Citizens Guide Wastewater

Page 24

OPTION 3B: KEY METRICS AND CONSIDERATIONS Estimated Capital Costs

$1.178 billion

Estimated Operating Costs by 2030

$24 million

Estimated Annual Resource Income (heat, water) by 2030

Up to $3.8 million

Water Quality after Treatment for Core Area

100% tertiary at Colwood. 90% secondary, 10% tertiary for water reuse at Rock Bay & Esquimalt Nation

Estimated Length of New Pipes Required

54.0 km

Possible Number of Heat Recovery Systems

3

Possible Number of Water Re-use Systems

3

Carbon and Energy Footprint Rank

6th lowest footprint overall

BENEFITS:

IMPLICATIONS:

• Exceeds government regulations with a higher level of treatment than 3 plant secondary.

• The Colwood and Langford plants require new infrastructure and a new outfall.

• Wate re-use and heat resuse systems at all three facilities.

• Second to last carbon and energy ranking due to factors like infrastructure.

• Tied for second highest projected resource income from heat and water reuse.

For more detailed information, including a breakdown of costs and deeper technical analysis, please see the technical report: www.CoreAreaWastewater.ca CITIZENS’ GUIDE to Wastewater Alternatives January – February 2016

24


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.