THROW THEM A BONE
Scaling the Impact of the People at the Heart of the Loose Dog Problem
Human-Centered Design Studio Spring, 2018
AUTHORS Caleb Kyle Ariel Martin Raeâ€™Van Parson Laura Reed Michaela Rollins
THROW THEM A BONE Scaling the Impact of the People at the Heart of the Loose Dog Problem
Table of Contents
Introduction Human-Centered Design ..........................................................................................6 The Problem ..............................................................................................................10 Unconfined Dog Categories ...................................................................................12 Partners ......................................................................................................................14 Project Timeline .......................................................................................................15 Research Challenge .................................................................................................16 Current Outreach Efforts .......................................................................................18 Research Secondary Research .............................................................................................. 22 Research Methods ................................................................................................... 24 What We Found ........................................................................................................27 Community Reactivist ............................................................................................ 28 Community Proactivist .......................................................................................... 34 Prototyping Prototyping Concepts ............................................................................................ 44 Prototype 1: Stronger Together Coalition ......................................................... 46 Refocus: Justina ........................................................................................................ 51 Justinaâ€™s Story ...........................................................................................................52 (Micro) Prototype 2: The Missy Trap ................................................................. 54 Iteration ..................................................................................................................... 56 Whatâ€™s Next? Paths to Improvement ............................................................................................ 64 Design Principles .................................................................................................... 66 Final Thoughts ......................................................................................................... 68 Team ........................................................................................................................... 70
A Creative Approach to Problem Solving
6 // Throw Them A Bone
Human-Centered Design is a proven methodology used to solve problems that resist solutions. The process starts with design research, which is about cultivating empathy with the audience that is being designed for through a series of research methods. Design research ends with making and testing a series of prototype ideas and eventually launching innovative prototypes and possible solutions out into the world. Designers start this process with no preconceived notion of a final product, but instead open themselves to wherever their research takes them. This means that the final solution could be a building, public policy, software, or take on any number of other forms. It is in this way that those who practice Human-Centered Design are able to bring truly innovative ideas into the world.
Throw Them A Bone // 7
8 // Throw ‘Them’ A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 9
Dealing with dogs roaming the streets has become a part of life for those who live in southern Dallas.
Dogs roaming the streets are a part of life for those
On April 16, 2018, almost two years after the death
who live in southern Dallas. The issue of loose dogs
of Antoinette Brown, another woman was violently
has existed for years, and until recently, few efforts
attacked by another pack of loose dogs two miles
were being carried out to counter the growing,
from the first attack. This woman was nearly killed,
long standing problem. On May 2, 2016, everything
and the pitbulls that attacked her belonged to the
changed. A woman named Antoinette Brown was
house across the street. The dogs had “been an
attacked and killed by a pack of loose dogs roaming
issue before,” according to neighbors.
the streets at night. Brown’s death brought attention to the issue, and illuminated the need for the City
Why, years later, does this continue to happen?
of Dallas to intervene. Two months after Brown’s
Loose dogs in southern Dallas are still very much
death, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) was
a problem, and many residents fear for their safety
engaged on behalf of the city of Dallas to evaluate
every day. Over several months of qualitative,
and provide recommendations regarding the loose
immersive research, we saw that the current efforts
dogs in Dallas. Their findings ultimately focused
being carried out since the first attack were not
on selecting the high impact areas that should be
targeting the root of the problem, but merely the
targeted for future efforts, and that more spay and
effects. Dallas officials and organizations tackling
neutering efforts were needed to slow the growing
the problem can learn a lot from the residents of
dog population. BCG found: There were almost
southern Dallas: the humans at the center of this
9,000 loose dogs in southern Dallas; Reported
problem, who are forced to live with it every day.
dog bites in Dallas were rising 15% annually from 2013–15; Bites from loose-owned dogs were
When it comes to defining the dogs that are
growing at 23%.”
continuously roaming southern Dallas, the words “loose,” stray,” and “feral” are often used. One may
BCG stated that the majority of Dallas Animal
think that loose, stray, and feral dogs are one in the
Services work (311 responses, field collection, and
same, but this is not the case. It is important to know
euthanasia) was reactive. They were responding to
the distinctions that exist between these types of
the symptoms of this complex issue. This woman’s
dogs when dealing with them.
untimely and widely publicized death put more pressure than ever on the city of Dallas to take more action.
10 // Throw Them A Bone
ANIMAL SERVICE WORK IS LOOSE-OWNED DOG BITES IN 2016
MAY 2, 2016
ANTOINETTE BROWN KILLED BY DOG PACK
APRIL 15, 2018
WOMAN ATTACKED BY NEIGHBORâ€™S DOGS
Throw Them A Bone // 11
Unconfined Dog Categories When defining the dogs that roam southern Dallas, the words “loose,” stray,” and “feral” are often used. Many think these dogs are one in the same— we discovered that this is not the case. It is important to know the distinctions that exist between these types of dogs when dealing with them.
