Page 1

SD LIBRARY

2955

1070/7710/1968

PUBLIC BAKKER,-J.J

PUBLIC / TrioNt TR NSPO CALDER

KINGS WAY

• - EMA -K

III AVENUE

gLARKE STADIUM

107 AVENUE KITCHENER

GOVERNMENT CENTER

MON TON

UNIVERSIT UNIV. HOSP.

PARK ALLEN

BY SOUTHGATE

BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN TRANSIT

EBAKKER-.-aI p.

LINE

FIGURE EIGHT

4403.1a .E3 :5H4 1968


0

/


PUBLIC TPANSPOPTATION IN

EDMONTON

by

J. J. BAKKER, P.Eng.

JANUARY 1968


J. J. BAKKER, P.Eng. B.Sc., D.I.C., M.S.C.E. Transportation Engineer 25 Grosvenor Boulevard, ST. ALBEPT, Alberta Januaky 10, 1968

Mt. S. J. Hampton, P.Eng. City Commizzionet, City Hall, EDMONTON, Albetta

Dean. Sit, As tequezted I have pAepaked a AepoAt on the tole (34 Pubtic TAanspottation in Edmonton. Pubtic TAanzpoAtation cannot be expected to give a 4inanciat AetuAn it L6 atzo to pitovide a zeAvice to the public and compete with 4ub4idized pAivate tAanzpoktation. Howevet Pubtic TtanspoAtation developed with a tapid tkamit tine - can make pozzibte the pnojected high employment concentkation4 downtown, in the goveAnment centet and at the UniveAzity. Imptementation o,6 the Aecarmendationz would enable Pubtic TkanzpoAtation to zeAve the automobile, and allow it's patton4 to b '1 -pa44 ttaggc congeztion in a at and comyttable way. The Aapid tkanzit tine would atzo pAovide Aelie4 to the toad zyztem, zince theke wowed be tezz buzez and Owen_ dives uzing .thee 'toads. I hope thiz kepokt will azzizt City Council in 40/mutating poticy as tegaAds Pubtic TAanzpoAtation.

Reispectilutey 'submitted,

J. J. Bakken., P.Eng.


At,

CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE TWO

THREE

FOUR

FIVE

SIX

PAGE THE GROWTH OF EDMONTON 1 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS IT IS TODAY 3 CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN EDMONTON 7 New areas, Older areas, Central Business District, Government Center, University, Exhibition Grounds, Clarke Stadium, A domed stadium,convention center or trade center. REVIEW OF PLANE 11 M.E.T.S.,.Bechtel Plan for rapid transit,Downtown Plan, General Plan. TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS OF EDMONTON'S GROWTH TRENDS 16 Downtown, Government, University, Edmonton's opportunity, the effect on downtown parking. USEFUL EXAMPLES OF OTHER CITIES

20

Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Chicago, Skokie Swift, Toronto, GO Transit, Montreal, Expo, Fort borth. SEVEN

EIGHT

POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES FOR TEE E.T.S. 32 Do nothing approach, Automobile only, Transit only, A practical and balanced Transportation plan, Transportation organization. THE BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN 36 Roadway plan, Transit plan, The downtown tunnel, Other modifications, Schematic track plan, Equipment, Stage construction, Costs, Implications of balanced

NINE

transportation plan. RECOMMENDATIONS

44

BIBLIOGRAPHY

46


_


APPENDIX ONE TWO

Patronage predictions Cost estimates for rapid transit by Bechtel in 1963

THREE

FARE HISTORY

FOUR

TRAVEL TrIE TO DOWNTOWN

FIVE SIX

ETS Revenue and Expenditures 1940 - 1967 Recommendations of September 1965

FIGURE

47 47 48 48 49

PAGE

ONE TM THREE

POPULATION GROWTH E.T.S. REV= AND EXPENDITURES BECHTEL RAPID TRANSIT AND M.E.T.S. FREEWAYS

FOUR SIX SEVEN

CLEVELAND RAPID TRANSIT SHAKER HEIGHTS RAPID TRANSIT GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION DEPARIMENT - ORGANISATION CHART

EIGHT NINE

BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN SCHEMATIC TRACK PLAN

FIVE

PAGE 47

2 6 14 22 23 29 35 39 41


I I •

INMIto 41. 144. eittifiblowl r1 *prod CM %MAO

101

I II

'roue Amen 1 mar :WES A fil7.P1.11 10d

alip7

rmila dn IMMO TIMM 41 Mr Mr= Na"We II; Walla 11111111MIEri iffirdtpinil itirripLa9114N '4 ma newsimur min ANA gifif Mai=

II

I


CHAPTER ONE THE GROWTH OF EDMONTON

Since the start of this century the growth of Metropolitan Edmonton has been rapid and often greater than expected. The table shown below and Figure One reflect this growth and also give the present predictions up to the end of the century, only 32 years from now. Edmonton's growth is a reflection of Edmonton's economic base, it is rich in food, water, fuel and mineral resources; it has excellent inter-regional transportation, and has a growing market. On a world wide basis Edmonton still lives in a relative population vacuum. Edmonton's internal transportation has beriefited greatly from the wide right-of-ways provided by our forefathers. For the size of town that Edmonton was at the time Jasper Avenue was laid out, it might be questioned whether these wide right-of-ways were then justified. Now Edmonton again finds itself at a moment of decision in that it has to provide additional transportation facilities that will benefit the city for the next few years or for the next few generations. YEAR

1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1964 1971 1980

CITY POPULATION (includes Beverly and Jasper Place) 4,176 31,064 59,860 80,170 96,306 170,210 314,824 357,696 435,000 570,000 840,000

METRO-POPULATION (includes St.Albert, Sherwood Park and Griesbach)

330,129 382,279 479,600 643,000 1,000,000

2000 More information on this subject is given in Edmonton's General Plan.

1.


lam immasb wok mil= wit Nein mr Elm g ormiNivi 4,EtEs ir ~WM tip tdife Who I &I Ailisqg Eml rie Ammon Jim is • Iwir mob r •detwo 'romp mr[ 17101 "tElivemial apin• taffloggl,d KIM I I. 'KV ILL IREIOktiliimbilitradinevf

q EPE Immo*, 41 OW giedEit **Nig pridm Ma gm AIN Am Weellb 'Ad I ANN wee IMMO kit IMP I. 16 /111 re.1 Ida 10111111 eat' thil rtal1A1 Mil WE miEF Itio wir Ellieparr

.Idi

= 1*

erl

I

I

4

IIJ

if ag

MI IIlI W.1 Y II iiinimfas m1,1 mbio

Mallah

1111.N11 VA MB: IU IM p

F m

I

Ti


ACTUAL POPULATION GROWTH - - - PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH

/

SOURCE CITY PLANNINC. DEPT. 1900

1920

1940

1960

$990

POPULATION GROWTH FIGURE ONE

PUBLIC

TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON BY J.J. BAKICEP P.ENG.

2000


CHAPTER TWO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS IT IS TODAY

The Edmonton Transit System commenced in 1908 as an electric street railway operation. Expanding with a booming Edmonton it suffered from an excessive plant and capital burden. The system incurred heavy losses until much of its debt was retired about 1930. The street railway system functioned on a comparitively low fare structure, but it did meet all its bond interest and redemption obligations: however overall it was not considered a successful financial venture for the city. During World War II the system was able to handle unprecedented volumes of passenger traffic, the system operated at that time at a substantial profit in spite of a low fare schedule. After the war the conversion from streetcars to trolley buses was completed. Up to 1960 the transit system has been profitable and sound. However a number of weaknesses also showed up, namely: 1. A multiplicity of transfer points 2. An incomplete network, hindering other than downtown movements 3. Poor and slow service in outlying areas 4. Severe crush loading in the peak hours. In the period 1961 to 1968 there have been numerous changes made to improve the )5eAvice provided. Express routes were introduced, routings changed to provide a better network, and new outlying areas were incorporated in the service network. Transit is faced with a number of problems which make its financial future look grim indeed. The main causes are: 1. In order to retain its downtown pratonage it will have to operate more miles, since the population has moved to the outskirts MOM in Volume I required that transit should increase its share of the market which would necessitate even more miles of operation and therefor greater cost). 2. Vehicular interference, particularly downtown, slows down the transit buses. The resulting lower average speed requires more vehicles to maintain even the same frequency (at present 24 extra vehicles are required because of traffic congestion alone).

3.


imp MOE magi Prga AI* irai Wow Iniigo ALI Asir himijuraftlid Lab goal MEM .rmArgtam oPegi I 1,1P aim= 1 ao Pram Pip : mi winuo ammo NeithtS 16. Mlie .4 1144•21404, 1,01.1 •rd offe ew-ki 41E11 br woe pans iw' 141 VW la* Pm' MIMI. EY I MN 1 ki IP il l inkriiOulu nib NEM OM .e.16 dh. rill Ain age 110 'le Prod 411Trifin Arn RINK ea; II .111,11 IMO I JIM 1111 bo "Iggran 1"400 'JLii U4= 1.011 Whop. n'ialma., mlf • Pla hail I g. 66 MINIVIP11111 eafi io‘1111P41111 ISO II. owis .1141%. , 1 mow irm *I mom! Opp* roams imi4 Now Midi I II Y 2 iR I laseil ) KPH MP 1 * CV 0141 101111.P 1. I aft% I a+ up „goat's illke mil 1!1 kirkaa lash r 14; . ippie irsim Aili *hp 49..00 ij " RIM we% elk& 4E114 L'a ' el' • Pit Al Proem ..0 mnibisr0. .:u rus gm Li 11,-•91.• d isain / Elio Prt sPakkiri wit NI am! blvvim id1P14 A' Pay g• Ai i 'EPA IMOD MO I WW1 3411641111 I I no rey 16 k/Awi lin Ito

%-m

.41141.1-pt. .11...

11 I *Apr. lam sjimi

pilm im r .r.d.bu.42 mai :11 IGIMIP.W1611 1`• 40.11:1 P mow" yaw .11104Ndin /WA'

mk


3. Transit riding has increased in the peak hours but has remained steady midday; it has declined/ in the late evenings, on Sundays and Holidays. More vehicles and men are required even though the total revenue will not increase proportionally. 4. Transit is required to move special rider catagories at far less than cost (school children and old age pensioners). This market is however increasing. The schools are setting their hours in such a way that they require vehicles at the same time as these vehicles are nccded for adults downtown, the consequences are disastrous for the E.T.S. There is a need to charge maximum fares only in the peak hours to all patrons.Only by using a proper pricing policy will the most economic use be obtained from the equiwment the city has available (in other words similar to the red, white and blue fares on the CN). Also a better financial reconciliation is required for the service provided to old age pensioners. 5. New and unproductive areas have to be served by transit as a matter of policy. However the patronage does not satisfy the present criteria that the transit riders should be paying for their service through fares (or that "the transit system should not have a large deficit"). 6. There is a constant inflation of labour and equipment costs. This increase in costs has not been offset by an increase in efficiency, nor will this be possible using a bus operation. In view of the above listed problems it should be expected that the E.T.S. revenues from fares will continue to be less than its expenses. In fact deficits will continue. Any review of the price structure should keep in mind that the adults already contribute the major part of the revenue now and in fact subsidize the uneconomic features of the E.T.S. The occasional rider (the person who wants transit service as a standby to his car) should be made to pay, while the regular rider should get the benefit of using the system regularly. The price structure should encourage the use of tickets and monthly passes, benefiting the regular user. At the same time a standby charge should be made to those residents served by transit (say within half a mile).


mormi IniamP no kg bah= r kis iiro dedebtit kirENP ihma %amIstiese mildadiii AM' Italiganel 1141111119111 Eh ME ME OPP 1111 040111P iiWO EP Egi wisimap die .411KINIFIll i Wir kmilfPr Prh win hiswv 41i in Dolt. . hid isdriliftel 1 Wild itar..whiriik, adad a -kV a 4Iaz MileM qm op% pi wit WI I aar r%1! &IP rr we ohm I al IVO hid agik 4).Pg* I 71 'al 1161 1111 1 1 01 41Mailatek " !PO IPI MI qtr elm Ammo w in I ...Av. 1%11014 %IA% *Anew! io.vo us fr. L Mk 0-6, WM* I r. NI I 10111111 VII Purr rfc NW: Wail 4 er PP 41 MI abill MIA St"iF& I .NYC W•1403,4 51'!" ..P4Acrin ihift TN! PEOEFFil MI +NT 0114 • MOP I I ILIpp INIR=111 4841411 a le I 01' pi:err joi. !Irbil Aware aulnklb MI ' 54 ,:4111 WRAP IF

IN

Elpadvag ihm imp; L 14% inKiglim! Meal •61 q E111 .11:11M111 11. P I 1111PICI I 'Mg 4 h r.1 1+ 110 .6. IONA' arincs4irrMi

rk01.1

441 MO IMO MN 11

Arglprt .!: lb R. 1121.11APEICUA111. 1005q. 04 )41 gob I a I wig n.pl .11 ,a I ...A rig •ardwaria Ida

'010

gw40 gt

mpo spry k r oFR4 LI1 •• 14 .1 9.14. )4C qt. h eltIN 10; 1E0 trim .1.1 roe. .3- wati 454dikrak ipaigh•I . 110 p (.`YONW:11: al INAS' Dm hi I eh let•.44 wal• aboarge4 impo okihnig now " L Lo1N4 I L E 10111,0 eV 1 411FI ME all illemadai 101Eciri1111 . eg. seivo mi Ws di 11 I— E Sri .1 L'iik al 1.11'e t-00151" 121 Effr 4.11

;ell*

:011101 I WOO IMP

r rim ei• %Ito I Vaal IN


The standby charge is similar to the initial charge made by other utilities like telephones, electric power or water. Such a charge could be levied in a variety of ways. So far this charge has been paid on the basis of meeting a deficit out of property taxes. A special frontage tax is probably difficult to implement. The recommendation of the Transportation Committee of November 21, 1967 of assigning 2,5% rate of return on owner equity from Utility profits as revenue to the transit system should be implemented. It may be of interest to note that the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), which serves the Boston area, is partially financed by a special cigaret tax. The need to give high school students children's rates is questioned. These students take up the same space as adults and sometimes do more damage to the buses. They should pay adult fares on the regular ETS routes. The school bus problem has not been fully resolved. Presently the Provincial Government through the Foundation Program pays for distances over 11/2 miles. Amore economic operation would result if the government paid a grant (say based on all students over 11/2 miles) regardless of what type of bus the student uses (regular service or special school buses). Special school buses (also painted in the regular ETS colours and allowing same standees) can then be provided to the school board as part of the cost of education to solve their transportation problem. Passes should be sold to those students within 11/2 miles from the schools. The rates charged for these special buses should be based on whether these buses are required in the peak hour or outside the peak hours (in the latter case no additional vehicles have to be purchased and the ETS could charge incremental costs only). Such a system would encourage the school boards to time their movements in a more economic manner. Simply raising adult fares again and again will not solve the basic problem, since the adults would start using cars instead aggrevating the traffic problem further. Detailed financial recommendations are given in Chapter Nine.

s.


mikomi

m rim 4m

now

mar In gam mil

bliggh MARV 11,01 r nom um tam OAR .Prbio &Mama 111 MI •Mil ITO 'Po RI& F''P Iillil• kI . NIP•11 j '..4q• p IMMIPIPMMOLM iilabitkah PIA r tem 1E1 m rev ..rap ei;41 11 bu mdimion lamr Adis ippo Ogarig kee Wit• ,40:111 P AMA AP 1.4 liar Ni 3r.le getkiliar lap Imgri* , rmi rim amid E4II4pII:40114 Urlid &PIMP WW1 I ILMEMil MEW Ma* flite1110 zwidpiTee EU] laprpict liktffighni in wow "i wr 4 Al Itil ImMrso Um!) mei ;Vim tor tol opt I mg m Opegiom Filo 01 hipping I MI:114E. D44.611•11 di MAN ma In•I•1 r mop 'AUL* img smm palm rdi Tom Ai id 10.0 D rat ithilppin admix 'm kmird FAI Imp v.. mop NEM. al WON mbila NI hill El OW icti I% Ito 01 4=1E1.1, 'l el 1 ,1 si.varrs via Paid! MEM lur Pod IP ICA Mini .7' RV 7k9 1111 WW1 %Am•*K2 lb. morau. simple .titir Ior liNg OIM emlel El del 1184.I tliPahd lel 5.2I Fri iiIFEIW lap itipr Npi inirkgadtpl. 4-W p 41.4 imago! irwo, Amyl a 0, hi PRI II NM I iimliguri giammiki 00141011 worifitiOkJWF Oil , 11 "MO si ab& Mad

• 1

I • I


flIJRE

E T.S. REVENUE AND 8

REVENUE WITH UTILITY PROFIT)

7

//

NOTE: EXPENDITURES DO NOT INCLUDE 5% REVENUE TAX CHARGED UP TO 1962

6 /

/i REVENUE FROM FARES

5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES

ii

4

A OPERAT I HG EXPENDITURE6 l

FARE INCREASE

1945

1950

1955

1965

IWO

FIGURE TWO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON BY J.J. BAKKER P.ENG.

I /66


CHAPTER THREE CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN EDMONTON

New Areas

Edmonton's plans call for residential expansion generally towards the North-East and South-West. Development towards the South-East is blocked by the Industrial belt and to the North-West by Industry and the Greenbelt between the City and St.Albert. The new residential areas are generally planned on the neighbourhood principle, which means a fairly low density. The neighbourhoods are surrounded by good, wide arterial roads which form a supergrid. The new areas lend themselves to private car transportation and are not attractively served by transit. Older areas

The older areas of Edmonton are going through a period of transformation. The redevelopment generally means a higher density of development, creating different transportation problems tan existed up till now. Some of this redevelopment is occurring on private initiative (South Garneau, Jasper Avenue West of the CPR line, etc.) and some is occurring due to public investment (Civic Center, Urban renewal). The redevelopment of older areas and the provision of new transportation facilities are closely related. Central Business District

The Downtown plan (Part IV, Chapter X, of the General Plan published in 1963) predicted that employment in the central area would double between 1961 and 1980. In recent years a number of office towers have been completed and more are under construction. In fact the rate of construction is much faster than was originally predicted in 1961.


I II

Mm WIZILIPP t +14/ atiac Giozed .01544vaiti wen= ig delsiimairaim hato how metaraader II IMAM Zei JIJ WA& gag' in WWII Wallow imp irpowai 11. VP 10 kw kei 44 1 ho RTIBM itt Wilek OMR= *ea fitcA iiimari 311 lift% +tdoir i lbee ei II Ide /no PRAOPRIPOSN I ISM WWI *RE alma Ague le weft impuessifiii rJ

In Mow iimatim'Isiiit .4D Ogrilislig IA cam taliki/ Ilir mom Y 211-141PW 1. 14111n1101M11110 MM..' sr' IN=EfI 1I rIP I Mu* MOM IN efailarsilin ocaznietenVen oriki go 1.61g Rani E41 rimu Immo k.911 Jabal"' 44M Eliza

,012111MilltU 111461 'if

lh gala mei air hiii! n tais lett4olUdi vi #14. 01 .1 slil Ji.1

4113

2:41101 ,11.• bitamdc eicoe. a§ ;wait .11± uko. 1.1.1 ir•rcip441 UR NAM% sir 154 MEW 'WA AVM PCP tromiim 'Lila& mei tal. 1/1 1. wind alp .Jr I 1 Pi WOW AVIii a: mega mitt pel 0.111 I. eAllgthkb 111

I

II •


The increased employment downtown will however be confined to the Civic Center and the Commercial core. In other words the plan calls for a high density development downtown. While there is still some surface parking space available, the increased development will also mean an increased demand for parking spaces. The net result will be that more parking structures will have to be built and that far more potential all-day parkers should be encouraged to use public transportation. The aim of the Downtown Plan was to divert traffic not destined to the Central area around it. However if this diversion occurs too close to downtown, than the radial freeways will be jammed by downtown oriented drivers, together with the traffic that is supposed to be diverted. If a freeway by-pass is located further away from the center, several advantages are realized. First the spacing of interchanges can be further apart which improves the efficiency of the by-pass. Secondly the downtown oriented traffic will not interfere with the by-pass traffic. There is no reason why the Groat Road (upgraded to an expressway) cannot serve as the Western by-pass and Kingsway as the Northern by-pass (rather than a freeway at 110 Street on the West and a freeway between 106 and 107 Avenue on the North) around downtown. In any case the by-pass ring as proposed in the Downtown plan cannot be complete because there is no interchange possible between the McKinnon Freeway and the South Freeway. By upgrading the Groat Road (which can be done in stages) such an interchange becomes possible. Government Center

Government employment is expected to increase from 6,000 in 1961 to 15,000 in 1980, according to the Downtown Plan. Again this expansion in employment will mean a more intensive land use and a need for additional transportation facilities. The new McKinnon Freeway will serve the Govaullnent Center, but like all freeway solutions additional parking spaces would be required. A rapid transit line over the High Level bridge would enable Goverlutient employees to park in the South-West (also accessible to Jasper Place via the Quesnell Bridge) and the North-East. Such a line would greatly reduce the amount of parking spaces required at the GoveLument Center. At present the Government lots are intensively used during office hours. With a rapid transit line shoppers could also use these lots on Saturdays and shopping nights when these lots are empty.


imu

Omit *saki

up. MI141 lid

1&

impala

NEM I=t

.1 !ENE PIEW WM&

Aim I FF1E.=

ruismsgii P2 2 'I II NIP ;de di MI Nu Iii ' 4 WO NI

Epp! II MIER II

1 , WWI

% mot

• sir b"F rev Ircibi von.... die VI* PIFFIEll NEm impro Ai g* Lb la eimh fd el • s

I immei painefil 1,1 I ill al •kaalla

41. 11,1 ,1+110 I ! 3.1 .11 1 left 11 UN 11.1.64 rap %pp Fieb,p. I or . 4; 11FC kl I I 111 11 OPE MAN IMO ' Nal • ip

rd. E. I tionsits

m%

' yli Ohm d 1.1

'Pw

0.0

mcsiroi• op* Immai

ill. I.

