96.
Schilinger, supra note 93.
97.
Tilghman, supra note 37, 173.
98.
See Nash, supra note 53; see also Spotts and Marquand, supra note 44.
99.
See Stolberg, supra note 49 (Ian Wilmut warning against prematurely banning all cloning research; from testimony before the Senate hearings on cloning research, March 12, 1997).
100. The law and medicine, The Economist, March 1, 1997, U.S. ed., 59; see also Pizzulli, supra note 44, 484 (citing Briggs and King, Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into eucleated frogs’eggs, Proc Nat Aca Sci, U S A, 38:455, 1952). 101. Pizzulli, supra note 44, 484, 487. 102. Id., 487. 103. P. Recer, Sheep cloner says cloning people would be inhumane, Associated Press, March 12, 1997 (reported testimony of Dr. Ian Wilmut and of Dr. Harold Varmus before the Senate, March 12, 1997, regarding the banning of human cloning research). 104. Id. (comments of Dr. Ian Wilmut, testifying that as of yet he does not know of “any reason why we would want to copy a person. I personally have still not heard of a potential use of this technique to produce a new person that I would find ethical or acceptable.”). 105. Tilghman statement, supra note 37, 146. 106. Id., 147. 107. Recer, supra note 103. 108. Nash, supra note 53. 109. Recer, supra note 103. 110. Id.; see also Nash, supra note 53. 111. See Recer, supra note 103; see also J. Laurence, and M. Hornsby, Warning on human clones, The Times, February 23, 1997; see also, Whatever next?, The Economist, March 1, 1997, 79 (discussing the problems associated of having mitochondria of egg interact with donor cell).
F-64