RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
A. J. WEBERMAN
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Ron Paul quotations from the back cover:
“David Duke was hurt by his past and lost the election. How many more Dukes are there waiting in the wings without such a taint?” “There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk — an American deported to Israel who may be executed there – is innocent. And now there is also evidence that Andrija Artukovic was not the war criminal he was portrayed by to be.” “Some people even think that the government itself could have been responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing.” He would privatize the National Parks: “I would dissolve the Department of the Interior.” Paul would legalize NAMBLA “There should be no age of consent laws.”
A. J. WEBERMAN
RON PAUL AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Copyright © 2013 INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 318 3RD AVENUE SUITE 520 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10010 All rights reserved. ISBN-13:978-1470014537 ISBN-10:147001453X SECOND EDITION APRIL 6, 2013
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
LIVE LINK TABLE OF CONTENTS GET RON PAUL’S OPINION ON THE ISSUES RON PAUL AND CRYPTO-NAZISM
1 RON PAUL IS NOTHING MORE THAN A LIBERTY LOBBY NAZI
2 WILLIS CARTO GHOST WROTE THE RON PAUL NEWSLETTER
3 NEO-CONFEDERATE SEGREGATIONIST AND RACIST
4 RON PAUL’S ATTEMPTED BLOODLESS COUP
5 USING IRAN AS A PROXY TO DESTROY ISRAEL
6 ISRAEL’S NUMBER ONE ENEMY IN CONGRESS
7 SUPPORTER OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM: SECURITY STRIPPING AMERICA SO THAT ATT ACKS ON JEWS CAN TAKE PLACE
8 REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY: ISRAEL NO LONGER PLAYS A ROLE IN THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST
9 VON MISES – FASCIST ECONOMIST
A. J. WEBERMAN
10 WHAT WOULD RON AMERICA BE LIKE?
NO GLOBAL WARMING TREATIES NO ENVIRONMENTALISM NO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NO DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATIZATION OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM NO MORE GAY RIGHTS LEGAL HEROIN, CRACK AND BATH SALTS NO DEA TO BUST INTERNATIONAL DRUG CARTELS DESTRUCTION OF BLACK COMMUNITY LEGALIZING HEROIN, COCAINE, CRACK MEDICAL MARIJUANA? NO INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY RIGGED ELECTIONS BRING HOME THE TROOPS? LEGALIZATION OF CHILD PROSTITUTION NO FEDERAL LAWS AGAINST CHILD PORN NO AGE OF CONSENT LAWS NO WOMAN’S RIGHTS 6
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
NO EUTHANASIA REPEAL OF ROE v WADE NO ANIMAL RIGHTS A WAVE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST JEWS RON PAUL REACTS TO THIS BOOK RON PAUL’S FAREWELL ADDRESS
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
The Late Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch:
“Ron Paul's candidacy for President, for me, was that of a David Duke without an armband.” Ron Paul is no libertarian; he is a crypto-Nazi. Crypto-Nazism is a term implying a secret support for, or admiration of, the genocidal political and economic system invented by Adolf Hitler. The term is used to imply that an individual or group keeps this support or admiration hidden in order to avoid political prosecution or, in Ron Paul’s case, political suicide. Crypto-Nazis maintain covers such as “libertarian” and “populist” to disguise a hidden agenda. They use code words e.g. “Goldman-Sachs” means Jews. What makes Ron Paul The Most Dangerous Nazi in America is his immense popularity and the fact that he is part of an electoral resurgence of Fascism and Nazism in other Western democracies. In Greece the Nazi Golden Dawn Party got 7% of the popular vote and in France Marine Le Pen got 19% of the vote. In America Paul got 11.01% of the Republican Primary vote or 1,821,126 votes.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
This book rips the cloak of deception off of Ron Paul and exposes his true pathological genocidal self, a Nazi swine without a swastika. You can buy Ron Paul, The Most Dangerous Nazi in America on Amazon by clicking here.
PAUL DIVERTS WHAT IS LEFT OF HIS CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO DAUGHTER LORI PYEATT On March 11, 2012, according to the Center For Public Integrity, the Committee to Re-Elect Ron Paul donated $150,000 to the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, a nonprofit group Paul himself founded in 1976, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission. Carol Paul, his wife, is the group's president, IRS documents show. By law, political campaign committees may contribute unlimited surplus funds to 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofits such as the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, and there's no prohibition on a former candidate directing those funds to his or her own charity. Although Ron’s Paul’s wife gets no salary his daughter, Lori Pyeatt gets 60K a year for doing nothing. Internal Revenue Code Section 4958. Taxes on excess benefit transactions: Disqualified Persons (4) Family members The members of an individual's family shall be determined under section 4946(d); except that such members also shall include the brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood) of the individual and their spouses.
A. J. WEBERMAN
GIVE RON PAUL A RAW MILK ENEMA Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and in office or out of office he is a threat. He is not much of a doctor, and will never make any great advances in medicine as others, such as Louis Pasteur, have. But Ron Paul thinks he knows better than Pasteur. Despite scientific evidence that raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks in 2013 Paul tacitly recommended raw milk to his zombies. On May 11, 2011 Paul introduced H.R. 1830, a bill that would effectively overturn the federal prohibition on raw milk for human consumption in interstate commerce. Paul, who had introduced the same bill in the previous session of Congress remarked, “Hard as it is to believe, the federal government is actually spending time and money prosecuting small businesses for the “crime” of meeting their customer’s demand for unpasteurized milk! Americans have the right to consume these products without having the federal government second-guess their judgment about what products best promote health.” According to an analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between 1993 and 2006 more than 1500 people in the United States became sick from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk. In addition, CDC reported that unpasteurized milk is 150 times more likely to cause food-borne illness and results in 13 times more hospitalizations than illnesses involving pasteurized dairy products. This is Paul’s latest Nazi newsletter:
WHEN THEY CAME FOR THE RAW MILK DRINKERS…by Ron Paul While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be disarmed: federal agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty. Too often Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and the federal bureaucracy. 10
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Of course Paul wants to disarm Federal Agents. He is a neoConfederate who opposes a strong central government. And who decides if these laws are unjust, unconstitutional and a threat to liberty? The Courts? No Ron Paul does. He will decide if the laws are a threat to his version of liberty, “liberty” to commit genocide. For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s founder, 65-year old James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese to willing customers – in a state where raw milk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit! James Stewart jumped bail, having failed to show up for two court appearances. In one of cases, he was out on a $30,000 bail in Los Angeles County on charges of illegally selling raw milk. In the other, he was out of a $100,000 bail in Ventura County on charges of illegally raising funds for Sharon Palmer’s Healthy Family Farms, according to an article in The Complete Patient. Stewart was into the notion of the ‘sovereign man,’ which urges people to claim their ‘Common Law Inherent Rights’ and defend themselves against “all levels of abuse from Government and Statutes.” Sharon Palmer supplies Rawesome Foods with raw goat milk and other dairy products from what is known as a ‘herdshare.’ Under a herdshare arrangement, the members don’t consider themselves as buying the milk since they own the animals. Palmer has no license to sell raw milk in California, a state which does allow retail sales of raw milk but which also has very strict laws governing raw-milk production and sales. This is hardly the only case of federal agents using force against those who would dare meet consumer 11
A. J. WEBERMAN demand for raw milk. In 2011 armed agents of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raided the business of Pennsylvanian Amish farmer Dan Allgyer. Federal agents wasted a whole year and who knows how many millions of our tax dollars posing as customers in order to stop Allgyer from selling his raw milk to willing customers. On February 2, 2012 Federal District Court Judge Lawrence F. Stengel ordered a permanent injunction against dairy farmer Dan Allgyer prohibiting Allgyer from distributing raw milk and raw milk products across state lines; under Judge Stengelâ€™s order, the injunction was to be in place for a minimum of five years Stengel found that Allgyer sold raw milk to members of Grassfed On The Hill, a food buyers club, at various distribution points in Maryland and the District of Columbia in violation of federal labeling laws (the milk containers Allgyer distributed were unlabeled) and the federal regulation prohibiting raw milk and raw milk products (other than raw cheese aged at least 60 days) in interstate commerce. As a result Allgyer closed down his operation. The use of force against individuals making choices not approved of by the political elite does not just stop with raw milk. The Natural News website has documented numerous accounts of federal persecution, including armed raids, of health food stores and alternative medical practitioners. The Nazi newspaper Spotlight, that supported Ron Paul ran stories like Peroxide for Improved Health by T. Valentine, an interview with Fr. Richard Willhelm, SPOTLIGHT, August, 1986. They advertisers were the purveyors of quack cures.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
These type of police state tactics used against, among others, raw milk producers, and alternative health providers is justified by the paternalistic attitude common in Washington, D.C. A member of Congress actually once told me that, “The people need these types of laws because they do not know what is good for them.” This mindset fuels the growth of the nanny state and inevitably leads to what C.S. Lewis said may be the worst from of tyranny “…a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims.” All Americans, even if they do not believe it is a wise choice to drink raw milk should be concerned about the use of force to limit our choices. This is because there is no limiting principle to the idea that the government force is justified if used “for our own good.” Today it is those who sell raw milk who are being victimized by government force, tomorrow it could be those who sell soda pop or Styrofoam cups. Therefore, all Americans should speak out against these injustices. 13
A. J. WEBERMAN African Americans between the ages of 20 and 39 were shown to have the most fast food and supersized non-diet soda in their diet when compared with their Caucasian and Hispanic counterparts, as one-fifth of their calorie intake came from quick service restaurants. Just another part of Ron’s Paul’s ridden racist agenda.
Christopher Scott "Chris" Kyle (April 8, 1974 – February 2, 2013) was a Navy SEAL and the most lethal sniper in American military history, with 160 confirmed kills (out of 255 claimed kills). He was shot and killed in a rifle range on February 2, 2013, in Texas, while trying to help another vet get over PTSD. People were shocked at this tweet but I was not. I know Paul is a Nazi so for him Jews are the cause of all the misery in the world. Since Kyle shot the enemies of the Jews, Kyle became Paul’s enemy. After he got heat for this remark he wrote, “As a veteran, I certainly recognize that this weekend's violence and killing of Chris Kyle were a tragic and sad event. My condolences and prayers go out to Mr. Kyle’s family. Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endless unintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christ preached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies.” But one week later he was back to his original position: “The warning that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword" goes not only for individuals but for entire societies. It is a warning to all of us. A country or a society that lives with the violence of pre-emptive war in fact self-destructs.” If you have info on Ron Paul contact me at email@example.com
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER ONE RON PAUL IS A LIBERTY LOBBY CRYPTO-NAZI I first became aware of the Nazi termite Ron Paul in the late 1970’s through the Spotlight, a weekly crypto-Nazi newspaper published by a Nazi front group known as Liberty Lobby. The Spotlight repeatedly featured Ron Paul. I learned about the existence of Liberty Lobby through Phil Fellows, a rightwing libertarian who let me crash at Grover Norquist’s National Taxpayers Union townhouse. Norquist is now a big Paul supporter1 and a supporter of Muslim candidates for political office. At this time in my life I worked as a Congressional investigator in Washington, D.C. It was in this rightwing milieu that, in 1974, Phil took me to the Liberty Lobby office at 300 Independence Avenue so I could display pictures of two tramps that were picked up from a freight train parked at the back of the Texas School Book Depository an hour after the Kennedy assassination. I pointed out their resemblance to CIA contract agent Frank Fiorini Sturgis and CIA official Everette Howard Hunt. Both of these men had gained notoriety after have been involved in Watergate.2 In fact the CIA spook Howard Hunt’s identity and photograph had been revealed for the first time as a result of Watergate.
. http://reason.com/blog/2011/12/21/grover-norquist-ron-paul-is-the-mostcon 2
. Spotlight got into a legal battle with E. Howard Hunt about Hunt’s role in the Kennedy assassination after they published an article by Victor Marchetti that quoted a James Angleton memo that read, “Someday we are going to have to account for Howard Hunt’s presence in Dallas on November 22, 1963. This author was also sued by E. Howard Hunt over a similar issue. 16
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
The Liberty Lobby staff was pleased by my discovery as it could prove highly detrimental to the CIA. After I discovered they were Nazis I realized these vermin hated CIA because some of its agents and officials had been in the OSS3 and because it was pro-Israel. They asked me who I was. When I told them my name was Alan Jules Weberman, one man said “You mean Alan Jew Weberman?” . Office of Strategic Services – the precursor to the CIA that fought the Nazis during the Second World War 3
A. J. WEBERMAN This outburst of Jew hatred aroused my interest in Liberty Lobby and while working for Congressman Henry Gonzalez, a Democrat from San Antonio, Texas and an associate of Representative Ron Paul on the House Banking and Currency Committee, I began to listen to Liberty Lobby’s radio broadcasts every morning before going to work at the National Archives. I couldn’t believe my ears. It was pure Nazi propaganda. The putrid corpses of Father Coughlin and Gerald L. K. Smith had been resurrected! When Liberty Lobby announced it was coming out with a weekly publication called The Spotlight I sent in a money order and subscribed under a fictitious name. I became a weekly reader of this vile Nazi rag for counter-intelligence purposes. I vividly remember reading the list of those who attended Spotlight and Liberty Lobby functions and there was always this man with two first names, Ron Paul. Republican Congressman Ron Paul this and Ron Paul that. Congressman Ron Paul will be at the Populist Party (the political arm of Liberty Lobby) Convention along with David Duke the 1988 Populist Party presidential candidate. Congressman Ron Paul will be attending the dinner for Spotlight economist Martin Larson. On and on! It reminded me of an old Jackie Gleason bit where he would read a list of names and then add “and of course the ever popular Mae Busch!” a silent movie star that few had heard of. Ron Paul was so loyal and supportive of Liberty Lobby that he was given an honorary dinner by it. That was because Ron Paul shared its Nazi beliefs because he was, and is, a clever calculating Liberty Lobby / Spotlight type Nazi, a Nazi without a swastika, bent on the mass murder of the Jewish people and on sending the Blacks back to Africa. Paul doesn’t look the part no screaming speeches – no Hitler mustache - and that’s one of the reasons for his success. Another reason people don’t recognize him for what he is because he is a pediatrician; however Cuban terrorist Orlando Bosch and Islamist terrorist Ayman al-Zawahari were also pediatricians. 18
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Back in the 1970’s I reasoned, ‘Okay the Nazis have one representative in the U. S. Congress that no one has ever heard of.’ I wasn’t that worried. At one time the Nazis had many more but were still unsuccessful: Republican Senator Gerald Nye of North Dakota, Senator Burton Wheeler of Montana, and Rep. Martin Dies of Texas were all Nazi sympathizers if not Nazis. But in retrospect I should have been very worried. A cancer can start as a tiny lump. So I’ve known for over thirty years that the Nazis at Spotlight were Paul’s greatest supporters and he was their de facto Congressional Representative. After Paul failed to get re-elected and went on a speaking tour Spotlight made sure he got the money he needed to finance his campaign by giving them their mailing list so he could return to public office. Spotlight and Liberty Lobby was old school Nazi, 1930’s to 1940’s Third Reich Nazi, the residue of the Nazi intelligence and propaganda network that operated before, during and after the Second World War. They were different from swastika wearing neo-Nazis like George Lincoln Rockwell (seen on the left next to Dan Burroughs, a Nazi who turned out to be a Jew) and his crew of misfits and in the long run proved to be more dangerous. Many of the Spotlight policy board members had been interred, often secretly, as Nazi spies during the war by the Justice Department then released after the war ended as they were no longer considered a threat to national security and might prove valuable in the Cold War. Ron Paul wrote that he opposed their interment: As far back as the Civil War, World War I, and World War II, very often speaking out on political issues was met with law enforcement officials actually charging them with crimes and even having individuals imprisoned. 19
A. J. WEBERMAN The Spotlight scum were spies right out of the movie The House on 92nd Street. Spotlight contributor Conrad Grieb was interred by the Justice Department as a suspected Nazi spy during World War II. As documented in the book Undercover by John Roy Carlson4 Grieb ran the Nazi office in Harlem, hoping to recruit “Negros.” Conrad Grieb was the author of numerous articles that claimed it was impossible for two million Jews to have been killed by diesel engine exhaust. The Jewish Defense Organization tracked Conrad Grieb down then paid him a visit on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Grieb was no longer a member of New York City’s social elite class as he was in the 1940’s. He lived on the fifth floor of a six floor walk up. One individual gained entrance to the denied area and pounded on his door. Greib called the cops then went up the fire escape to the roof. He began throwing stuff down at us so we ducked under some scaffolding split up and left before the police arrived. Eustace Mullins, a prominent Spotlight contributor, was a confident of the traitorous fascist poet and propagandist Ezra Pound. Mullins did a book on Pound and visited him in the mental hospital Pound was sent to after the war – Pound belonged in a federal prison for the act of treason because Pound had made anti-American broadcasts from Rome but his influential literary friends had him committed instead. Mullins, who blamed the Federal Reserve Bank for everything evil in the world, was a classic Jew-hating piece of crap. In The Biological Jew he wrote that This religious ceremony of drinking the blood of an innocent gentile child is basic to the Jew's entire 4
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI concept of his existence as a parasite, living off of the blood of the host.5 Pro-Paul websites promote Mullins lies: Eustace Mullins Interview! This is quite an interesting interview from a man who introduced the world to the reality of the Federal Reserve. At the urging of poet Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins began scouring the Library of Congress for two years to write his book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Mullins is a bit critical of Ron Paul, and he also claims that G. Edward Griffin has ripped him off tremendously. All in all good, challenging food for thought. Gnostic Media Podcast #045 - A Bona Fide Conspiracy6 Tyler Kent, who was imprisoned in the Tower of London during the war for treason was employed by Spotlight. Kent was born in Manchuria where his father was a U.S. Consul. Eventually, through his father’s connections, he joined the State Department and was posted to the U.S. embassy in London. There, he became responsible for encoding and decoding Top Secret messages. With a position which required him to encode and decode sensitive telegrams, Kent had access to a wide range of secret documents, especially the communications between Churchill and Roosevelt, and he stole many of them. He also became politically active in support of the front group known as The America First Committee. On May 18, 1940, Ambassador Joseph Kennedy was informed of Kent’s treason, and agreed to waive diplomatic immunity against Kent. On May 20, 1940 Kent was arrested in a dawn raid at his flat. When officers of MI5 inspected the flat, they found 1,929 official 5
. http://marucha.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/eustace-mullins-thebiological-jew.pdf 6
A. J. WEBERMAN documents: besides Churchill’s cables, there was a book containing the names of people under surveillance by Special Branch and MI5. Searchers also found keys to the U.S. Embassy code room. Kent was specifically charged with stealing documents that “might be directly or indirectly useful to an enemy.” On October 23, 1940 Kent was tried in camera in the Old Bailey. On November 7, 1940 he was convicted of treason and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. Ed Delaney indicted for treason amid charges of working with the Nazi foreign office worked for Liberty Lobby and Spotlight. Delaney was a Nazi English-speaking propagandist broadcasting from Berlin so he fit right in at Spotlight the post-war Nazi propaganda organ.7
Spotlight and its Holocaust denying creation, the Institute for Historical Review, maintained relationships with Nazi officers from World War II. When he died in 1994, the Belgian Nazi Leon Degrelle (seen above with Hitler and Himmler), who commanded an SS Division during World War II, was memorialized as a "friend of Institute for Historical Review." Indeed, until he died, the unrepentant Nazi Degrelle published long essays lauding Hitler in the Journal of Historical Review. The Journal also published articles admiring Hitler by Nazi General Otto Ernst Remer, who was instrumental in keeping der Führer in power after the failed assassination attempt against him in 1944, and who was a featured speaker at the eighth Institute for Historical Review conference in 1987. The Journal featured articles by other, lesser-known Nazi 7
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI scum as well. Another part of the Institute for Historical Review / Spotlight group was Noontide Press. Noontide Press publishes and disseminates Nazi and anti-Semitic classics such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Mein Kampf, The Turner Diaries and David Duke's My Awakening. On audio cassette tape the titles include: Luftwaffe Songs and Stormtrooper Marches. Noontide Press's Web site offers full text versions of Mein Kampf and The International Jew, and an almost-complete reproduction in English of Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher's 1934 German children's book, The Poisonous Mushroom, including its caricatured illustrations of Jews and its obscene nursery rhymes. Just like Ron Paul, under the guise of libertarianism Spotlight, among other things, railed against the prosecution of Nazi war criminals, promoted the David Duke Congressional campaign, claimed the Mossad was responsible for everything you can imagine, claimed the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate, targeted every Jewish politician they could locate and started the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review. While all this propaganda was being disseminated Ron Paul was prominently featured in the Spotlight as you can see below:
A. J. WEBERMAN
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
These vermin were the same scum whose masters in Germany were able to mass murder at least six million of my people including my relatives in Hungary. The Jewish race had better take these old school Nazis seriously because they have proven to be adept at what they do. It is no accident that Paul has become the most dangerous Nazi in America. These are America’s smartest, most devious Nazis. Their longevity makes them even more dangerous as they wait in the wings for their moment to come when the economy collapses, when political turmoil becomes the rule. These maggots’ crypto-Nazi identities became a must because most Americans don’t want any part of German WW II Nazism since 25
A. J. WEBERMAN Americans died in WWII and Nazism involved the systematic killing women and children. As a result Paul has countless Americans fooled into believing he is something other than what he really is, which is a potential genocidal maniac. Unfortunately, the media describes Ron Paul as a “libertarian” when in reality he is as far from liberty as you can get – there isn’t any liberty under Nazism or Fascism unless you call liberty the right to kill Jews, deport Blacks and other such dark pursuits. Just as Ron Paul claims to a libertarian Spotlight claimed to be a “Libertarian” publication thus the name Liberty Lobby. Spotlight threw all their support behind Paul. Do you think Spotlight would support anyone other than a Nazi? “Liberty” is one of Paul’s favorite words. It is a dog whistle term and means right of one, emancipation from alleged Jewish political and economic domination and influence that, according to the Nazi Paul, are at the root of all of America’s problems. Some American Jews realize where Paul is coming from. In 1998 the Republican National Committee declared: "There is no room in the party of Lincoln for a Klansman like David Duke." 8 The Republican National Committee never issued a similar statement regarding Ron Paul, however, the conservative Republican Jewish Coalition declined to invite Ron Paul to its presidential candidates forum. Executive Director Matthew Brooks stated: As Americans who are committed to a strong and vigorous foreign policy, we are deeply concerned about the prospective presidential campaign of Congressman Ron Paul. While Rep. Paul plans to run as a Republican, his views and past record place him far outside of the Republican mainstream. His candidacy, as we've seen in his past presidential campaigns, will appeal to a very narrow constituency in the U.S. electorate. Throughout his public service, . http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/politics/campaigns/keyraces99/stories/duke122198.htm 8
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision for the U.S. and our role in the world. He has been a virulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure in Congress. Most recently Paul gave an interview in which he voiced his objection to the recent killing of Osama Bin Laden.9 Paul admires Osama. According to Paul: Let there be no doubt, for every terrorist identified, others will see only a freedom fighter. That was the case when we aided Osama bin Laden in the 1980s. He was a member of the Mujahedeen, and they were the freedom fighters waging a just war against the Soviet army. Of course, now he is our avowed enemy. A broad definition of terrorism outside the understanding of those who attacked the United States opens a Pandora’s Box in our foreign policy commitments.10
Then there is the Republican component to Paul’s Nazi cover. How can someone be a Republican and a Nazi at the same time? Well, Herbert Hoover had a special relationship with Adolf Hitler and . http://reason.com/blog/2011/12/01/republican-jewish-coalition-bars-ron-
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=369&Itemid=60 27
A. J. WEBERMAN met with him in 1938. Hoover was a covert supporter of the German fuehrer. Hoover would oppose America’s involvement in World War II and fight against FDR’s Lend Lease program to aid Britain. He assured everyone that Hitler would soon conquer Europe and it was better to be his friend. Hoover was the behind the scenes power of the America First Committee, leaving the public face to Charles Lindbergh. According to FDR, there could be no doubt that Lindbergh was a Nazi. Lindbergh was finally exposed when he gave his famous anti-Semitic, America First speech in Iowa. After the speech, which blamed the Jews for the world’s unrest, Hoover invited Lindbergh up to his hotel suite at the Waldorf Astoria and praised him.11
. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/01/27/444529/-TheTroubling-Legacy-of-Herbert-Hoover 28
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER TWO SPOTLIGHT PUBLISHER WILLIS CARTO GHOST WROTE THE PAUL NEWSLETTERS
As stated, Ron Paul is a Frankensteinian creation of Spotlight and Liberty Lobby. Willis Carto created both these entities that trace back to an organization intent on sending American blacks back to Africa. Starting in October 1966 two American journalists, Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, published a series of stories under The Washington Merry-go-round that recounted the findings of a former Liberty Lobby employee, Jeremy Horne. Horne said he had discovered a box of correspondence between Liberty Lobby leader, Willis Carto (photo above) and numerous government officials establishing the Joint Council of Repatriation, a forerunner organization to the Liberty Lobby. The Joint Council of Repatriation stated that their fundamental purpose was to "repatriate" blacks "back to Africa.” Ex-Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Tom Brady and various members of the White Citizens’ Councils who had worked to establish the Joint Council of Repatriation, also contributed to the founding of Liberty Lobby. Justice Tom P. Brady
A. J. WEBERMAN was the cracker barrel philosopher of Mississippi's racist white Citizens' Councils and the author of Black Monday, a Negro-baiting tract attacking the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 school desegregation decision.12 In Black Monday Brady wrote, Whenever and wherever the white man has drunk the cup of black hemlock, whenever and wherever his blood has been infused with the blood of the Negro, the white man, his intellect and culture have died.13 Brady, then a state Circuit Court judge, insisted that the Brown v Board of Education decision was "not the law of the land." Other correspondence referred to U.S. Congressional support for the emerging Liberty Lobby, such as from South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond (Dixiecrat presidential candidate in 1948) and California U.S. Representative James B. Utt. Utt made national news by suggesting that â€œa large contingent of barefooted Africansâ€? might be training in Georgia as part of a United Nations military exercise to take over the United States. Utt also believed sex education was a communist plot!14 Willis Carto created Ron Paul. In 1974 Paul started out as a delegate to the Texas state Republican convention and was also an unsuccessful candidate for election to the 94th Congress. In 1976 he was elected as a Republican to the 94th Congress, by special election to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of United States Representative Robert R. Casey. He was there from April 3, 1976 to January 3, 1977. He was an unsuccessful candidate for reelection to the 95th Congress in 1976. He was elected to the 96th and to the 97th 98th Congresses from January 3, 1979 to January 3, 1985. He was not a candidate for reelection to the House of Representatives in 1984, but was an unsuccessful candidate for 12
. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Lobby . http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/CCCitizens.asp 14 . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_B._Utt 13
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI nomination to the United States Senate. He was elected to the 105 th and to the seven succeeding Congresses from January 3, 1997 to the present. He was an unsuccessful candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. The Spotlight started publication in September 1975 and was immediately successful, increasing in circulation annually until it peaked in 1981 at an average paid run of more than 330,000 per week. Paul was unsuccessful at getting re-elected in 1976, but as the Spotlight became more powerful so did Ron Paul. Ed Crane, the president of the Cato Institute, reported that Ron Paul told him that “his best source of congressional campaign donations was the mailing list for the Spotlight.”15 The Louisiana Coalition against Racism and Nazism revealed that the Liberty Lobby was a key David Duke backer in his successful 1989 run for the state legislature, providing him a 100,000-name mailing list and directmail expertise. A Liberty Lobby staffer, Trisha Katson, also worked for Duke around that time.16 The Spotlight got Paul back in office and kept him office – in retrospect for good reason – so that their protégée could become the most dangerous Nazi in America.
In 1985 Paul began selling newsletters. The main source of subscribers to the Ron Paul newsletter came from Spotlight, where it was heavily advertised. People paid $100 a year to get the views of a former United States Congressman and unsuccessful candidate for nomination to the United States Senate. The newsletters were written from the first person. They had an air of 15
. http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-paulsnewsletter 16 . http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-0112/news/9201040093_1_buchanan-and-duke-david-duke-ku-kluxklan-leader 31
A. J. WEBERMAN authenticity about them and contained numerous anecdotes about Congressman Paul’s experiences in Washington. It is no stretch for him to have written them as he has subsequently written numerous books. Paul made more than a million dollars from this venture. If Ron Paul didn’t write at least some part of them he would have been guilty of mail fraud. But he did have help. In 2001, Paul took “moral responsibility” for the comments printed in his newsletter under his name, telling Texas Monthly magazine that the comments were written by an unnamed ghostwriter and did not represent his views. I could never say this in the campaign, but those words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my language at all. Other people help me with my newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because Barbara and I served together and actually she was a delightful lady. We wanted to do something on affirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletter and became personalized. I never personalize anything. They were never my words, but I had some moral responsibility for them. I actually really wanted to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly, but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing.17 Content analysis of the newsletters reveals an uncanny contemporaneous resemblance to articles in the Spotlight leading me to believe that Spotlight publisher Willis Carto, and not Paul’s associate Lew Rockwell,18 ghost wrote some parts of them. Carto had plenty of experience writing newsletters and his office was a few blocks from the Capitol and House Office Building. In 1955, Carto began publication of the monthly Right Newsletter and 17
. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-thought-hisnewsletters-were-pretty-great-1995/46548/ 18
. In 2008, Rockwell denied in an interview with the New Republic that he was Paul’s ghostwriter.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI established the Research Department of Liberty Lobby, which began publication of Liberty Letter in 1960. The newsletters mirrored Spotlight’s often republished Nazi propaganda in regard to the alleged innocence of accused Nazi war criminals John Demjanjuk and Andrija Artukovic:
There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk — an American deported to Israel who may be executed there – is innocent of the crimes with which he was charged by the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI), in part with the use of KGB-generated documents. And now there is also evidence that Andrija Artukovic, who died in a Communist Yugoslavian prison at age 88 after being deported, was not the war criminal he was portrayed by the OSI to be. Thanks to Congressman Bill Dannemeyer and Dave Drier, both California Republicans, the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility is now looking into misconduct by the OSI. It’s too late for Artukovic, but maybe we can use it to quench the anti-German bigotry that the Nazi specter is used to stir up. After all, the Nazis ruled Germany for 12 years a long time ago. The Germans are a great people. I’m sick 33
A. J. WEBERMAN of anti-Germanism, which is not – needless to say – a hate crime. In fact, it is – like anti-whitism and antiChristianism – an approved belief. How about a German Anti-Defamation League? In May 2011 a German court sentenced John Demjanjuk to five years in prison for his role in the killing of 27,900 Jews at a Nazi death camp but Ron Paul knows better. During World War II Andrija Artuković was named the Minister of the Interior in the newly formed Nazi Serbian puppet government. As such Artuković was closely involved in the mass murder of Serbs, Jews, Roma and the opening of concentration camps such as Jasenovac. There is no doubt as to his guilt. After the war he escaped via Switzerland to Ireland and then finally to California, where he lived until the mid-1980s. His extradition was requested by the Yugoslav (Serbian) authorities to be put on the trial for war crimes. The court in Zagreb sentenced him to death on May 14, 1986. These are the mass murdering vermin Paul claims were innocent. Only someone who condones genocide like Paul would have sympathy for these two evil murderers.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI As they did in this newsletter Paul and Carto frequently quoted Paul's "old colleague," Representative William Dannemeyer -- who advocated quarantining people with AIDS--praising him for "speaking out fearlessly despite the organized power of the gay lobby." Dannemeyer once compared Nelson Mandela to Willie Horton, read graphic homosexual acts on the floor of Congress, and infamously claimed that airborne spores caused AIDS, a disease he said was "Godâ€™s way of punishing gays."
The Spotlight supported the candidacy of the racist swine David Duke and Duke appeared at many of their events. Duke was a KKK Grand Wizard and a member of the American Nazi Party. Duke: Jews are trying to exterminate our race. I think, probably in a moral sense, the Jewish people have been a blight. And they probably deserve to go into the ashbin of history. But saying that and actually shooting or killing people in masses, are two different things. I'm not advocating extermination. I think the best thing is to resettle them in someplace where they can't exploit others. And I don't think they can live among themselves, I really don't. Let's put it this way. I question whether 6 million Jews actually died in Nazi death camps. There are two major sources for Holocaust stories. One is the Nuremburg war35
A. J. WEBERMAN crimes trial, which has been shown by all honest historians to be a farce of justice. Another source is the great body of literature and media work, and at least 90% of that material is from biased Jewish sources. 19 Ron Paul supported David Dukes bid to become a United States Senator: The Duke Victory David Duke received 44% of the vote in the Senate primary race I in Louisiana, 60% of the white vote, and 9% of the block vote. This totaled 100,000 more votes than the current governor when he won. Duke lost the election. but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment. If the official Republican hadn't been ordered to drop out, he might have won. Certainly there would have boon a run-off. Dukeâ€™s platform called for tax cuts, no quotas, no affirmative action, no welfare and no busing. "Tonight, we concede the election" he said. "But we will never concede our fight for equal rights for all Americans.â€? To many voters, this seems like just plain good sense. Duke carried baggage from his past but the voters were willing to overlook that. And if he had been afforded the forgiveness an ex-communist gets, he might have von. Liberal columnists like Richard Cohen of the Washington Post say he got so "many votes because Louisianans were racist and ignorant. Baloney.
. Evelyn Rich interview, February 1986
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI David Broder, also of the Post and equally liberal, writing on an entirely different subject, had it right: “No one wants to talk about (race) publicly, but if you ask any campaign consultant or pollster privately, you can confirm the sad reality that a great many working-class and middle-class white Americans are far less hostile to the rich and their tax breaks, than they are to the poor and minorities with their welfare and affirmative-action programs.” Liberals are notoriously blind to the sociological effects of their own programs. David Duke was hurt by his past. How many more Dukes are there waiting in the wings without such a taint?
A. J. WEBERMAN
The Nazi waiting in the wings with less baggage is Ron Paul himself, as he never openly donned the swastika or a Klan robe as David Duke did, as shown in the photographs on the previous page. Liberty Lobby and Spotlight helped start the Populist Party, which ran Duke as its presidential candidate in 1988. In that race, Duke received 48,267 votes across the nation. The Ron Paul Survival Newsletter accused Israel of being the perpetrator behind the bombing of a Berlin Disco. A LEAD BALLOON to the Reagan administration for lying about the bombing of Libya and attempted killing of Khadafy. It was clear at the time that this unconstitutional act of war was a trumped-up affair for U.S. political reasons, and now it turns out â€“ 38
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI according to the West German police – that there is no “Libyan connection” with the woman who bombed the disco in Berlin, killing a U. S. soldier and triggering the Libyan raid. If anything, she was in cahoots with Syria, or Israel’s Mossad, which always seeks to stir up anti-Arab feeling here. Paul had the same Spotlight line that the Mossad was behind terrorism and was running false flag operations. Paul knew better than a Berlin court that convicted four Libyan-connected terrorists in the 1986 bombing of a West Berlin disco that killed two U.S. soldiers and a Turkish woman. The court said the bombing was planned by members of the Libyan secret service and workers at the Libyan Embassy in then-East Berlin. The Spotlight constantly ran articles about the USS Liberty accusing Israel of deliberately attacking the American ship. A Spotlight report of November 21, 1977 purported to implicate the CIA's counter-intelligence chief, James J. Angleton, in having conspired with Israel in orchestrating the attack on the Liberty. An Israeli loyalist who headed the CIA's liaison with Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, and who also played a key role in helping Israel develop its nuclear arsenal (in defiance of President John F. Kennedy), Angleton believed the destruction of the Liberty could be used as a "Pearl Harbor" or "Remember the Maine" type incident to inflame American passions against the Arabs.
Paul took the same line in his newsletter: 39
A. J. WEBERMAN A Hero Honors Heroes Marine hero Pete McCloskey, my former colleague in the House, has always been a man of courage. The most recent example was his dedication of a new public library in Grafton, Wisconsin. Courage to dedicate a library? Yes, because of a massive and vituperative campaign against the private donors who raised more than a million dollars for the townâ€™s new library and then named it in honor of the U.S.S. Liberty. This is the first memorial to the 34 dead and the 171 wounded American sailors from the Liberty, which was deliberately assaulted by Israeli torpedo rocket, and machine gun fire in 1967 to disguise Israelâ€™s sneak attack on Syria.. The U.S. flag was flying, and previous Israeli reconnaissance flights had identified the ship as American. Not one of the survivors, not one U.S. official (at least when talking off the record), doubts the attack was deliberate. It went on for hours, and included strafing of wounded sailors in a lifeboat. But the sailors and their ship might have fallen off the edge of the earth, for all the attention they got. It was down the memory hole. `A 1995 issue of the Ron Paul Survival Report, speculated that the federal government bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.20
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI We're far from knowing everything, or even many things, about the horrific bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building. The latest rumors are tying this to the private militias. Is the government-media combine set to smear everyone who questions the wonderfulness of the federal government? That’s clearly their plan, whether or not the criminal responsible turn out to be “right-wing extremists.” Some people even think that the government itself could have been responsible. Certainly it has been worried about its waning authority and respect among the people, and such an event builds up the central government. The government would not use its own agents, these people say. Spy agencies frequently use false-flag recruitment. That is, the crazed men recruited into a 'right-wing' terrorist cell would not know they were actually working for the BAT, for example. Spotlight ran a similar story: No Way' Truck Bomb Destroyed Murrah By Mike Blair An Oklahoma grand jury has heard more evidence suggesting the federal government has covered up many facts about the Murrah building bombing. Retired Air Force Gen. Benton K. Partin has told the Oklahoma County grand jury there is no way a crude bomb consisting of a mixture of ammonium nitrate fertilizer and fuel oil (ANFO) was responsible for the 1995 destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City. Partin said he 41
A. J. WEBERMAN believes four separate charges, placed within the building, were responsible for the devastation. The Justice Department contends a single ANFO bomb built within a Ryder rental truck and parked in front of the building destroyed it.21 “Four separate charges, placed within the building?” Sound familiar? “Internal demolition?” This is what the 9/11 revisionists claimed took place six years later when the World Trade Center was destroyed. The Spotlight contained numerous articles declaring the innocence of Ernst Zundel, a Holocaust denying fat Nazi swine. This made sense as Willis Carto had started the Institute for Historical Review (IHR) the first organization dedicated to Holocaust denial. Carto even sent Holocaust denier Bradley Smith to Canada in 1984 to cover the trial of Zundel for The Spotlight. Ernst Zundel was deported from Canada and convicted of Holocaust denial in Germany. He described his captivity to The Spotlight saying, "I was held in solitary confinement with no windows, a light burning around the clock and a peephole....Sort of how Rudolf Hess was treated." Zundel spoke at numerous Holocaust denial Nazi conferences sponsored by Willis Carto. This is from the Ron Paul Newsletter: Would the New Republic, which has been sickeningly pompous on Rushdie and in its hymns to secular humanism, defend things it would find heretical? The answer is no. This liberal magazine has past defended Canada’s “anti-hate” law, which was used to fine and jail a Canadian author, Ernst Zundel, who questioned the historical reality of the Holocaust. Liberal newspapers like the Washington Post and the Boston Globe have also praised the Canadian 21
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI law and this prosecution. I’ll believe Establishment liberals are really committed to free speech when I see Norman Mailer and his cohorts wearing “I am Ernst Zundel” buttons and holding readings of his works. I personally am offended by writings advocating fascism, socialism, Communism, and other forms of special-interest big government. Many people understandably find Zundel’s writings offensive. But his case is no different in principle from Rushdie’s, except that Zundel is poor and in jail, and Rushdie is rich and protected.
So there it is in black and white, under the guise of “free speech” Paul defended another Nazi like himself. Note how antihate law appears in quotations. He called Zundel a “Canadian author who questioned the reality of the Holocaust” and not a Nazi. He wanted to have readings of his works! Note that Paul is offended by a bunch of other isms but not offended by Nazism. “Special interest big government” is another way of saying Zionist Occupational Government. More evidence that Paul parrots the Spotlight, Liberty Lobby line comes from Eric Rittberg (who is half-Jewish on his mother’s 43
A. J. WEBERMAN side). Rittberg was a former Senior Aide to US Congressman Ron Paul who defected. From 1997 to 2003 he was Campaign Coordinator for Ron Paul for Congress, from 1995 to 1996 he was the National Organizer of Draft Ron Paul for President Committee, and from 1991 to 1992 he was Travel Aide then Personal Assistant to Paul who was the Libertarian Candidate for President from 1987 to 1988. Rittberg was a top aide to Ron Paul for 17 years until he left the fold to run against Paul. Paul wrote this, “Eric, your enthusiasm for liberty is infectious. Stay that way. Your help is deeply appreciated-- US Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX).” Mark Lane, a Jew who worked for Spotlight, claimed Willis Carto never said a bad word about Jews. Rittberg stated: Ron Paul is most assuredly an isolationist. He denies this charge vociferously. But I can tell you straight out, I had countless arguments discussions with him over his personal views. For example, he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved fighting Hitler in WW II. He expressed to me countless times, that 'saving the Jews,' was absolutely none of our business. When pressed, he often times brings up conspiracy theories like FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harbor weeks before hand, or that WW II was just 'blowback,' for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy errors, and such.22 Numerous repetitive articles appeared in Spotlight that claimed Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by FDR to get America involved in World War II. Over and over again Ron Paul’s thought is nothing but pure Spotlight Nazi ideology. That is why Ron Paul, like the Spotlight scum that created him, is determined to create a situation where millions of Jews are murdered. He is a filthy Nazi pig and he
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI must be stopped. Paul betrayed his Nazism when he told Congress that America fought on the wrong side during World War II: Any academic discussion questioning the wisdom of our policies surrounding World War II is met with shrill accusations of anti-Semitism and Nazi lover. No one is ever even permitted, without derision by the media, the university intellectuals and the politicians, to ask why the United States allied itself with the murdering Soviets and then turned over Eastern Europe to them while ushering in a 45-year saberrattling, dangerous Cold War period.23 America should have aligned itself with the Axis Powers? That is the implication here. There is no doubt in this researchers mind that if “Herr Von Paul” existed in a different era he would have been part of The America First Committee or the German-American Bund two Nazi front groups. The America First Committee preached “isolationism” before World War II. The America First Committee was really not isolationist – they were a Nazi-financed front group put in place to keep America out of World War II so that Germany could defeat Russia and England. One of America First’s leaders was the aviator Laura Ingalls. During World War II she was arrested and charged with being an un-registered agent of the Nazi German government, and though she always claimed she had been acting on her own as an anti-Nazi spy, she was convicted and imprisoned for twenty months.24 Father Thomas Coughlin, another prominent American Firster, was charged with sedition during World War II. Compare the America First Committee four basic principles with those of Ron Paul: 23
. The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century, Wall Street and ... By Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins-page 161
A. J. WEBERMAN
AMERICA FIRST: The United States must build an impregnable defense for America.
PAUL: The United States must build an impregnable missile defense for America. Paul: “Preparedness is a word that has been thrown around a lot recently, but it begs the question ‘prepared for what?’ No nation attacked ours, no nation has threatened ours, no sane leader would do so as it would be the death warrant of his own nation, his own people, and likely his own self. We are prepared to repel an attack and meet force with force but not necessarily to protect our nation and the populace. We are still vulnerable to a missile attack and have done little to protect against such a possibility.”
AMERICA FIRST: No foreign power, nor group of [Axis] powers, can successfully attack a prepared America.
PAUL: No foreign power like Iran can successfully attack a prepared fortress America.
AMERICA FIRST: American democracy can be preserved only by keeping out of the European war.
PAUL: American democracy can be preserved only by keeping out of the Israeli-Iranian war.
AMERICA FIRST: "Aid short of war" weakens national defense at home and threatens to involve America in war abroad.
PAUL "Foreign Aid to Israel short of war" weakens national defense at home and threatens to involve America in war abroad.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Under the guise of isolationism the Jew-hating Nazi Ron Paul is attempting to keep America out of a war between Israel and Iran so Israel can be defeated. The German American Bund was formed in July 1933 from the ashes of previous German American societies. Wilhelm Bohle, a German undersecretary of state, organized the Nazi support for Germans abroad, consisting of agitation among German immigrants and German Americans, cooperation with other anti-Semitic groups, and direct espionage. The Pauls’ were Pennsylvanian GermanAmericans and susceptible to recruitment. Allen Goeppel and Anton Fuchs were Bund leaders in Pittsburgh. Peter Gaenger, was head of the propaganda section of the Bund there. Although FBI records of Bund membership that have been released list only the Bund leadership evidence suggested that Ron Paul’s grandfather or father might very well have been a Bund member. Paul’s Nazism runs deep in his German blood. His grandfather Caspar Paul, born in Hohenzell, Schluchtern, Prussia August 3, 1866, died [living 1930] was said to have emigrated from Germany at the age of 14. Caspar Paul was married on May 4, 1899 to Sophia Ziegler, born in Pennsylvania, on September 15, 1874, died February 22, 1964. Paul’s grandfather became a truck farmer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and eventually started a successful dairy farm. He had 4 sons and 1 daughter. His second son, Howard Casper Paul, was Ron Paul’s father. Howard Caspar Paul was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on August 19, 1904. He was married on October 23, 1929 to Margaret Dumont, who was born in Pennsylvania on March 7, 1908, and who died on July 10, 2001. Howard Caspar Paul died on May 23, 1997. He had an eighth grade education.25 When conscription started in 1940 Howard Casper Paul was 36 years old. At this time those aged 18 to 45 were immediately liable for induction yet there is nothing that I can find that indicates Howard performed any military service. Interestingly enough, Paul 25
A. J. WEBERMAN claims that it was his father who first made him aware of the plight of Palestinians: Though I was not active in politics in high school or college, I recall attending a Rotary Club meeting in the early 1950s with my father. The speaker was a college student from Palestine studying in the United States. Her story was about how her family had been forced from their property, which had been in the family for centuries, but was then used for Israeli settlements. I can recall thinking at the time that this did not seem fair to me, and it doesn't seem fair to me today.26 This story is made up. I can’t see a Rotary Club having much interest in Palestinians in the early 1950’s nor do I believe there were Palestinian exchange students all over the United States. “Settlements” didn’t start until Israel annexed the West Bank in the 1970’s.
