Gender and Governance in Rural Services

Page 293

Figure 6.A.7 Reason for Interaction with Panchayat Members and Officials 100% 80% 60% 40% 20%

m

G

G

P

G

P

pr e em side nt P b e m em r, m (n = ale be 49 r 0) (n G , fe = P m 57 ex ale -m 2 em (n = ) G P be 13 s G ec r 6) P bi reta (n = ll r 27 co y ) lle (n TP cto = 5 pr r (n 33) es = TP iden 35 t ( 1) m ZP emb n = 40 pr er ) es (n = ZP ide 4 n t ( 7) m e n Ta mb = 13 er lu k of (n = ) fic 3 i Zi lla al (n 6) of = fic ia 12) M l (n LA = 6) (n = 12 4)

0%

Dev´t works/(gvt) schemes Drinking water

Toilet/sant´n Housing

Drainage Road

Source: ISEC-IFPRI Survey 2006. Note: GP = gram panchayat; TP = taluk panchayat; ZP = zilla panchayat; MLA = member of legislative assembly.

Figure 6.A.8 Activities Undertaken under Devolved Schemes, as Reported by Male and Female Gram Panchayat Presidents 120

Percent

100 80 60 40 20

de

ve lo St pm at en uto Sw t g ry ar ra or n nt Sw a J s ar aya oz nt ga hi rY G An oj ram an nu a al m ain an te d na re nc pa e ir Sw Pa ac nch hc a ha So G ot G ra ra an m : ga a Ka lya na Yo jan a

0

Female GP president (n = 29) Male GP president (n = 47)

Source: ISEC-IFPRI Survey 2006. Note: Figures show percentage of presidents who report action in each area.

THE LONG ROUTE OF ACCOUNTABILITY

249


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.