Table E.1
Country Directors and Managers’ Response to the Quantitative Section of the Questionnaire (cont’d)
1
0
3
88
13
0
Technical quality in lending
8.b
0
3
5
3
0
38
63
Technical quality in AAA Bank’s overall org. effectiveness
8.c 8.d
0 2
6 2
1 3
4 4
0 29
86 29
14 43
Other Effectiveness of matrix system
8.e 9
1
0
0
10
100
0
0
0
2
6
2
1
0
73
9 73 82 36 0 55 55 91
0 2 8 1 0 0 18 1 0 4 6 0 0 9
10
178
% Effective
7
Highly Ineffective
8.a
Ineffective
Responsiveness to country needs
Moderately Ineffective
8.b
Moderately Effective
Technical quality in lending
Effective
% No change
6.c 6.d 7.a 7.b 7.c 8.a
1 9 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Highly Effective
% Worsened
QA of ESW QA of NLTA Dual reporting by staff Budgetary arrangements Other transaction costs Responsiveness to country needs
Slightly or Not at All Don’t Know Not Applicable
5.c 5.d 5.e 5.f 5.g 5.h 6.a 6.b
Very Large Extent Substantial Extent Some Extent
% Improved
85.0 27.3 20.0
Not sure
4 0 6
No significant change
0 3 2
Worsened
% Benefits (Sig or Somewhat) outweigh costs
1 5 2
SDs for lending quality CDs for lending quality TTLs for AAA quality SMs for AAA quality SDs for AAA quality CDs for AAA quality QA for technical quality QA for fiduciary/ safeguards
0 1 4 4 4 5 1 3 0 0 3 3 0 6 5 5
Q. 9 Matrix Effectiveness
Q. 8 Pre- and Post-Matrix
Improved
Don’t know/Not sure
4 3 1
Costs somewhat outweigh benefits
Benefits somewhat outweigh costs
2 0 0
Costs significantly outweigh benefits
Benefits significantly outweigh costs
Q. 7 Benefits-Costs
% Very Large/Substantial
Interviewee/Questions
Q. 1-6
The Matrix System at Work