Page 1

Knetwork Project

• Cristobal Cobo (draft version 0.1)


Schenk, Michael (1995): Soziale Netzwerke und Massenmedien. Untersuchungen zum Einfluß der  persönlichen Kommunikation. Tübingen

Structural

F ti Functional l Exchange of resources; role of  communication; job relief;  nature of support; available  pp ; help or assistance; value and  norm‐orientation.

Density and diversity of the network and its actors;  potential members; existence of bridges, centres,  peripheral or isolated actors; intercultural  multiplexity (multiple but also complex structures),  (multiple but also complex structures) geographical distance, process‐orientation.

Relational Reciprocity; diversity of the content of ties;  homogeneity or heterogeneity; strong or  weak commitments; latent and current ties;  ; ; intensity (frequency of contact); duration  (stability); access opportunities linked to  ties; communication channels; roles, etc.


Relational a) Mode of Interaction  High: mixed‐synchrony High: mixed synchrony & asynchrony.  & asynchrony. Medium: computer mediated  communication. Low: face to face. b) Degree of Interactions High: crowd. Medium: partners or stakeholders. Low: one to one. c) Frequency of Interactions High: always. Medium: constantly.  Low: rarely. d) Academy & Industry  e) Academy & Academy f)  Academy & Government g) Government & Industry h) Industry & Industry i) Government & Government j) Civil Society & Civil Society k) Civil Society & Government l) Civil Society & Academy

Level of  complexity or diversity:


Functional: m) Dimension of the problem High: macro. High: macro. Medium: medium‐scale. Low: micro. n) Nature of the problem High: ill‐structured. Medium: semi‐structured. Low: well‐structured. o) Applicability of the solution High: long‐term. Medium:  middle‐term. Low: short term. p) Nature of the solution High: radical (discontinuous). M di Medium:  middle‐term. iddl t Low: incremental (continuous). q) Tiers of the Intervention High: consistently effective. Medium: variable effectiveness Medium: variable effectiveness. Low: little or no effect.

Level of  complexity or diversity:


Structural: r) Architecture High: totally distributed. High: totally distributed. Medium: horizontal. Low: hierarchical. s) Flow of information High: open. Medium: partially open. Low: closed (non‐public). t) Type of collaboration High: informal. Medium:  hybrid. Low: formal.

Level of  complexity or diversity:


Relational a) Mode of Interaction  High: mixed‐synchrony &  y y asynchrony.  Medium: computer mediated  communication. Low: face to face. b) Degree of Interactions High: Crowd High: Crowd. Medium: partners or  stakeholders. Low: One to one. c) Frequency of Interactions High: Always. Medium: Constantly.  Low: Rarely. d) Academy & Industry  e) Academy & Academy f)  Academy & Government g) Government & Industry

Functional: Level of complexity or diversity:

m) Dimension of the problem High: macro. Medium: medium‐scale. L Low: micro. i n) Nature of the problem High: ill‐structured. Medium: semi‐structured. Low: well‐structured. o) Applicability of the solution High: long‐term. Medium:  middle‐term. Low: short term. p) Nature of the solution High: radical (discontinuous). Medium:  middle‐term. Low: incremental (continuous). q) Tiers of the Intervention q) Tiers of the Intervention High: consistently effective. Medium: variable effectiveness. Low: little or no effect.

h) Industry & Industry

Structural:

i) Government & Government

r) Architecture High: totally distributed. Medium: horizontal. Low: hierarchical.

j) Civil Society & Civil Society k) Civil Society & Government l) Civil Society & Academy

s) Flow of information High: open. Medium: partially open. Low: closed (non‐public). t) Type of collaboration High: informal. Medium:  hybrid. Low: formal.


Relational a) Mode of Interaction  High: mixed‐synchrony &  y y asynchrony.  Medium: computer mediated  communication. Low: face to face.

