Issuu on Google+

BOND V. UNITED STATES: CAN THE PRESIDENT INCREASE CONGRESS’S LEGISLATIVE POWER Ι BY ENTERING INTO A TREATY? Nicholas Quinn RosenkranzΙ Ι On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bond v. United States,1 and as we go to press, the case is still pending before the Court. This is a terrific case, first because it has such lurid facts. Mrs. Bond discovered that her husband had impregnated Ι This is an introduction to an amici curiae brief supporting the petitioner in Bond v. United States, filed on behalf of the Cato Institute, Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, and Atlantic Legal Foundation. The brief is reprinted infra at 233. ΙΙ Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center and a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute. 1 See Transcript of Oral Argument at 1, Bond v. United States, No. 12-158 (U.S. argued Nov. 5, 2013). 228

Rosenkranz updated v 3

Related publications