Page 1

intimacy


Curator: Maha Malik Layout Design: Sara Suleman Photography: Courtesy of the Artists Cover Credit: Ayessha Quraishi, Journal Detail, 1999. Printed at Topical, Lahore. (info@topicalprinters.com) Published: 2013 copyright Š 2013

intimacy curated by maha malik

All rights reserved under international copyright convention. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.

F-42/2, Block 4, Clifton, Karachi, Pakistan +92(21) 35831292 | 35364013 www.koel.com.pk, gallerykoel@gmail.com

ayessha quraishi. lala rukh. meher afroz. mussarat mirza. naiza h. khan


anthology for a quiet mind

I At first, let me suggest a rhetorical question. How may a work, in which figurative form is excised, be at once deeply sensual? Conversely, one may ask, where then lies the realm of the sensual? Let us begin with a not uncommon contemporary condition – the erosion of communicable experience. In extreme, testimonials of depersonalized states often describe the world as a blank slate. During such episodes, discursive meaning is lost, an inner referential language and logic, at the same times as the world loses distinction – resemblance, contour, weight. And yet within this condition of figural loss, a great and frightening exertion, there sometimes emerges another plane of consciousness, an uncanny fluency, an inner sense of address. It were as though intimate speech lay at the limits of received, representational language, or in its very rupture. Critic Geeta Kapur provides an unusual corollary perspective in her discussion of the Indian artist, Nasreen Mohamedi. She speaks of abstract art in terms of ‘the absent body’. This is not the literal absence of body, but something at once obscured and inviolably present, a constitutional force in the work. And she writes: ‘…as if to say, the absent body creates its own phenomenology of space.’ 1 The current exhibition is a manner of improvisation on this phrase, including all that it theoretically underscores. Titled Intimacy, in that first sense of self-address, the show draws upon the practice of five artists who either work directly with abstraction, or who have turned away from the centrality of figural form in recent years. The 5


show spans three generations of women. And it highlights a range

urban space and modernity manifests most strikingly, for this viewer,

of work – distinctly different in oeuvre as it is in intent. Gathered in

in a series of large-format landscape paintings. Eschewing

one place though, these differences grow porous, complementary,

conventional protocols of the genre, including verisimilitude and

conversational. A constellation of meanings emerge around the

nostalgia, these works appear instead as studies of rent space. They

artists’ spatial gesture.

are marked by open brushwork, as well as by the loss of a single, cohering perspective (as around a figure). Terrestrial form is built up,

II

layer by layer, and simultaneously rendered solvent, disaggregate,

From a curatorial perspective, two poles of spatial rendering

in the same visual frame. One is reminded here of critic Meena

structure the exhibition. At one end, we radically revisit the genre

Alexander’s observation: ‘One cannot conceive of landscape in

of landscape. And at the other end, within formal abstraction, we

the structure of which the perceiving subject is not implicit.’2

return to the power of a contemplative art aesthetic. Lines of affiliation blur on canvas. Regions of thought begin to surface,

In view of this insight, one may see how the genre serves Khan as a

affective, metaphysical, social. One may speak of a kind of

site for spatialization of the self. Categories of public/ private

building up, an intimate terrain in the work. It were as though the

narrative grow redundant. We find in these paintings, in their

absent body allows for amplified subjectivity.

structural encourse, the fabrication of a more visceral historic consciousness. The artist employs a cosmopolitan range of

Not bound by the confines of visible, mimetic form, something more

reference towards this end. It includes medieval European

subtle, ephemeral, and poignant, is raised here as discourse. For in

landscape painting, studies of Japanese woodcuts, local folk

the gesture of opening up space, articulating it thus, the

narrative, as well as urban-historic research. Khan appears to have

mysterious nature of ‘inhabitance’ is made critical. By this I suggest

transformed her earlier, directive propositions about the body into

a dialectical concern: that of dwelling intimately in our times, and

at once wider and more circumspect realms of thought.

in privation, on this land, in solitude, in relation. Binary oppositions are excised. Inside and out grow fluid. For our selected artists, the

Mussarat Mirza is renowned for her site-specific work. In the first

category of sensual perception itself becomes a conceptual tool.

instance, she draws inspiration from the city of Sukkur, where she is based. A palette for light colors, a palette for dark colors, and a