12 // Throw Them A Bone
DOMESTICATED For the most part, a loose dog is an owned dog that is out roaming and has free-range; it can potentially be a runaway. Another term that is often used by law enforcement is “loose-owned.”
DOMESTICATED Stray dogs, potentially once lost or escaped, can be better defined as “habitually stray.”
FERAL This category of dogs have been born and raised in the wild. After generations without human interaction and companionship, the effects of domestication are lost.
Throw Them A Bone // 13
This semester, we partnered with the SPCA of Texas and the Communities Foundation of Texas.
Communities Foundation of Texas
The SPCA (Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
The Communities Foundation of Texas exists to
to Animals) is one of the leading animal welfare
connect compassionate philanthropists with worthy
agencies in the North Texas region, offering an array
causes. It does this by vetting a bevy of nonprofits,
of animal services and educational programs to the
educational institutions, and other organizations to
community that they serve. They provide animal
present to donors as causes worthy of their support.
adoption, rehabilitation, spaying and neutering
In doing so, they enhance the impact of both
surgeries, low cost vet care, and perform animal
philanthropists and non-profits in the Dallas area.
cruelty investigations. It is their mission to â€œprovide every animal exceptional care and a loving home.â€?
14 // Throw Them A Bone
PROJECT TIMELINE those ideas out into the field to test and refine.
of 12 weeks. We started with a short phase of
Throughout this whole process we maintained an
secondary research, spent weeks performing in-
empathetic focus, treating the residents of southern
the-field primary design research, and eventually
Dallas as collaborators and co-designers in finding
synthesized the data down to present major
the right solution. Through our research and
research findings at the midpoint of the project. In
iterative prototyping, we were able to communicate
the second phase we built on our research findings
powerful, actionable learnings to our partners that
to draft potential prototype ideas, and then took
we believe can impact the problem at hand.
April 30 Final Presentation
January 22 Project Introduction
March 5 Research Presentation
We carried out this project over the course
Pre-Prototyping & Ideation
Prototyping & Iteration Throw Them A Bone // 15
How might we improve pet ownership? There is a long history of loose, stray, and feral dogs roaming the streets of southern Dallas. These dogs can become aggressive toward people and other dogs, and are feared by the people living in these areas. Violent attacks are widely known, and people are forced to live with the reality that they could become a victim. Despite recent efforts to mitigate the issue, dog attacks are still occurring and residents still live with a habitual fear of dangerous dogs. How can we design a solution that affects real change in this area and truly improves pet ownership in southern Dallas?
16 // Throw Them A Bone
Focus: 75216 Our team focused on the dog-owner experience in the zip code of 75216. We created a series of preliminary research questions that were intended to guide our research. The questions we sought to answer were: What are the effects of the current outreach programs? What is the dog ownership experience? What is the infrastructure of 75216?
Throw Them A Bone // 17
CURRENT OUTREACH EFFORTS There is a discrepancy between the intended results and the actual effectiveness of animal welfare programs for the residents of 75216. We found that the current outreach efforts, such as spay/neuter campaigns and door-to-door education are only filling the needs of one group of people: the people who are willing and able to accept the services being offered. As a result, there is a significant population of dog-owners who are left untouched by these outside efforts. We recognize that the spay/neuter campaigns and door-to-door education are seeking to affect positive change. However, if the resources administered are only being offered in one particular way, then only those who are able to take advantage of them are benefitting. For that reason, a need may exist for more complex, high impact approaches to this issue. We then aimed to discover what other services, if any, could be offered, implemented, and brought to those who need them in order to improve this long persisting situation. As we conducted our research, we kept these thoughts in mind.
18 // Throw Them A Bone
SPCA mobile clinic where spay and neuter services are administered for residents free of charge.
Throw Them A Bone // 19
20 // Throw ‘Them’ A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 21
While Human-Centered Design emphasizes going out into the field to perform empathy-building research with the people we are designing for, it is also important to engage in an initial phase of secondary research to get a solid foundation before we address the problem we are aiming to solve.
For the first two weeks, we consumed an immense
There is no sign of vet care facilities, animal hospitals
amount of literature about dog behavior, loose dog
or any smaller care centers. In fact, the only 75216
intervention programs in Dallas and similar cities,
vet hospital listed on Google turned out to be
and research on the psychology of low-income
abandoned. One of our earliest experiences with
neighborhoods. This initial phase of research
a resident summed up the conditions of living in
helped to provide us with a better understanding
75216, saying, “We live in a food, entertainment, and
of the loose dog issue, how it is perceived by the
city of Dallas and the residents of 75216. This initial understanding allowed us to build empathy with our
Our secondary research uncovered an interesting
target audience, even before speaking with them.
truth: There is no universally agreed upon definition for responsible pet ownership.
