Page 1

S5309 CABD 4.2 sw11



Page 43

Mixed States in Bipolar Disorders

40. 41. 42. 43.

44. 45.


47. 48. 49. 50.


mifepristone (RU-486) in bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 1538–1545. Bowden CL. Strategies to reduce misdiagnosis of bipolar depression. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 51–55. Angst J, Wicki W. The Zurich Study, XIII. Recurrent brief anxiety. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 241: 296–300. Angst J, Wicki W. The Zuric Study. XIII. Recurrent brief anxiety. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991; 240: 339–348. Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, Coryell W, Endicott J, Maser JD et al. A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60: 261–269. Gitlin MJ, Swendsen J, Heller TL, Hammen C. Relapse and impairment in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 1635–1640. Post RM, Rubinow DR, Uhde TW, Roy-Byrne PP, Linnoila M, Rosoff A et al. Dysphoric mania: clinical and biological correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46: 353–358. Bowden C, Singh V, Thompson P, Gonzalez J, Prihoda T, Dahl M et al. Development of the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (poster). 6th International Bipolar Conference, Pittsburgh, USA, 2005. Wehr TA, Goodwin FK. Can antidepressants cause mania and worsen the course of affective illness? Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 1403–1411. Akiskal HS. Dysthymic and cyclothymic depressions: therapeutic considerations. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55 (Suppl): 46–52. Akiskal HS, Mallya G. Criteria for the ‘soft’ bipolar spectrum: treatment implications. Psychopharmacol Bull 1987; 23: 68–73. Dilsaver SC, Swann AC. Mixed mania: apparent induction by a tricyclic antidepressant in five consecutively treated patients with bipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry 1995; 37: 60–62. Allan AM, Harris RA. Acute and chronic enthanol treatments alter GABA receptor-operated chloride

channels. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1987; 27: 665–670. 52. Secunda SK, Swann A, Katz MM, Koslow SH, Croughan J, Chang S. Diagnosis and treatment of mixed mania. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144: 96–98. 53. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Coryell W, Endicott J, Mueller TI. Bipolar I: a five year prospective follow-up. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181: 238–245. 54. Post RM, Uhde TW, Roy-Byrne PP, Joffe RT. Antidepressant effects of carbamazepine. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143: 29–34. 55. Dilsaver SC, Swann SC, Chen YW, Shoaib A, Joe B, Krajewski KJ et al. Treatment of bipolar depression with carbamazepine: results of an open study. Biol Psychiatry 1996; 40: 935–937. 56. Weisler RH, Kalali AH, Ketter TA, SPD417 Study Group. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial of extended-release carbamazepine capsules as monotherapy for bipolar disorder patients with manic or mixed episodes. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65: 478–484. 57. Yatham LN. Atypical antipsychotics for bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2005; 28: 325–347. 58. Tohen M, Sanger TM, McElroy SL, Tollefson GD, Chengappa KNR, Daniel DG et al. Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of acute mania. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 702–709. 59. Tohen M, Jacobs TG, Grundy SL, McElroy SL, Banov MC, Janicak PG et al. Efficacy of olanzapine in acute bipolar mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57: 841–849. 60. Keck PE, Jr, Versiani M, Potkin S, West SA, Giller E, Ice K. Ziprasidone in the treatment of acute bipolar mania: a three-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 741–748. 61. Khanna S, Vieta E, Lyons B, Grossman F, Kramer M. Risperidone in the treatment of acute bipolar mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 290 patients. Eur Neuropsychopharmacology 2003; 13 (Suppl): 314–315. 62. Vieta E, Goikolea JM, Corbella B, Benabarre A, Reinares M, Martinez G et al. Risperidone safety and efficacy in







69. 70. 71.

