA-MIRIM
SÃO PAULO
METROPOLITAN AREA
FRANCISCO MORATO 7
FRANCO DA ROCHA
MAIRIPORÃ
CAJAMAR
CAIEIRAS
PIRAPORA DO BOM JESUS
GUAR
SANTANA DE PARNAÍBA SÃO PAULO
1
BARUERI 8
OSASCO ITAPEVI
JANDIRA 4
CARAPICUÍBA
2
VARGEM GRANDE PAULISTA
TABOÃO DA SERRA
SÃO CAETANO DO SUL 5
EMBU
DIADEMA
COTIA
9
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
ITAPECERICA DA SERRA
SÃO LOURENÇO DA SERRA EMBU-GUAÇU
JUQUITIBA
0
5
10
20 Kilometers CITY HALL PARK
xxxii
SANTA ISABEL
ARUJÁ
RULHOS GUARAREMA
ITAQUAQUECETUBA
12
11
POÁ 3
FERRAZ DE VASCONCELOS
SALESÓPOLIS
MOGI DAS CRUZES
SUZANO BIRITIBA-MIRIM
MAUÁ
RIBEIRÃO PIRES RIO GRANDE DA SERRA 10
SANTO ANDRÉ
HOSPITAL MARKET HOTEL SCHOOL LIBRARY THEATRE UNIVERSITY MUSEUM
xxxiii
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
LONDON
Cambridge
Milton Keynes
Ipswich Luton
Oxford
LONDON Reading
Chatham & Gillingham
outh
8,287 km2 7,100,000 (2008) 1,100 per km² 173 municipalities
Density ( people/m2)
Brighton Road Network
Rail Network Cambridge
Cambridge
Milton Keynes
Milton Keynes Ipswich
Luton
Ipswich Luton
Oxford
Oxford
LONDON
LONDON
Reading
Reading
Chatham & Gillingham
Southampton
Chatham & Gillingham
CITY HALL PARK
xxxiv
RANDSTAD
Alkmaar
Haarlem Almere
AMSTERDAM Amersfoort
The Hague
Utrecht
Rotterdam
8,308 km2 15,010,295 (2012) 5,285 per km² City + 32 boroughs
Density ( people/m2)
Road Network
Rail Network
Alkmaar
Alkmaar
Haarlem
Haarlem Almere
Almere
AMSTERDAM
AMSTERDAM Amersfoort
The Hague
Utrecht
Rotterdam
xxxv
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Amersfoort
The Hague
Utrecht
Rotterdam
SÃO BERNANDO DO CAMPO
FERRAZ DE VASCONCELOS
SUZANO
SÃO CAETANO DO SUL
MAUÁ
SANTO ANDRÉ
DIADEMA
RIBEIRÃO PIRES
RIO GRANDE DA SERRA
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
CUBATÃO SÃO PAULO
SANTOS
SÃO VICENTE
PRAIA GRANDE ITANHAÉM
MONGAGUÁ
0
2.5
5
10 Kilometers
CITY HALL PARK
xxxvi
SAO BERNANDO DO CAMPO
DEMOGRAPHICS
Density Sex Ratio
Habitants/Km2
0 - 85
< 2.000
85 - 90
2.000 - 5.000
90 - 94.5
5.000 - 10.000
94.5 - 99.4
10.000 - 20.000
99.4 - 100
50.000 - 100.000 > 100000
Unoccupied Individual Housing
0 - 2.6
17 - 33
2.6 - 3
93 - 51
3 - 3.35
52 - 84
3.35 - 3.75
85 - 228
3.75 - 7
Individual Housing
xxxvii
SÃ&#x192;O BERNARDO DO CAMPO
Average Habitants per House
0 - 16
Collective Housing
10 -135
0-1
135 - 200
2-3
200 - 270
4-5
270 - 340
6-7
340 - 640
8 - 20
GUARULHOS
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SANTO ANDRÉ
OSASCO
MAUA
DIADEMA
MOGI DAS CRUZER
ITAQUAQUECETUBA CARAPICUÍBA
HOUSING CONDITION
INFRASTRUCTURE
PUBLIC SERVICES
MOBILITY
URBAN WELFARE
SÃO PAULO
CITY HALL PARK
xxxviii
Index of infrastructure condition
0.9
0.8
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
OSASCO
DIADEMA CARAPICUÍBA MAUÁ
GUARULHOS
0.7
SANTO ANDRÉ MOGI DAS CRUZES
0.6
ITAQUAQUECETUBA
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Mobility indicator Each is the result of a set of indicators drawn from the 2010 census, the IBGE. It is considered that the dimensions that constitute the IBEU have the same weight, since the indicators, in turn, have different weights. The IBEU is therefore the result of the average of five dimensions. The index varies between 0 and 1 values, and the closer to 0 the worse is the assessment and closer to 1 the better.
Legend 1.000 - 0.901 0.900 - 0.801 0.800 - 0.701 0.700 - 0.501 0.500 - 0.001
xxxix
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
SANTO ANDRÉ
MOGI DAS CRUZES
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO GUARULHOS OSASCO DIADEMA CARAPICUÍBA
14km 15km
16km
18km
20km
ITAQUAQUECETUBA
MAUÁ
30km
22km
46km
SAO PAULO
1h 10min
1h25min
1h25min 1h40min
1h 45min
2h7min
2h10min
2h 40min
Distances and travel time from Sao Paulo city
CITY HALL PARK
xl
Main distances of municipalities form Sao Paulo
> More job positions available than the residents
>
More residents than job positions available
Concentration of job position and residences
800,000 500,000 200,000
Job positions available
Residents
Site of intervention
GUARULHOS ITAQUAQUECETUBA CARAPICUÍBA
SAO PAULO
46km
OSASCO
MOGI DAS CRUZES
DIADEMA
SANTO ANDRÉ
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
xli
SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
MAUÁ
CREDITS DOMAIN M i tes h D i x i t Sv en J ans s e Kater i na Sal oni k i di Yi anni s Ts os k ounogl ou
CITY HALL PARK SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO
DOMAIN