Life in 75216 The zip code 75216 is comprised of 51,000 people
This was a fascinating discovery for us, so we kept
with an average income of $23,000/per year,
researching to find out why. We read through
placing 42% of this zip code’s population below
case studies, scholarly reports, and Psychological
the poverty line.
journals, and they each indicated that mental models of responsible pet ownership are tied to
Within the community, it is not unusual to see a
income. People identify as responsible pet owners if
series of abandoned commercial and residential
they attempt to do the best they can with what they
buildings, unkempt yards, and empty lots. When
have. But, there are inconsistencies in this reasoning,
we traveled throughout neighboring streets and
such as: What if the best someone can do isn’t
alleyways, we calculated that out of every 10 houses,
enough?; Who has the authority to determine
at least four houses have more than one dog with an
what “enough” means?; How can pet ownership
average of 2–3.
be improved if there is not agreement on what it should look like?
22 // Throw Them A Bone
VET CARE FACILITIES
Field Observation of ~50 Houses
HOUSES WITH DOGS
Throw Them A Bone // 23
RESEARCH METHODS Our methods are employed in the field, allowing
Participant Journey Map Creation
design researchers to gain a deep understanding
We used journey mapping as a framework to guide
of the people that they are working with through a
our interviews and shadowing experiences. This
series of immersive, in-person experiences.
framework gave structure to our conversations and gave our participants a system for expressing their
For this stage in our research process, we went out
southern Dallas â€œuser experienceâ€? as it pertained to
into the field to gain an in-depth understanding of
their actions taken, environments experienced, ideas
the loose dog issue in 75216 through a variety of
conceived, observations made, users engaged with,
resident and professional perspectives. The methods
and emotions felt
we used were:
In-Depth Interviews In order to understand the pet-owner experience in southern Dallas from multiple perspectives, we conducted a series of interviews with residents, animal activists, and animal professionals who either live or focus their efforts in 75216. These interviews lasted from 90 minutes to three hours and were conducted in-home or in-office. These conversations allowed us to collect personal accounts of experience, opinions, feelings, and perceptions through both verbal expressions and non-verbal observations.
Shadowing To immerse ourselves further in the southern Dallas loose dog experience, we shadowed professionals and volunteers from the SPCA and Dallas Animal Services as they engaged in their day-to-day activities. These experiences allowed us to collect insights through first hand exposure to their behavioral patterns in real-time.
24 // Throw Them A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 25
Glendale Park 75216
26 // Throw Them A Bone
WHAT WE FOUND
Through our immersive research, we were able to see the magnitude of the current loose dog situation, first-hand.
We wanted to understand the issue, the daily lives of
the people who face this issue every day, and how
The proactive approach categorizes the residents
they have designed “solutions” and adapted their
that have made the conscious decision to take the
behavior to combat the issue in different ways.
issue into their own hands and design solutions that benefit both them and their community. We found
Through our synthesis, we realized that there were
that these residents were generally directly affected
themes emerging from the resident’s designed
by an incident involving a loose dog, and were thus
solutions. We categorized these actions carried out
inspired to take action to prevent further incidents.
by residents in response to the issue as reactive
They are trying to solve the problem in their own
versus proactive approaches.
neighborhoods, and have particular, localized knowledge that we see to be missing from the city’s
current action plans.
The reactive approach categorizes the residents that are creating “workarounds” in navigating their daily life. They engage in their daily activities, but they have chosen to bring protection with them in the form of golf clubs, metal poles, and sticks. These “solutions” give them peace of mind to protect themselves against loose dogs. These behaviors, though important, are made out of response to the issue at hand and do not directly aim to solve the problem.
We decided to create our own names to define each of these individuals, and we categorized them as either a Community Reactivist or a Community Proactivist.
Throw Them A Bone // 27
Community Reactivist: [ree-ak-tuh-vist]
We define Community Reactivists as individuals focused on themselves, who have a perceived need for protection. Community Reactivists exhibit reactive behaviors out of response to the issue, therefore only treating the symptoms of the problem.
28 // Throw Them A Bone
Resident Throw Them A Bone // 29
OTIS & MEREDITH Otis and Meredith are a married couple that live in a neighborhood next to Glendale Park. Both are retired and frequently take walks around the park for exercise. They are very familiar with the loose dog problem around their neighborhood and often see dogs roaming the park while they walk. Because of this, they both carry golf clubs with them as a form of protection against the loose dogs. Otis explains “I’m not afraid of dogs, I just don’t want to get bit.” They are also dog owners but leave their dogs at home while they walk fearing a confrontation with a loose dog. Otis and Meredith explain that loose dogs are an everyday occurrence that everyone deals with in their neighborhood—everyone has their own way of dealing with them. The couple often see their next door neighbor’s dog jump the fence late at night and then come back after a couple hours. They have succumbed to the realization that most dogs will find a way to get out. In the past, Otis has called 311 after seeing loose dogs roaming his neighborhood. However, he has since stopped calling given no response from animal services after waiting for hours. Otis and Meredith continue to say that they mostly fear for the children that play in the park—if dogs were to ever surround them, they would use their clubs to scare them away.
