Page 1

AGENDA CAEP Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting May 21-22, 2012

The Fairfax at Embassy Row, 2100 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC

Monday, May 21, 2012 8:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.

Welcome and Introductions Hot Buffet Breakfast Welcome Review of Agenda

9:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m.

9:30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.

10:30 a.m. – 10:45 a.m.

Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Gene Harris, Co-Chair

CAEP and the Charge to the Commission CAEP Overview Jim Cibulka, CAEP and NCATE Charge Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Gene Harris, Co-Chair Clinical Practice and Partnerships Nancy Zimpher, SUNY Kenneth Howey, SUNY

Balcony

Ballroom

Ballroom

Break Salon

10:45 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.

11:15 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.

Luncheon Discussion Starters for Working Groups:

Leveraging Change through Accreditation Jim Cibulka, CAEP and NCATE

Ballroom

Best Practice and Innovation in Accreditation Presentation Peter Ewell, NCHEMS 1)

How are new conceptions of schooling influencing the way we staff schools and prepare educators? 2) Should the Commission develop standards that are aspirational, prescriptive based in evidence, or integrated? 3) Should CAEP adopt Ewell’s principles of evidence or a similar framework for classifying data quality (i.e. relevant, verifiable, representative, cumulative, actionable)? 4) Should the Commission develop levels of accreditation differentiated by quality/quantity of evidence (i.e. meeting threshold vs. meeting standard at a high level)?

Ballroom


12:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m.

Working Luncheon

Working Groups Convene Introductions and Discussion of Assigned Question 1:45 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.

Balcony

Roundtable Discussion and ConsensusBuilding on Standards and Evidence Group Facilitation Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Gene Harris, Co-Chair 1)

How are new conceptions of schooling influencing the way we staff schools and prepare educators? 2) Should the Commission develop standards that are aspirational, prescriptive based in evidence, or integrated? 3) Should CAEP adopt Ewell’s principles of evidence or a similar framework for classifying data quality (i.e. relevant, verifiable, representative, cumulative, actionable)? 4) Should the Commission develop levels of accreditation differentiated by quality/quantity of evidence (i.e. meeting threshold vs. meeting standard at a high level)?

3:00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m.

Break

3:15 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

Primer on Current Standards and Evidence Deb Eldridge, CAEP Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP

4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

Proposed Structure and Timeline of Commission Group Facilitation Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Gene Harris, Co-Chair Reception

Bar and Hors d’oeuvres

Ballroom

Salon

Ballroom

Ballroom

Whitehall


AGENDA

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.

Welcome and Announcements

Hot Buffet Breakfast Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Welcome Review of Agenda 9:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m.

Gene Harris, Co-Chair

Putting the Pieces Together: CCSSO Presentation Janice Poda, Council of Chief State School Officers

1)InTASC Standards 2)Common Core State Standards 3)Accountability and Data Systems 4)President Luna’s Taskforce to Transform Educator Preparation 10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.

Balcony

Ballroom

Break Salon

10:30 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.

Interactive Panel Discussion on State Initiatives and Implications for Preparation Moderator: Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Panelists: Janice Poda, Council of Chief State School Officers Terry Holliday, KY Department of Education Christopher Koch, IL State Board of Education Gene Harris, Columbus City Schools Peggy Brookins, National Board Certified Teacher Melissa Erickson, National Parent Teacher Association

11:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.

Luncheon

12:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.

Creating a Road Map: Structure and Work of the Commission Camilla Benbow, Co-Chair Gene Harris, Co-Chair

Ballroom

2100 Prime

Ballroom


Breakouts by Working Group

1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.

-Content and Pedagogical Knowledge Working Group -Clinical Practice and Partnerships Working Group -Quality/Selectivity Working Group -Capacity, Quality and Continuous Improvement Working Group -Accreditation, Public Accountability & Transparency Working Group

Churchill Balcony Whitehall Whitehall Hunt

Report Backs: Scope of Work, Issues, and Needs

3:00 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.

Ballroom

Next Steps and Adjourn

3:45 p.m. – 3:55 p.m.

Ballroom

Additional Instructions:

In advance of the meeting, please review the following materials at http://issuu.com/caep: 1) Commission Charge 2) Proposed Commission Structure 3) Peter Ewell’s paper, Recent Trends and Practices in Accreditation: Implications for the Development of 4) 5) 6) 7) 8)

Standards for Council for the Accreditation of Education Programs (CAEP) National Research Council Summary of Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy

NCATE Blue Ribbon Panel Report Current Standards and Evidence: CAEP, NCATE, and TEAC Commission Biographies List of resources for the CAEP Commission and Working Groups (all resources are located in the issuu

library)

Accessing CAEP Commission Materials To view, download, or print the materials, click the name of the document. Then complete one of the following steps.  You may view the document by clicking “Click to Read”  Print by the document by clicking the Printer Icon  You may also download by clicking the Folder Icon. Login Information Username: caepcommission Password: caep

Agenda  

CAEP Commission on Standards and Performance Reporting Agenda for the May 21-22, 2012 Meeting