Grandpa Casper Paul may have visited Nazi Germany. He had left Germany before the war, but he and his wife returned there after
. Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom By Ron Paul
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI the armistice. How long after the armistice that ended World War I? Were they there when Hitler was coming to power or was in power? During one of his speeches in Congress Paul stated, “The foolish entrance into World War I to satisfy Wilson’s ego led to a disastrous peace at Versailles, practically guaranteeing World War II.” Patrick Buchanan had a similar analysis: It was Wilsonism, liberal interventionism, not “isolationism” that created the moral political swamp in which fascism, Hitlerism, and Stalinism were spawned. Unable to deal with the truth – that their own heros produced the disasters that may yet ring down the curtain on the Western Civilization. In Promoting Democracy--An Obsession Whose Time Has Passed he stated: Promoting democracy is now our nation’s highest ideal. Wilson started it with his ill-advised drive to foolishly involve us in World War I. His utopian dream was to make the world safe for democracy. Instead, his naiveté and arrogance promoted our involvement in the back-to-back tragedies of World War I and World War II. It’s hard to imagine the rise of Hitler in World War II without the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler called the Germans who signed the Treaty of Versailles the November criminals and called for their death. The Nazi line is that it was the harsh treatment of Germany that was to blame for the rise of Hitler, not economic chaos or the threat of Communism or the inherent evil of the German Nazis. Paul stated: Mr. Speaker, I have come forward in the past to suggest that the history of this century has shown us that the foreign policy of so-called “pragmatic interventionists” has created a disastrous situation. Specifically, I have pointed to the unintended 49
A. J. WEBERMAN consequences of our government’s interventions. Namely, I have identified how World War One helped create the environment for the holocaust and how it thus helped create World War Two and thermonuclear war. And, I’ve mentioned how the Second World War resulted in the enslavement of much of Europe behind an iron curtain setting off the cold war, and spread the international communism and then our own disastrous foray into Vietnam. Yes, all of these wars and tragedies wars hot and cold, were in part caused by the so-called “war to end all wars.”27 There is something strange about the following sentence taken from the above. “I have identified how World War One helped create the environment for the holocaust and how it thus helped create World War Two and thermonuclear war.” “It” can refer to World War I or “it” can also refer to “the holocaust” which would imply World War II was fought for the Jews, a common anti-Jewish canard. In the rest of this speech Paul focused on the Communists, rather than the Nazis. Spotlight publisher Willis Carto agreed with Paul: Hitler's defeat was the defeat of Europe. And of America. How could we have been so blind? The blame, it seems, must be laid at the door of the international Jews. It was their propaganda, lies and demands which blinded the West to what Germany was doing.28 CARTO AND FRANCIS PARKER YOCKEY Ron Paul would not have gotten the Spotlight mailing list had he not met with Willis Carto. Carto has long been at the 27
. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1999-05-13/html/CREC-1999-0513-pt1-PgE953.htm 28
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI forefront of the Nazi movement in the United States and the Nazi sponsored Holocaust denial movement worldwide. Willis Carto was employed by the John Birch Society as a Major Coordinator for approximately 4 months in 1959. He was fired by John Birch Society founder, Robert Welch for anti-Semitism. Carto would soon join forces with Dr. William Pierce a senior research scientist at a Connecticut aerospace firm. In 1965 Pierce quit the John Birch Society and joined the American Nazi Party (George Lincoln Rockwell’s group). In 1970, Pierce, a former American Nazi Party officer and former editor of the National Socialist World, left the National Socialist White People's Party, the successor to the American Nazi Party, to join the National Youth Alliance which was originally established by Willis Carto as the "Youth for Wallace" campaign in support of the 1968 Presidential bid of racist Alabama Governor George Wallace. After Wallace lost the Presidential race, Carto renamed his organization the National Youth Alliance and attempted to recruit activists to his group. Pierce, like Paul, was a highly educated man, and that is what made both of them extremely dangerous Nazis. Pierce is perhaps best known for his 1978 book, The Turner Diaries, which depicts the violent overthrow of the “Jewcontrolled” U.S. government. The book served as an inspiration for various right-wing terrorists who grasped, admired, and attempted to implement its message including Timothy McVeigh (1995 Oklahoma City Federal Building bombing) and Robert J. Mathews (whose group, The Order, was patterned upon the white revolutionary groups in Turner Diaries.) The Order was responsible for a crime spree in 1983 to 1984 which included counterfeiting, bank and armored car robberies, bombing a synagogue, and murder – all in the service of their antiSemitic, racist ideology. 51
A. J. WEBERMAN It should be noted that some of the major participants in The Order were introduced to conspiracy theories about U.S. history through their membership in the John Birch Society – e.g. Robert Mathews and David Lane. Mathews also joined William Pierce’s group, National Alliance. Paul was a Bircher but denies ever belonging to the group, though he was listed as a subscriber to its magazine, American Opinion, according to Birch records in Brown University’s archives.29 And when he planned his first run for office in 1974, he has said, the first person he called for advice was Larry McDonald, a right-wing congressman who was later president of the John Birch Society. Paul and the John Birch Society are also 50-50 co-owners of a 3.8acre property in Sweeny, Texas that was bequeathed to them by a constituent of the congressman who died in 2010. On April 4, 2008 Congressman Ron Paul endorsed The John Birch Society in a statement from his office. His statement also congratulated the Society on being “a great patriotic organization” now in its 50th year. Paul stated, The John Birch Society is a great patriotic organization featuring an educational program solidly based on constitutional principles. I congratulate the Society in this, its 50th year. I wish them continued success and endorse their untiring efforts to foster ‘less government, more responsibility … and with God’s help … a better world.’30 Paul also agreed to be the keynote speaker at the Society’s 50th anniversary celebration, October 2nd through the 5th, 2008 in Appleton, Wisconsin.
. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/us/politics/for-ron-paul-a-distinctiveworldview-of-long-standing.html?pagewanted=all 30
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
Let Willis tell you more about himself: Willis Allison Carto was born July 17, 1926 in Fort Wayne, Indiana. After graduation from high school in 1944, he went into the Army to fight for the glorious democracy of his country, the survival of Soviet communism, a third and fourth term for Roosevelt, a chance to kill Germans by the thousands as desired by Churchill, Eisenhower and the Zionists, part of Palestine for them as a bonus, vast riches for the bankers and war suppliers, coffin makers and flag makers. He earned a Purple Heart when he received a memento from a Jap infantryman on Cebu Island, P. I. on May 5, 1945. In 1953, with Aldrich Blake, he founded Liberty & Property, Inc. and published the first edition of seven which followed of the First National Directory of “Rightist” Groups and Organizations in the United States and Some Foreign Countries. In 1955, he began publication of the monthly Right newsletter and established the Research Department of Liberty Lobby, which began publication of Liberty Letter in 1960.
A. J. WEBERMAN In 1964 he published Western Destiny magazine until he merged it with The American Mercury in 1966. In 1975 he began publication of The Spotlight weekly newspaper and in 1979 he founded the Institute for Historical Review and began publication of the scholarly Journal for Historical Review and organized the first International Revisionist Conference in Los Angeles, which was followed by ten others until 1993. The first issue of the monthly Institute for Historical Review Newsletter was published in January 1981, followed by 90 others until late 1993. He published and edited the Washington Observer Newsletter from August 15, 1965 through September 15, 1976. In 1994 he founded The Barnes Review, a bimonthly magazine of authentic history, of which he is the publisher. In 2001, he began publication of the American Free Press, a weekly newspaper. Throughout his career, he has published over 200 titles of patriotic, nationalist books dealing with different subjects. He has written under various pseudonyms as well as his own name.31 What Carto omitted from his autobiography is that Carto was a close associate of Francis Parker Yockey, a post-war Nazi intelligence agent. Yockey killed himself rather than reveal the structure of ODESSA, the organization of Nazi SS murderers who escaped the post war dragnet of the Allies. After Yockey was arrested for passport violations Willis Carto visited him in jail and slipped him the cyanide he used to commit suicide. Aside from his cellmate, Carto was the last person to see Parker alive. Check the end of the New York Times (June 18, 1960) article that I have reprinted below for his motivation in committing suicide.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
Carto wrote this about Yockey: In 1952 the State Department refused to renew his passport. Repeatedly, he applied; each time he was rejected. A game then developed between the FBI and Yockey, for the FBI had received orders to keep him under surveillance at all times. When he dropped temporarily from sight, as he did frequently, his friends and relatives and contacts were constantly interrogated by agents who—they kept repeating —“just want to talk to him.” The FBI and CIA wanted to talk to Yockey about ODESSA an organization that Yockey was a courier for: The outcome of a post war Nazi meeting in Strasbourg was the genesis of an organization; well-financed and well-organized, with the express purpose of helping fleeing Nazis escape justice. This organization was called the Organization Der Ehemaligen SS-Angehörigen (The Organization of former SS members) ODESSA. Nazi Hunter Simon Wiesenthal learned 55
A. J. WEBERMAN of ODESSA accidentally during conversations with a former member of German counter-espionage who he met during the Nuremberg trials. The source said the organization was set up in 1946 after many Nazis already had been imprisoned. Those in jail contacted friends and aid committees that had been established to promote the welfare of prisoners. The assistance went beyond humanitarian aid, a subterfuge, to abetting their escape. In short order, ODESSA, built a large and reliable network geared to achieve its ends, and began operations. Routes were mapped and contacts were established. Influential Nazis vanished as they were secretly ushered out of Germany and assisted in starting new lives under false names in foreign countries. At the end of the war, only a handful of high-ranking Nazi officials stood trial. Many who were guilty of war crimes escaped with the help of ODESSA. As Yockeyâ€™s early association with the Brownshirts of William Dudley Pelley and the Father Coughlin movement indicated, Yockey was from an early age drawn to Fascism and Nazism. Pelley was arrested in April 1942 and indicted in May for violation of the Espionage Act. He was convicted and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. In 1944, he was again indicted on practically identical charges. Yockey had himself discharged from the military during World War II (he was diagnosed as having paranoid type dementia praecox), and as a successful lawyer and District Attorney in Detroit obtained a job with the prosecution team of the Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunals in Germany, for the purposes of infiltration and of seeking out diehard Nazis in post-War Germany for exfiltration. Yockey was the first Nazi to deny the existence of the gas chambers and mass murder in his book Imperium. These fact-creations were as nothing, however, to the massive, post-war, "concentration-camp" propaganda of the Culture-distorting regime based in Washington. This propaganda announced that 6,000,000 members of the Jewish Culture-NationState-Church-People-Race had been killed in European camps, as well as an indeterminate 56
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI number of other people. The propaganda was on a world-wide scale, and was of a mendacity that was perhaps adapted to a uniformized mass, but was simply disgusting to discriminating Europeans. The propaganda was technically quite complete. "Photographs" were supplied in millions of copies. Thousands of the people who had been killed published accounts of their experiences in these camps. Hundreds of thousands more made fortunes in post-war black-markets. "Gas-chambers" that did not exist were photographed, and a "gasmobile" was invented to titillate the mechanically-minded. Keep this in mind if you doubt Ron Paul is a Nazi: Ron Paul traced back to Carto who traced back to Yockey who traced back to ODESSA and ODESSA traced back to Hitler so Paul can be traced back to Hitler, because that is where this mild mannered pediatrician is really coming from. But the way Carto describes Liberty Lobby it has no connection with Hitlerism and German Nazism: Liberty Lobby: A united voice for patriotic Americans. Liberty Lobby was conceived in 1955 as a pressure group for patriotism -- a lobby to fight the organized, special-interest lobbies (both foreign and domestic) that proliferate in the nation's capital. Since then, numerous other lobbies and groups have tried to emulate that basic concept. A decade after the war ended the Nazis began to regroup as a lobby against Israel [foreign special interest lobbies] and against American Jews [domestic special interest groups]. Not only was Liberty Lobby intended to function as a lobbying force in the nation's capital, but also as a source of information and as a clearing house for grassroots patriotic efforts around the country, both complementing and uniting their efforts. From 195557
A. J. WEBERMAN 1958 intensive coast-to-coast fund-raising efforts were undertaken. Patriotic leaders from around the nation closed ranks, eager to set the populist Institution in motion. The Nazis were offering their services to other racist, Jewhating groups such as the KKK and wished to form a broad coalition against the Jews and Blacks. A major advance came when on June 23, 1958, Liberty Lobby's Research Department was established. The Washington beachhead was thus broached. On August 30, 1958, another milestone: Liberty Lobby published the first congressional voting analysis ever issued by a patriotic organization, laying the groundwork for thousands of similar voting records compiled yearly by others. Liberty Lobby continues to issue its own Liberty Ledger, compiling the voting records of all senators and congressmen. The Nazis were conducting statistical analysis in order to determine which members of Congress could be co-opted by them. Liberty Lobby's first legislative victory came on March 6, 1959 - the fledgling populist lobby orchestrated defeat of a Senate bill (drawn up by Rockefeller Republican Senator Jacob Javits of New York) that would have barred from the mails all citizen groups which disagreed with the liberal Supreme Court. Senator Javits wanted the U.S. Postal Service to declare Nazi literature as obscene and not allow it to be disseminated through the U.S. mail. By mid-1959, a formal office for Liberty Lobby was established in the nationâ€™s capital. Col. Eugene Pomeroy agreed to serve as the Washington secretary of the office. 58
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI At a meeting in Washington’s Army-Navy Club in 1953, General Pedro del Valle, Lieutenant Colonel John H. Coffman, USMC (Ret.); and Lieutenant Colonel Eugene Cowles Pomeroy (Ret.) created DAC, the Defenders of the American Constitution, electing del Valle as president to spread the “anti-New World Order gospel” into the highest ranks of the U.S. military hoping to instigate a military coup against the Eisenhower Presidency. DAC claimed its main goal was to purge the United States of any communist influence. The idea behind the group was to allegedly organize the citizens in each state as vigilantes against sabotage, terrorism and other forms of treason, and give them a national voice. Actually these officers hoped to form their own army just as Hitler had formed his own private army called Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section). The SA (also known as Stormtrooper or Brownshirts) were instructed to disrupt the meetings of political opponents and to protect Hitler from revenge attacks. Another thing that may have been going through Carto’s evil mind was the possibility of a putsch, such as Hitler’s did with the help of the military in the infamous Beer Hall Putsch. Carto continues: Shortly thereafter, the populist Institution's founding Board of Policy (BOP) was set in motion, composed of a group of highly selected patriots of national stature. Founding chairman of the BOP was the late Col. Curtis B. Dall who assumed the post in 1960. Spotlight’s publisher and editors, like all Nazis, hated FDR because he instituted lend-lease and ultimately brought America to war against the Axis powers. Spotlight contained numerous so-called exposes about FDR and even hired Col. Curtis B. Dall, the former son-in-law of FDR, as its front man. Dall was active in New York City’s social life hosting cotillions and fund raisers for various causes as he was married to FDR’s daughter when FDR was Governor of New York. Dall had become active in politics in the 59
A. J. WEBERMAN 1940's and in 1948 campaigned for Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond, who was the Presidential nominee of the racist States' Rights Party. In July 1964 Dall was the head of the Constitution Party that supported the racist George Wallace when he ran for president. 32 As documented later in this book Ron Paul was a supporter of the Constitution Party. Because of his social position the New York Time’s obituary for Dall described Spotlight as “an anti-Communist organization.” Carto continues: Treasurer of Liberty Lobby is Willis A. Carto. He has held that office since he founded the Institution in 1955. On November 24, 1960 the first issue of the monthly Liberty Letter (a newsletter which ultimately evolved into the weekly Spotlight newspaper) was released. The purpose of Liberty Letter was unique, in that it was designed to promote political action, not just education. At this time there were just 2,000 subscribers. On January 22, 1966, control of Liberty Lobby's Board of Policy was turned over to Americans who signed an oath of loyalty to the U.S. constitution and who pledged regular financial support to Liberty Lobby. What does the last part of this paragraph mean? Why would the members of the Board of Policy have to be Americans and loyal to the U. S. Constitution. Loyalty oaths were for communists. Carto is hinting that he began receiving foreign funding for Liberty Lobby, possibly from the Saudis. The Saudis quietly passed along money to a variety of anti-Jewish groups, including those who purvey Holocaust-denial literature. To take just one example, William Grimstad, author of The Six Million Reconsidered, worked after 1977 as a registered Saudi agent. Noontide Press published the Anti-Zion by William Grimstad.
. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf? res=F10813F83E591A728DDDA00994DF405B848AF1D3
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Another possible source of Liberty Lobby and Spotlight funding might have been Nazi gold. Raubgold, "stolen gold" is the gold transferred by Nazi Germany to overseas banks during the Second World War. The present whereabouts of Nazi gold that disappeared into European banking institutions in 1945 is unknown. In addition to the gold the Nazis also stole silver from the nations they conquered. In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silver minting and selling division, Liberty Trust, today the oldest private mint in the U.S. specializing in pure silver. Since coming to Washington in 1961, Liberty Lobby grew exponentially: From 2,000 to some 100,000 paid members and subscribers at present (although for several years during the early 1980s paid circulation actually surpassed one-third of a million readers); From one unpaid employee to over 60 employees; From a rented desk in the National Press Building to its own headquarters two blocks from the Capitol Building; From an annual operating budget of $10,000 to $5 million. Numerous major outreach efforts were also undertaken during the subsequent several decades: Issuance of a special 1964 campaign report, LBJ: A Political Biography, which made history for this type of publication by distributing 14 million copies, published and they were distributed from several locations around the country. As a result of the LBJ report, Liberty Lobby's monthly The Liberty Letter skyrocketed to some 150,000 subscribers - a phenomenon unlike anything yet seen in the populist movement. LBJ: A Political Biography was a smear sheet that was put as a paid insert in many local U.S. newspapers or distributed for free 61
A. J. WEBERMAN door to door. Post-war Nazi literature had never received such widespread dissemination before! Publication of 48 special Emergency Liberty Letters highlighting major legislative emergency campaigns, urging patriots to take action on important matters before Congress. Lobbying congressional offices and appearing before congressional committees on a regular basis. In 1965 a Liberty Lobby spokesman appeared before congressional committees no less than 15 times. In the mid-1970s Liberty Lobby launched a daily national radio program which, at its peak, a decade later, was heard over more than 400 radio stations around the country. Entitled This is Liberty Lobby, the broadcast reached millions of Americans on a regular basis and helped the populist Institution grow by leaps and bounds. In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silver minting and selling division, Liberty Trust, today the oldest private mint in the U.S. specializing in pure silver. In 1975 the BOP voted to establish a national weekly newspaper, now known as The Spotlight, to replace the monthly Liberty Letter. (The Liberty Letter has since re-emerged as a regular special green wraparound newsletter sent exclusively to members of the BOP.) The Spotlight, received free by all BOP members in good standing, soon evolved into "must" reading for tens of thousands of Americans who subscribe yearly. In 1990 Liberty Lobby established the Populist Action Committee, a non-partisan, Constitutionally-oriented, America First PAC dedicated to helping patriots 62
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI seeking office not only on the Populist Party ticket, but as independents and in the ranks of the major parties. The above is just a sketchy overview of some of the populist Institution's major efforts over the years. Throughout its history, Liberty Lobby has been engaged in some of the big battles in official Washington and around the country. Just to mention a few: [Cartoâ€™s words now appear in bold type so we can compare them to those of Ron Paul] The fight against NAFTA and GATT for protection of American jobs and industry; Ron Paul co-sponsored this legislative bill: SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF THE U.S. FROM THE NAFTA. To provide for the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, (a) Withdrawal of Approval - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the approval of the NAFTA by the Congress provided for in section 101 (a) of North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act shall cease to be effective beginning on the date that is six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.33 Derailing the proposed Conference of the States, another high-level scheme to dismantle the American republic; 33
A. J. WEBERMAN Efforts to expose Bilderbergers and Trilateralists and the Council on Foreign Relations and their insidious influence on world affairs. On February 18, 2001, Ron Paul appeared on Radio Free America, a show founded by Willis Carto. Radio Free America is part of Carto’s American Free Press, which is labeled as a Nazi group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The American Free Press, which markets books like “The Invention of the Jewish People” and “March of the Titans: A History of the White Race,” urged its subscribers to help it send hundreds of copies of Ron Paul’s collected speeches to voters in New Hampshire. The book, it promises, will “Help Dr. Ron Paul Win the G.O.P. Nomination in 2012!” Paul discussed several conspiracy theories. A transcript of the show was made available through Spotlight. Here’s Mack calling from Georgia: The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations have a lot of power in choosing the American President. Do you think our elections are just a fraud on the people? Paul: Almost no one gets elected who isn’t friendly with the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. If you are not in tune with them, the national media will crucify you. So you wouldn’t win. I think the people allow themselves to be deceived.34 The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission plays into all sorts of conspiracy theories about world government and control by the elite. This elite is often identified as International Bankers, the Rothschild’s, Kuhn-Loeb, Goldman Sachs; dog whistle words for Jews. Ron Paul: You referred to who really pulls the strings. For years now, it's been claimed by many, and there's pretty 34
. If you are not in tune with them, the national media will crucify you.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI good evidence, that those who are involved in the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations usually end up in positions of power. And I believe this is true. If you look at the Federal Reserve, if you look at key positions at the World Bank or the IMF, they all come from these groups. If you have national television on, you might see a big debate about the Far East crisis, and you have Brzezinski and Kissinger talking about how to do it. One says don't invade today, invade tomorrow. And the other says, invade immediately. That's the only difference you find between the Rockefeller trilateralists.35 Defeat of the proposed Constitutional convention to rewrite the supreme law of the land; Combating encroaching power grabs by United Nations and other global government bodies that undermine American sovereignty; In 2006 Ron Paul opposed Americaâ€™s membership and financing of the United Nations and stated, This new [UN Peacekeeping] commission will create the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally into the picture as well. It is a complete new world order...36
http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/12/23/ron_paul_on_the_trila teral_commission.html 36
http://ronpaulquotes.com/concordance/international_monetary_fund .html 65
A. J. WEBERMAN Promotion of an America First foreign policy, particularly in the realm of Middle East affairs; That meant cutting off all economic aid to Israel and siding with its enemies. Ron Paul of course has proposed cutting off ALL economic aid. Defeat of the Atlantic Union, the purpose of which was to merge the United States with Western Europe; Advancement of the concept of a "Taxpayers Bill of Rights" (ultimately enacted into law); On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul also expressed his displeasure with the IRS in a New York Times interview: I want to abolish the income tax, but I don’t want to replace it with anything. About 45 percent of all federal revenue comes from the personal income tax. That means that about 55 percent — over half of all revenue — comes from other sources, like excise taxes, fees, and corporate taxes. We could eliminate the income tax, replace it with nothing, and still fund the same level of big government we had in the late 1990s. We don’t need to “replace” the income tax at all. I see a consumption tax as being a little better than the personal income tax, and I would vote for the Fair-Tax if it came up in the House of Representatives, but it is not my goal. We can do better. Spearheading the drive for audit reform and the ultimate abolition of the Federal Reserve banking monopoly; Ron Paul has stated:
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary policy. The United States Constitution grants to Congress the authority to coin money and regulate the value of the currency. The Constitution does not give Congress the authority to delegate control over monetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, the Constitution certainly does not empower the federal government to erode the American standard of living via an inflationary monetary policy.37 The fight for tougher immigration laws and control of illegal aliens. Ron Paul, Illegal immigrants enter the country for the express purpose of giving birth. But illegal immigrants also use emergency rooms, public roads, and public schools. In many cases they are able to obtain Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, and even unemployment benefits. We must end the perverse incentives that encourage immigrants to come here illegally, including the anchor baby incentive.38 These again are just a few of the highlights, but they illustrate the essence of Liberty Lobby's populist and nationalist agenda, a record of consistency and success. The Spotlight folded in 2001, due a dispute with the Institute for Historical Review over the money left to Carto by Jean Farrel Edison, the granddaughter of Thomas Edison and the heir to Thomas Alva Edisonâ€™s fortune. Jean Farrel Edison died in 1985, 37
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1124&Itemid=69
A. J. WEBERMAN leaving conflicting instructions about the dispersal of her estate. A handwritten will bequeathed the money then estimated at $40 million to a South African-born woman who was Edison's neighbor in Switzerland. Carto's Holocaust denial institute's parent corporation, the Legion for the Survival of Freedom also had a claim to the money because Edison left further instructions that only a Legion representative could open the four safe deposit boxes in Europe, Asia and the United States that contained cash certificates for the money. Three of the boxes and $20 million in certificates were found, according to Irwin Suall of the ADL, who said the fourth box in Singapore was never located. The Legion and the neighbor fought over the money in Swiss courts, finally splitting the estate in 1990. The Nazi Paul’s columns were then featured for several years in the American Free Press - a publication of Willis Carto containing the same crap that appeared in Spotlight. The American Free Press sponsored a “First Amendment Festival” in Washington DC. Only American Free Press subscribers could attend the event that featured David Duke. Duke lambasted Jews throughout his speech noting at one point that “the racial policies of Israel are more extreme than the policies of National Socialist Germany.” The bottom line here is that Ron Paul is part of a group of crypto-Nazis Carto determined to create a situation where millions of Jews are murdered. He is a potential Adolf Hitler, a Nazi bent on genocide. He must be stopped.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER THREE NEO-CONFEDERATE, SEGREGATIONIST AND RACIST
Another reason for Ron Paulâ€™s success is that he is the racist in a country with a long history of racism. He is more dangerous than the third party racist candidate Governor George Wallace. But, like George Wallace, Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proud member of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeled as a neo-Confederate organization. In a video with a Confederate flag behind him Paul claimed that the North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery. Paul also failed to bring up the fact that it was the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861. Paul had this to say about the Civil War and Civil Rights on December 23, 2007: Tim Russert: I was intrigued by your comments about Abe Lincoln. "According to Paul, Abe Lincoln should never have gone to war; there were better ways of getting rid of slavery."
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul: Absolutely. Six hundred thousand Americans died in a senseless civil war. No, he shouldn't have gone to war. He did this just to enhance and get rid of the original intent of the republic. I mean, it was the iron fist… Russert: We'd still have slavery. Paul: Oh, come on, Tim. Slavery was phased out in every other country of the world. And the way I'm advising that it should have been done is do like the British Empire did. You buy the slaves and release them. How much would that cost compared to killing 600,000 Americans and where it lingered for 100 years? I mean, the hatred and all that existed. So every other major country in the world got rid of slavery without a civil war. I mean, that doesn't sound too radical to me. That sounds like a pretty reasonable approach. Paul believed that slavery was only an ancillary issue in the Civil War: While all Americans should be grateful that this country finally extinguished slavery following the Civil War, many scholars believe that the main issue in the Civil War was the proper balance of power between the states and the federal government. President Lincoln himself made it clear that his primary motivation was to preserve a strong central government. For example, in a letter to New York Tribune editor Horace Greeley in 1862, Lincoln said: “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do 71
A. J. WEBERMAN about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union.â€?39 You can find this quotation on numerous racist websites to demonstrate that Lincoln hated Blacks. What Paul was trying to tell Congress here was the Abraham Lincoln was a racist who did not care about slavery but used the issue to save the Union. The Russert interview with Paul continues: Let me ask you about race, because I, I read a speech you gave in 2004, the 40th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act. And you said this: "Contrary to the claims of supporters of the Civil Rights Act of '64, the act did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of '64 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty." That act gave equal rights to African-Americans to vote, to live, to go to lunch counters, and you seem to be criticizing it. Rep. Paul: Well, we should do this at a federal level, at a federal lunch counter it'd be OK or for the military. Just think of how the government, you know, caused all the segregation in the military until after World War II. Tim, you're, not compelled in your house to invite strangers that you don't like. So it's a property rights issue. And this idea that all private property is under the domain of the federal government I think is wrong. So this -- I think even Barry Goldwater opposed that bill on the same property rights position and now this thing is totally out of control. If you happen to like to smoke a cigar, you know the federal government's going to come down and say you're not allowed to do this. 39
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Russert: But you would vote against... Russert: You would vote against the Civil Rights Act if, if it was today? Paul: If it were written the same way, where the federal government's taken over property has nothing to do with race relations. It just happens, Tim, that I get more support from black people today than any other Republican candidate, according to some statistics. And I have a great appeal to people who care about personal liberties and to those individuals who would like to get us out of wars. So it has nothing to do with racism, it has to do with the Constitution and private property rights. On July 3, 2004, Ron Paul was the only Congressman to vote against a bill hailing the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Mr. Speaker, I rise to explain my objection to H. Res. 676. I certainly join my colleagues in urging Americans to celebrate the progress this country has made in race relations. However, contrary to the claims of the supporters of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the sponsors of H. Res. 676, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over the hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country. The result was a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society. The federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property 73
A. J. WEBERMAN owners to use their property as they please and to form (or not form) contracts with terms mutually agreeable to all parties. The rights of all private property owners, even those whose actions decent people find abhorrent, must be respected if we are to maintain a free society. This expansion of federal power was based on an erroneous interpretation of the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. The framers of the Constitution intended the interstate commerce clause to create a free trade zone among the states, not to give the federal government regulatory power over every business that has any connection with interstate commerce. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a businessâ€™s workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judgeâ€™s defined body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife. Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years. However, this progress is due to changes in public attitudes and private efforts. Relations between the races have improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I join in sponsors of H. Res. 676 in promoting racial harmony and individual liberty, the fact is the Civil Rights Act of 74
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI 1964 did not accomplish these goals. Instead, this law unconstitutionally expanded federal power, thus reducing liberty. Furthermore, by prompting racebased quotas, this law undermined efforts to achieve a color-blind society and increased racial strife. Therefore, I must oppose H. Res. 676.40 Ron Paul’s lifelong friend and close political associate, Lewellen Rockwell argued that the Civil War "transformed the American regime from a federalist system based on freedom to a centralized state that circumscribed liberty in the name of public order." Desegregation in the civil rights era, he says, resulted in the "involuntary servitude" of white business owners. In the past, Rockwell has praised the electoral success of European neofascists like Joerg Haider in Austria and Christoph Blocher in Switzerland.
Both Rockwell and Von Mises Institute research director Jeffrey Tucker are listed on the racist League of the South's Web page as founding members. Tucker has written for League publications, and many League members have taught at the Von Mises Institute's seminars and given presentations at its conferences. One founding League member who still sat on the board of directors in 2007 is Jack Kershaw, a lifelong segregationist who once was an official in the Klan sponsored racist White Citizens Councils of the 1950s and 1960s. Kershaw has never hidden his racist views. “Somebody needs to say a good word for slavery,” Kershaw told a reporter in 1998. “Where in the world are the Negroes better off today than in America?” Martin Luther King assassination patsy James Earl Ray hired Jack Kershaw as his appeals attorney. Kershaw promoted Ray's claim that he was not responsible for the shooting, which was said to have been the result of a conspiracy of the otherwise unidentified man named "Raoul." 40
A. J. WEBERMAN This amalgamation of neo-confederates hides their racism under the worn-out guise of State’s Rights. Paul warned his followers that this dog whistle term has been recognized as such: We must not allow the term "states' rights" to be smeared and distorted into code words for segregationist policies or racism. States’ rights simply mean the individual states should retain authority over all matters not expressly delegated to the federal government in Article I of the Constitution. Most of the worst excesses of big government can be traced to a disregard for states' rights, which means a disregard for the Ninth and Tenth amendments. The real reason liberals hate the concept of states' rights has nothing to do with racism, but rather reflects a hostility toward anything that would act as a limit on the power of the federal government. (What Really Divides Us? December 24, 2002). The Ninth Amendment stated “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” The Tenth Amendment stated, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the Confederate States both contained similar language to these Amendments. Confederate racists like Ron Paul not only want to kill Jews but they also want to bring back segregation, lynchings and Jim Crow or better yet send African Americans back to Africa. Ron Paul has a redneck cracker mentality. John Patrick Bedell, the man who shot two police officers at the Pentagon before being killed was a conspiracy theorist and fan of the Ludwig von Mises Institute Facebook group. In an Internet posting, a user named JPatrickBedell wrote he was determined to see justice for the 1991 death of a Marine in California. The death 76
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI was ruled a suicide but has long been the source of cover-up theories. The writer said the case would be a step toward revealing the truth behind 9/11. Paul opposes basic civil rights law - he maintains his opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Act and opposes restrictions on the “freedom” of business owners to refuse service to blacks. So Paul’s idea of freedom is the right to be racist. Paul is a faux libertarian whose real agenda is not individualism but to prevent the federal government from restraining the darker racist impulses at work at the state and local levels. The following is from the Ron Paul newsletter: The Double Standard We know about the crimes at Bensonhurst and Howard Beach because of press propaganda and because great oddities took place in each: white on black crime. Virtually all inter-racial crime is black on white, not white on black. When blacks kill whites, however, it's not defined as news. A month after the Bensonhurst killing, points out Jared Taylor, an almost identical crime was committed in the Bronx. A white got out of his car to use a phone. Two blacks asked him what a honkey was doing on Tremont Avenue, shouted at him, and then shot him in the stomach. There were “no marches, no outbursts, no handwringing, and hardly any press coverage.” When a black minister who helped stir up the Bensonhurstomania was asked about it, he said it wasn’t racism it was “revenge.” Race and Crime We hear lots about black-on-black crime. But what about interracial crime? One out of ten of those 77
A. J. WEBERMAN crimes is white on black, whereas nine out of ten is black on white. This is even more impressive, in a negative sense, where you realize that blacks are only 12% of the population. Criminologist Jared Taylor reports that if you subtract the crimes committed by blacks for the overall U.S. crime rate, we have no more crime proportionately than Western Europe and less than Britain. Who is Jared Taylor? Jared Taylor is a follower of the eugenicist William Shockley who stated “My research leads me inescapably to the opinion that the major cause of the American's Negros intellectual and social deficits is hereditary and racially genetic in origin and thus not remediable to a major degree by practical improvements in environment.”41 Shockley believed that the Nazi’s picked the wrong race to mass murder as the Jews were intellectually superior to most Germans. If you watch the Nazi propaganda film The Eternal Jew you will find that some of the German hatred for Jews is based on the fact that they came over to Germany with nothing and were able to accumulate wealth by first starting out selling merchandise from their pockets, then from a tray, then from a pushcart and finally from a store or chain of stores. They became professionals like doctors and lawyers while the German dunkoffs remained peasants. Jared Taylor claims he has no problem with Jews and that they are White however the Jewish Defense Organization of which I am a member opposes all forms of racism. I have personally had Jared Taylor’s racist meetings cancelled for two years in a row. Taylor wants to sterilize Black women and has received grants from the Pioneer Fund as has Willis Carto. The Pioneer Fund was started in 1937 and was closely aligned with Nazi Germany. Jared Taylor is 41
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI described as a “criminologist” by Ron Paul and his newsletter gave out subscription information about Taylor’s publications. Llewellyn Rockwell published Jared Taylor’s article “Hate Crimes Laws Miss the Point Indeed, They are Instruments of Totalitarianism.” Another way to get rid of people with African blood is to refuse medical aid to Africa while it is experiencing an AIDS epidemic. On July 24, 2008 Ron Paul stated: Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this irresponsible legislation, which will ship $48 billion overseas as foreign aid at a time when Americans are feeling the pressure of rapidly increasing inflation and a weakened dollar. It is particularly objectionable to ship money to fund healthcare overseas when so many Americans either struggle with high healthcare costs or avoid seeking medical assistance altogether due to lack of insurance or funds. As we know, the federal government does not have $48 billion to send overseas so it will have to print the money. It is a cruel irony that this will add to inflation at home which will increase even further the costs of healthcare in the United States. Mr. Speaker, I am saddened by the prevalence of disease in impoverished countries overseas. I certainly encourage every American concerned about HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria overseas to voluntarily provide assistance to help alleviate the problem. But I do not believe it is appropriate -- nor is it Constitutional -- to forcibly take money from American citizens to send abroad. I urge my colleagues to reject this and all foreign aid legislation.42 More Haitians?
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=104&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN If there is one thing we don’t need in this country, its more Haitians immigrants with AIDS. Congratulations to the Senate for stopping, at least temporarily, Clinton’s plan to have the AIDSians move here to die at $100,000 a pop, courtesy of the taxpayers. But what does it tell us about Clinton that he would like all the Haitians, AIDS carriers and otherwise, to go on U.S. welfare in Florida? That he hates the real America. Jesse Jackson went on a hunger strike to protest the idea of keeping the Haitians in Haiti, or at least out of the U.S. Unfortunately he went off the diet. As usual his motive seems to be pure malice toward white people. Paul didn’t want to help the Haitians out after a devastating earthquake. On January 21, 2010 he claimed that this was for financial reasons but as you can see from the above excerpt from his newsletter he hated Haitians long before this national disaster struck: I rise in reluctant opposition to this resolution. Certainly I am moved by the horrific destruction in Haiti and would without hesitation express condolences to those who have suffered and continue to suffer. As a medical doctor, I have through my career worked to alleviate the pain and suffering of others. Unfortunately, however, this resolution does not simply express our condolences, but rather it commits the US government “to begin the reconstruction of Haiti” and affirms that “the recovery and long-term needs of Haiti will require a sustained commitment by the United States….” I do not believe that a resolution expressing our deep regret and sorrow over this tragedy should be used to commit the United States to a “long-term” occupation 80
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI of Haiti during which time the US government will provide for the reconstruction of that country. I am concerned over the possibility of an open-ended US military occupation of Haiti and this legislation does nothing to alleviate my concerns. On the contrary, when this resolution refers to the need for a long term US plan for Haiti, I see a return to the failed attempts by the Clinton and Bush Administrations to establish Haiti as an American protectorate. Already we are seeing many argue that this kind of humanitarian mission is a perfect fit for the US military. I do not agree. Certainly I would support and encourage the efforts of the American people to help the people of Haiti at this tragic time. I believe that the American people are very generous on their own and fear that a US government commitment to reconstruct Haiti may actually discourage private contributions. Mr. Speaker, already we see private US citizens and corporations raising millions of dollars for relief and reconstruction of Haiti. I do not believe the US government should get in the way of these laudable efforts. I do express my condolences but I unfortunately must urge my colleagues to vote against this resolution committing the United States government to rebuild Haiti.43 In Stay out of Sudan's Civil War House Amendments to Comprehensive Peace in Sudan Act 11/19/04 he stated: The fact is we do not know and cannot understand the complexities of the civil war in Sudan, which has lasted for 39 of that country’s 48 years of existence. Supporters of our intervention in Sudan argue that this is a clear-cut case of Sudan’s Christian minority being oppressed and massacred by the Arab majority in the Darfur region. It is interesting that the CIA’s 43
A. J. WEBERMAN World Factbook states that Sudan’s Christians, who make up five percent of the population, are concentrated in the south of the country. Darfur is a region in the mid-western part of Sudan. So I wonder about this very simplistic characterization of the conflict.44 Paul’s newsletters were filled with racist attacks on blacks: “Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks,” read a typical article from the June 1992 “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism,” a supplement to the Ron Paul Political Report. Racial apocalypse was the most persistent theme of the newsletters; a 1990 issue warned of “The Coming Race War.” George Lincoln Rockwell, the neo-Nazi leader of the American Nazi Party: Believed a race war was imminent. He expressed horror at the prospect of interracial carnage on American soil but actually welcomed it as a necessary element of the social chaos that would sweep him to power. “Commander Rockwell was positive” a follower wrote, that the Blacks were going to go on an all-out rampage before the decade of the Sixties as out, and touch off the race war that so many talked about in those days," To a boyhood friend not involved in American Nazi Party politics Rockwell confided: "I am convinced that the world is building to a Race War, in which we are outnumbered ten to one, we are divided and decadent, while the colored races are hard and getting harder.” The terror of that race war Rockwell believed would drive the American people to turn to him as the only politician tough enough to protect their interests. For
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=219&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Rockwell, the coming race war was but one battle in the larger war with the Jew.45 On August 30, 1979 Paul praised the magazine The American Mercury: “Mr. Bruce, I found all the articles you sent me from the American Mercury very interesting.” Russell Maguire, who owned the Thompson Submachine Gun Company, became owner of the American Mercury in August 1952. In 1952 George Lincoln Rockwell became its editor. Maguire sold the Mercury to the Defenders of the Christian Faith, Inc., owned by Reverend Winrod and located in Wichita, Kansas, in 1961. Reverend Winrod was known as "The Jayhawk Nazi" during World War II, and was tried and convicted for violations of the Sedition Act of 1918. In 1966 the magazine merged with Willis Carto and Roger Pearson’s Western Destiny. Pearson was a well known neo-Nazi and pro-Fascist who headed up the World AntiCommunist League during its most blatantly pro-Fascist periods. Pearson was a close associate of Wickliffe Draper, founder of the Pioneer Fund and was the largest recipient of Pioneer Fund grants in history. By then The American Mercury was a quarterly with a circulation of barely 7,000, and its editorial content was composed almost entirely of attacks upon Jews, African Americans, and other minorities. A 1978 American Mercury article praised Adolf Hitler as the "greatest Spenglerian." The spring 1980 issue celebrated H. L. Mencken's centennial, and lamented the passage of his era, "before the virus of social, racial, and sexual equality" grew in "fertile soil in the minds of most Americans." The issue of The American Mercury Paul praised included essays entitled, “You Can't Escape the Kosher Food Tax,” “Are You Ready for the White Man's Doomsday,” and “Racism - Black African Style.” The last issue concluded with a plea for contributions to build a computer index — 45
.http://books.google.com/books? id=KAU2E4fFC10C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Simonelli&hl=en&sa=X&ei=R 0kcT8jyIaXl0QG1_KjWCw&ved=0CFEQ6AEwAg
A. J. WEBERMAN with information about the 15,000 most dangerous political activists, actual or alleged, in the United States. An article the following year in the Ron Paul / Willis Carto newsletter was about disturbances in the Adams Morgan neighborhood of Washington, D.C., and was entitled Animals Take Over the D.C. Zoo. Another newsletter reported on the heretofore unknown phenomenon of “Needlin’,” in which “gangs of black girls between the ages of 12 and 14” roamed the streets of New York and injected white women with possibly HIV-infected syringes. “Needlin’” “Needlin’,” a new form of racial terrorism, has struck New York City streets on the Upper West Side. At least 39 white women have been stuck with used hypodermic needles–perhaps infected with AIDS–by gangs of black girls between the ages of 12 and 14. The New York Times didn’t find this fit to print for weeks and weeks, until its candidate David Dinkins was safely elected. Even then the story was very low key, with race mentioned many paragraphs into it. Who can doubt that if the situation had been reversed, if white girls had done this to black women, we would have been subjected to months-long nation-wide propaganda campaign on the evils of white America? The double standard strikes again. Another newsletter stated: Today, gangs of young blacks bust into a bank lobby firing rounds at the ceiling. We don’t think a child of 13 should be held as responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI and culpable as any adult, and should be treated as such. Paul vilified Dr. Martin Luther King Jr: So now even the establishment press admits that Martin Luther King plagiarized his PhD dissertation, his academic articles, his speeches, and his sermons. He was also a comsymp, if not an actual party member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration. King, the FBI files show, was not only a world-class adulterer, he also seduced underage girls and boys. The Rev. Ralph David Abernathy revealed before his death that King had made a pass at him many years before. And we are supposed to honor this "Christian Minister" and lying socialist satyr with a holiday that puts him on par with George Washington? Congratulations to Arizona! Who could doubt that the result would be exactly the same if the other 49 states could also vote on a holiday for this affirmative action saint? Paul attacked Ronald Reagan for signing legislation creating the federal holiday in his name, complaining, “We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day.” Paul had this to say about King: St. Martin was a world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours ("non-violence" didn't apply in all spheres, I guess). He was a flagrant plagiarist with a phony doctorate. He replaced forced segregation in a few states with forced integration 85
A. J. WEBERMAN in all states. And he was a dedicated socialist. What a guy. He probably deserves two holidays. Why, he often asked "is it that people have to pay water bills in a world that is two-thirds water?" (Forget a PhD. Give this man an IQ test.) Capitalism, he said, has "left a gulf between superfluous wealth and abject poverty, has created conditions permitting necessities to be taken from the many to give luxuries to the few, and has encouraged small hearted men to become cold and conscienceless." As compensation, he advocated paying blacks "about fifty billion" -- $250 billion in today's dollars -- per year for ten years, although all the wealth in the country "could not adequately compensate its Negroes for his centuries of exploitation and humiliation." King advocated racial quotas: "If a city has a 30% Negro population," then "Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and join in all categories." And David Garrow's Pulitzer Prize-winning biography reports that King "made it clear to close friends" that he considered himself a Marxist." Even his ballyhooed "non-violence" was a tactic. He wanted to take power like Castro did, "but a violent revolution on the part of American blacks would find no sympathy and support from the white population." So he adopted non-violence as a "strategy for change, a tactical program." The official line among some conservatives and libertarians is that the civil rights movement 86
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI started out well, but went astray after King's death. In fact, it was bad from the beginning, never seeking the mere removal of Jim Crow laws, which would have been legitimate, but forced integration and wealth redistribution. In 1988 when I ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket, I was berated for hours by LP members because I had refused to vote, while in Congress, for a Martin Luther King national holiday. I didn't know then about his plagiarism, but the rest of King's crimes were clear. J. Edgar Hoover once called his "the most dangerous man in America." Who could have known the danger would continue after his death and threaten to strangle our culture? Perhaps, the most damnable lie that Ron Paul tells about race in the US is his claim that Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks are amongst his greatest heroes. Of course, there's not an ounce of truth in either claim. For one thing, he voted against honoring either of them - twice against making King's birthday a holiday, and once against honoring Rosa Parks with the Congressional Gold Medal. In 2012 the lying racist pig said this: One of my heroes is Martin Luther King because he practiced the libertarian principle of peaceful resistance and peaceful civil disobedience, as did Rosa Parks. But also, I’m the only one up here — and the only one in the Republican Party — that understands true racism in this country is in the judicial system, and it has to do with enforcing the drug laws. Look at the percentages. The 87
A. J. WEBERMAN percentage of people who use drugs are about the same with blacks and whites. And yet the blacks are arrested way disproportionately. “Arrested disproportionately?” Paul really believes that they are not as he stated: Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational. After Barak Obama was re-elected by a few populous states some people in the states that went for Romney began talking secession. Paul was widely quoted on the subject: Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there is a so-called right to secession, but it is a very legitimate issue to debate because all of the states that came into the Union before the Civil War believed they have a right to secede and New England in the early part of the 19th century actually considered it, and nobody questioned them about whether they had the right to do it or not. Since the Civil War, it’s been sort of a dead issue, but he brought it up. It stirred the media and believe me, it really stirred some of the liberal media where they started really screaming about what is going on here. “This is un-American”, I heard one individual say, “This is treasonous to even talk about it.”
