APACHE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued) On November 8, 2013, Plaquemines Parish filed three lawsuits against Apache and various other oil and gas producers in the Parish’s 25th Judicial District Court, captioned Parish of Plaquemines v. Rozel Operating Company et al., Docket No. 60-996; Parish of Plaquemines v. Apache Oil Corporation et al., Docket No. 61000; and Parish of Plaquemines v. HHE Energy Company et al., Docket No. 60-983. On or about February 4, 2016, Cameron Parish filed six new lawsuits against Apache and various other oil and gas producers in the Parish’s 38th Judicial District Court, captioned Parish of Cameron v. BEPCO, L.P., et al., Docket No. 10-19572; Parish of Cameron v. BP America Production Company et al., Docket No. 10-19576; Parish of Cameron v. Apache Corporation (of Delaware) et al., Docket No. 10-19579; Parish of Cameron v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al., Docket No. 10-19577; Parish of Cameron v. Alpine Exploration Companies, Inc., et al., Docket No. 19580; and Parish of Cameron v. Auster Oil and Gas, Inc., et al, Docket No. 10-19582. Many similar lawsuits have been filed against other oil and gas producers in Parishes across south Louisiana. In these cases, the Parishes, as plaintiffs, allege that certain of defendants’ oil and gas exploration, production, and transportation operations in specified fields were conducted in violation of the State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978, as amended, and applicable regulations, rules, orders, and ordinances promulgated or adopted thereunder by the Parish or the State of Louisiana. Plaintiffs allege that defendants caused substantial damage to land and water bodies located in the coastal zone of Louisiana. Plaintiffs seek, among other things, unspecified damages for alleged violations of applicable state law within the coastal zone, the payment of costs necessary to clear, re-vegetate, detoxify, and otherwise restore the subject coastal zone as near as practicable to its original condition, and actual restoration of the coastal zone to its original condition. On November 21, 2015, the Plaquemines Parish Council voted to drop all of that Parish’s lawsuits, and as a result Apache anticipates that the Parish’s claims will be dismissed. The Cameron Parish lawsuits are pending. While an adverse judgment against Apache might be possible, Apache intends to vigorously oppose these claims. In a case captioned State of Louisiana and the Cameron Parish School Board v. Apache Corporation et al., Docket No. 10-18672, in the 38th Judicial District Court, Parish of Cameron, State of Louisiana, plaintiffs alleged that defendants’ oil and gas exploration and production activities contaminated plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs sought damages in the range of $7 million to $96 million, plus exemplary damages, costs, and fees. Apache, a defendant in the case, acquired its interest in the oil and gas operations on plaintiffs’ property from the former operator, defendant Davis Oil Company, and subsequently sold the interest to defendant Wagner Oil Company (Wagner). Apache has settled with plaintiffs on confidential terms, including for an exchange of consideration that is not material to Apache. Apache claims indemnity from, and has reserved all of its rights against, Wagner. Australia Gas Pipeline Force Majeure In June 2008, Company subsidiaries reported a pipeline explosion in Western Australia that interrupted deliveries of natural gas to customers under various long-term contracts. The civil lawsuits concerning the pipeline explosion, all of which were filed in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, have been resolved fully and dismissed on confidential terms, including for an exchange of consideration that is not material to Apache. All matters relating to the Australia gas pipeline force majeure are concluded. Apollo Exploration Lawsuit In a case captioned Apollo Exploration, LLC, Cogent Exploration, Ltd. Co. & SellmoCo, LLC v. Apache Corporation, Cause No. CV50538 in the 385th Judicial District Court, Midland County, Texas, in a Second Amended Petition on February 27, 2015, plaintiffs allege damages in excess of $1.1 billion relating to certain purchase and sale agreements, mineral leases, and areas of mutual interest agreements concerning properties located in Hartley, Moore, Potter, and Oldham Counties, Texas. Apache believes that plaintiffs’ claims lack merit, and further that plaintiffs’ alleged damages are grossly inflated. Apache will vigorously oppose the claims.