Mi I AI Moll 0 P .

MP EWE! CNI

ONO mill &elmfEur

• 110.1d r 'PH Ird4

'Ps

IP PO'

dr0 PPM

11 • 'Ill '121 Per' .11 '1111 MEI

mm4 ••?, wpm tormsd 'PI Ihim

Etdmerd '

With% =lid IAA.IiII914 I r Fa Ws AM ill

'I gig 2, Epp

r 1.

I

Pe

r ESE •

1m11.111%1M

•A

4'11 .'4'L I 31 Oil 4)Ti I

la EN' iNim ill 14

I IN

914 691. E. I P

I .11•1

'4111

II .. 'I Its I t'll

EINV

' lc. g. .1.1 male .11 Img1B ' ii LiP114 I Am , 1.141.'

1!

new 91miry1 ii iszioq 1"

wuk1 hi I b' aig%

d • • .1 di Imer I., •frh

mml rid

141

L

'PI • 1 II' • I $ I'PI RI IC . • I pm.. I. I ow .1,4 I .

wmpi dm •

0111

WINE kira 1 .1 RI I —I apin II 1 °111

dudidi

-I

14

FEIN 10.1 6% IMP#1441P


UNIVERSITY

The University is expected to grow from its present enrollment of approximately 14,000 to 22,500 by 1975. While at present about 3,000 students use the E.T.S. bus system, it is expected that if parking was available and present conditions would be maintained 5,000 students would use the bus in 1975. Another 6,000 would drive their car and then park on or near the campus. The University is already very short of parking space however the space now available is earmarked for buildings. With the shortage of capital funds for teaching and research buildings, it is unlikely that the University will be able tc build any parking structures. NI.E.T.S. did not present any proposal to solve the University Transportation problem. A recent study done for the University recommends $ 15 million worth of parking structures. Another study recommends $ 7 million worth of parking structures for the Health Science Complex. There is some doubt whether the street system around the University can take very much more traffic than it does today. The alternative to providing parking spaces on the campus would be for the University to rely more on public transportation. If the University were to make land available on the University Farm for a large parking lot, then it might be possible for the University to solve its transportation problems. However it would require fast and reliable, high capacity transportation between the farm and the University. A bus system would not be able to supply such a transportation system. What is needed is a form of rapid transit, either as done in Fort Worth by a Department store (described later) or by having a city rapid transit system that serves the farm and the University. The Transportation implications of developing the University to 22,500 students size (or larger) have not yet been faced. In any case there is some doubt that it would be a wise expenditure of money to build $ 15 million of parking structures, if the entire South-West rapid transit line could be built for this amount of money. There is a valid case for Provincial GoveLiment support for a rapid transit line, since both the Government Center and the University would so greatly benefit from such a line.

9.


z

mildialinvI llama ;11 T140 Ism himplo pi viroxiii 11 ewe &lime 14 iamb* al law Eli IMO moduli lerrEal aPM 'del tirel iknium wildael gal Wee to obi'. mit Li im Imbientio Immo& Imam id lamed* %1 lE UMW' Am III t I MiN het Iv el PITO IOW e %Or woe mtorim 914601 ssreial okarEgial Jai isia 4Ln kedialirda ilLIME MPS Witm lbatio'.. do 423 A 'VII ie I atift pra Weil weft * rot Mow wpm &ix 4-, te5 WPM 6111 Nat $1! 11114710 alike 03 AP) PM= POW PIM M le& geolo I SAC AP If . ma. I lay, ft aff igidigh El IP NW -4 pilaf kivi !ier41..cri °114 trgi eo Ffrp. eq, EIME044 cleaftmo EMI AI OPP ouhd imam 4411 gal Mid§ MOWN ahadeif aktderre lead frCit el 2 iivw %al WM • ON i s Fi1taw writ mil ligANNei Oil I sari Nol We' laa 'MEW mi Wei

.0 valid lad Imonsonki mug I4rpi, a 01 OW I eitieshat !LB lei aim 61101 EMI Ha 411113' Ihfrele miwavitae, tea Nil row-4.14ra a. hl PLI oPPrElb, IRO diE001 Mil 1PP boot I ihnia mon I col JAM iff OM Iry mad drama e • POD,R:v dupe Mod anis 41 publbanage dnixtu Leb icoonwe isotql ko) p Pone 11 Mem. 1111. 64 NO adalq. )4t ApPor e• mewl wlairtMrin vimmi ipke isp


EXHIBITION GROUNDS

Economics requires that the Exhibition Board uses its facilities to the maximum extent. More and more therefor the Exhibition Grounds will be used as an entertainment center. During Klondike days and other events traffic congestion occurs around the Exhibition Grounds. It makes sense that the Transportation facilities between the Exhibition Grounds and Downtown should be excellent. A rapid transit line along the C.N. right-of-way would be the most direct path from the Exhibition Grounds to Downtown. Such a line would make the parking facilities needed for the home-to-work movement in the South-West and North-West available for the events that occur at the Exhibition Grounds and the Edmonton Gardens. During the daytime the parking at and near the grounds could be available to the downtown oriented employees. CLARKE STADIUM

The parking at the stadium has been used during Klondike Days for Park-and-Ride. However for downtown oriented trips nark-and-ride trips using buses Clarke Stadium would not be suitable. A rapid transit line serving other parking areas as well, would make use of this parking lot during the entire week all year round. Again it would reduce the downtown parking requirements. The rapid transit line would also serve the stadium better during the football season. In the case of the Exhibition Grounds and of the Clarke Stadium the net result would be a better and more continuous use of all parking facilities. A DOMED STADIUM, CONVENTION CENTER or TRADE CENTER

A stadium or Convention Center draws large crowds and should be able to handle large volumes of people. From the point of view of Transportation it is essential that such a facility be built along a rapid transit line. In that way parking facilities along other portions of the line can complement the parking facilities provided at the stadium or convention center. To rely only on car transportation for a stadium or convention center can lead to traffic congestion, particularly if such a stadium or center is located between closely spaced interchanges on a freeway. The exact location of such a facility should be given a considereable amount of study.

10.


ormottioN4Pktam* mbliald4 WORM MIPPUNP1111 OIL 431 ANA a Id 9 en II ral • ilMktlin' 157 • 1111 ' ;oda AIL me* pp" gjohisaisal 1, i; 1.111M )1 1 I "11553 sia Olk:E. al I 11•11 NW 1115b1 Pc r .11711% len ME =Wm Ni61 ..11 r Rah ' ooze %%7 Wimp& • d I ' •

p pm PaPil 111•10, .c 14 1 mgropp. oppr mph gas w, rigisphi asi4 tin!~ Mi. Dili% 6 .ftlornd its II lec oltigli.14M416. 411IP I.11c " 01 I P.APEa. MEI NEL Elp IN/1w .1.)§ 1114. 21101 ine ow la IFP Pm 111 " 1.1 171 I I I I lk figoikt NIA 1PP RIM upp iipp P IPA WON WI 11111 171111lJfPig 111* ill mks I, IPIE P7 oliVirl ktiltim %IMO ,

*wow

Pnab A4Nlif.

Da& lb I

5151617111,

Aro- 9' 1- kr, lbim

1^ 1 11 a' ! '

lied0 FRia 16 411,2b1

r itan WW1 , ' =OM WI 01 I go i 4 021.1 er ' J P ml ipsub p "01 ill MI 1444121114 911 lig W' 11•P lid 'A. PI c•ri 'mem 4 WPM

Pal PIN al III

I I

.101"N,PitiD r3, 191 proamstawie Pr.a.ch ruP 01110611 adidrgial f .d.him II'

M I

mIlle kW; .0•

*FM

Maar dk roN P01111101101


CHAPTER FOUR REVIEW OF PLANS

M.E.T.S. (Metropolitan Edmonton Transportation Study)

The M.E.T.S. proposals call for a system of roadways, with primary emphasis upon a fieeway ring around downtown with a number of radial freeways to the outlying areas. The radial freeways would go to the South-East via the Mill Creek Ravine, to the South at approximately 110th Street, to the West along McKinnon Ravine, to the North-West via Kingsway and the Western edge of the airport, and to the North-East near the C.N.R. tracks. M.E.T.S. assumed in its calculations that the percentage of people using public transportation to downtown would increase from 27% to 35% in 1980 (or an absolute increase of 2.6 times the 1961 volumes). However since the increased riding would be confined to the peak hours, the peak hour increase in transit riding would have to be more than three times than what it was in 1961. The number of freeway lanes needed and in particular the exits required were determined assuming this increased transit use. M.E.T.S. practically ignored the Bechtel plan for rapid transit and suggested that the increased patronage for transit should be achieved using express buses on freeways. The M.E.T.S. report, however, forecasted a problem of traffic congestion downtown and suggested an elevated set of roads for the downtown area to be used exclusively by buses. No cost figures were given for this proposal. NO suggestions were made in the M.E.T.S. report to solve the traffic problem around the University area, although this area was mentioned as a problem area in Volume I of M.E.T.S. There is no evpdence either from other cities or fium the changes made in the E.T.S. routes since 1961 that a patronage increase of the magnitude demanded by M.E.T.S. is economically possible u6ing bcou on exating noad6 and ptopozed 4nemay4. While new outlying areas could be served via freeways, there are few existing bus lines that could benefit from the proposed freeways.

11.


I I

MEMO= .11=01 ig SA. !Mae 111r71111 Eby it WNW ermoisib Romig per.1* 1110614 i Per N

gal

op Mkt diamixtA

del 415 442 weal AR. MN get. 412 km' .d.P tit! ea% APIAMAI Alm gie;) 1+140! PIP I I1 I :P .110:1 irilf !IF band lialkeifti mill IV l ea ortn lo *1 }g fdrirdOon I it. ..;Zin b eirusEr 144 Awrrc P11.041164.iie, 11.Avvii& el'1/2 1161F • a oritrir *ono. vuel EN gifts IOW 1911003 '.Ii N.61 fill in *iv Frk am." MAIN 1 Eel" kylswr 1, ' Stsi IR '11.P M..' &kr T.J %V idol MIEN lb= Era loppi or. LPre...i iu.'' rv. Moog I ' •eriad WNW ICI WOW Y'r va• J.': J 4.4.1i. lag 01.0.10 .1 110 Prom. raw ttgfr a I 41 leo 111 '11kikrba Will Mil R 3i II .1.4141 howl dild '.'2 •.JEri FVffia COI Al 1.1 .11.1 1141M IMF '1 'II 51111. Al Co: '. 11'21 11 • :141'rf ' '■ I •.Ir$1' 11.4111611:10 !VII ›.1 111141Mili 1.114!"1.1.! lorjoreirsi a diitiggirifi Rol Niar vi WU AO .114:11% h 010) 1140M ME WWI . .1 kc ' %Pto . dol. wri 111 MINE I ,• I Ind I IFip e g :m trig s!A gift did IIMEIMI k):1 II I g hi1.1 of I • klibbid■ IA I'g' 1 41. 1-1 '.:41.4 OVA !I.. WM ipi '1101F4 IP"' 4 .11 iwrm 'VI' ' n I "• 1.1 Vreile 614E4 W 1 Aiwoit .0 !I '.J %New koala wimp • 0.1trafray.. . 1 .14.Z.10 " liboesesk Oar' :mai MUM I

MiAl l 1:4 'VI "fidil% tk•I'g .:11.1% 4..1411. d...1 ".111A Ve mamaIluI T Ppi kr. r . Elm P bylaw I. hif'10111 4111114111


The Transit System frequently protested the validity of many of the Public Transportation aspects to the authors of M.E.T.S., without receiving satisfactory answers. Now without discussion on transit, the M.E.T.S. freeways are apparently accepted as a firm policy. M.E.T.S. states in Volume 2 that there is reserve capacity on the freeways to handle an increase in traffic if transit riding does not increase as required. However no mention is made whether the ramps on and off the freeways and the roads to and from these ramps would be able to handle any additional volumes of cars. Nor has M.E.T.S. dealt with the associated problems of parking these volumes of cars Downtown, in the Government Center, at the University - Health Science Complex and other large-volume traffic generators. M.E.T.S. has also ignored the fact that express buses in Edmonton as well as other cities have not proven to be profitable and have not attracted paAk-and- Aide patrons. M.E.T.S. was however useful in the data that the study gathered. The study made effective use of the Civic census, a process that was repeated in 1964 and 1967, to obtain travel information. Further the study gave one set of answers that may solve the automobile congestion problem. The Bechtel Plan for rapid transit

The Bechtel Plan is a conceptual plan showing what is possible technically as regards rapid transit in Edmonton. It proposed a downtown tunnel - in otheA waiLds it was adding tAanApoAtation capacity whete it was needed. At each end the tunnel would be connected to three feeder lines, namely the South-East, the North-East using the C.N.R. right-of-way serving the Exhibition and Clarke Stadium, the North along approximately 97th Street, the South-West serving the Govelnment Center and the University using the High Level Bridge, the West particularly Jasper Place, and the North-West using the C.N.R. right-of-way. The Bechtel Plan also gave specifications for equipment and construction which are of the highest standard possible. The experience of the By Area Transportation Study was available for this work. In its patronage predictions (done by Traffic Research Corporation) it was assumed that the travel time for cars could be maintained the same as it was in 1961.

12.


Eli I

1.1116 Loy

=mar map

pi RUC • lidgltI 1:14.100 idigi um jithciiiiiig FAR mop

h

MOM. WW1 41E 011

r. .c ?R. beLal • e IL IMP Vow' i I IWO imP ra '05 MI III !PPM ptildd !"l at. 11 IA* I m.loggil *IN Nig win Eng isiguaggis p 10 fI indiz 31 04441 r z,&Win' ipati Nosi • fill NIN NM ante 03 rat ilea NE pi' IIIJ 11*.1 ' erd4 gill I: IV MI 1. 11" 10114 1.0%/411151% AP I WEE Mifil WW1 WE Pro 111 Al'a we OW a milwahlm lig Ali *MN irisi 11 I I.1:1 e 9 %UV ristrolm rick di' • odd Aliadikesppi OMR 1161 " pipi JIM EVIJI lot 1.111' 1' I MA intan W144.4 VP IWO Imy Ezi kit WI MEM ppm mow 14tireFiVtd:7lTIN117771111. MATIPAI I-41(617 1611E410111 HAM" rwrk eadcvm. lc lokaim0 4,110 1161 PO 1.0% I WI Moriglit J I TA I mad win pi

ipleisTIW 16'7;074 AI WNW

111111 *IP ma Pirr 1141 teAvi.b.0

4Iu ivitpo IN MAIM' PREBNISI cibmial &Arai IWPIMIPPler IF MOO 112101 01121* mil oil *NI& mow oi wool wit thow me.lp mi Ere igag gag Igo •d Iva KW MI 1.94E01 y1104:: rimi•VO 1cp2LIP MEW Lis Eziri 4116 *Mai .. dirds'. 141 ddhimilg p; iikeplagoim mg Li 4rg','I lp kb ittimmt Ppi Qil.lg m mom* Flab ON tads kelps"WIPP 11 %kb 1 4 al 0.101111M N 11914114114.I al IOUs LC. 4.6 tak • .vFr co tom Imam ga . imininkag -irtma Imola? we* rsatibildi do* *mow 11 *Ms 'Pah N. reall h van iirs ilia Ann Imo Pig PIPST-PriCa MAP 11 'PPE 16 II Arare 1141110 z 11 litbrast• ~is do mpg rai ow tweica Elk 11 411Tio f mpfe •

1

et imam iv NNW Vas Immo mon VFW ~gal 11111,1P111&11


It is obvious after studying M.E.T.S. and the Bechtel Plan that there would be considereable duplication of facilities, if both plans were implemented. In the rapid transit plan the lines to the South-East, the West and the North are relatively expensive to build. On the other hand the lines using railway right-of-way and the existing High Level bridge are relatively cheap to construct. Of the freeways the routes to the North-East and to the South as well as the complete downtown ring are very expensive to build. The proposed Bechtel Rapid Transit Tunnel (or some modification thereof) through downtown would appear to be a practical and relatively inexpensive structure; the feasibility of the M.E.T.S. proposed elevated busways would appear to be open to serious question. The City Engineer's Department has a wealth of experience available on tunnelling, experience that should be utilized in the planning, design and construction of any subway tunnel. Using parts of both reports, eliminating some of the rapid transit lines and some of the freeways PROVIDES ALTERNATIVES THAT APE SUPERIOR TO THE PRESENT ASSUMED ADOPTED POLICY; such alternatives have

however so far not been considered. In the preparation of a BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PROPOSAL it should also be realized that the rate of implementation of the freeway proposals in M.E.T.S. is lagging. It appears that notwithstanding Provincial aid, the finances are not available to implement the freeway proposals as proposed in M.E.T.S. by the year 2000, even though M.E.T.S. suggested 1980. Since there will be further growth between 1980 and 2000 consideration should be given now, to provide for a BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN that will have adequate capacity. The Downtown Plan (Part IV, Chapter X, General Plan Edmonton 1963)

The Downtown Plan attempted to integrate the M.E.T.S. proposals and the high density development proposed for downtown. It called for exclusive transit lanes on Jasper Avenue, 101 Street and 102 Avenue; the implementation of one-way streets and the establishment of a bus pedestrianmall on 102 Street between Jasper Avenue and 102 Avenue. It further suggested exclusive pedestrian ways.

13.


-

PI 4102MIEN MI

brilorgliulOr‘IPI`P '.rP, "Oa INIPAD NA !I NftWEIN ROM Pe r i 4.iM

'b

tam= vi in ' hal • 'alai! viP, e. rfie ' IMAMS* pm IMF pla. I II II :moo • pester 111"011 91011 IIP:Iirrol NIA Ah Notimilkish ogl rid Nil :4 kW" II me eirkpl:

IFFIngar

r IMP 4%1

41 l .11 44 4 IBUI 111 1161iMpill P1. WIZ I 491 ogra.E.L. III IV 111 g dei 11.emiorY P Virtg. RO i1bpV 1

. IMMILIIABI,IPP iiI1aju.I .14.1A• '

I

1111111a 14'1

9.1 'mom. 12 mr•Pr I

CLAE11:r."11.11 .0:1M14t451, boo

•4•04.11

WI& quo II ipmem 4. III

r'.. 11.„2"ev96. 1 ,14 el 1,1:7:71:0J gE,1: JP 21Sr! . %IP I I NS Vpiliji 1.41411141111 11 le %,114docal el, a]

r.r..L.USK

WI' I P I VW )1111.11 111 t d r. -%11 Jo la* linkili iii 101111111141110 OPIPAFI mg' II gaderso 01' ow quid .0 •'i'.i 1.14 rawnsi la bill Wine 'I 1 kcjJr L ! .1 .1 I I 2 " '14 " 4 • II • '''I RN? %10:14 "I • I:. rd keing

lb PRIM:0

millsatiNt fp. 414 pm. ugk %run RAMO z, 111.. 401 amp' CPA& 4 1 dfilf hi' I Ina? 111.419.1 lid WON= rWririr. 41/401 Nita loom I img. we I AP

nod Nirip

• no' . i NKr KrIminicim ed ik Ipp I ill • N.1111'41•1 0'111'10 od rsmirgi+,/. II* *POI L I Irmo IWO DM" 4"Pi New 4154 N. hely, 2.1. I 11111014110 WV, ihyr MP II Pi ill 14 ON PI rit:9 4 ' M 1.'0E06. mht I1PLjne ijim p ' any'. Ai" ell I? owl irs' ro may OPIP 0110.1144P 1111 tadRil NOM%


"yid K-7-.1_60.11,4,) ;,

tEtilr1...iitaiii 1,..'i=dit . i,. biitualrli rL: - ..! jirrieF117,11151114-Mnrilll I— IDOL' i, l in li, 1 foininiallUiliiiiimmillOgill 511111'.'' \ I1J41i111-51.iii 1-7--.-.--1-11111111r:11.741. li ii ,, I III ri= II 11 II II —. unit ? 11111111%4 , 101.11! \xi tiiiiHrtiV ------1paiiiiiii 0 -itr-

i iii: ,,,,, ,zii, .;,, ga 1 -L- :ui, , ...w: fr ' zp‘r iiirei ---;non 1 inilith'iliiiiiiiiiol,.?:4 Ad ullEIII , , iflliiiiiiiiii ii. 1.1 roil-m-94 1 i n9i1 li kili 1t1111.11111431"11 11111111 11 'AlPigiSii 111'41 mill Aim; II -r i III 112.'1,111 1111

tall 1 1:!"-:=,- -1,1., ' ' '

fl

pH mil

Ilirk 14 „ 1\-4,(7.111iiiTinit

pA..;711111111n-

--11 -111IN ' It I IIIIr Alil Ili. )110 ---r misolir.210 r-r--g„.94,4-41 mita Hi 101k7iTeily H1111 1 • --i 1 , 'ILIA 11 1

......