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER FOUR PAUL’S ATTEMPTED BLOODLESS COUP
Ron Paul is estimated to have 150 to 200 delegates bound to him at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida plus control over four state delegations. According to RNC Rule 40, Paul needed a plurality of delegates from five states for his name to be put forth for nomination at the convention. Nebraska was the last state to hold a convention and its 32 delegates were not required to 89
A. J. WEBERMAN match the primary, where Romney won 70% of the vote. However, prospective delegates must indicate their presidential preference and are bound to vote for that candidate for the first two ballots. Paul failed to win a plurality of delegates in Nebraska in fact he only won one! Had he succeeded it would have forced a roll call vote where each delegate of each state would have been polled on the floor of the convention. If Paul had succeeded in Nebraska it also would have meant getting a prime time 15-minute speaking slot, perhaps a promise of a Cabinet position, and, of course, influencing the GOP platform to further his Crypto-Nazi agenda. Since this was Paul’s last chance to pull off a bloodless putsch and become President, Nebraska Republican Party officials, for the first time, hired security46 for the convention to ward off any disruptions that have occurred at state conventions such as the one in Arizona, where Paul supporters got into a shouting match with Romney supporters. DELEGATE POACHING & THE DESTRUCTION JEFFERSONIAN DEMOCRACY Although he got about 11% of the Republican Primary popular vote47 Paul was able to amass a disproportionate number of delegates to the Republican Convention by poaching the votes where the delegates were unbound. In this way these “libertarians” were able to deprive citizens of their liberty to elect the candidates of their choice. The liberty to deprive others of their liberty is the liberty of Ron Paul and his robot like storm troopers. In Louisiana Paul’s slime balls did a great job of “spreading liberty” and deprived people of the right to have their vote count. Paul received only 6% of the popular vote yet Paul dominated the 46
. http://siouxcityjournal.com/ap/politics/nebraska-gop-hires-security-forstate-convention/article_4244033a-e9d9-51a4-bcba-8044b857707d.html 47 . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presid ential_primaries
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Louisiana Republican caucuses. He captured 27 of the 46 delegates to which Louisiana is entitled. Paul supporters also elected one of their own, Henry Herford, to a senior party post. Week after week, Paul forces use GOP rules48 to dominate or exert a large influence at state Republican conventions and send pro-Paul delegates to the national GOP convention.49 Louisiana was no fluke. At the Nevada Republican convention Paul won 22 of a possible 25 delegates to the national convention yet he came in third with less than 19 percent of the vote. In Iowa after what the Des Moines Register described as a "two-day tug-of-war marked by bouts of angry shouting,"50 Paul supporters walked away with 23 of 28 total delegates to send to Augustsâ€™ Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida.51 How do these Ron Paul Stormtroopers manage to round up delegates? Through physical intimidation! In Saint Peters County Missouri a Blackman, Eugene Dokes, who, as chairman of the county's GOP committee, played a key role in leading the caucus. But Dokes said he grew concerned Saturday after supporters of White House hopeful Ron Paul were "beginning to get physical." "At one point there was four or five people surrounding me," Dokes recalled Sunday. "I didn't think it was safe." This is how a Nazi who used the name Lone Guard was there as a Ron Paul supporter and later posted, The lying, cowardly negro who single handedly embarrassed the GOP by shutting down the largest caucus in Missouri because he didn't want any Ron 48
. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-WalshsWashington/2012/06/04/ron-paul-snatches-half-of-louisianas-delegates 49
. http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-WalshsWashington/2012/06/04/ron-paul-snatches-half-of-louisianasdelegates 50
. http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2012/06/16/paulbackers-triumphant-at-iowa-gop-convention/ 51
. http://www.cbsnews.com/8334-503544_162-57454852-503544/doespauls-iowa-delegate-sweep-indicate-brighter-days-ahead-for-libertarians/ 91
A. J. WEBERMAN Paul delegates is now claiming Ron Paul supporters are threatening his family, according to Brent Stafford, the man who Dokes had arrested. Ron Paul’s followers were able to subvert democracy by misusing the Electoral College system. This does not bother them. Democracy is something they profess to disbelieve in. Yet, at the same time, Ron Paul’s storm trooper’s claim they want a Jeffersonian democracy. Thomas Jefferson favored a nation with most powers reserved for the states. He was opposed to a strong central authority and believed that the people were the final authority in government. Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” Before my DNS was banned from the website the Daily Paul I noticed numerous posts that stated: “This is a Republic not a Democracy.” Republic is a buzzword for where it is permissible for a minority to rule over a majority through an Electoral College system. In reality all the word Republic means is that a country is not an aristocracy. We are both a Republic and Democracy. So the Pauloids are elitists and Hamiltonians, not Jeffersonians. They are also found of this quotation “James Madison said Democracy is the tyranny of the majority.” This is from The Daily Paul: Even though Ron Paul lost the popular vote in every state so far, he has now won the majority of the delegates in 11 states. And the delegate count happens to be the only thing that matters when it comes to electing nominees. Thank you Founding Fathers for the Electoral College system. And thank you Ron Paul people who have used that system as the Founding Fathers' intended.52 Ron Paul supporters have no compunctions about their activities because they are not libertarians. Libertarians would not 52
. http://www.dailypaul.com/231888/ron-paul-has-won-11-statesvideo 92
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI be depriving people of their liberty, their freedom to choose political leaders by depriving them of their vote. The Founding Fathers intended to use the Electoral College System to protect democracy from the Irish urban poor turning it into mob rule. The voters the Pauloids disenfranchised were middle class Republican voters, not the illiterate Black Irish the Founding Fathers had in mind. The Pauloids are not using the system, they are playing the system. The Nazis are old hands at subverting democracy. They did it in Germany with the passage of the Enabling Act. The Enabling Act was passed by Germany's Reichstag and signed by President Paul von Hindenburg on March 23, 1933. It was the second major step, after the Reichstag Fire Decree, through which Chancellor Adolf Hitler legally obtained plenary powers and established his dictatorship. It received its name from its legal status as an enabling act granting the Cabinet the authority to enact laws without the participation of the Reichstag. If the Pauloids took control of Congress they could conceivably do it here, although it would require a Constitutional Amendment. What sociological groups comprise Ron Paulâ€™s supporters? One group of Ron Paul Slime balls is comprised of hardcore Nazi scum, like Don Black and his son see with Paul on the following page.
A. J. WEBERMAN
The mass murderer of six people in Wisconsin at a Sikh temple, Wade Michael Page, was a participant in bands that performed Nazi and skinhead music. Page started two bands – Definite Hate and End Apathy. These bands were heavily advertised on Don Black’s website, Stormfront. Interestingly enough the slogan end apathy is often used by Ron Paul followers as you can see HERE. This group of Ron Paul supporters consists of racists, fascists, eugenicists, Skinheads, Klansmen and Nazis. They realized that a vote for Ron Paul, even though he doesn’t spell it out, is a vote to kill Jews and deport Blacks. These vermin know that the only difference between Ron Paul and Adolf Hitler is that Hitler put his platform forward in plain German, shouted it at the German people and made it clear to them that all the Jews in Europe were going to die under his rule. Millions of Germans understood what the final solution to the Jewish problem meant and supported it. These post-war hardcore Jew-haters understand that Paul can’t announce that publically here and get away with it. The media, the ADL, WWII veterans would be all over him. It would be political suicide. These wanna be mass murderers know that Ron Paul is forced to candy-coat his Nazi beliefs using dog whistle words like “no foreign entanglements” when he means disown Israel and let it be destroyed. Dog-whistle politics, also known as the use of code words, is a term for a type of political campaigning or speechmaking which employs coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different or more specific meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience. The term is used to refer to messages with an intentional subtext. The key to its use is to maintain the option of "plausible deniability." For example the 94
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI phrase "states' rights", although literally referring to powers of individual state governments in the United States, are "code words" for institutionalized segregation and racism. In January 2012 Ron Paul was a hot topic on the talk radio show hosted by Nazis Don Black and his son Derek. But Paul and Black go back further than that. In 1981, a lawyer tried to subpoena Ron Paul to testify in the trial of Black,53 then a Grand Wizard for the Ku Klux Klan who would later go on to found the white supremacist, neo-Nazi website, Stormfront. Black was charged along with two other Klansmen with planning to violently overthrow the small Caribbean country of Dominica in what they called Operation Red Dog. An examination of Operation Red Dog revealed that in 1981 a group of American and Canadian White supremacists led by Klansman and mercenary, Michael (Mike) Perdue planned on taking over a small West Indian country called Dominica by overthrowing the government and Prime Minister Eugenia Charles and restoring its previous prime minister, Patrick Johns into power. The group planned to create an Aryan paradise in Dominica and make money through casinos, cocaine and brothels.54 On the day the group of white supremacists was supposed to travel to Dominica, they were arrested by ATF agents and were found with over thirty automatic weapons, shotguns, rifles, handguns, dynamite, ammunition, a confederate flag and a Nazi flag. The plan would be dubbed The Bayou of Pigs after the failed invasion of Cuba. The leader of the group, Michael Perdue, would plead guilty to planning the coup and turned stateâ€™s evidence. Perdue would testify that several other people helped organize and fund the coup and that two Texas politicians were aware of the plan. Among those Perdue implicated were David Duke, former Texas Governor, John Connally and Congressman, Ron Paul whom he claimed knew 53
. http://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/14/us/judge-denies-connallysubpoena-in-trial-of-3-alleged-mercenaries.html 54
. The Ku Klux Klan in Mississippi: A History By Michael Newton Page 192
A. J. WEBERMAN about the plot. Connally was credited with helping Paul win his first congressional election.55 A judge refused to subpoena Paul and Connally despite the fact that Perdue had claimed that both of them were aware of the plot. Don Black’s friend and fellow KKK Grand Wizard, David Duke was called to testify before a grand jury but claimed that he would take the Fifth Amendment and never appeared. While Duke was never charged with a crime, several books points to Duke as the organizer who connected Perdue to the other mercenary Klansmen and the people who funded their endeavor.56 Everyone else implicated by Perdue was charged with the plot. Perdue implicated three men as funders of the plot, L .E. Matthews of Jackson, Mississippi, James C. White of Houston, and David Duke’s close friend and backer, J. W. Kirkpatrick. Kirkpatrick would kill himself before he could stand trial and White and Matthews would be acquitted in court. Former Prime Minister of Dominica, Patrick Johns would be sentenced to 12 years in prison for his part of the plot. Michael Perdue, Don Black and seven other Klansmen would be sentenced to only 3 years in prison. Ron Paul has never made a statement denying knowledge of the plot despite the fact that he was implicated by Perdue and almost subpoenaed. Paul was photographed with Black and his son by David Duke’s former assistant, Jamie Kelso57 who was an organizer for Ron Paul and the owner of white supremacist sites, WhiteNewsNow.com and TheWhiteRace.com and a moderator for Black’s neo-Nazi website, Stormfront.58 55
. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf? res=F30A12FA395F167493CAAB178FD85F428785F9 56
. The Rise of David Duke By Tyler Bridges page 98
. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligencefiles/profiles/jamie-kelso 58 . http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/ron-paul-wasimplicated-in-attempted-white-supremacist-island-invasion/ 96
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Black would become one of Paul’s most enthusiastic supporters and helped rally the white supremacist community around Paul, through Stormfront. Black said he received Paul’s Nazi newsletters when they were first published and described how the publications were perceived by members of the Nazi movement. KKK Grand Wizard and former Louisiana Congressman David Duke phoned in to Don Black’s internet radio show and explained why he’s voting for Paul. Black told him: Everybody, all of us back in the 80’s and 90’s, felt Ron Paul was, you know, unusual in that he had actually been a Congressman, that he was one of us and now, of course, that he has this broad demographic–broad base of support. Black donated to Mr. Paul in 2007 and in 2011 it was revealed that Black donated $500 dollars to the Ron Paul Presidential campaign. Black told The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur that he supported Paul’s presidential candidacy.59 Ron Paul’s campaign refused to reject the donation and return it. This is from Stormfront: Re: Is Ron Paul listening to David Duke's radio in his closet? Ron Paul could certainly be a White Nationalist, but if he ever made any sign of this he would be done. The second the public hears "white nationalist", they immediately think of "NAZI" "RACIST" "HOLOCAUST", and Ron Paul would be over with. Regardless of his views though; he is certainly on our side. Paul was asked about this: “If they want to endorse me, they’re endorsing what I do or say — it has nothing to do with endorsing what they say.” But if the Nazis are endorsing what Paul has to say there must be some areas of agreement between them.
. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/28/stormfront-founder-ronpauls-views-coincide-with-ours-on-most-issues/ 97
A. J. WEBERMAN Paul received support from other White Supremacist groups: When Anonymous hacked a white supremacist website known as American 3rd Position (A3P) the anti-Nazi fighters discovered: In addition to finding the usual racist rants and interactions with other white power groups, we also found a disturbingly high amount of members who are also involved in campaigning for Ron Paul. According to these messages, Ron Paul has regularly met with many A3P members, even engaging in conference calls with their board of directors. We put extra effort in ruining the life of A3P webmaster Jamie Kelso. On top of being on the board of directors of A3P, former scientologist, and high ranking Ron Paul organizer, he also is the account owner of German Nazi forums and store nslforum.org, rhs-versand.com. We went ahead and wiped those websites off the internet as well, dumping private messages and order information. Paul met with Bill Johnson, the chairman of A3P. Johnson wrote a 1989 book, under the name James O. Pace, called "Amendment to the Constitution," backing what became known as the Pace Amendment. Here it is, in part: No person shall be a citizen of the United States unless he is a non-Hispanic white of the European race, in whom there is no ascertainable trace of Negro blood, nor more than one-eighth Mongolian, Asian, Asia Minor, Middle Eastern, Semitic, Near Eastern, American Indian, Malay or other non-European or non-white blood. Hispanic whites, defined as anyone with an Hispanic ancestor, may be citizens if, in addition to meeting the 98
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI aforesaid ascertainable trace and percentage tests, they are in appearance indistinguishable from Americans whose ancestral home is the British Isles or Northwestern Europe. Only citizens shall have the right and privilege to reside permanently in the United States. Ron Paul endorsed Bill Johnson for a seat on the Los Angeles Superior Court in 2008. Paul would retract his endorsement after Johnson’s racist views were made public. In e-mails Jamie Kelso boasted of being asked to be Johnson’s “personal assistant” and referred to Johnson as “Ron Paul’s top man in Southern California for the last 3 years.” Bill Johnson and I will be meeting with Ron Paul. I have a teleconference call with Bill (and Ron Paul) tonight. Much more later. Things are starting to happen (thanks to folks like you). I’ll be at CPAC from Feb. 9 to Feb. 12. I’ll send back reports to you from personal meetings with Ron Paul and many others. It’ll be here on WhiteNewsNow, a place that is really starting to get interesting because of the presence of folks like you. Birds of a feather flock together, and we are really gathering some quality here. The militia types also support Paul: Three months before farright terrorists killed 168 Americans in Oklahoma City; Paul’s newsletter praised the “1,500 local militias now training to defend liberty” as “one of the most encouraging developments in America.” And he offered specific advice to antigovernment militia members, such as, “Keep the group size down,” “Keep quiet and you’re harder to find,” “Leave no clues,” “Avoid the phone as much as possible,” and “Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.” Timothy McVeigh, using the alias "T. Tuttle," advertised for sale a military style launcher in the crypto-Nazi newspaper The Spotlight that repeatedly featured Paul. The ad, which appeared in the August 16, 1993 issue and two subsequent 99
A. J. WEBERMAN issues, offered for sale a "LAW launcher replica" which "fires 37 mm flares," as well as the flares themselves which can be modified for explosive use. (LAW stands for "light anti-tank weapon.") Paul, a Nazi who is planning hate crimes beyond most people’s comprehension, opposed Hate Crimes legislation: Last week, the House of Representatives acted with disdain for the Constitution and individual liberty by passing HR 1592, a bill creating new federal programs to combat so-called “hate crimes.” The legislation defines a hate crime as an act of violence committed against an individual because of the victim's race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. Federal hate crime laws violate the Tenth Amendment's limitations on federal power. Hate crime laws may also violate the First Amendment guaranteed freedom of speech and religion criminalizing speech federal bureaucrats define as “hateful.” There is no evidence that local governments are failing to apprehend and prosecute criminals motivated by prejudice, in comparison to the apprehension and conviction rates of other crimes. Therefore, new hate crime laws will not significantly reduce crime. Instead of increasing the effectiveness of law enforcement, hate crime laws undermine equal justice under the law by requiring law enforcement and judicial system officers to give priority to investigating and prosecuting hate crimes. Of course, all decent people should condemn criminal acts motivated by prejudice. But why should an assault victim be treated by the legal system as a second-class citizen because his assailant was motivated by greed instead of hate?
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI HR 1592, like all hate crime laws, imposes a longer sentence on a criminal motivated by hate than on someone who commits the same crime with a different motivation. Increasing sentences because of motivation goes beyond criminalizing acts; it makes it a crime to think certain thoughts. Criminalizing even the vilest hateful thoughts — as opposed to willful criminal acts — is inconsistent with a free society. HR 1592 could lead to federal censorship of religious or political speech on the grounds that the speech incites hate. Hate crime laws have been used to silence free speech and even the free exercise of religion. For example, a Pennsylvania hate crime law has been used to prosecute peaceful religious demonstrators on the grounds that their public Bible readings could incite violence. One of HR 1592's supporters admitted that this legislation could allow the government to silence a preacher if one of the preacher's parishioners commits a hate crime. More evidence that hate crime laws lead to censorship came recently when one member of Congress suggested that the Federal Communications Commission ban hate speech from the air waves. Hate crime laws not only violate the First Amendment, they also violate the Tenth Amendment. Under the United States Constitution, there are only three federal crimes: piracy, treason, and counterfeiting. All other criminal matters are left to the individual states. Any federal legislation dealing with criminal matters not related to these three issues usurps state authority over criminal law and takes a step toward turning the states into mere administrative units of the federal government.60 60
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1093&Itemid=69
A. J. WEBERMAN On September 7, 2000 Paul opposed the creation of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum while at the same time pretending to denounce Hitler: Mr. Chairman, I rise today in hesitant opposition to H.R. 4115, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Authorization Act. We as vigilant Americans must never forget the horrific lessons of the past and those attendant consequences of corporatism, fascism, and tyrannical government; that is, governmental deprivation of individual rights. A government which operates beyond its proper limits of preserving liberty never bodes well for individual rights to life, liberty and property. Particularly, Adolph Hitler’s tyrannical regime is most indicative of the necessary consequences of a government dominated by socalled ‘government-business’ partnerships, gunconfiscation schemes, protectionism, abandonment of speech and religious freedom in the name of ‘compelling government interests.’61 Hitler was a socialistic gun-confiscating liberal willing to abandon freedom of speech and religion in the name of ‘compelling government interests” another word for national security. The Nazis never nationalized the German means of production and companies like Mercedes Benz and General Aniline thrived under Hitler. Hitler had the socialist wing of the Nazi Party exterminated during the Night of the Long Knives. Paul continued to characterize Hitler as a socialist rather than a National Socialist: 61
. Congressional Record, V. 146, Pt. 12, July 27, 2000 to September 13, 2000 page 17229
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI The 20th century has produced socialist dictators the world over, from Stalin, Hitler, and Mao to Pol Pot, Castro, and Ho Chi Minh. More than 200 million people died as a result of bad ideas of these evil men. Each and every one of these dictators despised the principle of private property ownership, which then undermined all the other liberties cherished by the people. Paul had this to say about the resurgence of Nazism in Europe: This legislation refers to the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe as if it’s a purely homegrown phenomenon, as if native residents of European countries are suddenly committing violent crimes against Jews. But I think we are only getting part of the story here. What is absent from the legislation is mention of the well reported fact that much of the anti-Jewish violence in Europe is perpetrated by recent immigrants from Muslim countries of the Middle East and Africa. Reporting on a firebombing of a Synagogue in Marseille, France, for example, the New York Times quotes the longtime president of that region’s Jewish Council, Charles Haddad, as saying, “This is not anti-Semitic violence; it’s the Middle East conflict that’s playing out here.” The national police state mentality has essentially taken over crime investigation throughout the country. Our local sheriffs are intimidated and frequently overruled by the national police. Anything worse than writing traffic tickets prompts swarms of Federal agents to the scene. We frequently see the FBI, the DEA, the CIA, the BATF, Fish and Wildlife, the IRS, Federal marshals and even the Army involved in local law enforcement. They do not come to assist, but to take over. The two most notorious 103
A. J. WEBERMAN examples of federal abuse of police powers were seen at Ruby Ridge and Waco, where nonaggressive citizens were needlessly provoked and killed by government agents. At Waco, even Army tanks were used to deal with a situation that the local sheriff could have easily handled. These two incidents are well-known, but thousands of other similar abuses routinely occur with little publicity. The Federal police state seen in the action the Ruby Ridge and Waco hopefully is not a sign of things to come, but it could be, if we are not careful. In a speech reprinted in the Spotlight Paul remarked: â€œThis fear has come from the police state mentality that prompted Ruby Ridge, Waco and many other episodes of an errant federal government.â€? In 1992, in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, white separatist Randy Weaver, with his wife, four children, and a family friend, resisted well over one hundred law enforcement authorities after federal marshals attempted to arrest him for failing to make a court date stemming from illegal gun sales. Protestors for the Weavers included Aryan Nation members, skinheads, and Order members' families. Spotlight ran numerous articles about the incident. After an elevenday standoff a federal marshal, Weaver's wife Vicki and his son Sam were dead and a federal marshal, Weaver, and Weaver's friend shot. Rep. Helen Chenoweth (R-Idaho) introduced legislation in the House requiring federal authorities to secure state and local permission to conduct law enforcement operations in municipalities. Paul co-sponsored the bill. Every American racist is behind Ron Paul. He is their candidate! They know where he is coming from and there are plenty of them as historically there was never a shortage of bigots in America. MUSLIMS FOR PAUL
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
A smaller group of Paul supporters consist of Muslims. There several Facebook pages entitled Muslims for Ron Paul. A scan of Paul's political donors shows many common Muslim names, like Mohammed, Ali and Ahmed.62 Yousef al-Khattab, co-founder of the Islamist63 website and group Revolution Muslim,64 endorsed Ron Paul.65 The Website muslims4liberty, a pro-Paul site, contained this: It looks like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) needs a serious reality check. Last week the SPLC added long time friend of Muslims 4 Liberty, Michael Boldin to their list of “30 New Activists Heading Up the Radical Right.”66 Michael is the Founder and Director of the Tenth Amendment Center67 (TAC) and Muslims 4 Liberty stands with him TAC against this despicable slander. The TAC believes citizens and states have the right to nullify federal law so it has gained wide support among neo-Confederates who are still angry at the powers the federal government accumulated after the Civil War that allowed it, among other things, to act against segregation, discrimination. In the 1950s, several states tried unsuccessfully to resist desegregation by nullifying federal laws. The Supreme Court has consistently rejected nullification as unconstitutional.68
. http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/can_ind/P80000748/10/M/ . http://www.examiner.com/topic/islamist 64 . http://www.examiner.com/topic/revolution-muslim/articles 65 . http://www.examiner.com/article/co-founder-of-islamist-groupand-former-bin-laden-supporter-endorses-ron-paul 66 . http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browseall-issues/2012/summer/30-to-watch 67 . http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/ 105 63
A. J. WEBERMAN LOUIS FARRAKHAN of the Nation of Islam also supports Ron Paul: Brother Farrakhan is not anti-Semitic. But I have to say these people [those who established the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913] claim to be Jews. And no the Federal Reserve Bank really donâ€™t have nobody overseeing them. Congressman Ron Paul is trying his best but he is like a man crying in the wilderness to try and scrape the Federal Reserve and bring the right to print money back to the U.S. Congress.69 Farrakhan went on the say that it was no coincidence that the Anti-Defamation League was formed in 1913 as its purpose was to stop anyone from criticizing the Federal Reserve Bank. Out of six bankers present at the formulation of the Fed, one, Paul Warburg of Kuhn & Loeb was Jewish.70 Another large group of rank and file Ron Paul supporters are young Whites. In the results of a Gallup71 poll broken down by age of respondents, Ron Paul does disproportionately well with voters aged 18-34, being the preferred choice of 20% of that demographic nationally. Some of these kids have no idea what Paul represents and have no idea of his hidden agenda. They are dupes. They are generally the young Paulbots who donâ€™t realize Paul is a Nazi and instead believe he is a Libertarian who wants to free the Prisoners of Weed (POW) and legalize marijuana. Paul plays them like a violin. I assume they believe he is as far from Nazi totalitarianism as you can get because
files/profiles/michael-boldin 69 8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmt51yrwmQ&feature=player_embedded 70 9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act 71
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI he attacks the power of the State, however, he does this for several covert reasons. The main reason is that it is part of his crypto-Nazi politics. Paul is a neo-confederate and if this were American Civil War times he would be labeled a traitor to the Union. Paul says that he wants to weaken the Federal Government and wants certain powers returned to State Governments just as the Confederates did. This way the Southern states could re-institute the right to segregate and discriminate. “States’ Rights” as in J. B. Stoner’s National States Rights Party is a dog whistle term for the imposition of Jim Crow. These younger Paulbots are programmed with the same buzz words such as “constitution” and “freedom” as they troll the internet looking for negative comments about Paul. Freedom and Bread," was the slogan used by Hitler to great effect during the Nazi electoral campaign against tired old President Hindenburg.
THE SILENT MAJORITY But not all of Paul’s youthful followers are Nazi dupes. Judging from World War II and how America refused to bomb the Nazi death camps, there will always be a residual undercurrent of Jew hatred in America for demagogues like Paul to tap into for support. That is why, although they have had no Nazi affiliation in the past, many Ron Paul supporters have held racist and Jew-hating sympathies that they were forced to suppress otherwise they would have risked social ostracism in a politically correct world. This group caught on to the fact that Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and jumped at the chance to finally express their hatred for Blacks and Jews in a socially acceptable way and politically correct way. LEFTISTS FOR RON PAUL Jew-hating “Progressives” are also supporting Ron Paul. At Truthdig, Robert Scheer calls him “a profound and principled contributor to a much-needed national debate on the limits of 107
A. J. WEBERMAN federal power.” When former White House correspondent Helen Thomas said that Jews should leave Palestine and go back to Poland and Germany Scheer defended her. Salon’s Glenn Greenwald (photo left) is so outraged that progressives haven’t abandoned Obama for Paul that he accuses them of supporting the murder of Muslim children. Greenwald had to stop practicing law after it was revealed that he had smuggled out messages from prison on behalf of Nazi Matt Hale. There’s a Paul fan base in the Occupy movement and at Counterpunch, where Alexander Cockburn is a longtime admirer. Cockburn was fired from the Village Voice for taking money from anti-Israeli Arab organizations. Paul is a regular guest of Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz (Jon Stewart), who has yet to ask him a tough question. Stewart minimizes the threat posed by radical Islam and has often been labeled a traitor to the Jews. The leftist Code Pink endorsed him. Jewish celebrities like Oliver Stone, Howard Stern and Bill Maher also support Paul for reasons that are beyond my understanding, although Oliver Stone showed that despite the indisputable fact that Adolf Hitler would have sent him to a gas chamber Stone had sympathy for him: “Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it’s been used cheaply.” Stone, who met with the Iranian Hitler Ahmadinejad, went on to say that the Jewish Lobby is preventing an open discussion about the truth of the Holocaust. Stone’s son recently traveled to Iran and converted to Shiite Islam. In the early 1980’s Stone was going to base his move JFK on a book I co-authored Coup D’Etat in America – The CIA and the Assassination of John Kennedy however Colonel Fletcher Prouty talked him out of it. Prouty was on the Board of Directors of Spotlight. The Jew haters on the Left know that Paul is a dedicated, incorruptible enemy of the State of Israel as any Nazi would be. That is why they rally behind him. SELF-HATING JEWS FOR PAUL 108
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Jews on the far Right also support Paul. In his book, Liberty Defined Paul expressed his pleasure that an anti-Zionist self-hating group called the American Council for Judaism allegedly has growing support. Other American Jews have spoken out against Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians as well. The American Council for Judaism is growing in influence in the American Jewish community, especially with the younger generation. Although it’s argued that Jews are motivated to immigrate to Israel because they were exiled from Palestine, only a small fraction of American Jews ever moved to Israel. The American Council for Judaism is opposed the concept of Jewish nationality and a Jewish state. The editor of its publications, Allan C. Brownfield, told the New York Times that “While we wish Israel well, we don’t view it as our homeland.” In the fall of 2010, Brownfield wrote a glowing book review of The Dark Side of Zionism, a book that equates Zionism with Nazism. 72 Brownfield’s article Zionism and Anti-Semitism - A Strange Alliance Through History was reprinted by the Nazi Institute for Historical Review.73 Allan C. Brownfeld received his B.A. degree from the College of William and Mary, his J.D. degree from the MarshallWythe School of Law of the College of William and Mary and his M.A. in Government and Politics from the University of Maryland. He has served on the faculties of St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Alexandria, Virginia, and the University College of the University of Maryland. He is not much of a Jew; in fact it appears as if he has converted to Catholicism somewhere along the line. 72
A. J. WEBERMAN Brownfeld is a columnist for the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation,74 a bunch of Jew hating anti-abortion Catholics that include the Holocaust denier and Spotlight golden boy Patrick Buchanan. The Foundation recently honored Joe Sobran, a Jew hating piece of trash who was fired by William F. Buckley from the National Review for his anti-Semitic columns. In 1985 a six-member federal jury found that Spotlight libeled National Review in the early 1970's by printing that National Review's editor, William F. Buckley Jr., had a ''close working relationship'' with George Lincoln Rockwell, founder of the American Nazi Party. This was a clever ploy and a big lie used to discredit Buckley. The Naziâ€™s considered Buckley a kosher conservative and a threat to the racist right. The founder of the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation, Fran Griffin, and a big pro-lifer, supports Ron Paul despite Paulâ€™s having said that abortion laws should be left up to the States, rather than abortion being outlawed on a federal level as murder. If this were to be the case women in states where it was illegal could always travel to states where it was not to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. The American Council for Judaism was founded by Lessing J. Rosenwald. Rosenwald was a pathological piece of work who wanted to see his own people destroyed, thinking the Nazis would overlook him or maybe he believed that the Nazis were right and he also should be destroyed? Born in Chicago, Rosenwald was the son of Julius Rosenwald, a clothier who became part-owner and was president of Sears, Roebuck and Company from 1908 to 1923, and chairman from 1923 to 1932. Lessing went to work for Sears in 1911 as a shipping clerk, and in 1920, was given the important responsibility of opening a catalog supply center for the growing mail-order. Succeeding his father, he was Chairman of Sears from 1932 until 1939. Rosenwald was the best known Jewish supporter of the America First Committee that was led by his successor at Sears-Roebuck and lifelong 74
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI friend Robert E. Wood. He finally resigned from the Committee's board in December 1940 over concerns about anti-Semitism, but stated that he remained "fully in accord with the Committee's objectives." In 1943, Rosenwald accepted the invitation to become President of the American Council for Judaism, a position he held until 1955; after that he remained Chairman of the Board.75 Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal was another prominent member of the American Council for Judaism. Lilienthal was the first Jew to denounce Israel in Readers Digest article entitled “Israel’s Flag is Not Mine.” The Nazi Duke praised Lilienthal for having dared to expose the truth about Jewish supremacism. Lilienthal signed a petition that supported French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson's right to publish his filthy lies in France. Lilienthal was published by Regnery Press. Henry Regnery's grandfather, William H. Regnery, was the founder of the America First Committee. Lilienthal, the dirty low life piece of scum wrote this about, Anne Frank, an innocent Jewish girl killed by the Nazi pigs: The Diary of Anne Frank may be a fraud. It was sold as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it could not possibly have been the work of a teenager.76 Paul favors self-hating Jews because they are easier to deceive and to ultimately murder than the militant variety. Ron Paul shook a hand that shook Achmadinajad’s hand. The hand belonged to Yisroel Dovid 75
A. J. WEBERMAN Weiss, a traitorous “rabbi” who leads Neturei Karta, a sect of ultraOrthodox Jews who want to see Israel destroyed to hasten the coming of the Messiah. While many Haredim (ultra-orthodox) believe the Jews get the Holy Land when the Messiah arrives, not before -- only Neturei Karta actively sides with Israel's enemies. The late Neturei Karta leader Moshe Hirsh was a close associate of Yasser Arafat, and Rabbi Weiss has traveled with a delegation to Tehran more than once, including on a trip to attend an infamous conference on so-called Holocaust revisionism. Weiss told Paul that Judaism was a religion and "should never be transformed into nationalism." Paul responded by saying that the suggestion was "good advice". Ron Paul’s Jewish senior legal advisor, Bruce Fein, believes that Paul won’t wait until America is attacked but would take preemptive action if the CIA called for it: Ron Paul would close the hundreds of U.S. military bases abroad, redeploy weapons and soldiers now dedicated to defending foreigners and foreign countries to the U.S. to defend American sovereignty and Americans, and end our multiple treaty obligations that require us to wage war in defense of other nations. Our government shouldn’t send Americans abroad on quests to secure the liberty of foreigners. Candidate Paul favors the collection of intelligence on potential adversaries, trade between the United States and other nations, and cultural exchanges and embassies abroad. Like President Thomas Jefferson, he would seek “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.” The cornerstone of peace and the common defense is deterrence. Ron Paul would embrace a retaliatory capability sufficient to destroy every living thing in 112
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI any country complicit in an actual or imminent attack on the United States. He would deploy troops and weapons systems capable of foiling any acts of war targeting Americans on American soil.77 Ron Paul, however, said he would never launch a pre-emptive attack: Why are we in Korea? We’ve been there since I’ve been in high school. Why are we in Japan? We’ve been there since World War II. Why are we in Germany, subsidizing their welfare state by paying for their defense by staying in Germany? And why are we in five wars in the Middle East? We’d be much better off. We are less safe because of this. We’re going broke. And it undermines our national security. So why stay any of those places? There’s no economic or military advantage for us to be so involved, trying to make other people live the way we do. If we have— Fox News: Well, yeah, but some would say, Congressman, that there’s a difference in being defensive or being offensive, when it comes to protecting our country. Some believe that we can more defensive, and when there’s a threat we can defend against it. Others believe that we should be offensive, which is part of the reason why there are some military bases overseas, so that we’re “leading” in those areas. Ron Paul: Right! Fox News: Why do you believe that that’s not the way to go?
A. J. WEBERMAN Ron Paul: Because that’s the way dictators work. To say it casually that we should consider being offensive, that’s what dictators do. This whole idea that was encapsulated with the last administration that “we endorse preventive war, pre-emptive war; we go to war to prevent somebody from attacking us,” that is endless war—and for casual reasons, without declaration. I think that is so dangerous. We should have a defense; we should defend our country. But when you talk about bases because we might need an offensive war, I consider that absolutely un-American.78 Fein was raised in an Orthodox Jewish home and in 1972 graduated from Harvard Law School with honors. Fein served as an associate deputy attorney and general counsel to the Federal Communications Commission under Ronald Reagan. He served as Research Director for Republicans on the Joint Congressional Committee on Covert Arms Sales to Iran. He has been a Visiting Fellow for Constitutional Studies at the Heritage Foundation and an adjunct scholar at American Enterprise Institute. He has advised numerous countries on constitutional reform, including South Africa, Hungary and Russia. Sounds like a rational individual until we discover that he drew up baseless articles of impeachment for President Obama. But now the plot thickens. Fein’s wife, Mattie, an Iranian Jew, took an interventionist proIsrael position when she ran for Congress in Venice, California. Mattie Fein was asked “Would you support Israel taking military action to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? Under what circumstances?” and she responded “The United States should 78
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI support whatever Israel believes is justified by national security worries over Iran.â€? As a result many of the Jew-hating Paulbots are calling for the removal of Fein as they have labeled this Jewish Uncle Tom, this token Jew, this schick dreck, as a Zionist infiltrator. Ron Paul stated he would not have helped Jews escape the Holocaust. Fein wrote: That Kissinger is devoid of moral scruple or noble character is confirmed by a recently released Oval Office tape recording his volunteered advice to then President Richard M. Nixon regarding the free emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel to escape persecution: "And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."79 Ron Paul is against criminalizing hate speech but Fein is not: The ugliest marks in the history of the United States have stemmed from the incitements to racial prejudice practiced by Theodore Bilbo, Orville Faubus, the Ku Klux Klan, and the producers of The Birth of a Nation. Diatribes of these types create an explosive social nitroglycerine waiting for an epithet or racial incident to spark violence. ...It is said that if racially or religiously bigoted speech is squelched, there will be no stopping point to prevention of genuine free speech. Nonsense! The progress of civilization has been the progress of making refinements and differentiations in the law. Prohibitions on racially or religiously derogatory speech have existed in the United States, Canada, Great Britain, West Germany, and elsewhere without undermining democracy, political dissent or debate. ...Prohibiting racially and religiously bigoted 79
A. J. WEBERMAN speech is praiseworthy because it seeks to elevate, not to degrade, because it draws from human experience, not from woolly dogmas or academic slogans, because it salutes reason as the backbone of freedom and tolerance. Is that clear enough?80 When Fein parrots Paul’s line about cutting off foreign aid he never mentions the word “Israel” but lists other countries like the Sudan. He is afraid his family might disown him. There are so many contradictions about Fein that I have to question whether is a publicity seeker who would sell out his own people to get on cable or something more sinister. Anyway you want to look at it he is serving the Nazis. LYNDON LAROUCHE SUPPORTS RON PAUL
Numerous Ron Paul web pages carry stories that alleged that Ron Paul is the victim of massive vote fraud. Researcher Dennis King reported that when crypto-Nazi Lyndon LaRouche candidates made a poor showing, The national office strives to maintain their morale by telling them it's a result of "vote fraud." The USLP (LaRouches political party) has become, in fact, quite expert on the vote fraud issue. In 1976 it persuaded 80
. http://books.google.com/books? id=iluL7WFV9lYC&pg=PA134&lpg=PA134&dq="from+woolly+dogmas+or+ academic+slogans"&source=bl&ots=RKFiVZEJ4V&sig=PVIVa8PXBdXHuP pkoaCo6slcqEA&hl
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI local Republicans in four states, and also a top Ford advisor, to cooperate in court challenges against Carter's victory. According to defectors, the USLP vote fraud experts have also been hired on occasion as consultants to mainstream politicians.81 This claim of vote fraud is not the only connection between Ron Paul and Lyndon LaRouche and his zombie-like followers. In the mid-1970s LaRouche and his group were close with Ron Paul associate Willis Carto, according to LaRouche's deposition in a libel case and one by Carto in another lawsuit. Carto said in his 1980 deposition that his group, Liberty Lobby, never endorsed the LaRouche’s group but that he was "quite impressed" with its members and that his organization's newspaper, Spotlight, had praised it. LaRouche met with Carto in Wiesbaden, Germany. Questioned about this meeting during a 1984 deposition, LaRouche recalled that they had discussed "the Jewish question" as well as the "abomination" of America's postwar occupation of Germany. LaRouche knows Paul is a crypto-Nazi like him and sings his praises: Going into the final Republican Presidential debate of the pre-primary series, Rep. Ron Paul's support is surging, based on the response to his principled stands against Obama's wars, and against Obama's violent attacks on U.S. constitutional principles and civil rights. Paul has reportedly worked with attorney Bruce Fein, who has circulated a bill of impeachment against Obama. Lyndon LaRouche commented that should Paul win in Iowa and/or New Hampshire, it will "trigger a crisis" for the British-directed perpetual war party.82 According to Dennis King “British” is LaRouche’s dog whistle term for Jew. LaRouche stated: 81
A. J. WEBERMAN In addition to Ron Paul's statement's that an "impeachment process would be possible" against Obama in the killing of American citizens Anwar alAwlaki and Samir Kahn, are condemnations from other leading figures. Already on Sept. 30, Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) made a statement condemning the administration for what it called "the extrajudicial killing" of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen. In the larger context, the fact that Obama has boasted that he is responsible for the assassinations of two American citizens, with no due process and a "state secret" blanket claim, is the strongest corroboration to date of Lyndon LaRouche's April 11, 2009 diagnosis of Obama as an extreme narcissist in the tradition of Emperor Nero and Hitler in the bunker. On Friday, Obama proved that LaRouche was absolutely correct. As of Friday, Obama is a lot closer to being removed from office by impeachment or the invoking of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment than most people realize.83 LaRouche agrees with Ron Paul when it comes to the Fed: â€œThe Fed prefers to please the British, rather than defend the interests of the United States. These people have betrayed the country," LaRouche concluded. "They should get the credit for betraying the country." He agrees with Paul on 9/11 revisionism and with Willis Carto on Holocaust denial: In a Carto-influenced article LaRouche later tried to suppress, LaRouche stated: America must be cleansed for its righteous war by the immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobby and other British agents from the councils of government, industry, and labor. Zionist cultism is among the most worthless, most contemptible of causes.84 83
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI What LaRouche is saying here is that America must make amends for its role in World War II by purging the various professions of Jews, just as Hitler did in Nazi Germany. We shall now examine the cult character of Zionism at successive levels, beginning with the commonplace delusions of the American Zionist or Zionist fellow traveler. The contemptible but impassioned sophistry that the Zionist demagogue offers to all foolish enough to be impressed with such hoaxes is the ‘holocaust’ thesis. It is argued that the culmination of the persecution of the Jews in the Nazi holocaust proves that Zionism is so essential to ‘Jewish survival’ that any anti-Zionist is therefore not only an anti-Semite, but that any sort of criminal action is excusable against anti-Zionists in memory of the mythical ‘six million Jewish victims’ of the Nazi ‘holocaust.’ This is worse than sophistry. It is a lie. True about a million and a half Jews did die as a result of the Nazi policy of labor-intensive ‘appropriate technology’ for the employment of ‘inferior races,’ a small fraction of the tens of millions of others - especially Slavs - who were murdered in the same way Jewish refugee Felix Rohatyn proposes today. So there weren’t any gas chambers – Jews were worked to death at menial jobs and was only a small fraction of the others who were murdered. Then LaRouche brings in Felix Rohatyn to illustrate that today the Jews are worse murderers than the Nazis were. Even on a relative scale, what the Nazis did to Jewish victims was mild compared with the virtual extermination of gypsies and the butchery of Communists. The point is that Adolf Hitler was put 84
A. J. WEBERMAN into power largely on the initiative of the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Oppenheimers, among others. According to LaRouche the Jews brought on their own destruction by financing Hitler. The murderers of the million and a half or more Jews who died in the ‘holocaust’ are any group, Jewish or non-Jewish, which supported then or now the policies advocated by Felix Rohatyn or Milton Friedman. Either you, as a Jew, join with the U.S. Labor Party to stop Rohatyn and Friedman or you are implicitly just as guilty of the death of millions of Jews as Adolf Hitler. Here LaRouche says “a million and a half or more” Jews were killed in the so-called Holocaust rather than “a million and a half” and again attributes their death to the Jewish economists Rohatyn and Friedman then he tells us you have to join him in his effort to “stop” (kill) these Jews or you will be labeled “a Nazi” (confusing code word for a Jew) and you will die like the rest of the Jews when the big day comes and LaRouche takes power. All these code words and bizarre theories caused LaRouche to be less of a threat than Paul, although long as he is alive LaRouche will remain a threat. In 1976, LaRouche campaigned for the first time in a presidential election as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043 votes (0.05 percent). He received 25,562 votes in the 1988 presidential election, standing under the banner of the "National Economic Recovery" party. In the 1988 Presidential Election Paul placed third in the popular vote with 431,750 votes (0.47%), behind Republican Bush and Democrat Michael Dukakis. THE RON PAUL FAREWELL SPEECH IN TAMPA
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
In July 2012 Ron Paul spoke at a rally on Sunday, August 26, 2012 at the University of South Florida’s Sundome. This event was going to be the biggest Nazi rally since the German-American Bund at Madison Square Garden in New York City, on February 20, 1939 pictured on the left, however on twenty-thousand people attended. The speakers included Doug Weade, Paul’s campaign manager (the closest Paul will ever come to weed) and Ron Paul’s former chief of staff Lew Rockwell. Rockwell reprinted hundreds of Patrick Buchanan’s articles on his blog. Rockwell is the reincarnation of neo-Nazi leader George Lincoln Rockwell. He wrote, What happened was that when the Nazis first learned of the fire, they assumed that it was carried out by the Communists and, therefore, that it would be a great piece of political propaganda to use to go after the Communists. When they later learned that it was a lone arsonist, they decided to ignore the truth and still claim the Communists were behind the fire. And that is the lie about the Reichstag Fire—not that it was a False Flag operation carried out by the Nazis.85 Rockwell has a history of defending Nazis and wrote, “When Nazi Germany occupied France during WW2, did the evil Germans forbid the French from going to church?” 86 In a 1990 column 85
A. J. WEBERMAN defending Nazi War Criminal John Demjanjuk Buchanan denied that Jews had been mass murdered using diesel engine fumes: Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide to kill anybody. In 1988, 97 kids trapped 400 feet underground in Washington, D.C. tunnel while two locomotive spewed diesel exhausts into the car, emerged unharmed after 45 minutes. Demjanjuk’s weapon of mass murder cannot kill. The Paulfest featured at least one Jew so it would not seem like an anti-Jewish, anti-Israel event. Professor Walter Edward Block (see illustration for his book Thinking the Unthinkable on the left) spoke. Block lectured about the rights of a woman to stop an unwanted pregnancy. He explained that the libertarian theory of abortion leads to the right of the woman to evict an unwanted fetus, but not to kill that fetus, a theory he refers to as "evictionism." Block stated that in the event of an unwanted pregnancy, a fetus becomes to its mother what a trespasser is to the owner of the property in question. The problem here is that the “trespasser” is afforded no rights, no liberty, from this so-called libertarian. If the pregnancy is terminated in the six month of gestation he would remove it and let it die a horrible death rather than perform a Dilation and Curettage. This crackpot is one of the leading Jewish defenders of voluntary slave contracts87 arguing that a slave contract is "a bona fide contract where consideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated, theft occurs." He argues that his position shows "that contract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthest realms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts.”88 87
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Aside from the re-legalization of slavery, the Pauloids will be rallying for more strip mining as Block has written, To say of a thing that it is “natural” or “unnatural” is not to say anything about that thing’s intrinsic value. A thing’s value depends upon whether or not it satisfies our needs, and contributes to our well-being. Strip mining, when evaluated rationally, fulfills these more rational criteria. Block made some stupid Jewish joke that stereotyped Jews. firstname.lastname@example.org Of course the main speaker was Ron Paul. The former Liberty Lobbyist repeatedly used the word “Liberty” in an ambiguous fashion as in “the cause of liberty.” What he precisely meant by the word was never defined but his audience comprised of 99% Whites knew what he meant, Paul was unhappy with the RNC because many of his delegates had been disqualified because of a rule change and because he was not going to be given a speaking slot at the convention. He never mentioned Israel by name however it was referred to by implication when he used the term “my foreign policy.” He recalled that other “mainstream republicans” had told him: We like you but if you would change your foreign policy you would have a lot more success. You need to change your foreign policy. And of course if I didn’t have the policy that I do have I don’t believe we would be here tonight. This is something they obviously do not understand; those who do understand it fear it because of the powerful special interests behind a foreign policy of intervention in the military industrial complex but its complex but they strongly resent this. The term “military industrial complex” was invented by the Leftist sociologist C. Wright Mills and first used in his book The Power Elite (1956) then picked up by President Eisenhower in his farewell address (1960) in which he stated that it was a threat to democracy. So the dirty Jews are the “powerful special interests” 123
A. J. WEBERMAN who pull the strings behind the scenes and control the armaments industry so they can profiteer from the wars they instigate. Later on Paul would state, “The media is part of the military industrial complex.” In other words the Jews control the media. Another code word for Jew is “neo-con” because many of the neo-cons were Jewish. “Right now we still have neo-cons all over the place they are not just in one party either.” Paul traced America’s troubles to 1913 but refused to admit that a Republican was President at the time. Paul continues his historical narrative but is hesitant to use the word “Nazi.” He skipped over a few decades then stated that it was in the “1930’s where we had so much Fascism and Keynesianism.” Earlier he had said that in the 1930’s “the fascism of Hitler and Mussolini, and they contributed to another 25 million people that died” then made reference to the “fascism of Europe” and how we “ended up” in World War II. Paul is not going to blame the Nazis because he is a crypto-Nazi. Paul knows by this time he will get nowhere with the American people unless there is a catastrophic economic event that can be blamed on Israel: “The downfall of the economy will provide more excuses to crack the whip and crackdown on our civil liberties.” He makes it seem as if the present administration would be responsible when it would more likely be crypto-Nazis like himself. Terrorism is a result of “blowback” and the chances of anyone being killed by a terrorist are one in 25 million. He claimed that American soldier had up to a 20% chance that he would be killed by friendly fire. Paul said he heard someone remark that if Paul’s people were in charge Osama Bin Laden would still be alive. Paul countered “but you know that I think the answer is so would the 3,000 people still be alive.” So America was to blame for 9/11 not Islam. Prior to this Paul hinted 9/11 was an inside job. Paul said he had also be accused of not being patriotic – he cited pre-op traitor not only to his country but to his sex, Bradley Manning and Wiki U.S. security document publisher Julian Assange as patriots. Ron Paul ended his farewell address with this thought: 124
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In 1935 Sinclair Lewis wrote a novel It Canâ€™t Happen Here and that novel essentially was a warning because he believed that it could happen here; it was an anti-Fascist novel because he was very concerned about Mussolini and the Nazis and his whole argument was that it can happen here. But I would like to turn that around and say it can happen here. Paul qualified this statement saying something for the good can happen here but his more cognizant followers caught on to the real drift of his statement. Currently Ron Paul supporters are a minority. But remember, Hitlerâ€™s "National-Socialist Freedom Movement" polled 3% of the vote in the December 1924 Reichstag elections, and this fell to 2.6% in 1928. State elections produced similar results. But two years later, after the results were in for the September 1930 Reichstag elections, the Nazis won 18.3% of the vote, and became the second-largest party in the Reichstag. This was a result of the 1929 stock market crash and the subsequent Great Depression during which Germany became the hardest hit country with unemployment reaching 6.5 million. As long as Ron Paul runs for public office he is a threat. Hitler was elected to public office; there was no coup or power grab and Ron Paul is still a viable candidate waiting in the wings to take power when the economic and political circumstances are right. Paul's campaign chairman Jesse Benton stated that Paul was not considering running under a third-party candidacy barring "some sort of financially catastrophic event in this country." Paul was hoping that an American-Israeli attack on Iran launched before the 2012 elections will cause an economic crisis that will catapult him to power just as Hitler benefited from the 1929 Stock Market crash and the Great Depression that followed. 89 Paul is betting against America. Ron Paul is a defeatist and traitor to his country
A. J. WEBERMAN who wants to accomplish what Hitler failed to do â€“ defeat the United States. For every generation of Jews there is going to be some political figure out to mass murder the Jewish people and this time it is Ron Paul, in league with his proxy, Ahmadinejad, the Hitler of Iran.