the treatment of bipolar and schizoaffective disorders: results from a 6-month, multicenter, open study. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 818–825. Bowden CL, Grunze H, Mullen J, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Jones M et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled efficacy and safety study of quetiapine or lithium as monotherapy for mania in bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66: 111–121. McIntyre RS, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Huizar K, Mullen J. Quetiapine or haloperidol as monotherapy for bipolar mania – a 12-week, double-blind, randomised, parallelgroup, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 573–585. Vieta E, Mullen J, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Jones M. Quetiapine monotherapy for mania associated with bipolar disorder: combined analysis of two international, double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled studies. Curr Med Res Opin 2005, 6: 923–934. Esparon J, Kolloori J, Naylor GJ, McHarg AM, Smith AH, Hopwood SE. Comparison of the prophylactic action of flupenthixol with placebo in lithium treated manicdepressive patients. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 148: 723–725. Small JG, Klapper MH, Milstein V, Kellams JJ, Miller MJ, Marhenke JD et al. Carbamazepine compared with lithium in the treatment of mania. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48: 915–921. Dilsaver SC, Swann AC, Shoaib AM, Bowers TC. The manic syndrome: factors which may predict a patient’s response to lithium, carbamazepine and valproate. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1993; 18: 61–66. Bowden CL. The ability of lithium and other mood stabilizers to decrease suicide risk and prevent relapse. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000; 2: 490–494. Goldberg RJ. Practical Guide to the Care of the Psychiatric Patient, 2nd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998. Bowden CL, Collins MA, McElroy SL, Calabrese JR, Swann AC, Weisler RH et al. Relationship of mania symptomatology to maintenance treatment response with divalproex, lithium, or placebo. Neuropsychopharmacology 2005 Jun 8 (Epub ahead of print).


Letters to the Editors Use of Technology in Bipolar Disorders DEAR SIRS, We are writing following the publication of Bauer et al.1 that reviewed the new technologies currently available for the longitudinal study of bipolar disorders. The article highlighted a number of important points that merit further discussion given the rapid rise of these new technologies in our field. First of all, as a collaborating centre with the ChronoRecord Association, we would like to share our enthusiasm about the development of such software. Our experience from testing and evaluating ChronoRecord® has been very positive. As a result of

this we will be using ChronoRecord® in our recently funded (by the Medical Research Council) study2 that will investigate the utility and feasibility of using a range of different electronic monitoring methodologies, to track symptom variability and the course of bipolar disorders in patients from different age ranges, in a number of treatment settings. Although ChronoRecord® as it stands represents the most advanced and best validated application at present, thanks to the excellent work of Tasha Glenn (ChronoRecord Association), it is worth making a note of the Palm Life Chart application developed by Lars Scharer.3 The Palm Life Chart runs on Palmbased devices (personal digital assistants [PDAs]) and is based on the National Institute of Mental Health Life Chart methodology, which has a substantial validation track record,4

Clinical Approaches in Bipolar Disorders 2005; 4: 43–45


S5309 CABD 4.2 sw11



Page 44

Letters to the Editors

albeit in its paper version. We are still waiting to see published data about the Palm Life Chart but we believe that this is an equally robust system. We feel that our knowledge about what works best, and for whom, with these technologies is preliminary, and that handheld devices (e.g. PDAs and mobile phones) have considerable promise, especially with younger people who have a lot of experience using such machines. Our experience with young people with bipolar disorders from MDF The Bipolar Organisation,5 the UK advocacy group, suggests that handheld devices can offer the individual a degree of freedom and privacy for recording information and monitoring their illness, which is not possible through either desktop or web-based applications that run on a personal computer. Given that such devices are now relatively cheap, losses for long-term studies can be easily absorbed. Customized software for these devices is not necessarily expensive and there are open source alternatives6,7 that would allow any research group to build their custom forms to monitor their chosen variables of interest. As Dr Bauer suggested, our focus should remain on study processes (and the underlying methodologies) rather than on technology. We hope that the reported studies along with our ongoing study will soon help to increase our field’s knowledge regarding the issues and challenges involved with the rise of machines in clinical research with bipolar disorders. Y Malliaris and J Scott Institute of Psychiatry King’s College, University of London, London, UK References 1.




5. 6.


