Issuu on Google+

Clayton Madrid

Portfolio // 03.01.14


R

the sandLot // Oceano, CA

en

es

ie

nc

e

to

S

Pa

rk

T

Dr

t

at

io

le from the site

r

Public

Ai

r a n si

Legend::Resource Map

l

Ave

Re

The projected completion date for the sandLot is September 1st, 2014.

Pier

c r e

The project contains 3 units of varying size and layout to accomodate a fluxuating market of tourists, travellers, local recreation and extended stay.

tai

Due to the sites location, review by the Coastal Commission was required. Working closely with the local bodies and understanding the aim of the Coastal Commission, the project was successfully moved through all permiting processes in record time. Understanding the severe strain that structures impose on the local landscape and global resources, the owner requested a design that met and exceeded LEED standards. The project is currently in consideration as a LEED Gold project.

Re

The project was constrained by many local and state wide regulations. The sandLot is centrally located within protected landscapes; State Parks to the North and Oceano Dunes Park to the South. Many design considerations were derived from the site and its context. To respect the boardering State Park and its ESHA protected species of native plants, large setbacks were incorporated to maximize the area of permeable surfaces and lighten the footprint consumed by the architecture. The permeable surfaces allow the native plant life to bleed through the site, below grade as existing systems and above grade as planted native sea grass.

< 1/4 mile from the site

re

The sandLot has remained undeveloped for the existence of its designation as lots 23 and 24 by the county of San Luis Obispo. The sandLot was the name given to this undeveloped site for its natural scape and relationship to the dunes. Once aquired, the owner sought schematic design for vacation rentals as this is a desirable development in the local market.


Hwy lo

1

ng Dr

Norswi Per

ng shi

Dr

Mendel Dr


We traveled to Marfa, TX for an extended stay to gain an understanding of its dynamic culture and vast landscapes. Marfaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s current state of being is a blend of generational families derived from an evolved freight headquarters and a an evergrowing art scene. spawned from the residence of minimalist artist, Donald Judd. The juxtaposition of these two cultures has become a rich blend of local heritage and a fluctuating population of creative outsiders. The project directive was to develop a drive-in movie theatre informed by MOSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; current proposal. A tower developed to absorb the influx of traveling persons and reduce their footprint by elevating them from the ground. Festivels and times of travel have been known to double the size of the towns population. The architecture rehabilitates the surrounding sports field and rodeo ring by extending out with accomadating structures and supportive screens. The base of the tower serves as a temporary vehicular repository for travellers and film spectators. The screen has been placed on a shallow incline in the distant field as to redirect the viewers gaze back down to the horizon and create studium style seating. The dilapitaed state of the surrounding sports arenas and solar orientation provided guidence in the generation of the towers fenestration. The spherical volumes are a continuing study of non-orthogonal spaces and how the formations stem from human interaction and the break down of habitual tenedencies.

was


fabrication_of_frame.s 4"x4" WOOD COLUMN, TYP.

Clayton A Madrid

12"x12"x1'-6" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING

soapHaus // San Diego, CA

24"x18" DEEP FOUNDATION

1815-B Main St San Diego, CA 92110 clayton.madrid@gmail.com

S101 4x 4 44

AC

4

2

AC

44

5

L = 10' - 0"

4x 4 44

AC

3

AC

44

3

4

5" STEP UP

3 3.5" X 9.25" PARALLAM BEAM

BEAM(S) PER PLAN

L = 17' - 0"

2 X 12 RAFTERS @ 16" O.C., TYP

SIMPSON AC OR ACE (AS APPLICABLE) EA. SIDE, BEAM TO POST

9 4 AC x4 E4 4

BEAM TO POST 3/4" = 1'-0"

1

3

FOUNDATION PLAN // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 1 1/4" = 1'-0"

2x STUDS @ 16" O.C.

2x STUDS @ 16" O.C.

SHEAR PANEL PER PLAN

SHEAR PANEL PER PLAN

2x OR 3x P.T. PLATE w/ A.B.'s FIRST LEVEL // PER S.W. SCHED. Ground Floor SINGLE STORY 0' - 6" #4 x15" DOWELS @ 24" O.C. CONSTRUCTION w/ SIMPSON SET-XP ADHESIVE 0' - 0"

B.N.

3"

1' - 10" MIN.

