UNDP National Human Development Report. Poland 2012. Local and Regional Development.

Page 14

Summary

Data gathered and analysed at the county level allowed us to prepare an HDI ranking on a regional level. The ranking is shown in the following table: Table 1. Voivodeships ranking according to LHDI value in 2010 and change of voivodeship rank in comparison to 20074 Voivodeship

LHDI ranking

Change of rank in comparison to 2007

LHDI

HI

EI

WI

Mazovian

1

0

60.21

58.18

61.68

60.84

Lesser Poland

2

0

51.93

69.10

57.65

35.15

Pomeranian

3

0

51.14

71.28

47.16

39.79

Greater Poland

4

0

50.22

63.32

50.19

39.86

Silesian

5

0

49.54

48.39

53.92

46.59

Opole

6

0

46.95

59.76

55.94

30.96

Lower Silesian

7

0

46.34

47.61

48.79

42.84

Podlasie

8

1

44.40

66.08

51.60

25.67

Lubusz

9

2

44.36

54.72

47.21

33.79

Podkarpacie

10

0

43.77

72.28

48.15

24.09

West Pomeranian

11

-3

42.89

52.31

42.51

35.48

Warmian-Masurian

12

0

42.33

58.61

41.85

30.93

Kuyavian-Pomeranian

13

0

41.22

49.17

42.31

33.67

Lublin

14

1

39.55

48.61

46.46

27.40

Łódź

15

1

39.28

31.48

52.25

36.85

Świętokrzyskie

16

-2

36.78

45.95

39.18

27.62

Source: Own study.

Legend: LHDI – Local Human Development Index HI – Health Index EI – Education Index WI – Welfare Index

The research has confirmed that Warsaw enjoys the highest level of human development (calculated with the LHDI methodology) in the country. But the ranking of 30 counties with the highest LHDI values prepared in the framework of the analysis was quite surprising. It can be seen in the table below:

4 Indices assume values from 1 to 100.

14


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.