Bauer M, Grof P, Rasgon N, Sasse J, Glenn T, Nuuhaus K et al. New technology for longitudinal studies of patients with bipolar disorder. Clin Approach Bipolar Disord 2005; 4: 4–10. Scott J, Malliaris Y, Ferrier N. MDF. Electronic monitoring of day to day symptom variability in individuals with bipolar disorder: feasibility and acceptability of use, and reliability and validity as an outcome measure, 2005; MRC Trial Platform Grant. Further information available at: (last accessed July 29, 2005). Scharer LO, Hartweg V, Valerius G, Graf M, Hoern M, Biedermann C et al. Life charts on a palmtop computer: first results of a feasibility study with an electronic diary for bipolar patients. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4 (Suppl 1): 107–108. Denicoff KD, Leverich GS, Nolen WA, Rush AJ, McElroy SL, Keck PE et al. Validation of the prospective NIMH-Life-Chart Method (NIMH-LCM super(TM)-p) for longitudinal assessment of bipolar illness. Psychol Med 2000; 30, 6: 1391–1397. MDF The Bipolar Organisation. Available at: (last accessed July 29, 2005). Weiss HM, Beal DJ, Lucy SL, MacDermid SM. The Purdue Momentary Assessment Tool (PMAT). Available at: (last accessed August 15, 2005). Barrett DJ, Feldman Barrett L. The Experience-Sampling Program (ESP) (2000). Available at: (last accessed August 1, 2005).

DEAR SIRS, We write in response to the paper ‘New Technology for Longitudinal Studies of Patients with Bipolar Disorder’ by Bauer et al.1 Longitudinal presentation of psychiatric illnesses is a costeffective method with a capacity to excavate otherwise hidden


information.2,3 Despite the promising potential, we found that in New York City very few providers, patients, or family members are involved in this method. We hope that a computer-focused update1 of the topic will bring new impetus into the methodology. Patients and their loved ones routinely make decisions such as calling in sick, investing, or seeking an additional or new medical provider. While the above issues are likely rooted in psychiatry, and the charts could help in decision making, therapists may not be able to assist patients at this operational level. Existing workforce (from quality engineers to computer specialists) provides many potential patients or family members with advanced know-how and researcher capacity in longitudinal presentation.1 We used the self-rated version of the Life Chart Manual (LCM)4 to introduce mental health patients to the retrospective life chart. Manic and depressive periods were rated as small, medium, or large. To establish reference, patients were instructed to recall their worst depressive and/or manic episodes. While the patients were enthusiastic to learn graphic methods, they were apprehensive about becoming part of a governmentsponsored study – part of the reason being that there were no incentives such as research participation fees or access to new experimental drugs or treatments to motivate participants to forward their charts anonymously to a research database. To illustrate the personal benefits of the LCM we would like to report the case of Mr A, a 49-year-old patient with a 35-year history of psychopathology. Mr A kept LCMs (35 years retrospective; 9 years in prospective forms; 3 in paper and 6 in Excel™ form). His selfrating primarily contained: wake-up status, back pain, anxiety, intermittent explosive disorder (IED) attacks, mood, and physical exercise. Self-rating was entered on a 0–10 scale. The daily rating was an estimate in relation to three reference values: the rating from the day before, common rating, and lifetime best/worst rating. The following are examples of a few common ratings: anxiety, 3; mood, 7; back pain, 0. Wake-up status was rated as bad (–10); neutral (0); or good (10). Comments were noted as needed. Mr A’s symptoms manifested in screaming, hitting himself, and jumping prone onto the floor, while his worst two attacks were accompanied with amnesia. A minor criminal violation deepened his concern about his condition. At age 32 he was started on 100 mg imipramine to treat what appeared to be panic disorder. Shortly after an increase of the imipramine dosage to 150 mg at age 35 he was hospitalized with imipramine-induced mania (flight of thoughts, religious grandiosity, and impaired judgment). No manic episode followed and with the exception of a bipolar depression after the manic episode, Mr A had no signs of clinical depression. His electroencephalogram (EEG) showed mildly diffused slow-ins without epileptiform activity; and his head magnetic resonance image was unremarkable. He had no alcohol or substance abuse problem. IED was diagnosed at age 36. The diagnosis was based on

Clinical Approaches in Bipolar Disorders 2005; 4: 43–45

Technology in Bipolar disorder  

Malliaris, Y., Scott, J. (2005) Use of technology in Bipolar Disorders. Letter in response to Bauer et al.(2004) Bipolar Disorders in Clinic...

Read more
Read more
Similar to
Popular now
Just for you