6"

A

2x OR 3x P.T. PLATE w/ A.B.'s PER S.W. SCHED. FIRST LEVEL // Ground Floor SINGLE STORY 0' - 6" #4 x15" DOWELS @ 24" O.C. CONSTRUCTION w/ SIMPSON SET-XP ADHESIVE 0' - 0"

(E) CONC. SLAB

(E) CONC. SLAB

(N) CONC. FOOTING w/ (2) #4 TOP & BOTTOM w/ (2) #3 VERT TIES @ 24" O.C.

(N) CONC. FOOTING w/ (2) #4 TOP & BOTTOM w/ (2) #3 VERT TIES @ 24" O.C.

1' - 0"

C 7

SHEAR WALL FTG. 3/4" = 1'-0"

2

8

T.O. Wall 8' - 8" A35 EA. SIDE EA. JOIST

6"

A35 @ 16" O.C. TO 2x BLK'G.

CONC. SLAB-ON-GRADE

3"

PROPERTY LINE #4 REBAR, TYP.

3"

3"

DETAIL - WALL TO SLAB, TYP 3/4" = 1'-0"

3"

3"

6" CONC FIRST LEVEL // SLAB-ON-GRADE Ground Floor #3 @ 12" O.C. E.W. SINGLEw/ STORY 0' -BARS 6" CONSTRUCTION 0' - 0"

DETAIL - WALL TO CURB, TYP 3/4" = 1'-0"

Date 4/19/13 7/8/13

Jessica Gulati

3"

PAD FOOTING w/ #4 @ 6" O.C. EA. WAY

6

STAND-OFF POST BASE 3/4" = 1'-0"

Description

Shear Strength lb./ft.

Top Plate to Blk'g Nailing Req'd

3635 30TH ST. SAN DIEGO, CA 92104

Sill Plate Conn. To Ftg. w/ 5/8"x 24" A.B. Spacing

To 2x BLK'g U.N.O.

#1

15/32" Structural I Plywood with 8d nails at 6" o/c at edges and 12" o/c field.

280

LTP4 @ 24" o/c

36" (in 2x SILL Plate)

16d @ 6" o/c Staggered

#2

15/32" Structural I, 5 PLY Plywood with 8d nails at 6" o/c at edges and 12" o/c field.

340

LTP4 @ 21" o/c

24" (in 3x SILL Plate)

1/4" SDS Screws @ 10" o/c

#3

15/32" Structural I, 5 PLY Plywood with 8d nails at 4" o/c at edges and 12" o/c field.

430

LTP4 @ 16" o/c

18" (in 3x SILL Plate)

1/4" SDS Screws @ 8" o/c

#4

15/32" Structural I, 5 PLY Plywood with 10d nails at 4" o/c at edges and 12" o/c field.

550

LTP4 @ 12" o/c

16" (in 3x SILL Plate)

1/4" SDS Screws @ 8" o/c

#5

15/32" Structural I, 5 PLY Plywood with 10d nails at 2" o/c at edges and 12" o/c field.

870

LTP4 @ 6" o/c

6" (in 3x SILL Plate)

1/4" SDS Screws @ 4" o/c (in 3x BLK'g)

2' - 0"

2' - 0" 5

#

STAND-OFF POST BASE

2x4 SILL PLATE w/ ANCHORS @ 32" O.C.

1' - 3"

4

4x6 POST PER PLAN 1"

6" STEMWALL FIRST LEVEL // Ground Floor SINGLE STORY 0' - 6" CONSTRUCTION 0' - 0"

#4 REBAR, TYP.

FRAMED WALL WITH INSULATION

DETAIL - WALL TO ROOF, TYP 3/4" = 1'-0"

WOOD-FRAMED WALL w/ INSULATION

DRAWINGS NOT VALID WITHOUT WET INK SIGNATURE

Description

ROOF FRAMING PLAN // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 1/4" = 1'-0"

Shear Wall Schedule 2010 California Building Code

3"

B.N.

2x6 P.T. PLATE w/ A.B.'s @ 32" O.C.

S L TE T RUC T URA R O IF OF CAL

"I Gagan P. Singh Bains do hereby certify that the structure(s) or modification to existing structure(s) shown on these plans do not require Federal Aviation Administration notification because per Section 77.15(a) of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations CFR Part 77, notification is not required."