.1

I 1. 41 1 I "L.- ,I1'. . —1L. -Lti.,

I

1V ' *

L. \,4VIInliiiril'usliiiillr ---i---4-••

E

.,4

.--1,err,,.:•

1 '''I I IMII II il ill I ;iiil ki r 1 iI ia‘jiiiimit

Nail01 'II 11-1111[111.i*

11111 11111

'•

111111 II ri1111 _pre a to I II '1;101 III" W.: 211V•"'•_\*% !! I IP'_, -1.AT Af , — ''''' 13; '*.11---,,,-- ‘,r

,,,Dio-m ,,vi -r-gT1isTr. i‘l1 11,1!-e 11 11 4 Itki4 II

..,...:=-1E=.9J

3 2 111111[01 ET 13I2111.!:

IIIIIIII1AIIIIIIIr

i>1...;„4 n.10 ,ii.1 It-,;• IIIIIII, IV. IP' [WA AI 0 0 11 1 I 1 111111 11 ..,0 ,-k 1111 1 II 111111 II 1 IPA .11P ' liall n iiifiiii 'n um' willirm

I lrri

III

inun thlf

gili iiii ulltiiiiii iir...1 iilliiiiiiiiiiiiii n...1 -c111., _ .. ri 1./1HIfr tii iiIII 1 y i[Wr 41,llikitiiir cil i .p II il 11411 I 1 IIIIIIILINIII.Alill III Jlir IIIJIIIIII111111111111111 m alr-,1

V.1:11111 1k,, _ v, I Flipl,101111 iiii ilk.`..1.!LiIIII_ \ 7.--r".

0 ,

lit IlifleA

-

..tillititti.1.%iii0

et[1)1.1.1-71-1 ,..En * .--..111\lt , ." II 1111 111;4 II II11

. , _,•,..,0,2,.--• ,F

)4%10' °

'1 11C16°V1 '141 1) 112" ygi Hill'I!!!:!. P PI ' ' i11 Ilt0t1 RI 11'4 tilir‘ '')2C-(gEli -..11 - lirr lk:---j 7'4,, '...'All' #;‘.* °.411!"t _:-%,"' ii111" 1 1.1 I1111111" .t ‘‘'\ j'l itO 1-11j II11Allii.: 111 ilitlia ,A,V..! _. II lid 11,11,!E ;3 iIii11111 4.: 1 =.1. --12)I A inn skit Il!sial..-••trfiiroj,..- t112.7/1::1111 mil§ iiiiii mumlliifl4 - -----z-wziLig --...ir oirici--.iT__,. la 1 1 Ramp if, 1 0 .,11111' , nil Mil li

.

.-1,, ,,.,: ,,...1'

gpil'ilioall

11211,

ri II w

;-e- iiiii viiii nr---t.'‘‘ ---1'fgratkS•L /1 .11-(litl 11 ,1 dii'ti,AL':.11 r illi-, —t -. \ — 1 ,I liipil0j1111111,11.r .401 h rr iikti

;

pmop _ 1---11-1HH

---11- r-a-. 4N

‘IfiL if 17jf71 -+:.118 11l 44 03fr

:r,i ai 1:‘, .411 ., --, 1 -7:k 7:''%

1 4. dill71

011,mmum

.4. _ i_letwo BECHTEL RAPID TRANSIT iFil,\ -011,44soril u ,F i i iriKim "II' In0 ....,,,,,. 64 LINES AND M.E.T.S. 1 1".11 mil4„ .. i-iir'ik I .1.....y.,,,, ilkxiqf ..1,41WS/ii jf 1 in. AR _Ii FREEWAYS . IlirlianT-a 1,7„.:2...1.,k-t.:),

1

:

!ijl

It

'IA341 1611115 IIIIIIIt ) wit% ram

15;vr..,:•!4, i'li, 11 12

144p;).)) 126-i-Z.-14;2

-±------Iiil.,-...

11

11 4

L.

RE ir °Imill si Nil 11 11111M mon IF

(FROM 1963 REPORTS) FIGURE THREE

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON.

JAN. 1968.


Ned !MUM rid I El14 Irera Art Nsi mil

I. I I

1

.

Matt

1 . Aim Armor. ie. Auerstweiviuktr I I. I

I

I

I I

. t

r


Of the traffic proposals only some of the one-way streets have been implemented. With the implementation of the one-way streets (102 and 103 Avenues) the transit system reorganized its route system downtown. In this reorganisation several left turn movements were eliminated and some of the routes were transfered from Jasper Avenue to 102 Avenue. A further dispersion of routes is not desireable, since the bus routes would in that case be located too far away from the destinations of its patrons. While the one-way system introduced on July 2, 1967 brought some relief; it should be realized that high density development is continuing faster than expected. The traffic congestion will therefor continue to increase and in turn will increase the frustation of the motorist and also of the transit system in providing a reasonable and regular service. THE GENERAL PLAN, CITY OF EDMONTON, August 1967

In Chapter XII Transportation is discussed in the General Plan of the City of Edmonton, as published in August 1967. The General Plan indicates that within the next six years the City will reach the requirements for rapid transit, as stated by the American Transit Association, namely: the desire to create a strong regional center the metropolitan area will reach 500,000 and the core area will reach an accumulation of 80,000 or more - the travel time fLum home to work will be 30 minutes or more The General Plan recognizes the difficulties of financing public and private transportation simultaneously. It suggests that existing rail facilities be used for mass transit including the Calder Yards and the C.P. South-East branch. It should be realized however that employment centers that have adequate free parking facilities like in the South-East are not attractive for rapid transit. Rapid transit can only compete to areas of high density employment surrounded with an area of traffic congestion and with a parking shortage. The C.P. South-East branch line could possibly be made successful if high density residential areas were developed in that area. The General Plan like M.E.T.S. places emphasis on the all-day traffic distribution to the Central area (73% by car, 27% by transit). It should however be remembered that in the peak hour this distribution is nearer 50 per cent by transit.

16,


MiNIMIIIMMINFOF INE11, ME MIR alrig4iirethilA %INV* MEW

'WS mob imam" FP *hid 41•Ikk 11511 pm Kim Igo Swims I fill oftr• 111111-ff IV RI rig" . inirggati IWO In Ai I 1111n 441111P aliklend rblic elth Pen: ow i4ni'%q.4.1" ei[idmittillo AIM albdaPial ofigi.1 U Ilia A lei atm Ir oti J411.1Alk !Abe& 11416 dIF/P/P NI in MIN le g II: 11)1W 911 ill MO/WM 04 UMW :R .1'1111 11341tragi1 Ciale411M1 Oil

iraPiX vcaltrtI iiintliwit. bye OP .P.4,1i daei 11,1 F k • 'I V • aeisi UV- aA14 Ppikkik Ede &tau d..im 1. • ' oh 4.1 tini led ki Am.' H., II I, r ',WEI/ We etek16102 id I

gib VW Bit a org tikegt

Ii 'I• gg

;d

vka Wig I

41101

wimp

kow.r.. en- 'kw aro IlaVAI Pe 1.141 rfold ION LEI gril et 41

lanrix !ANN

MPbm

q. I& 61 IA

11/1 194 I hrlY

IiP.1 III IRV NIP NC

Nterl Mgr

a

iimi.11 446(9**e. .ininbnominari• ?mon- nrigum smeirbil • .15191 Ish INA PE INN .011 4 . Eli lib NMI WI !IP No hc..1 o4 Woggle :.•'T • *Age ;MI eill1101 143.1r Mite .1sEmin IA* lip BC! *alai 04i11 mite? NIP I II NI e n.pava Aii aI ankh mooprial ming la& 441 !Di oxIsissarginfr le MP a at .61Ui , meal:1p * 4,61 n am* via Omni *ESN a NO ..c rp saNC to Japonlasia kl& 511 hismiles vim MUM re .rmp vff Pantimin :of I' 031Nal " alid! lag AleiRej pi 'Pi .A.11 a .1 4" I PRIMP J11,1104. 11 irwAll %Liu 'MN •ENTI aroll hip rwkicel EP pipe' A11610314 11116p -

I


CHAPTER FIVE TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS OF EDMONTON'S GROWTH TRENDS The High Density Downtown, in the Government Center and at the University

High density means a high value of development for a given area of land. Since costs are high, storage or static uses of land have to be minimized - hence high density also produces a terminal problem. The advantage of high density is the close proximity of related activities, however it also means that everybody arrives and leaves at about the same time - hence the peak hour problem. Because of the high value of development, parking costs also become high (in Montreal $ 35.00 per month at the Place Ville Marie), The high cost of land will also mean a high cost for freeway construction if undertaken in the high value areas. Generally therefor freeways are not proposed in the downtown area but skirt around downtown disgorging their traffic onto the existing street system. The building of freeways also means a loss in tax income of the land taken up by the freeways and its interchanges. The land requirements and the construction costs are high in order to secure the necessary peak hour capacity tying in the freeway and the existing road system. Within and around a high density - high value development there is characteristically a zone of traffic congestion. The need to move people all at the same time within and through this zone of traffic congestion is the basic obstacle to the effective use of a bus transit system. A bus transit system has characteristically very high manpower costs in providing short duration peak capacities. The manpower cost component (now about 70%) has increased rapidly in the past and shows every indication of continuing to do so. The sole reliance on a road system by both public and private transportation in the winters that Edmonton experiences creates transportation breakdowns and expensive operating costs.


bi RIM 511

*14 31 I waif

wig...,• OW

iFsiP 11 MI

-Raw mai "rib

awapromi pis iddloil

..0 h• *Iwo gala@ Id 101 bedew swim. miti iptikbea ecipt Ra Mix br pol.1,11 ;oat igjedi4 4E1 14 mgdoi lokkoksti im

INS INN= eiMellararR NIP *AV RR 11.1 TM 11=111P

'IP

uat hii( comet4 gligi

Waal I Ital Pt Nil MOW

PRA I IAN 1. 31 Peg F

ula? PI ktia MOE A& ?via %.1 pirc ragi

Weida' Pir 44.dur olh • .1 :ar, id foil O. Oiallidtrip IMAM Ig ifl 'i't Ma auraLI,i lab tk; ) ill gravallq mrz ir tisvidAsa Lel I: AM! I45 Mt MAN air 411iiPOW 41161. Emmy' Ea& Pima 'I map PaEll MA'AM or. oti ha Nor. nil /kid 1,1:11 Asirojimipi

d

vitsladilik4kgi! 1::marelri1 1116A1V htel

A

I 51 IjI g Ndi miryi I Ix e !UMW 111141 NIE IMAM latl PI I 141. I 1.1.1' pm !UMW

411INNIKOD 1:111NO J 14g di srP ii4tei opee 1 I K? AVM Mt Lleir I. sa I ?RAN wat .10 *I/ I 1. 7.11 kiLd •

I

u audr

0421. gigahin Irdp tgeth

A IJ.

1171, tEggi wan VIP:te 4! taw

fray

I gl; A

WOW fu.A1.10b40.0 Aim latoidPioli Viih if MI tigirigri n,t; Almon %rector 1A %Jabs KO 511 GM

A Li?P ord.or) ter' CI 64 Margit leati,k4 owe.' Ammo I J. J HAI% TLI avialtrifiliAp 1 % AVIA it.PC Pl4P •

eltli

I I II


planned high density area in which the transportation and terminal problems are not solved, will and probably should only develop A

to a certain stage up to which the resulting inconvenience in transportation can be tolerated. It is of course easier to build roads, particularly since small sections can be built at a time, gradually extending a system offering alternative paths. Further the Provincial Government is willing to assist financially in freeway and arterial road construction. The senior Government has so far not shown an interest in assisting financially in Public Transportation, even though Provincial institutions such as the Government Center and the University would greatly benefit from a rapid transit line. Since it is easier to construct roads only, DECENTRALIZATION is encouraged and the spreading out of lower density developments would follow because the problems caused by high density developments are thereby avoided. It is interesting to note that the Provincial Government encourages high density development (Govelment Center, AGT building, University) by some departments and encourages low density developments by another. The spread-out road system decreases the attractiveness of transit and tends to erode its usefulness. The development of decentralized low density areas - if it is to be served by transit at all - requires a spread out, low frequency and a more complicated transit system of interconnected services. This type of service greatly increases the cost of a bus transit system. A radial rapid transit is attractive enough to encourage people to park at outlying stations and use the train to go through the zone of congestion to the high density area such as downtown, government center and the University. The car would be used to advantage in the low density outlying area, where transit is at a disadvantage. As shown in Chapter Six describing examples of other cities, adequate parking at rapid transit stations is essential in a balanced transportation solution. The mode split at such stations is often the same as Edmonton experiences downtown (one third by bus, two-thirds by car on an all-day basis).

/7


ofam

damildaledi ed taw mama Wild II

liand0610 1116411 id PEP IF M101115P 1~01i1.1 er 111~• PIM ME 19161,146 LINT karrnhiphrir , 4100.4 P.1 lifidig Mop* •6 Atm*, 'kr- pritig 11.r 'ii pirr oirr.rot 4avil 4~F 114 Eiril I LEI Rio hivPr 4ordrreall2 INF nip mapi. aftlipal• IF-0 IP ' NJ amie- 1 •'Avow WEN WWI 'IA ..ww. ow 14 I *IC% OW 40 ajpio VI IS, I Ina iharaw Purl I" a lulqgr 4 N b MONIER' 1. 1161716"11; IN ?el I lb I 1:1W3f11 '11 Ihr Ildinsielmipa'ti 4 iN aiaiIP.td '114kP k1/2 ipaideld Maiplare •••• linr.1 qi '11 NIA Lop. 112je • IOW 1152I IV Fa..vadvo ilgokhi ~I* gr. eopmksdi , o4r, .12121441.4.+2 I ' i IPPPOI la" MINIM 11011' sil r 1.12Arip 1il %II') zIil ?IP v. Cahn drh I it, 0.11 ko• J.%Wiwi WWII maimi emmi al14.141thl Ifra4 iii . t Olt Z = Mai 106000 de. dr I.1 IRV %OMIT oiterel . .p.IIIJI. s Jthys0 mkt It' • 11, PPrzolso az I ' yurd 111 I I I a d1101111117al •611. 11 /41 I Ate: It dial] .1 t. 141 i‘ En I); II I I k•kV 11:1,E.•griftlic bap 40 I L NEM lig 41.I .el.1 I I WI 1 eirieRt an WROZ: iftags wiro login ilk' =MIME KtIP2çIolitileirit LEW!~ biircAsso - I Advie411 Voila lid in Iris nitPallrp IN Urili I; Id.. Lig Moe qt, epc fi ir .,M01:11410 1 111( 1:q .1kargE lakmagril

MM


EDMONTON'S OPPOPTUNITY It should be noted that the high density deyelowents in Edmonton are in one line from the SOUTH-WEST to the NORTH-EAST (University, Government Center, Downtown, Civic Center and at different times Clarke Stadium and the Exhibition Grounds); in other words it shows a corridor development. The same line-up has some inexpensive existing facilities for RAIL transportation in the High Level Bridge, the C.P.R. right-of-way as far as Jasper Avenue and to the North-East the C.N.R. right-of-way. Extensive rail right-of-way is therefor available at a relatively low cost. A rail rapid transit system has the admitted attractiveness of an exclusive route unhindered by traffic congestion, it has higher speeds (a prime determinant in whether people will use transit), higher capacities and much lower manpower requirements. The witty establishment of a rapid transit line would provide the opportunity at this stage of Edmonton's development of encouraging concentrations of development along this SOUTHWEST-NORTHEAST corridor line. This line would also give the opportunity to provide an interconnected system with feeder busses and private cars. The provision of large parking lots along this SouthwestNortheast corridor line means that tAamit witt {)inatty be abte to catelL to the automobile age and privide faster transportation from these parking lots than using the car all the way. Since the North-East and South freeways as proposed in M.E.T.S. would duplicate this rapid' transit line, their construction in a batanced tAampotation zyztem would not be necessary. The diversion to transit in the major corridor has another major advantage to the car user. It will provide relief to those persons who will still have to use their car, either because their employment requires a car or because their area is not served by rapid transit. The road system would also be relieved of many bus movements that now impede traffic. An example of this relief occurred in Montreal where before the Metro subway one lane each way on St.Catherine Street was taken up by buses. After Metro there is only an occasional bus (and it became possible to make the street one-way).


iss kaineme Aoki eiwa is Elmo 'Maii)41110109 6-1171114211 AdE IMIIM MIMEO! likor cdV 401: Ma kV 'II IN. ' irk lcmi7 Owl !NI rit es Mu Feremin 11 1 11 .11,441 liZA I Ward lel 11111 1401 91 91 4111111Ar ' 1l.i1i IrliNgt AIIP MEM gar I 1111.‘ MIE Eli

ni Wail nigh% 11J1131.0 : 11M1 I e PEI w 1.41s ! Noweleakw jeoltin Fir di! I II; II A134. rtc!).. rh F•inrriestiab Melt I I 4011.1 11 IA I pi 41 libel I Jed I 4 4 Lai NI 11110.1 I 1 31 Id 10Merl HIE Iii

" t • I ill...". Pr" '• it° i.•"i 711111+2111% 010.11 ih' 11111111.1111. O. • mu . 1"ho L' Ii k I II is I IN • I I i I " 1.1 •15.k 111 (1 118.11 Imo ma AIM III 011 4.4 o d r aeou.• IMAMS • qr .; r loy +No iree'L Ki .11 •671 umei 44w II. I I 11 911.11P 4011.111§.1 at. e.t4 ▪ • 1.1.1,-fievii I' wig 'Ad dill 1,1 .04.5 I vil• kni I yr. gy.ygdrio j. i I. Ix •., ktr w 0.11ro Aft MI ..111.514.1 ..1 111 I 114 Xi I 14.1. L., VI. I. .4 sorLr Lai ;. atimid • mcgdat .km Ms* Pi. i. I r h II 441 of.:Ivege. P ir 1111P.'[ t • • 1141Clitii" hi.0 .1" '11 . aLa 1.4 ..1%.•••• I OW i 1 as I. I grIll ItC14 41'4 • . ,iLr.j1r low 3 I " AIR "igq i II om tow' '111C mr'i mimio vo 5. Y 1.11 ' .1100a ti; • ' 1111 ill ;911 Nom Ind h 11 • e • II 11 OA 'Plitel AWN "I k • I 1114 • all • eI ielo o ;%146.12 I. I owl 1. I I lb 11111 dm leo Yu 1:11‘ qgwit, !mewl gm'd 4.1gri Del 0.1144N4 laud •

*pal


THE EFFECT ON DOWNTOWN PARKING

Traffic Research Corporation predicted that 55 to 65 percent of the work trips to downtown would use the rapid transit if it was built. Present experience shows that the patronage using a bus transit system is more like 30% to downtown and declining. For the North-West, South-West and North-East lines the patronage predicted for employees is between 23,570 and 27,900 by 1980. Without a rapid transit system it would require 23,400 parking stalls as predicted in the downtown plan. This estimate could well be low since it assumed a 35% mode split. Without rapid transit a 30% mode split (percentage using transit) would be an achievement. With a rapid transit system the needed number of stalls would be reduced by 5,500 employee stalls and 1,800 shopping and other visitor stalls. Parking Spaces required in Central Area* WITHOUT WITH RAPID TRANSIT RAPID TRANSIT Employee Shoppers, etc.