Functional: Level of complexity or diversity:

m) Dimension of the problem High: macro. Medium: medium‐scale. L Low: micro. i n) Nature of the problem High: ill‐structured. Medium: semi‐structured. Low: well‐structured.

b) Degree of Interactions High: Crowd High: Crowd. Medium: partners or  stakeholders. Low: One to one.

o) Applicability of the solution High: long‐term. Medium:  middle‐term. Low: short term.

c) Frequency of Interactions High: Always. Medium: Constantly.  Low: Rarely.

p) Nature of the solution High: radical (discontinuous). Medium:  middle‐term. Low: incremental (continuous).

d) Academy & Industry 

q) Tiers of the Intervention q) Tiers of the Intervention High: consistently effective. Medium: variable effectiveness. Low: little or no effect.

e) Academy & Academy f)  Academy & Government g) Government & Industry h) Industry & Industry

Structural:

i) Government & Government

r) Architecture High: totally distributed. Medium: horizontal. Low: hierarchical.

j) Civil Society & Civil Society k) Civil Society & Government l) Civil Society & Academy

s) Flow of information High: open. Medium: partially open. Low: closed (non‐public).

Case: Wikipedia

t) Type of collaboration High: informal. Medium:  hybrid. Low: formal.


Relational a) Mode of Interaction  High: mixed‐synchrony &  y y asynchrony.  Medium: computer mediated  communication. Low: face to face.

Functional: Level of complexity or diversity:

m) Dimension of the problem High: macro. Medium: medium‐scale. L Low: micro. i n) Nature of the problem High: ill‐structured. Medium: semi‐structured. Low: well‐structured.

b) Degree of Interactions High: Crowd High: Crowd. Medium: partners or  stakeholders. Low: One to one.

o) Applicability of the solution High: long‐term. Medium:  middle‐term. Low: short term.

c) Frequency of Interactions High: Always. Medium: Constantly.  Low: Rarely.

p) Nature of the solution High: radical (discontinuous). Medium:  middle‐term. Low: incremental (continuous).

d) Academy & Industry 

q) Tiers of the Intervention q) Tiers of the Intervention High: consistently effective. Medium: variable effectiveness. Low: little or no effect.

e) Academy & Academy f)  Academy & Government g) Government & Industry h) Industry & Industry

Structural:

i) Government & Government

r) Architecture High: totally distributed. Medium: horizontal. Low: hierarchical.

j) Civil Society & Civil Society k) Civil Society & Government l) Civil Society & Academy

s) Flow of information High: open. Medium: partially open. Low: closed (non‐public).

Case: KNetwork

t) Type of collaboration High: informal. Medium:  hybrid. Low: formal.


Relational a) Mode of Interaction  High: mixed‐synchrony &  y y asynchrony.  Medium: computer mediated  communication. Low: face to face.

Functional: Level of complexity or diversity:

m) Dimension of the problem High: macro. Medium: medium‐scale. L Low: micro. i n) Nature of the problem High: ill‐structured. Medium: semi‐structured. Low: well‐structured.

b) Degree of Interactions High: Crowd High: Crowd. Medium: partners or  stakeholders. Low: One to one.

o) Applicability of the solution High: long‐term. Medium:  middle‐term. Low: short term.

c) Frequency of Interactions High: Always. Medium: Constantly.  Low: Rarely.

p) Nature of the solution High: radical (discontinuous). Medium:  middle‐term. Low: incremental (continuous).

d) Academy & Industry 

q) Tiers of the Intervention q) Tiers of the Intervention High: consistently effective. Medium: variable effectiveness. Low: little or no effect.

e) Academy & Academy f)  Academy & Government g) Government & Industry h) Industry & Industry

Structural:

i) Government & Government

r) Architecture High: totally distributed. Medium: horizontal. Low: hierarchical.

j) Civil Society & Civil Society k) Civil Society & Government l) Civil Society & Academy

s) Flow of information High: open. Medium: partially open. Low: closed (non‐public).

Case: Wikipedia Case: KNetwork

t) Type of collaboration High: informal. Medium:  hybrid. Low: formal.

Network topology (draft 0.1)  

Network topology is the layout pattern of interconnections of the various elements (links, nodes, etc.) of a computer network. Common netwo...

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you