Mark

1' - 6"

ROOF // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 9' - 7"

No. 4482 A

PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL PLAN CHECK RE-SUBMITTAL

_____________________________________________ Gagan P. Singh Bains

1 #3 REBAR @ 16" O.C. CMU WALL w/ FILLED CORE & ALTERNATING REBAR

C

O F E S S I ON AL P. S I NGH B A

SHEAR WALL FTG.1 3/4" = 1'-0"

4

WOOD-FRAMED WALL w/ EXT. LAP SIDING

2

B

5 A103

AB's OF 880# CAPACITY

C

No.

AB's OF 1000# CAPACITY

B

9

AN

Exp. 6/30/14 ST

S101

A

4

4 4x 44 E AC

9 S101

5

PR

NE ER

POST PER PLAN

4

D

GI EN S IN

S101

ER GA E G

9 S101

EXISTING NON-PERMITTED STRUCTURE

2 X 4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C., TYP. 9 S101

R EG I S T

4 X12 DOUGLAS FIR BEAM

27"x27"x18" DEEP FOUNDATION

8

SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION

12' - 4 3/4"

3

4x

3

S101 4x

#3 REBAR, TYP.

2

A103

S101

6" THICK SLAB w/ #3 REBAR E.W. @ 12" O.C. OVER 4" SAND OVER 4" CRUSHED BASE w/ VAPOR BARRIER IN MIDDLE OF THE SAND

2"x8" PTDF SILL PLATE WITH ANCHORS AT 32" O.C.

1

2X8 FASCIA, TYP

8" STEM WALL

The system for the creation of space via a digital interface (applet) is based on computational agency. The use of au-tonomous agents designed to take decisions

9

3.5" X 9.25" PARALLAM BEAM

15"x18"DEEP FOUNDATION

1/2" CFB BEHIND 2"x8" DOUGLAS FIR UNDER LIGHT GAUGE FLASHING

9

2

4" SLAB

This platform for design can be seen as the generation of software, developed for specific conditions related to the needs and wants of the user. I have begun the development of an applet that generates space based on specific site and societal conditions. The creation of this applet provided a tool in which I was able to rethink the typical residential unit through the active manipulation of design parameters and constraints.

5

STRUCTURE Project Number Date Drawn By Checked By

Scale

S101

001 07.08.13 CAM --

As indicated

7/2/2013 2:02:24 PM

U8 6 4x

4

L = 6' - 0"

A103

3.5" X 9.25" PARALLAM BEAM

S101

9 S101

CLIENT HAS ENGAGED IN A CONTRACT WITH ARC ENGINEERING, EITHER IN VERBAL OR WRITTEN FORM. CLIENT ENSURES THAT NO CHANGE OR ALTERATION OF ANY KIND SHALL BE MADE TO THESE DRAWINGS, AT ANY TIME, WHETHER DURING DESIGN, PLAN CHECK, RECHECK, DURING OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CLIENT RELEASES ARC ENGINEERING FROM ALL DAMAGES, FINES OR FEES INCURRED BY CHANGES MADE WITHOUT CONSENT OF ARC ENGINEERING.

HD

1

18' - 4 3/4"

6" SLAB ON GRADE

9 S101

ARC ENGINEERING DOES ASSERT ITS RIGHT TO KEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL COPYRIGHTS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS TO ALL DRAWINGS, REPRESENTATIONS, IDEAS, DETAILS, NOTES, AND SPECIFICATIONS, EITHER COPIES OR ORIGINALS THEREOF, THAT MAY BE INCORPORATED INTO THIS DESIGN. ARC ENGINEERING DOES NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR ANY COPIES OF SAID COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS, DRAWINGS, REPRESENTATIONS, IDEAS, DETAILS, NOTES, AND SPECIFICATIONS, EITHER ORIGINAL OR COPIES THEREOF, TO BE MADE, COPIED, OR ALTERED BY ANY PERSON, BUSINESS, OR CORPORATION WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ARC ENGINEERING.

S101

IA

S101

N

S101

7 5/8" CMU BLOCK WALL WITH #4 VERTICAL REBAR AT 16"O.C. AND #3 HORRIZONTAL REBAR EVERY OTHER COURSE

4 AC x6 E4 4

7

4 AC x6 E4 4

6

U8 6 4x

24"x24"x18" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING WITH REBAR 6" 0.C. , TYP.

6

HD

This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of cus-tomizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding dy-namic results. The mass-customization of habitable space must be directly influenced by user input and it is the role of the designer to develop a platform in which the general public can intuitively generate personalized space.


2x2 BALUSTERS (STUD-GRADE) AT SPACING TO NOT PASS A 4-3/8" SPHERE; 2x2 AT EACH EDGE OF PANEL FASTENED TO POST w/ 1/4" x 3" COURSE-THREAD SCREWS @ 6" O.C.

