204
204. SICILY, Entella. Punic issues. Circa 300-289 BC. AR Tetradrachm (24mm, 17.02 g, 9h). Head of Herakles right, wearing lion skin / Head of horse left; kerykeion to left, palm tree to right, [M]BßJM (Punic MHSBM) below. Jenkins, Punic 362 (O113/R295); SNG Lloyd 1623 var. (same obv. die, no kerykeion). Good VF, lightly toned, die break on reverse. ($2000) Ex Garth R. Drewry Collection (Classical Numismatic Group 67, 22 September 2004), lot 396.
205. SICILY, Entella. Punic issues. Circa 300-289 BC. AR Tetradrachm (23mm, 17.02 g, 7h). Head of Herakles right, wearing lion skin / Head of horse left; palm tree to right, MBßJM (Punic MHSBM) below. Jenkins, Punic 391 (O120/R319); SNG Lloyd 1646. Good VF, flan flaw on cheek, die flaw on eye. ($2000) Ex Alan Harrison Collection (Dix, Noonan, Webb A10, 22 June 2011), lot 1062.
Ex ‘Exceptional Private Collection’
206. SICILY, Gela. Circa 490/85-480/75 BC. AR Didrachm (18mm, 8.69 g, 5h). Nude warrior riding right, preparing to cast javelin held aloft in his right hand / Forepart of man-headed bull right; 1E¬¡s above. Jenkins, Gela, group Ia, 2 var. (O2/R– [unlisted rev. die]); SNG ANS –; SNG Lloyd –; SNG Lockett 762 (same obv. die). EF, toned, edge marks from possible prior mounting. ($7500) Ex ‘Exceptional Private Collection’ (Leu 76, 27 October 1999), lot 26. The earliest coins of Jenkins’ Group I at Gela reflect the experimental nature of an initial coinage series at a Greek mint. Stylistically, the first six obverses feature a youthful nude male riding a horse, brandishing a spear overhead. Gela had been known for its adept cavalry, and this type is likely an allusion to that asset of the polis. It is uncertain why the initial inclination of the engravers was to depict the warrior bare headed, but this was quickly changed by the addition of a helmet beginning with the seventh obverse die. Depicting a nude warrior with helmet was more typical in contemporary artwork, and this revised obverse type became canonical for the remainder of the city’s didrachm issues. Another interesting “experimental” feature of the earliest coins is the presence of some obverses that are slightly concave. Typically, the obverse of ancient coins are flat or slightly convex, while the reverses are either concave or incuse. The reverse die, being on the hammer used to punch the flan, is typically made with either a raised area, producing an incuse, or a convex surface, producing a concave reverse on the coins. These forms would not only allow for better metal flow when the flan was struck, but also allow the die to better absorb the forces of the striking. In contrast, the obverse dies, placed in the anvil, would be either flat or slightly concave in form. Thus, the concave obverses seen on some of the very early issues at Gela reflect the fact that some of the obverse dies are actually convex, which must have constituted some attempt by the mint to experiment with different die forms. The present coin is one that was produced with such a convex obverse die. As one of the earliest coinages struck on Sicily, it is not surprising to find some experimental aspects in its earliest series, and this coin is a wonderful example of an issue combining both experimental features. As such, this coin could be considered a prototype for the large didrachm coinages that followed.
54