14,500 8,900

9,000 7,100

I 16,100 23,400 Total * Does not include coliseum or residential parking. A reduction of 7,300 parking stalls needed downtown means that the following will not be required downtown: 50.5 acres if surface parking is used OR 8 Underground parking structures like the one under the library at a cost of approximately $ 22 million nlus land costs, OR 12 above ground parking structures like the Bay Parkade at a cost of approximately $ 11 million plus land costs. It should also be realized that in recent reports it was recommended that $ 15 million worth of parking structures be built at the University and $ 7 million worth at the Health Science Complex. The advantage of rapid transit is that the parking can be located where land costs are lower and where less space will be needed due to the passenger drop-off (often called "kiss and ride") at the stations. It should be realized that since not all areas will be served by rapid transit there will still be a need for a considerable amount of additional parking facilities downtown.

lg.


min aosibipa - anowa 661 wrisitar wpm.. siipi Doh! J1 .411U1-01111.1,

in .6 E. mitr I Maw k volsrma mei . :flag 111 MO AP* I ak41 I Id I"

ilg r4,4191111

' Map

CFJP.Pa

21%

IdIV.-11 Otits, pdsmar or.q.L ;01 1, '

• II

kii) ."IP

.14 Nib it Mc OD 41.1 13

AlimP

'I II,

y.1 hid r; PI

Awl 1148PE

Kt 9 I lo Stal I 17 0 1'144' 01 • d 11••.~.1.. I iM i; T i t le I jp.h g,.

' Era ▪

MVP E1' ElIta 11.1 • X 00

Es.

IN 1•41.40

{ I EmtuM013 5.1M 444au

I

111 I I

os iV

mim

ow. ir KW' Jkliei.ILIWAYR

,I

21 r

ANSYSAI.SH .Le

rdI Ilk. kw Liriftiq

1:or obldia • I 1612•1_ilamml, 4 mitim4

gumiktiCO

'km urn B 1.

IEEE MAIN &Mom 40,4 : i.• 'I IA' MA% q I

PRI 4441, 'PAW PII ria 41 5 Ell di I 41til nibera Al II ' VC ;.1. r IJW I rt• •

Mr OD I rile?

.flin

I MI

idgir

I-6- "' 'Vi h I W. dr la La Li I.mil INN MI Lim '

111•6161

•l

II

ma i aitiii.MARIO

I 1 mt 'AO I I 4

it I .111.111],t

06

colciTc ,a6 firrl

, lesia-

r

I

hisamidah

; :11.41

'11 le 14 +4.1 w444I c iimrin•da

limo

1151 40 mks mir 'L 34•11a C IA d

J,

14P-11 Ij

'L idier

!Um weigAitcouk I uuJr tido he lir

wi oil 04 tam ikohor D. ;1.'4 rib'.

de 'Ur 11 . 41 Vim i'EakiNDEIM

ok/k4., Favorllir I I I kite:r&j121 Id' I I 10 INE MAP edifFP dip

id I prombitilip

imirmq two. Wt. AP

Pi Ariel" ggliVerod. 6700 i1Thr '471447ILSP* IRMA 1 .111Pi 211 MA " la Leall IAPI411 i I Ai i IW!N J hir gap 1 aRldItib

Lleiredihni

Lt:

mak ha.

1511 0,I tikm I

! FLU L ". I 91i1 III ill ,111 II41101.4 4.441,1111

. LuVom 111 will 4 •

ptelisN


CHAPTER SIX USEFUL EXAMPLES IN OTHER CITIES

It is only natural to look at the successes and failures of other cities. It would indeed be folly to apply solutions to Edmonton's Transportation that have proven to be out of date in other cities. The examples chosen are of the conventional railway .exception of the Montreal Metro. The Bechtel report type, with reviewed the various types of rapid transit and concluded that the bottom-supported, steel wheel and steel rail, electrically selfpropelled car with two four wheel trucks would be the best type to use in Edmonton. The Montreal Metro uses rubber tired trucks, which is possible in Montreal because the entire system is in subway. As has already been stated a concentrated downtown requires a good rapid public transportation system. Cities that have no concentrated downtown are therefor poor examples, unless decentralization is the objective. The following examples have been chosen. Cleveland and Shaker Heights (a suburb of Cleveland) are an example of post war rapid transit in the U.S.A. Chicago pioneered the multiple use of right-of-way and recently had a demonstration project called the SKOKIE SWIFT. The demonstration project has now been concluded and was to nearly everybody's surprise a success. Toronto is an example of post-war subway construction in Canada. In addition the GO TRANSIT is a project undertaken by the Government of Ontario. This project is an example in Canada of a Provincial Government taking an interest in Public Transportation. Montreal is the second example of rapid transit in Canada. The system was started in the fall of 1966. Another small example is Fort Worth, where a department store found it advantageous to construct its own rapid transit line.

20,


Ewa ma sow wpm imailike law ifi es' MAW ikitEM ur MUM !4*PAWI ri Imam WIPP 11111MMIIEN4 P allideNINCE al ilk ledi 611011 IN. Ode Wie 111921124 tednigl II rill dESI 4111 MIN ENO IiiiPMWIND 901VIi P PM lima wirN 1 I ;i hatig *it ri im•em, pxwortaggii Mal NM ON 10 AT 415 I DAWN id 6219 IOW 14M491. WM /aro.] *all WW1., VII. .naPhiiiii hi dna g . amimi RR Pel 41111 NO 11141211106 PI II'. 6,11 gab EP

MEM WWII WM .1 a IP 57 misa,

11 e PP1115 la I VRA WI 'I'J.#iIMI to MUM!! .rmig &AM =gm

I MIMI deklibila 4 uieitnrgnobtJa I I

miNisming u4

1401PS11041 JAI th Mir

014P1410 rim

t. omen .111 gra

Nal 4ji degpm mi pi I rola Arod wog= PY mi., Pe

obo I

d Ar II -mpg gad 4 31 pi PA

ma Wain nO Liu 1 MA 11.1 . eLlsba Pa Lai rapbroore lop lipireari piRmi wig le. 'Acorn I I 4 F /1141 with aitm eff1101 MIREI II

%kW reim rill01104 011•lacJ coV

Ps all ipatt P

hLig

r 41arabo.• i eh I•1 MIMI

ear* aid ihr itt muipalle

ml EOM

'Writer rii , z iffiJ kilor Fr raw Term 4 1111111 1150 qWh •VI I I 111 1 I till% 11" '..41214

fn. • i gurbmitudi Er' . Nam II PAPAW '

ra

Ii 1 hi I, nail'

1 •i

Riffi I lima ixed h., quail. .1.

3.

I 11 I je l41111Ver H'. lie =hi ipp igENN rffift i1 teed 1 N.117 WM 11 gMIME

a

II

I

• •


CLEVELAND (Ohio)

The Cleveland Transit System operates a rapid transit line using railway right-of-way and the downtown Union Railway Terminal. The Cleveland system provides a number of useful and valuable lessons that show what to avoid and how to adapt to the particular circumstances in a city. The objection to the Cleveland System is that its Easterly leg follows an indirect path to downtown. The second objection is that its downtown terminal is at the edge of the business district about one half mile from its center of town. (It would be equivalent to running rapid transit trains to the CN and CP stations in Edmonton). As a result the Cleveland Transit System has to operate a bus service to distribute its downtown patrons, involving another transfer. Studies have shown that the system could double its patronage if it had a downtown distribution subway. The Cleveland System is building an extension to Hopkins Airport. This four mile extension will probably open in the fall of 1968. The estimated cost of this extension is $ 18 million. Further a study was made recently of building a downtown distributor subway. The 2.6 mile subway was estimated to cost $ 75 million. Subway construction in well established cities become extremely expensive because of the many utilities that have to be relocated. The Cleveland System became possible because it could use rail right-of-way. The valuable assets of the Cleveland System are: 1.The available free parking at its outlying stations. 2.It has many connecting bus routes 3.It has well designed "passenger drop off zones" (kiss-and-ride) at many stations. 4.The Cleveland System has been able to modify its operation according to demand. For example in the off-hours fares are collected on the one-car trains operating almost like a rail-bus: yet in the peak hours 6 to 8 car trains are operated and fares are collected at the stations. 5.the system has shown that it is quite possible to operate express trains in the peak hours over the same tracks as the regular trains. 6.The trains are designed with plenty of seats. Their new cars seat 80 passengers.

21,


11610101

II Midi= Mile 0:1 mid did

val afi 64% kmakihedi Mk Agarx imilehmod %imp imaiusiar -a ?WI .coe.[.4 skiVid MIAINER

,pidEht

Mg 140 WI Inge e 44141FMr I=Viakii 111 111:WP 111 41 'WM* ilk op

vi.apr.g.m, wawa MI lky.0 III *Aro* WA Lilim arsave vriiiIA 1 1 Patel tworm. '.11 • u, tit* ORAN N PrEmo:Nikl Id) W I' oda sal ko N. Trhp

AN all

.

MIA 111 %0 Mon 01 IFIEM1111

L.1 I. W. Az ler ree-161.%2 SO RE, OW dilr.r.un2 ri F lea" IN 1.11 imam Z.4 ?, . Doi asu mlitr Ar kern Nilo gin %Ades as kb rbigtro r th gri vc glan 4504 gime ?C r WI I I I AMU= jell W J1ri. MI .1110M111FAE 1giLi EWA: • 1,11 11112111047P rg anionwasi idfr Anil/WY 10 9.1.1 1141 PIP! de, IPA Mai J ticxver iJri tia.inwori Eicaidism •111I. WIN . Arablf : ,000 eg Cedhil• P gal lenbri %).1. El P. 14%1 ir ma9111. , *el • I I. ion. WI diL ' wirlv 1I11Ith ammo MP VI I %vim Pilto Aritio Nkomo kr.. all Da as ai .rfkkooPpil, WM 110 I; Irivar Aru Nee pof PIO," Patill. 10 ore s I.Pr‘Allerrp iv tentio % 010 1116 1,14 Or ?ars 4 -cFLI I Mal 61.:1)1" -411 'J I II arra Lirn, 1,1 SILOL 9%A mimil 051:1"4 Grel !WM Nr•cei ldvet4P /.1. 1E02 ‘.0111., 4,69 Whim pc. e r 101110014 u :ii GO rg NOM 1ik ..P.Iiirdri dig 4.10 PAW diPlb 01: 01•11t s'Ilkl#1101464 x h


The selling points of the Cleveland System are that it provides fast, comfortable, clean, dependable service and it provides a seat. The Cleveland System is quite a contrast with the "people sewers" (as Lewis MUmford described them) found in some of the very large cities in the U.S.A. The daily weekday patronage at the 13 non-downtown stations varies from 500 to 8000, with an average of 2850. At the Union Terminal the average patronage is 23,000 per day. The outlying stations with high patronage figures have large free parking facilities.

CLL'VF1A1D TRANSIT SYSTal

AND CONNECTING

itouies1

SHAKER HEIGIITS LINE

F (,;(1, ?R FOl )17-c‘

AIRPORT- EXTENSION OPEN

FALL 1968

22


-

__ A

"r.-Y! I --

-

Nam' mown

ir,pi air

ipiPal

ima

'

Pp' r Kagg0 !mite El; TEE VOIE: Mae

~MI GEC AD

II

I

! • I lqIN

d i ll /1111 1QQ

l!se vi II' I

IN

ik/ii

Poi uIa

•I

111

dP

II q 5 %di 1111 im111, 4.

• P='

S i

.I II I I I k mi I 1141

\

I I l'1111:32111111

r l r III ImMold 1.4.6. I .i IVI

I

-

PE

_ -

• Irei. ol • a

' ' '


SHAKER HEIGHTS (Ohio).

Shaker Heights is one of the richest suburbs in the United States. The city was originally planned by the Van Swerigens with rapid transit in mind. The line has two branches with its other terminus the Union Terminal in Cleveland. The subdivision design of Shaker Heights is oriented towards its rapid transit stations (see map). The system carries about 10,000 passengers per day in each direction. The system runs 250 trains per day with a peak hour frequency of a train every 3 to 4 minutes. Part of the line is shared with the Cleveland System. The advantages of the system are the parking facilities at many of its stations. On one of its lines (van Aken) the 10 parking lots fill daily to capacity, indicating that more parking space is required. Overall more than 1500 stalls are provided at 12 of the 22 stations. The system has also some disadvantages such as frequent stops (3 per mile) and requiring an operator for each car. The system uses streetcar type of equipment. It is interesting serves an area with a density density of development is not line, provided there is ample

to note that one branch (Shaker Boulevard) of one lot per acre, showing clearly that required at both ends of a rapid transit parking at the stations.

v TEE0311."—.111111

11 111111110i

ii i RC

t‘.

UTB

1HC HAM

V C 4 Ct FERNVW

ABE

if4C MOM' RD SHAKE.R HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUti

A MAR 3 ts Outt• *au

0

iii!IpJ1Jjj1__ HA

DAD

HAGR1N KINSMAN

RD.

SUSS 1(

m 'Has'

SHAKER HEIGHTS l r151.NS I r RAPID ,,,Vk . 0 RA

, ota

mu.ca

RAPID TRASISIT 5LRWL RAPID TatINT $TOP

0

p

57740

MO

i1I 'A

II • 1 ARM

LI,C

/CLAM

FIGURE FIVE

2.3.


add= to ildritammiup.bp2rmin Criii Mk

ip • Isar mi.66•41 "aro r j

Ili Merin Pl. Plow

im

r.

111 'A

Lt I III I'''M I Ai

lido • at

el

1" I ' f tH' P ; 'a ' I I a' I

IIAILIPIMP

111 I k g e/1:11 I

I PPIP

ego o' Y." 34 I I 1•N VcI aid 3'i y isAl I ' g :1 "i•I I I ;di Di . Mb n or NI P. P - i A. ge! . " k Jo Iv AZ i km I .1 .4 " 140. m6 hal . Pi : • prEd '411( Ih is*, " co* 6., ' I I • . VI. I led I IM P pl

11 11 Vs

Mae"

:

I I I I II I

11'M 111 I 'WI Pr ,

illi iii PPP!.

:`• ;le BA I Pi

Ja E

II

'P. 14

111W Ellir: e: ; : .• .

I

Ald 1 ri

.117 I I .": i mi

. A

If'

II dri:

1 1

.

I

1

II ;

' I1

I

I .

r

. ii

I

LIW

. al

F j1

i

I 'Nail 1

Yli' I

• ') pedi.

I I 0141111

le

maPd ' gri" hA

II

Il I 1 • I • a I . II .. I 3 41" t. '"g i I ild . o. lc-.0.1. .11 1 ! 1 ki)111 li 4iff ' .. ,• "M . AI • li v • , 11 i 11 I I 1 11 Yi 1° ;I I I , I I. .1 mr • II 7 .. I 14 II . 1. "4 • II dill r . i :..:16 i 11 1 1 •. 1 p 0.ro 6 I , II I?" . , I ., rl 1 4. •I IA h .I • ' a II A . . , .... I II I UIP e .10•41116mErrip. , ril II . illy . • ..,1 , .. 0 .. E.. ...L.40-......24.irdv..411.11P. • I. 1 .. Iii I pi ., r Drcol, . !•

I

I

I

i

p

i ,1 II

.

I

p

IR

am II I

r 5I

p 1 II

: ur

I iliml lel II: I

I.

ii pa: I 1

i

.11 ,., ,, .,. 0

1 . j Fl i.tiin . dill 9 Au V gre'l I.

i

r • mill P aa 4 I 1 P

mu 1'

i

i 1 i .14

' • ---T . P

11 1

I II

..

T lh I Li N. mata 1 Nal A I .d


CHICAGO - EISENHOWER EXPRESSWAY (Congress Street Expressway)

In the literature the Eisenhower Expressway is mentioned as an example of cooraination, since a rapid transit line operates in the median of the expressway. It is of course true that locating a rapid transit line in the median, means that the cost of right-of-way can be shared. On analysis it is found that this particular rapid transit line replaced another elevated line. Also there are no parking facilities along the line, nor are express trains operated along this line. Furthermore there is duplication in providing transportation facilities with the expressway. The transfer movement bewteen rapid transit and bus transit or cars also interferes with the exit ramps of the expressway. The patronage on this line is about 58,000 with about 5,000 in the peak direction during the peak hour. The high capacity figures often quoted for transit such as 40,000 per hour imp31i crush loads. A seat-for-all policy would mean lower capacities, but a far more attractive system. CHICAGO - SKOKIE SWIFT

The Skokie Swift is a federany assisted mass transportation project that was started in April 1964. The Skokie Swift is a shuttle rapid transit service, feeding into the regular Chicago rapid transit lines at Howard Station. The station spacing is 5 miles, the scheduled speed is 46 mph. Instead of intermediate stations, a park-and-ride lot was built at the outer terminal with an initial capacity of 385 cars. It was later expanded to 555 car capacity. The line has seven level crossings at grade which are protected with automatic crossing gates. The line capacity with these level crossings was found to be a 5 minute service, which is provided in the peak hour (3 car trains .The midday service is a train every 15 minutes. The line carries five times the level thought probable when the line was planned. Considering that the line had been a railroad for forty years and had proved twice to be a failure. The average weekday load is about 8000 riders (after 3 years). The peak hour load is about 1500 riders. One of the conclusions of the demonstration project was that while buses could have moved this load, buses were not able to generate the traffic in the first place!

24.


Add

allEi MEI mil= EH ii E

*WO.

sidiftrC IIPPP1 mill otos es rim IAA g? Imilik4 Plawel Eimig "iliddem 11411.1111 Ne Eils Emaddiedial • .1 .100 rft•If wow !ter vinebk inshotr oisio0

DIN% MINEithh

am hogcL 141.1. 1,1c RINI ..4110019-urvii nk I to 101111110 Eli adie II I I llow.,‘ sir kilt L alfaVr Ain fe mom .. mit?. si4 I'o. Pow eV I 1/4111 I1311 z 1r4 et AR .11 11 01•11 Ihi PIO mtle OM" %11 114il oc.rr •d• uI1.12 • migg F 1 e :71 cIII; WWI %Top om, • •

m

II loom :Vv. g

. '14 3iroF 'PE

'' 1" "11% A Arl 11:MHE

11" 11 t 416 Oil

114 ird

p

u.. I 01

ard0 I " OM I F •1..riavet, 1j. I . gok Okr mos 4' .M.N4 • L . .1 . .1 N: .onci. • op., /. ea po all 11111 • 7,1 •alm". I I 1101 la . arm . deP.1 .PFINITEEP Dainbii Nib inirrei I 1,1 ,'esi 4111.4 pd. mop IIIII I! Ili 41! ic 41 1/411•4(0144..! LI; I 111M11 rerdwail AR 1IE1 IIi ! : la Ail II NOES ar two WOE ..'"elk4 Ern %tows id 41 WI p.1r, Di 11 I dm di ail sir Ili RP. ,4%&,?I 4%. :kiwi !dm fill Mb Vriir Mal 4iski; el I ddily EMI r VOL IC d. !NI MA* hi Mil dm Azad pi.. H.' .111 L; AP% l " Mil Till 1111 him op tip•kis& 1.1] et' :1 e I 1,1411 did mid NMI I DIVA' c

I .1 011 11 N 1,1

I


The Skokie Swift was accompanied by numerous studies. Some of the findings were as follows: - About 20% of Skokie Swift riders switched from the car - About 30% of the riders were new riders that were not made before. - More than 40% of the trips were new to public transit. Further: 23% of the riders walked to the service 30% drove cars to the station and parked - 28% were driven to the station (car pool or drop off passengers) - 17% arrived by bus. 77% of the trips were work trips. - 86% of the trips were from households with one or more cars, - 30% of the trips were from households with two or more cars - The service area of the station is about'2 miles radius, however some riders came by car from 25 miles away. The success of the SKOKIE SWIFT is due to the frequency of service, speed, relatively new equipittent, and the convenience of park-and-ride facilities. Further an effective promotional campaign was carried out, not only was the service provided but the customers knew it was being provided. The line was well able to meet its operating expenses. The objective of the demonstration was "To see if a way can be found to serve fast-growing, medium density communities with rapid transit". On that basis the demonstration was considered a success. The other conclusions that were reached were: 1. The mode of transportation used by urban dwellers presently does not reflect the usuage of a modern integrated system if it existed. 2. Park-and-Ride is essential to success, at Skokie a third of the patrons drove their car and another third were passengers in a car. 3. Station spacing should not be close, so that higher speeds will be possible. The SKOKIE SWIFT may be provide the answer to the usual qustion: "What comes first - a good transit service or the market for it"

25,


Nap El gel MEP mob NO W' SI Phi NI MIMI Milk Mt 11 Pm or *A Fo 1 oPlik I'l

'Po Nab w

AT/odd pr. 711 MEP 'lb PIMP Obi og.• ropm .

