Page 77

66

Adults with Behavioral Health Needs under Correctional Supervision

82. Lowenkamp, Chistopher J., Edward J. Latessa, and Alexander M. Holsinger, “The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned from 13,676 Offenders and 97 Corrections Programs?” Crime and Delinquency 52, no. 1 (January 2006): 77–93. 83. Andrews, “The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model.” 84. Bonta and Andrews, Risk-Need-Responsivity Model. 85. Andrews, Donald A., Ivan Zinger, Robert D. Hoge, James Bonta, Paul Gendreau, and Francis T. Cullen, “Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis,” Criminology 28, no. 3 (1990): 369–404. 86. Andrews, Donald A., Craig Dowden, and Paul Gendreau, “Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Approaches to Reduced Reoffending: A Meta-Analytic Study of Human Service, Risk, Need, Responsivity, and Other Concerns in Justice Contexts” (unpublished manuscript, 1999). 87. Bonta and Andrews, Risk-Need-Responsivity Model; Andrews, Donald A., James Bonta, and Steve Wormith, “The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment,” Crime & Delinquency 52, no. 1 (2006): 7–27; Andrews, Donald A., and James Bonta, “Rehabilitating Criminal Justice Policy and Practice,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 16, no. 1 (2010): 39–55; Taxman, Faye S., and Douglas B. Marlowe, “Risk, Needs, Responsivity: In Action or Inaction?” Crime & Delinquency 52, no. 1 (2006): 3–6. 88. Dowden, Craig, and Donald A. Andrews, “The Importance of Staff Practices in Delivering Effective Correctional Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Core Correctional Practices,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48, no. 2 (2004): 203–214. 89. Bonta and Andrews, Risk-Need-Responsivity Model. 90. Andrews, “The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model.” 91. Andrews, et al, “The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment,” Crime & Delinquency 7–27; Andrews and Bonta, “Rehabilitating Criminal Justice Policy and Practice,” 46. 92. Lowenkamp, Chris, and Edward J. Latessa, “Increasing the Effectiveness of Correctional Programming Through the Risk Principle: Identifying Offenders for Residential Placement,” Criminology and Public Policy 4, no. 2 (2005): 263–290; Clement, Marshall, Matthew Schwarzfeld, and Michael Thompson, The National Summit on Justice Reinvestment and Public Safety (New York, NY: Council of State Governments Justice Center, 2011). 93. Aos, Steve, Marna Miller, and Elizabeth Drake, Evidence-Based Adult Corrections Programs: What Works and What Does Not (Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2006). 94. The Pew Center on the States, Risk/Needs Assessment 101: Science Reveals New Tools to Manage Offenders (Washington, D.C.: The Pew Center on the States, 2011); Bonta and Andrews, Risk-Need-Responsivity Model. 95. Kessler et al, “The Epidemiology of Co-Occurring Addictive and Mental Disorders: Implications for Prevention and Service Utilization,” 17–31. 96. Covington, Stephanie S. and Barbara Bloom, “Gender-Responsive Treatment and Services in Correctional Settings,” Women and Therapy 29, no. 3/4 (2006): 9–33. 97. Bennett, Trevor H., Katy Holloway, and David Farrington, “The Statistical Association Between Drug Misuse and Crime: A Meta-Analysis,” Aggression and Violent Behavior 13, no. 2 (2008): 107–118. 98. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Drugs, Brains and Behavior: The Science of Addiction (Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, revised 2010). 99. Mumola and Karberg, Drug Use and Dependence; Karberg and James, Substance Dependence. 100. Smith, Paula, Frances T. Cullen, and Edward J. Latessa, “Can 14,737 Women be Wrong? A Meta-Analysis of the LSI-R and Recidivism for Female Offenders,” Criminology and Public Policy 8, no. 1 (2009): 183–208. 101. Andrews and Bonta, “Rehabilitating Criminal Justice Policy and Practice,” 39–55. (Citing Andrews et al, “Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis,”

Profile for CSG Justice Center

behavioral_framework  

behavioral_framework  

Advertisement