6

III

third, where something new emerges – the spirit of an arid, ancient,

Naiza Khan. During the last five years, Naiza Khan has produced

spiritually dense land. I speak of the innate quietness in her work, as

a sustained body of work which both documents and responds to

we cross the Indus full of autumn shine. The city is a maze, a

the changing topography of Manora Island. Her engagement with

skyline of fragile brick towers, at a distance. But everywhere, in a 7


side lane, through a sudden doorway, emerging from the river,

emergence. In this rich, textural body of work Mirza uses landscape

there are dargahs, mandirs, the hazris of local buzurgs, Khwaja

personally. She draws on the intellectual context of aniconic Islam,

Khizr’s astana. Amidst such density and such ruin, I see a vision of

a particular history of abstraction, in order to suggest her subject.

worn, almost sheer sails, and the steadiness of water beneath. We begin to speak about a manner of witness. It were as though this

Lala Rukh is acknowledged for her pioneering work in the field of

is what her oil paintings acknowledged – the feeling of receiving

minimal art in the region. Her ocean-based series may be sourced

great distances.

in the early 9os. Some two decades of sustained attendance, upon a single terrestrial frame, have helped facilitate her signature style:

Mirza works within the monastic discipline of limitation. She works

a spare, emotionally resonant visual language. Lala Rukh uses a

from memory, while her canvases are structured by the framing

fragile and venerable format as the basis for her seascape imagery.

principles of landscape. In seeking the essence of things,

This intensity of black, its sensual force, is expressive in the artist’s

abstraction serves her as a tool, both conceptually and visually.

hands. Over the years Lala Rukh has shifted media, from

One is reminded here that Sukkur is suffused with burial sites. It is

photographic to carbon paper, and her mark-making has grown

marked by that which renders the other side. But this as well: in a

increasingly reductive. We are privy to an exceptional kind of

city of continual urban walling in, view is everything. The word

confidence – a processual subjective erasure in the work. The artist’s

‘manzir’ takes on implications of spiritual guidance, discernment.

most recent works are rendered in graphite, black on embracing

Color, she occasions, is in the eyes of the artist. ‘We live in a world of

black.

dust, not concrete flesh and bone, but dust.’ Her reference to eastern classical music here is critical. ‘We have Interiors and arable views of the city, all are emptied out in panels

been discussing drawing as thought process, or thinking in the

of light and dark, densely applied color, but for the implicit

language of drawing. This language is abstract, like music, and it

breath-presence of the viewing subject. ‘Figure and environment…

has its own logic.’4 Continuing the analogy, one may perceive the

the two elements in her paintings fuse together…until they may be

state of drawing, of art itself, as consonant with music in the artist’s

indistinguishable from one another.’ The paradox is striking. Such

oeuvre. In its inner disciplines, as well as in its refusal of delineated

alive figural imagination (on the literal as well as esoteric plane),

form, the work does not occlude narrative. On the contrary, a

and yet the outlook on canvas is a manner of departure, a

welling power of personal narrative may be received in Lala Rukh’s

dissolution of form. We view a practice in which the very notion

most visually obscure works. Abstraction sustains the very possibility

of depth is altered. It is as though the world of appearances were

of expression, of vocality.

3

revealed, surpassed – to gesture at the breadth of some other great 8

9


Turning to its art historic context, one of the main features that

describes this shift within the conceptual terms of a palimpsest, or a

distinguishes abstraction in the subcontinent from its Euro-American

visual manuscript in which contemporary marks give way to expose

antecedent is that the phenomenon did not replace representation

earlier, erased images in the same space. Her concerns with

here in any pure, exclusivist sense. On the contrary, from the 50s

continuum and a historically conscious register remain constant. But

onwards artists in both Pakistan and India drew on and

in her most recent works, she further plumbs the potential of

reinterpreted the discourse for their own particular relevance. We

non-figural spatiality.

return to the plural nature of regional aesthetics, and Lala Rukh’s work may be considered in this median trajectory. In particular,

Afroz uses the word ‘sada’ to describe this new orientation. Past the

narrative and abstraction are not mutually opposed categories for

purely visual picture plane, her textural practice alludes to sonic

her. In those light, barely visible markings on carbon, we receive

force, to a calling and reception, as it were. Geometric harmony,

entire tableaux of feeling as well as reference. And we are barely

an aspect of her earlier works, is all but effaced here. In its place

able to explain this phenomenon, on the surface of reason. The

we find a great gestural fluidity. The artist repeatedly renders the

subtlety of Lala Rukh’s gesture speaks to a kind of spatial freedom,

Quranic syllable ‘hu’, till its graphic form is no longer apparent. The

a motional grace manifest across her work, including the

two-dimensional surface transforms into rhythmic affect.