PM am P MO I ware

imam

I.. jx •

uuIuI0.pd gm .pi •1:1 1111. V am %IV, ,r;c 4:: (1110 JAIN VA

L.Lg c 1 111,As e

11— 11 I:1°6 'PI iIII ell •:Pi bidr "'t T, .plexca Eli a. , Ir. EN 91 I pd .!,11,141 ç, .11 aWu Er

OBEIMIEE

11110 .111. 41P11":1PI

&MI"

morl 11-1%114 ' 5 jrt el II; %V INF 9111111.1 I ?FA' Nor v114.

I.

Olialkirg4

gb

liF re% qtav41.111r1WEI 410 eh% APLIRM kill 1441 54. 1.01,10,1 tire ggpoll

r ef

.8411491 Ma' PIIM' no' PP

I ' rit•s0 .1

OM& 1 1U qvi, stqlk si pdige ci; .1.4r4 114 PIE 111111111" 01"1 Ode 111:111 NH, ,11 011 WWI rhI WI' 111 %WO maw

mar %whirl!.

:4110

REILII'L WE,

Ropige4• Ibimp, .rproid

'1141111 "15' • hOrolink b' cl I ri 'P. ed I

MEIN II 410, mot&• bIt

.1111..lre 'I1.V. 1 0. . I .

tr

ors 11.1 'r ".10

Mr El

Ida io Abw.

1, ; N' ¶ .1ar dint' meow

Iso ii top

9r;' ?Air .1,12.11,i

.11q

' "41111 .1•141 fr.kgagoo '216 f, 1 r I ea

L • Orpr rolot

iF II


TORONTO - CITY

Toronto has both freeways and subways. The spacing of freeways in the East-West direction is approximately 6 miles apart between the Gardiner Expresssway at the Lake Front and the famous Highway 401 (now called the "Macdonald-Cartier Freeway"). The latter freeway is now being reconstructed and the number of lanes is being increased front 4 to 12. The 401 was originally intended as a by-pass, but the freeway is now being surrounded by development and is an urban freeway. If the spacing in Toronto is compared with Edmonton and the Gardiner Expressway with McKinnon Ravine-River Road Freeway then the next East-West Freeway in Edmonton would be at 147 Avenue. Originally another East-,West freeway was proposed at approximately Bloor Street; however this freeway is not being proceeded with. In fact now that a subway has been built along Bloor Street, the land costs would make a freeway financially impossible. The Toronto Transit CoMAisSion(TTC) built the YOnge Street Subway from the surpluses earned during World War II. Further extensions however are being financed fLom general taxation. The present policy in Toronto is to spend dollar for dollar. FOIL evety dot-edit oent on spent on tapid tAanzit. The Toronto subway has 4teewayz a *Leak about three stations per mile (Cleveland one per mile), and there are practically no parking facilities adjacent to the stations. The subway is mainly fed by other surface transit routes and by walkers. Toronto has designed its stations so that bus or streetcar passengers can transfer to the subway without passing through any turnstiles, this is the so called "body-transfer". This method greatly simplifies policing, 'checking and administration costs. The Toronto subway is particularly famous for the land use it has attracted. There are many apartment and office buildings close to its stations. The subway system has also had a healthy influence on downtown Toronto. The construction costs in Toronto are high, namely about $ 16 million per mile (exclusive of equipment). These high costs are due to the fact that the lines are subways, that many existing utility lines have to be relocated and that the system has a frequent station spacing. (The subways replaced existing streetcar lines).


rake INERma

lYkU4Iot foam* h PI WO* aps

aPa 741111 %Am fib I Li d NNW/MP I id IN daieffird , aid 1M II pteo ro Ad 111114 #411111 1110141111M1 J140 mrigett ANNladic WI 41/2 1 ' 1.1 WW1 re PA :4 NI mir nenV- • INI 4.* 1.1111 r 4 1 A WPM HI ..05 *PI I IPZ RPM rea em Add= Pogo I negi !or I," Otirettiv Damil interai... I kil lID •4:41 I Wile. MN • Ew. *Ai EPIA .14 I:LI Yrin iii 1.0 115•11a 11 I. Ir rqh ' 'mA2t 1111R5 I . .114414 UM II UM elz .Pwr wslipt Miami or II tomegir:rthE iLiartr. ow 0. erp el go igikdoNI 11 ' e: Loore . I wall' Oil 1:01,21111 4.1 I c_c1541m I'm • '7 ""•11 _._ 11= 7 - 1111 AIM :IS 1114 • '11 NI 0 7 III dial .1 1. I Innim 1114 Uhl 4.4;eue ,ag. ao, ii idicalq MEP I PPI'ii Fah. repo .cq e.Ppim t," . • . 'oh as al •

I .almi•

:P1 . Iii 1:141mmai, • ska ANEW min MAI 114 Ili 1,i OW I Pliol II'

iftgr Vier' dew ri

y masserld

1.' 1 ' El 1.:1 '1' 'ALM= 41111 I III at I 14rii r• ...I I ift.C1.1.1416 IpkainAl Arr •L .1i, • ..11

Jihc 11111 111•1

.

4 I % IVO ti

Al I I'll

el

4 1611 1 I eillgr.9 11

M... 1.1•

.11.1 iliac

ilb

1 "g' t MHO rr .0 PM.e.

r2oir

' AL?,

1.1

41, r )4,. ow lugs,' verAiipi p: . I Rids- p, k 4i..101. and qv WO Man .1 HIP in? • ,s...$1 rm.: 11.1:014 11•111A .1.41% hENPilvig. ..istaso

1


It is useful to make a comparison between the Toronto Subway and the proposed Edmonton Rapid Transit. The North-East line in Edmonton was estimated by Bechtel to cost about $ 20 million including equipment and the downtown portion of the subway as far as 101 Street, or an average of $ 4 million per mile. The reason for the lower estimated cost in Edmonton is the large portion of the line that operates at grade along the CN right-of-way. Of course it is also expected to operate at3„ volumes that are less than Toronto. It could be said that Edmonton can think of rapid transit even though a quarter the size of Toronto when it sarted its subway, because Edmonton still has the opportunity to build a rapid transit line at a quarter of Toronto's costs. In fact the size of City is unimportant because what matters is: 1.The corridor that the Rapid Transit line serves (is it direct, does it have high employment concentrations, does it intercept major roads, do the stations have adequate parking facilities?) 2.Whether the city wants to have a concentrated downtown. The SKOKIE SWIFT had a patronage of about 8000 both ways. The present route 5 on its Eastern portion has a patronage of about 6000 both ways. The North-East line would generate between 7,300 and 8,700 one-way (Traffic Research Corporation - Estimated usage of proposed Edmonton Rapid Transit System, 1963). The present one-way patronage front the North-East area served by transit is between 4,500 and 6,000 (taking low and high counts). The present A.M. peak (up to 9.30 AM) is between 1,800 and 2,300 patrons. The forecasted patronage is for the downtown area and the Government Center only and does not include the additional patronage that can be expected for the University.

27.


MAP k 1044 %PM 4 11 MINN NEM ei minim Vh orimolgrotk PA tom= •ar immt mei ft 'ski ra's, ' /kw j 110 PIN* tido 4. WI. I lIJ igen. I% *I it arh I. ruin Mk WIN" Nib 1.• 1' gird 'WNW•Irina MEE 11lI r IiJJ uii lR OAP " itIV I• ilrel• • Irlat oil JEV 70,M411 1 ETO ' h"" 1. 11.1 %EU . laNla A ! .1 riodui osivw 4..1 I71. ipd gal 1iT pI'r-1144Aiii .? II a Isrililrl'ilit 11% druel 5 . 1 .1 r4141

MAW

II;

u i,

I

I I

0.1 I 1•IIu I OAP 7.4.! . I !. 1/4sti J r . •,r k.ri Ilk MOM ori e .7144.1 LP 0*a P 1.! 11191 i,MEE 1101 BSIgmlft 111 4i • I ims.k 2. 'r ii NO 1114111Ii k.l9ir..Ju c Wei 5111 '1 irr %WE ilk maxi Nam 4 0 i°PPP &Er trictri ill lei wig I 11E4

I

4111E 19

Jan ir.

"

61•1611 I

E. 2=p %gas ' 'P I NPR

•141, • I Mr '04 1 11.1

111110

ill et

cl%

' 4110 111.4111111

IA • PI L.N.131 1110 II I t 14111 ,1" Ad I F • irg r 141I•m r. 1. • I lei ir4 rilifflialdli% lit set IP " h. I ii AP III I WISE


"GO TRANSIT" or GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO TRANSIT

The financing of the Toronto Subways and Frcoways caused the Metro Government to ask for assistance from the Provincial Government of Ontario. The Provincial Government appointed a committee to look into the role that the Provincial Government should play regarding private and public transportation. The Committee made the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study. On May 19th, 1965 a program of Provincially sponsored commuter train operations in the Toronto area was announced by the Provincial Goveinntent. The first of these commuter lines went into operation in May 1967 and goes from Pickering in the East to Hamilton in the West along the Lakeshore. The commuter service is being operated by the C.N. under contract with the Provincial Government. The Province pays a subsidy for the operations of $ 2,000,000 per year and it paid for the equipment and station improvements. The capital cost of 40 coaches, 8 locomotives, 5 self-propelled cars and station improvements was about $ 17 million. Crime Magazine, January 5, 1968). The reasons for this move were: 1. It will cost one third of the interest charges alone on additional freeway lanes to carry the same number of commuters by road. The interest cost in 1965 was taken at 4.8% for a 52 mile freeway which would mean an annual cost of $ 6 million. This calculation takes no account of the annual cost of maintenance, lighting etc. of a 52 mile freeway. 2. It could be put into operation quickly - it took 2 years only. 3. It avoids or at least delays the staggering costs of building more super-highways to handle a lake-shore corridor population surge. Features of the system are: .1. Feeder bus service to the 14 stations 2. Parking at the stations, except for Toronto Union. 3. Light-weight trains with speeds over 60 mph, modern cars with 116 seats. 4. By increasing the size of trains up to 12,000 passengers per hour could be carried. minute service is operated in the peak hours Monday through 5. A twen t y-, Friday, and an hourly service at other hours. 6. The cost of riding was made attractive compared to driving downtown all the way and having to park downtown at a $1 per day.

28


is Akin miliPliserr Kum 4w Iwo r Aim! Ku mpsdaid mod lizamm ohgraim lib RIM JIM I WI iskm pro I 1. r . ,•10 iIi 1411 II' I

iri I I iMai • WI. pci. , I ibbi NOP 'ii ftik.4 1 111 MIP me I 111 '71. 1 I

e OND obati,

I I 1.11 r Fl 5110 pm lig •!"' ,110: 711101 , • .11 r ' . 11131NW I 16i1 I • 11 yl I ' 1! 1 I. !go 1 ia rier EP MP Ii! if Pill IP C 0.1 . I ' el "'IP 1011 hi I% Lizeivei I I .1 I. I 1.• 1.1 ImIn • ,14

MI. I im ir 111 " I eto

iv I

w

0,4

'

Pi

0.4p

' • Er 0. A: 11111 1111 a l istio .1 IN I YI L I id 4 1-1,c P ,• • I 11. 1 .1' I . i14..1 t et I ii Ik+ 10 pimpilir c,0 .1, ; 'r Ili" a :II 16101 •i .111111.° •Veep' FIJI, I 40k 4D'el AWE& ñii,.

I IlEnde

I le, Wit '11115 .14 ,q*.rdPki 11 II wiriv,.44 111 I I. 1•11.... -II.: no.. • eeeli 1• • 1 1 1n11 :' 1;1 0, 15 01111 141 11 I 91 r ufrigsh MEP "Pi" ' I" OW Al 1mg 11 !ID 'ii gI iv I. I NO MON E

1114.1 di.' I lie

!

WI I

NI I •

.1

"0 1 n

.*

r

'.. D I.

14 ' e

lid

rsidenil E.1 rood,. ritillil r ros 1.4 wrikt I. ti

1

a

I% La Mr I Je '111110 JP 11, Wee II ra him 'pike •1, .19 . liIIpI 0 01a ; roa g AIM IMP' . rip 14 I, Id CI mailrlial "ha levon' !qh '1111 ilk .r.

red.

f


FIGURE SIX

At the Union Terminal in Toronto, the GO TRANSIT has easy access to Toronto's Subway system. The results since the start of operations show that GO TRANSIT is fulfilling its expectations. The following daily rider figures tell a story in itself: July 1967 10,365 September October November

13,000 14,000 15,000

The system was designed for 15,000 per day and it was hoped that this figure would be reached by 1969. During a cold snap in December the loads were up to 16,000, but as a result packed conditions occurred in the trains (200 rather than 116 per car). GO TRANSIT has now ordered an additional 14 cars and it is adding another 400 additional parking spaces to the 2000 free spaces originally provided. The decision by the Government of Ontario to start the GO TRANSIT should be an example to other Provincial Governments. It gives full recognition that commuter transportation is a Public Utility and a Public Service. GO TRANSIT again shows the value of good service, new equipment, parking at the outlying stations and a policy of seats for all. The success of the line has meant that additional equipment has had to be ordered and that additional parking has to be provided.

29


•.1. .11 . Rim NH 14. 4.• lip 4 ih II ' `'.. I. c ' LickePS.

. L

g

. 'wird! ...el.

ri I

II I` Eadmi 14h ..

'

the

y II

,11 I .

I

11

g

NW

1 •

iglo I.

Al •

I

IL. •i

our.

lig

' Elm

t

1.'..

j• I R

441.0: *r' ?P

q,.k.

IN

I

I

op gm

I ri

Nam "Rili

"II IC■

mdi

'•I el nilIR II I

gd Poi

dio

j$.1 .II I III ' 1121Vok

I

111.1P.1,

Jig a

. .111

P I e ' I #31P.

'Pr

Mull

PrOra

7 1 11"Pbor rI

II1

111.11111 ggi Iu

• I le

0g

"II

gl •

r' 3

II 1/4

Id r

g•

wg

.

J

I "II

p

h I

gg

g ." "

•'

• ilia . I • L..' ! C d NE lad I a

IiiI.Iii

h

I

Ng me • M •1111

IPIP ml

.1.40.11iiinCi ii °AN' II

l og.3


MONTREAL Montreal started its rapid transit system in October 1966. The METRO as it is called uses rubber tired trains, and can do so since the entire system is in subway. Also it uses a narrower train, so that two trains can fit side by side into one tunnel. The METRO system of three lines was built in a relatively short time. The most noticeable feature of the system is the design of its stations. For each station architects were appointed and a distinctive design was achieved. The METRO has only one line that serves a large parking lot. This parking lot is located on the South side of the St.Lawrence. This parking lot was also very useful during Expo. The other lines rely on patrons walking to the stations or coming by feeder bus. The Montreal Transit Commission has been able to remove many buses from the downtown area of Montreal, which provided considereable traffic relief. It found it necessary however to add bus service in the outlying areas to feed the METRO system. The advantage of buses in outlying areas is that the buses are able to maintain a reasonable speed. The system proved to be highly successful and carried more patrons than predicted. The METRO also played a major part in the transportation to and from Expo during 1967. The only difficulty the system has run into is that the heat generated by the rubber tires is not being dissipated fast enough.As a result extra ventilation equipment will have to be installed in the tunnels. Unfortunately to make the trains bearable, windows had to be removed during the summer months, making the trains noisier inside than was hoped. The rubber tires permit a faster acceleration and also permit grades up to 6%, while a steel wheel system is limited to 3 per cent grades. EXPO During Expo in 1967 a special rapid transit system was operated on the Expo site. The system operated 48 cars (8 trains of 6 cars each). The Expo Express as it was called was a fully automated train. The operator only had to push a green starting button, and from then on the train worked under automatic control. The cost of the system was $ 12.5 million which includes the 48 cars, the signal and communications system, track, switches, yards and maintenance facilities. The line was 3.5 mile long. Expo Express will be sold during 1968 to the highest bidder.

30


dm REM lin Elul ME swift lir whir pilaf gor r ftp El III 1. Eli NEIL

• hi. .11.1.4m pow mii r al Eh, Apr II • e ion

Abdo . • . 1 .1111.12 1E' 14 IP.

to

.

ii

Pe 1 1P I

1

IF' • ,

bmAri 11664p.. ' E. am kirk

1

I I

I :01

' 'I' I ?I

.:*.

1Y

11

1

1 gta

1

.

h1• 11111

I I

01

rim

ri" II NA

e •' is I a111 •111.1 1 1. • '

k im

ZA

Ir:11

1

411-11

. a

1I

1 11 1

11 11

gig si I I 161111

.1/4. I 1 I

;

,a • I

)114

4111

1

41 I 111.

I1 Y

1

op

+1:11

II I

..'

' 11. ' I III.1II T 11. P u.

II

111 II

III

E

RING . ' .2 I 11 . m1 di po •

1.

• d'h

d

Mal

1041111

no kiwi,

die lea.

I. z I. • I" I 1 1.10 .. 111? ish a • I 'No.v" r .10111111=P III 111 1 1 • Aloe , 1 11, h 'u. L' 1 1.

• 111E

' di id

11

1

111

' "' u l III I 11.11 "

I

rim

1

g

Om .1

.1 1

1=1.1111 11 I 41dt 1 10

1

oh

111 Wm 44

P

ria

'

a

bilrilF

0.!

bi ' II

II • I I

Y I rid

I

he I

PP II

[14 ' • • 41 .1 'iL.%

I

I

r

.

' di) .

kr 1 I 1111

k•I

II

"OM I uI.!ir, oF I • Pe PEW 1.1 'lei ANN or

I 1 4

I 1PP

I

11/1.1

Iu

:d 1 ii • 9. .10 . .l PI I Ii• .11.11461. 11111 Mr 1 p1 %EMI


FORT WORTH, Texas

Leonards Department store operates its own subway in Fort Tribrth, Texas. The store used to operate a shuttle bus service between a parking lot and its downtown store, but found this service unsatisfactory. It decided to build its own subway line flow the parking lot to the basement of its store. The objective was to provide a fast, convenient method of transportation to the Downtown shopping area, free of traffic congestion and parking problems. The line is 4000 feet long and serves a 24 acre (5,000 car) free parking lot on the edge of the Central Business District. At the other end is the subway terminal within Leonard's underground shopping center. With 4 stops on the parking lot, passengers can board the rapid transit cars with a minimum of walking distance. The system operates five cars, operated as single units. The trip takes about 3 minutes. The downtown terminal has an exit to the streets by means of stairs, so that passengers can reach the streets also during the hours that the store is closed. The subway operates continually from 7.00 a.m. to 6.30 p.m., except during late shopping nights when it operates until 9.30 p.m.(monday, Friday and Saturday). There is no service on Sundays. The 5 cars can deliver 500 customers to the store and back every 8 minutes. On peak Saturdays as many as 50,000 rode the system in one direction. Since the store opens at 9.00 a.m. the parking lot can be used by commuters as well. Abput 750 commuters use the system prior to 9.00 a.m. The line has been in operation now for four years and the Leonards Department store consider it primarily responsible for the 21% increase in sales since the line opened. The large parking lot provides the C.B.D. of Fort Wbrth. . almost 20 per cent of the total parking spaces

g000

CAR PARKINS L

31


lanai wow isi; gas&I eirmeno • ibiallaw New Rigkiltim

kw 1 MR MIMI MOM IMEM r lit aril III ill I 'r elk! f ji WARE um 06. 1/44 11• 111Eim lo .ErlY 1.1 1. WI 'SIP 0449 igsD I. 1L' blow& ri• =go mg 411111= 1 II% goelimi. • His 1: .1. r g Firp I I • I 161 I IIIII 1 ' Pe IN 1 ill di I I • r 41: • dbid, waft " PIP110 I r' -" ' .'WE.'" Ik 1111i1 I I el 11 .1 .• '0 'VA' ' P IF p. 1 !kr ..•• uI u, , vi 11 E.a.4 s .1 ).1- tIR *Mimi

kihik

Mal l•

Al

Elkild

EN

re, I

II

1 dI0

RI

• • 4

711

g

I p HNC

06 J. g

.• • IVO I" lir

Pit

11

041

I g I I al 1* I

. i•i le 11 4.1 " A. rod '

VW I h. ON 1ii i'mk • •

" 11' " ufri Ar %VA peitalli. Ij ji q1l' •ligrtrahir

wurm ' .I ",1

I

1.2

I

litcyftZ

nil Ort II

I

IIk

r

.1 •

1 i i I I l• 11 • 110 p

116

I deo

414 1.l 'A III el. I lik7 I g g VI Pi U 1 11 I P ' • 1`. I ..I hi vigil" .1.0!: • i i i '19 'I I P

NAN

. "I I 0121111421Pil dgqo 01INPI III I hing .hdiefigi

• mi PIMA •

Imo

!l" melba II

oiewo

.14 .1.01:41.? I 1J

c INIE4 di

1141101a

P

114 liii gelid 111.1 1

I''

1 IN I IAD 1!I P

IlErE' !IMMO AWN rg

111.1101 4 0 MEM

9

noir Ot

II

da

made4 z

n•

id

• I

'

1.1

p. 1. • Ild

I Pi d 17 •

%Ili

a

'I

•111 I

"p

I

; .11'54 r41"

,

La 4

, •

p

c

I, 11:.0

.

