Page 172

Bergeron vs. Bergeron Mcry 17,2O10 Docket # 31, 619

1

2 3 4

5 6 1 B

9

10 11 T2

THE EOURT: Tt y/all IUR. pERQUE

wish.

It's

up to y'a11.

:

Very briefly, Your Honor. I think we've heard from the parties that there are some subsLantLaL issues between them and some substan tia I concerns regard ing Lhe minor children. Mr. Bergeron was on the stand and said that he hacl the children for 36 hours 1n his Iasb visitation period anci wasn't

15

there for any of it, except for an hour a nd a ha Lf . I be-Lieve Lhat when my client did withhold

\â‚Ź,

visiIation

13 74

26

she did so with goocl cause. She did so for the children' s medical health, their condrtions The children she testif ied here ti-rat Ethan, the youngest, was given peanut butter, to which he is highly allergic and had to go to the doctor for that Lhe fol lowinq day. As far psychological evalua tions, I do Ihink Lhat's necessaryI

21

be 1i eve that

1',7

]B 19

20

2I 22

23 24

25

2B ac)

-

we' ve shown that , ancl

I believe that -Ls in order. - LIREif TE

a custocly

evaluation

30

}1IS

31

Your Honor, there's no records been shown Lb or anyone else tha

32

:

23'd ,Jud.icial- Di-strict Court Judge Thomas J. ItJ.iebert , Jr

.

! liir

t-

I slr'l

7A

BergeronvsBergeron Court minutes  

Court minutes 2009-2010