30 // Throw Them A Bone
Reactivist Golf clubs provide them with protection from the loose dogs.
“I’m not afraid of dogs, I just don’t want to get bit.”
Throw Them A Bone // 31
LARRY While exiting the Family Dollar with shopping bags filled with dog food and treats, Larry walks towards his two dogs, Shelley and Ollie, tied to a bike post. Once setting eyes on their owner, Shelly and Ollie immediately cease barking at strangers and start wagging their tails uncontrollably. Larry, a long-time resident of 75216, and Navy Engineer veteran is a loving owner and views his dogs as family. Larry informed us that he acquired Shelley and Ollie in very different ways. Shelley was rescued off the streets while Ollie was given to Lawrence as a gift from a friend. In between barks from Shelley, Larry informs us that “she’s a good watch dog,” and that both dogs are like his companions. He says “I always wake up with them in the bed on me..I can’t stop them.” Larry and is very aware of the loose dog issue, and states that he never lets his dogs roam free purposefully. However, he has had an experience in the past where Ollie got loose from his backyard fence. He confides that he has holes in his fence where the dogs can penetrate when they want, but he knows that they will always come back. One night when Ollie did get out and came back covered in what Larry thought was another dog’s blood, but with no injuries to himself—presumably from a fight with another dog. Larry begins to laugh as he looks down at Ollie and says, “I keep telling him one day he’s going to meet his match.” Because of this, he makes sure that both Shelly and Ollie have spike colors on at all times. He says that “[the collars] are for their protection only, so no dog can get at their throats.”
32 // Throw Them A Bone
Reactivist Spike collars provide his dogs with protection from the loose dogs.
“I keep telling him one day he’s going to meet his match.”
Throw Them A Bone // 33
Community Proactivist: [proh-ak-tuh-vist]
We define Community Proactivists as individuals who create solutions to better the lives of themselves and others. They are self-starters who work to address the root of the issue. Community Proactivists exhibit proactive behaviors out of response to the issue, therefore tackling the heart of the problem.
34 // Throw Them A Bone
Resident Throw Them A Bone // 35
STEPHANIE Stephanie is a southern Dallas animal Proactivist who starting doing outreach given personal experience she had with the loose dog issue. Stephanie is a dog owner, loves dogs, and has very specific views on how to accomplish an improvement to the loose dog issue in southern Dallas. Stephanie’s main focus is on the residents that own dogs. Stephanie believes that one must first get to know the residents. Once a human connection is created, only then can one understand what their real needs are as a resident and a dog owner. She believes that the most impactful moments of her animal advocacy occurred as she built personal relationships with each individual in the neighborhoods that she served. Stephanie has a wealth of knowledge about the current state of dog ownership and care within the 75216 zip code and has many suggestions for improvement. Stephanie spoke at length about the spay/neuter campaigns currently available and how they are only helping only one type of resident. That resident is what she calls the “low hanging fruit”: the people who have access to the transportation to get to surgery centers and can sacrifice the time out of their day. Stephanie believes passionately that a “one size fits all” strategy to solving an issue as severe as the loose dogs will never happen if the residents are not put first in the eyes of the larger animal care organizations.
36 // Throw Them A Bone
Proactivist Relationship building helps her to understand resident’s actual needs.
“Current efforts are only helping the low hanging fruit.”
Throw Them A Bone // 37
JUSTINA Justina moved to 75216 a little more than a year ago and lives in an old farming neighborhood that is surrounded by many wooded areas where feral dogs live. Immediately after moving to her current home, she began witnessing the loose dog issue first hand. She saw her neighbors being terrorized by the loose and feral dogs that were frequently roaming the streets. Before moving to the zip code, Justina said that she wasn’t a dog person … “The neighborhood forces you to become one, because they are always around, and there is a lot of fear.” She explains that the best chance that a feral dog has for survival is if they are taken in and socialized with other dogs and humans. Because of this, Justina has chosen to take action for her and her neighbor’s sake. Justina says that she has noticed a decrease in the loose dogs during the time she’s lived in her neighborhood, but describes the still existing aggressive dogs as a self-fulfilling prophecy. “When people see them on the streets, they will shoot at them, throw rocks at them, and chase them off with sticks … so they learn to be aggressive from the people around them.” Every generation of loose, aggressive dogs brings them further and further from domestication. Justina’s passion comes from her determination to get the dogs off the streets, give them a better life, and provide human companionship. Over the three years of Justina’s outreach and activism, she has fostered, socialized, and homed more than 50 dogs. She contributes the incremental changes that she has been able to make in her neighborhood to the trust that she has been able to build over time.
38 // Throw Them A Bone
Proactivist Catching, socializing, and rehoming loose dogs keeps her neighborhood safe.
“[The dogs] are always around, and there is a lot of fear.”