:

III

ism&


CHAPTER SEVEN POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES FOR THE E.T.S. 1. DO NOTHING APPROACH

This approach would mean a continuation of reluctantly adding service to outlying areas and trying to provide an overall service as good as possible. The buses would continue to struggle through traffic congestion to downtown requiring an increasing number of buses even to provide the same service (at present 24 buses have to be added in the evening peak hour to compensate for traffic congestion - this at an annual cost of same $ 125,000 per year at todays cost levels). Since there will not be traffic relief downtown for many years - if ever - the vehicle and manpower requirements would increase without a corresponding increase in service. Together with the high cost of labour, the aging bus fleet and traffic congestion it should be expected that the annual deficit would increase. An ever increasing deficit would produce an annual budget crisis. Fare increases will diminish passenger riding, but not in the peak hour which means the peak requirement of buses and men will still be required. 2. CATER TO THE AUTOMOBILE ONLY

Road proposals like M.E.T.S. have little difficulty in gaining popular and official (or semi-official) approval or acceptance. On the other hand, transit plans have not been considered with any thought of implementation. The net result is that road facilities are being built regardless of whether the actual costs agree with the original estimates and knowing that there will be no direct revenue obtained by the city from these road facilities. If the city is determined to plan an automobile system only the net result for transit must be a declining transit system,providing a minimum of service to those who cannot operate a car. Such a minimum service could be made deliberately unattractive by means of high fares, crush loading and no service in unprofitable areas. Denver appears to have adopted this approach. Only in this way can deficits of the transit system be held down. It should be realized of course that an accelerated program of road construction would be necessary, if the role of transit is to be reduced.

2„


Ii

I

zeggagd.pwo I paw Was Maw" %A MOM* WV iVirmii Fli hil NMI IP 41 al Ile Lid IgillbArcil MAW rfla01011 IV blebs% ASIA Ittlq .2.W.Asseal lir MI*J I•loco• rvh...srmih% !!... ri Wahl I rEINEREMO 1. 1111 II= 11E1 *dr J I PI" ;• r mworti Wpm 1111..' ii Adi doilg wia.vopri ria* .14.4 oreLsotio I1 .makt NM& • , I IN." °I /in 11[1. 110 11d. j001 AIM 4111111 WI I WE 11' I'M I h1.1. . I :1E4 $,Alc al Aist .114, soillo !wog"' I r. 2.1., wise 11 iJ Erigbirre IF* ,asszagith ill I I lib d AIN IA A } iii. I IC Id 11 ' AV 'Iti.r1 .41:1111M di rdROuse 111%73, gel 1"1,- • 111141gt I :Mae h i4410k4 1151 *Ave km 3lb hr. I.. I Rev!. L 12 1115.11'w :11011Trir 'JON id' .~17111e Mg Am' egg • ftri 04:1. •I•P•10, 1e. deri rue. ulP6111 Waltrlita .11. as IOW VII MOM 1:11Fist 0411 ,1 1,, •,

.i:c in

if

LIA1 I . 41,1 111

gf

r •.15,7 L

Zwili2A.

PP I 1,1 ITO 11 1111 I? mo9.111!0 1410 11 II* %It ,IPIP kel 4 Pim %maim? icepirdiakimaz..4 %I owl i.rrpk. vinig 614 r I IV PAWL : •II di; dig% ral i rivo -r"ti iI higluph f1.4, /A MIA• rilda" 014 atir 1..1 Egli .11. 4 ' r 1,41*•!. eo, cod triwi adkii lid IIME•N no lArli eh? 0.411.411phi ilmip IM... R. ma •145 PE.1 4...0.z. 10 CrIAMil :au MI T ;104 II 0,1110 Amp 3442•i rov II4E011 P I. .I i I" 41 • l'•D %El ii..' otiaN iis.1 Mrs. wpm Ifflipsh I'LWA 1.1Kuez. oat oil 1.1 0.1 irm 41 re! oriAbbi 'MAIM I° ' ' 1 h 'di atm 11.1 14.1e1 •'IZIP deri riPott AlMi 41 II 2Kai x krti V% 01 A • I Ii.IO le 'ill 11 011.14 /,;:b cello ?A II 'MK ME MI Imam 111


3. A TRANSIT ONLY PLAN

A transit only plan would only develop transit facilities and in this way attempt to force people back to transit. To suggest in the automotive age a transit only plan is not very realistic. Such a plan ignores the fact that a number of people need their car in this age of mobility (for example doctors, salesmen, etc.). There is also the group whose positions entitle them to special parking privileges. Commercial traffic is also on the increase and has to be provided for in a thriving city. Transit is concerned with people only. The road system also caters better to trips around, but not necessarily through the downtown. The commercial or shopping trip usually has many points of call, the car in these cases is often more convenient. Downtown shopping of course should be at least as convenient as the outlying shopping centers which means the available parking should not be cluttered up with all day parkers. Downtown must be competitive if it is to survive. Transit plans have only been successful if transit catered to cars by providing PARK-AND-RIDE service, and even then it only works if the ride from the parking lot by transit is faster than by car. To concentrate all transportation improvements into transit only is therefor not realistic. 4. A PRACTICAL AND BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

A balanced transportation plan would use the best and most economic portions of all the plans the City now has (M.E.T.S., Downtown, Bechtel, General Plan and others) and also reject the very expensive and unattractive proposals. In Chapter Eight such a BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN is outlined in more detail. However the civic service would have to be geared for implementing such a Transportation Plan. With the present lack of coordination between the various departments and the lack of an established policy as regards transportation (as opposed to road and bridge construction), it will be difficult to implement a balanced transportation plan. A reorganisation as outlined under section 5 is therefor recommended. The Engineers Department, which is presently responsible for roads and traffic, does not have to concern itself with revenues, but with its budget allowance. In contrast the Transit System is expected to produce revenue fruit fares to meet most of its costs.

33.


tio swim s Ess RIFKuPld 161 b. AEA Wf PP 1101111 ggp poliddgigi hribMit. gum Ian brim id 131aeo 09 brie Wins' .LP Phi 1, ale Ire Eimer.: ?I. IN VI I IIINE012 I Ch• II id Ma i )r. 41ilemq APIP 1spil 61111 eir %' iv 31 r 1,1 II& 1.1 ,41 116•11 s dotPleise a ' P,orrb i I Dirk. • OPAF.I opmew 44- frA 'hi I IV. IN wive I 11111 )10 3,41111 P-1111 Nej Rap* irj 101 11 I JO Ydna'an el /1 I du • ,rvi pEckl .ignsak Mad MI6 fititr" 101'0 I NM Mr: +1 .adeam Riza vr $1, AA 001 MI Lk eir Or Mil dig 11I. )Tia, 44m."1 ..Piormac rig Min Id I Ma WO 1•411 .rIc J.1,',Akr 47.44 I QM Ligo VAI Fi IVO IT!' Ai' +,1;P1 I Pt too RIA 11 pl 410 1"ri or [Pali thei 1110.7 • P 1511101 I411 Is:1 w" 11 I 4LIMINI ejail r91.:1111 I ' ,di , v. at Ir • gop Ns. rightim or- I 11.1 2.: re pal .434 .4741100 ebr i..114e • r, ikrol AirLri Lc IL I .werni 111rP%101., 1 • I :PI II I We lir Poi 0111.1., RA' tv Mil ilru• o'm• 1•4 N oaginvo :111 I *ft I MI 114% ' 11 .1 I 1 I 1 Mods. remlitgAilen F II" t blitilih141.0 • P I FEn M 91grall I er 51141 • groirid isa " 1111 I4.. ç1a' mlbei I 1 4141 Olt • I mPire I EI ' TM. ELI bi 4 a 'MO )1'.' I I • nre r41 Vigiri I Is tle I 11 PEI N • 1101 Pli • iitevi, 31'440 TriiikrAd. 401 MENEM' ei I ortiggel Ii ' ofir. MI 1E1 dour 61 one NM I miV .q• P. 4nrot JION


Either all transportation services (roads and transit) should be self sustaining, or all incidental revenue should be part of the General Revenue of the City. Expenditures should then be allocated on the basis of need, service to be provided and established priorities. With no revenue hum the road users a balanced transportation system is more difficult. The car driver in the city is getting something for nothing (maintenance of roads, traffic control etc. costs more than $ 3 million per year alone, all this money is obtained from property taxes, or in other words non-car drivers also pay). The operating deficit of the transit system is about 9% of the total operating transportation budget. There is a gross inbalance in the allocation of transportation funds, and no appreciation of the task that each form of transportation has to perform. The Mission of transit

The primary task of transit, under a balanced transportation concept, is to cater to the HOME-TO-WORK movement particularly to areas of concentrated employment. In this way transit will provide relief in the peak hours and reduce the requirements for roads. The road system should supplement the rapid transit system and be developed more extensively in the areas where rapid transit is too costly or not feasible. The secondary task of transit is to provide service to those persons who do not or cannot operate a car. A basic transit service is one that operates to within one-third of a mile of any developed property, and in any case not more than one-half of a mile from such a nroperty. The basic service to consist of half hour service or less between 7 AM and 7 PM daily, except Sundays and Holidays. ( Transportation Committee Report #2, November 21, 1967). 5. TRANSPORTATION ORGANISATION

The City is in need of a TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. This department would be responsible for Transportation Planning (roads and transit), Transportation design (roads and transit), traffic and transit operations, transit equipment and the like. Without this type of a department the city would have to rely on coordinating committees and goodwill between various departments. The following organisation is recommended for such a department:

3t


M*i

Exam& 1e mow

imam hi AM

malia iNip dark ion NM WSW + a Mai die al slim roil wRi .44Eirill's aim ig sigmr agate .141 baggpow Wilma . iheii cais daft pleauls 71 ilatarasigh slidi mon. N. Iwo IJ* .111* 14 111 !mg swats ..' mix Eli. odLTd £ Pl OriF", IckrfO 111 I Mirbill OMNI PIV mit " 01 Le . i=iliPalPi fjir ▪ bloshao,.1.1ll i n, r . .19.4 I xia a AMP r u 1. 4 mh• :g1; 1.° 013110411Mal ! III aekballOMMO IlipLIP.ZULUelb

mop d pd,r,op:Av .1 ,Lik pr

wee •44$L1 41- AU BMA Eli WI %. OVell 14124u,ke Je USE • Al VII lb koiNlistg 40.z pi "telve......wri- PO .1 104 11 1 0 mempiiim r mmay 14,14 . irrfid 11 lig VI . I wa 'I IIIP# Prin MOM Mil I% pqm • I tht, D. N. a 4. Ikatel kr 01 A. 11 g. I I gi vim ate rasa =Si

5Eriel

.1. ;&1,. 1.;

h FI I . .1 Wain* ma am pojimito ,.t.pova I./ I 'dila "V *?J II411 1 01 %du 1,F1 gm] .,444441orm %ma. RI if "PJ 1611 1 f g "111 We. "fb 'A` IPA 11 Mill PH Mal iNkir PP I I' eteglAmp 2111, a t MI do I 14

.11 Mil 40 RA. 1+

P 1.11r.

AI'

t

/11*

• h NJ..

401111 I

:to. Pi.' .174 afiel.,4 S ' g pa!, II. • Ises, Eno Mill 60 11'i- 1111 -11119Ve VI 4:1 `11"PF °112 1.111% P jar. 'sr •ffilp I id vgiJ .4 II( J. APIA r 114. 111Mi 1 411141 1 101 lid g "Ng Mt AA. hI94( id° • ii" ' II MI id =NW 141i .. c-Ari so

Igimp Rai ft PRI I 1 I

• '14 6121 411W416 11

ZIC VOr


TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT - ORGANIZATION CHART

HEAD OF DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC

TRANSIT

PLANNING

DESIGN

ENGINEER

MANAGER

RESEARCH

ENGINEER

TRAFFIC PARKING OPERATION S OPERATIONS

PUBLIC RELATIONS

METERS SIGNS SIGNALS LOTS MABIONGS GARAGES t;7184p a r PRIVATE 4 o ALis

ADVERTISING CHARTERS SIGHTSEE ING SPECIAL SERVICES TRAFFIC AND PPRKI NG INFORM.

AC ZZATS — TRF BY-LAW ROUT IN PERM ITS

TRANSIT OPERATIONS GARAGES SCHEDULING INFORMATION INSPECTION TRAINING SCHOOL SERVICES

EQUI PMENT REPAIR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

DMINIS't RA V.:)1\1_

AYOX:

GEOMETRIC DESIGN SITN PLANS

SECRfc.T A RA ACZOL:NT I NG ' ETC.

PLANNING

KEEP STUDIES UP TO DATE TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT COUNTS AND STu:L.,IF., s ROUT I NG STREET PRIORITY MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS SPECIFICATIONS PERMITS ( FtECO ENDAT (INS) POLI CY RECOMMENDATIONS

THE ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT ( IN ITS ROLE OF PUBLIC WORKS) REMAIN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACT UAL CONSTRUCTION AND

WOULD MAIN -

TENANCE OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.

THE PARKING METER ENFORCEMENT WOULD BE TRANSFERED TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

FIGURE SEVEN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON BY J.J. BAKKER RENG

/68


II.

. tti EN

.r. .

1

. 7: elikleroit litr)1400 140.1011

Mill

1

MI 6 I

mop .

11611 Vall

1 ..... iik .. flia d I : 1 ...•

LI— . .. !

F d

laile

AIM

r 1

I .

111 (

,

i4.1 .

1

p II • i

I glii

m

s IN' in IA . .g •

i

Ihe

I ItY I I MN"

I

I 1 .

6

1 11111

MI

i I

Irwi 1 1 1. 1 ii LI I il i

'II

:11 I

f

l.

II 1. uI

V' 111114: I j I LP I g 6I I

mil s.:11121 FINN WhE • I. r , la I ' I • lizircei I I • I

1111111 IP

mewl' lir; .N. dri Pitit,r. I.

..11.6F44

• • .11

w-abi ... .1 I lea

I IM

I. yid

• P .1111 hia

I

' 41114140

II

I IC 11

• 41119) 114131

.0 1

. I. di I IL

ie.

191.1

rm.'

Ftill1010C

ta

••}I WIMP

i•j s

I' or' NW 01 i%

II

08101111011111

IANY ;IL 11 IPG IN P ' Imo? .

am Doi


CHAPTER EIGHT THE BALANCED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Introduction.

The situation now is that roadway proposals have been approved although the method of financing is not yet known. In principle, the freeways and freeway ring have been approved; without fully considering the financial implications to the city, without determining the effects that these freeways will have on transit and without fully analysing alternative less ambitious schemes. Several secondary proposals of M.E.T.S. have now been completed (grade separations on the Groat Road) or have been started (East and West end bridges with approaches). Detailed design work is about complete on the McKinnon or Jasper Freeway, 105th Street Bridge with approaches, the MacDonald Bridge and the Downtown Freeway Ring. At the same time downtown development continues more rapidly than predicted. Edmonton now is at the point of decision whether to make it possible to have concentrated development downtown or to start a gradual pluyram of decentralisation because of a lack of transportation facilities in its center. The rate of implementation of freeway construction as recommended in the M.E.T.S. report does not seem possible financially or even politically -- while on the other hand the rate of downtown and university development is greater than previously thought possible. The necessarily partial implementation of M.E.T.S. makes it more urgent now to develop a rapid transit line to serve the high density employment areas. THE RECOMMENDED PLAN The Balanced Transportation Plan recommended here is a system of freeways and expressways which forms a supergrid. The freeways (limited access roads with all intersections grade separated) would link the major Provincial Highways with each other and are located close to downtown, while the expressways (limited access roads with some intersections at grade) would cater to the by-pass traffic and the industrial-commercial traffic. The areas of concentrated employment would be served by rapid transit. The rapid transit line would be served by the expressways at the outlying areas and have plenty of parking facilities at the outlying stations.


Wiliam NO. pip mpb dna ?ix %A a I aralipml iiriconar tart Pell OEMii

Iago 9.1P1 Imo ipri6

Plithett416 12111thm 'MI SW raw !pi rowp4 P

tiptLivabis. isaidarritr

.1,64 gi ming amat Emp

r ,111wM Var ail aka PAP r VIAIMMES 'Pm WW1 I 11 IL 7A' 1 CI k Dilikeft" Minn. XIIMITA mr es. rmilmogime 40141 rinhosnedi Non •&44-aliL *nor ibis „ma

" Olge gig tie"

Mr %IFNI m1046E111 ientiq gc4 /moor k P. ?4 1411511416111

6,1 denoo 0601 IMP .0931 dandhoryin aippe

~WC '114 it ter oati E TI rj

likbuerso RA I 'IWO 1fter114. IM t fsi4 Nrilibpg .0001ii,affr roe *AM r kV*. ario

MktrIPMCF5

f

thieri iPie MIME Aram UR'S& lb 4.1J10 kit ill

MO

Igibegt4 IPioNtlimetreir ion ati. Mkut erMelftligeffen ar111.91.1. P I 1'i 'F' lik iihOtivegnmo WA I :

'WE* PRA *an swir m MCI hal Agl itag GM r.1 PI I a 0910 to PLI Too it,,st

1*1 %IN larlft

MOP taeril ' PIM?

I r lila )*4 "

:1 ru 'Fs=

ro r7.0.6 gal B 0-4 1.4 I 14 Pci

bealiftidge UN in mew kw

. i! 1 :34pplor4

IV 'I k J'ivervlais 1011Piqg

1.

f, nrkAtiriaig Lbw 1 1 /404pr. 1, %11 lagrwro p.m I 1•4 WW1 a% Phil 2 1% p oeib wetomil inClui I 4011i Im:€ 15E10 1 r 01 0101 11 11 E 1 401 11 ,011 nit no I "N 2116411k I Pi oti; IP.1.i1 l j!' !Mg .14 MA malapj MAO d ;irbe eindior • r .1/ win. 1;144 *DI* a

e

• II

I /19d 1 10 d

bPthrL I 0:011

moor 1.1

:mar J! FirldiR 14, 10,1 ild•te h 11

feilleme oliP

logivr

" °11111

voiord

ptIF "+ VIM& 1

I


The Roadway Plan

The most expensive parts of the Freeway proposals are the South Freeway, the Downtown ring and the North-East Freeway. Since rapid transit can serve the South-West, North-East and North-West more economically, it is recommended that the South Freeway, part of the Downtown ring and the North-East Freeway not be proceeded with and be eliminated from the General Plan. The Freeways that are maintained in the plan are the Jasper (or McKinnon) Freeway, the Mill Crock Freeway and an extension of the Mill Creek Freeway North to link with Kingsway. A separate study should be made to determine whether the freeway can be located on the East side of the Industrial airport. The Freeways that are eliminated under this plan had as one of its primary functions to cater to by-pass traffic. It is therefor necessary to upgrade other roads to provide this by-pass function, but these roads can be further away from downtown. The road classification of Expressway should be established by the City. An Expressway is a road with limited access like a freeway but which has some intersections at grade and somewhat lower design standards. The roads that should be made into expressways are: 125th Avenue from the East Bridge to 170th Street. 170th Street from 125 Avenue to Ouesnell Bridge Groat Road - St.Albert Trail with an extension South. Capilano Bridge - 75th Street from 125 Avenue to Mill Creek Freeway 45 th Avenue from Mill Creek Freeway to Ouesnell Bridge 98th Avenue from Mill Creek Freeway to City Limits. Together with the Jasper or McKinnon Freeway, the Mill Crock Freeway and a North Freeway a supergrid of high standard roads is formed. The Groat Road already has three intersections gradeseparated. This road can be upgraded to an expressway, although it would be difficult to convert the Groat Road to a freeway. The Groat Road would have to be extended South however to provide the by-pass function. A more detailed location study should be made regarding this extension to the South. It is possible to link the Groat Road with 113th Street and then with 11th Street (Which is the outlying location of the South Freeway), or it could be linked with 122nd Street.

