Issuu on Google+

D

E

S

E

R

T

E

D


DESERTED Š 2013,MARTINEZ ANDREA Self publishing bandreamartinez@gmail.com All rights reserved. This book contains material protected under International and Federal Copyright Laws and Treaties. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system 2

without express written permission from the author/ publisher.


3


C

4

O

N

T

E

N

T

S


FOREWORD

7

PULLQUOTE

9

WHAT A MESS: CHAOS AND CREATIVITY

11

EXHIBITION PICTURES

15

EXHIBITION TOUR

37

CHECKLIST 39

5


F

6

O

R

E

W O

R

D


This book it is based on a exhibition about “The Broken Window Theory�. Where it basically explains how are people influenced about the things they have and things that they are surrounded by. How does that affect in their life. It was discovered that people who live in a clean area it tends to be more healthy than the people that live in dirty areas, it affects their habits but they tend to have more imagination than the others. 7


8


In sociology, the “Broken-Windows Theory” holds that if a neighborhood or city doesn’t fix its broken windows and graffiti, the environment will continue to descend into crime, chaos and violence. —Mark Thompson

9


W

H

A T

by: Wray Herbert 10

A

M

E

S

S

:


CHAOS AND CREATIVITY

One of the most influential ideas about crime prevention to come out in recent years is something called the “broken windows theory.” According to this theory, small acts of deviance—littering, graffiti, broken windows— will, if ignored, escalate into more serious crime. In practice, this theory leads to zero tolerance of public disorder and petty crime. Both theory and practice have been embraced by some big city mayors, most notably Rudy Giuliani, who credited the strategy with significantly cutting serious crime in 1990s New York City. The idea has been controversial from the start, for many reasons, but it does get some empirical support from psychological science. Research suggests that the human mind does like order and structure and rules. Indeed, cleanliness and tidiness have been shown to promote legal and moral action, while a messy environment appears to do the opposite. But this idea may be a little too tidy, and some scientists are beginning to challenge it. If it were that simple, how should we explain the fact that order and disorder are both common states? Why hasn’t the human yearning for order, over the millennia, triumphed over messiness in society? This was the point of departure for psychological scientist Kathleen Vohs and her colleagues at the University of Minnesota. Vohs wondered if perhaps environmental order and disorder are both functional, activating different, but equally valuable, mindsets. Maybe what we disparage as messiness—maybe this physical state contributes to a varied world, and perhaps it’s variety that’s most important in shaping human thinking and action. She and her colleagues ran a couple experiments to test this provocative idea. Vohs wanted first off to explore the effects of order and disorder on socially desirable behaviors, so in the first experiment she looked at healthy eating and charitable giving. These are both things that, by common agreement, are good. She recruited volunteers and, unknown to them, had some work in a tidy room and the others in a messy space. They filled out questionnaires that weren’t really relevant to the study, and afterward were given the opportunity to donate privately to charity—specifically, to help pay for toys and books that would be given to children. Then, as they were departing, they were offered the choice of an apple or chocolate.

11


The results were unambiguous. Those who had been working in an orderly workspace were more generous. Not only were they more likely to donate anything to the kids, collectively they donated more than twice as much money to the charity. They were also more likely to make the healthy food choice. Okay, so this merely reinforces what’s been known—that an orderly environment leads to desirable and good action. But is there a downside to this mindset? In a second study, Vohs took a different tack and explored contexts in which messiness might lead to a socially desirable outcome. She figured that, since order promotes conventional values, maybe disorder promotes breaking with convention—the essence of creativity. To study this possibility, she again had volunteers work in either a neat or a messy room. Volunteers completed the same kinds of filler work as before, followed by common a test of creativity. Specifically, they were told to come up with as many as ten new uses for ping pong balls, and their answers were scored by independent judges. The results confirmed what Vohs had predicted. As described in a forthcoming article in the journal Psychological Science, the volunteers who worked in the untidy room were much more creative overall, and they also produced more “highly creative” ideas. In other words, they were more likely to break away from tradition, order and convention in their thinking. In a third study, those in a messy environment were more likely to select an option labeled “new” over one labeled “classic”—further supporting the link between order and tradition, disorder and novel thinking.

Taken together, these findings challenge the well-entrenched view of order and disorder

as too simplistic. It’s misleading to conclude that messiness promotes wild, harmful and morally suspect behavior, or that order leads to honesty and goodness. A more nuanced view would add that disorder also inspires breaking from tradition, which can lead to fresh insight, and that order is linked to playing it safe. Vohs concludes with the example of Albert Einstein, who famously quipped: “If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, of what, then, is an empty desk a sign?”

12


13


14


PERMANENT PARKING Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 15


16


VINTAGE TRANSFORMERS Analog Photography Laredo, TX 2012 17


18


PURE METAL Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 19


LADY FINGERS Analog Photography Laredo, TX 2012 20


21


THE WOODS Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 22


23


SUN BATH Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 24


VINTAGE TRANSFORMER Analog Photography Laredo, TX 2012

25


SLUMBER PARTY Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 26


27


28


LIITTLE ROCKSTAR Digital Photography Queretaro, QTO 2013 29


30


HEAVY READER Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 31


32


THE FRONT YARD Digital Photography San Marcos,TX 2012 33


34


ISOLATION Digital Photography Queretaro, QTO 2013 35


E

36

X

H

I

B

I T

I

O

N

T O U

R


• Austin, Stephen L. Clark Gallery 1101 West Sixth Street.

• Dallas, Sun to Moon Gallery, 515 Levee St.

• Houston, FotoFest Headquarters, 1113 Vine Street.

37


C

38

H

E

C

K

L

I

S T


P H OTO G R A P H Y BY: A N D R E A M A R T I N E Z

1. PERMANENT PARKING San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page15)

2. VINTAGE TRANSFORMERS, Laredo, TX, 2012, printed 2012, analog photography. (page17)

3. PURE METAL, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography (page19)

4. LADY FINGERS, Laredo, TX, 2012, printed 2012, analog photography. (page21)

5. THE WOODS, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page22)

6. SUNBATH, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page24)

7. SLUMBER PARTY, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page27)

8. LITTLE ROCKSTAR, Queretaro,QTO, 2013, digital photography. (page28)

9. HEAVY READER, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page31)

10. THE FRONTYARD, San Marcos, TX, 2013, printed 2013, digital photography. (page32)

11. ISOLATION, Queretaro,QTO, 2013, digital photography (page34)

39


40


41



DESERTED