‘nightscape’ series. In her turn away from the primacy of representational logic, Afroz Meher Afroz is known both as pioneering printmaker and as painter

seems to query conventional categories of perception. The

par excellence. Her work is often considered within the parameters

acoustic and tensile fabric of her works compel viewers to receive

of subcontinental visual reference and incisive social critique. In

‘art’ with a reciprocal attendance. Bereft of figural form, one begins

terms of method, her canvases are defined by a dedicated

to receive meaning in terms of proximities, and subtle thresholds,

exploration of texture-building techniques. Her imperative, ‘to layer,

the eloquence of states of flow.

scratch, emboss acrylic pigment, until the surface coalesces with detail, to form [an independent] pictorial language.’5 This layered

Ayessha Quraishi has used abstract method across the body of her

effect suggests an aesthetic and temporally resonant environment,

work. The youngest artist in this constellation, her practice may be

upon which the artist builds her critical commentaries. Figures enter

understood in terms of a formal, contemplative art aesthetic. Her

the picture plane, specifically as a means of narrative conveyance.

works on paper are non-discursive in the first instance, and they suggest the meditative, as subject matter. The artist mediates with

10

In recent years however, the artist has begun to explore that

her hands directly. Moving oils on paper, she seems to render the

‘independent pictorial language’ as subject in and of itself. Afroz

very experience of objectless states. ‘You create an armature for 11


silence, a holding place for emptiness to be.’ Quraishi seems to instill in her works a rich sense of stillness, a way of being in the depths where there appears no thing, and not void, but a place of living and expressive matter, light. Her compositions use the formal apparatus of color, line, and texture, rhythmically finessed to the point paint yields its own luster. It illuminates the environment at hand. The power of such privation may be sourced in a series of small diaries, art journals covered in dull gold. The artist has maintained these journals as reference for over two decades. They carry the same gestural activity as her larger works on paper and on timber, except for their slight format. Each book opens to jeweled color and to graphite markings in the manner of a naïve art. For her current works, the artist has photographed selected pages from her

which figurative form is excised, be at once deeply sensual? Conversely, one may ask, where then lies the realm of the sensual? Without conclusion, here is a way of speaking about the body: in the language of lyrical absence. From the charge of landscape in their work to strictures of formal abstraction, the selected artists return us to critical spatial and subjective concerns within contemporary art in Pakistan. We find at stake the imperative of communicable experience. As digression, we once again begin to prize open a ‘sense’ of the feminine, or what it may mean to bear one’s own intimacy. Maha Malik . December 2012

diaries, digitally reworking them for print. These are then scaled and manually addressed with oils, as per her practice. The contemporary distinction between digital image and painting, with all its biases in tow, becomes radically blurred in the work. In how many ways may one source yield itself? The question is raised here as both creative challenge and as ethical value. Quraishi explores the relationship between singular utterance and a proliferation of meaning in this particular suit of images. And, as per her prior thematics, the exhaustive technique suggests a particular

End notes: 1. Geeta Kapur. With Frugal Means: Nasreen Mohamedi. Asia Archive, 2009. 2. Meena Alexander. The Poetic Self, Towards a Phenomenology of Romanticism. Humanities Press Inc., New Jersey: 1980. 3. Salima Hashmi. Unveiling the Visible: Lives and Works of Women Artists of Pakistan. Lahore, 2002. 4. Lala Rukh in conversation with Mariah Lookman, guest curator at Green Cardamom Gallery, London, 2011. 5. Niilofer Farrukh. Pioneering Perspectives. Ferozsons, Lahore: 1998.

kind of personal aesthetics. Emptying out, as the work of praise in art. IV Let me return to the show’s original refrain. How may a work, in 12