31


aolkodletilnyvinnimeffivi pifiditaka igeolgara q1 *ma alp nocii sa iimiasi shoal 14rm zeihr.bikterk dro le 14 ri

powl R.d.0,1.010 k • wria ral PRIP10§24 AV r. sni'101•ON lir 14 IA Waled l!le MI :4 I' ' 'alibi 114 iii " I'WSW" loll PM NREi '#'r' I Nit 1..e ere.• Y1 led1151% 'Rd WIN k• PlermArem Fi IPS 110.d.d .1ri,at .. -mow; :1; ' ' 11111 mimeo au riti. 08 . h ' (.461 i g or a DI p%1011 Ir ha I Oak NJ'. . 1)6h 'V 1,1 011 01 .P' In lqie mite ifga.i. :rauat..10, .011 ostep: PR. WNW' " PI ' • gm go.. .11 1...1."A 4. t ink I ere' irk, 11 min sablemei swim .1 Dm 1- 111, 4i'.-0 N. 11 ig *.(111111 -slow nallEigAillftl IIIV:11 ,111 witAinilYi I We 100.• 1 i17A sei par I spill Ilk maingdikw , •1. 4. . IL I •k AO kielP. "WPM kg slimourourarn IP I IpPi oz. vi I "i, FW. I uYagthig Pro•gi);. II P . ; P13.011 OEM 11.11111 11111111 ;Iiim 1 wood. mil . 104i. h ?PO i IT .r.1.1.11g 4 .111 44.1.: ..11.041 relett Full II '5 16 fr. PR ! •Lr ei-wpktem dishiga .-14.1.% .11 1. .11-1 11 JO matt1it,..7 Ariar 1E14 b1 II Palatial I I 311 .IFIZA 1 I ll I :101111 % II k 11.• amp% .1' 5. 111 ir' .k2 ;semi il SOW !"en Lrr .d.r ; Dri.st 414 goiviimill &WWI 41 kae I IIIII I 'V 11 eiN nterio t • ,11 g, hilmmely;

4•14f I %I 4.111 • 4a

..• . rt.'. I "II I'' • 'WC° %41 P. 14 RAN W1114 dApairprom ' .r 9E6 P. 14 ?III I.1 %1 I .1 • 11d4 1b 15 1 Mom %we f diok 1. 011%1 • 414 11 IBLO frog gaillerrl 1111" . ,4:40 Lnlier Osari alir Kels1" Pidt, .11.0iAdir FL idra. !pi romielli gi qr. No, tori r i-bi adiN lib, poj-.70 Nditi F? L, I9 . dAO .Az M .1N allowl owl INN

"RI


Alink with 113th Street would have to be coordinated with the design of the rapid transit line on 114th Street. A link with 122 Street would effect many view lots along the River bank. The East end bridge at Capilanc will provide a link from 118th Avenue (East of the Exhibition Grounds) South to 75th Street. This link should be extended North to link UD with the East-West Expressway at 125th Avenue. The downtown ring would in effect be replaced by a larger ring which would include the Groat Road on the Vest and Kingsway on the North. The interim proposal to pair 106 and 107 Avenues as a pair of one-way streets is still valid however. The pairing of 104 and 105 Streets as a pair of one-way streets (extended to Kingsway) should also be carried out. The Rapid Transit Plan

The most expensive rapid transit lines as proposed by Bechtel were the Jasper Place branch, the North branch along 97 Street and the line to the South-East. As it happens these lines also had the lowest patronage predictions. BRANCH PEAK HOUR TOTAL COST* PATRONAGE S.W. N.W. N.E. Jasper P. S.E. Tunnel

5,900 6,900 5,500 4,500 3,600 4,900 17,300

14,113,000 7,727,000 10,810,000 15,148,000 14,625,000 11,030,000 14,110,000

AVERAGE COST per mile $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2.9 2.5 2.4 3.4 4.9 5.5 5.7

million million million million million million million

* As estimated by Bechtel in i963. These estimates are used for comparison only.

The West, North and South-East areas will be served by freeways with this Balanced Transportation Plan. The least expensive lines (SW,NW and NE) are in areas where frccways would be the most expensive to construct,

and yet would serve the areas of greatest

employment density.

36)


=6 thitigra *VA damp .14 &DM Witemir 14:011411rfla lir. TA Imo dm PP PM so NJ. motels gzi kgbui gui 141 iwensig on .1.6 Immo'

ifiet

im.41501

e Mame =Ea Pal

nil orimum pro iirdmoulik• L19 mfg *QC goariv, Mal MIN id "AO hai 4m ostimiebil IhM Lri rioq afik1.44 .140.0 wag/ 019 Edi nit lam isig siGkziu oite 5DIA441 Lake.' halftem woes ogi iiikaare tot iidreined PJ149 lipprig it %alga! RAW Itc• WA Plig MAIM

Ft

Alteert

11101WWIE tr riar EiniVUOL 1 *ti NUM hoop] Nun; i lmatosi rasa 4iiarae 4211W Ustlx#4 die Glkto ?ma We'd illigiFirk Il,raiP-1,41101 .41 Orti tanifthugy IpN6%. I Uhl glp ?Lk 1.1 Air "Ii I4i?i14 irr Itv pomp! Oiri, 00 moribm N.1 4 111. lor i. 100 I I WC: PA rim ...I awl 1:1 1 4111 n0101.13 0 %V of II1 . .1 !Emir kIVI4 ,1110 tea ,•RAdi der .1 Nowgi vi wipe II VA .11111 11.10111Eile0 11 halm 111 :itiLle mug rligrzatiA 4rit • .ftrEos c =MED kiba " PEN lir was Fitz rho szli; vpril i 40 pawl *Pion& Is! Um% N314[110 Neu t 0:11 12117oeibilivii eirRF 1)1 MO nee Juazilmea. ar rtitiariM I IL dalatei 301141/24460


4t.111-4,1rrLs!

-

h

-I •iira •==3_.11(11 '

— 11 *-

Ate on iron,r

.111 11111.1111 111111111 I 1110-L-1-0 101n11111111IN

r

St1

_ Rae1111111r 9

Ail

II ar.:211,

rkiiffr--11111 II 1 11 79: lie el

iIi

wino

' akr,. "1- • .4. !L.?" •

,

••'.8,. ' 211

'

- II 1111

r

.41 , _41 1_. In i1 OR! 111.441I 1 02111..: I III Lt..711 I 1111

:11 II III I 11141 II 11111 Ilr

Efilt

II I

sminirn

11,1 mi11.111

II III

,•••

%AV%

woo

II III

11111r,fiL8\

,

fj

6141 II II I IF IZiT:19711, 1,111rH ill • Ale.: 111 e

.11

I I; 'Id

r lino I

ii

..11

,z1TTariTia-7- i 114111.i 11 1

aJ

11_,4.7L41 /1111

inv.i01130 A II I II 1111111111 11 ',I1i 1 I II I

1111(k -li , 1111111j11 II I y111111111 rio 1111 I11

I ..iuiiiiiiiuiirnii

IL1L' •

Inv '"''ii

II

II •

.

11111 i_Il 1 II 11 1111100w II I IT hini"Il HP I! It._ 0.2J111111101 9111110 I ml ; 1_! ihhl Min i 1 hi 11 I 11 il I I 11 Iii111 04111111 11111

1111 11 III

1

8-.--

.11

nil

u

we ;18

101111IIIIIIII 11.111111aili :11111

Ili il

1) I 7;

0...1114,111

—i

ling 1

ninth tkt

I II 12111

ss--t-, is 11.•

-um

II

0111111i

.• 111 on •_.,. min I

1

.111

MEP Ili= 1- iiinnr-lur Inni ILIf LEIVI -pin' ' • I I 17,t 13 de 0111111rEe• 1111 mil FiskV1111111dIVAG-1 - trp _=.1111 I1— •000 _

••••=11 lik.

0;-911. nil

IFFB1IIIIElt[1I11I! '

,

1.i.. 111.V

won II le t!

Ill

_

z!I "

.0

II ilk 101I1111i1 1111 I IV

II

iquilinisi

1,4 IltP4, 11111111,11N! null!11111

SW

—tt .1: 11 11111112LLI:11614.1:-A-__ aeralZ

!I. 1111111e tgt` :i. 1,1illifilli nF AV -•

t4•1P 411-AtiV*11 1r 0-1,1LfL e••-•,-ettal ' k . :51r 1E-1111 1 41!144'"111r5" i

( 1L111111 II IIIl

497 /11 41111.111Cliti'Y .1.r3 IZI lit Ta li

;r

Lfn-

fil l r

ILLiI'! mr,.!1;

mop

BALANCED RAN SPORTATION PLAN

!!!' .."! Win I frail grii1 kid I a mai

RAPI D TRANSIT LINE FREEWAY EXPRESSWAYS

I ..0..

FIGURE EIGHT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON. JAN. 1968.


*11ALANCED TPANSPOPTATI(N PLAN as described in the Bakker reoort. 'See Chapter Eight and Figure Eight,

ST. FRANC!

CALDER

125 AVENUE

af, \4_

INGSWAY irport)

,04"\/ EXHIBITION •

BORDEN PK ,

111 AVE

CLARKE STADI6M\

107 AVE1

N.`

\.,

/I

\\KitChenil..

1 1

h

\

..r..1

.). ,,

_

..T,' L)

PAR( ALLEN

VI

--

1.

\...

. 1!

v) •

1.

98 AVE___J _____ ,,

..' GOVERNMENT r / -,,, ____I ,..„ ., 1 1 I t. i • ! \ i . NIVEREITY A \-,, NI \.. Hospital --1 Uniersity .. , .

t 1 1 1 \

106 101 98

14 Li., • ....J rx

t4 ir)I ..)

. 1 / /,-

....1 t.....,

C1C..

FREEWAY .- •

iII t-1

,%

-.. MICHENER PARK

SOUTHGATE 45 il.Vi..7E

i

-- — EXPRESSWAY

, t

----- RAPID TRANSIT

i

----

4

--•—•.-. METS rr,EEUA: - -• to be dplavo., -. --,. beyon4 plann 4, ng 'period ie,20 yrs)

A-PR t 4

;'‘14


CALDER ,s-L11NT)00 f

KIMnSWAv EX;-!ikr-71f riN • •

'''RTMCESS

.

, /1•

SUNSET (111 Ave) .

II1

// ;1RDE,"

CO ()NATION

KITCHEMEP 4.--11111

f\LEOMDRA

)JASPER PLACE

106 ST

CLARK,: ,TA17)1(P

'h ST

10,1T

C

-

V

VICTORIA K UNIVERSITY

.

#

UNIVERSITY HnSRIT1

'

--- Subway MILL CREEK • ;V:NNI,77

:a

40 DARK ALLEN

' MEADOWLARK

PARK riECHTEL PON (Schc,Jiati: stch)

RAItTOW V. 4.LENDPUM '

ST.FPANCI5,;--

CALDER

OM ETf 7 uPI 401/ "- '

KIT,SWAY

111 AVFUF

A4V ROPUEN PAPK

CLARK. STADIJ.1 4 CM / -4—

KITCHENER ' Stne Or overPad •

106 ST lak,ST 98 ST

Subway

rs

IrIVEPNME17 CENTP UNIVEDSITY

BAKKER PLAN FOP UNTVEDSITY HOSPITAL PAPK ALLEM

SOUTHc;ATE Pp9K

DAPID TRANSIT (SchemEtic sketch). COMRARISnN BETWEEN BECHTEL 'LAN Ar. "AKKFP "LAM.

L „

,


-

I


The downtown tunnel

One expensive part of the rapid transit proposal is the downtown tunnel. It is essential that the heart of the business district be served. However the elimination of three branches of the original Bechtel Rapid Transit Plan, makes a modification of the tunnel plan possible. With three branches at each end, as originally proposed, a 5 minute frequency would be possible. With modern train control a 14 minute sequence of trains can be attained. With three of the six branches eliminated, the tunnel would not be used to a desireable capacity. Also there is considereable office development at the North end of the Civic Center. It is recommended therefor that a downtown loop be established, requiring a single bore tunnel under 102 Avenue. All trains would use this tunnel from West to East.The East to West movements would then be made along the C.N.R. right-of-way, with a station at the C.N. Tower. A 5 minute frequency on each of the three branches would again allow the maximum possible use of the tunnel (three trains every 5 minutes in the peak hour) but at a lesser construction cost. There are several advantages to this loop design. It lends itself to stage construction so that the possibility of ultimately implementing the Bechtel proposals is not destroyed. Also the grade separated crossings proposed in the Bechtel Plan would, because of the one-way movement, not be necessary. Again it would reduce initial construction costs. There is also a disadvantage which is an increase in travel time fLuuthe North-East to 102 Avenue and flow 102 Avenue to the South-West. (see the Track Layout Plan). With a downtown loop all trains would terminate in the loop and have as their other terminus the outer end of each branch. Other modifications

Several other modifications are recommended. First of all the High Level Bridge operation can be modified so as to use a single track only on the bridge. It may be possible to use the C.P.R. track in the peak hours only. Although that would make operations easier, it is possible to operate a 5 minute service using a single track only on the bridge itself. Such an arrangement would eliminate the need

4O,


goln VIM

hal dim ma mom mil eats 114110

Atessirs Pid 10 'PPP wow* rvolvd, i•1 I 111 1 1;111369 RCIOINg4m1 , ..Lipi 5

LA maim di emu Tftstiola laalvirrArA.

Ai

qr

MOM ligq Rem ICI IV 1...) I '41116 1 onilliblOPI tu ago De. god eV It* qiLortivai kswI0, Prit ..U.:€1 4.1 Din &iv, rd p.m 511 Napo ,R.1 ams Rai !owed vett I•kiimpro wrgue ea mit %tali 11.11c.rr. Mop ri blelini NNW 14. Re Atii !VW latt, • 01 1 TVA L MO' ff Math void r2q go '4' wilrasit• Pelle opt Y.lait4111041 446 ?EU gI rZwelym ,Proglich: dI MA dliersragte milke Dm No. 1- kitauerrhg 4iii kiNg AsiorRol ywams vainutoe 411514 .730, As hi pew noilmihogi w. r. piel-magen,gs ime era Magi %MIL 202 ag krIA war; 1 ç*!' . mi 1 *JAM mg ifticEPRA MN 711 6111~ 1161,m Mani mid ziam dam 1% Igo .nirkrit PO "ma HO ustri to . _1,. _ iltftelegoiri mmtglibOLAN ax.l.ki M MIN 111. MI Will= 44 Meg ling a 1.1ign &Ojai kloP AP KW VW 04 EfiiiiMN Id IDE if: Albs NI lila IWilie aim an inkillrefhP MO Ling 4brieI *WM elm Ream tatefif e Norm mg l. .Piir1.0051 ME Mitiairvidi iiste


CALDER

EXHIBITION 118 AVE

KINGS WAY INDUSTRIAL AIRPORT

Cat

III AVENUE

CLARKE STADIUM

•107 AVE

CN

ITCHENER ALTERNATIVE LOCAa' ION

BORDEN PARK 112 AVE

106 ST 101ST

98 ST

VERNMENT CENTER

UNIVERSITY

SCHEMATIC TRACK PLAN

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

FIGURE NINE

PARK ALLEN

SOUTHGATE LENDRUM

— — — — FUTURE EXTENSIONS MINUTES IN TRAVEL TIME TO AND FROM 101 STREET

16 MICHENER PARK 122 ST/45 AVE

.7‹

CROSSOVER

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN EDMONTON BY J.J.BAKKER , RENG.

4


I i Ibliiii M Ca. EMAIMI=1.


for the grade separated cross-over with the C.P.R. at the south end of the High Level Bridge. It is also recommended that the North-Fast line be terminated at the Exhibition (118th Avenue). The line can be extended later when the 118th Avenue underpass has been built. Further a station should be added at 107 Avenue on the North-West line. There are several bus routes along 107 Avenue that should feed into the rapid transit line. Kitchener Station may not be necessary. In fact a station between the junctions on the west end of the loop would be better. A detailed design of this portion of the line would show whether such a station is feasible. The rapid transit plan as proposed would have level crossings at the following locations: North-West line at 125 Avenue, Kingsway, 111 Avenue, 107 Avenue and 116 Street North-East line at 95 Street, 112 Avenue, 82 Street and 115 Avenue. It would of course be preferable to have grade separations at these locations, however the SKOKIE SWIFT line has shown that a 5 minute frequency with relatively short trains is possible and still have level crossings protected by automatic gates. The roads already have traffic interruptions at signalized intersections near to these level crossings. Nevertheless it should remain the aim to have these level crossings eliminated at a later stage. Equipment

With some modification the equipment used by the FXPOEXPRESS is suitable. The modifications necessary would be the installation of overhead collection equipment, since overhead electric nick-up would be necessary with level crossings on the line. Electric nick-up would be by means of third rail in the tunnels. The SKOKIE SWIFT uses both overhead and third rail electric pick-up. The Expo Express trains would also have to be split into two-rar units, which means installing additional driver cabs. Detailed technical study of other modifications should however be made before a bid is made.

42-


nob 111111 06 WOOF 410 di dill 41,1 Inn as mird gam MAR Adit mem ifitz irawing azi cr Nawk muse BEN opili *law Pavii Lue0 pith wirignm q 1•4111114 1!WU pketillio 61M 1. iwd 14qIiir ui 1111 1[111F WWI rig Pig Iwo WIPIR1tt4 ii1;10.510.1. 'Ii he? tila AMAI1ovEltio.a eiale e 17 6 A L 9pip sole ted boomote 1.1! i tEmeci CO rim rm.: Allpi itelot rokogroOm di I. on. Tit Ittob aigianik MEND Ad aid lama Aural workileJi naddr igra44Mar dabs kigimmom* slag MINAPANIE filad PePP 4usi Atedo AA:Igoe* 141 ADO MegirlafriAl hthakilisMil b. 9.1k1114:mbreked 27160411 niegarkswild inabasno eV wool Alice ro aIt kielmeigin "Ow. Awl anal

Mr PIS 111111gARALmord gri rriMmi0Jkla. min) .1:10 90 40111iwilodgmzw NIV'pnigittreP VC .114.'114 II MOAN oligh BMA Piki hal 111142A 6.141441111! 101011ffir 410 sais El g Mho 410 Mira& efice 'wawa qg Naado elm WV MR 'ANN' YIP Flic vlbzghgazy .1. +shim Ulm ziorkin idg bawd mikirl !MAP tido OA gem Wort JJrirs &tie? image,' ui 1 Air tcki ii

II


Stage Construction

The implementation of the rapid transit plan can be done in three stages: 1. North-East - CN Tower - North-West 2. Construction of tunnel and implementing the downtown loop. 3. South-West branch via the University. Costs

It is outside the scope of this report to put cost figures on this Balanced Transportation Plan. The cost of freeways seem to have increaded since the original M.E.T.S. estimates were published in 1963. The rapid transit costs should however be considereable lower with the modifications proposed. The City Engineer's Department has however the experience in tunnelling to be able to provide revised cost estimates. If the City is successful in obtaining the Expo-Express Equipment, then further savings would be made. Implications of a Balanced Transportation Plan.

If the Balanced Transportation Plan with its rapid transit lines is approved, there are several implications that should be recognised. First of all rapid transit has a very definite effect on land use. The construction of apartments near stations should be encouraged. Modifications to the General Plan may therefor be necessary. Also if a Convention Center, Doomed Stadium or similar facility is going to be built, it should be located next to a rapid transit station. The rapid transit lines would also require a complete reorganisation of the bus line system. The results would be that the bus movements across the High Level and 105 Street Bridges would be greatly reduced or possibly even be eliminated (48 two-way bus movements per peak hour). Similar changes would have to be made in the North-East and North-West parts of the City.

03.


