A8 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2013 THE TIMES
Opinion
◗ Our view
WHO WE ARE
Hard to find champions W
The Abbotsford/Mission Times is a division of LMP Publication Limited Partnership. We’re published Tuesdays and Thursdays from 30887 Peardonville Rd., Abbotsford, B.C. ◗ PUBLISHER
Nick Bastaja
NBastaja@abbotsfordtimes.com ◗ EDITOR
Darren McDonald
DMcDonald@abbotsfordtimes.com
◗ Advertising Manager Shaulene Burkett ◗ Advertising Karin Swain Colin Lundrigan Nordina Newton ◗ Editorial Jean Konda-Witte Christina Toth Rochelle Baker ◗ Production Marilyn Howard Neil Wilson ◗ Administration Louise Parsons Marilyn Masse ◗ Distribution Marylyn Jacobson Murray Simmons ◗ Contact
us
Switchboard .... 604-854-5244 Classified ......... 604-850-9600 Fax .................. 604-854-5541 Visit our website www.abbotsfordtimes.com E-mail us editorial@abbotsfordtimes.com Letters letters@abbotsfordtimes.com 30887 Peardonville Rd. Abbotsford, B.C. V2T 6K2 letters@abbotsfordtimes.com
SCAN PAGE FOR MORE
◗ Opinion
Good, bad, or ugly King Richard T
he discovery of the remains of King Richard III underneath a parking lot last week, identified thanks to mitochondrial DNA from his Canadian great-great-great-etc. nephew, shows how history can twist and turn a living person. We know a lot more about Richard than we do about almost anyone else from his time. For example, how many skeletons of anonymous ditch diggers from 500 years past are being fought over by Leicester and York? We know where and when Richard was born, where he died and what it was that killed him. (He apparently had way too much iron in his system, mostly in the form of swords that had stabbed him in the face. Henry Tudor didn’t kid around.) But we don’t know too much about his personality. What we have are two constructs between which to choose. First there is the Tudor family propaganda, ably expanded upon by Shakespeare. Richard was a piece of something you find in a field where cows have recently spent time. He murdered his nephews, along with anyone else who got in his way. But even Shakespeare couldn’t resist making Richard great. “And therefore, – since I cannot prove a lover, to entertain these fair well-spoken days, – I am determined to prove a villain, and hate the idle pleasures of these days,” he said. This Richard is the smooth-
MATTHEW CLAXTON
the painful truth talking smart guy who scrambles to the throne despite being “crookbacked” and the youngest of three brothers. The worst of his reputation lies on the disappearance of his nephews, the Princes in the Tower. Since the early part of the century, there’s been a move to create another Richard III, claiming that he certainly didn’t kill two innocent children, his own brother’s children. Let’s see, he locked up the heirs to the throne and had them declared illegitimate, thus making him king. But anyone opposed to him would have good reasons to use the kiddies as figureheads of rebellion. And then in 1483, they vanished. I’m not sure we have to call in Sherlock Holmes for this one. Richard proclaimed his innocence, but couldn’t produce the nephews. If this was a modern day case, we’d have some CSI types scraping every dungeon and keep in the Tower of London for clues, and they’d probably lead right back to Richard. Of course, just because he was
a murderous throne-stealing jackass is no reason to look down on Richard of Gloucester. That’s pretty much par for the course for medieval royalty. In fact, the behaviour of royalty back when they had any power is much closer to the behaviour of modern day gangsters. They kill for power and prestige, and they answer to no law. Compare Richard III to another king of England, similarly named, Richard I, a.k.a Richard Lionheart. He has a magnificent reputation but he’s arguably not much better than Gloucester. For one thing, Richard III seems to have killed less people. Richard the Lionheart fought against his own father, his brother John, and a cousin, and waged wars everywhere from France to Sicily to Cyprus to the Middle East. In fact, he doesn’t seem to have been happy if he wasn’t laying siege to a castle or stabbing someone. Having left an enormous trail of corpses behind him, Richard was finally killed by an arrow fired from a castle in France. Which is appropriate, since he was French. Really, the king who comes in second only to Alfred the Great for “most English” spoke a couple dialects of French, but hardly spent any time in England itself and never learned the language. ■ Visit Matthew Claxton’s blog at tinyurl.com/7mwo2qj.
e’re sorry to see John Doyle, British Columbia’s auditor general jump ship, although you really can’t blame him. First the government ends his term, then the committee in charge of his position debates whether they want to have him for another eight-year term or not. Then they decide to just extend his term for two years. And then Doyle reveals this week that he’s leaving beautiful B.C. for beautiful Australia and taking a position with the country’s state of Victoria. However, in the transparency vein, we are curious about when he made this decision. Was he headhunted during the brouhaha? Was he already looking for another job? Did he just get fed up with politics in B.C.? Of course, this is all, as the AG will no doubt advise us, part of a person’s right to privacy. We only ask because we naively started to believe that Doyle had a personal investment in the whole transparency, accountability thing in B.C. We saw a champion determined to make a lasting change to the way government operates in B.C. Someone who not only “got it” but was willing to butt heads with whoever he had to in order to focus attention on problems. Were we wrong? Well, partially. We forgot that the guy is, after all, just a human being who needs a job and wants to do his job without having to come to the office everyday to face another mindnumbing slog through bureaucracy, and then face self-interested, ambitious politicians more intent on getting re-elected than answering to the citizens of British Columbia. His parting words implied that folks in B.C. just didn’t get why accountability and transparency were important. He’s probably right. Can the government fill John Doyle’s shoes? Hard to say, but it should certainly try, or it will be further proof that our elected officials don’t “get it”.
■ To comment on this editorial, e-mail us at letters@abbotsfordtimes.com.
◗ Your view Last week’s question: What do you think of Brad Paisley being added to next year’s Rockin’ River Music Fest? 44 % a.] Officially takes makes Mission the new Merritt.
6% b.] Was going anyway, now it’s even better.
50% c.] Couldn’t care less for ‘modern’ country music.
This week’s question: Was B.C. Family Day a worthwhile addition? a.] Absolutely, any holiday is a good holiday. b.] Not really worth the hardship to some businesses. c.] Will tell you next year when I’m better prepared.
VOTE NOW: www.abbotsfordtimes.com