Using the expression of the Italian philosopher Gianni Vattimo, communication contemporary "human sciences" It is also the "media" on one side which allows and encourages its wide dissemination and use, for the other, is as an essential feature of its existence, extension and dissemination. Today's society is the realization of the modern utopia of the extension and diffusion of knowledge of man by man, without consideration of how the mental alienation enacted, social justice and self-transparency. Rather, this knowledge of the humanities terms constitute a target for legitimizing modes of behavior, institutions, modes of thinking, customs and beliefs, which operate on behalf of humanity at all costs, they end up dragging its foundations: ".. Everything real is rational, every rational is real: Auschwitz refutes speculative doctrine. At least that, crime is real, is not rational. All proletarian is communist, everything communist proletarian Berlin 1953, Budapest 1956, Czechoslovakia 1968, Poland 1980 (...) refute the doctrine of historical materialism. Workers rebel against the party. All democratic is by the people and for the people and vice versa: the crisis of 1911, 1929 refutes the doctrine of economic liberalism and the crisis of 1974-1979 refute this doctrine poskeinesianas amendments "7 The university is the place where it was originally believed to place the production, reproduction and circulation of knowledge socially valid. And likewise, the integral axiological training (meaning discipline) of citizens. The University, is an example of dissociation and embodiment of human speech (comprehensive education, social development, personal fulfillment, autonomy) and disciplinary practices of control and surveillance (routinization of work and attendance, review). It assists the privilege of primary relationships (face to face contact between teachers and students), classroom extended to the satisfaction of the eye and regular reviews of ongoing inspection. What a Colombian philosopher called pedagogy of moods and smells, while extending their own networks carelessly electronic information, channels of cable television systems, cellular telephony and multimodal communication systems. The question is, what is the society that the University has in mind? Is that image corresponds with the features of contemporary society? Faced with a fundamental teaching strategy considered as the functional division between theory and practice, I am constantly warning the incompetence of the students to work in open cultural contexts (eg street, neighborhood, neighborhood, town, city) and the trend to use monitoring and surveillance mechanisms inoperative as punishment, blackmail, coercion, manipulation. They feel confused by warning that the pedagogic device used in the University, is useless in other contexts.
57