CHAPTER FIVE USING IRAN AS A PROXY TO DESTROY ISRAEL
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
Paul knows that it would be impossible to goad America into attacking the Jewish state. He needs a proxy and he sees Iran as his best hope because the leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is a Holocaust denier and Holocaust deniers are Nazis like himself. As reported, Holocaust denial (Holocaust Revisionism is a euphemism) was an invention of Francis Parker Yockey, a Nazi spy. Yockey was linked to Ron Paul through Paul’s associate Spotlight publisher Willis Carto. Where are Holocaust deniers really coming from? Holocaust deniers are crypto-Nazis not revisionist historians. First of all they all know the Holocaust took place but deny it in order to further Nazism. Most people were disgusted by Nazism due to its insane genocidal nature so the Nazis want to convince people that this pathology did not exist so people will be attracted to Nazism once again. They are well aware that unlike themselves, not too many people are into gassing babies. Holocaust deniers also want to deny the last Holocaust so when they perpetrate a new one they can deny that one too. Another motivation of the Nazi Holocaust denier is to de-legitimatize the necessity for the existence of Israel, because the Holocaust was what convinced the world to give the Jews their own State. The Nazi despises Israel because the existence of Israel makes it much harder for the Nazi insect to kill Jews since, unlike the Jews in Nazi Germany Jews in Israel are not unarmed. Nazism is about - among other things - the killing of Jews; it is a criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder. Finally these vermin want to desecrate the memory of those who perished. They’ve taken everything from these Jews and now they want to take their deaths from them and make them into non-persons. The first part of Paul’s plan to destroy Israel then wipe out the Jewish race is to protect the political interests of Ahmadinejad, the Hitler of Iran, by ending sanctions against Iran (Paul was one of four 127
A. J. WEBERMAN Congressmen who voted against sanctions) so that the regime does not capitulate and give up its bomb making program. Paul wants to help the Iranians get atomic weapons and the means to deliver them to Tel Aviv any way he can. JUSTIN AMASH Rep. Justin Amash was one of the four. Justin Amash is the son of a Palestinian father, and Syrian mother. The father of this firstgeneration Arab-American is a Palestinian whose family was driven from its home by Israel during its war of liberation and lived in a refugee camp. Amash is chairman of the House Liberty Caucus. There’s no formal membership list, and Amash said about a dozen regular meetings are held in his office. He hopes the group gets big enough someday that they need to move to a bigger space. In his Position Paper on U.S. – Israel Relations he stated “The United States has a long and strategically important history of strong foreign relations with Israel. As a member of Congress, I will work to continue and strengthen this relationship. I will also respect Israel’s sovereignty and will not support counterproductive efforts to impose agreements or conditions on Israel. Israel must manage its foreign relations and domestic policies as it deems to be in its own best interests as a sovereign nation.” This has caused some other Arabs to label him pro-Israel, however, his affinity for Ron Paul indicates this is merely a ruse. Note the phrase “strategically important history of strong foreign relations” as to military relations. Then he goes on to state that America must minimize its foreign relations with Israel and let the Jewish State be on its own. Rand Paul also claims to be pro-Israel yet he is in favor of letting Iran develop the bomb. “Ron Paul was an educational figure. He was out there really presenting things that others had not been talking about,” he said. “This next generation of liberty Republicans, like Rand Paul and Mike Lee and Thomas Massie and Raul Labrador, we’re interested in making sure that … we re-brand the Republican Party as a place that is welcoming to people from across the political spectrum and 128
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI follows the founding principles of our country: limited government, economic freedom, individual liberty.” Amash voted against H.R. 3783 Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012 along with John Duncan, (R-TN), Walter Jones (R-NC) Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ron Paul (Nazi -TX). The second part of Paul’s plan involves weakening Israel by cutting off all economic and military aid so that it will be easier for Iran to destroy it. But he can’t say this; otherwise people would put this together with his Nazi Newsletter connections and realize what his hidden agenda is about. So he says cut off all foreign aid. All foreign aid should end, which is blatantly unconstitutional. Paul had to admit “While it may be a relatively small part of our federal budget, for many countries it is a large part of theirs and it creates perverse incentives for both our friends and enemies.” In February 2012 Paul asked for House vote on an amendment that would cut $6 billion of U.S. aid. Paul was trying to build support for an amendment to the fiscal 2011 funding bill that would end all foreign assistance to Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Pakistan. If Paul's amendment gets a vote, it would be the first time the entire House would vote on whether or not to give $6 billion to these foreign governments. The vote would come in the midst of the largest American fiscal crisis in a generation, which could increase the chance that it would attract significant support.90 Paul knows well that Israel is the number one recipient of military foreign aid. Egypt and Pakistan are next but unlike Israel they are not threatened with annihilation from numerous hostile nations. He fooled the New York Times which wrote, “His votes against support for Israel follow quite naturally from his opposition to all foreign aid. There is no sign that they reflect any special animus against the Jewish state.”91
A. J. WEBERMAN The third part of the plan involves bringing all the military back from abroad, not just from the Middle East. This would also make it more difficult to come to the aid of Israel (which would be highly unlikely under a Paul regime anyway) and more importantly it would remove a deterrent to war. But it has plausible deniability due to the word all. His blanket statements shield his real purposes. The Paulbots are fond of quoting Benjamin Netanyahu out of context to show that Paul is a friend of Israel and is doing Israel a favor by cutting off aid: My friends, you don't need to do nation building in Israel. We're already built. You don't need to export democracy to Israel. We've already got it. You don't need to send American troops to defend Israel. We defend ourselves. You've been very generous in giving us tools to do the job of defending Israel on our own. The rest of this quotation reads: Thank you all, and thank you President Obama, for your steadfast commitment to Israel's security. I know economic times are tough. I deeply appreciate this. Support for Israel's security is a wise investment in our common future. 92 In no way was Netanyahu saying that Israel no longer wants American economic and military aid. If this were the case Israel would refuse it. Ron Paul is Israel’s avowed enemy but he has to be low key about it so his soft line on Israel is basically “let’s take Jefferson’s advice and not get involved in foreign entanglements.” He wants 91
. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/magazine/22Paul-t.html? pagewanted=all 92 . http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/israeli-prime-ministerbinyamin-netanyahus-address-tocongress/2011/05/24/AFWY5bAH_story.html 130
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI America to stay neutral. This is reminiscent of The Neutrality Acts, laws that were passed by the United States Congress in the 1930s, in response to the growing turmoil in Europe and Asia that eventually led to World War II. They were spurred by the growth in isolationism and non-interventionism in the US following its costly involvement in World War I, and sought to ensure that the US would not become entangled again in foreign conflicts. The legacy of the Neutrality Acts in the 1930s was widely regarded as having been generally negative: they made no distinction between aggressor and victim, treating both equally as "belligerents"; and they limited the US government's ability to aid Britain against Nazi Germany. Ron Paul is also fond of saying that Israel can defend itself because it has 300 nukes. The Nazi Paul hopes to see the State of Israel reach a point where it would become so desperate thanks to a nuclear Iran it have to employ these atomic weapons and exercise what is known as the Samson Option. The Samson Option is a term that describes the Israeli deterrence strategy of massive retaliation with nuclear weapons as a “last resort” against nations whose military attacks threaten its very existence. The use of nuclear weapons by Israel almost became a reality when, on the afternoon of October 6, 1973, Egypt and Syria attacked Israel in a coordinated surprise attack, beginning the Yom Kippur War. Caught with only regular forces on duty, augmented by reservists with a low readiness level, Israeli front lines crumbled. By early afternoon on October 7, no effective forces were in the southern Golan Heights and Syrian forces had reached the edge of the plateau, overlooking the Jordan River. This crisis brought Israel to nuclear alert. Defense Minister Moshe Dayan told the Prime Minister Golda Meir that “this is the end of the third temple,” referring to an 131
A. J. WEBERMAN impending collapse of the state of Israel. “Temple” was also the code word for nuclear weapons. The Israelis assembled 13 twentykiloton atomic bombs. The Jericho missiles and the nuclear strike F4s were armed and prepared for action against Syrian and Egyptian targets. They also targeted Damascus with nuclear capable longrange artillery. U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was notified of the alert several hours later on the morning of October 9. The U.S. decided to open an aerial resupply pipeline to Israel, and Israeli aircraft began picking up supplies that day.93 There are other aspects of the Samson option that could destroy the world. Aside from destroying enemy troops and fortifications the enemy’s oil fields might be targeted. Exercising the Samson option would raise the price of gasoline to $50 a gallon. It would also raise radiation levels and cancer rates throughout the world and contaminate the food supply. The West has a strategic interest, like it or not, in making sure there is not going to be another Holocaust, this time a nuclear Holocaust, not only out of moral considerations but out of practical ones, because an atomic war in the Middle East could destroy Western Civilization. This is an entirely different ballgame than when the West stood by and let the Nazis slaughter at least 6 million defenseless Jews, something Jews will never let happen again. That is why Paul’s Iranian policy of using Iran as a proxy to destroy Israel is irrational because of the Israeli nuclear arsenal. The only way it makes sense is if the mass murder of Jews, despite the consequences, is your main goal. The United States has no choice. It must join Israel if Israel decides to destroy the Iranian bomb factories: If Israel strikes Iran’s bomb factories unilaterally it is unlikely it could cripple Iran’s retaliatory capacity. Iran looks at Israel as an American proxy and would retaliate against the United States even if the United States had no involvement in the strike. But if American and NATO joined in a strike against Iran, Iran could be brought to its knees and it would be much more difficult for it to retaliate. I must reiterate. If it means the destruction of Israel, Ron Paul doesn’t care what the 93
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI consequences are for America. Hatred for Jews is in his blood just as it was in Adolf Hitler’s and Hitler ultimately destroyed Germany. One has to understand his mentality which was best articulated by Willis Carto “If Satan himself, with all of his superhuman genius and diabolical ingenuity at his command, had tried to create a permanent disintegration and force for the destruction of the nations, he could have done no better than to invent the Jews.” RON PAUL: “THE THREAT FROM IRAN IS OVERBLOWN”
Ron Paul is Iran’s best friend in Congress. Paul’s pro-Iranian stance dates back to at least December 1979 when he voted against awarding compensation to the hostages who had just returned from Iran. In Big-Government Solutions Don’t Work (September 7, 2006) Paul said, In 1953, the U.S. and British overthrew the democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh and installed the Shah. His brutal regime lasted for over 25 years and ended with the Ayatollah taking power in 1979. Our support for the Shah incited the radicalization of the Shiite clerics in Iran, resulting in the hostage takeover.
A. J. WEBERMAN Everything is America’s fault, radical Islam has no responsibility for Iran becoming a theocracy. During Paul’s appearance on the Alex Jones bogus conspiracy show, Paul called allegations that Iran had attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States a “propaganda stunt” of the Obama administration. Paul: Well, obviously, if we’re doing it [assassinating the Iranian nuclear scientists] we shouldn’t be doing it. But this is an act of terrorism and we sympathize with them, they’re victims of terrorism and we condemn all terrorism. Obviously the Iranian government wouldn’t be killing their own scientists, so we should have great empathy for them. If we haven’t done it, we should prove to them or give them all reassurance that we have not done it. In answer to your questions, if we are doing it, we ought to quit. That wouldn’t make any sense. You know, participating in violent acts that would be equivalent to terrorism. At the same time, that’s all we talk about, going around the world in the global war on terrorism, so there’d be no consistency there. Well, it’s a real mess; we should have done a lot less a lot sooner. Everybody knows we have CIA that’s [sic] maneuvering in Iran. We had a drone shot down – maybe 2 drones shot down over Iran. We’re getting ready to put very punishing sanctions on them and disrupting the oil market. And you know, they’re a very weak nation. They’re responding in a natural way. But they don’t want trouble because they know they can be annihilated in about 40 minutes either by Israel or the United states. This whole idea that they want a fight, I think that is all concoction of the West to prepare the people for a war that is likely to come when we have a policy like this. I think it makes the 134
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI perfect argument for my non-interventionist foreign policy when we shouldn’t be engaged and stirring up trouble. And all these things we do to try to get rid of the regime in Iran right now actually plays into their hands because once we interfere and put on sanctions, this brings the Iranian people together. They’re having elections in a few months and Ahmadinejad is not that strong politically. But when we interfere as outsiders, those who are struggling to get control of their government and have a more sensible government, we have to drive them into the arms of the government. Just as we were brought together after 9-11, where there were no dissenters, we came together, there were no Republicans or Democrats, so we have to try to understand how our policies actually do the opposite of what we intend them to do.94
Paul sympathized with the Iranians. He didn’t want to see their scientists killed as he wanted them alive so they could produce an atomic device that will be used to wipe Israel off the face of the map. He is acting as a propagandist for Israel’s enemies. The last 94
A. J. WEBERMAN thing he wants to see is Iran’s bomb factories destroy by the United States due to some concocted idea that Iran wants a war. Paul opposed sanctions against Iran because he wants to see them economically strong with plenty of funds for their “destroy Israel” plans. In 2009 he stated: I rise in strongest opposition to this new round of sanctions on Iran, which is another significant step toward a US war on that country. I find it shocking that legislation this serious and consequential is brought up in such a cavalier manner. Suspending the normal rules of the House to pass legislation is a process generally reserved for “non-controversial” business such as the naming of post offices. Are we to believe that this House takes matters of war and peace as lightly as naming post offices?95 Statement on Mark-up of HR 1905, the Iran Threat Reduction Act of 2011 House Foreign Affairs Committee - Rep. Ron Paul, M.D. November 2, 2011: I would like to express my concerns over the Iran Threat Reduction Act of 2011 and my opposition to it being brought to the Floor for a vote. Let us be clear on one critical matter: the sanctions against Iran mandated by this legislation are definite steps toward a US attack on Iran. They will also, if actually applied, severely disrupt global trade and undermine the US economy, thereby harming our national security. I am surprised and disturbed that the committee viewed this aggressive legislation to be so bipartisan and uncontroversial that a recorded vote was not even called. Some may argue that we are pursuing sanctions so as to avoid war with Iran, but recent history teaches us otherwise. For how many years were sanctions placed on Iraq while we were told 95
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI they were necessary to avoid war? Thousands of innocent Iraqis suffered and died under US sanctions and still the US invaded, further destroying the country. Are we safer after spending a trillion dollars or more to destroy Iraq and then rebuild it? These new sanctions against Iran increasingly target other countries that seek to trade with Iran. The legislation will severely punish foreign companies or foreign subsidiaries of US companies if they do not submit to the US trade embargo on Iran. Some 15 years after the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 failed to bring Iran to its knees, it is now to be US foreign policy to threaten foreign countries and companies. The Iran Threat Reduction Act authorizes what will no doubt be massive amounts of US taxpayer money to undermine the Iranian government and foment another "Green Revolution" there. We will establish and prop up certain factions over others, send them enormous amounts of money, and attempt to fix any resulting elections so that our preferred candidates win. Considering the disturbing aftermath of our "democracy promotion" operations in places like Egypt, Iraq, Libya, where radical forces have apparently come out on top, it may be fair to conclude that such actions actually undermine US national security rather than bolster it.
A. J. WEBERMAN
On July 18, 1994, a terrorist attack was mounted on the Jewish community's AMIA building in Buenos Aires, Argentina, killing 85 and injuring over 250 people. The AMIA building was totally destroyed and heavy damage was caused to the surroundings. The attack was perpetrated by a suicide terrorist driving a car bomb containing hundreds of kilograms of explosives. On July 15, 2008 pretending to condemn the attack on the AMIA Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in July 1994 and for other purposes Ron Paul had this to say to Congress: Madam Speaker, as one who is most consistently opposed to war and violence, I join my colleagues in condemning the brutal and unjustified attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina 14 years ago. I do not support this resolution; however, as it misuses a tragedy 14 years ago in a foreign country to push for US war against Iran today. Although this resolution clearly blames Iran and Hezbollah for the bombing, in fact the investigation is ongoing and far from conclusive. In an article titled â€œU.S. Uses Probe to Pressure Iranâ€? the Wall Street Journal earlier this year suggested that renewed US interest in this 14 year old case is more related to politics than a genuine desire for justice. Reported the Journal, 138
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI â€œAs tensions between the U.S. and Iran persist, Washington and its allies are using an investigation into a 1994 terrorist attack in Argentina to maintain pressure on the Iranian regime. Behind the scenes, Bush administration officials are encouraging the probe, which centers on the bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. One U.S. goal is to cause legal problems for some of Iran's political leaders. Administration officials also hope to use the matter to highlight Iran's alleged role in financing and supporting terrorism around the world. Those pushing for a Unites States attack on Iran are using this tragic event to foment fear in the United States that Iran and Hezbollah are perpetrating terrorist acts in the Western Hemisphere. This is another in an ongoing series of resolutions we see on the House floor pushing us toward war against Iran. I have no doubt that we will see another similar resolution on the floor next week, and the week after, and so on until we find ourselves making another tragic mistake as we did in 2002 with H J Res 114 giving the president the authority to attack Iraq. I urge my colleagues to resist this push to war with Iran before it is too late.96 Once again Paul defended Iran by saying that there is no conclusive evidence that they were involved in the terrorist attack. Argentinean authorities conducted an extensive investigation into the AMIA attack, with significant international cooperation, and concluded that "the decision to carry out the AMIA attack was made, and the attack was orchestrated, by the highest officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran at the time, and that these officials instructed Lebanese Hezbollah -- a group that has historically been subordinated to the economic and political interests of the Tehran regime -- to carry out the attack." Iran and Hezbollah each had their 96
A. J. WEBERMAN own reasons for wanting to attack Israeli or Jewish targets in Argentina in 1994, as they had just two years earlier when they bombed the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires. At the time, Tehran was furious over Buenos Aires' decision to cease all nuclear cooperation with Iran in 1992 for fear that Iran's nuclear program was not limited to peaceful purposes. In 1994, Argentina terminated its nuclear cooperation. Hezbollah, meanwhile, sought to avenge the Israeli assassination of its leader, Abbas Moussawi, in 1992, and then Israel's capture of Hezbollah ally Mustapha Dirani in Southern Lebanon in May 1994. But Ron Paul knows better, his investigation was more far-reaching than that of the Argentine Government. On April 5, 2006 Paul delivered this pro-Iranian speech entitled Iran - The Next Neocon Target: If Iran had a nuclear weapon, why would this be different from Pakistan, India, and North Korea having one? Why does Iran have less right to a defensive weapon than these other countries? If Iran had a nuclear weapon, the odds of her initiating an attack against anybody-- which would guarantee her own annihilation -- are zero. And the same goes for the possibility she would place weapons in the hands of a non-state terrorist group. There’s been a lot of misinformation regarding Iran’s nuclear program. This distortion of the truth has been used to pump up emotions in Congress to pass resolutions condemning her and promoting UN sanctions. IAEA Director General Mohamed El-Baradi has never reported any evidence of “undeclared” sources or special nuclear material in Iran, or any diversion of nuclear material. We demand that Iran prove it is not in violation of nuclear agreements, which is asking them impossibly to prove a negative. El-Baradi states Iran is in
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI compliance with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) required IAEA safeguard agreement. We forget that the weapons we feared Saddam Hussein had been supplied to him by the U.S., and we refused to believe UN inspectors and the CIA that he no longer had them. Likewise, Iran received her first nuclear reactor from us. Now we’re hysterically wondering if someday she might decide to build a bomb in self interest. There are some who may not agree strongly with any of my arguments, and instead believe the propaganda: Iran and her President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, are thoroughly irresponsible and have threatened to destroy Israel. So all measures must be taken to prevent Iran from getting nukes-- thus the campaign to intimidate and confront Iran. First, Iran doesn’t have a nuke and is nowhere close to getting one, according to the CIA. If they did have one, using it would guarantee almost instantaneous annihilation by Israel and the United States. Hysterical fear of Iran is way out of proportion to reality.97 Paul wants to see Iran get nuclear weapons more than anything in the world. He calls them “defensive weapons.” But what country is Iran threatened by? Paul quotes El-Baradi the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency as saying that Iran is not developing a bomb. IAEA has now joined the ranks of those who are warning of the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran. Iran is quite possibly developing nuclear bombs -- with this assessment, the IAEA has taken a clear stance against Tehran for the first time. Under former director general, Egypt's Mohamed El-Baradi, who headed the IAEA from 1997 to 2009, the reports from the Vienna-based agency always read the same: The IAEA had asked 97
. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 358
A. J. WEBERMAN Iran for more cooperation and transparency, but Tehran had turned a deaf ear and only granted limited access to IAEA inspectors. Year after year, the conclusions that El-Baradei drew from the brief reports sounded similar: There was no proof against the Iranians, so they were left alone. In 2009, he was succeeded by Yukiya Amano of Japan who reported that a weapons program was indeed underway. Paul wants Israel to wait until Tel Aviv is destroyed then retaliate. During a town hall meeting in December 2011 Paul was asked what President Paul would do about Iran: Well I’d be provoking them a lot less because they’re reacting to the provoking of the West saying “we’re gonna put on sanctions.” We have them surrounded with nuclear weapons and we’re claiming that they’re gonna build a nuclear weapon and there’s no evidence for this. So we’re just looking for trouble. We’re building the war propaganda against Iran just as we did against Iraq. And people want to go to war against Iran. And I think they’re reacting to the provocations of so many other people saying that “we’re liable to bomb you because you are building a nuclear weapon.” But our CIA doesn’t confirm that nor does the UN confirm that. So they’re acting actually in a rational manner because they’re saying “they’re gonna attack us and start bombing us.” They have to say “well, we don’t have any nuclear weapons, we can’t really defend ourselves. So we might sink a boat, sink a ship out there in the Persian Gulf”, hoping that we might back off. I just think we’re treating the whole thing wrong. Paul knows that Iran is attempting to construct an atomic weapon to use against Israel so he does everything he can to facilitate this project. He twists the truth and accuses America of provoking a peaceful Iran. By the time Paul gave this speech there was plenty of evidence Iran is building the bomb from the UN inspectors yet he disregards it. Is Paul on some intelligence 142
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI committee in Congress that makes him privy to classified information? This is a lie that Paul knows to be untrue. But what do you expect from a lying Nazi scum? Notice how Paul never mentions Israel by name but says “so many other people.” If he used to word Israel too often people would get a better idea of where he is really coming from. Paul says that the threat to sink ships passing through the Straits of Harmuz with conventional weapons means Iran lacks atomic weapons. There is no logic there just propaganda. Paul’s most convincing argument is that America is “building the war propaganda against Iran just as we did against Iraq.” This is why a lot of Iraqi vets support Paul. THE BOYS WHO CRIED WOLFOWITZ There is an Aesop fable about a shepherd boy who pretended that his flock was threatened by a wolf. When the villagers came to help him he told them “I was just puttin’ you on” and laughed. "Don't cry 'wolf', shepherd boy," said the villagers, "when there's no wolf!" They went grumbling back down the hill back to their village. When a real wolf came along and the boy shouted Wolf! Wolf! no one believed him and the boy was eaten alive. The neo-cons cried “wolfowitz” when it came to the dangers emanating from Iraq and now when a real danger of WMDs comes from Iran, their warnings and the warning of others are discredited. The New York Times reported “[Those who believe Iran is developing a bomb] criticize the C.I.A. for being overly cautious in its assessments of Iran, suggesting that it is perhaps overcompensating for its faulty intelligence assessments in 2002 about Iraq’s purported weapons programs, which turned out not to exist.” The Times also reported: Haunting such discussions [of Iran’s nuclear weapons program] is the memory of the Iraq war. The intelligence on weapons of mass destruction, which was one of the Bush administration’s main rationales for the invasion, proved to be devastatingly wrong. And the news media, including The New York 143
A. J. WEBERMAN Times, which ultimately apologized to readers for some of its coverage of claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, are again under scrutiny by critics wary of exaggerated threats.98 The neo-cons are responsible for the rise of Ron Paul and Nazism in America. When they instigated the war in Iraq they played right into the hands of the Nazis who claimed that the Jews were behind almost all major wars. Neo-con Paul Wolfowitz and his crew followed the wishes of the rightwing Likud Party, that wanted revenge for the SCUD missiles that hit Israel during the Gulf War, missiles that had the potential to turn Israel into one big gas chamber, missiles that could have killed Wolfowitzâ€™s sister who lives in Israel, or could have killed Wolfowitz himself, who was visiting Israel during these attacks.99 Israelis had to drape plastic across their windows and wear gas masks not knowing what those warheads contained. They were terrorized by Saddam who should have been taken out immediately however the US did not want Israel involved in the war. Later there was no reprisal against Iraq for this act of war and this made Israel appear weak. In 1992, while he was working under then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney, Wolfowitz, upset by President George H. W. Bushâ€™s decision to leave Saddam Hussein's regime in place after the 1991 Gulf War argued in a draft version of a Defense Policy Guidance paper that the U.S. should use pre-emptive force to prevent countries from developing weapons of mass destruction, and act alone if necessary. Although the draft guidance was quashed soon after it was leaked to the New York Times, these doctrines later found their
. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/22/world/middleeast/in-din-over-iranechoes-of-iraq-war-news-analysis.html 99
. George Bush, A World Transformed, Knopf September 14, 1998.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI way into George W. Bush’s national security strategy. 100 Wolfowitz had planned this war years in advance. Jewish neo-cons were placed in key positions in the Department of Defense. Obama’s choice of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense is his answer to the neo-cons. Ron Paul remarked: Many who object to our continued foreign policy of endless war and empire overseas feel encouraged by Obama’s choice of Senator Hagel to head the Defense Department. Hagel has shown some admirable willingness to advise caution overseas. He is seen as unenthusiastic over the prospects of a US war on Iran, which is certainly to be welcomed. Nevertheless because he does represent a more moderate voice in foreign policy than the neoconservatives can tolerate, they are dragging his name through the mud. In choosing Hagel, then, we can hope the president is signaling that he will pursue a less aggressive foreign policy in his second term. A massive propaganda operation was begun. The people involved in this op were too smart to believe the lies they generated. For example Dr. Laurie Mylroie the descendant of Holocaust survivors received her Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard University and her B.A. from Cornell. She was an Assistant Professor in Harvard's Political Science Department. In 1990 she co-wrote, with New York Times reporter Judith Miller, the pro-war book “Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf.” Next, she became an Associate Professor in the Strategy Department at the U.S. Naval War College. Subsequently, she was a member of the staff of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy with Martin Indyk. Mylroie 100
. Interhemispheric Resource Center Profile of Lewis Libby http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/libby/libby_body.html
A. J. WEBERMAN and Eleanor Wolfowitz, the former wife of Paul Wolfowitz, who lost most of his extended family in the holocaust, wrote Study of Revenge that alleged Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the first World Trade Center bombing, was an Iraqi mole. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who pretended that he bought this nonsense, asked Bush to declare Ramzi Yousef an enemy combatant and transfer him to a U.S. military installation to force him to confess that he was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent. This caused a top Bureau of Prisons official to make an unauthorized entry to Yousef's cell at Florence, Admax Penitentiary to see if he would go along with this sham in order to lessen the harshness of his prison conditions. By 2003 this theory had been dismissed as one that was concocted to link Saddam Hussein with 9/11, since, as a result of the arrest of Ramzi Yousef’s uncle, Khalid Shaikh Muhammed, his family tree was revealed, and it was demonstrated that Yousef was not a mole but KSM’s nephew. But Mylroie continued the deception and even did a piece for the neo-con Wall Street Journal claiming this new evidence proved she was right. When the CIA failed to find a link between Saddam’s Iraq and Al-Qaeda Wolfowitz had Douglas J. Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, form a special unit in the Pentagon to link the two. Feith’s unit was known as the Office of Special Plans; actually it was the Office of War Propaganda. Before he became part of the Wolfowitz Pack Feith “represented a leading Israeli armaments manufacturer (the IDF – the Israeli Defense Forces) in establishing joint ventures with leading U.S. aerospace manufacturers for manufacture and sale of missile systems, to the U.S. Department of Defense and worldwide.” 101 A report by the Pentagon's acting inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, stated Feith, ''developed, produced and then disseminated alternative intelligence assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship, which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the consensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision101
. James Zogby “Revolving Door Poses Danger to Defense” Baltimore Sun August 7, 2001.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI makers.'' Eric S. Edelman, an undersecretary of defense, attacked the Gimble Report. Feith was pleased that the inspector general had cleared him of violating laws or Defense Department policies. Richard Perle and David Wurmser aided Feith. Richard Perle, a former aide to the proIsrael Senator from Washington “Scoop” Jackson was an assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration, and a former member of George W. Bush’s Defense Policy Board who had strong ties to Likud. Pearle served as a consultant to Douglas Feith when Feith ran a firm that was involved with the secular government of Turkey.102 Richard Perle resigned from the Defense Policy Board in February 2004,103 after he called for the head of the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency to step down due to the fact that no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.104 I encountered Perle while working as a researcher for Senator Richard Schweiker, (R- Penn). My associate, Michael Canfield had visited Scoop Jackson’s office and displayed the tramp shots to Perle, who was his aide. Perle in turn called the FBI and offered to act as an informer on Canfield. It was no coincidence that Iraqi War Hawk David Wurmser was married to an Israeli terrorism expert at the Hudson Institute, Meyrav Wurmser. Her Ph.D. thesis was on the ideas that formed the Likud Party. Dr. Wurmser taught political science at the United States Naval Academy. She writes articles for such neo-con pro-Israel publications as the Weekly Standard.105 David Wurmser was a special advisor to Vice President Cheney and a former Director of 102
. James Zogby New Questions About Feith Washington Watch May 13, 2001. 103
. Wall Street Journal Review and Outlook February 26, 2004. . Eric Rosenberg “Advisor Want U.S. Intelligence Chiefs to Quit” The Toronto Star February 18, 2004 105 . http://www.sipr.org/default.aspx?action=PublicationDetails&id=178 104
A. J. WEBERMAN Middle East Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, which was behind the Iraqi National Congress. The AEI had published a book written by a man who claimed to be a former Iraqi nuclear scientist which stated the Iraq was hard at work building an atomic bomb. This Attack Iraq Pack cooked up numerous other stories of Iraq’s potential deployment of WMD’s and attempts by Iraq to purchase yellow cake uranium in Niger. In his State of the Union speech on January 28, 2003 Bush said, “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” WMD investigator Joseph C. Wilson debunked this lie in February 2002 and as a result neo-con “Scooter” Libby released the fact that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a CIA agent106 to the press as a reprisal against Wilson. Wolfowitz had hired Libby in 1981 as a speechwriter and an Asia analyst at the State Department under President Ronald Reagan and in 1989 as a strategist in the Defense Department, headed by Cheney in the administration of George H. W. Bush. Between government stints, Libby practiced law with the firm of Leonard Garment, counsel to President Richard M. Nixon. Libby was convicted for perjury in connection with the Plame Affair. Before his sentence was commuted he was hired by the Hudson Institute.107 This grouping thought it represented the interests of Israel but ultimately these deceptions could be a contributing factor to the destruction of the Jewish State. The neo-cons removal of Saddam shifted the balance of power to Iran. It also shifted the balance of power in the Republican Party. These know-it-alls gave Ron Paul, a Nazi intent on the destruction of Israel, ammunition to use against
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI his Republican rivals. Now Paul can put forth the irrational argument that if Iran had nuclear weapons it might contribute to world peace: I do not quite have the concern that others have expressed that Iran is on the verge of having a nuclear weapon. They have never been found in violation. There has been a lot of talk and a lot of accusation, but technically they have never been found in any violation. There has been no talk, it has been implied, but there has been no serious talk that Iran is a threat to our national security. There is no way. Even if they had nuclear weapons, they are not going to be a threat to our national security. Pakistan, that is not a democratic nation. It happens to be a military dictatorship. They have nuclear weapons. India has nuclear weapons. As a matter of fact, the nuclear weapons serve as a balance of power between two countries. The Soviets, had 30,000 nuclear weapons, and we followed a policy of containment. We did not say we have to go into the Soviet Union and bomb their establishment. No. Finally that problem dissipated. And yet we create unnecessary problems for ourselves. We go looking for trouble, and I see this as very detrimental for what we are doing with this resolution.108 Shi‘a teachings promise the return of a messiah. For some Shi‘a the messiah will be Muhammad al-Mahdi the Twelfth Imam, who went into occultation in 874 AD and is expected to return before the Day of Judgment to lead the righteous against the forces of evil. The Soviets did not believe that the destruction of Israel will bring about the return of the Mahdi, the Iranians do, nor did the Soviets believe in an afterlife in an Islamic paradise. Iran has made it very clear that it wishes to destroy Israel. This is from the semi-official Iranian news agency. 108
A. J. WEBERMAN Tehran, October 26 – Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be “wiped off the map.” “The establishment of the Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world,” the President told a conference in Tehran entitled The World without Zionism. “The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land,” he said. “As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map,” said Ahmadinejad, referring to the late founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Imam Khomeini.109 The “wiped off the face of the map” quotation is a transliteration of vanish from the page of time. The remark was made at a conference titled World Without Zionism, a play on Karl Marx’s World Without Jews. But when the Nazis like Stormfront and Paul and their self-hating Jewish puppets translate it they claim that it merely means regime change in Israel to a “non-Zionist” state. So don’t worry about Ahmadinejad: he is not another Hitler but just someone who wants to help out the Jews with regime change.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI On Al-Quds Day 2012 (also known as Death to Israel Day) the Iranian Hitler made it quite clear that if millions upon millions of Jews died in an Atomic Holocaust the world would be free of evil: It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionism counters human perfection and human societies and is the main cause of human decline. A minority group that is anti-humane and corrupted and is against divine values has been organized and is countering all the divine values. These are deviated persons who merely think about wealth and power and dominating others. For more than two thousand years, and at least four hundred years, that a small number of Zionists have caused turbulence in human societies and have caused irreparable loses. Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned by these Zionists. World War I and II - based on clear documents - have been aimed at domination and the wars have been planned and designed by behind the scenes Zionists. The Zionists since they dominated the US administration they have brought under the control all the affairs of the world. A few people acting behind the scĂ¨ne of US administrations and they have under the control all the points of power in the world and they dominate all the banking system of the world and also they have dominated the world media. And they are using all these tools for destroying values, cultures, nations and the existence of countries. You see that wherever there is a major moral destruction and decadence. You see there are Zionists companies and corporations and wherever there is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists are involved. The formation of the Zionist regime is a pretext and an opportunity for actually supporting certain governments, the governments that serve the 151
A. J. WEBERMAN Zionists. They want to create convergence because instead of religion, instead of God [Allah], instead of the prophet [Mohammad], the divine book [the Qurâ€™an] and all the perfect values they want to destroy all these and instead create those governments that serve the Zionists. And the Zionist regime is the tool that is used by the Zionists for dominating the Middle East, and the region, and the world. The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to all humanity and the destruction of the personality and character of nations and human beings. You know they are involved in the inter-racial [racist] teachings. They only consider themselves as humans and they consider others as animals. They actually, the Zionists, consider [as] authorized the killing of humans and the Zionist plundering the wealth of others. You see the Western governments, they tolerate being insulted, but they do not tolerate any criticism of the Zionist regime and they justify all the crimes committed by the Zionist regime, because they rely on the Zionists and the Zionists pay them money for propaganda. And itâ€™s a party comprising seven to eight thousand people and they are running all the affairs. Itâ€™s a Satanic party today. Fighting the Zionist regime is equal to protecting the rights of all humans and also defending human dignity and opening the way for saving humans from colonialism and arrogance and saving humans from poverty and misery. The whole world should know, with the grace of God, protecting the Zionist regime has turned into a commitment by many countries, Western powers, on the other side. On the other hand you see that with the grace of god world al-Quds day has turned into a focal point for unity and solidarity of Muslims aimed at eliminating this fake Zionist regime. For several hundred years 152
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI humanity has been just countering the Zionists and for several hundred for almost one hundred years you see the nations have been captivated by the Zionist management. You see in a big country like the US the presidential hopefuls they have to bow before the Zionists and show their commitment otherwise they will not have the chance in participating in the American elections… Dominating Palestine has been a historical wish by the Zionists; tens of conflicts have been set up in order to attain this wish. And close to seventy years designs have been made and crimes have been committed for setting up this fake regime Zionist regime and all the human boundaries have been trampled upon so that the Zionist regime would be imposed on the region. And all the might and capabilities of the arrogant powers were used and they managed to obtain success to some extent, [however] exactly at a time when they thought the Zionist regime has been stabilized and it has been accepted by the regional nations due to a major move by the Iranian nation known as the Islamic Revolution guided by a divine man and subsequently with the awareness of nations and their movement against Zionists and the revitalization of Palestinian resistance in the past two or three decades the foundations of the Zionist regime has been jeopardized and the philosophy behind its formation has been put to question. The Zionists they felt the danger and you see the Western nations are after saving the Zionist regime and prior to this they were saving the Zionist so they would have the [?] of restoring themselves… Most dictators trample upon the rights on nations. The majority of these dictators depend on 153
A. J. WEBERMAN the Zionists and the arrogants. These dictators have no way but to be dependent on them. But hopefully the nations have been awakened and they are demanding their rights. All nations have been captivated even in the United States and Europe. Most governments in the West are affiliated to the Zionists and the people have no right to choose. They [the Zionists] have formed several parties and in fact when they become tired of one party they have no choice but to depend on, resort to, another party and all these parties are after serving the Zionists. And you see the people are shouting in the US and Europe but there is no one to save the people. And of course the existence of the Zionist regime is a guarantee for this plundering. Itâ€™s a base, itâ€™s a focal point. The arrogant powers overlook the dignity and respect of all humans including Muslims. A Muslim nation can destroy all these arrogant powers and justice is the opposite aside of arrogance and they will victimize everything and in order to obtain power and wealth and any negligence can cause irreparable losses. Any negligence will cause a failure. Today they are engaged in a complicated scheme and that means a two state plan. The Zionist regime is a cancerous tumor. Even a single cancerous cell in an inch of the Palestine land the same situation will continue in the future. The Zionists are domineering elements and want to they are after expansionism. An academic colleague of ours who is at the US met me in one of my trips overseas. I mean an Iranian met me he said that you are right concerning the Zionists. He said we were working in an academic team and there was a single 154
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI person who was a pro-Zionist he wanted to become a member and the other 15 members opposed his membership and he just kept coming and going and I felt pity and I asked the other members for this proZionist person to become a member of the academic board after six or seven years I returned and I saw none of the members are present there and all of the members are new and find one of those old members and I say what happened to the team and he said that single pro Zionist person has in fact led to the expulsion of all the other members and he has brought his pro-Zionist friends to become members of that academic board. The presence of the Zionist in a single inch of the Palestinian lands is dangerous let alone having a government there. This is my understanding of the ongoing situation. This is my personal understanding and this is my understanding this is the scheme that has been designed do not level any allegations against me later on this is my personal understanding and in fact the Zionists are after just having a theatrical performance and they later would say that okay we going accept a two state government, a person over the line would be granted to Palestinians the Zionists would become independent and even if ten percent of the land is given to the Zionist that would still be dangerous and a two state solution means a historical for the Zionists to restore themselves and in fact accepting the two state solution means just losing and eliminating all the efforts that have been made for hundreds of years. And any person who accepts that two state solution he wonâ€™t be in line with the interest of world nations. All world nations must pay attention to this - the criterion for the honesty of rulers and politicians is contingent on restoring the rights of nations and also 155
A. J. WEBERMAN combating the Zionist regime. One cannot say that he is that he is after restoring the rights of nations and he is in line with the Zionist policies then one cannot believe in him. It is not possible to have a person who doesnâ€™t combat the Zionist regime who reconciles and compromises with the Zionist regime and at the same time he cannot claim to be an advocate of freedom. So one should be cautious so that the NATO forces will not claim to be advocates of freedom and freedom will not be established with the bullets of NATO forces. What matters is the independence and the basic rights of nations. In conclusion I want to address the arrogant powers and the Zionists. Open your ears! The spring you spoke about is not merely an Arabist spring. This is a starting point. An Arabist spring is good but you should know that the spring of humanity will unfold. The Western and American springs will be unfolded soon with the grace of Allah. The nations are going through the process of awaking. How much longer can you engage in acts of deception? He said that I want to make a change and everybody thought that he wants to make a change everyone thought he wants to make changes within in the US and later he said that he meant the changes in the Middle East. I am telling you it is to your benefit to set the Zionists aside and recognize the rights of nations and also recognize your interests and pursue your interests within your own geographical borders. You should know that a new spring will be unfolding if you do not pay attention to this piece of advice. The nations will in fact contribute to your decline.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Stop supporting the Zionist regime and they will be of no use for you. The regional nations have been awakened. Perhaps though instigating tribal differences you may have a chance for a short period of time. This will be for the short term. You should honestly help the regional nations. You should know that very soon the nations will soon eliminate and put an end to the Zionist regime. You are after a new Middle East and we are also after a new Middle East. A new Middle East will definitely take shape but with the grace of Allah and the help of nations there will be no trace of the existence of the Americans and the Zionists. Stop insulting the Iranian nation and correct your literature. You should be friends of the Iranian nation that is your benefit and the Iranian nation has always managed to bury all its ill wishes in the course of history and you are the weakest and the same will happen to you and this will only bring about embarrassment for you will bring about shame for you and the domination of the Zionists will be destroyed and we have bright prospect ahead. Communism is gone and capitalism will also be destroyed and the Imam of the time will establish the divine governance and the true prosperity of humanity will be materialized and we hope for such a day. Letâ€™s dispense with the theory, put forth by many self-hating Jews on the Left, that Ahmadinejad only hates Zionists and not Jews. Ahmadinejad made it clear that he is referring to Jews when he uses the word Zionist. For more than two thousand years, and at least four hundred years, that a small number of Zionists have 157
A. J. WEBERMAN caused turbulence in human societies and have caused irreparable loses – Ahmadinejad. There was no Zionist movement 2,000 years ago however there were Jews. Hitler: Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before - the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some two thousand years ago - a civilization which was driven to its ruin through this same Jewish people. - Munich April 12, 1922 It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionism counters human perfection and human societies and is the main cause of human decline – Ahmadinejad. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote that the Jews were responsible for all the evil and troubles in the world. This idea was reflected in the propaganda pamphlet (1930) of the Nazi propagandist Goebbels: Why do we oppose the Jews? We are enemies of the Jews, because we are fighters for the freedom of the German people. The Jew is the cause and the beneficiary of our misery…he is the real cause for our loss of the Great War…that is the reason why we, as nationalists and as socialists, oppose the Jew. He has corrupted our race, fouled our morals, 158
