Page 153

Bergeron vs. Bergeron

Moy l7 ,2010 Doclcei +f 31, 619 1

A"

2

mai

a

-)

4

5

6 1 B

9

r could L

hawe,

r guess,

put

in

bhe

-

Why didn' t you? I didn't. o- Do you understand that you're under a courL order that is part of a joint custody implementa-tion that says you're supposed to lceep t-he oLher person noLified of where yoLr are lLvinq? O. A"

10

A.

11

O

"

72

p

rob I

l3

n

14

Ll-

Yes,

matam.

And so you don't

think

that

LhaL, s

a

em?

Vo:Jr : v L{ rr

thaL

lhrF that

/

Lhing

possibly ^n ---it-1.,

stuff

I6

Lhere's

11

a lot

1B

chLldren"

L9

O.

In

20

A:

Ycs,

2I

O"

Now, there's

and didn,t a loI of

,,^.--t^r would be a problem,

tha L r didn't

15

of

things

your

let

him know my address,

Ihings

Lhat

he hasn't

opinion,

but

do fo r Lhe cus Lody he's

not

done to

fo]lowed,

protect

his

correct?

ma'am. a I udgmenE Ihat

says he was Chr j sLmas L j me,,

22 aZ)

a retter

t-arrect?

24

A"

Yes,

25

O"

Did he get

26

A.

No

21

o"

There

2B

Lo geI

some visitation

29

he get

Mardi

30

A.

Yes

-

31

o"

He got

32

cto

L

L

matam. Christmas

visitation

?

.

wa

s arso Gras

it

an order time

tha L he was aL Mardi

s Lrpposer-l

Gras.

Dict

visitation?

on the

weekend

he was supposed

to

?

23'd Judieia]- Dist,rict. Court ,Judgre Thomas ,J. I(liebert,

Jr.

tr1 JL

xil{}

BergeronvsBergeron Court minutes  
BergeronvsBergeron Court minutes  

Court minutes 2009-2010

Advertisement