Solihull Director of Public Health Annual Report 2013/14

Page 18

DPH Report:Layout 1

3/6/14

13:01

Page 18

Box 1 Outcome of Assessment of Business Cases The table below gives guidance on how to score a proposed intervention Factor Identified as a local priority within strategic plan (eg H&WB, PDM, CCG plan)?

National target (eg PHOF)

18

Scale Low

Medium

High

5

20

40

Meets few objectives

5

Strength of evidence (eg NICE)

5 Experimental, case series, opinion

Number of people who will benefit (% of population eligible for the intervention)

5 Under 0.5% (<1,000 people)

Meets some objectives in CCG and Council Plan

Meets numerous objectives described in PDM

20

40

20

40

Single RCT

Multiple good quality RCTs, systematic review

20

40

Under 5% (<10,000)

More than 10% (20,000 +)

Impact on health inequality

3

10

30

Cost effectiveness (is the service development cost saving in the short, med or long term?)

5

20

40

Fair Solihull Healthy Lives – One Year On

No cost savings identified

Evidenced long term savings

Evidenced short/medium term savings


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.