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI undermined our customs, and broken our power. The Jew is the plastic demon of the decline of mankind. . . .We are enemies of the Jews because we belong to the German people. The jaw is our greatest misfortune. . The Nazi Rudolph Hess expressed the same views according to the retired medical superintendent of a British Prison, Dr N. R. Phillips, “In my experience Hess’s strongest delusion was in regard to the Jews. He regarded them as responsible for all the troubles in the world. He thought they exercised a hypnotic influence over everyone and had a hand in everything unpleasant that happened, even to himself.”110 World War I and II - based on clear documents have been aimed at domination and the wars have been planned and designed by behind the scenes Zionists – Ahmadinejad. Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless? Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals? – Ahmadinejad UN Speech 2011 Ahmadinejad objected to the A-bomb being dropped on Nazi ally Japan. What these statements reveal is that we are dealing with someone who is totally insane. Hitler believed in conspiracy theories that regarded the Jews as Communists and claimed that they had deliberately made Germany lose World War I by causing strikes, subversion and revolution on the home front. He also said that they had deliberately caused the Great Depression. Hitler never said the Jews CAUSED World War I. He also blamed the Jews 110
. The Madness of Rudolph Hess - and the Places It Led Him Suite101.com http://suite101.com/article/the-madness-of-rudolph-hess--and-the-places-it-led-him-a372724#ixzz241RKtDfv
A. J. WEBERMAN for the surrender of the Germans and the Treaty of Versailles and for the disarmament that followed. But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its arms. The conservative politicians have neither right nor reason on their side when they appeal to disarmament as the cause which compelled them to adopt a policy of prudence (that is to say, cowardice). Here, again, the contrary is the truth. Disarmament is the result of their lack of spirit. Mein Kampf. You see that wherever there is a major moral destruction and decadence. You see there are Zionists companies and corporations and wherever there is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists are involved â€“ Ahmadinejad. What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life, into the mystery of which I penetrated little by little. Was there any shady undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate? On putting the probing knife carefully to that kind of abscess one immediately discovered, like a maggot in a putrescent body, a little Jew who was often blinded by the sudden light - Mein Kampf. A few people acting behind the scĂ¨ne of US administrations and they have under the control all 160
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI the points of power in the world and they dominate all the banking system of the world and also they have dominated the world media – Ahmadinejad. I gradually discovered that the Social Democratic Press was predominantly controlled by Jews. But I did not attach special importance to this circumstance, for the same state of affairs existed also in other newspapers. But there was one striking fact in this connection. It was that there was not a single newspaper with which Jews were connected that could be spoken of as National, in the meaning that my education and convictions attached to that word - Mein Kampf. The function of the so-called liberal Press was to dig the grave for the German people and REICH. No mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To them the spreading of falsehood is as much a vital necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their sole task is to break the national backbone of the people, thus preparing the nation to become the slaves of international finance and its masters, the Jews - Mein Kampf. From the political point of view it is not in the interests of Great Britain that Germany should be ruined even still more, but such a proceeding would be very much in the interests of the international money-markets manipulated by the Jew - Mein Kampf. A minority group that is anti-humane and corrupted and is against divine values has been organized and is countering all the divine values – Ahmadinejad. Their very existence is an incarnate denial of the 161
A. J. WEBERMAN beauty of God's image in His creation. - Mein Kampf. Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned by these Zionists – Ahmadinejad. That is why the Jewish people, despite the intellectual powers with which they are apparently endowed, have not a culture-certainly not a culture of their own. The culture which the Jew enjoys to-day is the product of the work of others and this product is debased in the hands of the Jew Mein Kampf. And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousand people and they are running all the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today – Ahmadinejad. By presenting his doctrine as part and parcel of a just re-vindication of social rights, the Jew propagated the doctrine all the more effectively. But at the same time he provoked the opposition of decent people who refused to admit these demands which, because of the form and pseudo-philosophical trimmings in which they are presented, seemed fundamentally unjust and impossible for realization. For, under the cloak of purely social concepts there are hidden aims which are of a Satanic character - Mein Kampf. He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if in the imagination of our people the Jew is pictured as the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil Mein Kampf. 162
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI And the Zionist regime is the tool that is used by the Zionists for dominating the Middle East, and the region, and the world. The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to all humanity and the destruction of the personality and character of nations and human beings – Ahmadinejad. The Jewish domination in the State seems now so fully assured that not only can he now afford to call himself a Jew once again, but he even acknowledges freely and openly what his ideas are on racial and political questions. A section of the Jews avows itself quite openly as an alien people, but even here there is another falsehood. When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a highschool for the training of other swindlers - Mein Kampf. You see that wherever there is a major moral destruction and decadence. You see there are Zionists companies and corporations and wherever there is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists are involved – Ahmadinejad. 163
A. J. WEBERMAN On April 1, 1933, a week after Hitler became dictator of Germany, he ordered a boycott of Jewish shops, banks, offices and department stores. They want to create convergence because instead of religion, instead of God [Allah], instead of the prophet [Mohammad], the divine book [the Qur’an] and all the perfect values they want to destroy all these and instead create those governments that serve the Zionists – Ahmadinejad. Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord - Mein Kampf. The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to all humanity and the destruction of the personality and character of nations and human beings. You know they are involved in the inter-racial [racist] teachings. They only consider themselves as humans and they consider others as animals. They actually, the Zionists, consider [as] authorized the killing of humans and the Zionist plundering the wealth of others – Ahmadinejad. The Nazis are found of making reference to the Talmudic passage known as Baba Mezia 114a-114b. This is made reference to in the Jew hating forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, one of Hitler’s favorite books. To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated by the Jews. They are based on a forgery; the Frankfurter Zeitung moans 164
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI and screams once every week: the best proof that they are authentic. What many Jews may do unconsciously is here consciously exposed. And that is what matters. It is completely indifferent from what Jewish brain these disclosures originate; the important thing is that with positively terrifying certainty they reveal the nature and activity of the Jewish people and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. The best criticism applied to them, however, is reality. Anyone who examines the historical development of the last hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at once understand the screaming of the Jewish press. For once this book has become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken The Protocols claimed this is a Talmudic passage: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings, but beasts." Here is an accurate translation: R. Shimon b. Yochai said: Graves of non-Jews do not transmit ritual impurity, as it is written, "And you, my flock, the flock of my pastures, you are Adam" (Ezekiel 34:31) --only you are called "Adam." We learn the law of ritual impurity from another verse that uses the word "Adam." "Only you are called 'Adam'" means that the term "Adam"-"man"-in particular applies to Jews. Other words, such as "Ha'adam" - "the man" - also apply to non-Jews. So the Gomorra is saying that the word "Adam" without the definite article only refers to Jews. This passage in the Talmud says nothing at all about who is a human being. Genesis states that we are all descendants of Adam and Eve making everyone human. And besides that, the supposed quote contains a completely fabricated sentence: "They are beasts." It was Hitler who labeled people as sub-human untermenchen, not the Talmud or Gomorra. During a speech in May 165
A. J. WEBERMAN 1923, Hitler had said, "The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but not human. They cannot be human in the sense of being an image of God, the Eternal. The Jews are the image of the Devil.” Today they are engaged in a complicated scheme and that means a two state plan. The Zionist regime is a cancerous tumor. Even a single cancerous cell in an inch of the Palestine land the same situation will continue in the future – Ahmadinejad. In 1941 Hitler proclaimed “The Jews are a cancer on the breast of Germany.” On September 16, 1919, Hitler issued his first written comment on the so-called Jewish Question. He defined the Jews as a race and not a religious community, characterized the effect of a Jewish presence as a “race-tuberculosis of the peoples," and identified the initial goal of a German government to be discriminatory legislation against Jews. You are after a new Middle East and we are also after a new Middle East. A new Middle East will definitely take shape but with the grace of Allah and the help of nations there will be no trace of the existence of the Americans and the Zionists. The ultimate goal must definitely be the removal of the Jews altogether! – Hitler 1919. And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousand people and they are running all the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today. At the beginning of the War, or even during the War, if twelve or fifteen thousand of these Jews who were corrupting the nation had been forced to submit to poison-gas, just as hundreds of thousands of our best German workers from every social stratum and from every trade and calling had 166
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI to face it in the field, then the millions of sacrifices made at the front would not have been in vain. On the contrary: If twelve thousand of these malefactors had been eliminated in proper time probably the lives of a million decent men, who would be of value to Germany in the future, might have been saved. But it was in accordance with bourgeois 'statesmanship' to hand over, without the twitch of an eyelid, millions of human beings to be slaughtered on the battlefields, while they looked upon ten or twelve thousand public traitors, profiteers, usurers and swindlers, as the dearest and most sacred national treasure and proclaimed their persons to be inviolable. Indeed it would be hard to say what is the most outstanding feature of these bourgeois circles: mental debility, moral weakness and cowardice, or a mere down at heel mentality. It is a class that is certainly doomed to go under but, unhappily, it drags down the whole nation with it into the abyss - Mein Kampf. The whole world should know, with the grace of God, protecting the Zionist regime has turned into a commitment by many countries, Western powers, on the other side – Ahmadinejad. And the same is true of democracy. In general even in the early days both England and France had already been bound with the fetters of slavery. With, I might say, a brazen security these States are fettered with Jewish chains.111 – Hitler 1922 Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned by these Zionists. World War I and II - based on clear documents - have been aimed at domination and the wars have been planned and designed by behind the scenes Zionists – Ahmadinejad. Although the Jews were lurking unseen as wire111
A. J. WEBERMAN pullers in the background - Mein Kampf. It is clear that Ahmadinejad is a follower of Adolf Hitler and considers himself the new Hitler, but according to Paul Ahmadinejad poses no threat to the United States or Israel, even with nuclear weapons. Paul wants to lift economic sanctions on Iran. He wants to re-establish diplomatic relations with Iran. Paul loves Ahmadinejad because he knows he is a Nazi who wants to murder millions of Jews and Paul is also a Nazi who wants to murder millions of Jews so Paul uses him as his proxy. Paul has to use code words but just as Hitler made it clear to German people what he had in store for the Jews Ahmadinejad does the same: May 11, 2006 to a student rally in Jakarta, Indonesia “Israel is a regime based on evil that cannot continue and one day will vanish.” This is from the Iranian Hitler’s speeches to Iran's Holocaust Conference January 30, 2008: I warn you to abandon the filthy Zionist entity, which has reached the end of the line. It has lost its reason to be and will sooner or later fall. The ones who still support the criminal Zionists should know that the occupiers' days are numbered. … Accept that the life of Zionists will sooner or later come to an end. Thanks to people's wishes and G-d's will the trend for the existence of the Zionist regime is downwards and this is what G-d has promised and what all nations want…Just as the Soviet Union was wiped out and today does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soon be wiped out!!112 Representatives Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) were the only two lawmakers who voted against a resolution condemning 112
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Ahmadinejad for his statements calling for the destruction of Israel and genocide of the Jews. Mr. Speaker, I join with my colleagues here in condemning the statement reportedly made by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that “Israel must be wiped off the map.” I reject this statement and any such statement by any government anywhere because I reject the notion that the use or threat of violence is an appropriate way to solve international disputes. While rejecting comments by Iran that seem to advocate the use of force, I must also strongly object to using Achmadinajad’s statement as an excuse to escalate our own rhetoric and strengthen our anti-Iranian and anti-Muslim policies. This condemnable statement is nevertheless being conveniently used to expand our policy of remaking the Middle East in our own image. I do find it interesting to hear my colleagues condemning Iran’s implied threat of force while in the same breath calling for the use of force against Iran. Ironically, it is small step from repeatedly calling Iran “our enemy” with increasingly militaristic rhetoric to calling for Iran to be “wiped off the map.” We should keep this in mind as we condemn the rhetoric of others while repeating similar rhetoric ourselves.113 The resolution outlined the reasons why the Iranian leader was in violation of the UN Genocide Convention. Calling On The United Nations Security Council To Charge Iranian President With Certain Violations Because Of His Calls For Destruction Of Israel Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this resolution. This resolution is an exercise in 113
. Congressional Record, V. 151, Pt. 18, October 27 to November 7, 2005 page 24208
A. J. WEBERMAN propaganda that serves one purpose: to move us closer to initiating a war against Iran. Citing various controversial statements by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, this legislation demands that the United Nations Security Council charge Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.114 Paul opposes all international bodies that investigate and punish world leader and military men for genocide because someday he might be called before one: Supporters of the International Criminal Court are quick to say that the Court is modeled on the Nuremberg tribunal set up after World War II, but nothing could be further from the truth. Nuremberg was a trial initiated and prosecuted by sovereign nations. It was a reassertion of national sovereignty over the crimes of a regime that disregarded the concept that saw other sovereign countries as merely “living space” for their own people. As one analyst recently wrote, “the Nuremberg tribunal, unlike the Hague tribunal, was not really an international tribunal at all. The judges quite specifically stated that the act of promulgating the Nuremberg charter was ‘the exercise of sovereign legislative power of the countries to which the German Reich unconditionally surrendered.’ There was no pretense that the ‘international community’ was prosecuting the Germans.”115 114
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=156&Itemid=60 115
. http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa77896.000/hfa77896_0.H TM
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In October 2009, Ron Paul and Kucinich were also the only two Members of Congress to vote against H. Res. 175 condemning the government of Iran for “state-sponsored persecution of its Bahá’í minority and its continued violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights.” The Iranians made it clear that they want to see Israel destroyed with nuclear weapons “wiped off the map” but the Nazis, like Paul, want to deny this to prevent Israel from launching a preemptive strike. It is also not advantageous for them to admit it as it would reveal the true nature of the Iranian régime and further alarm certain righteous Christian elements within the United States116 like Congresswoman Michele Bachmann: We know without a shadow of doubt that Iran will take a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe out our ally Israel, off the face of the map. And they’ve stated they will use it against the United States of America. We would be fools and knaves to ignore their purposes and their plan. This is a posting from Stormfront praising Paul: Paul said that the quote attributed to M. Ahmadinejad of wanting Iran to wipe Israel off the map isn't accurate and that he was talking about a regime change [Zionist]...This is a very interesting answer (even though Ron Paul was obviously very nervous talking about that), since the only ones talking about that were White Nationalist's (I might be wrong, but I don't think that other politicians or media reported of this obvious misquote) So, the question remains... How was Ron Paul aware of that? If he's aware of that is he also aware that USA is a ZOG empire? And, most importantly, is he listening to Stormfront radio in his closet? 116
A. J. WEBERMAN In spring 2009, the American Council for Judaism’s Issues publication carried an article by Yakov M. Rabkin that defended Iran and bashed Israel. Rabkin wrote this about Ahmadinejad and Holocaust denial: The BBC quoted Ahmadinejad saying, “If European countries claim that they have killed Jews in World War II ... why don’t they provide the Zionist regime with a piece of Europe.” While the “if” is obviously provocative, neither this nor numerous other quotes suggest that his goal is to deny this genocide. Rather, he uses the memory of the mass murder of Jews in Europe to emphasize the plight of the Palestinians and to test the limits of the freedom of speech obtaining in the West. He wonders why, in the name of the freedom of expression, cartoons of Mohammed can be published, while it is against the law in several European countries to question or make fun of the Nazi genocide. The competition of Holocaust cartoons organized in Iran attracted some plainly anti-Semitic works, complete with imagery borrowed from the rich arsenal of European antiSemitic iconography. Some could be considered as revision and even denial of the mass murder of civilians committed in Europe in the early 1940s. This competition caused a furor in many Western countries, which was precisely the point the Iranian president had wanted to make. But he did not deny the Nazi genocide. In his speech, when the Iranian president reportedly first made the remark, the word “map” does not even appear. In fact, he was rehashing one of Ayatollah Khomeini’s decades-old anti-Zionist diatribes: Esrâ’il bâyad az sahneyeh roozégâr mahv shavad, which means “Israel must vanish from the page of time.” After the canard about “wiping Israel off the map” 172
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI circled the world and entered the public mind, some Israeli instigators of the anti-Iran campaign quietly dropped it from further use. A recent report about Iran published by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA), a Zionist think tank particularly active in stirring the anti-Iran campaign, attributes the offensive quote to Khomeini and translates it correctly, insisting, however, that the quote is “genocidal.” The latter term has become a favorite in recent Zionist publications: the same report also refers to “the failed genocidal 1948 war of several Arab states and Palestinians against Israel.” The American Council for Judaism is the group that Ron Paul speaks fondly of because they are traitors to the Jewish people, sick Jews who hate themselves for being Jewish. Why quibble over the translation? During a rare Friday prayer lecture at Tehran University Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, said From now onward, we will support and help any nations, any groups fighting against the Zionist regime across the world, and we are not afraid of declaring this. The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off, and it definitely will be cut off.117 Ron Paul knows that the Shi’ite branch is the brand of Islam is predominant in Iran. He also knows the Shi’ite branch of Islam has been at odds for centuries, often in violent conflict with the Sunnis. There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world and roughly 15% are Shi’ia. Sunnis belong to the Salafiya branch of Islam, which regards Shiites as little better than non-Muslims. For the Salafist-Wahhabists being a Christian or a Jew, people of the book, is far preferable to being Shiite – a rejectionist of the true faith. 117
A. J. WEBERMAN Ron Paul is well aware that the Salafist-Wahhabists Saudis and the Shiâ€™ite Iranians will always be enemies. Since he supports the Iranians he does all he can to discredit the Saudis. On November 29, 2001 in a speech entitled The War on Terrorism Paul made it seem as if the Saudi Royal Family was responsible for 9/11. The predominant nationality of the terrorists was Saudi Arabian. Yet for political and economic reasons, even with the lack of cooperation from the Saudi government, we have ignored that country in placing blame. The Afghan people did nothing to deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is closely tied to bin Laden and al-Qaeda, but so are the Pakistanis and the Saudis.118 In The Case For Defending America January 24, 2002: Could oil be the reason we have concentrated on bombing Afghanistan while ignoring Saudi Arabia, even though we have never found Osama bin Laden? Obviously, Saudi Arabia is culpable in these terrorist attacks on the United States, and yet little is done about it. In reality Bin Laden did all he could to bring down the Saudi monarchy: Ibrahim al-Reemy was a Yemeni closely linked to Osama bin Laden and was the organizer of the attempted bombing of the Saudi Interior Ministry building and the Special Emergency Forces headquarters training unit at Riyadh on December 29, 2005. In the late 1960s, Osama Bin Laden's brother Mahrous bin Laden joined a Salafist-Wahabist sect opposed to the Saudi regime. With his assistance, the dissidents who came to Saudi Arabia from southern Yemen smuggled weapons into Mecca using trucks belonging to the Bin Laden Group and attempted to take over the Al-Masjid al-Haram ("The Holy Mosque") - the holiest mosque in the world and the primary destination of the Hajj pilgrimage. Mahrous bin Laden was arrested, but thanks to the family's connections with 118
. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 162
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI the Saudi king, he was released after the Saudi Security determined he was an unwitting participant. Bakr bin Laden was given a contract to repair the damage that was done to Grand Mosque and soon rebuilt it. Osama Bin Laden aroused so much enmity in the Saudi Government that it put out a contract on him. In a speech entitled A Sad State of Affairs October 25, 2001 Paul argued: Our support for the less-than-ethical government of Saudi Arabia, with our troops occupying what most Muslims consider sacred land, is hardly the way to bring peace to the Middle East. A policy driven by our fear of losing control over the oil fields in the Middle East has not contributed to American Security. Too many powerful special interests drive our policy in this region, and this does little to help us preserve security for Americans here at home. Paul blamed the Jews for the American presence in Saudi Arabia just like he blames the Jews for everything else. Presently he hates Saudi Arabia because according to The Times of London Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defenses to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities. In his speech entitled Statement Opposing Resolution on Iran given on June 19, 2009 he argued: Of course I do not support attempts by foreign governments to suppress the democratic aspirations of their people, but when is the last time we condemned Saudi Arabia or Egypt or the many other countries where unlike in Iran there is no opportunity to exercise any substantial vote on political leadership? It seems our criticism is selective and applied when there are political points to be made. I have admired President Obama’s cautious approach 175
A. J. WEBERMAN to the situation in Iran and I would have preferred that we in the House had acted similarly. That is why I am introducing the “Terror Immigration Elimination Act of 2003.” This bill will deny student and “diversity” visas to anyone coming from a country currently on the State Department’s list of terrorismsponsoring countries. Further, Mr. Speaker, it is time we face reality regarding Saudi Arabia. We must remember that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals. Also, when al-Qaeda supporters were rounded up from Afghanistan and held at Camp XRay, reports showed that of the 158 prisoners more than one hundred were Saudi nationals. With such an evident level of involvement from Saudi nationals in these activities, it is quite obvious that the Saudi government is not doing all it can, or all it should, in resolving this urgent problem. Therefore, Saudi citizens will also be denied student and “diversity” visas to the United States under this bill. Ron Paul believes that the elections in Iran are not rigged by the Revolutionary Guard. The New York Times reported on the 2012 Iranian elections: “Results of the vote have been dismissed as meaningless by many of the opposition supporters who filled the streets during the antigovernment protests set off by the disputed presidential election of 2009. That was followed by a harsh crackdown, lasting months that effectively destroyed the reformist movement and any allied opposition.” Paul was trying to damage relations with the Kingdom by placing its citizens on a terrorist blacklist. In November 2010 Paul again defended Iran and attacked the Saudis in his Texas Straight Talk newsletter:
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI This month the US Administration notified Congress that it intends to complete one of the largest arms sales in US history to one of the most repressive regimes on earth. Saudi Arabia has been given the green light by the administration to spend $60 billion on some 84 new F-15 aircraft, dozens of the latest helicopters, and other missiles, bombs, and high-tech military products from the US weapons industry. We are told that our increasingly aggressive policies toward Iran are justified by that country’s rigid Islamic laws and human-rights violations, while the even more repressive Islamic rule in Saudi Arabia is never mentioned. Paul is far more interested in disarming the Israelis than he is in preventing the Iranians from getting the bomb and the capability to deliver it to Israel. Paul: Today, the Israeli political lobby is a powerful political force. Two to three hundred nuclear weapons, under Israel's control, make Israel more powerful than all the Arab and Muslim countries put together. But that's not where the real power lies. The UN can labor tirelessly in "controlling" one nuclear weapon (in Iran) that doesn't exist while the international community does not put pressure on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In contrast, the world community rarely even admits that Israel's nukes exist—and at the same time Iran has never been ruled in noncompliance with the NPT. The fact that Muslim nations become annoyed with this policy is written off by most in the West by charging antiSemitism.119 119
Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom
A. J. WEBERMAN Paul and Liberty Lobby have both denied being anti-Semitic despite having been accused numerous time of being so. Carto would claim to be only anti-Zionist and even had Jews like Sherman Skolnick, whose parents were Warsaw Ghetto survivors, on the Board of Liberty Lobby. Paul has a few token house Jews who support him. When journalist Jack Anderson wrote the Liberty Lobby was an anti-Semitic neo-Nazi organization Carto went as far as suing Anderson. Liberty Lobby lost this landmark case. Paul doesn’t come out and say “I am against Zionism” but implies this in his books, speeches and Congressional votes. “Zionism” has become a dog whistle word for Jews as in Achmadinajad’s “World Without Zionism” conference. In August 2012 Paul voiced his opposition to sanctions against Iran: I think this bill would be better named if we called it Obsession With Iran Act 2012. Because this is what we continue to be doing is be obsessed with Iran and the idea that Iran is a threat to our national security. Iran happens to be a third world nation they have no significant navy, air force intercontinental ballistic missiles. The IAEA and our CIA said they are not on the verge of a nuclear weapon. It’s so similar to what we went though in the early part of the last decade when we were beating the war drums to go to war against Iraq and it was all a façade; there was no danger from Iraq. So this is what we are doing, beating the war drums once again. Now since the bill has come back from the conference if we’re going to deal with civil liberties in Syria well I happen to be a civil libertarian I am very concerned about civil liberties. But let me tell you this bill is not going to do anything to enhance the civil liberties of the individuals in Syria. Now if we were really interested in civil liberties why wouldn’t we look to ourselves? Why wouldn’t we look to the things we do here. What about our warrantless searches under the Patriot Act? What about the policy of assassination and 178
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI assassinating American citizens? What about arrests by the military the National Defense Authorization Act. What about the drone warfare that we go on do you we are protecting civil liberties by arbitrarily dropping drones anyplace in the world with innocent people dying? If we want to really care about civil liberties in Syria? What do we care about the civil liberties? What about the secret prisons we have and the history of torture in this country. What about the fact that kill lists are being made by the executive branch of government and we sit idly by and approve of it by saying nothing and the American people put up with it and we march in this direction marching into a determination to have another war. When you put on sanctions on a country it’s an act of war and that’s what this is all about. The first thing you do when war breaks out between two countries is you put sanctions on the country, you blockade the country. So this is an act of war. What would we do if somebody blockaded us and put sanctions on us and prevented the importation of any product in this country? We’d be furious; we’d declare war we’d go to war so we are the antagonists. We are over there poking our nose, poking our nose in other people’s affairs just looking for the chance to start another war. First it’s Syria, than Iran we have too many wars we need to stop these wars we don’t have the money to fight these wars any longer. I am still rather impressed with the obsession over a weapon that still does not exist and no concern whatsoever about many nuclear weapons that are held by countries that never even joined the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. It is called for in the debate that Iran should end all its nuclear programs. But they are permitted to have their programs under the Non Proliferation Treaty/ And the other countries that have weapons including the countries that hold the weapons that 179
A. J. WEBERMAN came from the Soviet Union system, it seems that that would be a much greater danger You know the investigation by the UN or by the CIA has never indicated that they never enrich above 20%. And they said they would not even do it to 20% if they would merely allow if the west would cooperate and sell them this material they said we don’t need it. But we need 20% enrichment for nuclear isotopes, medical isotopes. So our refusal to deal with them prompts them to take it up to enrichment to 20%. 5% of course is what they are allowed to do for nuclear energies. But this idea that we can badger people and then defy the law what we are asking them to do is to close down their program is you are asking them to defy international law they agreed to this they have a right to do this under this treaty. For us to say that they must quit it I think it is very close to an obsession on a country that is incapable of attacking us. They don’t have a history of invading their neighboring countries. The last time they were at war was with Iraq and we bugged Iraq to go to go into Iran. So I find this very distressing that the obsession continues. I find it very very upsetting that this vote will of course be overwhelmingly in support of correcting the civil liberties of Syria and making Iran toe the line and give up on something that they are permitted to do. A vote for this in my opinion in time will show that it’s just one more step to another war that we do not need. We have not been provoked. They are not a threat to our national security and we should not be going this. We’ve been doing it to long. For the last 10, 15 years we are just obsessed with idea that we go to war and try to solve all the problems of the world at the same time it is bankrupting us. I strongly urge a no vote on this resolution. 180
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI THE WORST CASE SCENARIO If Paul were elected President and Israel was destroyed by Iran there would be no country for American Jews to seek asylum in. President Paul would whip up Jew hatred in America with conspiracy theories and racism. He would eviscerate or destroy all anti-terrorist laws and let the enemies of America regroup overseas. There would be a devastating chemical, biological or radiological attack which he would have his FBI Director David Duke and CIA Director Michael Scheuer blame on the remnants of the Mossad or on the American Jews. A State of War or State of National Emergency could be declared by President Paul and Jews could be ordered sent to concentration camps. There is precedent for this: Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which permitted the military to suspend the constitutional safeguards of American citizens for the sake of national defense. The order set into motion the exclusion from certain areas, and the evacuation and mass incarceration of 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry living on the West Coast, most of who were U.S. citizens or legal permanent resident aliens.
A. J. WEBERMAN
CHAPTER SIX RON PAUL: AVOWED ENEMY OF ISRAEL
Paul is a crypto-Nazi and pretends he is not anti-Israel: Israel is our close friend. While President Obamaâ€™s demand that Israel make hard concessions in her border conflicts may very well be in her long-term 182
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI interest, only Israel can make that determination on her own, without pressure from the United States or coercion by the United Nations. Unlike this President, I do not believe it is our place to dictate how Israel runs her affairs. There can only be peace in the region if those sides work out their differences among one another. We should respect Israel’s sovereignty and not try to dictate her policy from Washington.120 The bottom line here is that “respect Israel’s sovereignty” means Paul wants the US to totally abandon Israel as an ally and not guarantee its existence as it has done since 1948. Israel is on its own. In a May 24, 1996 Congress Daily article Paul, stating that lobbying groups who seek special favors and handouts are evil, wrote, By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the bad sort is the Israeli government and that the goal of the Zionist movement is to stifle criticism. This does not sound like a friend of Israel to me! On September 7, 2006 in his speech entitled Big-Government Solutions Don’t Work Paul hinted how the Jews controlled American foreign policy in the Middle East: I find it amazing that we in this country seem determined to completely separate religious expression and the state, even to the detriment of the first amendment, yet we can say little about how Christian and Jewish religious beliefs greatly influence our policies in the Middle East? It should be the other way around. Religious expression, according to the First Amendment, cannot be regulated anywhere by Congress or the Federal courts. But deeply held theological beliefs should never dictate our foreign policy. Being falsely 120
A. J. WEBERMAN accused of anti-Semitism and being a supporter of radical fascism is not an enviable position for any politician. Most realize it is best to be quiet and support our Middle East involvement. Paul has to defend himself against charges of anti-Semitism on many occasions. This is because he is an anti-Semite. Paul has the same position on Israel as the Spotlight: The Spotlight is anti-Zionist, a political position mandated by Liberty Lobby's Policy Position No. 5, "Pro American Foreign Policy." This clearly means a policy of nonintervention in foreign affairs. Liberty Lobby sees that most of this nation's problems today result from intervention into foreign wars, none of which have served US interests. Nonintervention is the original policy for America, laid down by our government from the American Revolution to the Spanish-American War. With two exceptions, our glorious victories over Grenada and Haiti, every foreign war has resulted in disaster for this nation and the other belligerents. This policy means handsoff Vietnam, Iraq, Kosovo and the Palestinian no-win mess. It definitely means no more taxpayer's money for Israel. Liberty Lobby's position on this has been consistent for 45 years, and is the reason for Israel's agents, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) attacking and minimizing Liberty Lobby and the Spotlight at every opportunity. To attain its subversive aim of unlimited, perpetual financial gifts for Israel-the most aggressive nation in the world -except perhaps for the USA -- the ADL has made a fetish of putting down Liberty Lobby /The Spotlight.121 More lies are found in an excerpt from The Revolution: A Manifesto, by Ron Paul: 121
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI I see no reason that our friendship with Israel cannot continue. I favor extending to Israel the same honest friendship that Jefferson and the Founding Fathers urged us to offer to all nations. But that also means no special privileges like foreign aid – a position I maintain vis-a-vis all other countries as well. That means I also favor discontinuing foreign aid to governments that are actual or potential enemies of Israel, which taken together receive much more American aid than Israel does. Giving aid to both sides has understandably made many Israelis and American Jews conclude that the American government is hypocritically hedging its bets.122 Paul’s attempt to seem even handed is a smoke screen. The enemies of Israel don’t need the foreign aid as much as Israel does because countries like Saudi Arabia and Iraq have funds from oil revenues. The other recipients of foreign aid like Pakistan and Egypt face minimal if any military threats. American military aid has always given Israel military superiority. If it stops there is no guarantee that Israel can maintain this superiority. Paul is too smart to say, “Let’s cut off aid to Israel.” Then people would see where he is coming from. So he says let’s cut off aid to all countries including Israel which is the largest recipient of it. He has also stated “We should share intelligence for mutually agreed goals. We should honor our pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region.” 123 What does this last sentence mean? That America will not sell arms to Israel’s enemies so the balance of power remains static? What about Israel’s quantitative edge? And who is going to decide if an arms sale undermines this? President Ron Paul? The same Ron Paul who
. http://www.scribd.com/doc/48821100/The-Revolution-A-ManifestoPaul-Ron 123
A. J. WEBERMAN opposed a House resolution condemning terrorism inflicted on Israel: Mr. Farr. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H. Res. 294, condemning the terrorism inflicted on Israel, expressing solidarity with the Israeli people, and calling on the Palestinian Authority to take immediate and effective steps to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure on the West Bank and Gaza. I also rise today to express my solidarity with all those who support the efforts towards peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Mr. Paul. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this measure. Of course we all deplore terrorism and violence that any innocents are forced to suffer. There is, sadly, plenty of this in the world today. But there is more to this resolution than just condemning the violence in the Middle East. I have a problem with most resolutions like this because they have the appearance of taking one side or the other in a conflict that has nothing to do with the United States. Our responsibility is to the American people and to the Constitution, not to adjudicate age-old conflicts half-way around the world. When we take sides in these far off conflicts, we serve to antagonize the people affected and end up no closer to peace than when we started. This bill makes reference to the need to have solidarity with Israel. Elsewhere people say we should have solidarity with the Palestinians and the Arabs. So, as I have said before when bills such as this are on the floor, it is sort of a contest: Should we be pro-Israel or pro-Arab, or anti-Israel or anti- Arab, and how are we perceived in doing this? It is pretty important. But I still believe, through all these bills attempting to intervene in the Middle East, that there is a third option to this that we so often forget 186
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI about. Why can we not be pro-American? What is in the best interests of the United States? We do not hear much talk of that, unfortunately. As I keep saying when votes such as this come to the floor, the best foreign policy for the United States is noninterventionism. It is a policy of American interests first, costs much less money, and is in keeping with a long American tradition so eloquently described by our Founders. I hope the peoples of the Middle East are able to resolve their differences, but because whether they decide or not is not our business I urge a no vote on this resolution.124 “Non-interventionism” in this context means that we should take the side of the Arabs not because it is the morally right thing to do but because it is in America’s best interests. Paul told Congress: Mr. Speaker, this resolution [we are voting on] in several places asserts that the United States is “strongly committed” to the security of Israel. I find no provision in the Constitution that allows the United States Government to confiscate money from its own citizens and send it overseas for the defense of a foreign country. Further, this legislation promises that the United States “remains committed to Israel, including secure, recognized, and defensible borders.” So we are pledging to defend Israel’s borders while we are not even able to control our own borders. Shouldn’t we be concentrating on fulfilling our constitutional obligations in our own country first, before we go crusading around the world to protect foreign borders? I also must object to the one-sidedness of this legislation. Like so many that have come before it, this resolution takes sides in a conflict that has nothing to do with us. Among other things, it affirms Israel as a “Jewish state.” Is it 124
A. J. WEBERMAN really our business to endorse a state church in a foreign country? What message does this send from the United States to Israeli citizens who are not Jewish?125 Paul is consistently on the side of Israel’s enemies when it comes to his voting record in Congress: Statement on H Res 34, Recognizing Israel's right to defend itself against attacks from Gaza, Reaffirming the United States strong support for Israel, and supporting the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Madame Speaker, I strongly oppose H. Res. 34, which was rushed to the floor with almost no prior notice and without consideration by the House Foreign Affairs Committee. The resolution clearly takes one side in a conflict that has nothing to do with the United States or US interests. I am concerned that the weapons currently being used by Israel against the Palestinians in Gaza are made in America and paid for by American taxpayers. What will adopting this resolution do to the perception of the United States in the Muslim and Arab world? What kind of blowback might we see from this? What moral responsibility do we have for the violence in Israel and Gaza after having provided so much military support to one side? Madame Speaker, this resolution will do nothing to reduce the fighting and bloodshed in the Middle East. The resolution in fact will lead the US to become further involved in this conflict, promising “vigorous support and unwavering commitment to the welfare, security, and survival of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.” Is it really in the interest of the United States to guarantee the survival of any foreign 125
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI country? I believe it would be better to focus on the security and survival of the United States, the Constitution of which my colleagues and I swore to defend just this week at the beginning of the 111th Congress. I urge my colleagues to reject this resolution.126 On March 5, 2008 Paul failed to acknowledge the fact that Hamas sent rockets into Israel from Gaza prior to Israel’s retaliation: Madam Speaker: I rise in opposition to H. Res. 951. As one who is consistently against war and violence, I obviously do not support the firing of rockets indiscriminately into civilian populations. I believe it is appalling that Palestinians are firing rockets that harm innocent Israelis, just as I believe it is appalling that Israel fires missiles into Palestinian areas where children and other non-combatants are killed and injured.127 Paul was interviewed by Iranian television about the Israeli retaliation against the Islamists of Gaza: It’s our money and it’s our weapons. But I think we encouraged it. Certainly the president has said nothing to diminish it. As a matter of fact he justifies it on moral grounds…without even mentioning the tragedy of Gaza, you know the real problems that are there. To me I look at it like a concentration camp. People are making homemade bombs – like they’re the aggressors?128 126
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=86&Itemid=60 127
A. J. WEBERMAN In others word if Gaza looks like a concentration camp then that makes the Israelis Nazis. No one is being sent to gas chambers in Gaza. Paul tends to use the word “concentration camp” and Nazi in a way that waters-down its true meaning. For example he told the House “Now we have what I call the ‘Nazification’ of the financial system, not only in America but worldwide. I don’t use that term lightly. As a matter of historic fact, the civil forfeiture laws in this country mirror in many major respects the Nazi forfeiture laws that were used to confiscate the property of the Jews.” Due process still exists in America. Ron Paul had this to during the same interview for Iranian TV: I think if we weren’t in the Middle East there’d be a much greeted motivation for Israel to deal with all the people and maybe the Arab League. Maybe they would be talking to the Arab League every single day and work out problems. But they don’t do that. They don’t have the motivation because they know we’ll back them up. No matter what happens over there, Israel knows and our government knows, Republican or Democrat that we’ll do whatever is necessary to bailout Israel. If Israel has a problem they have to deal with it. I don’t think it should be any of our business. It’s just that it’s our business and we will be blamed because we support Israel blindly so. And we give them the money and we give them the weapons. … If I personally favor one side or the other side then it’s really pretty academic because politically I don’t want to be involved. If I wanna say well, you know, I really think the Palestinians have been ripped off and therefore all the blame is on Israel, then I’ve sorta stepped in a little bit more than I want to. I can have a personal opinion but politically my position is that
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI America would be much better off if we just minded our own business.129 Ron Paul wants to weaken Israel so it has to go begging for mercy to the Arab League. Ron Paul admits is keeping his true opinions about Israel to himself as he knows it would be a political disaster if he expressed them openly. Paulâ€™s ex-confident Eric Rittberg reported, Paul is however, most certainly Anti-Israel and Anti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations. His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs.130 In Liberty Defined Paul claims that the Jews would have trickled into to Israel a little at a time and would have been welcomed with open arms by the Muslims and everything would have been gingerpeachy for the Holocaust survivors but that bad old U.N. messed things up by voting for the establishment of the Jewish State: From the 1890s until 1948, when Israel became a sovereign nation carved out of Palestine, immigration was mostly voluntary, gradual, and accomplished with due respect for existing land titles. Zionism, during the first forty years of this movement, was not about taking land by force nor was it about militarism, A continual peaceful transformation would probably have occurred except for the political actions after World War II in which the United Nations turned a 129
A. J. WEBERMAN local and demographic issue into an international and highly politicized one. Historian Juan Cole has pointed out that Jerusalem (Palestine), through the many centuries, was under Jewish rule for only about 170 years. In other words, there are many competing claims for the same land, and it is impossible to decide between them. Dozens of other regimes occupied the land for much longer periods of time. For instance, Muslims ruled Jerusalem for 1,191 years.131 What Paul is saying is that the Jewish people have no real claim to the land of Israel. He quotes Juan Cole, a well-known professor at the University of Michigan who believes Israel’s Likud Party is comprised of fascist Jews. Cole has made a career out of attacking Israel. Ron Paul sides with the Islamic world against America and blames anti-Americanism on American and Israeli foreign policy. He also blames the British, a favorite target of Nazis due Britain’s role in defeating Adolf Hitler. Paul: The West has been at war with the Muslim world for over a thousand years. In this century, the British led the charge prior to World War II. Since that time it has been the United States. Although the British remain close allies of ours in intimidating the Muslim world, it is the military strength of the United States that assumes the burden of responsibility for the policy. It is justified by claiming a right and need to protect “our” oil. The fear I have is that our policies, along with those of Britain, the UN, and NATO since World War II, inspired and have now awakened a 131
. http://content.yudu.com/Library/A1u7lb/LibertyDefined50Esse/resources/14 5.htm
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI long forgotten sleeping fundamentalism.132
So America and its allies are to blame for the rise of Islam, a religion and political system Paul sees as a potential ally against Israel and the Jews. That is why Ron Paul supported the construction of a mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero: Is the controversy over building a mosque near ground zero a grand distraction or a grand opportunity? Or is it once again grandiose demagoguery? It has been said, “Nero fiddled while Rome burned.” Are we not overly preoccupied with this controversy, now being used in various ways by grandstanding politicians? It looks to me like the politicians are fiddling while the economy burns. The debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque. Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be “sensitive” requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from “ground zero.” Just think of what might (not) have happened if the whole issue had been ignored and the national debate stuck with war, peace, and prosperity. There certainly would have been a lot less emotionalism on both sides. The fact that so much attention has been given the mosque debate, raises the question of just why and driven by whom?