42" MIN.

42" AT DECK

34" TO 38" AT STAIR

3' - 9 1/2"

6" CONCRETE SLAB

2x2 BALUSTERS (STUD-GRADE) AT SPACING TO NOT PASS A 4-3/8" SPHERE; 2x2 AT EACH EDGE OF PANEL FASTENED TO POST w/ 1/4" x 3" COURSE-THREAD SCREWS @ 6" O.C.

Clayton A Madrid 1815-B Main St San Diego, CA 92110

ROOF DECK

STAIR TREAD

clayton.madrid@gmail.com

1x4 EA. SIDE 1x4 EA. SIDE

1

(3) 2"x12" WOOD STRINGERS 4x4 #1 D.F. GUARDRAIL POST w/ (2) 1/2"Ø LAG-SCREWS

6"

6"

4x4 #1 D.F. GUARDRAIL POST w/ (2) 1/2"Ø LAG-SCREWS

2 A103

RAFTER JOISTS PER PLAN w/ HANGERS TO BEAM BEAM PER PLAN 2x STRINGER (#2 D.F. OR BETTER)

8

DECK GUARDRAIL SECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

14' - 8"

3' - 2" CLR (MIN. 36")

ROOF // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 9' - 7"

TYP. 2

T.O. Wall 8' - 8"

A103

6"

STRINGER HAS 0' - 1/4" STAND OFF FROM MASONRY WALL TO PREVENT ABSORBTION OF MOISTURE/ DETERIATION OF WOOD. 4-1/4" MAX.

2" X 8" WOOD CARRIAGES

1/4"

4x4 POST, TYP.

34" TO 38"

1

DN

4x4 GUARDRAIL POST w/ (2) 1/2Ø M.B.'s THRU OUTSIDE STRINGER GSM FLASHING WATERPROOF DECKING MAT'L, TYP. AT TREAD & RISER

PRECAST CONC. PIER w/ EMBEDDED STL STRAP ANCHOR

2 A103

4" CONCRETE SLAB

6

FIRST LEVEL // Ground Floor SINGLE STORY 0' - 6" CONSTRUCTION 0' - 0"

S102

B 1

C

PLAN // STAIRS 1/2" = 1'-0"

No. 6

SECTION - STRINGER WALL SPACING 3" = 1'-0"

3

PR AN

O

P

N

Exp ST

2 S102

D

ER GA E G

STAIR GUARDRAIL SECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

R EG I S T

7

SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION

2"X6" WOOD HANDRAIL

2" MIN.

EXISTING NON-PERMITTED STRUCTURE

2" MIN.

A

S TE TR OF

DRAWINGS NOT VALID

Description PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL PLAN CHECK RE-SUBMITTAL

WEST ELEVATION - STAIRS 1/2" = 1'-0"

1

1

2 A103

5 S102

4-1/4" MAX.

(MIN. 10")

T.O. Wall 8' - 8"

ROOF // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 9' - 7" CONT. RIM-JOIST FROM 2x12 2x SOLID BLK'G BTWN. STRINGERS

Jessica Gul

3' - 8"

7"

3/4" THICK PLYWOOD RISERS AND TREADS

3/8" DIA. ANCHOR BOLT SIMPSON A35 EA. STRINGER 2x4 P.T. SILL

ROOF // SINGLE STORY CONSTRUCTION 9' - 7"

11"

(MAX. 7.75")

1/2" THICK, NON-SLIP WEATHERPROOF PROTECTIVE COATING

T.O. Wall 8' - 8"

Ground Floor 0' - 6"

3635 30TH ST SAN DIEGO, CA 9

SIMPSON HU HANGER AT EACH STRINGER WOOD-FRAMED WALL 2x STRINGERS 6 S102

FIRST LEVEL // Ground Floor SINGLE STORY

STAIR DETA


We took a very organic approach to solving the problem of the house. We chose an animal, specifically a wild animal, that we then would use to guide the design of our houses. I chose a Leopard and specifically a Melanistic Leopard. The project began with examining the animal and learning everything that we could, such as its structural system, organs, habitat, and daily life. Once we fully understood the animal, we then moved forward and began to take our understanding of the animals characteristics to start developing a house. By taking this approach, it ensured that the final product would be tied closely to our individual animal.

