nyujipel_fall_2012

Page 49

2011]

INVENTIONS MADE FOR HIRE

47

Table 5: Work Made For Hire Benefits v. Patent Doctrines

No Negotiation

Shop Rights

Hired-toInvent

Employee Improv.

No Assignment  From Employee

No Court Intervention

Registrability Exclusion and Licensing Use

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Transfer to Others Protection from Future Rights Termination Shield Duration Universal Application

Moreover, as recent cases make clear, companies cannot rely on the patent law doctrines and contracts with their employees to ensure ownership of the rights to their employees’ inventions.163 For example, the Supreme Court recently held 163

See Stanford, 131 S. Ct. at 2192 (2011) (holding that Stanford did not hold the rights to a patent that was allegedly infringed by Roche’s HIV test kits); Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.