Issuu on Google+

Case: 1:11-cv-00861-SAS-SKB Doc #: 61 Filed: 03/22/13 Page: 1 of 24 PAGEID #: 2521 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LEE PARRISH, et al., : : : : : : : : : Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MASON, et al., Defendants. NO: 1:11-CV-00861 OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 32), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (doc. 47), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Defendants’ Reply (doc. 55). Filing (doc. 50), and Also before the Court is Defendants’ Daubert Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Cyril H. Wecht, M.D. (doc. 54), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (doc. 57), and Defendants’ Reply (doc. 58). The Court held a hearing on these matters on February 26, 2013. For the reasons indicated herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ dispositive motion consistent with this Opinion, and DENIES Defendants’ Daubert motion. I. Background The Estate of Douglas Boucher brings this case for wrongful death, violation of civil rights, and infliction of emotional distress against Defendant police officers Sean McCormick (“McCormick”), Dan Fry (“Fry”), and the City of Mason, Ohio, alleging the officers improperly stopped Douglas Boucher

Boucher ruling

Related publications