Throw Them A Bone // 39
FRAN Fran lives in southern Dallas and is a passionate animal activist, but not by choice. Fran says, “I did not choose to be an animal activist.” She continues to recall a story when she was on her way to work, looked out her door window and realized that her front door and car were surrounded by feral dogs. She could not leave her house for fear of getting attacked. Since then, Fran has been on a mission to understand feral dog behavior and teach her neighbors the best ways to interact with them. Her and her community’s need for safety led her on a personal journey to form a proactive skill-set to combat the issue. Over the years, Fran has gained immense knowledge in feral dog behavior and how to trap and transfer them with the best outcome possible. Fran explains that the way in which you physically trap and handle feral dogs has a huge impact on the dog’s ability to be domesticated and adopted. If a feral dog is caught in an aggressive way, such as being choked with a restraining pole and thrown into a dark truck, they are at a high risk of being forever traumatized by the experience. Because of this, they will most likely be euthanized by city animal services. Fran is a high-energy Proactivist on a mission to make a difference. Over the years she has interacted with many city leaders, spent many hours creating plans for change, and publishing countless whitepapers and tutorials on how to combat the issue. She hopes this education material can fill some of the gaps that exist in the current city provided infrastructure.
40 // Throw Them A Bone
Proactivist Filling infrastructural gaps, like feral dog trapping, helps her neighbors stay safe.
“I did not choose to be an animal activist.”
Throw Them A Bone // 41
42 // Throw ‘Them’ A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 43
Prototyping is an incredibly effective way to make our hunches and insights into tangibles; to learn through making, and to quickly get key feedback from the Proactivists.
We moved through a variety of iterations based
Through our prototyping, we wanted to identify the
upon our experiences with the individuals of 75216
unfulfilled needs that these Community Proactivists
in order to build on what we continued to uncover
might have. We had a hunch, that if we were able
and understand about the nature of these residents.
to identify and fulfill those needs, the Proactivists would feel more supported and have the ability
We believe that the Community Proactivists are
to increase their impact with more resources at
the key to proper city-wide solution building.
We were intrigued by the small scale problem solving efforts being carried out by these residents.
During our field visits, we had several encounters
They responded this way due to a need in their
with Proactivists who told us that they do not
community, and took matters into their own
communicate with one another. While Stephanie
hands. We saw value in focusing on aiding these
taught us about the value of getting to know
action based, problem solving members of
those around you as a means of proactivism, we
southern Dallas that have risen due to necessity,
learned from Justina that others like her are rarely
and we came to think of them as superheros, the
in close collaboration with larger outside activist
Community Proactivists of southern Dallas.
and political organizations. With these insights in mind, we asserted that maybe, the level of impact
As we moved forward with our research, we planned
of a Proactivistsâ€™ work could be elevated through
to use our newfound knowledge to uncover exactly
collaboration. Our first prototype was focused on
how to leverage the benefits these perspectives
creating a space to unite these Proactivists, allowing
bring, and subsequently using this information to
them to share resources, generate dialogue, and
make headway to the deeply rooted loose dog
problem in southern Dallas. We aimed to find out what would happen if these community level leaders, who are proactively approaching the problem on their own, were elevated, connected, and heard.
44 // Throw Them A Bone
They took matters into their own hands. Throw Them A Bone // 45
PROTOTYPE 1: STRONGER TOGETHER COALITION Our team planned out a series of meeting
welcomed five leaders. The attendees ranged from
prototypes that we called the “Stronger Together
community Proactivists to SPCA staff and affiliated
Coalition” for three Saturdays at the John C. Phelps
community volunteers, ages 12 and up. Although
Rec Center in 75216. The meetings were intended
the turnout of the meeting was not astronomical, it
to provide Proactivists, outside organizations,
was enriching enough for us to begin preparation
and other individuals a space to meet, interact,
of the second meeting. We learned a lot about our
support and learn from one another. To our team,
participants’ leadership journeys and uncovered
the meetings meant the opportunity to facilitate
powerful insights that we wanted to address
Proactivist individuals’ conversations and provide
collaborative support, while gaining insights about them. With each Saturday meeting, we hoped
One of the insights that we gained from the first
Proactivists would gain the opportunity to share
meeting was that Proactivists have fears. Some of
their resources with other like minded individuals
the attendees voiced that there is an element of fear,
in their community while increasing lines of
ranging from the fear of having conflicting opinions
communication and each Proactivist’s impact.
with others in the community to the fear of retaliation when in disagreement. Once hearing that, we made
With a medley of breakfast food, oversized sticky
the inference, that not only do residents have barriers
note pads, plates and markers, our team set up
in talking and interacting with one other, but when
shop at John C. Phelps for the first Saturday,
they do, there is a fear of disagreement that might
Stronger Together Coalition meeting and
result in retaliation and conflict.
