Social Network: Tech Bubble 2.0? By Dian L. Chu, EconForecast Talk about another internet bubble. New York Times broke the news on Jan. 2 that Facebook, the social network website, was able to get $500 million in funding-$450 million from Goldman Sachs and $50 million from Digital Sky Technologies, a Russian investment firm that has already pumped about half a billion dollars into Facebook. But the real eye popping fact is that this latest deal values Facebook at $50 billion. That’s right, $50 billion, which is more than the current market cap of Time Warner, Baidu, Yahoo, and almost twice that of Dell, Inc. Facebook P/E Multiple = 100+ Even though Facebook is not publicly traded, the company has raise about $850 million to date in total through a secondary market. Facebook’s value reportedly has roughly tripled over the last year--not bad for a company that’s only been in business for six years. Facebook does not disclose its financials, but its 2009 revenue is estimated to be around $800 million. Most recently, analysts figure the company could bring in as much as $2 billion in revenue annually. So, if we take the $2 billion in revenue, the $50 billion new valuation, and assuming a 25% net margin (which is very generous), Facebook’s P/E multiple is an astonishing 100x..or even more, dwarfing even the high flyer Baidu’s PE ratio of 83 (one of the reasons I see BIDU facing somedownside risks in 2011.) For comparison purpose, Google’s PE is around 24, close to that of Apple’s 22.
Goldman Sachs = Froth Then, whenever there’s an institution player as big as Goldman Sachs wheeling and dealing, you know most likely something frothy is brewing (Well, the same thing could be said about gold ATM machines popping up everywhere.) NYT noted Goldman Sachs has taken a 1% stake in Facebook, and most likely is aiming to get the lucrative underwriting and advisory fees in a future IPO. In addition, Goldman also devised an elaborate plan to create a “special purpose vehicle” for its rich clients to invest in Facebook. The grand purpose is that this vehicle, no matter how many investors are in the “pool”, is to be considered as one investor, so to stay below the threshold of an SEC financial disclosure rule. Although there’s no indication it would go as planned, but if anyone could make this work, it would have to be Goldman Sachs. Suddenly, Coupon Clipping Is In! Another sign of a bubble is that Groupon, a two-year old "social coupon" site that’s yet to hit $500 million dollars in revenue, had recently rejected a $6 billion takeover bid from Google. However, you can’t fault Groupon for turning Google down. MarketWatch reported that bids for Groupon have risen 254% from $36 a share in August, to as much as $127.50 a share on Dec. 30. And according to TechCrunch, Groupon is in the process of raising as much as $950 million, at a valuation that could be as high as $7.8 billion. Separately, LivingSocial, a website similar to Groupon, just closed a massive round of financing totaling $183 million, including $175 million from Amazon. Both Facebook and Groupon are expected to issue IPOs in 2012, while Twitter, Zynga and LinkedIn are three other social sites that investors are
anxiously waiting for their IPOs. China’s Social IPO Rush The social network technology enthusiasm has not gone unnoticed. Reutersnoted that China's largest social networking company--Oak Pacific Interactive-- hired Credit Suisse Group AG and Deutsche Bank AG to underwrite its IPO in the United States slated for the first half of 2011....among a few other Chinese Facebook clones looking to list in the U.S. Oak Pacific owns China's largest online social networking site Renren, that's similar to Facebook, and Nuomi, which is like Groupon. Cash Out Ahead of The Herd Meanwhile, companies in the U.S. and Europe have more than $1.5 trillion sitting on their respective balance sheets, and there’s also an improvement in the market for venture-backed IPOs. For now, it seems many of these companies are willing to throw money at anything related to social networking. From that perspective, Facebook probably would be wise go to IPO sooner rather than later before the mood turns sour, and ahead of the social IPO herd diverting available capital. Zuckerburg probably could benefit from consulting Mark Cuban on the art of cashing out using Cuban’s broadcast.com / Yahoo deal as an example. A Social Tech Bubble? If history is any indication, it seems most of the elements that shaped the 2000 dot com bubble are present and accounted for in the current environment, including but not limited to, rapidly increasing valuation, market over-confidence and speculation, and excess liquidity.
