__MAIN_TEXT__

Page 32

POWER

CHUCK ROSS

| NZB: ONSITE POWER |

Hybrid Approaches to Onsite Power Project developers shouldn’t be so myopic when it comes to onsite power approaches. Instead of a one-or-nothing mentality, developers should consider a hybrid design—one that brings together more than a single resource or one that addresses multiple energy needs simultaneously.

Chuck Ross is a freelance writer covering building design and technology topics. He has been writing about building efficiency issues, including onsite energy and demandside management topics, for more than 20 years.

T

o meet the onsite power needs of net zero projects, developers often focus on a single resource—primarily, onsite solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays—to generate the electricity needed to offset a facility’s demand. But such single-mindedness can maximize the impact of that technology’s downsides—such as the fact PV can’t meet electricity needs after the sun goes down—and limit overall usefulness toward reaching net-zero goals.

While it is dependent on fossil fuel to power the generator, the fact that it captures heat that otherwise would be wasted makes it a highly efficient means for meeting total onsite energy needs. Where a natural gas or diesel-powered generator might only capture 45% to 50% of the energy available in its natural gas fuel for use as electricity, making use of the associated heat raises its operational efficiency as high as 80%.

To address the shortfalls of such all-eggs-inone-basket dependency, project developers might want to, instead, consider a hybrid approach to onsite-energy design, one that brings together more than a single resource or addresses multiple energy needs simultaneously. In this way, the energy generated locally could potentially be useful both day and night, and related capital investments could be amortized across multiple business operations and not simply applied against a monthly electricity bill.

Because capturing the full benefits of CHP means making the most of the waste heat, systems generally are sized to a facility’s heat load, rather than electrical demand. Previously, economies of scale meant such applications were primarily large hospitals or industrial plants. As U.S. manufacturing has slowed, so has the CHP market, which has stagnated for the last decade. The nation’s current combined CHP and fuel cell (a similar technology) capacity is still significant, though, at 84 gigawatts (GW).

Investigators in university laboratories and venture-backed startups are actively pursuing hybridized systems, including designs linking PV panels to hydrogen fuel cells, or fuel cells to microturbines. Here we present three options now at, or near to commercialization, for looking beyond the standalone solar array.

32 

SHARING THE HEAT

Cogen captures heat that otherwise would be wasted, making it a highly efficient means for meeting on-site energy needs.

Combined Heat and Power The most fully developed hybrid approach to meeting facility-wide energy needs is combined heat and power (CHP), also called “cogeneration,” or “cogen,” for short. This technology involves capturing the waste heat from an onsite generator set for use in other applications, such as process heat for a manufacturing plant or hot water for a college campus.

30 | 11.16 | NET ZERO BUILDINGS

1611NZBPWR.indd 30

www.nzbmagazine.com

11/3/16 17:02

Profile for Construction Business Media

Net Zero Buildings - November 2016  

Highlighting the Path Toward Net Zero Building Design.

Net Zero Buildings - November 2016  

Highlighting the Path Toward Net Zero Building Design.