46 // Throw Them A Bone
A second insight we gained from the first meeting
the fear of retaliation and conflict from differing
was that there is contradiction in Proactivistsâ€™
opinions. We even heard from Justina that her
motivations. While Proactivists voiced the desire
past experiences attending dog activist meetings
to come together and collaborate with others
consisted of Dallas city officials giving false promises
in the community, they also voiced a dislike for
to her and taking her experienced knowledge
the types of meetings that were already in place.
for granted. This contradiction was surprising
When listening to the attendeeâ€™s stories, we learned
and intriguing to us, so we used it as a basis for
about these other meetings that were attended
our synthesis of the experience. How could we
in the past. The meetings were always outside of
reshape the second meeting to better fit what the
the community and were responsible for much of
Proactivists wanted to see and share?
Throw Them A Bone // 47
For one, we learned that the idea of a meeting itself was a turn off. The contradiction that presented itself in the first meeting seemed to be a deterrent to our second meeting as well. We inferred that since passions run so high, a meeting focused on dialogue is often unproductive and sometimes problematic. Second, we found that those in attendance already had their own systems of attacking the dog problem, so a meeting to talk about it was not as helpful as we assumed it might be.. Because of their loving, bold, and passionate natures, Proactivists have been able to make a real impact on their own. These individuals still want to share resources and knowledge with one another, but a meeting was not the answer. Proactivists want to take action! We learned that these activists are most comfortable in the field, helping the dogs and the people that brought them to where they are today. It is then that their interactions, sharing of skills and wealth of resources are the most genuine and can be elevated through the support of others.
48 // Throw Them A Bone
These leaders donâ€™t want to just talk. They want to take action.
Throw Them A Bone // 49
50 // Throw Them A Bone
REFOCUS: JUSTINA We knew that we wanted our research to focus on the Proactivists, and how we might support them in their actions, but through our first prototype, we realized that we needed to approach this challenge differently. From here, we reached out to Justina, who had been an incredible asset to this project every step of the way. She provided us with countless insights, shared what she has learned throughout her advocacy, and inspired us with her passionate work with the dogs in southern Dallas. Through our interactions with Justina, we wanted to learn, â€œWhat does it take to support the people who are already doing the work on the ground?â€? We spent the rest of the semester working with Justina; helping her achieve the goals that she set herself, so she could be more successful in her approach to the loose dog issue.
Throw Them A Bone // 51
JUSTINAâ€™S STORY Justina experiences the loose dog issue everyday.
It is important to remember that the process of
From a pack of feral dogs killing a cat in her
trapping and socializing feral dogs is substantially
backyard, to watching her neighbors react in fear to
different than the process of socializing dogs who
the packs of dogs on the streets, she is constantly
have a history of interaction with humans. But, if
designing her own solutions to relieve this issue.
they are handled correctly, amazing progress can be
Unfortunately, her resources are limited. Justinaâ€™s
made. Tattler and Emma are just two examples of
proactivism is motivated by the need to keep both
the progress that she has made with the feral pack in
the dogs and the people in her neighborhood safe.
Over the last three years, Justina has successfully
When we intervened, Justina had successfully
rehomed more than 50 stray and feral dogs. With
gotten all but one of the dogs in the feral pack
this process, she gets these feral dogs off the streets,
off the street, but with the resources that she had
fosters the dogs, and socializes them with other
at her disposal, catching the last dog was nearly
dogs and humans. Her motivation to do this comes
from her understanding of how loose and feral dogs are treated in the city of Dallas. She knows that if
Ghost was the last dog in the pack. She is a 60
feral dogs are brought directly to a shelter, they will
pound German Shepard, who is so intelligent, that
most likely not be adopted and they will ultimately
ordinary traps historically could not trap her.
not survive. In order to catch the dogs, she spends hours outside at a time, building trust with them. In fact, she told us about an experience she had building trust one feral dog, Tattler. Justina fed Tatter Vienna sausage everyday for a year, so that she could build up trust, and get Tattler off the streets. Tattler is a member of a feral pack that lived in the wooded area behind Justinaâ€™s house. It was this pack
Tatler and Emma, Then
that inspired Justina to begin her proactivism, and she made it her goal to get every member of the pack off of the streets and into warm, loving homes.
Tatler and Emma, Now
52 // Throw Them A Bone
Feral dogs on the streets are dangerous because: They do not trust people They are territorial They have a pack mindset They do everything they can to survive
(MICRO) PROTOTYPE 2: THE MISSY TRAP
We took action to help Justina overcome the barriers she faced with the feral dogs in her neighborhood.
In all of our conversations with Justina throughout the semester, she had talked about the state-of-theart “Missy Trap.” A trap developed with the intention to catch the smartest, most fearful dogs. And, when it isn’t needed, it can be broken down into pieces and easily transported. So, we built it for her. The trap served a couple purposes. Justina was so close to achieving the goal that she had set for herself, and we wanted to help her reach that goal, fulfill that need, in every way that we could. It was this pack of feral dogs that drove Justina to her activism, so we saw the opportunity to help her catch Ghost as a powerful tool in the support of her work and the empowerment of her actions. From the Human-Centered Design perspective, we built and deployed the trap as a micro-prototype to learn from the experience that Justina had working with it.