So, could Facebook et al end up being a fad like Delicious? Only time will tell. Nonetheless, Microsoft probably won't worry that much, since the latest Goldman deal just more than tripled the value of its holdings in Facebook when the company paid $240 million for a 1.6% stake in 2007.
DISCLAIMER DO NOT BASE ANY INVESTMENT DECISION UPON ANY MATERIALS FOUND ON THIS WEBSITE OR IN ONE OF OUR NEWSLETTERS. We are not registered as a securities broker-dealer or an investment advisor either within the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the â€œSECâ€?) or with any state securities regulatory authority. We are neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice. The information contained on our website or in any of our newsletters should be viewed as commercial advertisement and is not intended to be investment advice. Any information found on our website, or in any of our newsletters is not provided to any particular individual with a view toward their individual circumstances. The information contained on our website, and in any newsletter we distribute, is not an offer to buy or sell securities. We distribute opinions, comments, and information free of charge exclusively to individuals who wish to receive them. Our newsletter and website have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used as a complete source of information on any particular company. An individual should never invest in the securities of any of the companies profiled based solely on information contained in our report. Individuals should assume that all information contained on our website or in one of our newsletters about profiled companies is not trustworthy unless verified by their own independent research. Any individual who chooses to invest in any securities should do so with caution. Investing in securities is speculative and carries a high degree of risk; you may lose some or all of the
money that is invested. Always research your own investments and consult with a registered investment adviser or licensed stock broker before investing. This newsletter is a paid advertisement and is neither an offer nor recommendation to buy or sell any security. We hold no investment licenses and are thus neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice. The content in this report or email is not provided to any individual with a view toward their individual circumstances. ChartPoppers.com is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seo Freisin, Inc.. While Seo Freisin has not been compensated for the distribution of this particular email, any future email regarding a specific company will be the result of an advertising and promotional campaign for which Seo Freisin, Inc. receives compensation. This compensation constitutes a conflict of interest as to our ability to remain objective in our communication regarding the profiled company. Because of this conflict, individuals are strongly encouraged to not use this newsletter as the basis for any investment decision. Seo Freisin and its affiliates currently hold no shares in the profiled company. Seo Freisin, Inc., and/or its affiliates will hold, buy, and sell securities in the companies profiled. When compensated in shares, all readers should be aware that it is our policy to liquidate all shares immediately. We reserve the right to buy or sell the shares of any the companies mentioned in any materials we produce at any time. This compensation constitues a conflict of interest as to our ability to remain objective in our communication regarding the profiled companies. Information contained in our report will contain “forward looking statements” as defined under section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Subscribers are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon these forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties outside of our control that could cause actual operations or results to differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that could affect performance include, but are not limited to, those factors that are discussed in each profiled company’s most recent reports or registration statements filed with the SEC. You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward looking statements included in the report and not place undue reliance upon such statements. We are committed to providing factual information on the companies that are profiled. However, we do not provide any assurance asto the accuracy or completeness of the information provided, including information regarding a profiled company’s plans or ability to effect any planned or proposed actions. We have no first-hand knowledge of any profiled company’s operations and thereforecannot comment on their capabilities, intent, resources, nor experience and we make no attempt to do so. Statistical information, dollar amounts, and market size data was provided by the subject company and related sources which we believe to be reliable. To the fullest extent of the law, we will not be liable to any person or entity for the quality, accuracy, completeness, reliability, or timeliness of the information provided in this report, or for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, special or punitive damages that may arise out of the use of information we provide to any person or entity (including, but not limited to, lost profits, loss opportunities, trading losses, and damages that may result from any inaccuracy or incompleteness of this information).
Published on Jan 4, 2011