13


ayessha quraishi

I work in a way that has been natural to me since I was a child. Visually, the process is similar to that of braille. Physically, I maintain contact at all times with two materials; one is the surface and the other is paint. My hands perform two roles simultaneously; the right applies paint on the surface while the left removes the applied paint. Often a rag is used for the excess. A set of hand gestures and motions, repeated in different sequences during a period of 4-12 hours at a stretch, produce markings for a visual language. From this surface of fact, between paint applied to suggest form, and then removed to hint at the formless, the aesthetic pulse of the work is detected. Through the repetitive, the meditative may be reached. This gestural motion works through vocabularies of form and the formless, till harmony is recorded in the residue of process. In a fine-tuned silence between the performer and the observer this conversation continues. An intelligence that is aware of its own nature thus comes to realize its limitations. It delivers into a space where knowledge is non-linear, and it bears no opposites. This is a place of intimacy, of alchemy, of transformation. Underneath the skin of languages opens a book, with unbound pages of light and vocabularies in transparent ink. This cannot be translated in form or formlessness, but as its residue.

journal image oil on paper 10.6 x 16.5 in . 2012


light pg. 2 oil on paper 30 x 39.3 in . 2012

light pg. 1 oil on paper 38.9 x 39.4 in . 2012


lala rukh

I came to the ocean series in the early 90’s. I would spend a lot of time by the ocean at night during this period. I was also working with photography in the darkroom. So the impact on my art was natural. The ocean series are done on photographic paper, preexposed and darkened in the photo process. It is then worked on with different drawing media and paint. In the hieroglyphic series I and II, I employed calligraphic forms for a different rendition of the ocean. As the marks morphed, they became like coded language. This harks back to the lines of my early life drawings – the almost gestural marks which had developed in rendering the human figure. It seemed as if all the thousands of drawings I had done came together in the ocean series. I had in the meantime discovered carbon paper – which was the blackest and most beautiful surface I had worked on yet. Because it is so pristine, so perfectly black, it demands respect. In these current drawings I have allowed the paper to dictate to me. That is, the images are embedded in the paper (and in the shadows). In a sense the whole work is about seeing. Lala Rukh in conversation with Mariah Lookman, guest curator at Green Cardamom, London, 2011.

line drawing 10 conte crayon on rag paper


river in ocean, IV mixed media on photopaper 10 x 12 in . 1992

nightscape II graphite on carbon paper 8 x 10 in . 2011


meher afroz

supportive drawing graphite on somerset paper 10 x 11 in . 2012


sada I acrylic on canvas 24 x 24 in . 2012

baaz gasht acrylic on canvas 30 x 60 in . 2012


mussarat mirza

under-painting oil on canvas 40 x 40 in . 2012


II oil on canvas 40 x 40 in . 2012

III oil on canvas 40 x 40 in . 2012


naiza h. khan

My practice over the last 25 years has been centered in the self, in subjective experience. I have worked with the body for many years, and my aesthetic is grounded in an intensive drawing practice. Both concerns have been instrumental in my approach to Manora Island. That is, work based on the island is also rooted in subjective experience. This is so even as it engages with collective memory, and with mapping terrain through specific points in the landscape or events in history. The evidence of a rooted space, or site, has always been the impetus and in/visible in the conception of my works. Over a period of time, and through a deeper engagement, I feel my relationship with Manora’s landscape has become itself an internal, bodybased concept. It has shed its literal association to the site and has become something more emotive and conceptual. I think this deeper engagement began with a sense of wandering, of walking freely in a larger geographical space, beyond my own ghettoized residential enclave. I realized what I was trying to access was a wider experiential contact and imprint in my work. I was drawn to the possibility of anchoring myself in a more detailed temporality.

journal image three snowglobes watercolor and graphite on paper 5.2 x 8.2 . 2012


snowglobe under construction oil on canvas 40 x 28 in . 2012

kurrachee past, present, future (work in progress) oil on canvas. 78 x 106 in . 2013


ayessha quraishi

lala rukh

Ayessha is a self-taught artist. She currently resides in Karachi.

Lala Rukh has taught at the Department of Fine Arts, Punjab University, from 1978 – 1982. She has been part of the Fine Art Faculty at National College of Arts, Lahore, from 1982 – 2008. She currently resides in Lahore.

Solo Exhibitions

Residencies

2012

Letters From an Underground Vein

2011

Winter Academy, Fayoum, Egypt.

Read, Koel Gallery, Karachi.

2010

International Painting Symposium,

1998

Indus Gallery, Karachi.

Luxor, Egypt.