54 // Throw Them A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 55
In order for us to better understand Justina’s experience with the trap, we asked her to keep a log of her experience with the trap, noting every time she visited it, what she did, and how she felt.
Justina logged her experiences for us everyday, three, four, and even sometimes five times a day. But, despite our efforts, Ghost still refused to be trapped. Ghost learned that she could enter the trap, eat all of the food, and then jump the five feet that it took to escape. To combat this, we added a cargo net as a cover for the trap to keep the dog contained but not block out light. However, Ghost was still too smart. She knew that the trap was altered, and would eat the bait that was left for her, but leave enough food so that she didn’t trigger the gate. From Justina’s interactions with the trap, we learned that she needed the help of another Proactivist. Fran, who also focuses on feral dogs in her community, had resources and specialized knowledge about animal behavior to help us catch Ghost. With Fran’s help, we moved the trap to a new location, with its entrance facing the wooded area where Ghost lived. We changed the food that was used as bait, so that we could learn what Ghost was the most attracted to and we developed a plan of action to transport Ghost from the trap in to a portable crate, so that we would not traumatize her or create more fear. Together, Justina and Fran were able to catch Ghost. They are currently sharing the responsibility of fostering and socializing her because neither have the time or the finances to be able to do it on their own. They are working together because they share the passion for helping the dogs that others protect themselves from. 56 // Throw Them A Bone
Together, Justina and Fran were able to catch Ghost.
Throw Them A Bone // 57
58 // Throw Them A Bone
JUSTINA’S REFLECTION “The journey really starts here. Ferals don’t have a good chance in Dallas. We don’t have the capabilities to rehabilitate them at DAS and SPCA (at least not at the level of need). And most rescues willing to take in ferals are maxed out with experienced fosters and funds (heartworm treatment, training, etc). So Ghost is going to need a lot of people rooting for her. Due to the high chance of her not making it out alive at DAS, I have chosen to network quietly in texts and emails and not use my most useful tool, social media. Sadly, there would be a lot of anger toward me if people knew I let her go to DAS. It’s a bad cycle around here. If she makes it out alive, it may be the most impactful marketing DAS could do, because it would show that the cynicism against them isn’t founded. I guess only time will tell on that. I had to take the chance, because Ghost off the streets and no puppies is our only chance to have a feral free neighborhood. It was the quality of life for Ghost and my neighbors vs the possibility of losing her in DAS. These tough decisions keep most people out of this part.” Throw Them A Bone // 59
WHAT WE LEARNED
It’s not about the trap …
Since the beginning of our project, Justina had
There are many Proactivists embedded in their
very clear goals of catching, socializing, and finding
communities already engaging in small-scale efforts
Ghost a loving home, and continually expressed a
to supplement the large-scale efforts by city officials
need for a means to catch her. After our experience
and specialized non-profits. They are making areas
with Justina and the Missy Trap we learned what
of focus that have been neglected by the current,
it would take to provide one Proactivist, who was
large-scale outreach programs, their priority and
already doing the work on the ground, the tools she
they are successful. They are natural leaders that
needed to be successful. For Justina, this meant:
are empowered and powerful—they simply need
Roughly $500 to purchase trap materials; One day to
the resources to grow their efforts exponentially.
build the trap; A few iterations to optimize the trap; And finally, another Proactivist with complementary skill sets to help catch and transfer the feral dog. Working together through action is one way Proactivists can make positive change in their neighborhoods. Justina and Fran, focused on feral dogs and their welfare, were able to come together through action and catch the most intelligent of dogs, provide her with a better way of life, and find her a loving home. They have made an effort to get to know the landscape, the neighborhood dogs, and the people that live there out of the need for safety of themselves and their neighbors.
60 // Throw Them A Bone
… it’s about the experience.
Throw Them A Bone // 61
62 // Throw ‘Them’ A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 63
Where do we go from here? Through all of our research episodes, prototypes,
These organizations must also empower and
and interactions with the residents of 75216, we
support these Proactivists by providing them with
see that there is still a much greater opportunity
necessary resources so that their efforts may have
to both include and empower these Proactivists
greater impact. These are the residents with the
in the overall process of solution building. These
drive and the willingness to tackle their piece of
Proactivists are living the southern Dallas dog
the loose dog problem in their own neighborhood.
experience every day, and have specialized insights
They must be supplied with what they need to be
that only those directly affected by the issue can
successful in their efforts. Larger organizations have
have. These residentâ€™s perspectives come from
the power, the money, and the resources to do so
experience and are built on the necessity of dealing
much more: to identify people like Justina, and to
with the problem in their own neighborhoods.
help those people achieve their community-focused
Despite their value, they are currently going
goals, so that the successes can be scaled to a city-
unutilized and unincluded by the cityâ€™s current
action plans. Outside organizations such as SPCA, Communities Foundation, Dallas Animal Services, even city council, must tap these resources to create a sustainable solution to the loose dog problem.
