[Proposed] ORDER TO REMAND ARBITRATION AWARD

Page 6

1 2 3 4

There is no proof that the current Vortex PTO [design] as it currently exists will have any market into the future. These failures of proof compel the rejection of Claimant’s demand for future lost royalties. For these reasons, Claim Three is denied” 4

“Respondent’s discharge from their performance is sanctioned as a consequence of the return of the technology. Without the [‘437 patent] technology, Respondents cannot render performance under the APA regardless of commercial impracticability” (Page 12)

5 6 7

_____________________________

8

Honorable Judge George H. Foster

9

Judge Of The Superior Court

10 11

Respectfully submitted on January 18, 2011 by: /s/ Shawn Lorenzo York

12

ORIGINAL has been electronically filed with the clerk of the court

13

COPY of the foregoing electronically delivered this same date to: Honorable Judge George Foster Maricopa County Superior Court

14 15 16 17

COPY of the foregoing mailed this same day to: Philip R. Higdon Michael T. Liburdi PERKINS COIE 2901 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

-6-


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.