1997

The Art Gallery, Islamabad.

1996

Association Saint-Henri, France.

1995   NCA Gallery, Lahore. 1995

Gallery Ardeco Avignon, France.

Group Exhibitions 2012

Abstract Art in Contemporary

Russia, Moscow.

2012

Universal Sapience, Freiburg,

Germany. 2011

Galleria Pall Mall, London,

2011

Biennial Izmir, Turkey.

2002

Takhti Project, Toronto.

2001

Takhti Project, Sadequain Gallery,

Karachi. 2000

Alliance Françoise, Karachi.

Education

Group Exhibitions (contd.)

1976. University of Chicago (MFA),

2008

GREYNOISE Launch show, Alhamra

Chicago.

Arts Council, Lahore.

1970. Punjab University (MFA),

2006

Artists’ Voices. Body. Amin Gulgee

Lahore.

Gallery, Karachi.

2006

Artists’ Voices. Calligraphy. Amin

Solo Exhibitions

Gulgee Gallery, Karachi.

2010

Drawings 2010, Koel Gallery,

2004

Art from Pakistan, House of

Karachi. In collaboration

Commons, London.

with GREY NOISE.

2002

Let Peace Prevail: Exhibition of

2004

Exhibitions of Works: 1989 – 2004,

Women Artists, V M Gallery,

Zahoor-al-Akhlaq Gallery, National

Karachi.

College of Art, Lahore.

2001

Vasl International Artists’ Workshop

2004

Exhibitions of Works: 1989 – 2004, V

Exhibition, Gulgee Museum,

M Art Gallery, ZVMG Rangoonwala

Karachi.

Center, Karachi.

2000

PAKISTAN: Another Vision, Brunei

Gallery, SOAS, London.

2000

Scope VII, Gallery NCA, Lahore.

Group Exhibitions 2011

Scripted Across the Indian Ocean.

Green Cardamom, London.

2011

Artissima 18. Grey Noise Gallery.

Italy 2011

Non- Aligned, Barefoot Gallery,

Colombo. 2011

Imag(in)ing Cities, Amin Gulgee

Gallery, Karachi.

2011

India Art Summit, New Delhi.

2010

New Art from Pakistan, Thomas

Erben Gallery, New York.

2008

Let’s Talk, GREYNOISE in

collaboration with The JamJar,

Dubai.


meher afroz

mussarat mirza

Meher teaches at Indus Valley School of Art and Design, Karachi, 1990 to date. She currently resides in Karachi.

Mussarat has taught at the Fine Arts Department, Sindh University, at Jamshoro, 1972 – 1992. She is currently based in Sukkur.

Education

Group Exhibitions (contd.)

Education

Group Exhibitions (Pakistan 1967-2011)

1971

Honors in Fine Arts, Government

2007

Multiple Edition - One,

Honors in Fine Arts, Punjab University.

Mussarat Mirza has held more than two

College of Arts and Crafts,

printmaking show by

contemporary printmakers,

Selected International Exhibitions

Islamabad. She has also participated in many group shows within Pakistan.

Lucknow.

dozen shows across Karachi, Lahore, and

Chawkandi Gallery, Karachi.

2004

Solo Exhibitions

2007

Confluence: a show of six women

Toronto.

2012

Naqsh bar aab(image on water),

painters from India and Pakistan,

2002

International Islamic Biennial,

Her last solo exhibition, Hain Muntazir, was

Chawkandi Art Gallery, Karachi.

Kalakriti Art Gallery, Hyderabad,

Museum of Contemporary

held at Chawkandi Art Gallery, Karachi, in

2006

Message Informal, Nomad

India.

Art, Tehran.

2011.

Gallery, Islamabad.

2007

Group exhibition, Renaissance

2001

Sharjah International Arts Bienniel,

2005

Pindaar, Chawkandi Gallery,

Gallery, Bangalore.

UAE.

Karachi.

2006

Artist Voices - Body, Amin Guljee

2000

2004

Replacing Realities Series,

Gallery, Karachi.

Nomad Gallery, Islamabad.

2006

Artist Voices - Calligraphy, Amin

2001

Zindan Series, Chawkandi

Guljee Gallery, Karachi.

Gallery, Karachi.

2006

12th Asian Art Biennale, Dhaka.