UP

Elevator

Down

UP

UP

UP

My overall concept for this project was derived from the animal itself and its habitual functions. The program stems from the cats daily activities. The Leopard spends some time on the ground hunting but most of its time is spent in the trees, elevated away from the ground. This idea of being elevated off the ground is the driving force behind my program concept and design. Once the program design was established, I looked to the animals physical structure as a means of constructing my house. The overall structure of the house is based exclusively on the bone structure of the animal. Unnecessary structural elements were omitted while the necessary were prominently designed.

UP

OUTDOOR AREA

Elevator

UP

SHOP

BEDROOM AREA UP

Elevator UP

N

UP

UP

UP

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN

UP

UP

BALCONY

BALCONY

UP


We traveled to Marfa, TX for an extended stay to gain an understanding of its dynamic culture and vast landscapes. Marfaâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s current state of being is a blend of generational families derived from an evolved freight headquarters and a an evergrowing art scene. spawned from the residence of minimalist artist, Donald Judd. The juxtaposition of these two cultures has become a rich blend of local heritage and a fluctuating population of creative outsiders. The project directive was to develop a drive-in movie theatre informed by MOSâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; current proposal. A tower was developed to absorb the influx of traveling persons and reduce their footprint by elevating them from the ground. Festivels and times of travel have been known to double the size of the towns population. The architecture rehabilitates the surrounding sports field and rodeo ring by extending out with accomadating structures and supportive screens. The base of the tower serves as a temporary vehicular repository for travellers and film spectators. The screen has been placed on a shallow incline in the distant field as to redirect the viewers gaze back down to the horizon and create studium style seating. The dilapitaed state of the surrounding sports


Adaptive Computational Ecologies

RULES 1. If d > X, respawn 2. More controlled agents, interior ribbing to define surface/ members.

3. Agents controlled by shell thickness; add more structure to thin areas.

if (x > y && < z){; //place repeller in mi //form } else{ //place repeller at to }

This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of cus-tomizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding dy-namic results. The mass-customization of habitable

//resulting agent trails

agent removes faces acc color range of solar an

repellars placed accordi solar analysis

Integrated Furniture: A piece of furniture is no longer a stand-alone object, it has been


Clayton A Madrid

Clayton A Madrid

GMO NSA+D//thesis

iddle of

op of form

s

cording to nalysis

RULES

ing to

ft

All-terrain 3D Printer

90 ft

Travel in Z -

90

0

11

ft 5

10

Travel in X -

ft

Steel Holder Gantry System Concrete Sprayer

Fine Adjustment/ Travel in Z Direction

Robotic Arms

Travel in Y -

Utilities Steel

Sub - Gantry System

Extrusion Nozzle Additional Requirements: Concrete Pump Truck

RULES

Concrete Supply/ Trucks

Distance X, to Allow for Interior Generation

Auger

Additional Structural Ribbing to Compensate for Thin Shell

Structural/ Spatial Generation Agent Spawn Point Repeller

Concrete

5.5â&#x20AC;&#x2122;

Self - Leveling/ Hydraulic


thesis // presentationStand This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of cus-tomizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding dynamic results. The masscustomization of habitable space must be directly influenced by user input and it is the role of the designer to develop a platform in which the general public can intuitively generate personalized space. This platform for design can be seen as the generation of software, developed for specific conditions related to the needs and wants of


Hapa Yoga // Lockers This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of customizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding


servingTray

This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of cus-tomizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding dy-namic results. The mass-customization of habitable space must be directly influenced by user input and it is the role of the designer to develop a platform in which the general public can intuitively generate personalized space. This platform for design can be seen as the generation of software, developed for specific conditions related to the needs and wants of the user. I have begun the development of an applet that generates space based on specific site and societal conditions. The creation of this applet provided a tool in which I was able to rethink the typical residential unit through the active manipulation of design parameters and constraints. The system for the creation of space via a digital interface (applet) is based on computational agency. The use of


lampShades 0.1

This thesis questions the role of designers in the future and how we might begin to rethink the approach to design of habitable spaces in an environment of emerging complexities. To meet the demands of the public for the creation of cus-tomizable space, the designer must seek out alternative methods of process which have the potential of yielding dy-namic results. The mass-customization of habitable space must be directly influenced by user input and it is the role of the designer to develop a platform in which the general public can intuitively generate personalized space. This platform for design can be seen as the generation of software, developed for specific conditions related to the needs and wants of the user. I have begun the development of an


firmportfo_032414_sd1