I ii

11

I

IN 4111 IN now

11

qi Akin wi mg NM4JI1 ortiktftitiVe ittigfral Imam Mint IN, MENIN bbralo EMI NIMII° Pk AIN ME :1110M hiPPION 1 tflpveal VIM Nal Sim Wm! or Wm MI GO MAN* igitimprarm gat • Idea ai Mita 44F6112ft lIIlimg& LoWadarga......."Ikapte. alarming' WW1 EL h iffliOdi Lb*, iwgr elismistr OW le eat Menai lo meg ENIIMP IMPEEldsb -diobtranma irso NO Oa" I optima% HE I. ei utarigtoin bils19 31741A .11:411000316 6 2i MI gffis Masi Glom ct AM% at oungsci IlWitado iSs Moo mon 4p 1 4 bliPp1 /12 MOO 14141P gfili 44111 I 1 etir Ifflig% 42111. LIAft Oen led Gina ILli gibagiimiliis mme, ilipaipa gm teaks Alloy MI a man Um& folikarai poi 1110 Ir 'Mar 31111•19101

a


CHPPTEP NINE PECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Balanced Transportation Plan outlined in Chapter Eight be approved in principle. 2. That detailed design be started on the rapid transit proposals, namely the North-East, North-West, Downtown loop and South-West lines. 3. That TOP LEVEL MANAGEMENT negotiations be started with the head offices of the two railway companies about the use of their right-of-ways for rapid transit. 4. That the City takes the necessary stens to bid on the Expo Express equipment; and use this equipment to implement the first stage of a rapid transit line. 5. That TOP LEVEL negotiations be started with the Provincial Government regarding the capital financing of TPANSPOPTATION facilities. These negotiations should include: a. an agreed set of rules of financing the continuation of Provincial Highways as freeways through the City, and b. the financing of Public Transportation facilities on the same bases as freeways when such a public transportation facility replaces the need for a freeway or serves Provincial institutions such as the Government offices and the University. 6. That the South Freeway and the North-East Freeway not be proceeded with and that these proposals be removed from the General Plan. 7. That the South-East, West and North rapid transit lines not be proceeded with as they are more expensive to build and as they duplicate the proposed freeways in the Mill Creek avine, the Jasper or McKinnon Freeway and the North Freeway. 8. That a study be made of the alignment of the North-West freeway with a view of locating this freeway East of the Industrial Airport, so as to avoid duplication with the North-West rapid transit line and the Groat Poad, 9. That the Downtown Freeway Ping be modified by eliminating the West leg and the North leg. 10. That a Transportation Department be established to coordinate road and transit transportation.

44,


IP 11%1 14 *WI MAW IF 401ald INN* AnisgitaiBIM Mg MEM r *WNW Als WA Pm *Wen* glpiriipo Ma 'AS NI eid raw! cmigivt. ;11 ism mi Az4 ABM I VA 111• hilIM oi km inrr ;11 20:114 iiIr oregl B1411 Pi, II. 1" irl d FIN ni P WWI AliN ing gigli Rea ffif7112mhirit 4VI tinib•ire, ]til•Ng 11 ' ..LA f hroLo ION lei mmHg ! 9 r lb I bn iip. alb • 111 RH • NEI vni plgappro 4 pidEtah sk 'WW 1 11E10 folurevism , 4111 pla !taw Ili hir af-raina pme Er IV& KINgale olp 'Kb I IF Ed [ urrir4 lIDSM 1 "11114 5 mil ins H4ILI APS 41Dri Nil Op ill II 1146 I MM.! ,1 ii ii COO FM FM gIPICA 114 451 1:4101" I I 1110 121~20 MOM $54 POI' ,irm [P. M'm ON? , goo .1 p :04 AiJii i 611 Poi r. ,a Pe& ro Nen mi 4W AL On 1M J1 moi j .1 I wpm" whi !'!"II I 111911 d RIM nail' Om' Ike te !WW1 wi 4 br API *gel I Mt ;Pi: rig qr *I 'b'*'l 1111 °R Aild1410 iiritgi IF" PAW Lrrt 1 k•iv - tgri .'m'.d ni kr .111111 inelIi i it.?E fkgr rad Fe II Igo will winegill MI' MIMI Rill 011.1Pm`91, me Pow AildahriN 1111 gm II I or I ! gail-mem ppirj III

•• p


11. That detailed up-to-date cost estimates be prepared for Council of the proposed rapid transit system and the proposed freeway-expressway system 12. That major facilities such as a colliseum, domed stadium or convention center be located next to a rapid transit line. 13. That a study be made of the type of bus route system that should exist when a rapid transit system is put into operation. 14. That TOP LEVEL negotiations be started with the University to obtain right-of-way for rapid transit through the University area, and for park-and-ride lots and the raPid transit line on the University Farm. 15. That a location study he made of the extension South of the Groat Road to link with either 113th or 122nd Street. H. That adult fares only (or paid for passes) be charged on all regular service buses until 8.30 a.m. and between 4.ao p.m. and 5.30 p.m. londay through Friday (in other words no children's fares or free passes during these hours). These times are related to the highest peaks in ETS travel and this step would reduce the peak vehicle requirements, because it would encourage the staggering of hours by the school boards. 17. That a study be made of changing the "transfer" regulations. Py issuing transfers on a "valid for one hour basis on any route including on the route it was issued" the system would encourage short return trips that can be completed within one hour for a single fare. Although this rule may appear as a fare concession, it would give about the same mileage per fare, and it may also simplify the enforcement of transfer regulations. 18. That the E.T.S. be paid the revenue from Utility profits based on 21/2 per cent rate of return on owner equity on a monthly basis. This revenue should appear in the monthly statements by the E.T.S. This revenue should be to compensate for the stand-by service that the E.T.S. provides. 19. That an operating grant he paid to the E.T.S. to cover the full costs of new routes in new areas for two years or until 80 per cent of the lots are fully developed. 20. That the allowance paid to the E.T.S. for the "free" Old Age Pensioner' passes" be raised to $ 322,400 per year (based on observations of 5,200 rides per day).


II

IA re

II oil

1111111

IF Rid P° Mohl Phin lintommi MI drib win • WIPP= PWIII 41, Eqpt* =I's gqiggplo 2 1: Dor Ibm'Eig misik # 44 cokm ifEir " Pere homed in Mit, hadilailm 91 e • /PIP GI .imeRrtg IK P. I do 0111 eir• 6.1 tl• dew wall thin dig lipal) ft •phroi.. Ix.' i.p Pte4 W. .4.1 in I Nal.. Emi rgt14% 14 0..1%. 04.1. E.9.114 pit.• WIC pi PEN orb NIP° 1111E 46 1,11). id II bog ike onh" I .2 II re* ilVPJAT ilcu'ra I'19 UMW gdai.:14‘41 bd.' Feb Hie!, IPJ war kid Omilis il? lide ii 4140 vorl AIM Nib il lealolP dap rP MAD P VFW"! illrEar 111.1114%7 isdfi slow 1011 tnrii° .00 Rm., ' Joill.rmuND or amp OW kiln OP Ilid 1II I'Rtoupro eel* VA orb •log I Ermillt1 gelt elniq ,R, p gowroi biF 1.11 1. alum ErPo i 01.o. Or' own Pow lumido I' IL 401~. NIP pl **mink iflov$.il 2,4 I •rweil: !IAA wenn bo I urc. wow el lbw II 10 01111+11

'WAD F. wive a ma vws R MP! Er

r RiriNg I1141.4 MI IN Nag 41 I hl Pa WI

I" VIIF

tiii

Om NMI II' 11.1 PP Van,I

WWI 11X

idl iil.

I 114 41 114 PI PO IFF lb

1

ii

mow' PAP ril

11411 04111,


BIBLIOGRAPHY Technical Report for the City of Edmonton Rapid Transit Study by Canadian Bechtel Ltd.

June 1963

Construction Cost Estimate for the City of Edmonton Rapid Transit Study by Canadian Bechtel Ltd. July 1963 Estimate of usuage of the proposed Edmonton Rapid Transit System by Traffic Research Corporation January 1963 General Plan of the City of Edmonton Part IV Chapter II Special Planning Studies City Planning Dept. July 1963 Chapter X Downtown Edmonton City Planning Dept. July 1963 General Plan, City of Edmonton, Alberta

August 1967

Metropolitan Edmonton Transportation Study Volume I Requirements June 1963 Volume 2 Plan and Program December 1963 Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study Prospectus October 1963 Skokie Swift Progress Reports

May 1964 to May 1965

"Role of Mass Transit in Community Development" by D.0 Hyde, General Manager Cleveland Transit System - June 1961 "Design and operation of parking and bus transfer facilities along rail and transit line" by R.L.Wood, Chief Engineer, Cleveland Transit System E.T.S. - Immediate past, present, future

by J.J.Bakker P.Eng. March 1965

Marketing Urban Mass Transit by L.H.Schneider - Harvard University 1965 Design and Construction of Mass Transit System for Canadian Corporation for the 1967 World Exhibition - by Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd. Report on the present operations of the E.T.S. with a view to determining a policy for the future operation of the system - August 1961 by D.L. MacDonald, Superintendent of the E.T.S. Transportation Peport No.2 - November 21,1967 by Ald. P. C. Easton, Chairman. "Todays need for balanced urban transit systems" by E.L.Michaels, IEEE Spectrum, December 1967

z4,


Ed 'NEVI EFEN41 rrmid jogri witAimpumk* pi =pm; Emi mi toi *ft pPosT *If , 4 I IPbaNd MIL kr' krill I, Timm fa v11140610 aP 11= Ohl IS e IPP II Plui tiO% I Mk' )1 Ppm ego Pi. 'id P' 'Vim E 'Main 14 ,r, 11611. 0, ' 'PI 0014 1411 114100111111 rql 'MOM illosP: d ig'? NM 90.1piplia Illicroo be h lhandilkir 2111 airt117.1 shims; .1 111 •! I III WWI ebi;.. :.1.1 lidik 4 I IP 6 4 110 41E 111 VII AP I ilb1P t 411 Irti•rp. Fie NEVI NO F riol gem: 04 onvim '*110,4 mph. Opmeri iii 1.1 111 141,2101 y

ll


APPENDIX ONE

1963. Traffic Research Cbiporation made a prediction of the worktriPs to downtown that would use the pronosed rapid transit system. BRANCH WORETRIPS (one-way) PATRONAGE PPEDICTIONS for 1980 by Traffic Research Corporation January

NW SW NE

10,570 - 12,300 5,700 - 6,950 7,300 - 8,710 7,310 - 8,440 5,020 - 5,930 5,850 - 6,960 SE These volumes are the work trips for the central areas only and do not include social and commercial trips, or work trips that are not oriented to the central area (Packing Plants, University etc.) or the student trips to the University. The above figures cannot be used to predict revenue, for that purpose a total daily patronage prediction has to be made. The work trip prediction was made to determine the peak hour seating capacity required which is needed to design the system. APPENDIX TY() Cost estimates for rapid transit (Canadian Bechtel Ltd. July 1963) BRANCH

Estimated costs (1963 prices)

=Subway NW NE SW Subtotal SE

$ 14,110,000 (two tracks in subway) $ 7,727,000 $ 10,810,000 $ 14,113,000 $ 46,760,000 (excludes eguipment,engincering etc) $ 11,030,000 $ 15,148,000 $ 14,625,000 Total $ 87,563,000 $ 21,446,000 Eguinment Contingengies $ 8,756,000 Engineering $ 8,450,000 TOTAL $ 126,215,000 Note: The elimination of branches and a subway with only one track would reduce the above estimates. Bechtel Corporation determined the largest total figure that such a Project would cost. (1963 prices). APPENDIX THREE FARE HISTORY since 1933 ADULTS cash

Starting date December 1933 September 1947 September 1949 October 1951 February 1953 April 1958 April 1962 November 1967

Tickets

10 cents 5 10 cents 4 17 10 cents 3 14 10 cents 12 10 cents 11 15 cents 8 20 cents 7 25 cents 5

CHILDREN cash Tickets IONTHLY

for 25c 5 cents for 25c 5 cents for $1 for 25c 5 cents for $1 5 cents for $1 for $1 5 cents for $1 10 cents for $1 10 cents for $1 15 cents

PASS 10 for 25cADULTS 10 for 25cADULTS 10 for 25c 8 for 25c 8 for 25c 6 for 25c 4 for 25c $10 2 for 25c $10

47.


iiir.711r7 0: PI I OW I •5114421

OBI• NUR WWI* .11 Li& MU El ifatto I lab figt 4444 sulk, • III1 Kniji Il l 2%1 .1 A oi l %IP otio

gikti

d...imple P I ig • i. 1:11.11

1-1. it '61 ,1 m. ' .L

UMW L ' Jr.li'041 " k • 'red I 3% rioNu

AVM,

lu

'III • I

ON*

11001 • pla ki' AKIN to I tar

TIM! k aigi 11 011-irrr imamI IAmpii VI eidgi km • ei .014 .ri 'mita Iii ujLII eilb If 'VW Er lalf" I OP' WOW arrii MEM kilme 04 IPAISPEIA MIN MENLIPP PAM ' Mar ESN awl& ruph - rim


APPENDIX FOUR Travel time to downtown in minutes BY BUS FROM: BY RAPID TRANSIT from to 9 6 23 EXHIBITION PARK 10 6 3 CLARYT: STADIUM 12 20 10 CALDER 11 13 8 KINGSWAY 10 16 6 UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 14 22 10 SOUTHGATE

YEAR

BY CAR (midday traffic) 13 8 14 10 9 12

APPENDIX FIVE E.T.S. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 1940 - 1967 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE * EXPENDITURE* 801,918 596,539 782,113 864,643 603,854 841,880 1,009,814 1,044,474 682,155 1,423,257 884,734 1,529,639 1,447,306 1,034,596 1,574,197 1,574,040 1,080,455 1,664,138 1,710,116 1,240,004 1,794,178 1,973,503 1,648,523 1,915,533 2,311,177 1,882,201 2,230,997 2,423,959 1,915,922 2,545,407 2,543,820 1,996,315 2,653,794 2,804,753 2,157,166 2,691,677 2,921,021 2,203,994 2,922,037 2,893,387 2,218,024 3,193,466 2,958,326 2,287,872 3,276,815 3,071,258 2,394,271 3,188,859 3,205,551 2,510,458 3,185,756 3,321,517 2,651,448 3,254,977 3,513,192 2,846,005 3,657,077 3,616,562 2,967,817 3,700,941 3,546,355 2,953,070 3,486,969 3,905,395 3,397,038 3,396,370 4,146,348 3,714,307 3,825,661 4,377,538 3,841,620 3,841,089 4,773,495 4,086,739 3,984,965 5,378,097 4,532,553 4,421,907 5,870,859 4,951,867 4,777,931 6,600,000 5,500,000 5,100,000 (est.)

1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 t 1948 1949 t 1950 1951 t 1952 1953 t 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 t 1959 1960 1961 1962 t 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 t * Excludes revenue tax, which was charged up to 1962. t Year of fate increase


•• WEN il! II

wig 4:1 Nor 1 NNE?' I PP,Ragi riPoul 4.161:$4 &PIP Pru 4

%V

II

lig 1101

.1 ill u 12111

lil

11.1

II


APPENDIX SIX RECOM1ENDATIONS MADE IN DRAFT REPOR2 IN SEPTEmRER 1965 This report is an updated version of a draft that was prepared in September 1965, The recommendations at that time are listed below: 1.That an inmediate start be made with the detailed design of the North-East ranid transit line, with the aim that operation will be possible late in 1969 to the North-East: followed with design and implementation of the South-West line with a target year of 1972. (it is assumed that at least one year of planning and three years of construction will be necessary). 2.That from the the City's TOP LEVEL MANAGEMENT (ie. City Commissioners) negotiations be started with the head offices of the various Railway companies as to the use of their right-of-ways for rapid transit (using as a basis the Bechtel Plan - ie. no interference with railway operations) 3.That TOP LEVEL negotiations be started with Expo officials regarding the transit rolling stock and signalization equipment of which Expo has to dispose when the World Fair is over (This equipment is available therefor in 1968). This equipment satisfies the Bechtel specifications and its purchase after a few months of use would save Edmonton substantial sums of money and also provide it with valuable publicity at the World Fair. 4.That TOP LEVEL negotiations be started with the Provincial Government regarding the capital financing of transportation facilities. These negotiations should include an agreed set of rules of financing the continuation of Provincial Highways as freeways through the city, as well as the financing of alternate transportation facilities that reduce the need for additional freeways or that serve provincial institutions such as the Government Center and the Universities. 5.That the South Freeway and North-East Freeway not be proceeded with as they duplicate the rapid transit facilities. 6.That a study be made of the alignment of the North-West freeway to see whether it can be relocated east of the Industrial Airport, so as to avoid duplication with the North-West Rapid Transit line and the Groat Pd. 7.That the South-East, West and North rapid transit lines not be proceeded with as they are more expensive to build and they also duplicate the proposed freeways in the Mill Creek Ravine, the McKinnon Ravine and a realigned North Freeway as mentioned under 6. These freeways are vital links in the Provincial Highway network. 8.That the downtown -freeway ring be modified by eliminating the West leg (the Groat Road if improved with grade separations at 107 and 111 Avenues can fulfill the intended bypass function for a long time) and the Northleg 9.That a Transportation Department be established to coordinate road and transit transportation 10.That the need for the McKinnon Ravine and Mill Creek Freeways be reaffirmed. Financial recommendations The financial condition of the ETS can be given some reprieve if the following steps are taken: 1.Charge adult fares only Oar paid-for passes) on all regular service buses until 8.30 a.m. and between 4.30 p.m. and 5.30 p.m. Monday through Friday (ie. NO children's fares, high school student tickets or free passes). These times are related to the highest peaks in ETS travel and this step will reduce the peak vehicle requirements. 2.Eliminate fare concessions on regular services to high school students and charge adult fares to this group 3.Raise children's fares from 10 cents cash to 15 cents cash and from 4 tickets for 25 cents to 10 tickets for $ 1.00


dIR IM 111 0'11 • '11.1m11 -- min MP' WIC ilmg• Ida will time m de 1.1A .11

haw Er, awoke] gidti •IN I Mig 1iPmai NSI

tens ow i A. du imisi oho 1.1.i id ram rim ; P=11 '; ;111 l'ia.ke hid RIF $11 • 111111 Pgr ;LOW PiE rummil 119 EiTti rag ASIA; API • lid impim 1 rim. iNg 11% AJnibi di !I AP a 'co, 10. .1 mime anal am e • ei.r.'d ' ,q ' r gem 1 ' ' I 110 II I kredieme alga Ow* POI I • Pr I 14: ifs% a N Iwo Ile r I RiA ilco II I w•di .11 % , a , Mk MI PO We 1,11 I I CI h,g vs. *Rag gni 411 10 OE '' • L•F sg p mos' di mho.' two xp. .1, a w0 pi Iwo I. I! L 'I 1111 'al pi. ale WO Poi I,. 1. 11., , 44 NI•ii .910 Litibroht, NI iMidiodd 11. r• . 1: I Rix I ' • eqviki wtm 61' . 7 .1 la= ;Pod imsizi -• . rgi ' 111 kW CM !Hybl E;INP •

or II .r ,

-ow 1 di* 'RP I ' 11461 41 id 111 IMb "1.1' . P %kW ago n 1 414.mi !NE, a .4 bipiCime *Wei. or Inaigr • wing itike "J 'r ther, • k MAIM ha Mg IqJiIi 11 1111 EA 1:1 4P1111 4IAP 1 klierr Woe PA gm Pi aim di Me ilk II AVMs PI

1II .11

er


4.Raise adult fares from 20 cents cash to 25 cents cash and from 7 tickets for $ 1.00 to 6 tickets for $ 1.00 5.Maintain the monthly pass at $ 10.00 6.Maintain the student pass at $ 20.00 up to Christmas and $ 25.00 for January to end of April, but make the passes invalid on Saturdays (the University went to a 5 day week). 7.Pay an operating grant out of general revenue to cover the full costs of new routes in new areas for two years or until 80% of the lots are fully developed whichever is the longer period. 8.Pay an operating grant out of general revenue to cover the extra costs to maintain uneconomic services that are reported by the ETS to Council at budget time and that Council wishes to maintain. 9.Raise the allowance paid to the ETS for the free Old Age Pensioners passes from $ 75,000 to $260,000 per year (based on observations of 5,200 rides per day). 10.Set up a capital development fund for transit and pay into it an amount equal to one-half the capital outlay on roads (this would establish a one-third, two-thirds relationship of the total transportation capital budget in as much as transit moves more than one third the people in the peak hours) and inthis way finance the capital improvements required for the ETS. Of the above items steps 1,2,3,7,8,9 and 10 are essential and important. The city in the past has done plenty of manipulation similar to steps 4 and 5 to know that these steps provide no solution in itself.

5-c


„Orim

'NM •21111. '` ;

p • a;11.C..

2.1 I..

Red

.

BM

h

• r% ri-Dive:17 -

J "1

.

:6-Tr. .

L. •

I. • •, • -

2.1

11"111111111— 11 1111 ".'ci 441100141111P•

)

' •••

• -Pc m)1,_ 11!, j ' 1111.' -.• . •-• 1 Er* .

_ .1

P -1

L - •

k• 4.,

:.

:1-

!

:.-

. . .1.

.

.

.214`

_rjj

ii. '1

,

-La 1.1..e r0-1

-

. ' 1%1

,

.1

r - • I' 6.. Al

. .I

. -

*IQ °••• •

.

dr' •

r

k.

rte,'

I

.

;!. • •

A •-r • • 1 4.::

-

maul .yvicer • 6. •sr1.1 . sif


Prepared for Edmonton (Alta.) - 1968 - Public transportation in Edmonton (1968-01-10)  

A.K.A. "Bakker Report"

Prepared for Edmonton (Alta.) - 1968 - Public transportation in Edmonton (1968-01-10)  

A.K.A. "Bakker Report"

Advertisement