64 // Throw Them A Bone
A program of micro-grants … The SPCA or the Communities Foundation of Texas would provide resources and funding to the Proactivists on a per project basis. This could be an application for funding, but also for items such as traps, tools, dog food, or even vehicles.
A new non-profit …
Possible Paths to Improvement
The organization would exist solely to work with and empower the Proactivists, not run through any other organization but by the advocates themselves. This organization would be granted financial support and resources so that advocates have what they need to help the problem in their neighborhood.
A series of workshops … Workshops hosted by Proactivists within their community to share information and best practices with other activists and officials. Proactivists would have the opportunity to communicate their unique knowledge gained from working in their neighborhood with those who could gain from hearing their experiences. Throw Them A Bone // 65
Whatever form the final solution takes the implementation must be guided by the following set of design principles.
These principles stand on more than one thousand hours of research and can be traced back to a variety of in-home interviews, expert interviews, and secondary research. We believe that a solution that utilizes these principles will be efficient, encompassing, and genuinely impactful towards improving pet ownership in southern Dallas.
66 // Throw Them A Bone
Initiatives must focus on action over conversation AND be hosted within the community Proactivists must be given physical, financial, and organizational support Communication must be open, constant, and transparent Efforts must be focused on proactiveâ€” not just reactiveâ€”solutions
Throw Them A Bone // 67
FINAL THOUGHTS Over the course of our research we saw an opportunity for outside organizations to both include and support those who have unique knowledge and are already doing the work. Our team was able to define two unique groups of residents in 75216: the Reactivists and the Proactivists and understand how both groups create their own solutions to the loose dog problem in their community. Again and again we saw how the Proactivists had a critical understanding of the issue in their neighborhood and how they were already tackling the problem affecting them and their neighbors. They are the ones who know the problem in their neighborhood the best and have adopted hyper-localized approaches in solving it. They are the ones who have built trust with their communities and are leveraging their networks to bring about positive change. They are the path forward. We believe that these Proactivists are currently going under-utilized in the broader city-wide solutions and unsupported in their current efforts. We see a handful of possible paths to improvement that can provide Proactivists the support and inclusion they need and that Dallas needs in order to bring greater impact to this issue. If these solutions make sure to follow the principles that we have outlined thus far, we believe that even greater impact can be had with this problem. Throughout this document, we have shown how a group of five graduate students with a small budget and large amount of empathy could empower one resident and fulfill her needs. Larger organizations such as SPCA, DAS, Communities Foundation, even city council, have the opportunity to do so much more with these Proactivists, and in this way, make our animals better cared for, our streets safer, and our city more livable.
68 // Throw Them A Bone
Provide Proactivists the support and inclusion they need.
Throw Them A Bone // 69
The Master of Arts in Design and Innovation at Southern Methodist University is an interdisciplinary program training students in the skills of Human-Centered Design, innovation, and creative problem solving. MADI students come from a variety of backgrounds and are encouraged to utilize their prior educational and professional experiences to complement the projects in the program. Students will graduate MADI with a strong foundation in Human-Centered Design, a process which values solutions that balance human desirability, business viability, and technical feasibility.
70 // Throw Them A Bone
Caleb Kyle Caleb seeks to be a well-rounded designer, technologist, and consultant with proficiencies in technology, human centered design, and business. He graduated with a B.S. in Computer Science from Southern Methodist University and is in his last year of the Master of Arts in Design and Innovation at SMU, hoping to take on a consulting or product design role after graduation. He enjoys craft beer, freelance web design, and lighting things on fire.
Ariel Martin Ariel is a graduate student at SMU studying Design and Innovation. She holds a B.F.A in Art Education from Ohio University and has 14 years of experience working in the marketing and advertising space. She’s excited to use her HumanCentered Design education to grow and diversify her career opportunities.
Rae’Van Parson Rae’Van, an Interior Design B.A. from the University of Oklahoma is now in her second year problem solving under the Masters of Design and Innovation program. Rae’Van seeks to elevate her knowledge in multidisciplinary design solving to improve and innovate retail interior and product design environments.
Laura Reed Laura is a graduate student at SMU pursuing her M.A. in Design and Innovation. She is a Digital Marketing Specialist with a demonstrated history of working in the financial services industry. She received a Bachelor of Science (B.S.) focused in Integrated Marketing and Communications with a minor in Business Administration from the University of Mississippi.
Michaela Rollins Michaela is in her last semester of the MADI program. She graduated from Indiana University with a B.A. in Psychology and Art History, and has a certificate in graphic design from the SMU CAPE program. MADI has allowed her to integrate her diverse interests in a meaningful way, and plans to take this multidisciplinary approach and apply it to her pursuits in the real world.
Throw Them A Bone // 71
72 // Throw Them A Bone
Throw Them A Bone // 73
THROW THEM A BONE
Scaling the Impact of the People at the Heart of the Loose Dog Problem
Final report for our studio project aiming to improve pet ownership in southern Dallas. SMU MADI.