A. J. WEBERMAN In my opinion it has come from the neoconservatives who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia and are compelled to constantly justify it. They never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the illconceived preventative wars. A select quote from soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq expressing concern over the mosque is pure propaganda and an affront to their bravery and sacrifice. The claim is that we are in the Middle East to protect our liberties is misleading. To continue this charade, millions of Muslims are indicted and we are obligated to rescue them from their religious and political leaders. And, we're supposed to believe that abusing our liberties at home and pursuing unconstitutional wars overseas will solve our problems. The nineteen suicide bombers didn't come from Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iran. Fifteen came from our ally Saudi Arabia, a country that harbors strong American resentment, yet we invade and occupy Iraq where no al Qaeda existed prior to 9/11.133 So it is the neo-conservatives (code word for Jews) who oppose it and not the Christian evangelical clergy and families of those killed on 9/11. Paul had more to say in favor of the Ground Zero Mosque: Many fellow conservatives say they understand the property rights and 1st Amendment issues and don't want a legal ban on building the mosque. They just want everybody to be â€œsensitiveâ€? and force, through public pressure, cancellation of the mosque construction. This sentiment seems to confirm that Islam itself is to be made the issue, and radical 133
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI religious Islamic views were the only reasons for 9/11. If it became known that 9/11 resulted in part from a desire to retaliate against what many Muslims saw as American aggression and occupation, the need to demonize Islam would be difficult if not impossible. There is no doubt that a small portion of radical, angry Islamists do want to kill us but the question remains, what exactly motivates this hatred? If Islam is further discredited by making the building of the mosque the issue, then the false justification for our wars in the Middle East will continue to be acceptable. The justification to ban the mosque is no more rational than banning a soccer field in the same place because all the suicide bombers loved to play soccer. Conservatives are once again, unfortunately, failing to defend private property rights, a policy we claim to cherish. In addition conservatives missed a chance to challenge the hypocrisy of the left which now claims they defend property rights of Muslims, yet rarely if ever, the property rights of American private businesses. Defending the controversial use of property should be no more difficult than defending the 1st Amendment principle of defending controversial speech. But many conservatives and liberals do not want to diminish the hatred for Islam â€” the driving emotion that keeps us in the wars in the Middle East and Central Asia. It is repeatedly said that 64% of the people, after listening to the political demagogues, don't want the mosque to be built. What would we do if 75% of the people insist that no more Catholic churches be built in New York City? The point being is that majorities 195
A. J. WEBERMAN can become oppressors of minority rights as well as individual dictators. Statistics of support is irrelevant when it comes to the purpose of government in a free society — protecting liberty. The outcry over the building of the mosque, near ground zero, implies that Islam alone was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. According to those who are condemning the building of the mosque, the nineteen suicide terrorists on 9/11 spoke for all Muslims. This is like blaming all Christians for the wars of aggression and occupation because some Christians supported neo-conservatives aggressive wars. The House Speaker is now treading on a slippery slope by demanding an investigation to find out just who is funding the mosque — a bold rejection of property rights, 1st Amendment rights, and the Rule of Law — in order to look tough against Islam. This is all about hate and Islamaphobia. We now have an epidemic of “sunshine patriots” on both the right and the left who are all for freedom, as long as there's no controversy and nobody is offended. Political demagoguery rules when truth and liberty are ignored.134 Paul’s son, Senator Rand Paul opposed the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero: While this is a local matter that will be decided by the people of New York, I do not support a mosque being built two blocks from Ground Zero. In my opinion, the Muslim community would better serve the healing process by making a donation to the memorial fund for the victims of September 11th. 134
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Rand Paul is not Ron Paul: Sen. Rand Paul took what very well could be considered his most pro-Israel stance yet, saying in an interview that an attack on Israel should be treated as an attack on the United States. Asked in an interview whether the United States would stand with Israel and provide it foreign aid if the Jewish state was attacked by its enemies, Paul went a step further and said such an attack should be treated as an attack on the U.S. 'Well absolutely we stand with Israel,' he said in an interview with Breitbart News, 'but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think it is pretty well known --- that any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States.'” On the other hand in a speech before the Heritage Foundation Rand Paul seemed to favor containment of Iran as opposed to taking out their bomb factories. Is he going to wait until after Israel is attacked with nuclear weapons then attack Iran? Rand Paul is a walking contradiction and that makes him dangerous. Because Ron Paul sees the Islamists as an ally in the war against the Jews, he has stated the he opposes religious profiling at America’s airports. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) the American arm of Hamas, thanked Ron Paul for having rejected profiling during CNN’s Republican debate, and directed their ire at another presidential candidate, Rick Santorum. During the debate, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer noted that Santorum had advocated profiling in the past. “Just to be precise, is it ethnic profiling, religious profiling, who would be profiled?” Blitzer asked. “The folks that are most likely to be committing these crimes,” Santorum replied. “Obviously Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely.” “That’s digging our hole for ourselves,” Paul disagreed. “What if they look like [Oklahoma City bomber] Timothy McVeigh?” This was not the only issue that Paul and CAIR agreed upon. A CAIR press release read: As we have stated repeatedly in the past, the American Muslim community firmly repudiated Anwar al-Awlaki’s incitement to violence, which occurred after he left the United States. While a voice of hate 197
A. J. WEBERMAN has been eliminated, we urge our nation’s leaders to address the constitutional issues raised by the assassination of American citizens without due process of law. Ron Paul stated: No I don’t think that’s a good way to deal with our problems. He was born here, Al-Awlaki was born here, he is an American citizen. He was never tried or charged for any crimes. No one knows if he killed anybody. We know he might have been associated with the underwear bomber. But if the American people accept this blindly and casually that we now have an accepted practice of the president assassinating people who he thinks are bad guys, I think it’s sad.135 How else could have Paul defended the Imam who inspired so much violence in the United States including the Fort Hood massacre of unarmed soldiers by one of Al-Awlaki’s followers? How many American soldiers would have had to die in an attempt to bring Al-Awlaki back to the United States? Paul is in league with Michael Scheuer another Jew-hater. It wasn’t until 1996 that the FBI recognized the increased threat to the United States posed by Osama Bin Laden and created the Osama Bin Laden Unit to handle alQaeda-related matters. From 1996 to 1999, the Osama Bin Laden tracking unit was at the Counterterrorist Center. Post-9/11 it was run by Michael Scheuer. Sheuer attended Canisius College. U.S. News and World Report ranked Canisius as 22nd among regional schools in its "North Region." He went on to earn an M.A. from Niagara University 135
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI in 1976 and another M.A. from Carleton University in 1982. He also received a Ph.D. in British Empire-U.S.-Canada-U.K. relations from the University of Manitoba in 1986. He was never the brightest light on the Christmas. Scheuer was an Islamist ideological mole within the CIA and a truly dangerous enemy of the United States. Scheuer pretended to go after Osama Bin Laden but was in reality was protecting him. In order to hide this Sheuer blamed the Clinton Administration for CIA’s failure to kill Bin Laden, claiming that he had the chance to do it numerous times but was prevented from doing so by his superiors. He offered no evidence to back up these claims other than his self serving statements based on his apparent bona fides while in the CIA: Scheuer was in charge of the rendition program and was responsible for numerous kidnappings, imprisonment and torture of 30 lower level Islamists. This researcher believes he carried out these operations successfully in order to maintain his credibility so he could protect the big enchilada, Osama Bin Laden. Scheuer knew that if Bin Laden remained on the loose, he would soon carry out an operation against the United States that would make the other jihadist terrorist acts look like greasy kids stuff. Scheuer never made clandestine contact with Al-Qaeda so the CIA Counter Intelligence Section or Office of Security had no reason to suspect him. In retrospect if Sheuer held the same views while he headed the Bin Laden Desk that he expressed after he left it, then there is no other explanation other than that he was an enemy ideological mole. In his book Imperial Hubris Scheuer called Bin Laden a “great man” and Bin Laden spoke highly of Scheuer in a video Al Qaeda released136 and said, "If you want to understand what's going on and if you would like to get to know some of the reasons for you’re losing the war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer in this regard." Additionally Scheuer claimed that repressive governments like Algeria, Egypt and especially Saudi Arabia are responsible for the resurgence of Islamic jihadist fundamentalism in the Moslem 136
A. J. WEBERMAN world and he said that he wanted to see these governments overthrown. He already got his wish in Egypt which will soon be transformed into an Islamic dictatorship by the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Shahab as they have been voted into office. Scheuer blamed everything on Israel. Even if there was no Israel these Islamists would still be intent on establishing a Caliphate and making the entire world Islamic, starting with the Jews, who Mohammed failed to convert. But Scheuer argues that it is not religious or cultural differences that have made Islam regard America as the enemy. It is solely the result of America’s support for the State of Israel. Scheuer wants the Islamic world to focus its hatred on Israel rather than the United States. Other CIA and FBI agents may have screwed up when it came to 9/11 but their failure was unintentional while Scheuer’s was deliberate! He was transferred out of the UBL Unit in 1999 and he resigned from the CIA in 2004.137 After he left the Agency he became an Adjunct Professor of Security Studies at Georgetown University, and was a regular contributor to the Jamestown Foundations Terrorism Focus until he was fired in 2009. In 2009, Scheuer reported that he had lost his position as a Senior Fellow with the Jamestown Foundation, after "several major financial donors to Jamestown threatened to withdraw funding" if he continued in that role. The funding threats were pursuant to his criticism of Barack Obama's "dancing the Tel Aviv two-step" in allegedly kowtowing to the Israeli lobby, as well as Scheuer's disdaining of Obama's selection as Chief of Staff of Rahm Emmanuel, who he called "a U.S. citizen who during the 1991 Gulf War left America to serve in Israel's military.” Scheuer has stated, “Israel is not only an unnecessary and self-made liability for the United States, it is an untreated and spreading cancer on our domestic politics, foreign policy, and national security.” Scheuer published two books blaming others for his failure to kidnap or 137
. Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 – by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 200
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI murder Usama Bin Laden. It was Scheuer who trained the CIA Station Chief in Khost who let a triple agent wreak havoc on the CIA. Scheuer stated: Dr. Paul’s non-interventionist policy will allow foreigners to work out their political destiny in their own way and at their own pace; prevent unnecessary additions to America’s growing list of enemies; and save countless young lives. Electing anyone but Ron Paul will further increase the already strong chances of widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside the United States. Ron Paul stated: The pharmaceutical plant in Sudan was just that, a pharmaceutical plant, owned by a Muslim businessman who was standing up to the Islamic fundamentalists, the same people we pretend to oppose and use as scapegoats for all our MiddleEastern policies. And now we have the controversial and unconstitutional waging of war in Iraq.138 The only known use of EMPTA is as a precursor to Vx a deadly nerve gas; it has no uses in pharmaceuticals. It is not made accidentally as a by-product of legitimate pharmaceutical manufacturing. A soil sample was taken from the grounds around the Al-Shifa “Pharmaceutical Plant” in the Sudan and EMPTA was discovered. According to former CIA Director George Tenet, the CIA sent a human agent to Al-Shifa who entered the facility grounds, evaded plant guards, and collected the soil sample from a designated area within the gates of the plant. 139 He said that a U.S. 138
. Tim Weiner and Steven Lee Myers “U.S. Notes Gaps in Data about Drug Plant But Defends Attack; Sudan Envoy Angry” The New York Times, September 3, 1998. Former Shifa export manager Alamaddin al-Shibli denied that the soil sample could have been taken from Shifa saying, “the
A. J. WEBERMAN commercial laboratory analyzed the sample and found a level 2.5 times that necessary to be considered a trace presence of EMPTA. Tenet said the operative had submitted to repeated polygraph tests to gain assurance that the informant had carried out the mission as instructed. But of course Ron Paul has better intelligence than the CIA: Paul continued to defend Islamist terrorists by denying that jihad is a pillar of Islam. Robert Pape, author of Dying to Win, explains the strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Pape has collected a database of every suicide terrorist attack between 1980 and 2004, all 462 of them. His conclusions are enlightening and crucial to our understanding the true motivation behind the attacks against Western nations by Islamic terrorists. After his exhaustive study, Pape comes to some very important conclusions. I, like many, have assumed that the driving force behind the suicide attacks was Islamic fundamentalism. Promise of instant entry into paradise as a reward for killing infidels seemed to explain the suicides, a concept that is foreign to our way of thinking. The world’s expert on suicide terrorism has convinced me to rethink this simplistic explanation, that terrorism is merely an expression of religious extremism and resentment of a foreign culture.140 University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape argued that Islam has little to do with suicide bombing. Rather, he suggested, factory was tiled throughout, and there was asphalt everywhere outside the buildings. Where could anyone have taken a sample?” See Dahne, “Owner of Sudanese Factory Comes Under Scrutiny.” http://www.vitrade.com/who_is_who/idris/980923_idris_dpa.htm 140
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI that suicide bombers, wherever they are in the world, were motivated much more by tactical goals. He juxtaposed the suicide terrorism of the (non-Islamic) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam with Islamist suicide bombing to demonstrate that a desire to end occupation is the common factor rather than religion. Therefore, he suggested that focus upon religion is a distraction and that policymakers seeking to stop the scourge of suicide attacks should work instead to address root causes, which he sees as the presence of troops or interests in disputed or occupied lands. This is just another way of convincing Americans that if they abandoned Israel the threat of terrorism would subside. The fact remains that most suicide bombings since 1980 in the world in general and in the Middle East in particular are sponsored by Islamist and not secular terrorist groups. Pape avoids this conclusion by gerrymandering his data so that he does not need to include the significant numbers of suicide bombings conducted by Sunnis against Shiâ€˜a in Iraq. The following is from a speech by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad of Malaysia to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003: There is a feeling of hopelessness among the Muslim countries and their people. They feel that they can do nothing right. They believe that things can only get worse. The Muslims will forever be oppressed and dominated by the Europeans and the Jews. It cannot be that there is no other way. 1.3 billion Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews. There must be a way. And we can only find a way if we stop to think, to assess our weaknesses and our strength, to plan, to strategize and then to counter attack. We are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be simply wiped out. The Europeans killed 6 million Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them. 203
A. J. WEBERMAN The enemy will probably welcome these proposals and we will conclude that the promoters are working for the enemy. But think. We are up against a people who think. They survived 2000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking. They invented and successfully promoted Socialism, Communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have now gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power. We cannot fight them through brawn alone. We must use our brains also. Of late because of their power and their apparent success they have become arrogant. And arrogant people, like angry people will make mistakes, will forget to think. This is from a speech Paul gave to entitled Congress on October 28, 2003 entitled Shouldn’t Censor Foreign Leaders: A careful reading of the prime minister’s speech did not find any explicit calls for violence. Actually, Dr. Mahathir called for Muslims around the world to cease using violence to seek their goals. He stated, “Is there no other way than to ask our young people to blow themselves up and kill people and invite the massacre of more of our own people?” Also, he advises against “revenge” attacks and urges Muslims to “win [the] hearts and minds” of non-Muslims including “Jews...who do not approve of what the Israelis are doing.” While we may agree or disagree with the cause that Dr. Mahathir espouses, the fact that he calls for non-violent means to achieve his goals is to be commended rather than condemned. This is not to agree with every aspect of his address 204
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI — and certainly not to agree with some of the ridiculous statements contained therein — but rather to caution against the kind of blanket condemnation that this legislation represents. Do we not also agree with his words that Muslim violence in the Middle East has been counterproductive? President Bush himself in May invited Dr. Mahathir to the White House to, in the president’s words, “publicly thank the Prime Minister for his strong support in the war against terror.”141 RON PAUL REACTS TO THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM ABOUT ISRAEL IN THIS BOOK Ron Paul was sent a copy of this book at his office, Campaign Committee and PAC. A few weeks later he released a statement that shocked his constituency. Business insider142 reported that when asked about Israel moving its capitol from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem Paul told evangelical leaders: The real issue here is not what America wants, but what does Israel want? If Israel wants their capital to be Jerusalem, then the United States should honor that. How would we like it if some other nation said 'We decided to recognize New York City as your capital instead, so we will build our embassy there?’ Paul was reacting to this book and to the formation of an organization known as JAP – Jews Against Paul. He is a devious, duplicitous weasel and he released this statement so people would think “How could Paul be a Nazi when he favored a position of 141
A. J. WEBERMAN this nature?” A smart move on Paul’s part designed to neutralize any effect this expose might have. Throughout this expose I never once do I say that Ron Paul is dumb, however I do say that his followers who don’t pick up on the dog whistle language and actually believe this man stands for liberty are dumb brainwashed zombies. As for his overt and covert Nazi followers, the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER SEVEN DOMESTIC TERRORISM SECURITY STRIPPING AMERICA
We need no more Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act! No more Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Acts! No more torture! No more Military Commissions Act! No more secret prisons and extraordinary rendition! No more abuse of habeas corpus! No more PATRIOT Acts! What we need is more government transparency and more privacy for the individual! (Ron Paul March 13, 2008)
Paul wrote this in his Texas Straight Talk Newsletter: Some, even conservatives, have offered the example of President Franklin Roosevelt's use of a military court to try a group of Nazi saboteurs during World War II. It is curious to see FDR as a model for
A. J. WEBERMAN conservatives, but nevertheless we were in a declared war and those captured were agents of a country with which we were in an active state of war. We are not currently in a state of war, despite what pundits might claim.143 For Ron Paul the war between America and Islamist terrorists does not exist so it is no surprise that he was one of the three Republican members of Congress who voted against the PATRIOT Act. When the PATRIOT Act was passed, it was in the passions following 9/11, and that bill should have never been passed. It was brought up carelessly, casually, in a rapid manner. The bill that had been discussed in the Committee on the Judiciary was removed during the night before we voted. The full text of this bill was very difficult to find. I am convinced that very few Members were able to review this bill before voting. That bill should have never passed. We certainly should continue to maintain the sunset provisions. But that is a long way off, and we should be starting to reform and improve this particular piece of legislation. This is our first chance to do so. Demanding domestic security in times of war invites carelessness in preserving civil liberties and the right of privacy. Frequently the people are only too anxious for their freedoms to be sacrificed on the altar of authoritarianism thought to be necessary to remain safe and secure. Nothing would please the terrorists more than if we willingly give up some of our cherished liberties while defending ourselves from their threat. Many of the questionable provisions in this bill, such as the expanded pen register 143
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI authority and the expanded use of roving wiretaps, are items for which law enforcement has been lobbying for years. The utility of these items in catching terrorists is questionable to say the least. After all, terrorists have demonstrated they are smart enough not to reveal information about their plans when they know federal agents could be listening.144 How does Paul know what would please the terrorists more? Do you think that terrorists are happy about laws that make it more difficult for them to operate? Paul introduced an amendment to weaken the “sneak and peek” provision and had 300 members of Congress vote and was able to eviscerate that clause. “Sneak and Peak” means to execute search warrants without immediately informing their targets. Thanks to the PATRIOT Act "Sneak-andpeek" searches are now easier to get, legal in all jurisdictions, and the law contains no practical limit on how long authorities can delay notifying the subject of a search. But contrary to the impression left by Ron Paul, they aren't new: some federal courts allowed them prior to the USA PATRIOT Act. Paul: The irony is that PATRIOT Act-type regulations were all proposed before 9-11, and are now becoming a costly burden to American businesses. I’m getting more calls every day from constituents who are being harassed by government bureaucrats for “infractions” of all kinds totally unrelated to national security. This immeasurable cost from the stepped-up activity of government bureaucrats will further burden our economy as it slips toward recession — and do little to enhance homeland security.145 Paul was just following the anti-terrorist legislation Nazi Party line as put forth by Willis Carto: 144
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=386&Itemid=60 145
A. J. WEBERMAN The SPOTLIGHT March 27, 1995 ANTI-TERRORISM BILL WOULD ERODE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS There's a move on in Congress to further erode Constitutional rights and protections in the name of "anti-terrorism." Under the guise of combating terrorism, a bill has been introduced in both the House and Senate that presents further infringements on the rights of Americans as guaranteed by the Constitution. Officially called the Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, the Senate version of the bill, S. 390, has been introduced by Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Sen. Arlen Specter (R.-Pa.). The House version, H.R. 896, has been introduced by Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). The bill, which was initiated by the FBI, appears to have bipartisan support, which could expedite action to get it to the floor of both houses of Congress for a vote. While it is a federal crime under current law for Americans to contribute funds for terrorist actions anywhere in the world, the new act would broaden such crime to a point where it would even be unlawful to donate money for peaceful activities, including contributions to the operation of a hospital, to a group that has also been accused of committing "terrorist acts." Under a provision of the bill the president has the power to designate any group as sponsoring terrorism, which would than make it a crime to donate money to the group for even lawful - even humanitarian - objectives. The act would impose guilt by association. Permanent resident aliens who support a group listed by the president as having conducted a terrorist act could be classified as "alien 210
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI terrorists" and be subject to deportation. Special courts would be convened, before which the government could appear and show probable cause that an alien has supported terrorism by simply being associated in some obscure manner with either a group listed as terrorist or any of its members. The court could then order deportation based on secret evidence that would not even be made available to the defendant's attorney. The act could provide a general charter for the FBI and other federal agencies, including the military, to investigate political groups and causes at will. It is a wide ranging federalization of different kinds of actions applying to both citizens and non-citizens. It would allow up to 10-year sentences for citizens who are found guilty by association and deportation of resident aliens. While many provisions of the act could ultimately be found unconstitutional after years of litigation, the damage could be enormous to the Constitution in the meantime. The First Amendment, guaranteeing freedom of speech and of the press, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty and the right to bail, are deemed most at risk. It seems as if Paul is defending freedom of resident aliens against the power of an evil dictatorship doesn’t it? How else could he phrase it? “I feel that resident alien terrorists deserve more rights so they can get the job done? They deserve freedom! That is, freedom from FBI scrutiny.” Freedom? If America would have sided with the Nazi during World War II as Paul wished, the Gestapo, the greatest abusers of individual freedom to ever crawl out from under a rock on the planet earth, would have replaced the FBI. The Nazi secret police tortured and terrorized Jews, gays, Communists and all who opposed them. They sent people to death camps without due process of law and habeas corpus. Paul doesn’t care about freedom. Paul wants to hamstring the FBI, CIA and NSA by not passing any new anti-terrorist laws and repealing the laws that have 211
A. J. WEBERMAN prevented Islamists from launching another devastating attack like 9/11. Why would Paul want to see Americans dead? Paul knows that Jews and Israelis would be the prime targets of Islamic terrorists. New York City is where they are most likely to strike. If non-Jews were hurt Paul would only consider it collateral damage. And there are other advantages to be gained by Nazis from a terrorist strike: If a devastating terrorist attack occurs in America Paul and his followers could always blame it on “an Israeli false flag operation” or one perpetrated by the US Government to pass more anti-terrorist legislation or bring us to war. You think this is farfetched? This is from a Ron Paul newsletter: The Middle East, in the last forty years, has soaked up billions of dollars in the name of American security and peace. The more we give Israel, the more we must give their Arab enemies. The height of this folly was vividly and tragically dramatized on October 23, 1981, with the killing of the 241 Marines in Beirut when their barracks were destroyed by radical Moslems. The terrorists probably were aided by Iran and supplied with explosives sold to them by Israel, originating from the United States and paid for by American taxpayers. Paul claimed that his votes are in line with the wishes to the founding fathers. Would the founding fathers characterize the American Government as a bunch of psychopaths willing to murder members of their own armed forces in Beirut by indirectly supplying them with explosives? This propaganda is designed to put people in a frame of mind where any terrorist attack can be blamed on anybody despite the absence of facts. It is part of a hidden agenda to allow a terrorist incident or incidents to occur here and then blame them on America’s relationship with Israel or on the Mossad without any supporting evidence. What all this boils down to is that Paul regards the Federal Government as ZOG – the Zionist Occupational Government and 212
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI wants to limit its power then destroy it by hamstringing or dissolving the FBI, CIA etc. He hopes to do this by promulgating the idea that it is not worth giving up certain civil liberties in exchange for keeping Islamic terrorism out of the United States. He is interested in civil liberties only to security strip America because he wants to empower Jew-hating Islamic terrorists so they can strike America again and drive a wedge between Israel and the war-weary United States. 9/11: AN INSIDE JOB Paul believes in all sorts of screwball conspiracy theories such as the military is involved in a conspiracy against America as is the CIA. In a March 2009 interview, Paul entertained the bogus conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’s claim that NORTHCOM, the U.S. military’s combatant command for North America, is “taking over” the country. “The average member of Congress probably isn’t a participant in the grand conspiracy,” 146 Paul reassured the fevered host, essentially acknowledging that such a conspiracy exists. “We need to take out the CIA.” In a January 2010 speech, Paul announced, “There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup” against the American government. “They’re in businesses, in drug businesses,” the congressman added.147 Eric Rittberg wrote that that Paul is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist: He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that the Bush administration might have known about the attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting promilitary statements in support of the Bush administration. 146
. http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/cracker-barrel-orcrackpot/2011/12/28/0/?print 147
A. J. WEBERMAN Ron Paul has repeatedly denied that he believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories, but in an interview in October 2011, he was asked why he wouldn’t talk about the “truth” behind 9/11. He responded that he “just can’t handle the controversy.” A group called Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth asked Paul whether he believed the official investigation into the September 11 th attacks was credible. “I never automatically trust anything the government does when they do an investigation,” Paul replied, “because too often I think there’s an area that the government covered up, whether it’s the Kennedy assassination or whatever.” Ahmadinejad is the world’s most infamous 9/11 revisionist. In his September 22, 2011 UN Speech last year he stated, When the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11 incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States. Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers? Very interesting: if Osama Bin Laden had been brought to justice in the United States he might have revealed that he was in league with the United States or the Israelis. This makes no sense and is the ranting of a madman who could soon possess nuclear weapons. On August 7, 2010 he stated:
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI No Jews were killed in the World Trade Center, because one day earlier they were told not to go to their workplace. They announced that 3,000 people were killed in this incident, but there were no reports that reveal their names. Maybe you saw that, but I did not. What was the story of September 11? During five to six days, and with the aid of the media, they created and prepared public opinion so that everyone considered an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq as (their) right. Revisionism concerning World Trade Center bombings is nothing new for Ron Paul. Shortly after the Brooklyn-Jersey City cell of Gamma Al Islamiyya perpetrated the first World Trade Center bombing this appeared in the Ron Paul Survival Newsletter. The New York Bombing It was only a few days after the World Trade Center bombing before Mohammed A. Salameh was arrested. Is he guilty? Who knows? Some people think this is a frame-up by anti-Arab interests. Recall that shortly after the Kennedy assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald was apprehended and accusations were made. We’re still sorting that one out. From my point of view, it’s hard to believe the perpetrators could be as stupid as the authorities maintain. We now know what one homemade bomb can do to a large city – one billion dollars of damage. Whether it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little. The cities have become centers of violence, whether through the daily and routine terrorism of crime, political bomb terrorism, or the terrorism of mob behavior as in Los Angeles. 215
A. J. WEBERMAN The leader of the Ron Paul Super PAC, its founder, chairman and treasurer, is Gary Franchi, a promoter of 9/11 revisionist conspiracy theories. As with many other so-called "independent" Super PACs, which can receive unlimited donations outside the normal rules of campaign finance, the pro-Paul group is operated by people with close ties to the candidate. The group's advisory board members include Penny Langford Freeman, Paul's political director from 1998 to 2007, and Joe Becker, chief legal counsel for Ron Paul 2008. Franchi has supported the 9/11 Truth Movement, which supports the idea that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, were an inside job to create a pretext for a reduction in American liberty with the World Trade Center brought down by a planned U.S. controlled internal demolition, instead of terrorist-controlled airplanes. Franchi founded the Lone Lantern Society (a reference to Paul Revere indicating that foreign enemies are on American soil). The group supports "the birth of freedom and the death of the New World Order," a secretive elite that is supposedly trying to set up a world government. Lone Lantern has held street demonstrations on the 11th of every month in Chicago and elsewhere, demanding an investigation of 9/11. In New Hampshire in 2008, a video shows Franchi asking Tom Ridge, the former secretary of Homeland Security, who was campaigning for Senator John McCain, whether Ridge would support an investigation of the "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Center. Ridge was having none of it, saying, "I just don't buy into that. That's a conspiracy theory that has no basis in fact. It's almost out of the Twilight Zone." According to a 2010 report by the Southern Poverty Law Center, "Gary Franchi is one of the leading promoters of a resurgent Patriot conspiracy theory that alleges the government is creating concentration camps for U.S. citizens." In 2009 he co-wrote and coproduced the video Camp FEMA: American Lockdown, which claims that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is creating concentration camps on air bases and in vacant buildings to house political dissenters when the federal government proclaims martial 216
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI law. "Your church may have already signed a deal with the devil," reads promotional material for the film. The film questions whether Census data will be used to round up Americans. Clips from Franchi's film on YouTube show Hitler youth marching while the narrator ominously describes President Obama's plans to expand AmeriCorps and the USA Freedom Corps, the volunteer initiative launched by the Bush administration after 9/11. In a videotaped interview with delusionary conspiracy talk show host Alex Jones, Franchi explained that at 17 he began to read about "the committee of 300, the Club of Rome, the Council of Foreign Relations," and other groups of the New World Order. He said his parents, thinking he was mentally ill, had him heavily medicated for 10 years. But he continued his reading, particularly about the implantation of RFID microchips by government, and formed the Lone Lantern Society to tell people that "the enemies are here." "It's the truth, it's the message, that's piercing the darkness," Franchi told Jones. "Anything that's done in darkness, anything that is hidden in secret will be revealed. It's having an impact. People are waking up by the millions, Alex, by the millions! The New World Order does not stand a chance."148 This is from Ahmadinejadâ€™s UN Speech 2011 to the United Nations: Who used the mysterious September 11th incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources? By using their imperialistic media network which is under the influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who 148
. http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/09/10358155super-pac-supporting-ron-paul-is-operated-by-a-911-truther? threadId=3341528&commentId=62320690#c62320690
A. J. WEBERMAN questions the Holocaust and the September 11th event with sanctions and military action. Last year, when the need to form a fact-finding team to undertake a thorough investigation concerning the hidden elements involved in September 11th incident was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all independent governments and nations as well as by the majority in the United States, my country and myself came under pressure and threat by the government of the United States. Instead of assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would it not have been reasonable to bring to justice and openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the incident in order to identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers? Why should it not have been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize those who launched terrorist groups and brought wars and other miseries into the region? Is there any classified information that must be kept secret? According to the Iranian Hitler the reason his country is threatened is not because it is trying to develop an atomic bomb to use to destroy Israel but because he is questioning the Holocaust and September 11th. Osama Bin Laden was killed so that he would not "identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?" Who could have provided that "safe airspace?" Could it have been the Israelis, could it have been the Jews or was it Lady Gaga? If this psychopath gets a-hold of nukes he is crazy enough to use them. Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations. 218
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI This is pure Lyndon LaRouche, the failed Hitler. When you see the LaRouchoids in the street they have signs saying REVIVE BRETON WOODS AGREEMENT. The Iranian Hitler got this from the failed American Hitler. What is the justification for the presence of hundreds of US military and intelligence bases in different parts of the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the United Kingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this mean anything other than military occupation? This is pure Ron Paul, the favorite candidate of the Nazis. The crypto-Nazi that wants cut off all aid to Israel. JDO has been on to Paul for decades as he was a populist hero in the Nazi newspaper, The Spotlight. He is a very clever weasel cloaking his Jew hating in isolationism just as the American Firsters did. More from the same speech: I WANT MY MAHDI! A future that will be built when humanity initiates to trend the path of the divine prophets and the righteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, the Ultimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to all divine messengers and leaders and to the pure generation of our great Prophet. The creation of a supreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfect human being, who is a true and sincere lover of all human beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah. He will come...to lead the freedom and justice lovers to eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promote knowledge, peace, justice freedom and love across the world. He will present to every single individual all the beauties of the world and all good things which bring happiness for humankind.
A. J. WEBERMAN If the tradition of the Mahdi was authentic, then there would have been some mention of it in the Qur'an. On the contrary, even the word mahdi does not appear in that book! The original legend about the messianic Imam was adopted by the Shi'is from other religious communities, to which they added their own details until it reached its present form. Islam needed a messianic figure such as the other two major religions had so they came up with the story that an imam disappeared then underwent “a minor occultation”, that is he came halfway back using Imam’s as cutouts, then he went into a major occultation which he will remain in until he returns and sets everything straight - meaning everyone adopts shi'i Islam including the Sunnis. “Occult” can mean “to hide or become hidden or shut off from view” but it can also mean “of or characteristic of magical, mystical, or supernatural arts, phenomena, or influences” often connected with Devil worship. Now the key word here is magical. Magic is unconditionally & absolutely haram / prohibited. It is a gunahane kabira (greater sin) leading to Hell fire. A person who indulges in magic & does not repent is punishable by Death in an Islamic society, as it is equivalent to shirk & severely criticized in many many a hadith "Keep away from the seven destructive sins!" They said, "What are they, O Messenger of Allah?" He answered, "Associating partners with Allah; practicing sorcery; taking a life, which Allah has made forbidden except for a just cause (according to Islamic Law); eating Riba (usury) eating up an orphan's wealth; fleeing from the battle field at the time of fighting (with the unbelievers); and accusing chaste women, who never think of anything that can touch their chastity and who are good believers, of fornication. So what we have in Shia is a reversion to pre-Islamic times known as the time of the jinn.
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In September 2004 Paul voted against a commemoration of 9/11: Mr. Speaker, I am forced to rise in opposition to this legislation, I do so despite my desire to commemorate the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001 and again express my sympathy to the families of the victims. But donâ€™t be fooled by the label. This legislation is no mere commemoration of the events of September 11, 2001. Rather, it is page after page of Congressional self-congratulation. It is page after page of praise for policies that have made us no safer from terrorist attack, but that have certainly made us much less free at home. Does it not strike anyone else as a bit unseemly for Congress to be congratulating itself on this solemn occasion? What this legislation does not do is address some of the real causes of the hatred that lead others to wish to harm us. Why should we bother to understand the motivations of madmen and murderers? It is not to sympathize with them or their cause. It is to ensure our self-preservation. Those who oppose us and who have attacked us have made it very clear: They oppose our foreign policy of interventionism and meddling, and they oppose our one-sided approach to the Middle East. Therefore, mitigating the anger against us could be as simple as returning to the foreign policy recommended by our forefathers. We should not be stationing hundreds of thousands of our troops in more than 100 foreign countries, guarding their borders while our own remain open to terrorist infiltration. We should not be meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries, nor should we be involving ourselves in foreign conflicts that have nothing to do with the United States. We should not be sending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars 221
A. J. WEBERMAN overseas to “build nations” and “export democracy” at the barrel of a gun.149 Paul disguises his Nazism with tirades against totalitarianism and writes: The founders wanted to set a high bar for the government to overcome in order to deprive an individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to include political enemies, our descent into totalitarianism is virtually assured. The PATRIOT Act, as bad as its violation against the Fourth Amendment was, was just one step down the slippery slope. The recently passed National Defense Authorization Act continues that slip into tyranny, and in fact, accelerates it significantly. It is no longer limited to members of al-Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone accused of substantially supporting such groups or associated forces. How closely associated, and what constitutes substantial support? What if it was discovered that someone who committed a terrorist act was once involved with a charity? Or suppose a political candidate? Are all donors of that candidate or supporters of that candidate now suspects and subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now an associated force?150 Paul’s agenda is to strengthen any group that hates Jews. Just like Willis Carto’s Spotlight, Paul wants to let “charitable” organizations like the Holy Land Foundation, which was convicted of supporting terrorism, operate freely in America. He wants to see the 149
. Congressional Record, V. 150, Pt. 13, July 22, 2004 to September 14, 2004 page 17847 150
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=1936:the-ndaa-repeals-more-rights
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI American Muslims elect a pro-terrorist candidate. Paul told this to Congress in November 1999: Sanctions are one thing, but seizures of bank assets of any related business to the Taliban government infuriates and incites the radicals to violence. There is no evidence that this policy serves the interests of world peace. It certainly increases the danger to all Americans as we become the number one target of terrorists. Conventional war against the United States is out of the question, but acts of terrorism, whether it is the shooting down of a civilian airliner or bombing a New York City building, are almost impossible to prevent in a reasonably open society.151 Paul was right about bombings of a New York City building being impossible to prevent in 1999 because there were few antiterrorism laws in place. Since laws like the PATRIOT Act were passed there have been no major terrorist incidents within the United States. Paul opposed The National Defense Authorization Act: The Bill of Rights has no exceptions for really bad people or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a key check on government power against any person. That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is the very strength of our legal system. The National Defense Authorization Act attempts to justify abridging the Bill of Rights on the theory that rights are suspended in a time of war, and the entire United States is a battlefield in the war on terror. This is a very dangerous development, indeed. Beware.152 151
. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 21, November 17, 1999 to December 3, 1999 page 30043 152
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=1936:the-ndaa-repeals-more-rights
A. J. WEBERMAN Paul wants to give enemy combatants the same rights as American citizens giving them a chance to be acquitted in an American court of law rather than being tried by a military tribunal. Under the guise of protecting Civil Liberties, Paul wants to security strip America by protecting those who leak classified information so that the US will become more vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Paul: It has been charged, by self-proclaimed experts, that Julian Assange, the internet publisher of this information, has committed a heinous crime deserving prosecution for treason and execution or even assassination. But should we not at least ask how the U.S. government can charge an Australian citizen with treason for publishing U.S. secret information that he did not steal?153 Paul wishes to make it easier for terrorists to board airplanes rather than to protect people’s rights: The incident of the so-called “underwear bomber” last Christmas is given as justification for the billions of dollars the federal government is spending on the new full-body imaging machines, but a Government Accountability Office study earlier this year concluded that had these scanners been in use they may not have detected the explosive material that was allegedly brought onto the airplane. Additionally, there have been recent press reports calling into question the accuracy and adequacy of these potentially dangerous machines. My legislation is simple. It establishes that airport security screeners are not immune from any US law regarding physical contact with another person, making images of another person, or causing physical harm through the use of radiation-emitting machinery on another 153
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI person. It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us.154 Why the so called underwear bomber? Was the underwear bomber a real person or a figment of the Government’s imagination? Why explosive material that was allegedly brought onto the airplane? On March 14, 2008 Paul made this statement on H.R. 3773 - FISA Amendments Act of 2008: Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this latest attempt to undermine our personal liberties and violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. This bill will allow the federal government to engage in the bulk collection of American citizens’ communications. In effect, it means that any American may have his electronic communications monitored without a search warrant. As such, the bill clearly violates the Fourth Amendment, which states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The assurances in this bill that Americans will not have their communications monitored without warrant are unconvincing. The bill merely states that the government should do its best to avoid monitoring Americans if possible. We have seen how meaningless such qualified prohibitions have been as we recount the abuses over the past several years. 154
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1796&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN Just today, we read in the news that the federal government has massively abused its ability to monitor us by improperly targeting Americans through the use of “national security letters.” Apparently some 60 percent of the more than 50,000 national security letters targeted Americans, rather than foreign terrorists, for surveillance. This is what happens when we begin down the slippery slope of giving up our constitutional rights for the promise of more security. When we come to accept that the government can spy on us without a court order we have come to accept tyranny. I urge my colleagues to reject this and all legislation that allows Americans to be spied on without a properly issued warrant.155 FISA wiretaps are authorized by the judiciary in secret to assure their efficacy. Why would a Nazi get so upset about Fourth Amendment rights when the Nazis are known for breaking down people’s doors without a warrant, searching their home and seizing their possessions? Why is Paul upset about communications being intercepted? Because he wants to see the terrorists succeed. He wants to hamstring the FBI, NSA and CIA so the terrorists have a better chance of success. He is hoping they will hit Jewish targets or New York City, which has a high percentage of Jews living there. Paul shares a common goal with the Islamist terrorists – the murder of every Jew on this planet. It sure seems as if Ron Paul is out to protect our rights when that is not the object of blocking this legislation at all. His ultimate goal is a Fifth Reich. Paul commented on Protect America Act of 2007: Madame Speaker, I rise in opposition to the extension of the Protect America Act of 2007 because the underlying legislation violates the US 155
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Constitution. The misnamed Protect America Act allows the US government to monitor telephone calls and other electronic communications of American citizens without a warrant. This clearly violates the Fourth Amendment, which states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”156 On January 30, 2008 Paul commented on a bill to extend the Protect America Act of 2007 for 30 Days: The Protect America Act sidelines the FISA Court system and places authority over foreign surveillance in the director of national intelligence and the attorney general with little if any oversight. While proponents of this legislation have argued that the monitoring of American citizens would still require a court-issued warrant, the bill only requires that subjects be "reasonably believed to be outside the United States." Further, it does not provide for the Fourth Amendment protection of American citizens if they happen to be on the other end of the electronic communication where the subject of surveillance is a non-citizen overseas.157 Paul wants to protect the rights of terrorists even when they are overseas along with the rights of terrorists living in America who get calls from terrorists overseas. Paul wants to see the number of Islamists increase in America: Remarks on Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, HR 1955. This was a bill to 156
A. J. WEBERMAN establish a commission to study homegrown terrorism. It passed the House but died in the Senate. There are many causes for concern in HR 1955. The legislation specifically singles out the Internet for “facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process” in the United States. Such language may well be the first step toward US government regulation of what we are allowed to access on the Internet. Are we, for our own good, to be subjected to the kind of governmental control of the Internet that we see in unfree societies? This bill certainly sets us on that course. (12/5/2007)158 Ron Paul continually takes the sides of the enemies of America, making excuse after excuse for terrorists. He never mentions that jihad is one of the pillars of Islam and that even if Israel were wiped off the face of the map the Islamic Fundamentalists would still hate America for being a Christian country that does not accept Islam and Shar’ia Law. In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?) We fail to realize that the extremists, willing to sacrifice their own lives to kill their enemies, do so out of a sense of weakness and desperation over real and perceived attacks on their way of life, their religion, their country and their natural resources. Without the conventional diplomatic or military means to retaliate against these attacks, and an unwillingness of their own government to address the issue, they resort to the desperation tactic of suicide terrorism. Their anger toward their own governments, which they believe are co-conspirators with the American government, is equal to or greater than that directed toward us. These errors in judgment in understanding 158
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI the motive of the enemy and the constant fear that is generated have brought us to this crisis where our civil liberties and privacy are being steadily eroded in the name of preserving national security. We may be the economic and military giant of the world, but the effort to stop this war on our liberties here at home in the name of patriotism, is being lost. (6/6/07) Fighting Terrorism With Big Government - A Convenience or Necessity? Fighting terrorism is a top concern for most Americans. It is understandable, knowing how vulnerable we now are to an attack by our enemies. But striking out against the liberties of all Americans, with the PATRIOT Act, the FBI, or Guantanamo-type justice will hardly address the problem. Liberty cannot be enhanced by undermining liberty! It is never necessary to sacrifice liberty to preserve it. Itâ€™s tempting to sacrifice liberty for safety, and that is the argument used all too often by the politicians seeking more power. But even that is not true. History shows that a strong desire for safety over liberty usually results in less of both. But that does not mean we should ignore the past attacks or the threat of future attacks that our enemies might unleash. First, fighting terrorism is a clichĂŠ. Terrorism is a technique or a process, and if not properly defined, the solutions will be hard to find. Terrorism is more properly defined as an attack by a guerrilla warrior who picks the time and place of the attack because he cannot match the enemy with conventional weapons. With too broad a definition of terrorism, the temptation will be to relinquish too much liberty, being fearful that behind every door and in every suitcase lurks a terrorist-planted bomb. Narrowing the definition of terrorism and recognizing why some become enemies is crucial. Understanding how maximum security is achieved in 229
A. J. WEBERMAN a free society is vital. We have been told that the terrorists hate us for our wealth, our freedom, and our goodness. This war cannot be won if that belief prevails.159 How much of a better way could anyone find to pitch “Allow Terrorism to Return to America” to the American people other than “if you want to be truly free you have to give terrorists some freedom to do their thing.” Paulbots are programmed to quote Ben Franklin: “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Safety from biological weapons? Chemical weapons? Radiological weapons? Dirty bombs? Suicide bombers? None of this existed back then and if Franklin was told of the casualties of 9/11 he would have been happy to give the Government the laws it needed to prevent another 9/11. Ron Paul of Texas in the House of Representatives January 9, 2003: Restoring the Second Amendment. Paul might sound like he is defending the Second Amendment but his real motivation is to place weapons in the hands of terrorists, including semi-automatic weapons that have no sporting value. He also wants to make sure that neo-Nazis and Rightwing militias have access to weapons that are easily converted to full-auto. Speaker, H.R. 3193 repeals several of the more draconian citywide Washington, DC, gun restrictions enacted in 1976. I rise to restore the right the founding fathers saw as the guarantee of every other right by introducing the Second Amendment Protection Act. This legislation reverses the steady erosion of the right to keep and bear arms by repealing unconstitutional laws that allow powerhungry federal bureaucrats to restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Specifically, my legislation repeals the five-day waiting period and the "instant" background check, which enables the federal government to compile a database of every gun owner in America. My legislation also repeals the misnamed ban on "semiautomatic" weapons, which bans entire class of firearms for no conceivable reason beside the desire of demagogic politicians to appear tough on crime. Finally, my bill amends the Gun Control Act of 1968 by deleting the "sporting purposes" test, which allows the Treasury Secretary to infringe on second amendment rights by classifying a firearm (handgun, rifle, and shotgun) as a "destructive device" simply because the Secretary believes the gun to be "nonsporting." Thomas Jefferson said "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; ...that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." Jefferson, and all of the Founders, would be horrified by the proliferation of unconstitutional legislation that prevents law-abiding Americans from exercising their right and duty to keep and bear arms. I hope my colleagues will join me in upholding the Founders' vision for a free society by cosponsoring the Second Amendment Restoration Act.160 The Founding Fathers never had access to anything but muzzle loaders so how does Paul know how they would react to putting weapons that can kill scores of people in the hands of today’s citizens, many of whom are Islamic and many of whom are parts of a permanent criminal underclass that did not exist back then? Another reason Ron Paul wants to repeal gun law is so that White can shoot Black “youth” – a euphemism for “nigger.” 160
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=298&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN From October, l992: Carjacking: A Hip-Hop Thing to Do If you live in a major city, you've probably already heard about the newest threat to your life and limb, and your family: carjacking. It is the hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos. The youth simply walk up to a car they like, pull a gun, tell the family to get out, steal their jewelry and wallets, and take the car to wreck. Such actions have ballooned in the recent months. In the old days, average people could avoid such youth by staying out of bad neighborhoods. Empowered by media, police, and political complicity, however, the youth now roam everywhere looking for cars to steal and people to rob. What can you do? More and more Americans are carrying a gun in the car. An ex-cop I know advises that if you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example). I frankly donâ€™t know what to make of such advice but even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, Iâ€™ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self-defense. For the animals are coming. Ron Paul November 13, 2002 Oppose The New Homeland Security Bureaucracy! Mr. Speaker, when the process of creating a Department of Homeland Security commenced, Congress was led to believe that the legislation would be a simple reorganization aimed at increasing efficiency, not an attempt to expand federal power. Fiscally conservative members of Congress were 232
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI even told that the bill would be budget neutral! Yet, when the House of Representatives initially considered creating a Department of Homeland Security, the legislative vehicle almost overnight grew from 32 pages to 282 pages - and the cost had ballooned to at least $3 billion. Now we are prepared to vote on a nearly 500-page bill that increases federal expenditures and raises troubling civil liberties questions. Adding insult to injury, this bill was put together late last night and introduced only this morning. Worst of all, the text of the bill has not been made readily available to most members, meaning this Congress is prepared to create a massive new federal agency without even knowing the details. This is a dangerous and irresponsible practice. The Department of Homeland has been able to prevent another 9/11 yet Paul opposed its existence on the grounds that it would be just another Government bureaucracy. What else could he say? that he opposed it because he wanted to see America take another hit like 9/11? How would Ron Paul deal with terrorism? IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 27, 2007 Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. A BILL: To authorize the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in
A. J. WEBERMAN Congress assembled, This Act may be cited as the `Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007'. SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF LETTERS OF MARQUE AND REPRISAL. The President of the United States is authorized and requested to commission, under officially issued letters of marque and reprisal, so many of privately armed and equipped persons and entities as, in his judgment, the service may require, with suitable instructions to the leaders thereof, to employ all means reasonably necessary to seize outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and its territories the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions and depredations perpetrated upon the United States of America on September 11, 2001, and for any planned future air piratical aggressions and depredations or other acts of war upon the United States of America and her people. SEC. 3. SECURITY BOND REQUIRED. No letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued by the President under this Act without requiring the posting of a security bond in such amount as the President shall determine is sufficient to ensure that the letter be executed according to the terms and conditions thereof. Does anyone really believe that a group of mercenaries would have been capable of effectuating the operation that the Navy Seals pulled-off when they captured Osama? Why the security bond? Does Paul think that Osama might sue the United States if the soldiers-of-fortune violated his rights? 234
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In 1988 at the University of Houston Paul declared “Bring American troops home, abolish the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency and dismantle every other agency except the Justice and Defense Departments.”161 The Islamists would love to the FBI dismantled as it continually brings down domestic American terrorists with sting operations. If Paul’s constituents were being investigated for terrorist activity and ties to terrorists they would have their Congressman object to anti-terrorist laws so that they either would not be unjustly accused or so that it would be easier to carry out terrorist attacks. But if you are a Texan and not involved in terrorism or not being unjustly accused of it why worry about giving the FBI more investigatory power? How is it going to affect you? Ron Paul opposes any programe that will increase America’s security: In December 2012 he stated, Earlier this month we learned that the Obama Administration is significantly expanding the number of covert Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) agents overseas. From just a few hundred DIA agents overseas today, the administration intends to eventually deploy some 1,600 covert agents. The nature of their work will also shift, away from intelligence collection and more toward covert actions. This move signals a major change in how the administration intends to conduct military and paramilitary operations overseas. Unfortunately it is not a shift toward peace, but rather to an even more deadly and disturbing phase in the “war on terror.” In 2010, I said in a speech that there had been a CIA coup in this country. The CIA runs the military, the drone program, and they are in drug trafficking. The CIA is a secretive government all on its own. With this new expanded Defense Intelligence Agency 161
A. J. WEBERMAN presence overseas it will be even worse. Because the DIA is operationally under control of the Pentagon, direct Congressional oversight of the program will be more difficult. Perhaps this is as intended. The CIA will be training the DIA in its facilities to conduct operations overseas. Much of this will include developing targeting data for the presidentâ€™s expanding drone warfare program.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER EIGHT RECONSTRUCTIONIST AND DOMINIONIST REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY Most American evangelicals are pre-millennial dispensationalists. They believe that God has a special plan for the nation of Israel, which will play a key role in the end of days and the return of Christ. A smaller segment of evangelicals holds to what’s called reformed or covenant theology, which, tends to teach that in this day the church is what Israel was in the Old Testament. In other words, Christians are the new chosen people. Covenant theologians don’t give Israel any religious significance and are much further to the right than mainstream evangelicals. While dispensationalists believe that Christ will return imminently and establish a biblical reign on earth, covenant theologians tend to believe its man’s job to create Christ’s kingdom before he comes back. The most radical faction of covenant theology is called Christian Reconstructionism, a movement founded by R. J. Rushdoony that seeks to turn the Book of Leviticus into law, imposing the death penalty for gay people, blasphemers, unchaste women, and myriad other sinners. Reconstructionists adhere to the view expressed by Ron Paul at a Pastor's Forum at Chuck Baldwin's Pensacola, Florida church that Christians are the new "chosen people," and the righteous must rule for 1,000 years before Jesus will return.162 Rushdoony is a racist, sexist, Jew-hating bigot who denies the Holocaust. In Foundations of Social Order he wrote,
. http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/153607/major_ron_paul_supporter_favors _death_penalty_for_gays/?page=entire
A. J. WEBERMAN The false witness born during World War II with respect to Germany is especially notable and revealing. The charge is repeatedly made that six million innocent Jews were slain by the Nazis, and the figure – and even larger figures – is now entrenched in the history books. Poncins, in summarizing the studies of the French Socialist, Paul Rassinier, himself a prisoner in Buchenwald, states: ‘Rassinier reached the conclusion that the number of Jews who died after deportation is approximately 1,200,000 and this figure, he tells us, has finally been accepted as valid by the Centre Mondial de Documentation Juive Contemporaine. Likewise he notes that Paul Hilberg, in his study of the same problem, reached a total of 896,292 victims. Very many of these people died of epidemics; many were executed. Did the Nazis actually execute many thousands, tens, or hundred thousands of Jews? Men to whom such murders were nothing had to blow up the figure to millions. Did the doctor perform a number of experiments on living men and women? A few sterilized women and a few castrated men and their horrified tears and grief are not enough to stir the sick and jaded tastes of modern man: make him guilty of performing 17,000 such operations. The evils were all too real: even greater is the evil of bearing false witness concerning them, because that false witness will produce an even more vicious reality in the next upheaval. Men are now ‘reconciled’ to a world where millions are murdered, or are said to be murdered. What will be required in the way of action and propaganda next time?163 Ron Paul is a favorite politician of Christian Reconstructionists. Gary North, Rushdoony's sonin-law and star polemicist of the Reconstructionist 163
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI movement was a Paul staffer during the Texas congressman’s first term and has called him the “mahatma of self-government.” “The people who I know who are big Ron Paul guys are old school Reconstructionists,” says Ron Paul supporter Brian D. Nolder, the pastor of Christ the Redeemer Church in Pella, Iowa. Rev. Phillip G. Kayser (see photo above), another prominent right-wing Reconstructionist Nebraska pastor, endorsed Paul. The campaign issued a press release citing "the enlightening statements he makes on how Ron Paul's approach to government is consistent with Christian beliefs." One of Kayser's "Christian beliefs" was applying the death penalty for gay male sex. Ron Paul's has long ties to the Reconstructionist movement, from which the more broadly accepted dominionist strain in rightwing evangelical Christianity flows. When Ron Paul exited the GOP presidential race in 2008 Ron Paul threw his support to Pastor Chuck Baldwin, who ran on the ballot of the Constitution Party, sort of the political arm of the Christian Reconstructionists. (Baldwin parts company with Reconstructionists on his idea of how the endtimes will go down, but is otherwise well-aligned with the Reconstructionist agenda). Founded in 1992 by Howard Phillips, a follower of Rushdoony, the Constitution Party offers this in the preamble to the party platform: The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries.164 Ron Paul worked with Howard Phillips in forming a shadow government to monitor the Carter Administration. Paul was the shadow Secretary of Labor.165 Howard Phillips, whose conversion to Christianity was inspired by Rushdoony himself routinely refers to gays as "sodomites" in his own writings. Rushdoony made the conversion of Jews his special mission. (Phillips is of Jewish 164
. The Morning Record and Journal - Feb 25, 1977
A. J. WEBERMAN heritage.) At a 2008 rally convened by Ron Paul in Minneapolis in the shadow of the Republican National Convention, Howard Phillips appeared as a keynote speaker. Ron Paul has appeared with Howard Phillips at Constitution Party events, and served as the keynote speaker of the 35th anniversary gala of the Conservative Caucus, another of Howard Phillips' groups. In the 1940s and 1960s, segregationists Strom Thurmond and George Wallace won chunks of the electoral vote for their own third parties. (Wallace's vehicle, the American Independent Party, came under the Constitution Party tent in 1992.) This is a sample of Constitution Party thought: We, the members of the American Constitution Party, gratefully acknowledge the blessings of the Lord God as the Creator, Preserver, and Ruler of the universe and of our nation. We hereby appeal to Him for aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Divine Providence as we work to restore and preserve this nation as a government of, by, and for the people. Our republic is a nation governed by a constitution rooted in Biblical law and administered by representatives elected by the people to preserve, protect, and defend it against attacks by all its enemies, whether from without or within. We affirm the principles of inherent, unalienable, individual rights upon which these United States of America were founded. The sole legitimate function of government is to secure these rights through the preservation of domestic tranquility, the maintenance of a strong national defense, and the promotion of equal justice for all. The federal government has no role as an instrument of salvation. Salvation is by the blood of Christ and faith in Him by God's grace.166
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Together with Howard Phillips and John Birch Society president John McManus, Paul has spun a conspiracy theory about an imminent threat to U.S. sovereignty under the non-existent North American Union, which the three contend is a European Union-style plan already under way, designed to erase America's national borders and eradicate U.S. currency. Ron Paul's demand for a return to the gold standard for U.S. currency, as well as his disdain for the Federal Reserve, align perfectly with the "biblical" monetary policy positions espoused by Rushdoony in his book entitled The Institutes. Members of the Christian Identity Church, also believe they are the chosen people, and not the Jews, who they have replaced. This is the basis of Replacement theology. Christian Identity's origins can be traced back to the nineteenth century in Great Britain, where a small circle of religious thinkers advanced the idea, known as British-Israelism that modern Europeans were biologically descended from the ancient Israelites of the Old Testament, specifically, from the Lost Tribes scattered by invasions of Hittites, Assyrians and Babylonians. The Lost Tribes had purportedly made their way to Europe, and from them descended the modern European nationalities. British-Israelism increasingly advanced the idea, common in anti-Semitic circles in the early twentieth century, that most Jews were not really descendants of ancient Israelites, but were instead descended from an Asiatic people known as the Khazars, who settled near the Black Sea during the Middle Ages. European (Ashkenazic) Jews were thus "false" Israelites who further obscured the fact that it was really White Europeans who were the "true" Israelites. Every Nazi rag has a reference to the “Khazar conversion” thanks to Arthur Koestler, who wrote a book entitled The Thirteenth Tribe. Having lived through the horrors of World War II Koestler was attempting to show that Jews were really Aryans, by pointing to the fact that Christians in Khazikistan had converted to Judaism. So what? They were only a small portion of the Jewish world population at the time. 241
A. J. WEBERMAN Unfortunately Koestlerâ€™s desire to purge the Jews of their Middle Eastern heritage was used by the Nazis to attack Jews. One of the most influential British-Israel advocates of this and other anti-Jewish ideas was William J. Cameron, editor of the Dearborn Independent, the weekly newspaper published by Henry Ford in the 1920s, and Ford's press adviser until the 1940s. The key figure in the transformation of British-Israelism into what was increasingly called "Christian Identity" was Wesley Swift (1913-1970), a former Methodist minister from Southern California. In the 1940s, Swift started his own church, later known as the Church of Jesus Christ Christian. He was active in extreme rightwing groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, and developed a close friendship with the nation's most prominent postwar anti-Semite, Gerald L. K. Smith. Because of the activities of Swift, Christian Identity increasingly became linked with extreme right-wing ideologies. Christian Identity penetrated most of the major Nazi movements. Thanks to Aryan Nations, many neo-Nazis became believers. Klan leaders such as Thomas Robb and Louis Beam adopted the faith, as did some racist skinheads, such as the Hammerskins. Christian Identity also found a welcome home in extreme anti-government activism, notably the tax protest movement, the sovereign citizen movement (descended from William Potter Gale's Posse Comitatus) and the militia movement. The resurgence of right-wing extremism in the 1990s following the Ruby Ridge and Waco standoffs further spread Identity beliefs.167 Willis Carto has apparently become an adherent of Christian Identity. In an article posted on The Barnes Review website entitled, "Is Christianity Relevant?," he claimed that the "present day Jews are not the descendants of the group celebrated in the Old Testament but as a combination of races in no way connected to it."
. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Christian_Identity.asp? xpicked=4&item=Christian_ID
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In his address to the segregationist John Birch Society's 50th Anniversary Gala in 2008, Ron Paul spoke in the code he knew would be understood by Christian Reconstructionists and Christian Identitists alike, who have long ties to the Birch Society. Reconstructionists refer to the righteous who reside in a land swept by evil as "the remnant." (A prominent Christian Reconstructionist publication is called The Remnant Review). "The remnant holds the truth together," Paul told the Birchers, "both the religious truth and the political truth.'" Paul also used the “remnant” dog whistle term in his speech to his supporters in Maine after he lost the caucus there. Paul is no fan of Roman Catholicism and in February 2004 he stated: This war started a long time before 9-11. That attack was just the most dramatic event of the war so far. The Arabs have fought Western crusaders for centuries, and they have not yet forgotten the European Crusades centuries ago.168 On March 28, 2006 in Making the World Safe for Christianity he wrote: The toughest task is analyzing what we do from their perspective. We should try harder to place ourselves in the shoes of those who live in the Arab countries where our efforts currently are concentrated. We are outraged by a Muslim country that would even consider the death penalty for a Christian convert. But many Muslims see all that we do as a reflection of western Christianity, which to them includes Europe and America. They see everything in terms of religion.169
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60 169 . http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=182&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN In commenting on an immigration bill aimed at keeping Catholic Mexicans out of the United States, Paul revealed his fondness for FAIR - Federation for American Immigration Reform – an organization listed as a hate from by the Southern Poverty Law Center. There are some elements of this new bill to be applauded. Measures to require detention of, and expedited removal of aliens, for example, are a good step. Also to be applauded is the requirement for an additional 250 inspectors at U.S. ports of entry each year from 2007 through 2010, although this is unfortunately subject to the availability of funds. But overall this bill is a weak substitute for real immigration and border reform. As the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) says, H.R. 4437 “treats some of the symptoms, it does not, in fact, do enough to actually cure the illness.”170 At the center of the anti-Mexican immigrant web is the nonprofit Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the most important organization fueling the backlash against immigration. Founded in 1979, FAIR has long been marked by antiLatino and anti-Catholic attitudes. It has mixed this bigotry with a fondness for eugenics, the idea of breeding better humans discredited by its Nazi associations. It has accepted $1.2 million from the Pioneer Fund, an infamous foundation. It has employed officials in key positions who are also members of white supremacist groups. Recently, it has promoted racist conspiracy theories about Mexico's secret designs on the American Southwest and an alternative theory alleging secret plans to merge the United States, Mexico and Canada. A senior FAIR official sought "advice" from the leaders of a racist Belgian political party. These are Paul’s thoughts on immigration:
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Here is a road map for real immigration reform. First we need better enforcement of the laws we’ve got — which plainly call for illegal immigrants to be arrested and deported and for our borders to be secure. These things are already law, but the executive branch over the past decades has failed to enforce them. Congress can pass any law it wants, but unless federal agencies enforce those laws they are meaningless. Second we need to eliminate the two main magnets attracting illegal immigrants to illegally enter the country, the welfare magnet and the citizenship magnet. Failure to address these in an immigration bill raises questions about achieving real results. That is why I introduced three amendments to this bill, in the hopes that we can finally do something about the problem of illegal immigration. I introduced an amendment to end so-called “birth-right citizenship,” whereby anyone born on U.S. soil is automatically an American citizen. I introduced an amendment to end the practice of providing U.S. Social Security payments to non-U.S. citizens. And finally I introduced an amendment to prohibit illegal aliens from receiving food stamps, student loans, or other federally-provided assistance. Unfortunately, none of my amendments were even allowed to reach the Floor for a vote.171 These ideas go against traditional libertarian thinking. The Libertarian Party Platform states that Libertarians are prepared to welcome refugees, and the LP works against discriminatory policies. It states that a free market requires the free movement of both capital and labor across borders. Older LP Platform stances were more pro-open borders. The 2004 Platform called for "the 171
A. J. WEBERMAN elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally.” This is where Ron Paul’s libertarian cover would prove to be a big liability if he applied libertarian ideas consistently. He would be voted out of office by his Texan constituency. Paul stated: I voted in favor of the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 and for the SAFE Port Act of 2006. I continue to support measures that help secure our borders and thereby make us less vulnerable to future foreign attack.172 What happened to Paul’s steadfast rule about the only true federal crimes being engaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy? It would have been too much for his constituents to handle had he voted against this bill. Paul refused to come to the aid of his fellow Christians who were being slaughtered by Muslims in Dafur.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
A. J. WEBERMAN
CHAPTER NINE LUDWIG VON MISES: FASCIST JEWISH ECONOMIST In Time Magazine 2008 Ron for Person of the Year:
Amid a horrific financial crisis, all we hear are calls for more of the money-printing, spending and subsidies that created this mess. So I choose my great teacher, Ludwig von Mises, champion of the Austrian School of economics, who taught us how a central bank like the Fed causes booms and busts and how to build prosperity through sound money and economic freedom. Ludwig Von Mises taught at the Vienna University from 1913 to 1934, while also serving as a principal economic adviser to the Fascist Austrian government during the Austrofascist regime of Engelbert Dollfuss. Chancellor Dollfuss was killed in July 1934, during an attempt by Austria's Nazis to topple the regime and seize power for Nazi Germany. Despite Dollfuss’ death, the attempt failed and Kurt Schuschnigg succeeded as Chancellor and ruled until the demise of the regime in 1938. The Austrian state from 1933 to 1938 was not authoritarian, it was fascist, and the connection between Austrian pan-German identity and the state’s fascistizing policies in the media, education and population politics can shed light on the politics of Von Mises in the 1930s. Austro-fascism was an attempt to turn Austria into a fascist state similar to Franco’s Spain and Mussolini’s Italy that failed after the Anschluss, the 1938 Nazi annexation of Austria. Ludwig Von Mises was a fascist economist who opposed labor unions and all progressive Austrian economics. 248
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Unemployment grew drastically under the Austrofascist regime to over 25% between 1932 and 1933. In response, the government removed unemployment benefits from the national budget. Additionally, the government created the so-called "Cooperations" of workers and enterprisers charged with undermining workers' movements. International trade was restricted and eventually banned. In 1934 Mises left for Geneva, Switzerland. This dirt bag who looked like Adolf Hitler knew that no matter how much he swore allegiance to fascist doctrine the Nazis would exterminate him simply because he was a Jew. This brought him to his senses. In Switzerland he was a professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies. In 1940, he immigrated to New York City. He was a visiting professor at New York University from 1945 until he retired in 1969, though he was not salaried by the university due to his crackpot economic theories. Instead, he earned his living from funding by laissez faire economists such as Lawrence Fertig. Had Von Mises not been a Jew he would have been a willing collaborator with the Nazis. His having to leave his homeland put him in touch with the true nature of the Nazis and he wrote the following, which however still evidences his own self hatred: If the Jews themselves are to blame for the fact that those whose ideal is perpetual war and bloodshed, who worship violence and are eager to destroy freedom, consider them the most dangerous opponents of their endeavors, it must be because the Jews are foremost among the champions of freedom, justice, and peaceful co-operation among nations. If the Jews have incurred the Nazis' hatred through their own conduct, it is no doubt because what was great and noble in the German nation, all the immortal achievements of Germany's past, were either accomplished by the Jews or congenial to the 249
A. J. WEBERMAN Jewish mind. As the parties seeking to destroy modern civilization and return to barbarism have put anti-Semitism at the top of their programs, this civilization is apparently a creation of the Jews. Nothing more flattering could be said of an individual or of a group than that the deadly foes of civilization have well-founded reasons to persecute them.173 Ron Paulâ€™s close associate, Lew Rockwell, is head of the Von Mises Institute along with Murray Rothbard a Jew who supported David Duke: Well, they finally got David Duke. But he sure scared the bejesus out of them. It took a massive campaign of hysteria, of fear and hate, orchestrated by all wings of the Ruling Elite, from Official right to left, from President Bush and the official Republican Party through the New York-Washington-run national media through the local elites and down to local leftwing activists. It took a massive scare campaign, not only invoking the old bogey images of the Klan and Hitler, but also, more concretely, a virtual threat to boycott Louisiana, to pull out tourists and conventions, to lose jobs by businesses leaving the state. It took a campaign of slander that resorted to questioning the sincerity of Duke's conversion to Christianity â€“ even challenging him to name his "official church." The reality of the current system is that it constitutes an unholy alliance of "corporate liberal" Big Business and media elites, who, through big government, have privilege and have caused to rise up a parasitic Underclass, who, among them all, are looting and oppressing the bulk of the middle and working classes in America. Therefore, the proper strategy of 173
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI libertarians and paleos is a strategy of "right-wing populism," that is: to expose and denounce this unholy alliance, and to call for getting this preppieunderclass-liberal media alliance off the backs of the rest of us: the middle and working classes.174 Rothbard’s ideas are quite similar to Dukes with the exception of sending the Blacks back to Africa and gassing American Jews. A right-wing populist program, then, must concentrate on dismantling the crucial existing areas of State and elite rule, and on liberating the average American from the most flagrant and oppressive features of that rule. In short: 1. Slash Taxes. All taxes, sales, business, property, etc., but especially the most oppressive politically and personally: the income tax. We must work toward repeal of the income tax and abolition of the IRS. 2. Slash Welfare. Get rid of underclass rule by abolishing the welfare system, or, short of abolition, severely cutting and restricting it. 3. Abolish Racial or Group Privileges. Abolish affirmative action, set aside racial quotas, etc., and point out that the root of such quotas is the entire "civil rights" structure, which tramples on the property rights of every American. 4. Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And by this I mean, of course, not "white collar criminals" or "inside traders" but violent street criminals – robbers, muggers, rapists, and murderers. Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant
A. J. WEBERMAN punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error. 5. Take Back the Streets: Get Rid of the Bums. Again: unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares? Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from the ranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to the ranks of the productive members of society.175
Rothbard, a leading member of the American Council on Judaism was a Jew who hated Jews. He said America made a grave mistake when it entered World War II. Rothbard blamed many later problems on the fact that the United States participated in the war. He tried to justify Nazi Germany by claiming Hitler’s actions were defensive. Libertarian Chris Tame witnessed Rothbard claim the Holocaust was just propaganda made up to justify WW II after the war. That was the line taken by Rothbard’s favorite historian176, Harry Elmer Barnes, a prominent member of the America First Committee who authored Holocaust denial books published by Noontide Press. As Willis Carto stated, he publishes the Barnes Review, a Holocaust denying rag named in honor of Harry Elmer Barnes, in lieu of the Institute for Historical Review’s magazine. Rothbard wrote and Rockwell disseminated this: 175
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Now revisionism teaches us that this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth. If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler's Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions, about the current World War III version of the same myth. Nothing would stop the current headlong flight to war faster, or more surely cause people to begin to reason about foreign affairs once again, after a long orgy of emotion and cliché. The task of revisionism has been to penetrate beneath these superficialities and appearances to the stark realities underneath – realities which show, certainly in this century, the United States, Great Britain, and France – the three great "democracies" – to be worse than any other three countries in fomenting and waging aggressive war. Realization of this truth would be of incalculable importance on the current scene.177 Paul is constantly quoting this sick, self-hating Jew. In his Texas Straight Talk newsletter in July 2012 he wrote, “As Murray Rothbard put it, "Fractional reserve banks ... create money out of thin air. Essentially they do it in the same way as counterfeiters. Counterfeiters, too, create money out of thin air by printing something masquerading as money or as a warehouse receipt for money. In this way, they fraudulently extract resources from the public, from the people who have genuinely earned their money.” Ron Paul, like Rothbard, demonized the Federal Reverse. Paul introduced a bill to abolish it: Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up for working Americans by putting an end to the manipulation of the money supply which erodes 177
A. J. WEBERMAN Americans' standard of living, enlarges big government, and enriches well-connected elites, by cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve. Madame Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation to restore financial stability to America's economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people.178 Same old rightwing nonsense that suggested the Fed was some sort of a conspiracy to benefit the well-connected elites â€“ the Jews. The fact that many of its chairmen had been Jews played into this. Ahmadinejad was also a fan of well-connected elites and on August 28, 2007 stated, Zionists are people without any religion. They are lying about being Jewish because religion means brotherhood, friendship and respecting other divine religions. They are an organized minority who have infiltrated the world. They are not even a 10,000strong organization. Congressman Charles Lindberg Sr. opposed the establishment of the Federal Reserve: The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation...they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and then bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices...the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.179 178
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Where would we be without the Fed in the Ron Paul world of economics based on the works of a fascist economist named Ludwig Von Mises? Interest rates would fluctuate wildly. Who would control interest rates in a Fed-less world? An unfettered free market? A cabal of Wall Street bankers? Congress? You can see the problems with these scenarios. There would be more bank failures: The Fed serves as a last-resort lender for struggling financial institutions. Without it, weâ€™d almost certainly see more bank failures, from Main Street to Wall Street. There would be less lending: Without the support of the Fed and other safeguards, banks would be far more conservative in their lending. Fewer people would qualify for mortgages, fewer businesses would be funded, and the economy would look very different.180 Not only does Paul want to get rid of the Fed, he wants to abolish the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation:
THE TROUBLE WITH DEPOSIT INSURANCE The purpose of reconciliation is to identify suitable targets for budget reductions in order to reduce spending. Therefore, it is quite odd that the Financial Services Committee would use reconciliation as a vehicle to consider the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act, as this act could increase the possibility of future bank failures, and thus increase federal expenditures. The bill does this by expanding the federal government's unconstitutional control over the financial services industry. This bill also raises taxes on all financial institutions. Therefore, I must oppose this bill. 179
A. J. WEBERMAN I primarily object to the provisions in this legislation which may increase the premiums assessed on participating financial institutions. These "premiums,'' which are actually taxes, are the premier sources of funds for the Deposit Insurance Fund. This fund is used to bail out banks who experience difficulties meeting their commitments to their depositors. Thus, the deposit insurance system transfers liability for poor management decisions from those who made the decisions, to their competitors. This system punishes those financial institutions which follow sound practices, as they are forced to absorb the losses of their competitors. This also compounds the moral hazard problem created whenever government socializes business losses. In the event of a severe banking crisis, Congress will likely transfer funds from the general revenue into the Deposit Insurance Fund, which could make all taxpayers liable for the mistakes of a few. Of course, such a bailout would require separate authorization from Congress, but can anyone imagine Congress saying "No'' to banking lobbyists pleading for relief from the costs of bailing out their weaker competitors?181 Given his antipathy towards FDIC, and the ease with which Ron Paul can avoid supporting this system (by simply withdrawing one's money from a bank), you'd expect Ron Paul to have no contact with the FDIC banking system, right? Wrong. As shown by Ron Paul's 2010 Presidential Campaign financial disclosure forms Paul not only uses FDIC protection, but actively maximizes his protection by keeping the maximum amount of money covered in FDIC in one bank, and then spreading the rest out to a number of other financial institutions. If 181
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul was able to abolish the FDIC a massive bank failure could lead to another Depression. Paul’s knows this as well as I do but he wants another Depression so a Nazi can take power and blame the economic disaster on the Jews. Paul is conversant with the most far out gold conspiracy theories: Gold Reserve Transparency Act For far too long, the United States government has been less than transparent in releasing information relating to its gold holdings. Not surprisingly, this secrecy has given rise to a number of theories about the gold at Fort Knox and other depositories. Some people speculate that the gold has been involved in gold swaps with foreign governments or bullion banks, others believe that the gold has secretly been shipped out of Fort Knox and sold, and still others believe that the bars at Fort Knox are actually goldplated tungsten. Historically, the Treasury and Mint have dismissed these theories, rather than addressing these concerns with substantive rebuttals. No one from Congress has been allowed to view the gold at Fort Knox in nearly 40 years, recent photographs of the gold holdings seem to be hard to come by, and the Mint's and Inspector General's audit statements contain only the bare minimum of information.182 Paul’s financial statements indicate that most of his wealth is in the form of non-numismatic gold coins and stock in gold mining companies. With gold at $1700 an ounce Paul must be a very rich man today. Another economist favored by Paul is Friedrich A. Hayek. Hayek was a student of Von Mises and worked under him in the Austrian government’s economic section. Hayek traced the rise of 182
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1881&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN Austrian anti-Semitism to the immigration of “visibly different” Jews from Poland when anti-Semitism in Austria was endemic. When I grew up in Vienna the established Jewish families were a generally respected group and all decent people would frown upon the occasional antiJewish outbursts of a few popular politicians. It was the sudden influx of large numbers of Galician and Polish Jews [during World War I] … which in a short period changed the attitude. They were too visibly different to be readily absorbed.183 Hayek also claimed that it was “the rise of the violent antiSemitism which led to Hitler, not the other way around.” Hayek’s family might have been secret Jews. He had a second cousin on his mother’s side who was Jewish and he did not return to Austria after it was annexed by Germany. Before the end of World War II, in 1944, Hayek, who was later to win the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science, startled the Western world with a book entitled The Road to Serfdom. Despite the fact that New Deal economics based on the principles of John Maynard Keynes had rescued America from the Great Depression and the progressive politics that accompanied it gave birth to Lend Lease and anti-Nazism before Pearl Harbor Hayek formulated the crackpot theory that these economic and political ideas were eventually going to turn America into a Nazi country. THE AUTHOR has spent about half his adult life in his native Austria, in close touch with German thought, and the other half in the United States and England. In the latter period he has become increasingly convinced that some of the forces which destroyed freedom in Germany are also at work here. The very magnitude of the outrages committed by the National Socialists has strengthened the assurance that a totalitarian system cannot happen here. But let 183
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI us remember that 15 years ago the possibility of such a thing happening in Germany would have appeared just as fantastic not only to nine tenths of the Germans themselves but also to the most hostile foreign observer. There are many features which were then regarded as "typically German" which are now equally familiar in America and England, and many symptoms that point to a further development in the same direction: the increasing veneration for the state, the fatalistic acceptance of "inevitable trends," the enthusiasm for "organization" of everything (we now call it "planning"). The character of the danger is, if possible, even less understood here than it was in Germany. The supreme tragedy is still not seen that in Germany it was largely people of good will, who, by their socialist policies, prepared the way for the forces which stand for everything they detest. Few recognize that the rise of fascism and Nazism was not a reaction against the socialist trends of the preceding period but a necessary outcome of those tendencies. Yet it is significant that many of the leaders of these movements, from Mussolini down (and including Laval and Quisling) began as socialists and ended as fascists or Nazis. In the democracies at present, many who sincerely hate all of Nazism's manifestations are working for ideals whose realization would lead straight to the abhorred tyranny. Most of the people whose views influence developments are in some measure socialists. They believe that our economic life should be "consciously directed," that we should substitute "economic planning" for the competitive system. Yet is there a greater tragedy imaginable than that, in our endeavor 259
A. J. WEBERMAN consciously to shape our future in accordance with high ideals, we should in fact unwittingly produce the very opposite of what we have been striving for? No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic.184 Hayek came out with these anti-New Deal ideas a year before the war ended. I believe these ideas were demoralizing to the war effort as America and the Soviet Union were allies and the implication here is that there would be no moral difference had we allied ourselves with the Nazis. In 1947 Hayek started the Mont Pelerin Society with the help of Tea Party backer Charles C. Koch. In February 2012 Paul staged his rally near the nation's World War I museum in Missouri, asserting that the U.S. got off track about 100 years ago during the era of President Woodrow Wilson, who led the nation through World War I and unsuccessfully advocated for the nation's involvement in a forerunner of the United Nations. We've slipped away from a true Republic. Now we're slipping into a fascist system where it's a combination of government and big business and authoritarian rule and the suppression of the individual rights of each and every American citizen.185 184
. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents By Friedrich August Hayek, Bruce Caldwell
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI This labeling of a liberal economic system as fascist is right out of Hayek.
A. J. WEBERMAN
CHAPTER TEN RON PAULâ€™S AMERICA
Assuming Ron Paul was serious about implementing his social and political programs what would America be like? GLOBAL WARMING President Ron Paul would not enter into any treaty regarding global warming and the rise in the temperature of the earthâ€™s surface would continue. Paul: There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. 262
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI The environmentalists have given us global warming hysteria, based on speculative computer models instead of actual temperature data, to justify a treaty to impose federal and international taxes, rationing and prohibitions on all U.S. carbon-based energy sources. (June 4, 2009) Above all, we must never forget our contract with the American people – the Constitution that provides the sole source of legitimacy of our government. That Constitution requires that we preserve the basic human rights of our people – including the right to freely manufacture, use, and sell energy produced by any means they devise – including nuclear, hydrocarbon, solar, wind, or even bicycle generators. "While it is evident that the human right to produce and use energy does not extend to activities that actually endanger the climate of the Earth upon which we all depend, bogus claims about climate dangers should not be used as a justification to further limit the American people's freedom," Paul said.186 THE ENVIRONMENT President Paul would repeal all environmental legislation. Paul: On environment, governments don't have a good reputation for doing a good job protecting the environment. If you look at the extreme of socialism or communism, they were poor environmentalists. Private property owners have a much better record of taking care of the environment. If you look at the common ownership of the lands in the West, they're 186
. http://evergreenmagazine.com/web/Senator_to_demand_probe_of_global_ warming_fraud_.html
A. J. WEBERMAN much more poorly treated than those that are privately owned. In a free-market system, nobody is permitted to pollute their neighbor's private property -- water, air, or land. It is very strict.187 Here is what Paul had to say about Earth Day. Here are just some of the “achievements” of an environmental movement that has flourished by promoting fantastic enviro-scares, sending out millions of pieces of semi-hysterical direct mail fundraising letters, peddling junk science, and making ever-more-collusive legal deals. A failed Endangered Species Act which, by substituting “ecosystem” control for species protection incentives, has caused thousands of landowners to drive off or exterminate the very species that were supposed to be protected. A wetlands protection program that has gone from controlling real wetlands to regulating buffer zones around tiny “vernal pools” of spring snow melt, and even lands that have no water on them at all, but feature “hydric soils.” An air quality program that denies permits to dry cleaning plants unless they can prove that their emissions will not cause 300,001 instead of the normal 300,000 cancer deaths among 1 million people who will live for 70 consecutive years next door to the plant. A “superfund” bill which has sucked billions of dollars out of taxpayers to pay lawyers to pursue “potentially responsible parties” instead of actually cleaning up toxic waste sites. An ozone depletion scare whose purported effect — increasing incidence of dangerous ultraviolet B at ground level — turned out to be unsupportable by 187
. Amanda Little, "An interview with Ron Paul about his presidential platform on energy and the environment," Grist, 16 Oct. 2007
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI evidence. Ludicrous requirements imposed on the nuclear energy industry, such as requiring massive concrete vaults for the storage of old coveralls and air filters whose radioactivity level a few feet from the container is less than the background radiation produced by ordinary Vermont granite.188 Paul would make America a barren land devoid of animal life. There would be less wetlands, more pollution, less cleanup of polluted areas, more cancer through a depletion of the ozone layer and less stringent rules regarding the disposal of radioactive material. The younger generation must be desperate to get behind someone like him who would expose them to higher cancer rates. President Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. The Department of Energy (DOE) is a Cabinet level department of the United States government concerned with the United States' policies regarding energy and safety in handling nuclear material. Its responsibilities include the U.S.’s nuclear weapons program, nuclear reactor production for the United States Navy, radioactive waste disposal, and domestic energy production. DOE also sponsors more basic and applied scientific research than any other US federal agency; most of this is funded through its system of United States Department of Energy National Laboratories. Are the States going to take over the nuclear safety function or will the DOE become part of the Pentagon where it polices and oversees itself? Is this function going to be privatized? The DOE has kept things relatively safe. Is it really worth the savings to put America’s nuclear weapons at risk? Ron Paul knows this so what is his hidden agenda here? Possibly to consolidate the President’s control over the nuclear arsenal? Next President Ron Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. On November 14, 2008 Ron Paul said this in a New York Times interview:
. 1999 Ron Paul 31:15
A. J. WEBERMAN First, the Constitution does not authorize the Department of Education, and the founders never envisioned the federal government dictating those education policies. Second, it is a huge bureaucracy that squanders our money. We send billions of dollars to Washington and get back less than we sent. The money would be much better off left in states and local communities rather than being squandered in Washington. Finally, I think that the smallest level of government possible best performs education. Teachers, parents, and local community leaders should be making decisions about exactly how our children should be taught, not Washington bureaucrats. The Department of Education has given us the No Child Left Behind law, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the hands of the people. One of the things the Department of Education does is enforcing Public Law 94-142. Before the enactment of Public Law 94-142, the fate of many individuals with disabilities was likely to be death. Too many individuals lived in state institutions for persons with mental retardation or mental illness. In 1967, for example, state institutions were homes for almost 200,000 persons with significant disabilities. These restrictive settings provided only minimal food, clothing, and shelter. Too often, retarded persons were merely accommodated until they died. It is the purpose of Public Law 94-142 is to assure that all handicapped children have available to them, within the time periods specified in section 612(2) (B) 266
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI a free appropriate public education which emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs, to assure that the rights of handicapped children and their parents or guardians are protected, to assist States and localities to provide for the education of all handicapped children and to assess and assure the effectiveness of efforts to educate handicapped children. The first people the Nazis killed were retarded people. As part of Action T4, six death institutes were set up in 1940 and 1941 across the German Reich under the direction of the branches of the Nazi Party, overseen by a specially-created centre for the extermination program, established at Tiergartenstrabe 4, Berlin. These institutes were responsible for gassing 70,000 mentally ill and mentally retarded patients from psychiatric institutions, old people’s homes, nursing homes and hospitals. Additionally, the No Child Left Behind law benefits AfricanAmericans as do other functions of the Department of Education. 189 President Paul would abolish THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all. HUD is working to strengthen the housing market to bolster the economy and protect consumers; meet the need for quality affordable rental homes: utilize housing as a platform for improving quality of life; build inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination; and transform the way HUD does business. This one is an easy one to figure out how getting rid of HUD fits into Paul’s hidden agenda. It benefits Blacks who he hates. He 189
A. J. WEBERMAN would also get rid of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR which encompasses: Bureau of Indian Affairs Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Bureau of Reclamation Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement National Park Service Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey Leave all of this responsibility to corrupt State Legislators and the entire environment will go to hell. It wonâ€™t be long until the National Parks have been sold off then privatized or developed. President Paul would also abolish the Transportation Security Administration, leaving security at airports and other transportation systems up to the private sector.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
How would gay people fare in Ron Paul’s America? After Sasha Baron pretended to come on to Paul, Paul stated, "I was expecting an interview on Austrian economics. So, that didn't turn out that way. But, by the time he started pulling his pants down, I, What is going on here? I ran out of the room. This interview has ended. When this all gets out, I'm probably going to have to apologize to my supporters because I think most of them are going to figure out why in the world didn't I sock this guy in the nose?" 190 From the Ron Paul newsletter: Mass. Legislature Found Only 99% Crazy The Massachusetts legislature has just passed a “civil rights” law to protect gays from discrimination. Like all civil rights laws, it gives the officially accredited victims special privileges, but there is one interesting note. Over the protests of the gay community, the law excludes from protection anyone “whose sexual orientation involves minor children as the sex object.” Now we know what is
A. J. WEBERMAN the next frontier for “anti-discrimination” laws in Teddy Kennedy’s home state.
So in Ron Paul’s America gays would be considered precursors to child molesters. One clue to how President Paul would treat gays comes from the fact that the Nazis banned homosexual activity as early as 1935. And in 1936, the Nazi Party established a Central Office for Combating Abortion and Homosexuality. In 1941 Hitler ordered the death penalty for any SS and police members found guilty of homosexual activity. Between 1933 and 1945, the Nazis arrested roughly 100,000 men as homosexuals. Most were sent to prison, but between 5,000 and 15,000 ended up in death camps, where they were forced to wear pink triangles. Most of these men were murdered. But Ron Paul must maintain his libertarian credentials so he does a balancing act when it comes to gays. Paul did not support a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage: Mr. Speaker, while I oppose federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman, I do not believe a constitutional amendment is either a necessary or proper way to defend marriage. Because of the dangers to liberty and traditional values posed by the unexpected consequences of amending the Constitution to strip power from the states and the people and further empower Washington, I cannot in good conscience support the marriage amendment to the United States Constitution. Instead, I plan to continue working to enact the Marriage Protection Act and protect each state’s right not to be forced to recognize a same sex marriage. (9/30/2004)191 On the other hand, according to the website OnTheIssues.org, Paul voted against allowing gay adoptions in Washington, D.C.; supported "Don't Ask, Don't Tell;" and said that the Defense of 191
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Marriage Act was "proper." Paul has also stated that he thinks marriage should only be between a man and a woman. But others around him can be more frank. Mike Heath, Paul’s Iowa state director, is a former board chairman of Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, which the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies as a hate group. Had Paul won the Iowa caucuses, it would have actually been a triumph for a fundamentalist faction that has until now been considered a fringe even on the Christian right. Eric Rittberg reported that Ron Paul has AIDSaphobia: In 1988, Ron had a hardcore Libertarian supporter, Jim Peron, owner of Laissez Faire Books in San Francisco. Jim set up a magnificent 3-day campaign swing for us in the SF Bay Area. Jim was what you would call very openly Gay. But Ron thought the world of him. For 3 days we had a great time trouncing from one campaign event to another with Jim’s Gay lover. The atmosphere was simply jovial between the four of us. (As an aside we also met former Congressman Pete McCloskey during this campaign trip). We used Jim’s home/office as a “base.” Ron pulled me aside the first time we went there, and specifically instructed me to find an excuse to excuse him to a local fast food restaurant so that he could use the bathroom. He told me very clearly, that although he liked Jim, he did not wish to use his bathroom facilities. I chided him a bit, but he sternly reacted, as he often did to me, Eric, just do what I say. Perhaps “sternly” is an understatement. Ron looked at me directly, and with
A. J. WEBERMAN a very angry look in his eye, and shouted under his breath: “Just do what I say NOW.”192 Jim Peron has strong ties to the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) and published a pedophile journal called Unbound out of his San Francisco bookstore (called free forum books) which is a pedophile journal. His bookstore in San Francisco was raided twice by police because of at least one employee’s child molesting habits and the pedophile literature was confiscated. Peron hosted NAMBLA meetings at his bookstore and the 1st journal was written in 1987 before Paul went and hung out with him for three days. The second incident involved one or two other staffers many years later at the BBQ in Surfside Beach. I was not in direct presence of the incident. But another top staffer, and I believe one of our secretaries, was witness to it. This top staffer adores Ron, but was extremely insulted by his behavior, I would even say flabbergasted to the point of considering resigning from his staff over it. “Bobby,” a well-known and rather flamboyant and well-liked gay man in Freeport came to the BBQ. Let me stress Ron likes Bobby personally, and Bobby was a hardcore campaign supporter. But after his speech at the Surfside Pavilion Bobby came up to Ron with his hand extended, and according to my fellow staffer, Ron literally swatted his hand away. Some parts of Ron Paul’s newsletter were written from the point of view of a Doctor interested in quack theories about the AIDS virus. Paul touted a now discredited theory that AIDS was produced by the United States Army’s Special Weapons Division located at Fort Detrick, Maryland: 192
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI AIDS: Something Else We Can Thank Government For? William C. Douglass, MD, writing in the antigovernment medicine Health Freedom News, gives a fascinating analysis of AIDS and speculates on its origin. I’d like to share his research with you: “There are many viruses that grow in animals, and many in humans,” he points out, “but most of the viruses that grow in animals don’t affect humans.” For example, “the bovine leukemia virus” is “lethal to cows but not humans.” “The sheep visna virus is also non-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are ‘retroviruses’ meaning they can change the genetic composition of cells they enter.” Dr. Douglass believes that AIDS is a deliberately engineered hybrid of these two animal viruses cultured in human tissue, and he blames World Health Organization experimentation at Ft. Detrick, Maryland. Ft. Detrick is one of the centers of biological warfare research, where federal scientists are engaged in deliberately manufacturing deadly diseases for World War III. Could they have produced AIDS? Could the government have experimented with it in the civilian population, as it did in the 1950s with the LSD, and had things get out of control? I don’t know, but these sure are interesting questions. “I have always said,” notes Dr. Douglass, “and our forefathers told us this, that the greatest threat to the people is always the government. Not foreign governments, but our own government.”
A. J. WEBERMAN This conspiracy theory was invented by the KGB. Operation Infektion was a KGB disinformation campaign to spread lies that the United States Army invented HIV/AIDS as part of a biological weapons research project at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The Soviet Union used it to undermine the United States’ credibility, foster anti-Americanism, isolate America abroad, and create tensions between host countries and the U.S. over the presence of American military bases (which were often portrayed as the cause of AIDS outbreaks in local populations). According to U.S. State Department analysts, another reason the Soviet Union "promoted the AIDS disinformation may have been its attempt to distract international attention away from its own offensive biological warfare program, which was monitored for decades. The Soviets developed anthrax, tularemia, plague, cholera and asbotulinum toxin, enterotoxins and mycotoxins for biological warfare purposes.”193 More on AIDS from the Paul/Carto newsletters: AIDSomania The tactics of the homosexual lobby seem to get more extreme by the day. Recently, a group invaded Catholic services at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City and proceeded to shriek, sound air horns, lie down in the aisles, desecrate the Eucharist, toss condoms, wave sacrilegious drawings of Jesus Christ, and handcuff themselves to the pews. Meanwhile, thousands more screamed outside. I’m not Catholic, but even aside from the violations of private property involved, I find this morally outrageous. The demonstrations were organized by ACT UP: the Aids Coalition To Unleash Power because the Catholic Church has lobbied against homosexual 193
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI propaganda in the public schools. Victor Mendolia, spokesman for ACT UP, calls lobbying against such programs “criminal.” That is the correct description for his organization, of course. A well-known Libertarian editor just back from New York told me: “The ACT-UP slogan, on stickers plastered all over Manhattan, is ‘Silence = Death.’ But shouldn’t it be ‘Sodomy = Death’?” Meanwhile, speaking of acting up, my former church, the Episcopal, has just ordained its first openly gay priest. “I’m floating on air,” said the Rev. J. Robert Williams. Among the people attending the ordination in Newark, New Jersey – conducted by liberal Bishop John Shelby Spong – were James Skelly, Williams’s live-in companion. President Paul would pass a law making membership in gay organizations a criminal offense and he would do everything in his power to prevent gays from being ordained as ministers. President Paul could base this legislation on the alleged contagiousness of AIDS.
Caring for the AIDS patient The government tells us that AIDS cannot be transmitted "casually." The government also tells us that it should raise our taxes, and risk our sons for Saudi Arabia. Recently, a non-government physician writing in Gene Antonio's Healthwatch Report (P. O. Box 90140-264 Arlington, TX 76004, $25 a year) gave some excellent advice "To Those Caring for the AIDS Patient." 275
A. J. WEBERMAN 1. Wear rubber gloves when handling the clothes, dishes, etc. of the patient. 2. Use paper plates and cups and burn them afterwards. 3. Boil all his laundry for at least 15 minutes. 4. Pour a half cup of Clorox in his bath water before draining it. 5. Always wipe the toilet seat with a soapy paper towel. Do not put the towel in the toilet, but in a paper bag to be burned. 6. No kissing, since AIDS can be transmitted by saliva. 7. No sexual relations, since condoms are far from foolproof. 8. Do not allow the patient to eat in a restaurant. 9. Do not allow the patient to drive or operate machinery due to mental impairment. How often are these sorts of commonsense precautions taken? Not often, because they violate the government propaganda line, and would be considered a hate crime. But they give us an idea of how we should actually proceed, instead of having tax-funded programs to promote the conduct that causes AIDS. Another newsletter warned that “the AIDS patient” should not be allowed to eat in restaurants because “AIDS can be transmitted by saliva,” a strange claim for a physician to make. Paul told Congress AIDS in a “politically correct disease” 276
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Think of what it would mean if we followed this simple logic and implemented a Federal social program, similar to the current war on smoking, designed to reduce the spread of AIDS within the gay community. Astoundingly, we have done the opposite by making AIDS a politically correct disease. There was certainly a different attitude a hundred years ago regarding those with sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis compared to the special status given AIDS victims today.194 According to Paul we have to treat people with AIDS like lepers. If President Paul acted on these crackpot theories he could have gays quarantined so that AIDS, which his Surgeon General found to be highly contagious, could be eradicated. Gays would be granted “special status” Sonderbehandlung (“special treatment”) which in the language of the Nazis would mean execution,
LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS? You want to get rid of drug crime in this country? Fine, let's just get rid of all the drug laws. - Ron Paul (at the 2011 CNN Republican presidential debate). President Paul would legalize all recreational drugs. Repealing laws against drugs, however, would require Congressional approval which would be highly unlikely. What President Paul could do would be to order his FBI Director not to enforce drug laws and order his Attorney General not to prosecute violations of these laws. This would be a violation of the law in itself. He could, however, order his FBI Director to give these laws less priority. But this has already taken place. In 1999 there were a total of 28,192 FBI employees: 194
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=510&Itemid=60
A. J. WEBERMAN 11,646 agents and 16,546 support staff. In September 2002, 900 new agents were hired. The Counter Terrorism Division was expanded, adding 14 new “sections” and “units” specializing in trying to combat terrorism. Five hundred and eighteen agents were reassigned to counter-Islamist operations from within the agency. Of them, 400 came from the anti-drug crimes division, 59 were shifted from white-collar crime divisions and another 59 were transferred from the violent crime-fighting sections. Indeed, the FBI has transferred even more agent positions than it originally announced and has augmented those agents with the short-term assignment of additional field agents from drug and other law enforcement areas to work on counterterrorism. Before leaving office former United States Attorney General John Ashcroft said American law enforcement agencies have now created a “most wanted list” of 54 drug organizations that must be toppled here and abroad, and this is what they will focus on. After the September 11th attack the number of agents working narcotics cases dropped 45%, bank fraud cases dropped 31% and bank robbery investigations dropped 25%. As would be expected, the number of newly opened drug cases has fallen in relation to the decline in the number of field agent positions allocated to drug enforcement. So, aside from raiding pot dispensaries throughout the country, the FBI is concentrating on fighting the drug gangs and cartels. If President Paul took the FBI heat off these criminal organizations and ordered his Attorney General not to prosecute them under RICO at the same time drugs were still illegal under State law the Mexican Cartels would have a field day and over-run this country turning it into Little Mexico. How can State Governments fight international or even interstate drug cartels? The argument which springs from the criticism of a federalized criminal code and a federal police force is that states may be less effective than a centralized federal government in dealing with those who leave 278
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI one state jurisdiction for another. Fortunately, the Constitution provides for the procedural means for preserving the integrity of state sovereignty over those issues delegated to it via the tenth amendment. The privilege and immunities clause as well as full faith and credit clause allow states to exact judgments from those who violate their state laws. The Constitution even allows the federal government to legislatively preserve the procedural mechanisms which allow states to enforce their substantive laws without the federal government imposing its substantive edicts on the states. Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 makes provision for the rendition of fugitives from one state to another. While not selfenacting, in 1783 Congress passed an act which did exactly this. There is, of course, a cost imposed upon states in working with one another rather than relying on a national, unified police force. At the same time, there is a greater cost to state autonomy and individual liberty from centralization of police power.195 None-the-less Paulbots believe he would make the southern border safer by advocating an end to the federal War on Drugs. ABOLISH THE DEA Paul, who voted against a bill honoring the Drug Enforcement Administration would stop the DEA from actively pursuing drug producers, distributors, and purchasers by dissolving it in its entirety because he believes the DEA is an illegal entity: The IRS and the DEA, with powers illegally given them by the Congress and the courts, have prompted a flood of seizures and forfeitures in the last several decades without due process and frequently without 195
. Congressional Record, V. 152, Pt. 15, September 26, 2006 to September 28, 2006 Pge 19834
A. J. WEBERMAN search warrants or probable cause. Victims then are required to prove themselves innocent to recover the goods seized.196 The DEA was created with an executive order (much like FEMA and the EPA). If President Paul wanted to end the federal war on drugs, he could end the DEA. He would not need permission from congress to shut it down. Any department that was created with an executive order can be abolished without congressional approval. All the President Paul needs to do is sign his name and America will become lawless Mexico because state law enforcement would be unable to cope with the Mexican drug cartels that would overrun America.
