l. Whether the Trial Court erred in finding acie Colette llr'eeman Bergeron in Conternpt of Court and failing to find good cause by Lacie Colette Freernan Berger.on to lvithhold visitation of the minor children to De 2.
Rudy Mark Bergeron, Jr.
Whether the Tlial Court erred in sentenci g Lacie Colette Fleeman Bergerou to ten (10) days in the Parish.lail with all but twenty-
r (24) hours suspended.
Whethel the Trial Court eued in denying Lacie Colette Freeman l3ergeron's prayer lbr. psychological evaluations and child custod evaluations.
The Trial Court erred in finding Lacie
olettc Freenran Bergero'll in Contemrpt of
Court and faining to lind good cause by La
Colette Freernan Ilergeron to rvithholcl
vnsitation of the rninor children to Defendant,
Plaintifl avers that the irleparable injury action
tly Mark Bcrgcroh, Jr. harm rnay result to the minor children in this
is allowed unsupervised visi tion. As provided above, Def'endant,
Mark Bergeron, Jr. has adrnitted to: thlee (3) previ alcohol abuse treatments, previbus illegal drug
arrests for driving while intoxicated, prior
use. Furthel admitting that he is oulrently
living with a wolnalt, to whom he is not malriecl,
at has been convicted and has only recently
completed probation for possession of methamp
mines. Defendant provided that this is the
same wolnan that the minor children were left
ith while he was at
during his entire
visitation peliod, minus one (1) and one-half (I12) Defendant's sister, Alicia Bergelon then te ificd to the Trial Court that when she was
mirlor, her lbther, while intoxicated, attempted to
her and grab her breasl.. Tliis is 1he sanre
individual that Susan Webster stated she allorved
nd the minor children during Rr-rdy Mark
Bcrgcrou Jr.'s priol visitation.
Plaintiff, Lacie Colette Freeman Bergeron
rs that visitation may be rvithhelcl Llpon a
showing of good calrse, More speoifically stating rat under LSA-RS 9:346(G): afl-irmative defense that lhe failure to allow or ex ordered schedule was by mutual consent, beyond t canse shown. Emphasis Added.
It sliall be an
visitation rights pursuant to a coult-
control of tlie defbndant, or for other goocl
Published on Aug 2, 2010