2000

Fragile Series, Bretton Hall

2006

Footprints: Women in Printmaking

Gallery, University of Leeds, UK.

at Gallery Chemould, Mumbai.

2006

Colors of Life, Cymroza Gallery,

Group Exhibitions

Mumbai.

2012

Mein, Koel Art Gallery, Karachi.

2003

Inspiration from the Indus,

2010

Who’s Afraid of Theory? A critics-

Hong Kong.

artists’ collaborative, Poppyseed

2003

Laal Exhibition, Art Gallery,

Gallery, Karachi.

Toronto.

2010

Framing the Local Context,

2002

Baghdad Third International

Poppyseed Art Gallery, Karachi.

Festival of Plastic Arts, Iraq.

2008

Unseen Visions: Contemporary

2000

Pakistan - Another Vision, Brunei

Painting in Pakistan at East-West

Gallery, London.

Center Gallery, Honolulu, Hawaii.

2007

Winds of Change:

A Retrospective of Contemporary

Pakistani Art, Gallery Pratidev,

London.

Muslim Fest: Living Arts Center,

Asian Invitation, Seol.


naiza h. khan Naiza has been part of the Fine Art Faculty at the Indus Valley School of Art and Architecture, Karachi, from 1991 - 2008. Based in Karachi, she currently lectures at the Visual Studies Department at Karachi University.

Education

Group Exhibitions (contd.)

1990

BFA Somerville College, University

2010

Cairo Biennale, Cairo.

of Oxford, Ruskin School of

2010

Between Kismet and Karma Leeds

Drawing and Fine Art.

Art Gallery, Leeds.

1987

Foundation Course, Wimbledon

2009

Hanging Fire, Asia Society Gallery

School of Art, UK.

and Museum, New York.

2009

Contemporary Art from Pakistan,

Solo Exhibitions

Thomas Erben Gallery, New York.

2013

Forthcoming: Karachi Elegies,

2009

Moving On, inaugural show,

Broad Museum, Michigan.

National Art Gallery, Islamabad.

2010

Restore the Boundaries - The

2008

Arte Fiera di Bologna, Bologna.

Manora Project, Rossi & Rossi,

2008

ShContemporary, Shanghai.

ARTDubai, Dubai.

2008

Desperately Seeking Paradise, Art

2008

The Skin She Wears, Rossi & Rossi,

Dubai, Dubai.

London.

2007 Figurative Pakistan, Aicon Gallery,

2008

Iron Clouds I, Rohtas II, Lahore.

London

2007

Heavenly Ornaments, Canvas

2005

Layers of Time and Space, Ifa

Gallery, Karachi.

Gallery, Berlin/Stuttgart.

2006

bare the fact, bear the fact,

2005

Beyond Borders – Art of Pakistan,

Chemould Gallery, Mumbai.

National Gallery of Modern Art,

2004

Exhale, Canvas Gallery, Karachi.

Bombay.

2000

Voices Merge, Chawkandi Art,

2004

Living Masters - Young Voices,

Alhamra Gallery, Lahore.

2002

Threads, Dreams and Desires:

Group Exhibitions

ArtSouthAsia, Harris Museum,

2012

9th Shanghai Biennale:

Preston UK.

Reactivation, Shanghai.

2001

The Eye Still Seeks, Ivan Doughty

2012

XV Donna Biennial: Art Decoding

Gallery, UNSW, Sydney.

Violence, PAC Museum, Ferrara,

2000

Another Vision: Fifty years of

Italy.

painting and sculpture in Pakistan,

2011

Amelia Johnson Gallery,

Brunei Gallery, London.

Hong Kong.

2010

Manifesta 8, Chamber of Public

Secrets, Murcia, Spain.

Karachi.

In gratitude Ayessha Quraishi, Lala Rukh, Meher Afroz, Mussarat Mirza, Naiza H. Khan Noorjehan Bilgrami Layout Design: Sara Suleman Photography: Courtesy of the Artists Printing: Topical, Lahore Capri Foundation

Copyright 2013


This publication has been made possible by generous support from:

Supporting partner for women and the expressive arts

Profile for Ayessha Quraishi

Intimacy  

Exhibition Catalog designed by Sara Suleman

Intimacy  

Exhibition Catalog designed by Sara Suleman

Advertisement

Recommendations could not be loaded

Recommendations could not be loaded

Recommendations could not be loaded

Recommendations could not be loaded