PAULâ€™S HIDDEN AGENDA IS TO KILL BLACKS: HEROIN Cannabis is not a drug its toxicity is too low. It is a herb that will get you about as high as a cup of coffee will. As far as drugs go there are good drugs and bad drugs. Hard, toxic drugs are a dangerous shortcut to happiness. They cause euphoria, happiness unwarranted by external circumstance, however they can kill, they can induce psychopathic activity and you can get seriously addicted to them and commit crimes to obtain them. If they were legal a lot of discontented poor and mentally weak people will turn to them. There would be massive crack and heroin addiction in the black ghetto community. It is easy to overdose on heroin so assuming it was legal so there would also be numerous deaths of African-Americans. This would suit the racist Ron Paul just fine. That is why Paul wants no drug enforcement on a federal level and says he would leave it up to the states to decide which drug should be legalized. What state is going to legalize heroin? If one state did decide to legalize heroin junkies from the 196
. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 94
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI other states will move there or go there to cop. Can you imagine a state where the majority of citizens are junkies? Would the state flower be an opium poppy? So this is really nonsensical and aimed at people who want to believe anything. Paul made his position on heroin clear during a presidential debate: Q: You say that the federal government should stay out of people's personal habits, including marijuana, cocaine, even heroin. A: It's an issue of protecting liberty across the board. If you have the inconsistency, then you're really not defending liberty. We want freedom [including] when it comes to our personal habits. Q: Are you suggesting that heroin and prostitution are an exercise of liberty? A: Yes, in essence, if we leave it to the states. For over 100 years, they were legal. You're implying if we legalize heroin tomorrow, everyone's gonna use heroin. How many people here are going to use heroin if it were legal? I bet nobody! "Oh yeah, I need the government to take care of me. I don't want to use heroin, so I need these laws!"197 Paul was not addressing the Crypts or the Bloods nor a group of ghetto youth with little opportunity (who wouldn’t admit to wanting to cop some heroin anyway), he was addressing a group of well off white people who had come to hear a Presidential debate. Paul claims he does not believe that heroin is bad drug and has stated: A hundred years ago, a pharmacist openly advertised, “Heroin clears the complexion, gives 197
A. J. WEBERMAN buoyancy to the mind, regulates the stomach and the bowels and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health.” Obviously this is overstated as a medical panacea, but it describes what it was like not to have hysterical busybodies undermine our Constitution and waste billions of dollars on a drug war serving no useful purpose. This country needs to wake up! We should have more confidence in citizens making their own decisions, and decide once again to repeal federal prohibition, while permitting regulation by the states alone.198 President Paul would give the American people the right to destroy themselves with something he himself considers “bad stuff.” This throws some light on the real reason he wants all drugs legalized – to further mess up the lives of people who use them. Evidence of this can be found in Paul’s opposition to free needle exchange and his support of legislation banning it. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. It makes no sense to pay somebody, pay for free needles to do something that is currently illegal. It is very questionable whether it will do any good. As a physician, I would have to agree with the opposition that a clean needle certainly is better than a dirty needle. I do not think there is a question about that. But I do believe that there is a message sent that if we provide free needles to do something that we are condoning or encouraging it. But there is also a strong moral as well as an economic argument against this. What we are talking about here is lowering costs of risky behavior. We are saying that we will pay for the needles to perform this risky behavior. But there is another much larger element that has not been discussed so far, and that has to 198
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=249&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI do with the concept that all risky behavior be socialized; that is, through the medical system, it is assumed that those who do not participate in risky behavior must pay for the costs of the risky behavior, whether it has to do with cigarettes or whether it has to do with drugs or whether it has to do with any kind of safety. So, therefore, the argument is that we have to save money in medical care costs by providing free needles. But there is another position, and that is that we might suggest that we do not pay for free needles and we might even challenge the concept that we should not be paying people and taking care of them for risky behavior, whether it is risky sexual behavior or risky behavior with drugs. I think this is very clearly the problem, and I do not believe we should be socializing this behavior because, if we do, we actually increase it. If we lower the cost of anything, we increase the incidence of its use. So if the responsibility does not fall on the individual performing dangerous behavior, they are more likely to, and this is just part of it, the idea that we would give them a free needle. But there is a moral argument against this as well. Why should people who do not use drugs or do not participate in dangerous sexual procedures and activities have to pay for those who do? And this is really the question, and there is no correct moral argument for this. And the economic argument is very powerful. It says that if we lower the cost, we will increase this behavior. So this concept has to be dealt with if we are ever to get to the bottom of this. So, Mr. Speaker, I strongly support this legislation.199 Paul wants addicts punished for their risky behavior by letting them get AIDS and Hepatitis. He argues that if the junkies have to pay for their set of works they might kick junk because it is just too 199
A. J. WEBERMAN gosh darn expensive with a family to feed and all. This makes no sense. The reason he supported this bill was to wreak further havoc on the Black community. COCAINE AND CRACK Paulâ€™s hidden agenda comes more into focus after reading the newsletter below:
Ron Paul is arguing in favor of crack. He says that crack will not cause psychosis and that the proof is that Marion Barry, Mayor of Washington, D.C. used crack when he was in office and continued to function. Of course Marion Barry did not live in the projects on welfare nor did he live on the streets. The truth is crack is an addictive drug that produces numerous psychiatric symptoms, syndromes, and disorders. The symptoms include agitation, paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, violence, as well as suicidal and homicidal thinking. They can be primary to the drug's effect or secondary to exacerbation of co-morbid psychiatric disorders. Cocaine use during pregnancy can increase the complications of pregnancy and affect the fetus directly. These crack heads may also use other drugs, alcohol, and nicotine, which adversely affect the pregnancy as well. They have an increased rate of miscarriages and placenta abruption, in which the placenta separates from the wall of the uterus and results in stillbirth. There is increasing information 284
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI that cocaine may cause birth defects with increased rates in fetal death rates, malformation, low birth weights, and behavioral abnormalities. Paul’s hidden agenda here is that Blacks will go crazy or be stillborn if crack is legalized. Paul is well aware that a number of ominous trends emerged in the black community in the mid-1980s due to crack cocaine. Between 1984 and 1994, the homicide rate for black males aged 14 to 17 more than doubled, and the homicide rate for black males aged 18 to 24 increased nearly as much. During this period, the black community also experienced an increase weapons arrests and the number of children in foster care. Paul goes on to say the fear of crack is similar to the unwarranted fear of pot in the 1930’s when one cannot equate the two. Paul thought cocaine was pretty cool too! One hundred years ago, you could buy cocaine in a drugstore. Most Americans would be tremendously surprised to realize that for most of our history drugs were not illegal. The first marijuana law was in 1938. And they got around that on the constitutional aspect by just putting a tax on it. So there is a lack of respect for how we solve our problems, a lack of wisdom on what we ought to do, and a lack of concern; and this is my deep concern as a physician, a lack of concern for seeing people dying and suffering.200 One hundred years ago there were no gangbangers getting coked up and dropping hammers on each other and on anyone else in the Black community caught in the crossfire. Come on, we know from Paul’s newsletters that he is aware of Black crime and the role drugs play in it. Then Paul expects us to believe that it is his concern for “seeing people dying and suffering” that motivates him rather than exactly the opposite.
A. J. WEBERMAN President Paul would free non-violent federal drug offenders. In addressing Res. 412 Honoring Men And Women Of The Drug Enforcement Administration on March 3, 2004 Paul stated: And then if we look at the prison system, we have created a monstrosity. Eighty-four percent, according to one study, 84 percent of all Federal prisoners are nonviolent drug prisoners. They go in and they come out violent. We are still talking about a medical problem. We treat alcoholism as a medical problem, but anybody who smokes a marijuana cigarette or sells something, we want to put them in prison. I think it is time to stop and reevaluate this.201 If you end up in Federal Prison for drugs, it is not just for selling a bag or two of heroin. There is a myth in this country that U.S. prisons are filled with non-violent drug users. This assertion is simply not true. Actually, only 5 percent of inmates in federal prison on drug charges are incarcerated for drug possession. Most cases of simple drug possession are simply not prosecuted, unless people have been arrested repeatedly for using drugs. In 1999, for example, only 2.5 percent of the federal cases argued in District Courts involved simple drug possession. Even the small number of possession charges is likely to give an inflated impression of the numbers. It is likely that a significant percentage of those in prison on possession charges were people who were originally arrested for trafficking or another more serious drug crime but plea-bargained down to a simple possession charge. 202 â€œNon violent drug userâ€? can also mean heroin and crack dealers who did not get caught with their weapons. These evil merchants of death and destruction will be put back in the Black and Hispanic communities to deal their drugs again. Paul just wants them free, not on probation or parole. 201
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul also wants to turn gangs loose in the ghetto. On May 11, 2005 he voted against the Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act: Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, the Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act, (H.R. 1279), is the latest example of Congress disregarding its constitutional limitations in the name of “getting tough on crime.” Gang crime is certainly a serious issue in many parts of the country. However, unless criminal gangs are engaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy, the federal government has no jurisdiction over the criminal activities of gangs. In fact, by creating new federal crimes related to gang activities, but unrelated to one of the federal crimes enumerated in the Constitution, the new federal crimes and enhanced penalties in this bill usurp state and local authority. Finally, I must oppose this bill because it expands the Federal death penalty. While I recognize that nothing in the Constitution forbids Federal, State, or local governments from imposing a death penalty, I have come to the conclusion that a consistent prolife position requires opposition to any legislation imposing a Federal death penalty for unconstitutional Federal crimes. Mr. Speaker, I do not advocate Federal action to stop individual States from imposing a death penalty, I simply oppose compounding the damage done by creating new Federal crimes by making those crimes subject to a Federal death penalty. H.R. 1279 exceeds Congress’s constitutional authority by creating new Federal crimes, thus further burdening the already overwhelmed Federal judiciary system and taking another step toward upending our constitutional system by turning the States into administrative districts of the Federal Government. This bill also creates unwise mandatory minimum sentences, 287
A. J. WEBERMAN usurping the sentencing decisions of judges and juries. Finally, H.R. 1279 raises serious moral issues by expanding the use of the Federal death penalty. Therefore, I must oppose H.R. 1279 and urge my colleagues to do same.203 Paul defended doctors who ran practices where drugs like oxycontin were promiscuously prescribed to pill head patients: Doctors are even being punished for the misdeeds of their patients. For example, Dr. James Graves was sentenced to more than 60 years for manslaughter because several of his patients overdosed on various combinations of pain medications and other drugs, including illegal street drugs. As a physician with over thirty years experience in private practice, I find it outrageous that a physician would be held criminally liable for a patient’s misuse of medicine.204 Florida Assistant State Attorney Russ Edgar stated that Dr. Graves was fully aware that his patients were abusing the drugs, and that a trip to the 55-year-old doctor's office was a veritable "tailgate party" for such abusers. By running a "prescription mill," the doctor was making $500,000 a year, Edgar argued in court. So much for Paul’s expertise in law enforcement. So if you take President Paul’s desire to see heroin and crack legalized and put it together will his support of the racist pigs David Duke and Jarrod Taylor and opposition to a clean needle program perhaps you can really figure out where Paul is coming from. The most bizarre part of Paul’s promise to legalize drugs lies is his contention that FDR was responsible for marijuana prohibition: But prohibition, obviously, when they passed that amendment to the Constitution, recognized that the 203
. http://votesmart.org/public-statement/97395/gang-deterrence-andcommunity-protection-act-of-2005 204 . http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul157.html
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Congress could not pass laws. And like I mentioned in 1937, when Roosevelt decided that we should attack medical marijuana, that he would do it through raising taxes. So it is only in recent history that we have decided that this is a Federal project. The record is just not very clear it has been very successful.205
Herbert Hoover was president in 1937 not FDR. Most knowledgeable pot smokers know that it was the racist Republican Harry Anslinger (pictured above in the light overcoat overseeing a marihuana seizure) who convinced Congress to make pot illegal. Harry J. Anslinger quotes: “...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races.” “Marihuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing.” “There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.” Anslinger was a creation of the racist, pro-Nazi Hoover Administration as demonstrated by this chronology of his career: 205
A. J. WEBERMAN
1928 : International Congress against Alcoholism, Antwerp, Belgium
1928 : Conference to Revise Treaty with US, Ottawa, Canada
1929-1930 : Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition
1930-1962 : Commissioner of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
MEDICAL MARIJUANA Willis Carto called himself a Jeffersonian Libertarian: Paul calls himself the same thing and pretends to take a libertarian position on medical marijuana so that people won’t think that he is a Nazi. This is a lie designed to attract the many people in America who are tired of the War on Drugs. Paul is an advocate of medical marijuana only because he sees a whole lot of discontented people who are being oppressed just as Hitler saw the German’s suffering under the Weimar Republic. He is exploiting this for his own ends – he is the only pro-pot candidate who never smoked marijuana in his life. If Paul were President the only thing he could do would be to take pot off the DEA’s Schedule One list of drugs:
(1) Schedule I.— (A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse. (B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. (C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision. 290
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul co-sponsored the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act: Title: To provide for the medical use of marijuana in accordance with the laws of the various States. Summary: Transfers marijuana from schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act to schedule II of such Act. Declares that, in a State in which marijuana may be prescribed or recommended by a physician for medical use under applicable State law, no provision of the Controlled Substances Act shall prohibit or otherwise restrict: 1. The prescription or recommendation of marijuana by a physician for medical use; 2. An individual from obtaining and using marijuana from a physician's prescription or recommendation of marijuana for medical use; or 3. A pharmacy from obtaining and holding marijuana for the prescription or recommendation of marijuana by a physician for medical use under applicable State law. 4. Prohibits any provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act from prohibiting or restricting a State entity from producing or distributing marijuana for the purpose of its distribution for prescription or recommendation by a physician in a State in which marijuana may be prescribed by a physician for medical use.206 On May 11, 2011 he made this statement introducing the Industrial Hemp Farming Act, HR 1831: Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Industrial Hemp Farming Act. The Industrial Hemp Farming Act 206
A. J. WEBERMAN requires the federal government to respect state laws allowing the growing of industrial hemp. Nine States-Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Vermont, and West Virginia--allow industrial hemp production or research in accord with state laws. However, federal law is standing in the way of farmers in these states growing what may be a very profitable crop. Because of current federal law, all hemp included in products sold in the United States must be imported instead of being grown by American farmers.207 This is what attracts the legalize pot crowd to Paul and I can understand it having been one of the founders of the Legalize Pot Movement back in 1967 along with Irvin Dana Beal who is serving a long sentence for possession and distribution of pot. Many voters know others who have had to go to jail or prison as a result of the drug laws, some of whom had serious medical conditions that ingesting or smoking cannabis mitigated. The Paulbots are generally skeptical about politician’s campaign promises but are willing to take Paul at his word when it comes to pot. Another problem is that none of the other presidential candidates including Obama favor decriminalization or legalization. So Paul has co-opted a real issue that he has used to further his main agenda which is racist and genocidal in nature. Would Dr. Paul prescribe medical marijuana? Just because I favor the legalization of drugs doesn’t mean I favor using them, of course. As a physician, I know they’re bad stuff. – Ron Paul208
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1863&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI The federal war on drugs has proven costly and ineffective, while creating terrible, violent crime. But if you question policy, you are accused of being prodrug. That is preposterous. As a physician, father, and grandfather, I abhor drugs. I just know that there is a better way — through local laws, communities, churches, and families — to combat the very serious problem of drug abuse than a massive federalgovernment bureaucracy. - Ron Paul209 Paul has to walk a fine line because the people who put him in office are anti-drug: Those who favor strict drug laws should understand that federal preemption is a double-edged sword. For example, if a socially conservative state like Utah wanted to enact harsh drug policies to reflect its community standards, federal law could actually prevent the enactment of such policies. When the American people give up state and local authority over any issue, whether its marijuana, abortion, or gun control, they give up most of their power to affect policy. It’s far easier to influence, and hold accountable, state and local officials. Once the federal government takes the opposite side of an issue, however, good luck changing things.210 This is nonsense. The Federal Government could not prevent New York State from passing the Rockefeller Drug Laws and who says that the federal government would be motivated in that direction? PAUL WOULD DESTROY THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY 208
. http://italkyoubored.wordpress.com/2011/12/19/the-ron-paulnewsletters-ron-paul-paper-trail-ron-paul-political-report-january-1990/ 209 . http://vote-usa.org/issue.aspx? election=us20121106ar&office=uspresident&issue=busillegaldrugs 210 . http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul96.html
A. J. WEBERMAN Since President Ron Paul the “constitutionalist” opposes separation of powers America under President Paul would soon become a dictatorship: Tell Congress to pass H.R. 958! Congress has the authority under Articles I, III and IV of the Constitution of the United States to set limits on the Supreme Court and lower federal courts in order to correct abuses of judicial power and continuing violations of the Constitution by federal courts. We the People Act (H.R. 958) says the “The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court” may not adjudicate any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion; any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and that a violation by a justice or a judge of any of the provisions of the Act shall be an impeachable offense, and a material breach of good behavior subject to removal by the President of the United States according to rules and procedures established by the Congress.211 The United States Constitution Section 1 - Judicial powers – reads: The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the 211
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. So one can only assume that Ron Paul will deem the decisions that he does not like as bad behavior and fire the Justices who rendered them. Paul is no constitutionalist – he wants a dictatorship. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to support, and cosponsor, the Pledge Protection Act (HR 2028), which restricts federal court jurisdiction over the question of whether the phrase “under God” should be included in the pledge of allegiance. Local schools should determine for themselves whether or not students should say “under God” in the pledge. The case finding it is a violation of the First Amendment to include the words “under God” in the pledge is yet another example of federal judges abusing their power by usurping state and local governments’ authority over matters such as education. Congress has the constitutional authority to rein in the federal courts’ jurisdiction and the duty to preserve the states’ republican forms of governments. Since government by the federal judiciary undermines the states’ republican governments, Congress has a duty to rein in rogue federal judges. I am pleased to see Congress exercise its authority to protect the states from an out-of-control judiciary. While I will support this bill even if the language removing the United States Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over cases regarding the pledge is eliminated, I am troubled that some of my colleagues question whether Congress has the authority to limit Supreme Court jurisdiction in this case. Both the clear language of the United States Constitution and a long line of legal 295
A. J. WEBERMAN precedents make it clear that Congress has the authority to limit the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. The Framers intended Congress to use the power to limit jurisdiction as a check on all federal judges, including Supreme Court judges , who, after all, have lifetime tenure and are thus unaccountable to the people.212 This is a very slippery slope. If Congress were able to limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over cases with which it had problems with this would be a first step in destroying the separation of powers clause in the United States Constitution. The Separation of Powers devised by the framers of the Constitution was designed to do one primary thing: to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist. Based on their experience, the framers shied away from giving any branch of the new government too much power. The separation of powers provides a system of shared power known as Checks and Balances. Three branches are created in the Constitution. The Legislative, composed of the House and Senate. The Executive, composed of the President, Vice-President, and the Departments. The Judicial, composed of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. Each of these branches has certain powers, and each of these powers is limited, or checked, by another branch. Paul stated: “The Founders recognized that one of the chief dangers to liberty was the concentration of power in a few hands, which is why they carefully divided power among the three branches.” But the Nazi Paul wants to throw a monkey wrench into this balance of power and pave the way for a dictatorship in America. When it suits Paul’s hidden agenda he flushes the constitution right down the toilet. PAUL WOULD PREVENT THE SUPREME COURT FROM RULING ON MATTERS INVOLVING THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 212
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=228&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI In an 1802 letter to the Danbury (Conn.) Baptist Association, Thomas Jefferson, then president, declared that the American people through the First Amendment had erected a "wall of separation between church and state." Paul, who calls himself a Jeffersonian, wants to force the judiciary into breaking down that wall: In recent years, we have seen numerous abuses of power by Federal courts. Federal judges regularly strike down state and local laws on subjects such as religious liberty, sexual orientation, family relations, education, and abortion. This government by Federal judiciary causes a virtual nullification of the Tenth Amendment’s limitations on federal power. Furthermore, when federal judges impose their preferred polices on state and local governments, instead of respecting the policies adopted by those elected by, and thus accountable to, the people, republican government is threatened. Article IV, section 4 of the United States Constitution guarantees each state a republican form of government. Thus, Congress must act when the executive or judicial branch threatens the republican governments of the individual states. Therefore, Congress has a responsibility to stop Federal judges from running roughshod over state and local laws. The Founders would certainly have supported congressional action to reign in Federal judges who tell citizens where they can and can’t place manger scenes at Christmas.213 The founding fathers did not mention God in the Constitution, and the faithful often regarded our early presidents as insufficiently pious. George Washington was a nominal Anglican who rarely stayed for Communion. John Adams was a Unitarian, which 213
. Congressional Record, V. 153, Pt. 1, January 4, 2007 to January 17, 2007 page 374
A. J. WEBERMAN Trinitarians abhorred as heresy. Thomas Jefferson, denounced as an atheist, was actually a deist who detested organized religion and who produced an expurgated version of the New Testament with the miracles eliminated. Jefferson and James Madison, a nominal Episcopalian, were the architects of the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom. Paul wants America to move closer to Republic and farther away from democracy. In a tirade to Congress entitled A Wise Consistency on February 11, 2004 Paul proclaimed: We should give up our obsession with democracy, both for ourselves and others, since the dictatorship of the majority is just as destructive to a minority, especially individual liberty. Paul also wants to strip power from the executive branch: Paul was the sponsor of H.R. 2655, the Separation of Powers Restoration Act. His legislation would terminate all existing states of national emergency and remove from the executive any power to declare national emergencies; vest power in Congress alone to declare states of national emergencies; restrict presidential power to issue executive orders by denying them any force of law except as provided for by Congress; and repeal the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which, Paul noted, granted broad war-making authority to the president. This would make it more difficult to dispatch America troops to Israel and would throw the balance of power between the President, the Commander and Chief, and Congress out of whack. BRING HOME THE TROOPS? Ron Paul is immensely popular among the war-weary Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. This is because they would much rather be in a peacetime army. Hitler was also popular among the war-weary veterans of World War I. They participated in riots against the Jews and Communists and made up the majority of the members of the S.A. the Stormtroopers. Paul stated: 298
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI The elimination of Osama bin Laden should now prompt us to bring our troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq. Al Qaeda was never in Iraq and we were supposedly in Afghanistan to get Osama bin Laden. With bin Laden gone, there is no reason for our presence in the region – unless indeed it was all about oil, nation-building, and remaking the Middle East and Central Asia. – Ron Paul214 President Ron Paul would bring back approximately 310,000 Active Duty personnel from overseas where they can join the more than one million troops stationed in the United States not counting the Reserves? What are they going to do in the United States? Will they rebuild the infrastructure? Nope that would be socialism. Will they collect their usual paychecks? Paul: We don't need to pay all this money to keep troops all over the country, 130 countries, 900 bases. But also, just think, bringing all the troops home rather rapidly, they would be spending their money here at home and not in Germany and Japan and South Korea, tremendous boost to the economy.215 Paul is counting Marine guards and military attaches as part of a vast expanse of U.S. military power around the globe. But only 11 countries actually house more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel. Guess Paul never heard of armed forces personnel spending their money at a PX and living in base housing when they are stationed overseas? Bringing home the troops may cost taxpayers less but in the long run they will get much less security for their money, less bang for the buck. What good will the armed forces do in US? Defend our borders from foreign invasion? Become Storm Troopers at the beck and call of their Commander and Chief, Herr President Ron Paul? If Paul ends welfare, unemployment insurance, 214
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=1860&Itemid=69 215
A. J. WEBERMAN Medicaid, Medicare, and allows U.S. States to bring back segregation, abolishes the FDIC and Fed he will need more than the National Guard to suppress an internal rebellion. Okay all the troops return: Will we build more bases to house them? Will they have to purchase home mortgages or pay rent? Will this really stimulate the American economy as Paul claims? Will they eventually get discharged from the Army and into the private sector in order to save even more money? They will be a drain on the economy not a boom as their military training is not always applicable to civilian life. Many would end up homeless, on the streets. RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE THE FEDERAL LAWS AGAINST CHILD PROSTITUTION As a logical consequence stemming from his belief that there are only three federal crimes, and assuming Paul really believes it, Ron Paul would do away with the federal laws against prostitution. Here are the laws he would ask Congress to revoke: 1) MANN ACT - Only applies if someone pays the travel costs like an airline ticket and crosses state lines for the purpose of prostitution. It is very rare for the Feds to go after folks under the Mann Act and usually no one is paying directly for transportation. The law was originally referred to as the “White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910” and prohibited white slavery. It also banned the interstate transport of females for “immoral purposes.” Its primary stated intent was to address prostitution, immorality, and human trafficking. The act is better known as the Mann Act, after James Robert Mann, an American lawmaker. 2) TRAVEL ACT – The Federal racketeering laws contain a provision, much loved by prosecutors, commonly known as the “Travel Act” — and more formally as “Interstate and foreign travel or 300
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises.” The Travel Act makes it a crime to travel in interstate commerce with the intention of, among other things, promoting, conducting or distributing the proceeds of unlawful activity (expressly including prostitution), if, after the travel, such an illegal activity is performed. It would, for example, be a felony violation of the Travel Act (punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment), to travel across state lines (or aid and abet a prostitute in doing so) for the purpose of promoting or carrying on the business of a prostitution ring; it would, similarly (and separately), violate the Travel Act to send the prostitute back across state lines to distribute the proceeds of the prostitution. 3) The PROTECT ACT specifically implemented several amendments in connection with sex tourism and commercial sexual exploitation: (1) in the area of sex tourism, new provision 2423© makes it sufficient to show that a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident traveled abroad and engaged in any illicit sexual conduct with a minor, regardless of what his intentions may have been when he left the United States; (2) the addition of 2423(d) specifically reaches any person who knowingly “arranges, induces, procures, or facilitates the travel” of an individual they know is traveling for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, when they engage in facilitating the travel for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain; (3) new provision 2423(e) punishes an attempt or conspiracy to violate any of the provisions in 2423; (4) the definitions contained in 2423(f) broaden the prohibited conduct under the statute to include commercial sex acts (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591©(1)) with persons under 18; and (5) for defendants charged under the sex tourism provision, 2423© an affirmative defense was 301
A. J. WEBERMAN added for defendant who “reasonably believed” that person who had engaged in the commercial sex act was 18. The defendant bears the burden of proving the affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence. The PROTECT ACT also changed the sentencing scheme for 18 U.S.C. § 2423. For 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a)(traveling for criminal sex act) the maximum sentence was upgraded to 30 years imprisonment. Formerly, the equivalent provision had a maximum sentence of 15 years. A mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years was also enacted. In the revision to section 2423(b), the maximum sentence was also upgraded from 15 to 30 years imprisonment. Paul voted against a bill congratulating the Government of South Africa upon its first two successful convictions for human trafficking. How are state governments going to fight international human traffickers? Human trafficking involves an act of recruiting, transporting, transferring, harboring or receiving a person through a use of force, coercion or other means, for the purpose of exploiting them. Is this what liberty means to Ron Paul, the right to exploit other human beings? Where do Ron Paul’s freedom end and other people’s rights begin? RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE ALL FEDERAL LAWS AGAINST PORNOGRAPHY We are bound and determined to write more rules and regulations dealing with the first and the second amendment, and I do not see this as a good trend. It is said today that those who want to undermine the first amendment, that it is already established that pornography is not protected under the first amendment. And today the goal is to make sure that the depiction of violence is not protected under the first amendment. But do my colleagues know that the 302
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI major cause of violence in the world throughout history have been abuse of religion and the abuse of philosophy? So, therefore, the next step will be, if we can limit the depiction of pornography and then violence, be the limitation of the depiction of a philosophy that deals with religion or political systems such as Communism or other fascism.216 RON PAUL WOULD REVOKE ALL FEDERAL LAWS AGAINST VIRTUAL CHILD PORNOGRAPHY Paul voted against requiring operators of wi-fi networks who discover the transmission of child porn and other forms online sex predation to report it to the government.217 Ron Paul defended his stand in these words: Mr. Speaker, as a parent, grandparent and OB-GYN who has had the privilege of delivering over 4,000 babies, I share the revulsion of all decent people at child pornography. Those who would destroy the innocence of children by using them in sexuallyexplicit material deserve the harshest punishment. However, the Child Obscenity and Pornography Prevention Act (HR 4623) exceeds Congress’ constitutional power and does nothing to protect any child from being abused and exploited by pornographers. Instead, HR 4623 redirects law enforcement resources to investigations and prosecutions of “virtual” pornography which, by definition, do not involve the abuse or exploitation of children. Therefore, HR 4623 may reduce law
. Josh Harkinson, Ron Paul's 15 Most Extreme Positions, Mother Jones, May 16, 2011
A. J. WEBERMAN enforcementâ€™s ability to investigate and prosecute legitimate cases of child pornography. Legislation outlawing virtual pornography is, to say the least, of dubious constitutionality. The constitution grants the federal government jurisdiction over only three crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is hard to stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, or piracy to cover sending obscene or pornographic materials over the Internet. Therefore, Congress should leave the issue of whether or not to regulate or outlaw virtual pornography to states and local governments. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my colleagues' revulsion at child pornography, I do not believe that this justifies expanding the federal police state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images not containing actual children. I am further concerned by the possibility that passage of HR 4623 will divert law enforcement resources away from the prosecution of actual child pornography. HR 4623 also represents another step toward the nationalization of all police functions, a dangerous trend that will undermine both effective law enforcement and constitutional government. It is for these reasons that I must oppose this wellintentioned but fundamentally flawed bill. (Ron Paul June 26, 2002).218 Here is one of the laws that President Paul would try to get Congress to revoke or order the Justice Department and the FBI to give low priority to: 8 U.S.C. Â§ 1466A (2008) 218
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI § 1466A. OBSCENE VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN (a) In general. Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that-(1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and (B) is obscene; or (2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1) [18 USCS § 2252A(b)(1)], including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction. Child pornography is an international problem and there is no way it can be dealt with by local and state police departments. State and local governments cannot make arrests overseas nor have their liaisons overseas make arrests. Under a Ron Paul presidency Dreamboard, referenced below would still be in operation and Michael Childs, 49, of Huntsville, Alabama, (photo on the left) who sentenced to 30 years in prison, and others like him, would be on the street. WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holder announced today the unsealing of three indictments 305
A. J. WEBERMAN and one complaint charging a total of 72 individuals for their participation in an international criminal network dedicated to the sexual abuse of children and the creation and dissemination of graphic images and videos of child sexual abuse throughout the world. Operation Delego, an ongoing investigation that was launched in December 2009, targeted the 72 charged defendants and more than 500 additional individuals around the world for their participation in Dreamboard – a private, members-only, online bulletin board that was created and operated to promote pedophilia and encourage the sexual abuse of very young children, in an environment designed to avoid law enforcement detection. To date, 52 of the 72 charged defendants have been arrested in the United States and abroad. Members traded graphic images and videos of adults molesting children 12 years-old and under, often violently, and collectively created a massive private library of images of child sexual abuse.219 RON PAUL WOULD REPEAL ALL FEDERAL AGE OF CONSENT LAWS EXCEPT ONE Ron Paul has stated that there should be no “age of consent law” in the federal statutes. But his newsletter espouses a different view in cases where Black youth is involved: We don’t think a child of 13 should be held as responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult, and should be treated as such.
Aside from this Paul said that it should be OK by federal law for a 24 year old man to convince a 10 year old boy or girl to have sex. 219
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI When pressed on this issue and other similar issues, Paul said that the states should have no such laws either! So far we have legalized prostitution and drugs on a federal level. What if the States followed suit? A twelve year old girl should be able to live with a pimp, sell her body, and use the proceeds to purchase heroin (after her pimp takes a percentage, that is). Paul told Congress: Mr. Chairman, I rise today in opposition to the Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998. This bill, if passed, will further expand the authority of this country’s national police force and further “justify” the federal Justice Department’s intrusion into mail, telephone and Internet communications.220 In a one minute twenty-four second interview with Peter Zottolo shown on YOUTUBE221, Ron Paul says he supports NAMBLA and so does the constitution. Nov 29, 2007
COMMENT: Some jackass got pwnd when his joke backfired. Don't know what NAMBLA is? It’s The North American Man / Boy Love 220
. http://videosift.com/video/Does-Ron-Paul-Support-NAMBLA-Well-yesand-no http://digg.com/news/story/Ron_Paul_interview_Paul_supports_NAMBLA
A. J. WEBERMAN Association. Yeah, something tells me Ron Paul wont like that. On March 14, 2002 Paul voted against the Federal Penalties for Child Sexual Abuse Act: The bill before us today simply expands Federal penalties for already existing Federal crimes, and does not in any way infringe on the jurisdiction of the States. However, Mr. Chairman, I would ask my colleagues to consider whether child sexual abuse should be a Federal crime at all. The Constitution specifies three Federal crimes, namely treason, piracy, and counterfeiting. It is a stretch, to say the least, to define child abuse as a form of treason, piracy, or counterfeiting. Therefore, perhaps the best means of dealing with child sexual abuse occurring on Federal lands across State lines is to turn the suspected perpetrator over to the relevant local jurisdiction and allow the local authorities to prosecute the crime. In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, while I believe this is a worthy piece of legislation, I hope someday we will debate whether expanding Federal crimes (along with the use of congressionally mandated mandatory minimum sentences) is consistent with constitutional government and fundamental principles of justice.222 WOMANâ€™S RIGHTS There would be no federal sexual harassment laws under a Paul presidency. In the past several months the airways have been filled with Members of Congress relating or restating their fidelity to their oath of office to uphold the 222
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Constitution. That is good, and I am sure it is done with the best of intentions. But when it comes to explaining our constitutional responsibility to make sure unconstitutional sexual harassment laws are thoroughly enforced, while disregarding most people’s instincts towards protecting privacy, it seems to be overstating a point, compared to our apathy toward the usurping of congressional power to declare and wage war. That is something we ought to be concerned about.223 Like all other drugs GHB, the date rape drug, would be legal: I have extensive experience in the clinical use of gamma hyudroxy butyric acid (GHB) . . . I have used these substances for over ten years on hundreds of patients (and have advised thousands through my books and articles on the subject). I have not had one instance reported to me of adverse effects in my patients. GHB is the safest, most nontoxic sleep inducing substance known. It has a wide range of other therapeutic uses. The therapeutic threshold for GHB is greater than almost any known pharmaceutical substance (the LD50 is40–100 times greater than the sleep-inducing therapeutic dose of 3–6 grams!). For each of the aforementioned procedural and substantive reasons, I must again oppose H.R. 2130, the Hillory J. Farias DateRape Prevention Drug Act.224 GHB is available in odorless, colorless, and tasteless form that is frequently combined with alcohol and other beverages. GHB has been used to commit sexual assaults due to its ability to sedate and incapacitate unsuspecting victims, preventing them from resisting sexual assault. 223
. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 84
A. J. WEBERMAN Paul voted against life sentences for rapists and child molesters using the same tired excuse: Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the policy behind H.R. 4679, the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act, is unobjectionable. Given the high rates of recidivism among sex criminals, it is certainly legitimate to take steps to reduce the likelihood that a paroled sex criminal will commit further crimes. In fact, given the likelihood that a sex offender will attempt to commit another sex crime, it is reasonable to ask why rapists and child molesters are not simply imprisoned for life? However, Mr. Speaker, questions of the proper punishment for sexual crimes are not issues properly under federal jurisdiction. The Constitution grants the federal government jurisdiction over only three crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is hard to stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, or piracy to include sex crimes. Therefore, even though I agree with the policy behind H.R. 4679, I must remind my colleagues that the responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and punishing sex crimes is solely that of state and local governments.225 EUTHANASIA Pain Relief Promotion Act of 1999 (H.R. 2260) 27 October 1999 Being strongly pro-life, Iâ€™m convinced that the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision of 1973 is one of the worst, if not the worst, Supreme Court ruling of the 20th century. It has been this institutionalizing into our legal system the lack of respect for life and liberty that has and will continue to play havoc with liberty and life until it is changed. It has been said by 225
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI many since the early 1970s that any legalization of abortion would put us on a slippery slope to euthanasia. I agree with this assessment.226 The intention of H.R. 2260 was to repeal the Oregon law legalizing euthanasia and make a statement against it. None-theless Paul opposed it. However, following Paul’s line of reasoning regarding the legalization of drugs if you are going to legalize these sometimes lethal drugs like heroin why not legalize various poisons like arsenic, shellfish toxin etc. to so that if you wanted to kill yourself (or someone else) you would be at liberty to do so? Additionally, this bill empowers the Attorney General to train federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel to discern the difference between palliative care and euthanasia. Most recently, though, it was the Attorney General who specifically exempted the physicians of Oregon from certain provisions of Title 21, the very Title this legislation intends to augment. Under the tutelage of the Attorney General, it would thus become the federal police officer’s role to determine at which point deaths from pain medication constitute assisted suicide.227 Just as in Roe v Wade Paul refused to federalize a crime. He did this time after time which makes me wonder why is he so closely wedded to this abstract principle that there are only three federal crimes? According to Paul “Constitutionally, there are only three federal crimes. These are treason against the United States, piracy on the high seas, and counterfeiting (and for a short period of history, the manufacture, sale, or transport of alcohol was concurrently a federal and state crime).” 226
. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November 3, 1999 page 27069 227
. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November 3, 1999 page 27098
A. J. WEBERMAN Is it worth adhering to these principles when a lack of federal criminal enforcement is bound to lead to taking the lives of the unborn and elderly and giving dope dealers, rapists, pornographers and child molesters a freer hand? Is this his guiding principle in life that there are only three federal crimes and this overrides everything else? Isnâ€™t that what the federal legislature does, make laws? ABORTION Roe vs. Wade Where To From Here? November 20, 2004 The 1973 Roe vs. Wade ruling caused great harm in two distinct ways. First, it legalized abortion at any stage, establishing clearly that the Supreme Court and the government condoned the cheapening of human life. Second, it firmly placed this crucial issue in the hands of the federal courts and national government. The federalization of abortion was endorsed even by those who opposed abortion. Instead of looking for state-by-state solutions and limiting federal court jurisdiction, those anxious to protect life came to rely on federal laws, eroding the constitutional process. The authors of the Constitution intended for criminal matters and acts of violence (except for a few rare exceptions) to be dealt with at the state level. Now, however, conservatives as well as liberals find it acceptable to nationalize issues such as abortion, marriage, prayer, and personal sexual matters â€” with more federal legislation offered as the only solution. This trend of transferring power from the states to the federal government compounds our problems â€” for when we lose, it affects all 50 states, and overriding Congress or the Supreme Court becomes far more difficult than dealing with a single state.228 228
. http://paul.house.gov/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=218&Itemid=60
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Of course the anti-abortion groups want federal legislation. Otherwise if you want an abortion all you had to do was go to state where it was legal. You could not have the State Police stopping every pregnant woman to make sure she was not on her way to another state to have an abortion. And how could the local authorities determine if someone were in the early stages of pregnancy? Would they have to carry around portable sonographic imagers? Paul’s goal is to strip the Federal Government of all its expanded powers and return to a confederacy. ANIMAL RIGHTS Now, cruelty to animals, nobody is going to come and defend cruelty to animals. But quite frankly there will be times it will be difficult to define. The motivation for most cruelty to animals is because people are sick. This is a mental illness. We are dealing with mental illness here and we are going to write a Federal law against it. So if somebody, and it was even mentioned by the proponents of this bill, that people like Ted Bundy delight in this. Yes. These people are psychopaths. They are nuts. It is an illness. We cannot pass a law to deal with mental illness. I strongly object to this approach. We should be thinking not only about the process but of the unintended consequences of passing legislation like this.229 So cruelty to animals is a treatable illness, a mental illness and not a crime. PETA might disagree. A WAVE OF VIOLENCE AGAINST JEWS Under President Paul every Jew-hating piece of crap would come out of the woodwork and feel justified attacking Jews and Jewish houses of worship, community centers etc.. Ron Paul’s mere 229
A. J. WEBERMAN candidacy incited the firebombing of two synagogues in New Jersey. Anthony Graziano threw a firebomb into the home of a rabbi in Rutherford, New Jersey and attacked a synagogue in Paramus, New Jersey. Paulbot Indian Hindu Aakash Dalal was his coconspirator. On the day of Graziano’s arrest, a letter to the editor signed by Dalal was published on the web site of the Rutgers student newspaper, the Daily Targum: As it happens, Ron Paul accurately predicted the 2007-2008 housing crisis in 2002 on the floor of the House, while others were oblivious. To empower the Federal Reserve System and to ignore Paul’s ideas would be irresponsible and illogical. Allowing the Federal Reserve to continue to exist in its current form is only rewarding failure and incompetence.230 The author was Aakash Dalal a sophomore majoring in chemistry and biological sciences. Dalal had been friends with Graziano since they both attended middle school in Lodi. Both of these two maggots joined the Rutgers University chapter of a group called the Young Americans for Liberty, which used to be known as Students for Ron Paul. Dalal who posted a picture of himself with Paul as his Facebook profile, was charged with conspiring with Graziano to commit numerous criminal acts aimed at Jews: nine counts of aggravated arson, conspiracy to commit aggravated arson, bias intimidation and criminal mischief. Dalal’s attorney, Chris DiLorenzo, said that Dalal shouldn't be considered an accessory to the synagogue bombings because the Rutgers student was on leave from college, out of state, working for Ron Paul in the New Hampshire primaries when 230
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI the attacks took place in early January. Graziano was charged with numerous counts of attempted murder. We can get a look at the Ron Paul mentality from Graziano’s Facebook page. The last post on Graziano’s Facebook page was on January 24, 2012 by Ck Rafuls. It was a link that said RONPAUL2012 but went to a story about Graziano’s arrest. Ck advised him “Don’t drop the soap Jew Killer.” On January 16, 2012 Graziano praised a black football player who said he was going to vote for Paul. Arian Foster must have thought his first name Aryan Foster. Graziano wrote “Dude, you are an inspiration for…” on Foster’s wall. On January 11, 2012 Anthony posted a logo from Bromley Pure Green Tea and wrote, DRINK IT JUST DRINK IT, GREEN TEA DAWG. ANTIOXIDANTS CLEANSE YOUR BODY FROM PREVIOUS TOXINS.” Meth? January 11, 2012 was when Graziano firebombed the Rutherford Rabbi’s home. January 8, 2012 “LIVE FREE OR DIE! RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012!” Graziano posted “RON PAUL 2012! On Jew’s Wall on January 2nd.” Jew’s wall was supposed to be pro-Jewish but was taken over by Jew haters. Graziano was responsible for an arson committed in Paramus on January 3, 2012. Graziano threw a bottle containing gasoline at the rear wall of Congregation K'Hal Adath Jeshurun, but the resulting fire burned out quickly. Graziano December 21, 2011: “Do or die. Ride or die (he rode his bike to the attacks). We’ll build and multiply. Spread the word (about Ron Paul) and salute (the new Hitler). Move without fear, you are a tiger in the field, staring at prey.” Graziano’s prey turned out to be some little Jewish children and their parents. Graziano’s dad: OK PAUL HAS MY VOTE. Kenny Feola: Ron Paul winning so far. When told that Paul was winning, Graziano wrote “Yes he is, and obviously certain “people” (certain subhuman Jews) who hang out in certain “establishments” (who are part of the power structure) aren’t too happy.” Graziano was "weeks away" from another attack because he had submitted paperwork in an attempt to buy a gun before he was arrested.
A. J. WEBERMAN
In Plano Texas,231 a "Ron Paul grassroots campaign organizer" who, FEC records show donated heavily to Ron Paul's campaign, Anson Chi , was seriously injured as a homemade bomb he was carrying (most likely to a neocon target) accidentally detonated. Anson is well known online at Ron Paul Forums232 and even developed a popular website on "How to become a delegate."233 On his talk show this week, Adam Vs The Man, Ron Pauloid Adam Kokesh read an email from a viewer which said "There is a way the nomination can be given to Ron Paul," he read aloud."There is a way to fix the situation we currently face with Obama versus Romney. Romney needs to die."234 Kokesh responded that "it sure is tempting isn't it, to think that you could take out one life and prevent the deaths of so many others." Kokesh was contacted by the Secret Service. Douglas Wright, who plotted to blow up a bridge spanning the Cuyahoga River, had Ron Paul literature in his home. Wrightâ€™s indictment read, Wright suggested getting a car that they can drive into the Federal Reserve Bank with C-4, and blow it up. Upon hearing Wright mention blowing up the Federal Reserve Bank, Baxter advised this is now higher scale, and wanted everyone to agree this was an open discussion. Baxter advised people have 231
. http://www.dallasnews.com/news/communitynews/plano/headlines/20120622-plano-bomb-case-suspect-spoke-of-needto-slay-the-head-off-in-anti-government-interview.ece 232
delegate-site-is-right-ours-or-Ansons&s=a4bcf9cd03b0fe6f8816be06312153d4 233 . http://www3.webng.com/ronpaul/becomedelegate.html 234 . http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppinsrosiegray/prominent-ronpaul-supporter-muses-about-assassination 316
RON PAUL: AMERICAâ€™S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI been attacking banks and the Federal Reserve for a long time, and the Federal Reserve has branches all over the country. The group discussed where the Federal Reserve banks were located.235 Numerous Ron Paul supporters were present at an Occupy Cleveland demonstration against the Fed.236
. http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Wright_complaint_affadavit_050112.p df 236
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI
CHAPTER ELEVEN RON PAUL’S FAREWELL SPEECH Ron Paul leaves Congress, still the pariah he always was. No legislation name after him, any office buildings or bridges. But as long as he is sentient he is a threat. Paul’s farewell speech to Congress contained the same seemingly innocuous message and there was only one interesting part: Government use of force to mold social and economic behavior at home and abroad has justified individuals using force on their own terms. The fact that violence by government is seen as morally justified, is the reason why violence will increase when the big financial crisis hits and becomes a political crisis as well. Paul hoped for a Depression scale financial crisis so he could rise to power just as Hitler did. From what part of society will the increase in violence come from? From Ron Paul’s Storm troopers. First, we recognize that individuals shouldn’t initiate violence, then we give the authority to government. Eventually, the immoral use of government violence, when things goes badly, will be used to justify an individual’s “right” to do the same thing. Neither the government nor individuals have the moral right to initiate violence against another yet we are moving toward the day when both will claim this authority. If this cycle is not reversed society will break down. When needs are pressing, conditions deteriorate and rights become relative to the demands and the whims of the majority. It’s then not a great leap for individuals to take it upon themselves to use violence to get what they claim is theirs.
RON PAUL: AMERICA’S MOST DANGEROUS NAZI Paul is making a convoluted argument for the use of violence by individuals against the government. Paul blames the government for any violence that may befall it. The Government uses violence against its citizens and so the citizens justifiably resort to violence against the Government, this is the cycle Paul referred to. Then we learn that during a time of economic crisis the majority, also known as the Federal Government will deprive people of their rights. If this happens those who are being deprived of their rights have a right to take up arms against the Federal Government. What all this boils down to is that Ron Paul is a piece of the filth that America has dredged up from its pro-Nazi and isolationist past. In his world, freedom, liberty, and the Constitution wouldn’t exist; tyranny and totalitarianism would reign. It would be the Fourth Reich. Paul’s connection with the Jew hating pathological genocidal maniacs of Liberty Lobby, his connection to the Jew hating Nazis David Duke and Don Black, his defense of Nazi war criminals and Holocaust deniers puts him a class several notches below child molesters. Many pedophiles will let their victims live, the Nazis do not.
A. J. WEBERMAN ABOUT THE AUTHOR In the early 1970’s A. J. Weberman became a widely known counter-culture figure after he went through Bob Dylan’s garbage. He coined the word “Garbology” to describe the journalistic technique of searching through trash for information and called himself a garbologist. He also invented Dylanology another word he coined – which means the study of Bob Dylan’s cryptic poetry. Weberman was the first to make the connection between Watergaters E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis and the Kennedy assassination. He was sued by E. Howard Hunt in an effort to shut him up. Hunt later confessed to his son that he was part of “the big event.” Weberman was able to depose former DCIA Richard Helms, CI/SIG head James Angleton, G. Gordon Liddy, Bernard Barker and others. Weberman worked as a researcher for Sen. Richard Schweiker, (R-Pa) and as a Congressional researcher for Cong. Henry Gonzalez (D-San Antonio, Texas). Weberman has numerous political arrests including one for having tossed a tomato at former President Nixon. Weberman, along with I. D. Beal, was the founder of the Yippie Museum, an educational institution chartered by the Board of Regents of New York State. He is the subject of an award winning movie entitled The Ballad of A. J. Weberman. His revolutionary circle included John Lennon, Yoko Ono, Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, David Peel, Tom Forcade, Aron Kay and Phil Ochs. Weberman’s other books are Coup D’Etat in America, the CIA and the Assassination of JFK co-authored by Michael Canfield, My Life In Garbology, The Dylan to English Dictionary, Homothug, The Secret Life of Rudy Giuliani, The Devil and Bob Dylan and A History of Islamist Terrorism in America. He is a Director of the Jewish Defense Organization and a non-leader of the Youth International Party.
Published on Jul 16, 2012
Ron Paul is a totally evil person with an agenda to committ genocide against the Jews and send the Blacks back to Africa.