Asian Sanitation Data Book 2008: Achieving Sanitation for All

Page 89

Part III: City Sanitation Profile

Kathmandu, Nepal

77

For All Surveyed Cities and Municipalities

Water Supply Facility

Unit

City Value

Top Value

Top Quartile

Range

Average

% % % % % % % lpcd lpcd % % %

100 0 0 0 0 0 40 90 270.9 0 100 0

100.00 46.65 60.00 96.41 45.52 35.00 80.00 160.00 1,371.50 100.00 100.00 100.00

67.10 11.43 37.61 20.00 0.10 0.02 40.00 135.00 197.40 100.00 100.00 0

3.59–100.00 (27) 0.00–46.65 (25) 0.04–60.00 (26) 0.00–96.41 (25) 0.00–45.52 (26) 0.00–35.00 (26) 0–80 (18) 40–160 (20) 14.0–1,371.5(22) 100.0 (22) 0–100 (22) 0–100 (22)

50.50 7.80 16.80 14.50 5.98 2.80 20.70 97.10 11.80 49.80 45.00 5.30

Unit

City Value

Top Value

Top Quartile

Range

Average

National Government Local Government State-Owned Utility

# # #

2 2 –

6 4 2

2 2 1

1–6 (5) 1–4 (21) 1–2 (11)

2.8 1.7 1.3

Water Utility Enterprise Nongovernment Organization

# # #

– – –

2

2 – –

2–2 (1) – (0) – (0)

2.0

Total Personnel (per 10,000 pop’n) Planning and Monitoring Construction Operations and Maintenance

# % % %

0.46 – – –

100.77 43.70

20.56 43.7 – 100

0.46–100.77 (17) 12.7–43.70 (4) 0 76.60–100.00 (4)

14.9 23.9 0 87.1

Total Personnel (per 10,000 pop’n) Operations and Maintenance

# %

– –

30.96

30.96 –

30.96 (1) – (0)

30.96 –

Unit

City Value

Range

Average

# #

4 –

year year

Household Water Supply Source Central Water Supply–Individual Central Water Supply–Communal Borehole Protected Spring/Well Rainwater Water Vendor Population Buying Bottled Water Average Water Consumption Water Treatment Facilities Local Government National Government Private Concessionaire

Organizational Arrangement Institutions Involved in Sanitation Public Sector

Private Sector

Number of Personnel Public Sector

100

Private Sector

Legal Framework

Top Value

Top Quartile

Legal Mandate of Sanitation Number of Laws on Sanitation National Local Year Enacted Oldest Latest Sanitation Service Charges Law on Collecting Fees Year Enacted

4 3

3 1

1987 1999

2007 2007

2000 2005

1947–2007 (23) 1956–2007 (23)

Y/N year

Y 1990

17 2007

2003

17 (25) 1956–2007 (17)

Unit

City Value

Top Quartile

Range

Y/N year

N –

11 2007

2006

11–27 2006–2007 (2)

2006

Will Prepare Sanitation Plan Preparation Year Estimated Cost Amount per Capita Source of Fund Major Sanitation Problem

Y/N year $ $/capita list list

2009 395 762.7

2008 250 477.6

2008–2009 (8) 0.03–395.00 (7) 0.6–762.7 (7)

2008 101.25 185.50

Future Programs/Projects Funding Amount Funding Source

list $/capita list

– – – – – Wastewater directly discharged into the river. – – –

1.79

1.79

0.96–1.79 (2)

Planning

Top Value

1–4 (18) 1–3 (15)

1.9 1.2 1985 1993

1990

Average

Strategic Sanitation Plan Existing Sanitation Plan With Sanitation Plan When Prepared New Sanitation Plan

Sanitation Problem

1.37

Y = yes, N = no, lcpd = liters per capita per day, pop’n = population. Note: Value in ( ) is the number of cities and municipalities with data. "–" means data not available.

9th proof_Citynet Sanitation Dat77 77

10/1/2009 3:26:09 PM


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.